Ask the Scholar

Page 68 of 159
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 68

OCR

It is particularly interesting that there was not a national turmoil when we consider Oswald's background and associations. Oswald's Background and Associations The official conclusions about Oswald are that he was a loner- an insignificant nobody. Yet it has never been estab- lished that Oswald was insane or psychologically deranged. The question of motive. thus becomes crucial. There are in our society many loners, many estranged men and women, but they do not therefore kill the President. Even if the question of evidence did not establish a conspiracy, one would have to have been most concerned over the question of motive. Why did Oswald do it? If he was so unimportant a person, then' had he done it, one could expect instead of insisting he was framed, he would have proglaimed to the world he himself did rid it of the President of the United States? An immediate problem which arises involves us in the question of why Oswald, a man who renounced his citizenship, defected to the Soviet Union, asserted his intention of giving away radar secrets, and constituted par excellance by all standards of the F.B.I. and Secret Service a subversive, was not under surveillance, contrary to standard procedure, on the day of President Kennedy motorcade through Dallas. A revealing Dallas Police Report, February 17, 1964 informs us that a Mrs. Teofil Meller saw Karl Marx's Capital at Oswald's house. Mr. Meller checked with the F.B.I. and was told Oswald "was all right. How could such a person have been "all right" to the F.B.I.: Must not inaction on the part of. our government in response to "subersive behavior of Oswald only make sense on the assumption -39- 39

Page data

Page
68
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
6976059c44d16af5
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
7564795
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "7564795",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Conspiracy to Kill JFK-- Its Meaning",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "collections": [
        "John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection",
        "Papers of Jim Garrison"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "imageCount": 159,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "7564795",
    "label": "Conspiracy to Kill JFK-- Its Meaning",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "7564795",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Conspiracy to Kill JFK-- Its Meaning",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "collections": [
        "John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection",
        "Papers of Jim Garrison"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0083.jpg",
    "imageCount": 159,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564795",
    "naId": 7564795,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 68,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/95/5647/7564795/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-024/jfk-garrison-024-0119.jpg",
    "mediaId": "6976059c44d16af5",
    "ocrText": "It is particularly interesting that there was not a national\nturmoil when we consider Oswald's background and associations.\nOswald's Background and Associations\nThe official conclusions about Oswald are that he was a\nloner- an insignificant nobody. Yet it has never been estab-\nlished that Oswald was insane or psychologically deranged. The\nquestion of motive. thus becomes crucial. There are in our society\nmany loners, many estranged men and women, but they do not\ntherefore kill the President. Even if the question of evidence\ndid not establish a conspiracy, one would have to have been\nmost concerned over the question of motive. Why did Oswald\ndo it? If he was so unimportant a person, then' had he done\nit, one could expect instead of insisting he was framed, he\nwould have proglaimed to the world he himself did rid it of\nthe President of the United States?\nAn immediate problem which arises involves us in the question\nof why Oswald, a man who renounced his citizenship, defected to\nthe Soviet Union, asserted his intention of giving away radar\nsecrets, and constituted par excellance by all standards of the\nF.B.I. and Secret Service a subversive, was not under surveillance,\ncontrary to standard procedure, on the day of President Kennedy\nmotorcade through Dallas. A revealing Dallas Police Report,\nFebruary 17, 1964 informs us that a Mrs. Teofil Meller saw\nKarl Marx's Capital at Oswald's house. Mr. Meller checked\nwith the F.B.I. and was told Oswald \"was all right. How\ncould such a person have been \"all right\" to the F.B.I.: Must\nnot inaction on the part of. our government in response to\n\"subersive behavior of Oswald only make sense on the assumption\n-39-\n39"
}