Ask the Scholar

Page 10 of 13
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 10

OCR

Morgan, Route 1, Box 275 Yellow Springs, Ohio 45387 Vincent Salandria January 5, 1967 Dear Vince: I have been to track down the reasons for the lifference in reconstruction of the assassination between Josiah Thompson and most of the others working on the case. I thought you could >robably help me with this. Thompson's theory about the "bastard bullet" coming from Orwald's Carcano was an obvious one that first occurred to LLC as it must have to many others. There is a good deal to support it, but there is also much to refute it, and all reference to such other evidence was left out of Lompson's article (I have not seen the book). This to S led to suspicion and confusion which does not help in the clarification of the case. The evidence left out of Thompson's article includes the two or three bullets that missed "the Teague bullet, and the bullet that witnesses testified hit to the left and rear of limousine that [sconfirmed by the FBL finding of a bullet mark that traced to the west window of the Depository Building, the window at which Rowland ta d seen a rifleman with another man) There is also the mark on the west wall of the jail that Penn Jones located that might have been a miss. The one located by the FBI would have corresponded in time with the bullet that hit Connolly, thus maintaining the time coordination of shooting from different locations that would have been necessary to make it appear that the cross fire had and could have come from but one location. Other major evidence against Thompson's reconstruction is that Weisberg has shown that the Willis photo, presumably taken immediately after chefirst shot, corresponds with Zapruder's 202nd frame; and that the autopsy finding as reported by the FBI tells of the angle of entry into Kennedy's back as 45 to 60 degrees, which would correspond with 45 to 30 degrees from the horizontal in shooting. This could not have been met by a shot from the sixth floor of the Depository Building, and could only have been fulfilled from the top of the Records Building. I respect Thompson for his overcoming preconceptions about Oswald being the rifleman and for a good job on the fatal shot evidence. Yet he le ft out the rather important evidence mentioned in the CBS four hour documentary that each jiggle that caused a blur in the Zapruder pictures might be attributed to noise as from a shot. This alone would help in the reconstruction. For the blurrings are reparted to be at frames 90, 95, 203, 227 and what would correspond to the time of the fatal shot, allowing about five frames for the passage of sound and the respanse of the nervous system. This would tend to confirm Glen Bennett's testenomy that he heard a shot before ha saw a bullet hit the President's C

Page data

Page
10
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
eed45d7ec7c4f071
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
7564887
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "7564887",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564887",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Morgan, Griscom",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564887",
    "collections": [
        "John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection",
        "Papers of Jim Garrison"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/5648/7564887/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-114/jfk-garrison-114-0001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/5648/7564887/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-114/jfk-garrison-114-0001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/5648/7564887/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-114/jfk-garrison-114-0001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 13,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "7564887",
    "label": "Morgan, Griscom",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564887"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "7564887",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564887",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Morgan, Griscom",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564887",
    "collections": [
        "John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection",
        "Papers of Jim Garrison"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/5648/7564887/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-114/jfk-garrison-114-0001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/5648/7564887/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-114/jfk-garrison-114-0001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/5648/7564887/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-114/jfk-garrison-114-0001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 13,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7564887",
    "naId": 7564887,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 10,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/5648/7564887/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/jfkco/641323/jfk-garrison-114/jfk-garrison-114-0009.jpg",
    "mediaId": "eed45d7ec7c4f071",
    "ocrText": "Morgan,\nRoute 1, Box 275\nYellow Springs, Ohio 45387\nVincent Salandria\nJanuary 5, 1967\nDear Vince:\nI have been to track down the reasons for the lifference\nin reconstruction of the assassination between Josiah Thompson\nand most of the others working on the case. I thought you\ncould >robably help me with this.\nThompson's theory about the \"bastard bullet\" coming from\nOrwald's Carcano was an obvious one that first occurred to\nLLC\nas it must have to many others. There is a good deal to\nsupport it, but there is also much to refute it, and all\nreference to such other evidence was left out of Lompson's\narticle (I have not seen the book). This to S led to suspicion\nand confusion which does not help in the clarification of the\ncase.\nThe evidence left out of Thompson's article includes the two\nor three bullets that missed \"the Teague bullet, and the\nbullet that witnesses testified hit to the left and rear of\nlimousine that [sconfirmed by the FBL\nfinding of a bullet mark that traced to the west window of\nthe Depository Building, the window at which Rowland ta d\nseen a rifleman with another man) There is also the\nmark on the west wall of the jail that Penn Jones located\nthat might have been a miss. The one located by the FBI\nwould have corresponded in time with the bullet that hit\nConnolly, thus maintaining the time coordination of shooting\nfrom different locations that would have been necessary to\nmake it appear that the cross fire had and could have come\nfrom but one location.\nOther major evidence against Thompson's reconstruction is\nthat Weisberg has shown that the Willis photo, presumably\ntaken immediately after chefirst shot, corresponds with\nZapruder's 202nd frame; and that the autopsy finding as\nreported by the FBI tells of the angle of entry into Kennedy's\nback as 45 to 60 degrees, which would correspond with\n45 to 30 degrees from the horizontal in shooting. This\ncould not have been met by a shot from the sixth floor of\nthe Depository Building, and could only have been fulfilled\nfrom the top of the Records Building.\nI respect Thompson for his overcoming preconceptions about\nOswald being the rifleman and for a good job on the fatal\nshot evidence. Yet he le ft out the rather important evidence\nmentioned in the CBS four hour documentary that each jiggle\nthat caused a blur in the Zapruder pictures might be attributed\nto\nnoise as from a shot. This alone would help in\nthe reconstruction. For the blurrings are reparted to be at\nframes 90, 95, 203, 227 and what would correspond to the time\nof the fatal shot, allowing about five frames for the\npassage of sound and the respanse of the nervous system.\nThis would tend to confirm Glen Bennett's testenomy that\nhe heard a shot before ha saw a bullet hit the President's\nC"
}