Ask the Scholar
Page 84 of 111
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
3
accept the will of my fellow citizens when
ments of the Americans of their time
they have deliberated earnestly and
They vent too far too fast, and our
State has never forgotten that period
Third. The bill repeals a bayonet-
sincerely.
Basic rights were ignored. Punitivo
Progress for Our People
type Reconstruction statute, whose very
OPEN THE CLOSED MINDS
measures were voted. Since that time,
existence inflames passions and makes it
Never before has : b.n baer so
men of their thinking have never again
REMARILS
more difficult to consider these problems
thorounlity in this fine out of
occupied the seats of Senators from
or
dispassionately.
that debate his come something even
Texas.
HON. LYNDON B. JOHNSON
Fourth. The bill insures the authority
more important than legislation.
CIGNITY AND UNITY
of the Federal courts to aid individuals
This has been a debate which has
We do not have to reconstruct Re-
or TEXAS
secking remedial protections for their
opened et sed minds throughout the
construction in order to have a bill. We
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
civil rights.
country. This has been a debate which
do not have to reopen the wounds.
Fifth. The bill
izes the rist of
Wednesday, August 7, 1957
has made peeple everywhere reexamine
Neither do we have to dispense with
the full powers of
-deral courts to
hard and fast positions.
basic rights-such as the jury trial-in
Mr. JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Presi-
secure the nost importent of all rights-
For the first time in my memory, this
order to have effective legislation.
dent, in 10 minutes the Senate will have
the right to vote.
issue has been lifted from the field of
Under this measure, a good judge can
spent a total of 25 days discussing the
Sixth. The bill guarantces to defend-
portisan politics. It has been considered
secure compliance for his orders. And
civil-rights bill. We will have used 121
ants in criminal contempt proceedings
in terms of human beings and the effect
it is compliance-not vengeance-that
hours and 31 minutes.
in Federal courts the basic right of trial
of our laws upon them.
the Senate seeks.
In all the history of the Senate, I doubt
by jury.
And we shail never get rid of a run-
It may be that experience will demon-
whether there has ever been a debate
On this point, let US be absclutels clear,
ning sore in the body politic until we
strate the need for change in this meas-
which has been conducted on a higher
and let the record be clear.
start thinking in those terms.
ure. That is one of the reasons why we
level. Senators have spoken to the
No Federal judge ill be required to
Two months ago, I had grave misgiv-
are voting to create a commission.
point. Senators have debated the issues.
a jury to enfors complinice with
ings about the value of the commission
Dut the possible necessity for change
Senators have stuck to the facts. For
his orders. He cas resort to fines, to
section. It nemed to me that a com-
is no bar to action. The Senate will not
this, all my colleagues are entitled to
impriconment, and to conpensatory
in a heated political
damages to compet to his
do nothing but
disappear after the vote tonight. We
great credit.
shall be present throughout the years to
NATIONAL LEGISLATION
orders.
inflame passions.
come.
The one thing a Vedere1 could
But I believe the Senate has set a tone
There will be some, of course, who will
I shall vote for the bill. It is effec-
not do without a jury is to trass man
within which the commission can be a
tive legislation. It is enforceable leg-
seek to play politics. Eut I hope there
a criminal in the cyes of al' his fellow
useful instrument. It can gather facts
are none such in the Senate. There is
islation. It seeks to advance the rights
citizens.
instead of charges; it can sift cut the
of all Americans. It is national rather
no compelling need for a campaign issue.
Seventh, and finally, the bill secures
truth from the fancies; and it can return
But there is a compelling need for a
than sectional.
without discrimination the right of all
with recommendations which will be of
solution that will enable all American
In the past few days there has been
citizens, of all races, all cclors, and all
assistance to reaconable men.
considerable discussion about the things
people to live in dignity and in unity.
creeds, to serve on Federal juries.
which the bill does not do. The minority
POUTICS es PROGRESS
This bill is the greatest step toward that
leader has just made some reference to
AN ADVANCE
There are, et course, people who are
objective that has ever been made.
Mr. President, I have served in Con-
To
it now would be a trogedy
them. I ain aware of the fact that the
still more d in securing "otes
than in securi right to vote. There
the
11 mant our consciences for
bill does not pretend to solve all the
gress for more than 20 years. A long line
problems of human relations.
of Texas Senators have preceded me,
are, of cours ple who are still nore
yo:
But I cannot follow the logic of those
clear back to 1371, when my State once
interested in the issue than in a solation
A & AND JUST SENATE
who say that because we cannot solve
again received representation in the
h he issue.
I am aware of the implications of my
all the problems, we should not try to
Senate.
Sus T of whatever experi-
vote. It will be treated cynically in
solve any of them. That is a curious
The last reconstruction statute was
ence I case there is no :
some quarters, and it will be misunder-
process of thought, indeed.
passed in 1875. Since that date, this is-
ical capital in tias issue. Nothing last-
stcod in others. No Texas Scnator has
sue has been agitated and has divided
A STRONG BILL
ing, nothing enduring, has ever men
cast a vote to consider a civil-rights bill
our Nation time and time again. Dur-
born from hatred and prejudice-exce
or a vote for a civil-rights bill since 1375.
I prefer, instead, to consider what the
ing the 32 years since reconstruction,
more hatred and more prejudice.
Eut the Senate has dealt fairly and
bill does, and then to make up my mind
practically any one of the points I have
Political ambition which feeds off
justly with this measure. This is legis-
as to its value on that basis. In this con-
enumerated would have been regarded
hatred of the North or hatred of the
lation which I believe will be good for
cluding hour, let us look at what the
as a history-making advance. The Sen-
South is doomed to frustration.
every State of the Union-and so far as
bill does.
ate, without regard to political division,
There have been times when feelings
I am cencerned, Temos has been a part
First. The bill creates a Civil Rights
is going to be in a position to approve
ran high. There was a time when the
of the Union since Appomattox.
Commission with subpena power. This
seven of them, I hope, tonight.
divisions within this country exploded
I could not have voted for the bill
alone would justify terming the bill a
I can understand the disappointment
into bloodshed.
which came to the Senate, and I so told
constructive step, and it is more than
of those who are not receiving all they
believe they should out of this bill. I
When Texas was readmitted into the
the Senate. But the bill now before the
proponents of civil rights asked the ma-
can understand but not sympathize with
Union on March 30, 1870, two Senators
Senate seeks to solve the problems of
jority leader to have passed last year.
took the seats once occupied by Rusk
1957-not to reopen the wounds of 1865.
Second. The bill creates the office of
their position.
and Sam Houston. The judgments of
This is the result of honest and candid
a new Assistant Attorncy General who
Many times in my life, I have failed to
those new Senators were not the judg-
debate in the greatest deliberative body
can bring the full prestige of his office
secure all that I considered proper and
just and due. But I have learned to
435793-63471
into the field of civil rights.
435793-63471
(2)
Document source description
October 1963 memo on blacks appointed to positions in the Ohio state government.
Page data
- Page
- 84
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 1e678d71702d3c1c
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 183523708
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "183523708",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183523708",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Civil Rights – Miscellaneous 1963",
"description": "October 1963 memo on blacks appointed to positions in the Ohio state government.",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183523708",
"collections": [
"Office Files of Lee C. White",
"Civil Rights Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/johnson/lbj-lwhite/40031964/40031964-aides-white-b06-f08-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/johnson/lbj-lwhite/40031964/40031964-aides-white-b06-f08-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/johnson/lbj-lwhite/40031964/40031964-aides-white-b06-f08-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 111,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "183523708",
"label": "Civil Rights – Miscellaneous 1963",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183523708"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "183523708",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183523708",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Civil Rights – Miscellaneous 1963",
"description": "October 1963 memo on blacks appointed to positions in the Ohio state government.",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183523708",
"collections": [
"Office Files of Lee C. White",
"Civil Rights Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/johnson/lbj-lwhite/40031964/40031964-aides-white-b06-f08-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/johnson/lbj-lwhite/40031964/40031964-aides-white-b06-f08-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/johnson/lbj-lwhite/40031964/40031964-aides-white-b06-f08-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 111,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183523708",
"naId": 183523708,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 84,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/johnson/lbj-lwhite/40031964/40031964-aides-white-b06-f09-073.jpg",
"mediaId": "1e678d71702d3c1c",
"ocrText": "3\naccept the will of my fellow citizens when\nments of the Americans of their time\nthey have deliberated earnestly and\nThey vent too far too fast, and our\nState has never forgotten that period\nThird. The bill repeals a bayonet-\nsincerely.\nBasic rights were ignored. Punitivo\nProgress for Our People\ntype Reconstruction statute, whose very\nOPEN THE CLOSED MINDS\nmeasures were voted. Since that time,\nexistence inflames passions and makes it\nNever before has : b.n baer so\nmen of their thinking have never again\nREMARILS\nmore difficult to consider these problems\nthorounlity in this fine out of\noccupied the seats of Senators from\nor\ndispassionately.\nthat debate his come something even\nTexas.\nHON. LYNDON B. JOHNSON\nFourth. The bill insures the authority\nmore important than legislation.\nCIGNITY AND UNITY\nof the Federal courts to aid individuals\nThis has been a debate which has\nWe do not have to reconstruct Re-\nor TEXAS\nsecking remedial protections for their\nopened et sed minds throughout the\nconstruction in order to have a bill. We\nIN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES\ncivil rights.\ncountry. This has been a debate which\ndo not have to reopen the wounds.\nFifth. The bill\nizes the rist of\nWednesday, August 7, 1957\nhas made peeple everywhere reexamine\nNeither do we have to dispense with\nthe full powers of\n-deral courts to\nhard and fast positions.\nbasic rights-such as the jury trial-in\nMr. JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Presi-\nsecure the nost importent of all rights-\nFor the first time in my memory, this\norder to have effective legislation.\ndent, in 10 minutes the Senate will have\nthe right to vote.\nissue has been lifted from the field of\nUnder this measure, a good judge can\nspent a total of 25 days discussing the\nSixth. The bill guarantces to defend-\nportisan politics. It has been considered\nsecure compliance for his orders. And\ncivil-rights bill. We will have used 121\nants in criminal contempt proceedings\nin terms of human beings and the effect\nit is compliance-not vengeance-that\nhours and 31 minutes.\nin Federal courts the basic right of trial\nof our laws upon them.\nthe Senate seeks.\nIn all the history of the Senate, I doubt\nby jury.\nAnd we shail never get rid of a run-\nIt may be that experience will demon-\nwhether there has ever been a debate\nOn this point, let US be absclutels clear,\nning sore in the body politic until we\nstrate the need for change in this meas-\nwhich has been conducted on a higher\nand let the record be clear.\nstart thinking in those terms.\nure. That is one of the reasons why we\nlevel. Senators have spoken to the\nNo Federal judge ill be required to\nTwo months ago, I had grave misgiv-\nare voting to create a commission.\npoint. Senators have debated the issues.\na jury to enfors complinice with\nings about the value of the commission\nDut the possible necessity for change\nSenators have stuck to the facts. For\nhis orders. He cas resort to fines, to\nsection. It nemed to me that a com-\nis no bar to action. The Senate will not\nthis, all my colleagues are entitled to\nimpriconment, and to conpensatory\nin a heated political\ndamages to compet to his\ndo nothing but\ndisappear after the vote tonight. We\ngreat credit.\nshall be present throughout the years to\nNATIONAL LEGISLATION\norders.\ninflame passions.\ncome.\nThe one thing a Vedere1 could\nBut I believe the Senate has set a tone\nThere will be some, of course, who will\nI shall vote for the bill. It is effec-\nnot do without a jury is to trass man\nwithin which the commission can be a\ntive legislation. It is enforceable leg-\nseek to play politics. Eut I hope there\na criminal in the cyes of al' his fellow\nuseful instrument. It can gather facts\nare none such in the Senate. There is\nislation. It seeks to advance the rights\ncitizens.\ninstead of charges; it can sift cut the\nof all Americans. It is national rather\nno compelling need for a campaign issue.\nSeventh, and finally, the bill secures\ntruth from the fancies; and it can return\nBut there is a compelling need for a\nthan sectional.\nwithout discrimination the right of all\nwith recommendations which will be of\nsolution that will enable all American\nIn the past few days there has been\ncitizens, of all races, all cclors, and all\nassistance to reaconable men.\nconsiderable discussion about the things\npeople to live in dignity and in unity.\ncreeds, to serve on Federal juries.\nwhich the bill does not do. The minority\nPOUTICS es PROGRESS\nThis bill is the greatest step toward that\nleader has just made some reference to\nAN ADVANCE\nThere are, et course, people who are\nobjective that has ever been made.\nMr. President, I have served in Con-\nTo\nit now would be a trogedy\nthem. I ain aware of the fact that the\nstill more d in securing \"otes\nthan in securi right to vote. There\nthe\n11 mant our consciences for\nbill does not pretend to solve all the\ngress for more than 20 years. A long line\nproblems of human relations.\nof Texas Senators have preceded me,\nare, of cours ple who are still nore\nyo:\nBut I cannot follow the logic of those\nclear back to 1371, when my State once\ninterested in the issue than in a solation\nA & AND JUST SENATE\nwho say that because we cannot solve\nagain received representation in the\nh he issue.\nI am aware of the implications of my\nall the problems, we should not try to\nSenate.\nSus T of whatever experi-\nvote. It will be treated cynically in\nsolve any of them. That is a curious\nThe last reconstruction statute was\nence I case there is no :\nsome quarters, and it will be misunder-\nprocess of thought, indeed.\npassed in 1875. Since that date, this is-\nical capital in tias issue. Nothing last-\nstcod in others. No Texas Scnator has\nsue has been agitated and has divided\nA STRONG BILL\ning, nothing enduring, has ever men\ncast a vote to consider a civil-rights bill\nour Nation time and time again. Dur-\nborn from hatred and prejudice-exce\nor a vote for a civil-rights bill since 1375.\nI prefer, instead, to consider what the\ning the 32 years since reconstruction,\nmore hatred and more prejudice.\nEut the Senate has dealt fairly and\nbill does, and then to make up my mind\npractically any one of the points I have\nPolitical ambition which feeds off\njustly with this measure. This is legis-\nas to its value on that basis. In this con-\nenumerated would have been regarded\nhatred of the North or hatred of the\nlation which I believe will be good for\ncluding hour, let us look at what the\nas a history-making advance. The Sen-\nSouth is doomed to frustration.\nevery State of the Union-and so far as\nbill does.\nate, without regard to political division,\nThere have been times when feelings\nI am cencerned, Temos has been a part\nFirst. The bill creates a Civil Rights\nis going to be in a position to approve\nran high. There was a time when the\nof the Union since Appomattox.\nCommission with subpena power. This\nseven of them, I hope, tonight.\ndivisions within this country exploded\nI could not have voted for the bill\nalone would justify terming the bill a\nI can understand the disappointment\ninto bloodshed.\nwhich came to the Senate, and I so told\nconstructive step, and it is more than\nof those who are not receiving all they\nbelieve they should out of this bill. I\nWhen Texas was readmitted into the\nthe Senate. But the bill now before the\nproponents of civil rights asked the ma-\ncan understand but not sympathize with\nUnion on March 30, 1870, two Senators\nSenate seeks to solve the problems of\njority leader to have passed last year.\ntook the seats once occupied by Rusk\n1957-not to reopen the wounds of 1865.\nSecond. The bill creates the office of\ntheir position.\nand Sam Houston. The judgments of\nThis is the result of honest and candid\na new Assistant Attorncy General who\nMany times in my life, I have failed to\nthose new Senators were not the judg-\ndebate in the greatest deliberative body\ncan bring the full prestige of his office\nsecure all that I considered proper and\njust and due. But I have learned to\n435793-63471\ninto the field of civil rights.\n435793-63471\n(2)"
}