Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
266848723
label
NSSM 202 [2 of 3]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
266848723
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
fc5a7efcf1bdcfad
ocrText
WITHDRAWAL SHEET (PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES) FORM OF DOCUMENT CORRESPONDENTS OR TITLE DATE RESTRICTION / From: NSSM 202 Study Gouy md. A Report 2 Gathright to Chair- NSC under Secretaries 12/2/74 A Memo Committee w/attach. 3 Distribution Lists 5/23/74 A Memo FILE LOCATION NSC H-Files Box H-205 Folder 2 RESTRICTION CODES (A) Closed by applicable Executive order governing access to national security information. (B) Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document. (C) Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gift. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION at the Richard Nixon Presidential I ibrary NA 14029 (1-98) DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS PROJECT DOCUMENT CONTROL RECORD ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS FILE FOLDER A RESTRICTED DOCUMENT OR CASE FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS FILE FOLDER. FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THE ITEM REMOVED AND THE REASON FOR ITS REMOVAL, CONSULT DOCUMENT ENTRY NUMBER / ON EITHER THE DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD (GSA FORM 7292 OR NA FORM 1421) OR NARA WITHDRAWAL SHEET (GSA FORM 7122) LOCATED IN THE FRONT OF THIS FILE FOLDER. A sanitized copy substituted for an original item which Contains information restricted under the Privacy Act. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION NLN FORM 101 (revised 6-85) Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified 4578 department OF STATE Washington, D.C. 20520 NPT FILE NSC UNDER SECRETARIES COMMITTEE 396 SECRET NSC-U/SM-13D October 3, 1974 TO: The Deputy Secretary of Defense The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs The Director of Central Intelligence The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff The Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission The Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency The Director, US Information Agency SUBJECT: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NSSM-202) The attached revised draft Memorandum for the President and the revised study which it transmits are forwarded for your comments and/or concurrence which may be telephoned to Mr. Jerome Kahan, Department of State, 632-8995. These revisions reflect comments received on the pre- vious version of the study and also incorporate new issues which have surfaced during the past few months. Your response is requested by c.o.b. Wednesday, October 16, 1974. Brandon Grove, Jr. Staff Director Attachments: As stated SECRET GDS Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified 10/1/74 DRAFT SECRET NSC UNDER SECRETARIES COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT Subject: U.S. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Policy NSSM 202 directed a review of present U.S. policy con- cerning non-proliferation and the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in light of the Indian nuclear test. A recently up- dated NSSM 156 study is a companion paper that focuses on the specific options open to us in dealing with India. The policy recommendations in NSDM 255 concerning the need for multilateral supplier controls over transfers of nuclear materials, technology, and equipment, have been taken into account in this review. On the basis of the review done pursuant to NSSM 202, the Under Secretaries Committee, recognizing that the pro- liferation problem is at a crucial juncture, recommends an intensified program to inhibit the further spread of in- dependent nuclear explosives capabilities. This program would exploit the common interest of many key countries in inhibiting proliferation by providing for concerted action. The U.S. could both support such action and, where appropriate, catalyze more effective international coordination. SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified SECRET 2 In the short run, the most effective approach to slowing down the spread of nuclear weapons is for the advanced nuclear industrial states to tighten controls on weapons-grade material and related production capabilities. Proliferation can also be limited through maintaining and making more widely applicable the legal and political barriers to acquisition of national weapons capabilities. In addition to the policy actions presented below, a successful non-proliferation strategy will be affected by perceptions of non-nuclear weapon states regarding progress in U.S.-Soviet nuclear arms limitations and particularly by the confidence of these states that their security needs can continue to be met without recourse to independent forces. As a series of near-term non-proliferation steps, it is recommended that: 1. Through consultations with nuclear industrial states, particularly the USSR and France, and a conference of such states, the U.S. pursue coordinated policies designed to: -- Ensure that international safeguards are both effective and widely applied to peaceful international nuclear cooperation by seeking to strengthen the political, financial, and technical base of the IAEA safeguarás program, and by requiring that such safeguards be placed on nuclear material and equipment exported by these states or material derived from these exports, SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified SECRET 3 consistent with guidelines issued by the Zangger (Nuclear Exporters') Committee. -- Restrict the spread of independent national uranium enrichment and chemical reprocessing facilities through: (a) reaching common principles regarding the supply of sensitive enrichment technology and equipment or supply or assistance in the construction of national reprocessing facilities; and (b) encouraging multilateral plants capable of satisfying future world demands for reliable and economic commercial services in these fields. In this connection, non-proliferation considerations should be factored into the review of U.S. policy with respect to future availability and supply or uranium enrichment services. - Impose special conditions on nuclear exports to coun- tries in sensitive regions, such as the Middle East, in order to minimize the accumulation of plutonium and other special nuclear material. -- Establish specific physical security standards to be included as a condition of nuclear cooperation, and strengthen international efforts to achieve widespread adoption of mean- ingful physical security measures on nuclear material. In this connection, a physical security convention, drafted by the IAEA, should receive U.S. support. SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified SECRET 4 -- Minimize the risk of indigenous "peaceful" nuclear explosive (PNE) development in non-nuclear weapons states not party to the NPT through: (a) agreeing not in any way to assist any NNWS to develop or acquire PNEs; (b) requiring explicit confirmation that nuclear material exported, or derived from the use of exports, will not be used for any nuclear explosives; (c) establishing that all nuclear materials subject to IAEA safeguards may not be used for any nuclear explosives; and (d) agreeing on the need to establish within the IAEA framework further mechanisms for the assessment of PNE applications and the provision of PNE services by nuclear-weapon states, 2. In conjunction with other NPT proponents, the U.S. intensify efforts in support of the treaty and in seeking early ratification by key non-nuclear weapons states, through: -- Support for the FRG, UK and other European countries in their high-level contacts with the Italian Government to convey both the importance of early NPT ratification and the relationship of such ratification to the ability of NPT parties to continue nuclear supplies to the European Communities. -- High-level communications with the Japanese designed to remove any doubt about the continued importance of such ratification to the U.S. and other NPT proponents as an essential contribution to international stability and long- SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified SECRET 5 term progress toward nuclear arms control, and as helping to ensure a maximum role for Japan in international nuclear commerce and at the NPT Review Conference in May 1975. --- Appropriate actions designed to achieve ratification by other prospective NPT participants, and encouragement of a common recognition by nations unlikely to adhere to the treaty in the near-term that the further spread of independent nuclear explosives capabilities endangers the security of all states. --- Establishment of visible ways, consistent with the policies set forth in recommendation 1 above, in which preferential treatment will be given to NPT parties in such areas as: (a) the availability of commercial nuclear facilities, fuels, and technological support; (b) potential PNE services; and possibly (c) credit terms. In connection with PNE services, the U.S. should continue to support an active IAEA role and take a more positive stance with respect to implementing Article V of the NPT, but be prepared to highlight the limitations as well as the potential benefits of PNEs. -- Completion of negotiations with the IAEA on the agreement implementing the Presidential offer to permit the IAEA to apply safeguards to U.S. facilities in order to facilitate ratification by FRG, Japan, and others by demon- strating that the U.S. is not seeking a commercial advantage. SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified SECRET 6 3. Coordinated multilateral approaches to be developed to ensure that the Indian nuclear explosion does not hasten further proliferation in Pakistan and elsewhere, by: -- Endeavoring to persuade India to place IAEA safe- guards on its nuclear exports and not to export nuclear ex- plosive technology or devices, or assist others in building national chemical reprocessing plants. --- Seeking to dissuade India from undermining the NPT and deferral of any further Indian explosive tests, parti- cularly in the period prior to the Review Conference. --- Avoiding the implication that India's status as a world power has been substantially enhanced as a result of its nuclear test. - Seeking to hold India to its peaceful protestations and minimize the scope, pace, and military dimensions of its nuclear explosive program, through Indian acceptance of such measures as: (a) accountability for weapons-grade material; (b) deferral of further PNE production and limiting it to specified current needs; and (c) international obser- vation arrangements. --- Seeking Soviet and French cooperation in continuing not to supply India with long-range bombers or other sophisticated nuclear delivery capabilities. SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified SECRET 7 4. The Under Secretaries Committee should continue to coordinate, review, and report on non-proliferation policy actions and plans, and conduct relevant studies needed to support our efforts in this field. -- Urgent attention should be paid to further defining a U.S. policy on preferential treatment and to exploring the question of security assurances in time for the NPT Review Conference. - Studies should be made of sanctions as a deterrent to proliferation, the use of financing as a supplementary vehicle for imposing safeguards conditions on nuclear exports, and the possibility of multilateral controls on sophisticated nuclear delivery systems. -- A series of "country studies" should be launched to investigate in detail the factors affecting potential nuclear weapons decisions in key NNWS, the preferred strategy for deterring such decisions, and options for the U.S. in the event these states acquire independent nuclear explosives. ----- The implications of Congressional concerns and actions for future U.S. policy on nuclear cooperation and non- proliferation should be examined. SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified Draft 10/1/74 SECRET NSSM 202 STUDY Executive Summary U.S. NON-PROLIFERATION POLICY In response to NSSM 202, the Under Secretaries Com- mittee has prepared the attached study which reviews U.S. policy concerning non-proliferation and the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). A NSSM 156 study, updated in light of the Indian nuclear test, is a companion paper that focuses on the specific options and courses open to us in our dealings with India. Desirability and Feasibility of Non-Proliferation Inhibiting the spread of nuclear weapons has been a consistent and important element of U.S. policy for the entire nuclear era. The basis for our non-proliferation interest is the assessment that the danger of nuclear war as well as world instability would significantly increase with an unrestrained spread of nuclear weapons. Acquisition of nuclear weapons would also give nations a sense of greater independence, thus complicating international diplomacy, diminishing American influence, and possibly eventually re- quiring extensive and costly restructuring of our defense posture. With additional nuclear weapons states (NWS), it would become more difficult to negotiate international arms control agreements, and progress in limiting the bilateral U.S.-USSR competition would be substantially complicated. Further spread of nuclear weapons would also provide in- creased opportunity for sub-national theft and blackmail. Finally, unless the risk that peaceful nuclear programs might be used to initiate weapons programs can be minimized, all nations will face security dangers and the continued expansion of international nuclear commerce could be threatened. The problem of preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and independent explosives capabilities is now at a crucial stage. Commercial nuclear power generation is coming into wider use throughout the world, stimulated by the energy crisis, and many industrialized nations are becoming sup- pliers of nuclear material and equipment. Particularly SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified SECRET 2 as a result of the Indian nuclear test, other non-nuclear weapon states may rethink their decisions regarding the acquisition of nuclear explosives. We are in general en- tering a period when political barriers to non-proliferation appear to be weakening, given movements toward a multipolar world and decreasing credibility with respect to security guarantees. These trends could adversely affect the future of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), through setbacks in the ratification process in Japan and the European Com- munity countries, by reducing the longer-term efficacy of the treaty as a non-proliferation instrument. Nevertheless, the Under Secretaries Committee has con- cluded that a policy aimed at deterring further proliferation can be effectively pursued without incurring significant costs or risks. In virtually all the important non-nuclear weapon states (NNWS) there is presently a lack of either the capability or the motivation to develop nuclear explosives. This offers the opportunity to undertake policies aimed at deterring further nuclear proliferation through practical measures which can (i) deny non-nuclear states the full range of materials and equipment needed to produce nuclear ex- plosives, and (ii) strengthen the political, legal, and security inhibitions against proliferation. The nuclear material, equipment, and technology needed to produce nuclear weapons are still available only from a limited number of suppliers who generally oppose proliferation. Although it is essential that our supplier position and diplomatic influence be brought to bear, the U.S. cannot by itself establish an effective and durable non-proliferation regime. Such a program requires intensified concerted action, building upon existing international and multilateral mech- anisms, to exploit the common non-proliferation interests of key NWS and NNWS. The USC recognizes that we might only be able to delay further proliferation, however determined our anti-proliferation efforts may be, but concludes that U.S. national security objectives can be well served even with a non-proliferation strategy that is only partially effective. It would be desirable to defer the disadvantages associated with an ex- panded number of nuclear powers as long as possible, while seeking to create conditions which might ultimately check such expansion. At the same time, prudence dictates that the U.S. should begin to explore the problem of how to shape our security posture in a world environment of larger numbers SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified SECRET 3 of independent nuclear states as a means of hedging against the failure to contain fully the further spread of nuclear weapons capabilities. This study emphasizes concerted efforts designed to curb the spread of nuclear weapons, consisting of concrete actions to contain technical capabilities, to strengthen legal, political, and security inhibitions, and to deal with the special issue of peaceful nuclear explosives (PNEs). These measures, which are summarized below, involve reliance on certain basic functional tools, such as IAEA safeguards, export controls, and the NPT, as well as approaches tailored to key countries. However, the success of a non-proliferation policy will depend in large part on whether NNWS believe that their security and political needs can continue to be met without recourse to independent nuclear forces. It will also depend on their perceptions regarding progress in U.S.-Soviet arms limitations. Thus, our overall foreign and defense policy, the relative stability of regions of potential conflict in the world, and the general structure of peace in the international system have an important bear- ing on the longer-term prospects for limiting the spread of nuclear weapons. Containing Technical Capabilities All manufacturers of commercial nuclear equipment and material, except France (and potentially India), are either NPT parties or signatories moving toward ratification, and support efforts to standardize safeguards appli- cations. France has publicly declared that it will behave as if it were a party to the NPT, but it has apparently been lax in practice in adhering to this position in its nuclear export policy and has been reluctant to cooperate with other suppliers in developing export guidelines. There are signs, however, that the new French Government might be interested in adopting a more positive safeguards policy. Although this generally favorable situation will deteriorate to some extent in coming years, as NNWS acquire greater technical capabilities, it provides potential leverage for limiting the availability of weapons-grade material and technologies through nuclear export controls and international safeguards. Despite its apparent nega- tive thrust, this approach can benefit all users of peace- ful nuclear energy by permitting material and equipment to SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified SECRET 4 be made available within a framework of credible and effective safeguards controls. Furthermore, selective con- trols over international transfers of delivery vehicles and related technologies could be effective in dissuading cer- tain major powers from embarking on an independent nuclear arms program. The U.S. is still the dominant international supplier of nuclear power plants and fuel, but our leverage in the international commercial nuclear field is diminishing. Loss of U.S. dominance in the peaceful nuclear area could allow customers to deal with other suppliers who impose less rigorous controls on sensitive material, equipment, and technology. Accordingly, there is now an urgent need to upgrade our safeguards and control policies and to con- sult with other nuclear suppliers on this matter.* Although informal contacts and the use of existing multilateral mechanisms should continue to be pursued, a conference of nuclear industrialized states would provide a unique op- portunity for realizing such a coordinated approach. A restricted conference attended by the major current and potential nuclear suppliers, namely the U.S., France, the USSR, Japan, the FRG, the UK, and Canada would appear to be a preferable first-step that could later lead to a L broader conference which included other nuclear industrial states. Soviet and French support of such an approach would be crucial and would dictate the need for advance consultations with both countries. The most important substantive non-proliferation objec- tives to be achieved in a program of consultation and co- ordination among commercial nuclear suppliers can be sum- marized as follows: 1. Ensure that IAEA safeguards are applied to exports of nuclear equipment and material to NNWS, particularly states who are not NPT parties, and strengthen the poli- tical, financial, and technical base of the IAEA's safeguards program. Of immediate importance would be gaining widest possible acceptance of the Zangger Committee export guide- lines as well as agreed procedures for codifying, implement- ing, and modifying these guidelines. Consideration should *NSDM 255 authorized consultations with other nuclear suppliers with the aim of minimizing risks of commercial nuclear transfers of sensitive material and technology. SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS PROJECT DOCUMENT CONTROL RECORD ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS FILE FOLDER A RESTRICTED DOCUMENT OR CASE FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS FILE FOLDER. FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THE ITEM REMOVED AND THE REASON FOR ITS REMOVAL, CONSULT DOCUMENT ENTRY NUMBER 2 ON EITHER THE DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD (GSA FORM 7292 OR NA FORM 1421) OR NARA WITHDRAWAL SHEET (GSA FORM 7122) LOCATED IN THE FRONT OF THIS FILE FOLDER. A sanitized copy substituted for an original item which Contains information restricted under the Privacy Act. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION NLN FORM 101 (revised 6-85) Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified 740 2064 NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20506 SECRET - GDS May 23, 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 202 TO: The Secretary of Defense The Deputy Secretary of State The Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency The Director of Central Intelligence The Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission SUBJECT: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty The President has directed a review of U.S. policy concerning the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The study should review present U.S. policy concerning non-proliferation and the NPT in the light of changed conditions since completion of NSSM 13, and, in particular, in light of India's announcement of its underground nuclear test. The study should consider the full range of issues posed by the changed circumstances affecting our posture toward non-proliferation and the NPT and present options for future U.S. policy. It also should consider specifically whether the U.S. should press for renewed support for the treaty by those now party to it and accession to the treaty by those not yet signators, and if so how and to what extent. The options should include consideration of public, congressional and diplomatic posture for the U.S. The study should take into account the study done in response to NSSM 13 and subsequent work in connection therewith, particularly that in preparation for the 1975 NPT Review Conference. It also should take into account the work done in connection with NSSM 195 and the updating currently underway in connection with NSSM 156. The President has directed that the study be accomplished by the NSC Under Secretaries Committee and be forwarded not later than June 12, 1974. Kissinger CC: The Chairman, Under Secretaries Committee The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff SECRET - GDS Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS PROJECT DOCUMENT CONTROL RECORD ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS FILE FOLDER A RESTRICTED DOCUMENT OR CASE FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS FILE FOLDER. FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THE ITEM REMOVED AND THE REASON FOR ITS REMOVAL, CONSULT DOCUMENT ENTRY NUMBER 3 ON EITHER THE DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD (GSA FORM 7292 OR NA FORM 1421) OR NARA WITHDRAWAL SHEET (GSA FORM 7122) LOCATED IN THE FRONT OF THIS FILE FOLDER. A sanitized copy substituted for an original item which Contains information restricted under the Privacy Act. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION NLN FORM 101 (revised 6-85) Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified 2064 LOG #: NSC DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENT RECORD DATE: 5/23/74 CABLE #: NSSM 202 Nuc oliferation Treaty EMO/LETTER: SUBJECT: LASSIFICATION: SECRET/GDS TO: (CABLES ON TERNAL DISTRIBUTION: MR COOPER SECRETARY KISSINGER MR BUSHNELL GEN SCOWCROFT MAJ MCFARLANE MR OBER 2' MR CLIFT MR JANKA 1 MR SAUNDERS MR FROEBE MR FAZIO MR SOLOMON MR QUANDT 10 MRS DAVIS MR APPLEBAUM MR QUINN MR STEARMAN MR BARNUM 1 MISS FARRAR MR KENNEDY MR SMYSER LTC STUKEL MR SMITH 1 MR LODAL 1 DR ELLIOTT MR HUBERMÄN MR GUHIN COL BOVERIE MR MOE CMDR HIGGINS MR LOW MR POWERS MR HORAN MR LEHMAN EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: Addresee #Cys Date Time Recipient VICE-PRESIDENT SECRETARY OF STATE DEPUTY SEC. OF STATE 1 (Exec. Secretariat) 7224 5/21/74 1755 Jame Holland SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1 DEPUTY SEC. OF DEFENSE CHAIRMAN, JCS 1 DIRECTOR, CIA 1 Syrone Chairman, AEC 1 Room 1154 - 1717 H Street 5-24-74 Dircctor, ACDA 1 5/24/74 1:00 m. Holm Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED. This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON SECRET MEMORANDUM FOR: THE PRESIDENT FROM: HENRY A. KISSINGER SUBJECT: NSSM on Nuclear Non-Proliferation In the light of the explosion of a nuclear device in India, it would be useful to review our policy toward the broad question of nuclear non- proliferation and the particular question of what we might do in support of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The last compre- hensive look at these questions was done in 1969. RECOMMENDATION: That you authorize me to sign the attached NSSM to update studies related to non-proliferation. APPROVE DISAPPROVE SECRET - GDS Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified 2064 MEMORANDUM NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL SECRET ACTION May 21, 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR: BRENT SCOWCROFT FROM: RICHARD T. KENNEDY Me SUBJECT: NPT NSSM Mr. Kissinger requested a study of the non-proliferation program. It should be a comprehensive review of the non-proliferation program. The NSSM 156 update on the Indian Nuclear Developments appropriately focuses more specifically on the Indian issue itself. I have discussed the approach with State (Lord, Grove and Eagleburger). We all agree that the way to most effectively get what is needed and what HAK wants is to let the NSSM 156 exercise go forward, and while at the same time drawing on it and other work, go to the broader question of the worldwide implications for our policy. The Under Secretaries Committee is the place to do the latter -- it did the job the first time around and handled several subsidiary issues following the initial study in 1969. RECOMMENDATION That you sign the memorandum to the President at Tab I. Mr. Elliot and Mr. Huberman concur. SECRET Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified MEMORANDUM NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVELY CONFIDENTIAL May 24, 1974 W/ SECRET ATTACHMENTS MEMORANDUM FOR: MRS DAVIS FROM MAC SUBJECT: Precedence Problems At Tab A is a memo dispatched last night w/incorrect ordering of the addressees, i.e. the SECDEF is behind the DEP SEC STATE. We didn't ask for a redo, and resigning, as General Scowcroft has NO signature matrix, and because of the 6 day suspense. Because of only two addressees, the Dep Sec State received the ORIGINAL, while the SECDEF received a xerox copy! We can well hear a small noise about this from Latimer, et al. (The ACTING SEC STATE would be o.k. for # 1 position!) At Tab B is a signed NSSM, which either you or Dick Kennedy have for processing. The addressees are HOPELESSLY out of precedence! I can't figure what source this came from. It should be retyped, and resigned, prior to dispatch. At Tab C is SP 48 on rank order for easy referral RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Bite the bullet on Tab A - leave as is. 2. Redo Tab B (P.S. check rank order of info addees). 3. Return this so we can brief the secretary who typed these. I really can't expect the substantive staff to check out addressee precedence! Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified NSC/SP-48 April 5, 1974 STAFF PROCEDURE RANK ORDER LISTING OF U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS The following is a revised rank order listing of U.S. Government officials provided as guidance for the listing of addressees of NSSM's, NSDM's and other NSC or White House memoranda. This SP supersedes the memo- randum on the same subject, March 9, 1974. The Secretary of State (Alternate: Acting Secretary of State*) The Secretary of the Treasury The Secretary of Defense The Attorney General The Secretary of the Interior The Secretary of Agriculture The Secretary of Commerce The Secretary of Labor The Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development The Secretary of Transportation The Director, Office of Management and Budget The Deputy Secretary of State The Deputy Secretary of Defense The Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency The Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers The Director of Central Intelligence The Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission The Director of the Federal Energy Office Assistant to the President for International Economic Affairs * Acting Secretary of State should be clearly identified and so listed at Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library the top of the action addressees DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20506 SECRET - GDS National Security Study Memorandum TO: 1 The Secretary of Defense should 5 The Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission 4 2 The The Deputy Director Secretary of Central of Intelligence State (or "ACTING" then # 3 The Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency SUBJECT: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty The President has directed a review of U.S. policy concerning the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The study should review present U.S. policy concerning non-proliferation and the NPT in the light of changed conditions since completion of NSSM 13, and, in particular, in light of India's announcement of its underground nuclear test. The study should consider the full range of issues posed by the changed circumstances affecting our posture toward non-proliferation and the NPT and present options for future U.S. policy. It also should consider specifically whether the U.S. should press for renewed support for the treaty by those now party to it and accession to the treaty by those not yet signators, and if so how and to what extent. The options should include consideration of public, congressional and diplomatic posture for the U.S. The study should take into account the study done in response to NSSM 13 and subsequent work in connection therewith, particularly that in preparation for the 1975 NPT Review Conference. It also should take into account the work done in connection with NSSM 195 and the updating currently underway in connection with NSSM 156. The President has directed that the study be accomplished by the NSC Under Secretaries Committee and be forwarded not later than June 12, 1974. Henry A. Kissinger CC: The Chairman, Under Secretaries Committee The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff SECRET GDS Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON SECRET (XGDS) May 23, 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR ? Should ACTING 2 THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE 1 THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE SUBJECT: Military Supply Policy Toward Pakistan The Department of State memorandum S/S 7403441 of February 20, 1974, concerning the treatment of certain categories of items under our existing military supply toward India and Pakistan, has been considered. The Departments of State and Defense are authorized to continue to apply the criteria described in the second of the three options presented in that memorandum, pending a further review of this matter. To facilitate a further review and decision, the Departments are requested to prepare a memorandum examining two additional aspects of this issue: --Analysis should be provided as to the types and quantities of items that might be expected to flow to each of the two countries under each of the three possible courses of action outlined in the memo. The question of whether "components" and "accessories and attachments" should all be treated under identical criteria should be considered. A memorandum amplifying the Department of State's memorandum of February 20, 1974, and examining the foregoing issues should be sub- mitted by May 30, 1974, for consideration by the President. Brent Scowcroit Major General, USAF Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs XGDS - 3 DECLAS - Date Impossible to Determine roduced at the Ridbard Nixbe Presidential Libiarys inger DECLASSIFIED Divisnat pursuant to Executive Order P3526 artohas to berdedassified DOC RECD LOG NBR INITIAL ACTION o NSC CORRESPONDENCE PRO LE MO DA MO DA HR 5 21 5 21 19 7402064 FROM: Kennedy REFERENCE: CIRCLE AS APPROPRIATE TO: PRES S/S UNCLAS LOG IN/OUT SOURCE/CLASS/DESCRIPTION kissinger COLBY, W OTHER LOU NO FORN NODIS SCOWCROFT x SCHLESINGER, J C EYES ONLY EXDIS DAVIS ST EX SEC S CODEWORD SUBJE D' non Prolipation Treaty TS SENSITIVE Alssm INTERNAL ROUTING AND DISTRIBUTION REC ACTION REQUIRED ACTION INFO CY ADVANCE CYS TO HAK/SCOWCROFT FOR MEMO FOR HAK ( ) STAFF SECRETARY MEMO FOR PRES ( ) REPLY FOR FAR EAST ( ) SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA APPROPRIATE ACTION ( ) DISTRIBUTION/INITIAL ACTION ASGMT MID EAST / NO. AFRICA / so. ASIA MEMO TO ( ) RECOMMENDATIONS ( EUROPE / CANADA ) LATIN AMERICA JOINT MEMO ( ) REFER TO FOR: ( ) UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC ANY ACTION NECESSARY? ( ) SCIENTIFIC CONCURRENCE ( ) program ANALYSIS DUE DATE: NSC PLANNING COMMENTS: (INCLUDING SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS) CONGRESSIONAL OCEANS POLICY INTELLIGENCE Indy DATE FROM TO S 5/21 Shift X Pres /x for deasion (5/30) SUBSEQUENT ACTION REQUIRED (OR TAKEN): CY TO 5/23 NSC/S Scowcroft 39d Nasm for Pres SUBSEQUENT ROUTING/ACTIONS 5/23 DAVIS S Distribution $ Dispatch (5/30) 5/24 Davis NSC/S C Distubuted 5/2/11 /seiD" sheet DISPATCH MICROFILM & FILE RQMTS: CY RQMTS: SEE ABOVE PLUS: NSC/S DISP INSTR NOTIFY & DATE BY M/F'D BY special DISPOSITION: MAY 281974 SF CROSS REF W/ HP NS SUSPENSE CY ATTACHED: X FOLDER: CLOSE Aoc WH EP Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library PA DY DECLASSIFIED (NBC-74-21) This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified MEMORANDUM NSSM 202 NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL SECRET/GDS June 12, 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR: JEANNE DAVIS FROM: MICHAEL GUHIN my THRU: DAVID ELLIOTT SUBJECT: Extension of NSSM Due Dates As discussed with you yesterday: -- The due date for NSSM 202, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, should be extended from Friday, June 14 to Friday, June 21, 1974; and -- The due date for NSSM 194, Review of Certain Conventional Weapons, should be extended from July 3 to August 16. I have discussed this with Dick Kennedy and the key interested agencies. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That you inform State (Brandon Grove) by phone that the due date for the NSSM 202 report on the Non-Proliferation Treaty is extended to June 21, 1974. 2. That you sign the memorandum at Tab A extending the due date for NSSM 194. SECRET/GDS Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified SECRET UNITED STATES ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR May 28, 1974 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Jerome Kahan, S/P Co-Chairman, NSSM 202 SUBJECT: Brandon Grove's Memorandum of May 23 on the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, NSSM 202 As you know, Mr. Charles Van Doren, of ACDA, has been designated Co-Chairman of the subject study. Mil chistster A. M. Christopher Special Assistant CC: The Deputy Secretary of Defense The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs The Director of Central Intelligence The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff The Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission CLASSIFIED BY A. M. Christopher SUBJECT TO GENERAL DECLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 11652 AUTOMATICALLY DOWNGRADED AT TWO YEAR INTERVALS AND DECLASSIFIED ON DEC. 31, 1982 GOD Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DECLASSIFIED This document has been reviewed pursuant to Executive Order 13526 and has been determined to be declassified