Ask the Scholar

Page 41 of 82
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 41

OCR

TELCON Jos. Kraft/Kissinger 2/11/70 KAK: Elliott Richardson called me and said he was going to call you about that article. I said I have already done it. K: I misunderstood. He just mentioned it to me. HAK: I don't give him the content of my conversations. Hewas going to call you and aay it was unfar. I thought I was keeping him off your back. K: I wanted you to know that I was mystified but I was ready to wait. I don't undeestand your relationship on this issue with the President. HAK: I can't provide a check list on what I recommend and what I don't. When I know a Presidential view then I have to see that it gets full consideration in the bureaucracy. Not that no other view can get consideration but that view must have my options. Whatever you want, , I cannot state a personal view different from the President K: That's what you were doing. HAK: I don't remember I was trying ? ? ? ? and a rational for our program. They were only a partial explanation of what he is doing. He was asked about area defesne which was unfortunate. K: He was asked HAK: If they had been anticipated he should have given the whole rationale. The problem arose that he had changed his rationale back to Sentinel without the Sentinel circumstances. The second point he wanted to convey, I don't know if you have talked with Paul Doty, ? ? ? ? the going into the issue. K: Do you know Paul's views? HAK: Yes, and they are hostile. I enormously respect him. They would be opposed. I can safely say his view would be to hold up. K: Of course AHK:: I wanted to make the point that Paul agreed K: I wanted you to know that he and others had not given you a frank opinion, and it bothered them. They felt it had been fuzzed over.

Page data

Page
41
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
aa442a50ed79ca0c
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
498693759
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "498693759",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693759",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "February 9-18, 1970",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693759",
    "collections": [
        "National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 82,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "498693759",
    "label": "February 9-18, 1970",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693759"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "498693759",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693759",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "February 9-18, 1970",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693759",
    "collections": [
        "National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 82,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693759",
    "naId": 498693759,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 41,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-04-03-041.jpg",
    "mediaId": "aa442a50ed79ca0c",
    "ocrText": "TELCON\nJos. Kraft/Kissinger\n2/11/70\nKAK: Elliott Richardson called me and said he was going to call you about\nthat article. I said I have already done it.\nK: I misunderstood. He just mentioned it to me.\nHAK: I don't give him the content of my conversations. Hewas going to call\nyou and aay it was unfar. I thought I was keeping him off your back.\nK: I wanted you to know that I was mystified but I was ready to wait. I don't\nundeestand your relationship on this issue with the President.\nHAK: I can't provide a check list on what I recommend and what I don't. When\nI know a Presidential view then I have to see that it gets full consideration in\nthe bureaucracy. Not that no other view can get consideration but that view\nmust have my options. Whatever you want, , I cannot state a personal view\ndifferent from the President\nK: That's what you were doing.\nHAK: I don't remember I was trying ? ? ? ? and a rational for our program.\nThey were only a partial explanation of what he is doing. He was asked about\narea defesne which was unfortunate.\nK: He was asked\nHAK: If they had been anticipated he should have given the whole rationale.\nThe problem arose that he had changed his rationale back to Sentinel without\nthe Sentinel circumstances. The second point he wanted to convey, I don't\nknow if you have talked with Paul Doty, ? ? ? ? the\ngoing into the\nissue.\nK: Do you know Paul's views?\nHAK: Yes, and they are hostile. I enormously respect him. They would be\nopposed. I can safely say his view would be to hold up.\nK: Of course\nAHK:: I wanted to make the point that Paul agreed\nK: I wanted you to know that he and others had not given you a frank opinion,\nand it bothered them. They felt it had been fuzzed over."
}