Ask the Scholar
Page 16 of 90
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
*
- 3 -
Dobrynin: No, it isn't new, it's a rather old one.
HAK: That's what I mean, that you hadn't seen on Friday.
Dobrynin: Yes, it's different from Firday.
HAK: That is the only one that's different. All the rest is the same.
Dobrynin: Yes, I agree with you.
HAK: I mean all the other points we put in Article 51 and I think in the
preamble we put back most of your language.
Dobrynin: Even by the end of the article you remember there
was a proposal made about
HAK: That we have our questions about.
Dobrynin: Yes, I understand. So this one would be discussed further but
this is really Article I
and really this second paragraph of Article I
Why couldn't you take it as it was on Friday.
HAK: Because Brankly because the British attach enormous importance
to that one sentence. Now they haven't seen this draft at all.
Dobrynin: ???
HAK:
Well, because they always tell usbecause this is the one clause if
we ever do this. This is the one clause to which they have always attached
importance. And it therefore would make it a lot easier to sell it if the
British would join us.
Dobrynin: But really this is
I understand your point but this is the point
which really Brezhnev today tries to convey to the President.
HAK: Well, we haven't discussed that particular formulation with them.
Dobrynin: Well, that's why you really should. That's why I called you
today in the morning - first we have to discuss between us and then
analyze so to speak, and then afterwards you could explain you own
allies view
HAK: But we have totally disregarded it. If we had taken a substantial
view of that and added to it, that's one thing. If we totally reject th-
then view
Page data
- Page
- 16
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 509a004c3de5f87d
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 498693973
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "498693973",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "April 2-6, 1973",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973",
"collections": [
"National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
"Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 90,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "498693973",
"label": "April 2-6, 1973",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "498693973",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "April 2-6, 1973",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973",
"collections": [
"National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
"Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 90,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973",
"naId": 498693973,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 16,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-016.jpg",
"mediaId": "509a004c3de5f87d",
"ocrText": "*\n- 3 -\nDobrynin: No, it isn't new, it's a rather old one.\nHAK: That's what I mean, that you hadn't seen on Friday.\nDobrynin: Yes, it's different from Firday.\nHAK: That is the only one that's different. All the rest is the same.\nDobrynin: Yes, I agree with you.\nHAK: I mean all the other points we put in Article 51 and I think in the\npreamble we put back most of your language.\nDobrynin: Even by the end of the article you remember there\nwas a proposal made about\nHAK: That we have our questions about.\nDobrynin: Yes, I understand. So this one would be discussed further but\nthis is really Article I\nand really this second paragraph of Article I\nWhy couldn't you take it as it was on Friday.\nHAK: Because Brankly because the British attach enormous importance\nto that one sentence. Now they haven't seen this draft at all.\nDobrynin: ???\nHAK:\nWell, because they always tell usbecause this is the one clause if\nwe ever do this. This is the one clause to which they have always attached\nimportance. And it therefore would make it a lot easier to sell it if the\nBritish would join us.\nDobrynin: But really this is\nI understand your point but this is the point\nwhich really Brezhnev today tries to convey to the President.\nHAK: Well, we haven't discussed that particular formulation with them.\nDobrynin: Well, that's why you really should. That's why I called you\ntoday in the morning - first we have to discuss between us and then\nanalyze so to speak, and then afterwards you could explain you own\nallies view\nHAK: But we have totally disregarded it. If we had taken a substantial\nview of that and added to it, that's one thing. If we totally reject th-\nthen view"
}