Ask the Scholar

Page 21 of 90
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 21

OCR

Telcon - San Clemente 4-2-73 p. m. HAK - Hal Sonnenfeldt HAK: Hal, I just talked to Dobrynin. He is shedding bitter tears over the phrase "conditions in which nuclear war would not be justified". I told him he should wait 24 hours before transmitting it; I'll talk to the President again, which doesn't mean that we'll have to change it. You know there is in fact an argument to be made that even if we are going to drop it out we could drop it out in Moscow. Sonnenfeldt: Well, I started to talk to you and I got off the subject. There is a real question you know on the way things are going now. What the hell you are going to do there. And there is a chance if we hang in there and tell them that this is just how its got to be that they may accpet it. HAK: And there is an advantage in showing the British we submitted it. Sonnenfeldt: Yes, because we're going to have a big problem when this thing surfaces SO we might as well show the agony that we went through. Because it's in there twice now, in the preamble and the article. HAK: Which is one reason why we could drop it from the article. Sonnenfeldt: Yes, I think though that their objection is largely bureaucratic and can't really be substantive because they got the first sentence and this thing is almost total logical. HAK: Well no, I think the trouble they have is that Gromyko had rejected that sentence when we put it in the declaration Sonnenfeldt: But then it was the SALT sentence. HAK: I know, but I can just see how will point out to him that we are sneaking back the sentence again. But can you think about just what the operational significance of that paragraph now is? Sonnenfeldt: The first paragraph? HAK: Yes, and let's talk about it tomorrow. Sonnenfeldt# OK.

Page data

Page
21
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
ae476fdfbfebeeb4
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
498693973
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "498693973",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "April 2-6, 1973",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973",
    "collections": [
        "National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 90,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "498693973",
    "label": "April 2-6, 1973",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "498693973",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "April 2-6, 1973",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973",
    "collections": [
        "National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 90,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693973",
    "naId": 498693973,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 21,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-19-06-021.jpg",
    "mediaId": "ae476fdfbfebeeb4",
    "ocrText": "Telcon - San Clemente\n4-2-73\np. m.\nHAK\n- Hal Sonnenfeldt\nHAK: Hal, I just talked to Dobrynin. He is shedding bitter tears over\nthe phrase \"conditions in which nuclear war would not be justified\".\nI told him he should wait 24 hours before transmitting it; I'll talk to\nthe President again, which doesn't mean that we'll have to change it.\nYou know there is in fact an argument to be made that even if we are\ngoing to drop it out we could drop it out in Moscow.\nSonnenfeldt: Well, I started to talk to you and I got off the subject. There\nis a real question you know on the way things are going now. What the hell\nyou are going to do there. And there is a chance if we hang in there and\ntell them that this is just how its got to be that they may accpet it.\nHAK: And there is an advantage in showing the British we submitted it.\nSonnenfeldt: Yes, because we're going to have a big problem when this\nthing surfaces SO we might as well show the agony that we went through.\nBecause it's in there twice now, in the preamble and the article.\nHAK: Which is one reason why we could drop it from the article.\nSonnenfeldt: Yes, I think though that their objection is largely bureaucratic\nand can't really be substantive because they got the first sentence and this\nthing is almost total logical.\nHAK: Well no, I think the trouble they have is that Gromyko had rejected\nthat sentence when we put it in the declaration\nSonnenfeldt: But then it was the SALT sentence.\nHAK: I know, but I can just see how\nwill point out to him that\nwe are sneaking back the sentence again. But can you think about just\nwhat the operational significance of that paragraph now is?\nSonnenfeldt: The first paragraph?\nHAK: Yes, and let's talk about it tomorrow.\nSonnenfeldt# OK."
}