Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 69
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

- 2 - K: And I don't think you really can do that. R: No I can't but I have refered to what you have told me already SO you will really be backing me up in a sense and repeating the substance of what I pareviously told Case and referred to at least in a general way yesterday and this is of course is their reason for you to be there in the hope of to just avert the risk that when they say that sentence they would feel that they really needed to get part of it from you as an second hand one from me. But I think the account you will give is one there has been some preparation for in their minds already or at least in cases SO I think you will give an explanation in a convincing way and apart from your own manner of accounting for it there is the what I think is a very compelling circumstantial extrinsic support for that version of it because it just isn't plausible that it would have happened any other way. K: Yeah. R: So, I think all of those things will help. This is what I believe to be kind of I don't really think they want to block this nomination. I think they've created what is in effect a symbolic issue over this and have gotten the due recognition of their prerogatives. I think they111 be disposed to let it go. K: Yeah. R: Case explained his motivation to me as being essentially being that of focusing enough attention on this SO that he would be XOnXiXiXbiXXX contributing to raising the threshold of sensitivity toward this kind of invasion of individual rights. He wouldn't argue that it was never justifiable he would only say that I want Kissinger and you XXXXX people to think more than twice about it and by going through all this I'm helping to make that point. I think that's the only point he wanted to make. K: Alright. Right. R: May I ask you one thing. In the recitation of the requests the only one that I remember that you are directly identified is Hedrick Smith. Could you say I've said in affect and I hope I'm right about this. I think I did check it with you earlier that Smith or anyone who published leak that you were acting your only role was to act in a manner consonant with the policy determination that had initially been made by the President in conference with Hoover. K: That's absolutely right.

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
72515f66d5f9ee82
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
498693999
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "498693999",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693999",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "September 11-13, 1973",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693999",
    "collections": [
        "National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 69,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "498693999",
    "label": "September 11-13, 1973",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693999"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "498693999",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693999",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "September 11-13, 1973",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693999",
    "collections": [
        "National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 69,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498693999",
    "naId": 498693999,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-22-02-002.jpg",
    "mediaId": "72515f66d5f9ee82",
    "ocrText": "- 2 -\nK:\nAnd I don't think you really can do that.\nR:\nNo I can't but I have refered to what you have told me already SO\nyou will really be backing me up in a sense and repeating the substance\nof what I pareviously told Case and referred to at least in a general way\nyesterday and this is of course is their reason for you to be there in the\nhope of to just avert the risk that when they say that sentence they\nwould feel that they really needed to get part of it from you as an\nsecond hand one from me. But I think the account you will give is\none there has been some preparation for in their minds already or\nat least in cases SO I think you will give an explanation in a convincing\nway and apart from your own manner of accounting for it there is the\nwhat I think is a very compelling circumstantial extrinsic support for\nthat version of it because it just isn't plausible that it would have\nhappened any other way.\nK:\nYeah.\nR:\nSo, I think all of those things will help. This is what I believe to be\nkind of\nI don't really think they want to block this nomination. I\nthink they've created what is in effect a symbolic issue over this\nand have gotten the due recognition of their prerogatives. I think\nthey111 be disposed to let it go.\nK:\nYeah.\nR:\nCase explained his motivation to me as being essentially being that\nof focusing enough attention on this SO that he would be XOnXiXiXbiXXX\ncontributing to raising the threshold of sensitivity toward this kind\nof invasion of individual rights. He wouldn't argue that it was never\njustifiable he would only say that I want Kissinger and you XXXXX\npeople to think more than twice about it and by going through all this\nI'm helping to make that point. I think that's the only point he wanted\nto make.\nK:\nAlright. Right.\nR:\nMay I ask you one thing. In the recitation of the requests the only\none that I remember that you are directly identified is Hedrick Smith.\nCould you say I've said in affect and I hope I'm right about this.\nI\nthink I did check it with you earlier that Smith or\nanyone\nwho published leak that you were acting\nyour only role was to\nact in a manner consonant with the policy determination that had\ninitially been made by the President in conference with Hoover.\nK:\nThat's absolutely right."
}