Ask the Scholar
Page 40 of 55
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Cranston - page 3
which one House of Congress could object to and thereafter the most
favored nation thing would be subject X approval or disapproval each two years
so that Congress would have that right to take a look every two years and the
governing what we should take into account woul include the following
section D and this is really the meat of the
When considering such
a resolution of disapproval, the Congress shall take into account whether such
country is evidencing resonable progress and or is not retregressing from the
observance of principles of human rights set forth in Section 402 which is
including the principle of
.
K: Was the problem you have in addition with this, which we haven't raised
this China.
C: Yes, I know. That's another little problem.
K: We don't want to get ourselves into discriminatory box with China, but maybe
we can get Maxxsixbxxxx Mansfield to introduce a special legislation for them.
C: He is going to. So that would cover that. Is that language I read to you
sound reasonable?
K:
That sounds possible. Now let me ask you, when you say, does it
mean every two years the thing continues unless the Senate disapproves this.
C: That's right, yes.
K: It doesn't have a permanent
for it.
C: It should be renewable for additional periods in the language we've got in now.
Each not to exceed to 2 years subject to the provisions
K: So, there has to be a positive vote or it lapses.
C: The Congress would just have to reject itsix if it wanted. It would have the
opportunity to object every 2 years.
K: That I would prefer.
C: That's the way it is.
K: The other thing on credits. Are you requiring that every credit no
matter what the size be put before the
C: That would be a different matter that is not in this portion of the bill.
K: That is not in there.
Page data
- Page
- 40
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 11956435656f7804
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 498694036
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "498694036",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694036",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "April 22-24, 1974",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694036",
"collections": [
"National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
"Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 55,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "498694036",
"label": "April 22-24, 1974",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694036"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "498694036",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694036",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "April 22-24, 1974",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694036",
"collections": [
"National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
"Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 55,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694036",
"naId": 498694036,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 40,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-25-09-040.jpg",
"mediaId": "11956435656f7804",
"ocrText": "Cranston - page 3\nwhich one House of Congress could object to and thereafter the most\nfavored nation thing would be subject X approval or disapproval each two years\nso that Congress would have that right to take a look every two years and the\ngoverning what we should take into account woul include the following\nsection D and this is really the meat of the\nWhen considering such\na resolution of disapproval, the Congress shall take into account whether such\ncountry is evidencing resonable progress and or is not retregressing from the\nobservance of principles of human rights set forth in Section 402 which is\nincluding the principle of\n.\nK: Was the problem you have in addition with this, which we haven't raised\nthis China.\nC: Yes, I know. That's another little problem.\nK: We don't want to get ourselves into discriminatory box with China, but maybe\nwe can get Maxxsixbxxxx Mansfield to introduce a special legislation for them.\nC: He is going to. So that would cover that. Is that language I read to you\nsound reasonable?\nK:\nThat sounds possible. Now let me ask you, when you say, does it\nmean every two years the thing continues unless the Senate disapproves this.\nC: That's right, yes.\nK: It doesn't have a permanent\nfor it.\nC: It should be renewable for additional periods in the language we've got in now.\nEach not to exceed to 2 years subject to the provisions\nK: So, there has to be a positive vote or it lapses.\nC: The Congress would just have to reject itsix if it wanted. It would have the\nopportunity to object every 2 years.\nK: That I would prefer.\nC: That's the way it is.\nK: The other thing on credits. Are you requiring that every credit no\nmatter what the size be put before the\nC: That would be a different matter that is not in this portion of the bill.\nK: That is not in there."
}