Ask the Scholar

{
    "localId": "498694041",
    "label": "June 20-26, 1974",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694041"
}

{
    "id": "498694041",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694041",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "June 20-26, 1974",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694041",
    "collections": [
        "National Security Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "Henry A. Kissinger Telephone Conversation Transcripts (Telcons)"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-26-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-26-03-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-26-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-26-03-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-26-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-26-03-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 59,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/498694041",
    "naId": 498694041,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}

{
    "seq": 38,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-nsf/579113/Batch0002/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-26-03/37-natsec-kissinger_telcons-579113-26-03-038.jpg",
    "mediaId": "ea55177585adf5cd",
    "ocrText": "The President - page 2\nN: Which are not insignificant, let's face it.\nK: Well exactly, Mr. President, if we got a breakthrough on SALT which will\nget negotiated later on, that's not bad.\nN: That's right. But I mean having the threshhold of the ABM thing, is an\naccomplishment of itself.\nK: Of course. I don't find much nitpicking about the trip anymore.\nN: Scott said the committee was pretty well set, they didn't badger you with\nother streneous matters.\nK: No, I don't think this was the time to do it.\nN: Good. The Committee was, in XXIX other words, pretty supportive all\nthe way around, then.\nK: The Committee was very good. It was a very good session.\nN: That's good.\nK: And it was all on the summit, a little bit on NATO and Fulbright, when he\ncame out, made a very strong statement, the press tells me that others as they\nwere x coming out made good statements.\nN: Well, we have to understand this little flap on the nuclear thing -- they have\nto find something txxxx to pick on so they -- and people just -- it's such a\nthe trouble is such a darn XXXXXXXX mistery, you know, we have to remember\nEisenhower talked about atoms for peace; way back there we were going to share\nit with the world and gave the same speech, and Kennedy was for it. That's what\nthis is all about. How do you do it otherwise? Isn't that what it's about.\nK: Exactly. It's the only way you can control relations in this period.\nN: How about our Israeli friends. Are they still boxxxxx bombing?\nK: No, they stopped it. We made a sharp protest and they sent us a message\nthis afternoon -- this evening. In fact, Dinitz was just in here to tell me they\nhad stopped it.\nN: That's good. It should, in their own interest. We're not asking them to do\nsomething harmful for them. We're asking because if they go too far, we'll get\none hell of a reaction here. People now are on the mountain top; they want a\npeaceful settlement in the east.\nK: No question about it. I think they're coming on very strong.\nEND"
}