Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Source Description
This file contains:
Nixon's contributions to Republican representation in Congress. 11 pages. [Report], n.d.
Handwritten Republican workshop notes. 5 pages. [Other Document], n.d.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
26127312
label
WHSF: Returned, 46-21
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26127312
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Returned, 46-21
description
This file contains:
Nixon's contributions to Republican representation in Congress. 11 pages. [Report], n.d.
Handwritten Republican workshop notes. 5 pages. [Other Document], n.d.
citationUrl
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Returned White House Special Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26127312
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
541e1f99dbb24083
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library
White House Special Files Collection
Folder List
Box Number Folder Number Document Date
Document Type
Document Description
46
21
n.d.
Report
Nixon's contributions to Republican
representation in Congress. 11 pages.
46
21
n.d.
Other Document
Handwritten Republican workshop notes. 5
pages.
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Page 1 of 1
The implication promulgated by some political observers that
Nixon was a drag on party success in the 1960 campaign does not bear up
under examination of the election results. is study of House and Senate
election returns clearly shows that Nixon contributed heavily to the
increase in Republican representation in the Congress.
For example, in the Congressional races, where Republicans had
their most conspicuous success, Nixon ran ahead of the elected Republicans
in all but four of the 31 districts affected.
In the Senate races, Nixon ran ahead of the ticket in 19 of the
26 states where there was a genuine contest. He ran far ahead of such
conservatives as Curtis, Dworshak, Mundt, Schoeppel and Tower. In fact,
the only Republican now in the Senate to run ahead of Nixon in 1960 who
is generally designated as a conservative is Bridges. Nixon carried four-
teen states where there was a Senatorial contest, but in only ten of these
states was the Republican senatorial nominee successful. Moreover, Nixon
ran ahead of the ticket in the nine states where both Nixon and the
Republican candidate for Senator were defeated.
(Supporting data which follows is from The Congressional Quarterly)
1960 ELECTION RESULTS
A total of 280 Senate and House candidates ran five percentage points
or more ahead of their party's Presidential ticket in their State or District,
a Congressional Quarterly survey shows (#15, April 14, 1961, P. 636). Of the 280,
226 were Democrats (30 of them running without major party opposition) and 54
were Republicans (3 running without major party opposition). While 210 of the
elected Democrats ran 5 percentage points or more ahead of Kennedy, only 53 out
of the 188 elected Republicans similarly bested Nixon's record.
Ran Ahead
5% Ahead
10% Ahead
20% Ahead
DEMOCRATS
331
226
70
19
REPUBLICANS
133
54
22
1
Regional breakdown of those who ran 5 percentage points or more ahead:
East
Midwest
South
West
Total
DEMOCRATS
36
38
122
30
226
REPUBLICANS
24
14
3
13
54
SUMMARY
House Seate:
Republicans regained 26 seats which had been held by
Democrats, but in so doing they also lost 5 seats making a net
Republican gain of 21 seats. In 29 of the 31 states affected,
Nixon ran ahead of the ticket and it has been conceded by
impartial observers that he had considerable impact in getting
additional Republican representation in the House. He clearly
outdistanced Kennedy in this respect.
Senate Seats:
Republicans regained 2 Senate seats and held 11. In 19 of the 26 states,
where there was a genuine contest, Nixon ran ahead of the ticket. In
7 states where Republican Senatorial nominees were victorious Nixon ran
behind, though he gained the electoral votes in 4 of these states.
Except for 2 avowed conservatives (Bridges and Thompson) Nixon led the
ticket by percentage points ranging from 1.1% to 5.8%. There were only
3 states where Republican nominees were elected to the Senate but failed
to give Nixon their electoral college votes. However, Nixon carried
4 states where the Republican nominees lost. In 9 states where both
Nixon and the Republican nominees lost, Nixon ran ahead of the ticket by
percentage points ranging from .8% to 12.8%.
REPUBLICAN GAINS IN 1960 HOUSE ELECTIONS
CALIFORNIA - 25th District
Nixon
194,271
57.0%
Rousselot, John - R
182,545
53.6%
Kasem, George - D
158,289
46.4%
COLORADO - 2nd District
Nixon
158,081
59.2%
Dominick, Peter - R
150,964
57.6%
Johnson, Byron - D
111,077
42.4%
CONNECTICUT - 2nd District
Nixon
90,681
48.2%
Seely-Brown, Horace - R
93,971
50.1%
St. Onges, William - D
93,515
49.9%
4th District
Nixon
167,778
53.4%
Sibal, Abner - R
160,654
51.3%
Irwin, Donald - D
150,205
48.0%
INDIANA - 5th District
Nixon
122,780
57.1%
Chambers, George - R
106,882
50.0%
* Roush, J. Edward - D
108,870
50.0%
6th District
Nixon
95,811
58.5%
Roudebush, Richard - R
84,662
52.0%
Wampler, Fred - D
78,247
48.0%
9th District
Nixon
80,310
56.6%
Wilson, Earl - R
71,402
50.6%
Hogan, Earl - D
69,761
49.4%
10th District
Nixon
107,446
58.1%
Harvey, Ralph - R
104,885
57.1%
Harmon, Randall - D
78,716
42.9%
11th District
Nixon
166,202
57.7%
Bruce, Donald - R
154,676
53.7%
Barr, Joseph - D
133,153
46.2%
* Declared winner June, 1961
(Cont'd)
PAGE 2
IOWA - 2nd District
Nixon
113,006
53.4%
Bromwell, James - R
108,137
52.6%
Wolf, Leonard - D
97,608
47.4%
KANSAS - 2nd District
Nixon
115,640
57.8%
Ellsworth, Robert - R
95,346
52,3%
George, Newall - D
86,905
47.7%
3rd District
Nixon
59,639
59.9%
McVey, Walter - R
49,429
51.2%
Hargis, Denver - D
47,127
48.8%
MAINE - 1st District
Nixon
91,135
55.6%
Garland, Peter - R
85,821
53.8%
Oliver, James - D
73,826
46.2%
2nd District
Nixon
76,120
54.5%
Tupper, Stanley - R
71,271
53.2%
Donovan, John - D
62,309
46.5%
MARYLAND - 6th District
Nixon
119,461
52.6%
Mathias, Charles - R
115,088
52.0%
Foley, John - D
106,098
48.0%
MINNESOTA - 3rd District
Nixon
150,829
48.8%
Mac Gregor, Clark - R
154,847
51.6%
Wier, Roy - DFL
139,908
46.6%
MISSOURI - 7th District
Nixon
129,106
65.0%
Hall, Durward - R
107,208
54.9%
Brown, Charles - D
88,162
45.1%
MONTANA - 2nd District
Nixon
83,071
52.3%
Battin, James - R
78,277
50.9%
Graybill, Leo - D
75,507
49.1%
(Cont'd)
PAGE 3
NEBRASKA - 4th District
Nixon
92,989
65.4%
Martin, Dave - R
69,754
51.1%
McGinley, Donald - D
66,699
48.9%
NORTH DAKOTA - At Large
Nixon
154,310
55.4%
Nygaard, Hjalmar - R
127,118
53.8%
Anderson, Anson - D
109,207
46.2%
OHIO - 17th District
Nixon
102,529
63.9%
Ashbrook, John - R
79,609
53.0%
Levering, Robert - D
70,470
47.0%
OREGON - 4th District
Nixon
97,614
51.3%
Durno, Edwin - R
96,022
51.1%
Porter, Charles - D
91,947
48.9%
PENNSYLVANIA - 10th District
Nixon
81,193
45.8%
Scranton, William - R
97,012
54.8%
Prokop, Stanley - D
80,097
45.2%
19th District
Nixon
104,491
62.2%
Goodling, George - R
88,776
53.2%
Quigley, James - D
78,043
46.8%
SOUTH DAKOTA - 1st District
Nixon
135,381
57.9%
Reifel, Ben - R
126,033
54.8%
Fitzgerald, Ray - D
103,755
45.2%
VERMONT - At Large
Nixon
98,131
58.6%
Stafford, Robert - R
94,905
57.2%
Meyer, William - D
71,111
42.8%
WISCONSIN - 1st District
Nixon
103,540
55.0%
Schadeberg, Henry - R
97,662
52.7%
Flynn, Gerald - D
87,646
47.3%
SEATS HELD BY REPUBLICANS LOST IN 1960
IDAHO - 2nd District
Nixon
102,705
56.4%
Budge, Hamer - R
86,100
48.8%
Harding, Ralph - D
90,161
51.2%
NEW JERSEY - 8th District
Nixon
77,059
44.4%
Kennedy, Walter - R
74,165
43.8%
Joelson, Charles - D
88,100
52.0%
NEW YORK - 1st District
Nixon
216,655
57.0%
Wainwright, Stuyvesant 184,549
49.6%
- R
Pike, Otis - D
197,667
50.4%
NEW YORK - 5th District
Nixon
80,598
51.1%
Archinal, George - R
68,631
46.5%
Addabbo, Joseph - D
79,088
53.5%
NEW YORK - 12th District
Nixon
61,680
46.3%
Dorn, Francis - R
64,899
49.6%
Carey, Hugh - D
65,996
50.4%
STATES CARRIED BY NIXON WHERE A REPUBLICAN WAS ELECTED SENATOR
REPUBLICAN
NIXON
STATE
NOMINEE
% POINTS
Colorado
Allott *
+ 1.1
Idaho
Dworshak
*
+ 1.5
Iowa
Miller
+4.8
Kansas
Schoeppel *
: 5.8
Nebraska
Curtis *
+ 3.2
South Dakota
Mundt *
+ 5.8
Kentucky
Cooper *
- 1.7
Maine
Smith *
- 4.6
New Hampshire
Bridges *
- 6.9
Wyoming
Thompson
- 1.4
STATES LOST BY NIXON WHERE A REPUBLICAN WAS ELECTED SENATOR
Delaware
Boggs
- 1.7
Massachusetts
Saltonstall *
-16.6
New Jersey
Case *
- 4.5
STATES CARRIED BY NIXON WHERE A DEMOCRAT WAS ELECTED SENATOR
Alaska
McKinley
+14.3
Montana
Fjare
+ 1.8
Oklahoma
Crawford
+ 4.4
Oregon
Smith
+ 7.2
STATES NOT CARRIED BY NIXON AND WHERE A DEMOCRAT WAS ELECTED SENATOR
Illinois
Witwer
+ 4.6
Michigan
Bentley
+ .8
Minnesota
Peterson
+ 7.0
Missouri
Hocker
2.9
New Mexico
Colwes
+12.8
North Carolina
Hayes
+9.3
Rhode Island
Archambault
-15.7
Texas
Tower
+7.4
West Virginia
Underwood
2.6
*
Incumbent
COMPARISON OF REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL NOMINEES
with
RICHARD NIXON's VOTES
1960 ELECTIONS
ALASKA
Nixon
30,953
50.9%
McKinley
21,937
36.6%
COLORADO
Nixon
402,242
54.6%
* Allott
389,428
53.5%
DELAWARE
Nixon
96,373
49.0%
Boggs
98,874
50.7%
IDAHO
Nixon
161,597
53.8%
* Dworshak
152,648
52.3%
ILLINOIS
Nixon
2,368,988
49.8%
Witwer
2,093,846
45.2%
IOWA
Nixon
722,381
56.7%
Miller
642,463
51.9%
KANSAS
Nixon
561,474
60.4%
* Schoeppel
485,499
54.6%
KENTUCKY
Nixon
602,607
53.6%
* Cooper
644,087
59.2%
MAINE
Nixon
240,608
57.0%
* Smith
256,890
61.6%
MASSACHUSETTS
Nixon
976,750
39.6%
* Saltonstall
1,358,556
56.2%
* Incumbent
(cont'd)
PAGE 2
MICHIGAN
Nixon
1,620,428
48.8%
Bentley
1,548,873
48.0%
MINNESOTA
Nixon
757,915
49.2%
Peterson
648,586
42.2%
MISSOURI
Nixon
962,221
49.7%
Hocker
880,576
46.8%
MONTANA
Nixon
141,841
51.1%
Fjare
136,281
49.3%
NEBRASKA
Nixon
380,553
62.1%
* Curtis
352,748
58.9%
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Nixon
157,989
53.4%
* Bridges
173,521
60.3%
NEW JERSEY
Nixon
1,363,324
49.2%
* Case
1,483,832
55.7%
NEW MEXICO
Nixon
153,733
49.4%
Colwes
109,897
36.6%
NORTH CAROLINA
Nixon
655,420
47.9%
Hayes
497,964
30.6%
OKLAHOMA
Nixon
533,039
59.0%
Crawford
385,646
44.6%
OREGON
Nixon
408,060
52.6%
Smith (Elmo)
343,009
45.4%
* Incumbent
(cont'd)
RHODE ISLAND
Nixon
147,502
36.4%
Archambault
124,408
30.7%
SOUTH DAKOTA
Nixon
178,417
58.2%
* Mundt
160,181
52.4%
TEXAS
Nixon
1,121,699
48.5%
Tower
926,653
41.1%
WEST VIRGINIA
Nixon
395,995
47.3%
Underwood
369,935
44.7%
WYOMING
Nixon
77,451
55.0%
Thompson
78,103
56.4%
* - Incumbent
Repub Workshop
idmit bias my Reput interest tred completely to RN
at young age have met of worked - with many top men of time
both lew. & pol. Corp. presis, Goos, Sens, Cab on
Pres Eirahower, Kennedy, Hoover
Univ Pres. prout Heabing
Brown
Rocky Hatfield Daken Morton Lools
RN way above all in ability, intellect, etc Hanley Stratton
leas.
Roges
First dispose of cam paign criticisms - my feelings on them
no point in discussing - but might be of interest to state
/ debates - chmn committed before conventions to long. Commes
- between conv. final decision time - Rep. 10 pt. behind
- legit crit. is of format - holding debates was unavoidall
shldn't have let neto pressive into snappy out.
instead of debate in depth.
were deliberately designed to enter tain, not inform
-50state big city forces wld not have been chgd by physical pre
- breadth of campaign resulted in canying more
statest more long. dists than K
- needed to force him into south-made Rep townly
3- religion - our Cath frds wanted us to use Bailey Memo & fact of
JFK's minister film to show Caths being used
but RN refused to discuss - matter of principle
1 even if he had wouldn't have chgel vote
hit harder - was 1st probly only 50 state camp. - physical
every day hit on basic sive - pro init us ofed control
-press didn't accurately reflect depth of speeches
Covered form but not enuf content
- how many know of or read 12 posit papers
too deep to cover in speech
- had to get out faithful X sway undecided
5- the sooner - geared to last 3weeks - Ike would have but
didn't feel Kserian threat - thus nore effective
than it Canned speech
all probs trace back to need for strong party development
esp. big cities
bring in all elements - young, Negro, labor, etc
get away from social club work for cause
no honest election if one party control in cities
machines coop with Denis - mechan Connel
clean up voting by sublicity presence
RN plans to devote his time to public party affairs
Concerned about Row feelle org. is esp. big cities
look at situation- in 60 us 52 = outreg 3-2, 2-1 margin
had y/5 as many Good as 52 30 No 14
in cong.
153 long vs control in 52
592 san 200 857
1/4 as many state loges (26 7)
1942 reps us 2809
must win local state -
exp Good of NJ, mich, Pa. etc
party org more interested in cour thouse than statehous
we had to get 8-10 million Demos +55-60% of Inds
effect of press
need big crowds. etc not for Cand but for recection psych.
need to force coverage
start now to develop relation - X inform
must have sound planning for events
use our critical facilities
in each discussion meeting praise or damn current acts
publicije your action - make news every meeting
this influences gradually milds public openion
member of minority party must express in terms of others interests
take local actions don't wait for direction from Warl
too many different elements no real power
letter writing is effective
Get rid of non-partisan an solitics make it be partisan
Belair Repub women
my job in campaign
Beta alumni
pre him - set up offices, club org.
recruited and hand 18 adv men + 15 rally men
campaign - tour mgr of chaef of advance men
travelled w/ RN to all 50 - 64At + 75AA =140
incl previous (56+58) over 200 st miles w/tfor RN
adv. man's job - outline procedure & details
fire engine in road in Roghfad Beloit
Buffalo BBQ story
Crowds for train non stops
run Then typical schedule
" " AM check list
will attempt to be objective - but admit bias to RN
- also speak only for myself implications of anyone elses view
discuss campaign criticisms - don't mistake candor for apology
/- Debates -
- nail chmn committed to long. comms before conventions
Tunets wanted to obscure payola t rigging scandals
- poll in convention interlude showed K-J min. 10pts ahead
of any Rep. combination - we weren't ahead
fair criticism is of format decision to hold them
shedn't have let nets pressure into snappy entertainment
instead of discussion in depth classical debate
- had to get 8-10mill Dems plus 55-60% of Inds. -almost did.
were deliberately designed to extertain, not inform
2- 50 State
- big city forces wld not have been that changed lyphysical pres.
Dem. machines, labor vote, minorities,
plus weak Repub org.
- estab, Repub astruly national party great strides in South
wld not have camed more states t long dists than K.
3. religion
- our Cath. friends wanted usto use Bailey memo -Caths being "used"
RN refused to descuss principle - religion no bearing on capability
4- Ike sconer -
- -geared to last 3 weeks - more effective to build up
Hewould have - but didutfical K. serious Theat tel end
hence was more eff. fighter than with canned speech
5- hit harder
- fat allegation no pres. cand ever enunciated Reput.
- at least one speech each day basic cleavage of philosophy
philosophy more clearly than RN
individual american private sector rs, rely on Fed. Good.
- -major position papers science, education form tax, Communion &
press gave form, notenufcoxtent- - nodepth
perhaps events - more probly heavy factor than philorophy per
This was first & only 50 state campaign Lubell
Peale - RN illness- Lodge - alger = nocontrol, hurt badly
look at stration in 60 -vo 52 -outreg 3-2, 2-1margin in
Sen, HR+ Gous.
14 gous is 30, 72 house control states us 26
153 long. us control of House
lessons- -
/- overhaul primary system - toomany disparites - cands, wealth
2- shorten campaign
3 - media need to examine then repponsibilities
report in depth, unbrased, Candslide prediction 3wks early
experts on Nin East befor polls clored 1000- Ifa 15
4- im portance of individual vote + prob of being cast counted
Willard Edwards - Ted White Spellman
need to maternize ballot box machinery
revise eligibility laws - count absentees same day
discripances in makeup of ballot Texas
fraud fake
(in of machine counts areas RN 40,000 ahead of(k)
Chicago 2ndw - 22 voters, 82 apps., 77 votes Cast
andlia Cty P27 Tex- 86 voters, 17/cast- 147K, 24N
Fannin Cty Tex - K 3-1 - 6138 cast, 4895 elegible voter
5. electoral college reform - prop. to long. dest. -RNwld have won
only way to prevent is before election day - organization
results
2/10 of / % in 69 million votes - -X 000 in States 2 wldchg.
each person can have a pet theory why we lost
relate to ad. campaign eval,
if Raybarn right worst depression since 32 RN remarkalt
Canied 228 long Dist us 206 fack
gaind 2 gove 7 more house states 21 Cong.
RN 200Al letter more Than Kacc. to Sen PO
basic problem is Repub party organization
big city machines -no honest election if party control
must bring in all elements young, Negro, labor, etc
mustnow criticize Dens - dont concede
abundoned platform
Bobby not legally competent
missile gap
mc Namaras back pay
call for increased discipline us massive Fed handouts
11 employer steps to cucb dollar flow us
demand for min, wageraine
in all your meetings - pass resolutions of damn or praise
publicize them
we must win in local & state - Govs, etc
RNworking on party org. Calif notl. you can too.