Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Source Description
This file contains:
From Buchanan to Henry Buchanan RE: tension between the Re-Elect Nixon Committee and the Republican National Committee. 1pg [Subject: Campaign] [Letter], 10/25/1971
From Buchanan to RN RE: President's name on the ballot before the New Hampshire filing deadline. 1pg [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/22/1971
From to Buchanan to Timmons RE: letter from Mrs. Smith to Young GOP types in Maine. 1pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/18/1971
From Buchanan to Kehrli RE: Kehrli's memo on the "Bookstores." 1pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/15/1971
From Buchanan to RN RE: primary filing deadlines. 4pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/18/1971
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
26144210
label
WHSF: Contested, 1-9
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26144210
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Contested, 1-9
description
This file contains:
From Buchanan to Henry Buchanan RE: tension between the Re-Elect Nixon Committee and the Republican National Committee. 1pg [Subject: Campaign] [Letter], 10/25/1971
From Buchanan to RN RE: President's name on the ballot before the New Hampshire filing deadline. 1pg [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/22/1971
From to Buchanan to Timmons RE: letter from Mrs. Smith to Young GOP types in Maine. 1pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/18/1971
From Buchanan to Kehrli RE: Kehrli's memo on the "Bookstores." 1pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/15/1971
From Buchanan to RN RE: primary filing deadlines. 4pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 10/18/1971
citationUrl
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Contested Materials Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26144210
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
2cd100977f556462
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library
Contested Materials Collection
Folder List
Box Number
Folder Number
Document Date
No Date
Subject
Document Type
Document Description
1
9
10/25/1971
Campaign
Letter
From Buchanan to Henry Buchanan RE:
tension between the Re-Elect Nixon
Committee and the Republican National
Committee. 1pg
1
9
10/22/1971
Campaign
Memo
From Buchanan to RN RE: President's name
on the ballot before the New Hampshire
filing deadline. 1pg
1
9
10/18/1971
Campaign
Memo
From to Buchanan to Timmons RE: letter
from Mrs. Smith to Young GOP types in
Maine. 1pg.
1
9
10/15/1971
Campaign
Memo
From Buchanan to Kehrli RE: Kehrli's
memo on the "Bookstores." 1pg.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Page 1 of 2
Box Number
Folder Number
Document Date
No Date
Subject
Document Type
Document Description
1
9
10/18/1971
Campaign
Memo
From Buchanan to RN RE: primary filing
deadlines. 4pgs.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Page 2 of 2
[Item N-3]
October 25, 1971
Dear Hank:
Attached is an insider's report on a
small war that seems to be taking place
between the Re-Elect Nixon Committee
and the Republican National Committee.
One of the points of bitterness and
contention is the auditor's handling of
the accounts in the multi-million dollar
1968 campaign. The thing -- if this
Kevin Phillips survey be true -- is
headed for a little blood-letting. As
my old friend, Bryce Harlow, would put
it, "Be sure to bring your caseiron
jockey strap."
Regards,
Sincerely,
Pat
Mr. Henry Buchanan
Suite 311
7979 Old Georgetown Road
Bethesda, Maryland
[Item N-7]
October 22, 1971
MEMORANDUM TO THE PRESIDENT (Per HRH)
FROM: PATRICK J. BUCHANAN
Agree with this memo strongly. Whether or not he announced early
next year, before New Hampshire's filing deadline, the President's
name ought to be on that ballot. We should do what is required.
even if it means the President's own statement allowing his name
on the ballot to get him on.
No one is stronger than the President in N.H.; the primary may
come at a time of massive public exposure for him; a write-in for
RN will guarantee a smaller vote than otherwise; and a stand-in will
guarantee McCloskey a far larger vote than he would get against the
President. The time and place for finish McCloskey off for good is
right there. If McCloskey goes in there, incidentally, he will be filed
in most other "mandatory" states, as will the President, and that does
not seem bad, but good for us. We can use it to hone organization,
to run up the kind of massive primary victories that show RN the near
unanimous popular choice of his party; we will undercut the inevitable
"coronation" argument which would otherwise be used against us.
The President can say simply. "As I said in 1968, the nominee should
be tested in his party's primaries; that applies to Presidents as well
as any political figure. While I have not made up my mind and will
not make it up until later this year (1972), I am allowing my name to
be run in every contested primary.
Further, this can be used later against any Democrat, i.e., a Kennedy
who "hangs back" from the primary horror show shaping up on the
other side -- as we used it against HHH in 1968.
Buchanan
[Item N-10]
08
October 18, 1971
MEMORANDUM TO: BILL TIMMONS (FYI)
FROM:
PAT BUCHANAN
Attached is a letter from Mrs. Smith to some Young GOP
types in Maine indicating
a) She is using some juvenile staff members to explain her
case to the young,
b) She is hurting intellectually - given the tone of the missive,
c) She is selling her anti-Supreme Court, and anti-ABM votes
to the young openly.
Am getting readings from Maine that our best chance up there
may involve doing a deal to get Mrs. Smith not to run again.
Buchanan
[Item N-11]
October 15, 1971
MEMORANDUM TO:
Bruce Kehrli
FROM:
Pat Buchanan
SUBJECT:
Your Memo on the "Bookstores"
Assume this is to be used as a way to get Edith Efron's book
on the best seller list. This is the long way around Robin
Hood's Barn. If we have to buy thousands of books himply to
get tenth on a list then I think the money can better be spent
elsewhere. In a meeting with Neal Freeman, and Chuck Colson,
we covered this ground -- suggested and agreed on a course
of action to get publicity for Edith and her book. She is,
incidentally, getting excellent press coverage already -- in
syndicated columns and front page stories in some papers
(Boston, St. Louis). Freeman has her a good speaking schedule
on the tube. She will appear now before Sam Ervinjs committee
in January, which will be good timing.
As for the bookstores -- Neal Freeman says there are three
bookstores in New York, which one should buy at prodigiously,
which are always called by "listers" which we should focus on --
if we want to go that route, which he does not recommend. My
view is that -- even if our idea is to get the maximum publicity
and purchases for Vic Lasky's book, there are other and better
ways to do it.
Buchanan
October 18, 1971
MEMORANDUM TO THE PRESIDENT
FROM:
PATRICK J. BUCHANAN
Kevin Phillips has called to my attention a most interesting fact which
should cloud, to some degree, the Democratic primaries, and which seems
on the surface to strengthen the hand of Senator Muskie. The fact:
The filing deadline for no fewer than 13 primaries falls on or before the
date when the Florida primary takes place. In no fewer than six of these
13 primaries -- Presidential candidates are (Wisconsin, North Carolina,
Tennessee, Nebraska, Oregon, as well as Florida) or can be (Pennsylvania)
filed withou permission of the candidate himself.
In all these six primaries, the names filed in the Presidential primary
are those of "generally advocated and national recognized" Presidential
candidates. What does this mean:
a)
Anyone active in the Florida primary for the Presidential nomination
(as of now probably Chisholm, Jackson, Muskie, Lindsay, McGovern,
Wallace and Harris) is almost certainly going to be filed in all those other
six or seven primaries as well -- since Florida comes after the filing
deadlines ofaall of them, and since they will be "active" candidates when
that deadline passes.
b)
Lindsay and Chisholm and McGovern and the left candidates do not
have any "choice" as to whether they go into Tennessee, North Carolina
and Nebraska. If they go into Florida -- then they will automatically be
"filed" in the others; and Lindsay and Chisholm and McGovern will surely
wind up with a string of ignominious defeats before they get to Oregon.
c)
The likelihood is high then, that the primaries are going to be
something of a mess, and that secondary candidates -- even when
eliminated -- cannot help but have their names dragged through until at
least after Oregon.
DETERMINED TO BE All
ADMINISTRATIVE MARKING
By Bapaham HARS, Date 10/22/82
E.O. 12065, Section 6-102
-2-
d)
Unless Pete McCloskey withdraws immediately after New Hampshire --
he will automatically be filed in Tennessee (March 9 filing deadline),
Nebraska (March 10) and Oregon (March 14) -- where it is certain he will
be administered a massive defeat. Even if McCloskey does well in New
Hampshire (say 15%-30%). it would seem that he himself could see this
as his apogee, and then "stand down" immediately saying he had made
his point instead of taking his inevitable bad beatings in the Tennessee
and Nebraska primaries, even before Oregon.
e)
In both Oregon and Nebraska, just who is on the ballot is the sole
decision of the Secretary of State. In both cases, he is a Republican
(Clay Myers of Oregon, up in 1972) and Alan J. Beermann in Nebraska).
We should decide ourselved just who we want filed in the Democratic
paimaries do we want "George" or not in the Democratic primaries --
and then get the word to these Secretaries of State.
f)
Without having done mush analysis, I would thank at this point that
Muskie whose strength is much broader, whose recognition is wider, would
be the beneficiary of these cluttered primaries, or perhaps Jackson -- if
Wallace is kept out.
But if Muskie, as the centrist, between the extremes, as the front-runner
and best-known wins in all these contests, he is going to build considerable
momentum for a victory in California, which would cinch his nomination,
as of now, it seems to me.
g)
If the left takes a string of beatings as it seems Harris, McGovern,
Lindsay and Chisholm will certainly do in the "mandatory primaries" of
Florida, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Tennessee and Nebraska before
Oregon even comes up on May 23 it would seem thatby the time of
Oregon they would be forced to unite behind one of their number in Oregon --
or get whipped again. The "drubbing" of the left, which would seem
inherent in the shaping up of these primaries, might well produce the
kind of bitterness that would result in a fourth party.
(Note: If Lindsay is doing the same analysis as here, it would seem almost
certain that he would want to hang back until after the Florida deadline,
February 10, to announce. Also, Hubert would seem to have a vested
interest in staying out of these "mandatory" primaries, where he, too,
would see likely to get beat. But if Hubert wants to go into Wisconsin
(filing deadline January 31), he has to go into all of the six'mandatory"
primaries, since all their deadlines come after Florida.
-3-
h)
The California deadline is April 7. By the only New Hampshire
Florida, Illinois and Wisconsin will have taken place -- Wisconsin just
three days before!
At this point, the Left -- in the persons of Harris, Chisholm, McGovern
and Lindsay -- will have to decide whether they will go into the California
primary. As will Edward M. Kennedy. If both Kennedy and Lindsay go,
of course, that makes for a split in the Left vote, and perhaps or probably
a victory for Muskie.
The above is a very sketchy analysis based on the deadlines for filing and
the dates of the primaries themselves. At this point in time, it seems to
me we should have an experienced, professional analyst looking over
these maze of dates and regulations in the primaries, to give us some
kind of accurate scenario over what each candidate is likely to do -- in
light of them.
Buchanan
cc: Attorney General Mitchell
H. R. Haldeman
ere
Primary
Filing
State
Date
State
Deadline
New Hampshire
March 7
Illinois
January 3
Florida
March 14
Wisconsin
January 31
Illinois
March 21
Rhode Island
January 31
Wisconsin
Aptil 4
Ohio
February 2
Rhode Island
April 11
New Hampshire
February 3
Massachusetts
April 25
West Virginia
February 5
Pennsylvania
April 25
Florida
February 10
District of Columbia
May 2
Pehnsylvania
February 15
Indiana
May 2
Massachusetts
February 29
Ohio
May 2
North Carolina
March 7
North Carolina
May 2
Tennessee
March 9
Tennessee
May 4
Nebraska
March 10
Nebraska
May 9
Oregon
March 14
West Virginia
May 9
District of Columbia
March 18
Maryland
May 16
Indiana
March 23
Oregon
May 23
Maryland
March 24
California
June 6
California
April 7
New Mexico
June 6
New Mexico
April 7
South Dakota
June 6
South Dakota
April 22
New Jersey
June 6
New Jersey
April 29
!