Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Source Description

This file contains: From Colson to Dent lamenting Weicker's vote, recommending Sibal for GOP Senate nomination in Connecticut. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 2/12/1970 From Dent to Harlow, Timmons, Chotiner, Colson, Allison re: Weicker voting against RN, losing support of financial backers to Lupton in Connecticut Senate race. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 1/30/1970

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
26144641
label
WHSF: Contested, 4-3
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26144641
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Contested, 4-3
description
This file contains: From Colson to Dent lamenting Weicker's vote, recommending Sibal for GOP Senate nomination in Connecticut. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 2/12/1970 From Dent to Harlow, Timmons, Chotiner, Colson, Allison re: Weicker voting against RN, losing support of financial backers to Lupton in Connecticut Senate race. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 1/30/1970
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Contested Materials Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26144641
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
c3c194eae848f3cb
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 4 3 2/12/1970 Campaign Memo Memo from Colson to Dent lamenting Weicker's vote, recommending Sibal for GOP Senate nomination in Connecticut. 1 pg. 4 3 1/30/1970 Campaign Memo Memo from Dent to Harlow, Timmons, Chotiner, Colson, Allison re: Weicker voting against RN, losing support of financial backers to Lupton in Connecticut Senate race. 1 pg. Wednesday, August 18, 2010 Page 1 of 1 February 12, 1970 FOR: HARRY DENT FROM: CHUCK COLSON This is in response to your memo of January 30th. I agree completely that Lupton cannot make it in Connecticut and in view of Weicker's vote, I am not sure that we want him. I hope you have looked into Ab Sibal as a. candidate. I am a little prejudiced because Ab is a former law partner of mine. He is an outstanding politician and was one of the first Connecticut Republicans to announce for Nixon early in 1968. He would be a loyalist in the Senate and it is my understanding that he is running in the same poll you referred to ahead of all other Republican candidates. I don't know what Ether- ington's announcement does to this but I am personally convinced that Sibal could win and would be an Administration supporter in the Senate. As for Weicker's reaction to the pressure, I generated it. His father is Chairman of the Board of Bigelow-Sanford, which is the biggest single beneficiary of our recent Wilton and velvet carpet decision. Frankly, it doesn't bother me a bit if he is upset. What bothers me is that he didn't have tense enough to vote with us. DETERMINED TO BE AN ADMINISTRATIVE MARKING January 30, 1970 By ints NARS, Date 7/14/80 E.O. 12065, Section 6-102 COMP IDENTIAL TO: BRYCE HARLOW BILL TIMMONS MURRAY CHOTINER CHUCK COLSON» JIM ALLISON FROM: HARRY DENT ASP Lowell Weicker, Jr., has been hurt with the big financial backers in Connecticut because of his failure to support the President on the veto. Al Cole of Readers Digest, Jerry Milbank, Gerrish Milliken, Gordon Reed, etc., are now going to back Lupton for the Senate. They say Weicker also voted against the President on ABM. A recent Opinion Research telephone poll in Connecticut showed Weicker to be running ahead of Dodd, and the same is true of Lupton. Lupton is considered to be rather conservative and it is Weicker's position that Lupton cannot make it in a state like Connecticut. Weicker was particularly disturbed that his father, the owner of a carpet mill, had been called and asked to put pressure on Weicker about his vote. He said this locked him in to vote against the President. I really think he was just disturbed that he realized he had lost his big financial supporters over this vote. They all called him and got after him prior to the vote. CONF IDENTIAL CONF IDENTIAL