Ask the Scholar
Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Richard Nixon Presidential Library
Contested Materials Collection
Folder List
Box Number
Folder Number
Document Date
No Date
Subject
Document Type
Document Description
6
15
6/28/1972
Campaign
Memo
Note recommending that John Ehrlichman be
given the campaign director's job. Author
and recipient unknown, although Haldeman
may have composed the note. 2 pgs.
Friday, March 26, 2010
Page 1 of 1
6/28/72
probably be academic, but below our my thoughts
By t the time you read thei the whole thing will
on Why Ehrlechmen should be selected over
Mac Dregn to handle the compaign director's job.
I went through a list of both menic positiverant
even. The key factor focus on in this
regative and basically they come out fairly
the election. Because of this limitation and the
situation in time There are only 132 days until
following factor the Delate to at Ehelichnan
Uget the wod.
- Ehrlishman known the situation. Action u
minimal. Also John known the players at 1701
needed now. With John start up tome would be
all too well. Mae tregor would take much longer
would minimal because Ashn known
and equally important they know him. The jockying
to get acclimated.
His job on the D.C. is done. clu some
- Moring Ehrlichman clornit leave whole here.
Can he's actually an obstructionst. Cole
can handle what fi beft on a dayto day bain
Moe Dregor onthe other hand has reveral things before
Congrees and will for the rest few month - is SALT
etc. Plue Compress would view Mac removal on downgrowding them.
-Ehrlichmen in acquainted with a large
section of National leader ui cluding Hovemen,
Mayon, etc. Clash u entirely Congresient
Earlichway promine ù well known The
Move would demonitrate new privities have been planed
onthe compaign bothe White Home. cit would
frie up the troope
Ehrlichmon in a better spokermen than Mac Mregor.
Finally the argument that John must travel in the
campaign in at valid. While it in undownitedly
decircable other arrangements can be made.
Document source description
This file contains:
Note recommending that John Ehrlichman be given the campaign director's job. Author and recipient unknown, although Haldeman may have composed the note. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/28/1972
Page data
- Page
- 1
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- 9ee774b65c2ed824
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 26144889
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "26144889",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "WHSF: Contested, 6-15",
"description": "This file contains:\n\nNote recommending that John Ehrlichman be given the campaign director's job. Author and recipient unknown, although Haldeman may have composed the note. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/28/1972",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889",
"collections": [
"Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection",
"Contested Materials Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "26144889",
"label": "WHSF: Contested, 6-15",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "26144889",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "WHSF: Contested, 6-15",
"description": "This file contains:\n\nNote recommending that John Ehrlichman be given the campaign director's job. Author and recipient unknown, although Haldeman may have composed the note. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/28/1972",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889",
"collections": [
"Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection",
"Contested Materials Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889",
"naId": 26144889,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 1,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
"mediaId": "9ee774b65c2ed824",
"ocrText": "Richard Nixon Presidential Library\nContested Materials Collection\nFolder List\nBox Number\nFolder Number\nDocument Date\nNo Date\nSubject\nDocument Type\nDocument Description\n6\n15\n6/28/1972\nCampaign\nMemo\nNote recommending that John Ehrlichman be\ngiven the campaign director's job. Author\nand recipient unknown, although Haldeman\nmay have composed the note. 2 pgs.\nFriday, March 26, 2010\nPage 1 of 1\n6/28/72\nprobably be academic, but below our my thoughts\nBy t the time you read thei the whole thing will\non Why Ehrlechmen should be selected over\nMac Dregn to handle the compaign director's job.\nI went through a list of both menic positiverant\neven. The key factor focus on in this\nregative and basically they come out fairly\nthe election. Because of this limitation and the\nsituation in time There are only 132 days until\nfollowing factor the Delate to at Ehelichnan\nUget the wod.\n- Ehrlishman known the situation. Action u\nminimal. Also John known the players at 1701\nneeded now. With John start up tome would be\nall too well. Mae tregor would take much longer\nwould minimal because Ashn known\nand equally important they know him. The jockying\nto get acclimated.\nHis job on the D.C. is done. clu some\n- Moring Ehrlichman clornit leave whole here.\nCan he's actually an obstructionst. Cole\ncan handle what fi beft on a dayto day bain\nMoe Dregor onthe other hand has reveral things before\nCongrees and will for the rest few month - is SALT\netc. Plue Compress would view Mac removal on downgrowding them.\n-Ehrlichmen in acquainted with a large\nsection of National leader ui cluding Hovemen,\nMayon, etc. Clash u entirely Congresient\nEarlichway promine ù well known The\nMove would demonitrate new privities have been planed\nonthe compaign bothe White Home. cit would\nfrie up the troope\nEhrlichmon in a better spokermen than Mac Mregor.\nFinally the argument that John must travel in the\ncampaign in at valid. While it in undownitedly\ndecircable other arrangements can be made."
}