Ask the Scholar

Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 1

OCR

Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 6 15 6/28/1972 Campaign Memo Note recommending that John Ehrlichman be given the campaign director's job. Author and recipient unknown, although Haldeman may have composed the note. 2 pgs. Friday, March 26, 2010 Page 1 of 1 6/28/72 probably be academic, but below our my thoughts By t the time you read thei the whole thing will on Why Ehrlechmen should be selected over Mac Dregn to handle the compaign director's job. I went through a list of both menic positiverant even. The key factor focus on in this regative and basically they come out fairly the election. Because of this limitation and the situation in time There are only 132 days until following factor the Delate to at Ehelichnan Uget the wod. - Ehrlishman known the situation. Action u minimal. Also John known the players at 1701 needed now. With John start up tome would be all too well. Mae tregor would take much longer would minimal because Ashn known and equally important they know him. The jockying to get acclimated. His job on the D.C. is done. clu some - Moring Ehrlichman clornit leave whole here. Can he's actually an obstructionst. Cole can handle what fi beft on a dayto day bain Moe Dregor onthe other hand has reveral things before Congrees and will for the rest few month - is SALT etc. Plue Compress would view Mac removal on downgrowding them. -Ehrlichmen in acquainted with a large section of National leader ui cluding Hovemen, Mayon, etc. Clash u entirely Congresient Earlichway promine ù well known The Move would demonitrate new privities have been planed onthe compaign bothe White Home. cit would frie up the troope Ehrlichmon in a better spokermen than Mac Mregor. Finally the argument that John must travel in the campaign in at valid. While it in undownitedly decircable other arrangements can be made.

Document source description

This file contains: Note recommending that John Ehrlichman be given the campaign director's job. Author and recipient unknown, although Haldeman may have composed the note. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/28/1972

Page data

Page
1
Source index
0
Type
document
Media ID
9ee774b65c2ed824
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
26144889
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "26144889",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "WHSF: Contested, 6-15",
    "description": "This file contains:\n\nNote recommending that John Ehrlichman be given the campaign director's job. Author and recipient unknown, although Haldeman may have composed the note. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/28/1972",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889",
    "collections": [
        "Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection",
        "Contested Materials Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "26144889",
    "label": "WHSF: Contested, 6-15",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "26144889",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "WHSF: Contested, 6-15",
    "description": "This file contains:\n\nNote recommending that John Ehrlichman be given the campaign director's job. Author and recipient unknown, although Haldeman may have composed the note. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/28/1972",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889",
    "collections": [
        "Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection",
        "Contested Materials Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26144889",
    "naId": 26144889,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 1,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/89/1448/26144889/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-6/Contested-06-15.pdf",
    "mediaId": "9ee774b65c2ed824",
    "ocrText": "Richard Nixon Presidential Library\nContested Materials Collection\nFolder List\nBox Number\nFolder Number\nDocument Date\nNo Date\nSubject\nDocument Type\nDocument Description\n6\n15\n6/28/1972\nCampaign\nMemo\nNote recommending that John Ehrlichman be\ngiven the campaign director's job. Author\nand recipient unknown, although Haldeman\nmay have composed the note. 2 pgs.\nFriday, March 26, 2010\nPage 1 of 1\n6/28/72\nprobably be academic, but below our my thoughts\nBy t the time you read thei the whole thing will\non Why Ehrlechmen should be selected over\nMac Dregn to handle the compaign director's job.\nI went through a list of both menic positiverant\neven. The key factor focus on in this\nregative and basically they come out fairly\nthe election. Because of this limitation and the\nsituation in time There are only 132 days until\nfollowing factor the Delate to at Ehelichnan\nUget the wod.\n- Ehrlishman known the situation. Action u\nminimal. Also John known the players at 1701\nneeded now. With John start up tome would be\nall too well. Mae tregor would take much longer\nwould minimal because Ashn known\nand equally important they know him. The jockying\nto get acclimated.\nHis job on the D.C. is done. clu some\n- Moring Ehrlichman clornit leave whole here.\nCan he's actually an obstructionst. Cole\ncan handle what fi beft on a dayto day bain\nMoe Dregor onthe other hand has reveral things before\nCongrees and will for the rest few month - is SALT\netc. Plue Compress would view Mac removal on downgrowding them.\n-Ehrlichmen in acquainted with a large\nsection of National leader ui cluding Hovemen,\nMayon, etc. Clash u entirely Congresient\nEarlichway promine ù well known The\nMove would demonitrate new privities have been planed\nonthe compaign bothe White Home. cit would\nfrie up the troope\nEhrlichmon in a better spokermen than Mac Mregor.\nFinally the argument that John must travel in the\ncampaign in at valid. While it in undownitedly\ndecircable other arrangements can be made."
}