Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Source Description
This file contains:
From Magruder to Haldeman RE: using Klein more effectively across the nation. Handwritten notes added by unknown. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/4/1971
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
26145289
label
WHSF: Contested, 8-40
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26145289
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Contested, 8-40
description
This file contains:
From Magruder to Haldeman RE: using Klein more effectively across the nation. Handwritten notes added by unknown. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/4/1971
citationUrl
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Contested Materials Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26145289
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
e7719f5d38d32b38
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library
Contested Materials Collection
Folder List
Box Number
Folder Number
Document Date
No Date
Subject
Document Type
Document Description
8
40
6/4/1971
Campaign
Memo
From Magruder to Haldeman RE: using
Klein more effectively across the nation.
Handwritten notes added by unknown. 1 pg.
Friday, August 27, 2010
Page 1 of 1
CITIZENS FOR THE RE-ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT
WASHINGTON
Good idea
SUITE 272
me
1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE. N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
June 4, 1971
(202) 333-0920
DETERMINED TO BE AN
ADMINISTATIVE MARKING
By
CONFIDENTIAL
B.Jayne NARS, E.O. Section 6-102
Date
3-11
82
MEMORANDUM FOR:
MR. HALDEMAN
FROM:
JEB S. MAGRUDER
SUBJECT:
HERB KLEIN
As you know, Herb has been visiting many cities talking to ditorial
boards, holding press conferences, and going on local talk shows, and
much of his activity has been centered in the larger cities. I recently
heard from a number of sources that he is wearing out his welcome in the
major markets for two reasons: (1) he has been in some of the larger
cities a number of times. As an example, he has been in Los Angeles three
times in the last three months and, in talking with editorial boards,
unless you have something relatively new to discuss, continued visits can
be counter-productive for the President and; (2) most of the people he is
talking with have effective Washington Bureaus and the information Herb
is telling them is relatively well known to them.
I know a number of people have suggested Herb concentrate more in the
secondary markets where, I think, he would be most effective for the
President. My understanding is he has not accepted this.
I recommend that you refer to your earlier memorandum asking for a con-
tinual update on his travel to the secondary markets and encourage him
to visit cities like Dayton, Memphis, Tallahassee, etc., as against the
larger cities. Since most of the newspaper and television stations in
these markets do not have full time Washington Bureaus I think they will
be more receptive to his explanations of our programs and policies.
CONFIDENTIAL