Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Source Description

This file contains: From Gordon Strachan to H.R. Haldeman. RE: Political Matters. 3 pgs. [Subject: White House Staff] [Memo], 6/14/1972 From Richard L. Fore through Jeb S. Magruder to John N. Mitchell. RE: An Analysis of the McGovern Campaign Organization in the California Primary. 4 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/12/1972 Title" George C. Wallace (GCW) Status Report 6/9/72. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Report], 6/9/1973 From Harry Dent to John Mitchell (copy: H.R. Haldeman). This document discusses George C. Wallace and ballots. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/12/1972 Handwritten Note. This document discusses State Representatives, organizing, mailings, and polling. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Other Document], 6/13/1972 Handwritten Note. This document discusses poll meetings. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Other Document], 6/14/1972 From Bruce Kehrli to H.R. Haldeman (cc: Alexander P. Butterfield). RE: McGovern. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/12/1972

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
26145980
label
WHSF: Contested, 32-6
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26145980
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Contested, 32-6
description
This file contains: From Gordon Strachan to H.R. Haldeman. RE: Political Matters. 3 pgs. [Subject: White House Staff] [Memo], 6/14/1972 From Richard L. Fore through Jeb S. Magruder to John N. Mitchell. RE: An Analysis of the McGovern Campaign Organization in the California Primary. 4 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/12/1972 Title" George C. Wallace (GCW) Status Report 6/9/72. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Report], 6/9/1973 From Harry Dent to John Mitchell (copy: H.R. Haldeman). This document discusses George C. Wallace and ballots. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/12/1972 Handwritten Note. This document discusses State Representatives, organizing, mailings, and polling. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Other Document], 6/13/1972 Handwritten Note. This document discusses poll meetings. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Other Document], 6/14/1972 From Bruce Kehrli to H.R. Haldeman (cc: Alexander P. Butterfield). RE: McGovern. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/12/1972
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Contested Materials Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26145980
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
47697e169b12f2c8
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 32 6 6/14/1972 White House Staff Memo From Gordon Strachan to H.R. Haldeman. RE: Political Matters. 3 pgs. 32 6 6/12/1972 Campaign Memo From Richard L. Fore through Jeb S. Magruder to John N. Mitchell. RE: An Analysis of the McGovern Campaign Organization in the California Primary. 4 pgs. 32 6 6/9/1973 Campaign Report Title" George C. Wallace (GCW) Status Report 6/9/72. 1 pg. 32 6 6/12/1972 Campaign Memo From Harry Dent to John Mitchell (copy: H.R. Haldeman). This document discusses George C. Wallace and ballots. 1 pg. Tuesday, August 23, 2011 Page 1 of 2 Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 32 6 6/13/1972 Campaign Other Document Handwritten Note. This document discusses State Representatives, organizing, mailings, and polling. 2 pgs. 32 6 6/14/1972 Campaign Other Document Handwritten Note. This document discusses poll meetings. 1 pg. 32 6 6/12/1972 Campaign Memo From Bruce Kehrli to H.R. Haldeman (cc: Alexander P. Butterfield). RE: McGovern. 2 pgs. Tuesday, August 23, 2011 Page 2 of 2 Presidential Materials Review Board Review on Contested Documents Collection: H. R. Haldeman Box Number: 312 Folder: Campaign 21 June 7-14, 1972 Document Disposition 114 Return Private/Political MEMO, STRACHAN TO HRH, 6/14/72 115 Return Private/Political MEMO, FORE TO MITCHELL, 6/2/72 116 Return Private/Political GEORGE C WALLACE STATUS REPORT, 6/9/72 117 Return Private/Political GEORGE C. WALLXE STATUS REPORT, 6/9/72 118 Retain Open 119 Return Private/Political MEMO, DENT TO MITCHILL, 6/12/72 120 Return Private/Political NOTES, "NOF-WON'T WORRY ", 6/13/[72] 121 Return Private/Political NOTES, -H- TICKETS 6/14/[72] 122 Return Private/Political MEMO, KEHRLI TO HRH, 6/12/72 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTO.N ADMINISTRATIVELY CONFIDENTIAL June 14, 1972 MEMORANDUM FOR: H. R. HALDEMAN FROM: GORDON STRACHAN G SUBJECT: Political Matters Finances 1) Herb Kalmbach returned from Europe yesterday. At Stans' request he selected a European fundraising chairman, Pier Talenti, a close friend of John Mitchell's as well as the President. Talenti has'a 1,000 quota. Kalmbach met his 10,000 quota and is resisting Stans' efforts to have him accept another 3,000 quota. Kalmbach is meeting with Ehrlichman in California today and hopes to receive some "special, non-fundraising assignments". 2) Concerning the Stans-Nunn request to keypunch the White House Support List (the 300,000 who have written in supporting the President), you asked me to check Dean. He responded on June 12 with his approval to using these names for a direct mail fundraising effort by Stans. Recommendation That you authorize Lee Nunn to have the White House Support List keypunched for a mailing after the Democratic National Committee Convention subject to your approval of the text of the letter. Approval Disapproval Comments 3) Sloan has discussed the suggestion of having the publicly known contributors to the President appear on the next public record with Stans. He is receptive and will try to get a broad group with varying amounts to permit their names Lo appear publicly on August 4, 1972. - 2 - John Mitchell 1) He addressed the 60 top people at 1701 this morning for ten minutes. The tone was quite tough emphasizing that 1701 has been in the process of organizing and by and large done a pretty good job. But now its nuts and bolts; forget big meals, media and fun stuff. McGovern has an excellent voter identification and canvassing operation. The staff at 1701 that wants to work on registration and follow on should get to work; others should leave. The transition from planning to activation is complete. 2) Mitchell then introduced Rick Fore, who is a 26- year old from Virginia, who worked in Shafron's Virginia Lieutenant Governor campaign and was an assistant to Congressman William Cramer (R-Fla.) and Phillip Crane (R-Ill.); he now works directly for Bob Marik. Fore had completed an analysis of the McGovern campaign (attached at Tab A). A quick summary will indicate that McGovern will be a worthy opponent: 40,000 volunteers in the field; 140 store front headquarters, manned by volunteers seven days a week; three computer centers monitoring the canvassing; two million direct mail pieces; telephone banks to duplicate canvassing; personally contacting 4 million of the 5.1 million Democrats. 3) Al Kaupinen described the new registration drive system with Illinois as an example. Results will be available July 8. 4) An updated talking paper incorporating the changes you made on the June 12 talking paper is attached at Tab B. You may want to cover some of the points in this Mitchell talking paper with the Ehrlichman political group tomorrow at 10 a.m. Harry Dent 1) He had a long discussion with Bob Teeter about the advertising slogan testing Dailey and Teeter are conducting on "President Nixon - Now More Than Ever". Dent was concerned that the slogan was too sophisticated for the average man and you asked that it be tested. Results should be available from Teeter next week. 2) Mitchell has not given Dent an answer on whether John Rollins should conduct a special fundraising effort for Governors and Senators we are interested in supporting. - 3 - 3) Dent's main contact in the Wallace organization, Tom Turnipseed, is convinced that Wallace will not run on a third party ticket for physical as well as ballot reasons. (Wallace ballot status summary is attached at Tab C.) Dent is trying to obtain information on the McGovern-Wallace meeting. Lyn Nofziger Discussion with Nofziger on June 13 developed several points: 1) Although Governor Reagan is unhappy about Finch moving to California, Lyn claims he won't worry about it and will use him in the campaign; 2) The 29,000 volunteers developed by the direct mail effort will be used for precinct organization, while the regular party will conduct registration. (I got the impression that very little was in fact happening.) ; 3) He still has problems with 1701 because "it never went together very well", but believes Mardian is a very positive addition; 4) He complains that Bill Horton has not delivered on several requests and is now taking a five week vacation; 5) California Democrats and Independents will not come out and support the President. Committee for the Re-election of the President MEMORANDUM June 12, 1972 CONFIDENTIAL/EYES ONLY MEMORANDUM FOR: THE HONORABLE JOHN N. MITCHELL THROUGH: JEB S. MAGRUDER FROM: RICHARD L. FORE SUBJECT: An Analysis of the McGovern Campaign Organization in the California Primary Attached you will find a report on the McGovern Campaign Organization that is a result of my observations while in California. CONFIDENTIAL/EYES ONLY ANALYSIS OF THE McGOVERN CAMPAIGN ORGANIZATION IN THE CALIFORNIA PRIMARY GENERAL ORGANIZATION Many of McGovern's national campaign staff arrived in California as early as October, 1971 to raise money, recruit volunteers, and build an organization for the June, 1972 primary. By May of this year, Senator George McGovern already had between 20,000 and 40,000 Volunteers working in the precincts of California. The McGovern staff operated from three central headquarters in California: the Southern California Headquarters in Los Angeles, the Northern California Headquarters in San Francisco, and the State Headquarters in Los Angeles. In addition, the McGovern organization took their campaign to the people with 140 store front headquarters located over the entire state (Tab A). Most of the headquarters were located on an assembly district basis with full time volunteers manning the store front operations 7 days a week, 13 hours a day including holidays. In most areas the store front headquarters were staffed by semi- professional organizers (McGovern volunteers who had been through primaries in other states and who had a firm grasp of grassroot politics) and local California volunteers who will be the trained organizers for the general election in November. The store front headquarters' staff were articulate, bright, and extremely effective organizers who placed major emphasis on canvassing. VOTER IDENTIFICATION The McGovern staff began their voter identification program by securing lists of registered Democrats. These names were fed ínto a computer which generated a computer print out of the registered Democratic voters, with telephone numbers. The format of the computer print out was such that it could be used for door-to-door canvassing and telephoning. It was developed in precinct walking order with an area for marking a coded response: (1) strong McGovern, (2) leaning McGovern, (3) undecided, (4) anti or leaning against McGovern. Another area of the print out was reserved for issues and comments (Tab B). McGovern volunteers placed each computer print out into a McGovern '72 Precinct Campaign Kit which gave instructions for door-to-door canvassers. The general rules emphasized that all precincts should be walked, not telephoned. Specific instructions included a canvass conversation and coding procedure (Tab C). - 2 - Each McGovern '72 Precinct Campaign Kit was enclosed in an envelope with a map of the precinct attached to the outside (Tab D). The envelope also contained McGovern literature, bumper stickers, and an identification badge. The kits were distributed to the appropriate assembly district store front headquarters. For the most part, precinct captains were not designated for canvassing. Blitz teams and individual "walk-in" volunteers were assigned precincts. The McGovern Campaign found that while it was difficult to recruit a precinct captain who would take full responsibility for each precinct, it was much easier to find a volunteer who would give 4 to 6 hours to canvass a precinct (Tab E). The McGovern staff maintained strict accountability and control over all canvassers. Specific times were designated for returning the McGovern '72 Precinct Campaign Kit. Control Boards were used in store front headquarters so that the staff could determine the status of canvassing at any time. Volunteers also used telephone banks to canvass voters. Telephoning did not substitute for door-to-door voter identification. Its purpose was to supplement and often duplicate the door-to-door canvass. Although the telephone banks were not located in the store front head- quarters, close coordination existed with telephone banks reporting the results of their day's work to the staff of the store front operation. The state level staff also used a telephone bank in the Central Head- quarters to call local headquarters across the state and check on the status of canvassing. This served as both a check and prodding mechanism. In addition, state field staff made regular trips to local headquarters to assist in problem areas and provide an additional system of control and accountability. When the volunteers completed canvassing and returned the McGovern '72 Precinct Campaign Kit, the computer print outs that had been coded were sent to the computer center so that "personalized" computer letters could be mailed to those identified in the canvass as being favorable or undecided. After all information from the canvass had been fed into the computer, the print outs were returned to the local headquarters within five days for recanvassing purposes. During the last days of the campaign, headquarters' volunteers hand addressed mailings to those who were canvassed because there was not sufficient time for computerized letters. Most canvassing had been completed a week before election day. The last week of the campaign was used to recanvass "not at homes" and undecideds. - 3 - GET OUT THE VOTE (VOTER TURN CUT) Computer centers generated a second print out on the Sunday before election day (Tab F). These print outs of the 1, 2, and 3's - favorable, leaning favorable, and undecided, were enclosed in a Democratic Presidential Primary Election Canvass Kit. (Tab G). Volunteers used these kits to go door-to-door and to call voters reminding them to vote. Volunteers offered rides to the polls and baby sitters to those at home. Volunteers left door knob hangers indicating the appropriate polling place to those not at home (Tab H). ADDITIONAL CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES Although the McGovern staff and volunteers concentrated primarily on voter identification and voter turn out, the following activities were also well planned and coordinated. RALLIES: McGovern staff and volunteers used leaflets and sound trucks to promote McGovern speaking events, headquarters openings, etc. well in advance of the day of the event (Tab I). Because of the importance of their assigned task, McGovern volunteers engaged in canvassing were asked not to attend rallies. DISTRIBUTION OF MATERIALS: McGovern volunteers followed à well planned program for saturating the entire state with bumper stickers, posters, and brochures which were brief and to the point. (Tab J). VOLUNTEER RECRUITMENT: McGovern headquarters' staff was composed of volunteers of all ages who were cordial and extremely effective in recruiting other volunteers. Most prospective volunteers who entered a McGovern headquarters were recruited immediately and asked to do the most meaningful work - canvassing. CONCLUSION As indicated throughout this analysis, canvassing for voter identification and get-out-the-vote was the highest priority in the McGovern campaign in the California Primary. As a result, 20,000 to 40,000 volunteers effectively canvassed 4 million of the 5.1 million voters in 19,000 of the 23,000 precincts in a state that was thought to be too large to organize. Just as in other primary states, the McGovern campaign organization has left behind a residual force of trained volunteers in California for the general election. GEORGE C. WALLACE (GCW) Mo. Yes New party Potition: 7/31 STATUS REPORT: 6/9/72 (See text) CAN AS Mont. Yes AP Convention 9/23 GCW CANDIDATE ACTION STATE RUN OF REQUIRED DATE Ncb. No All applicable filing dates presed. Ala. Yes AIP Convention 9/9 Nev. Yes Now party Petition: 7/7 6,882 sigs. Alas. Yes AIP Request 8/10 Ariz. Petition:11 Yes New Party 7/14 N.H. Yes AP Certify 7/13 last vote Ark. Yes AIP Convention 9/4-9/24 N.J. Yes AP Already qualified Cal. Yes AIP Certifica- Open tion N.M. Yes AIP Certify & 9/12 Petition: Colo. Yes New party Petition: 9/24 3% last 300 sigs. vote Conn. Yes George Nom. papers 9/20 N.Y. Yes Indep. Petition: Wallace 8/28-31 Party 20,000 sigs. Del. Yes AIP Convention & 7/22 N.C. Yes AP National (See text) Certify 9/1 Convention D.C. Yes New party Petition: 8/15 N.D. Yes New party Petition: 9/29 260,000 sigs. 300 sigs. Fla. Yes New party Potition: 8/15 Ohio Yes AIP Convention 3/25 1% last Okla. Yes AP vote Convention 8/10 Ga. Convention & 5/9 Ore. No Yes AIP Ran in primary and lost. Potition: 6/14 Pa. No (See All applicable filing dates passed. 98,022 sigs. text) Hawaii Yes New party Petition: 6/9 R.I. Yes Indep. Petition: 7/28. 18 reg. 500 sigs. voters S.C. Yes AP Certify 10/4 Idaho Yes AIP Convention 6/30 S.D. Yes Indep. Petition: 9/2 III. Yes New party Petition: 7/31-8/7 2% prior vote 25,000 sigs. Tenn. Yes AP Convention Ind. See New Party Petition: 9/1 9/7 text 8,500 sigs. Tex. Yes New party Petition: 7/2 Iowa Yes AIP Convention 8/4-9/3 22,300 sigs. & Convention 9/19 Kans. Yes Consorvative Convention 6/20 Utah Yes AIP Convention 7/31 Kty. Yes A? Already Vt. Yes New party Petition: 9/20 qualified 1,535 sigs. La. Yes AP Certify 9/18 Va. Yes AIP Petition: 9/8 Me. Yes New party Petition: 6/19 9,105 sigs. Wn. 3,254 sigs. Yes New party Convention & 9/19 Petition: Md. No No Certificate of Candidacy Filed 9/26 100 sigs. Mass. Yes New Party Petition: 7/5 W. Va. No 56,038 sigs. All applicable filing dates passed. Wisc. Yes AP Mich. No (See Ran in primary and lost. Already qualified text) Wyo. Yes Yes New party Petition: 7/5-9/12 Indep. Petition: 9/27 Minn. 2,000 sigs. 5,815 sigs. (See text) Miss. Yes New party Petition: 9/27 1,000 sigs. June 12, 1972 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN MITCHELL FROM: HARRY DENT Dad Tom Turnipseed is substantially convinced Wallace will not run a third party effort for physical as well as ballot position reasons. He says John Decarlo, who is handling ballot position for Wallace, does not believe they can get on more than 30 state ballots now even with AIP help. Turnipseed told Decarlo he was thinking of joining the Nixon effort if Wallace did not run on the third ticket and Decarlo agreed this would be the thing to do. Turnipseed says Decarlo is the only knowledgeable attorney type in the Wallace camp. He is an assistant district attorney in Jefferson County and expects to be named a state judge by Wallace. Turnipseed can do nothing until after the Demo convention but is willing to go all out thereafter. copy: H.R.Haldeman 6/13 notwont worry about R Fin state, bregs Goc but can't worry use aim where we can - Mail - went very well -Brand new precents organing Donnelley - very bad - - need Precinet Organis + WO Blets's all Volunteers Reps beel only mailed to Reps - Dems + Inds went come rushing to P but after Conven Bettej now" nolon 7"goafter "me G - if attack want me G dont Hold off until often Concen - won't mere to Center" - P doing so well portudy, - Horten - not a hell of a lot contrast is levely really great 5 was baca across country - Opposed management types. 1701- letter al Mardian, -never went together certse well didn't aote to een note comp W/expertic but not poes -H - twelets Prectien- Pat Salisbery 6/14 J8m re conl/ol of Men eap pie's E pol mty 6/15 Joha H H Ial Paper 1sr. 200 for Geoge - today. A C - Connie Stuart to properdizing Convention +170 all - Housing in convention. Chico - refne Kristine MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON June 12, 1972 ADMINISTRATIVELY CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR: MR. H. R. HALDEMAN FROM: BRUCE KEHRLI BAK SUBJECT: McGovern Please note the attached comments from the June 12 Weekend News Review, Magruder and John Mitchell are aware of this comment from Lyn Nofziger and will reprimand him for it. cc: Alexander P. Butterfield 16 Semple, in NY Times, writes that "the men who are running RN's re-election campaign seem to worry about the prospect of a McG candidacy the closer they get to McG himself". While nat aides are confident they can pin 'radical' tag on George, Semple says others in primary states are cautious. One Calif. RN worker said: "Contrived or real, McG is projecting an impression of freshness, seriousness of purpose and candor, building himself for a direct confrontation with the old politics in Nov. 11 H. Itis good to run seared but His stupid to put out their line Semple, in earlier piecel says "the suspicion is that RN is richly enjoying the commotion" caused by his refusal to specify VP. He adds that new Connally mission, tho, has prompted some to ask if they aren't being conned "by a Pres whose taste for little surprises and grand theatre is beginning to make even the great Lyndon look like an amateur. Semple says WH staff feel VP Agnew will be on the ticket, but writers feels that the VP's ambiguity about whether he really wants the top job may affect RN's choice. Furguson writes that primary results "say clearly that moods and personalities matter far more to the voter in 1972 than issues and events". Thus RN, whose doing all he can to influence issues and events, may still face problems. RN "will be open to just the same kind of damaging contrast with McG" as HHH was in Calif. says Ernest. NY Times magazine has article by Rice on Sen. Smith of Maine. She faces a tough primary and/or reelection campaign, says author, as many feel she's old or hasn't done enough for Maine. C.S. Monitor's Strout writes that the "much-criticized US presidential primary system seems once more to have vindicated itself". Its cruel but effective ordeal by publicity has cut down the supposed front-runner, and brought another from obscurity into lead. And further, primaries have delineated the "major issue of the campaign the depth of the current of unrest and dissatisfaction running through US". "Many criticize Presidential primaries but it's hard to find an alternative", he concludes.