Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Source Description

This file contains: To: Tom Benham From: Len Milchuk RE: Latest breakdown on clippings concerning political polls. 1pg [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/21/1971

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
26146258
label
WHSF: Contested, 45-42
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26146258
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Contested, 45-42
description
This file contains: To: Tom Benham From: Len Milchuk RE: Latest breakdown on clippings concerning political polls. 1pg [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 6/21/1971
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Contested Materials Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26146258
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
9925f3392c2f5dd2
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 45 42 6/21/1971 Campaign Memo To: Tom Benham From: Len Milchuk RE: Latest breakdown on clippings concerning political polls. 1pg Thursday, March 15, 2012 Page 1 of 1 CC: John Holden Harry O'Neill Joe Goeke June 21, 1971 TO: TOM BENHAM FROM: LEN MILCHUK Here is the latest breakdown on clippings concerning political polls. Since the last report we have received 85 clips on the Scott story, Vietnam withdrawal, the May Day demonstrations, and Ron Ziegler's comments concerning the withdrawal poll. All of these stories are beginning to run down after a phenomenal life span of about a month. I believe we can attribute the longevity to the adage, "It's not what you say, it's who you get to say it." The press has been most favorable in reporting the withdrawal release. The recent clippings show various news syndicates carrying the poll and many editorial pieces. To cite two: The Roger Zion report was very favorable to ORC. However, I hope Roger has better circulation than the two clips we received from Paoli, Indiana, and Tell City, Indiana. Both papers were weekly with a combined circulation of about 7,000. Roscoe Drummond appears to be a "big gun" in journal- istic circles. We have received three clips with his by-line with a circulation factor of just under one million. In regard to our "balanced" releases on ecology and ideology shift to the left, we have yet to see any clips. This would appear to reinforce my original contention that "it's not what you say, it's who you get to say it." A Senator Scott or a Ron Ziegler citing our work is worth 50 three-martini lunches with members of the "Fourth Estate." Perhaps in the future we could get Martha Mitchell to say something nice about us and we would immediately become a household word. If you have any questions, please advise. LCM/jfs Attachment