Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Source Description
This file contains:
Position Paper on the 1972 Campaign - focusing on the American Electorate. 17pgs [Subject: Campaign] [Report], 4/18/1972
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
26146268
label
WHSF: Contested, 45-47
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26146268
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Contested, 45-47
description
This file contains:
Position Paper on the 1972 Campaign - focusing on the American Electorate. 17pgs [Subject: Campaign] [Report], 4/18/1972
citationUrl
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Contested Materials Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26146268
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
4a571216fb0e23b5
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library
Contested Materials Collection
Folder List
Box Number
Folder Number
Document Date
No Date
Subject
Document Type
Document Description
45
47
4/18/1972
Campaign
Report
Position Paper on the 1972 Campaign -
focusing on the American Electorate. 17pgs
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Page 1 of 1
II. The American Electorate
1. Total Voters
In 1972 an estimated 139.6 million Americans will be
eligible to vote. This is about 19.4 million potential
voters more than the 1968 total, or an increase of 16.1%.
Most of this large increase in eligible voters is attri-
butable to the 11.4 million 18-20 year olds who have been
newly enfranchised by the Voting Rights Act Amendment of
1970.*
In 1968 about 61% of those eligible actually voted in the
Presidential election. If that same percentage holds for
1972, there will be about 85 million votes cast this
November.
Est. Eligible Voters
Est. Actual Voters
%
1968
120.3
73.0
60.7
1972
139.6
84.7
60.7
2. Voting by Region of the U.S.
The South, with the greatest concentration of eligible
voters, has the lowest voter turnout of any region, while
the North Central region has the highest voter turnout and
provides the greatest number of actual voters.
More important, however, are the regions' electoral votes;
the South, with 169 electoral votes, has over 31% of the
nation's total, followed by the North Central, the North East
and then the West.
*
This act also enfranchises about 6 million other persons
who previously had been unable to pass literacy tests.
Regional Popular* and Electoral Votes
Actual Voters
Est.
Est.
as % of Eligi-
% of Total
Eligible
Actual
ble: 1968 &
U.S. Vote:
Voters
Voters
Est. 1972
1972
Electoral Vote 1972
% of
1968
1972
1968
1972
No.
Total U.S.
orth East
30.1
34.2
19.2
21.9
63.9
25.8
122
22.6
orth Central
33.1
38.2
22.2
25.6
67.1
30.3
145
27.0
outh
36.8
43.1
19.2
22.4
52.0
26.4
169
31.4
lest
20.3
24.2
12.4
14.8
61.3
17.5
102
19.0
(Popular vote shown in millions)
*
Source of popular vote data: March 1972 Population Estimates
and Projections, U.S. Department of Commerce
3. Voting by Sex*
In 1964, about 2 million more women than men reported casting
votes in the Presidential election. In 1968 the number of female
voters was about 3 million more than male voters. Based on this,
it appears that in 1972 women voters will outnumber male voters
again by about 3 million.
4. Voting by Occupation
In 1964 and 1968 just over half of all voters were white collar
workers and another third of all voters were manual workers.
Service occupations accounted for 10% of the vote, and farm
voters made up the remaining 5%. Although it might be expected
that the percentage of farm voters will decline and the voters
from service occupations will increase somewhat, the overall
complexion of voters by occupation is unlikely to change
substantially in 1972 ("students" are not listed as a census
occupation).
*
Voting breakouts by sex, age, occupation, education, race and
income are based on a U.S. Bureau of Census survey reported in
"Voting and Registration in the Election of November, 1968",
December 2, 1969. These data show that about 8% more people
said they voted than (the March 1972 voting report of the 1968
election indicates) actually voted. Accepting this
discrepency, the demographic breakouts of voters are still
useful for assessing and analyzing the electorate.
5. Voting by Family Income
In 1968 approximately 20% of those who said they voted
reported a total family annual income of less than $5,000.
About 40% reported earning between $5,000 and $10,000.
The remaining 33% who reported their family incomes placed
total earnings at $10,000 per year. These figures fluctuated
considerably from 1964 reports.
6. Voting by Education
The educational level of American voters is increasing, and
may be expected to continue to increase in the 1972 election and
beyond.
Educational Level of Voters
Less than high school grad. High school grad. Some or Grad College
1964
41.3%
34.6%
23.0%
1968
36.7
36.9
25.0
7.
Voting by Age
If Americans vote in about the same percentage by age group in
1972 as they did in 1968 (and 18-21 year olds vote in the same
proportion as 21-24 year olds in the last election), it is
estimated that the electorate would divide as follows:
Estimated 1972 Voters by Age
18-20
21-24
25-34
35-54
55+
Total
Est. # of
5.0
7.0
16.0
32.0
25.0
85.0
Actual
Voters
% of
6%
8%
19%
38%
29%
100%
Total
Voters
(Millions of voters)
8. Voting by Race
Based on 1964 and 1968 voting patterns, it is anticipated
that, of the estimated total 85 million voters, about 78
million, or 92%, will be white and approximately 7 million,
or 8%, will be Negro. No data are available on other races.
(See Exhibit 1 for estimated "actual" voting percentages in 1972.)
III. Voter Attitudes - Perceptions of the Candidates
It is probably impossible to separate voters' views of a
candidate's personal attributes and qualifications from
voter perceptions of the issues and how a candidate deals
with those issues. The voting decision, especially among currently
non-committed voters or those who are ticket splitters,
is likely based on a combination of feelings about both
the qualities of the candidates and the issues.
Research suggests several things about how voters see the
men who are now running for the Presidency:
1. Among those who approve of the way Richard Nixon is
handling his job, the major reason given for this
approval is the President's qualifications and attributes.
This is true for ticket splitters as well as the general
electorate, and holds for all sections of the country.
Approve/Disapprove of Way Nixon Is Handling His Job
Approve
Disapprove
Jan. '72 (Committee)
54%
35%
Jan. '72 (Gallup)
49
39
After China Trip
56
32
(Gallup)
(Total Sample)
Why Do You Approve? (Jan. '72 Committee)
Total
Ticket Splitters
Personal quali-
57%
54%
fications and
attributes
Ending the war
17
21
Economic policy
8
6
2. Those who disapprove of the President's job performance
also cite personal attributes as a major reason. This
appears to hold for all sections of the U.S.
Why Do You Disapprove?
Total
Ticket Splitters'
Personal dislikes
17%
23%
Hasn't kept promises
14
13
Done nothing about the
17
17
war
Economic policy
13
13
3. Overall, most Americans believe that Richard Nixon is
performing about average in comparison to previous
Presidents, with voters from metro areas and the East
slightly less inclined to rank Nixon as high as other
voters.
Total
Ticket Splitters
Metro Areas
East
Better than average
16%
17%
13%
12%
About average
61
66
59
66
Not as good as most
21
16
26
21
4. When asked to briefly describe Richard Nixon as a person, the
majority of responses are positive for all sections of the
country.
Total
East
Midwest
South
West
Sincere/Honest
19%
21%
15%
22%
17%
Integrity
Doing his best/
5
6
5
3
4
Dedicated
Intelligent/
8
7
6
11
8
Smart/Iducated
Strong-Minded/
8
9
7
8
7
Aggressive
5. When asked to rate the President and three Democrats
separately on a series of descriptive attributes:
a. Nixon emerges with the strongest image on the "profes-
sional" attributes ("experienced", "trained", "informed",
"competent") among all voter segments. His only
competition comes from Humphrey, who is rated equally
with the President in metro areas.
How Candidates Compare on Four "Professional" Attributes:
(Percent of Time Each Candidate First or Second)
Nixon
Muskie
Humphrey
Kennedy
Total Electorate
100%
25%
75%
25%
Ticket Splitters
100
25
75
-
East
100
25
75
25
Midwest
100
50
75
-
South
100
50
50
25
West
100
25
75
-
Metro
75
25
75
25
Non-Metro
100
25
75
-
b. On attributes relating to "trust" ("open-minded", "honest",
"just"), Nixon is perceived considerably behind Muskie,
except among the important ticket splitter group.
Humphrey and Kennedy receive overall ratings comparable to
the President, but fall behind among ticket splitters.
How Candidates Compare on Attributes of "Trust"
(Percent of Time Each Candidate First or Second)
Nixon
Muskie
Humphrey
Kennedy
Total Electorate
33%
100%
33%
33%
Ticket Splitters
100
100
-
-
East
33
100
33
33
Midwest
33
100
I
66
South
66
100
-
33
Nixon
Muskie
Humphrey
Kennedy
West
33%
33%
33%
33%
Metro
-
100
33
33
Non-Metro
100
66
-
33
Another indication of this public perception of "trust" is
seen in responses to questioning about the information which
the Nixon Administration releases to the public. About half
of the total group surveyed believes that the administration
"tries to make things more favorable than they really are."
A quarter of the respondents feel that information is "held
back or slanted". Only 19% believe that the administration
is "always frank and truthful".
C. In the area of "personal" qualities ("warm", "extro-
verted", "frank", "sense of humor", "relaxed"), the
President is viewed far less favorably than any of the
three Democrats. In addition, Edmund Muskie, probably
because he is not as well known, is seen by virtually all
voter groups as less personable than either Humphrey or
Kennedy.
How Candidates Compare on Five "Personal" Attributes:
(Percent of Time Each Candidate First or Second)
Nixon
Muskie
Humphrey
Kennedy
Total Electorate
-%
20%
80%
80%
Ticket Splitters
-
20
100
80
East
-
40
100
80
Midwest
-
40
100
80
South
-
60
80
60
West
-
60
60
80
Metro
-
20
80
80
Non-Metro
20
20
100
40
(See Exhibit 2 for rankings on each attribute. The attributes shown
above in categories of "professional", "trust" and "personal" were
of of response clusters.)
IV. Voter Attitudes - The Issues
Based primarily on research conducted in January, 1972, voter
attitudes on issues are as follows:
1. Vietnam - The war in Vietnam was viewed as the single most
important and the second most important issue facing the
United States today. Also, when asked specifically about
the war, 82% of all voters queried said that Vietnam is an
important problem to them. When asked which issue would be
most important in voting for a President, total respondents
and all sectional groups except the South cited Vietnam as
the most important voting issue.
The war appears to be seen as both a positive and negative
factor for the Nixon Administration. The President's
performance on the war is listed first as both the major
accomplishment of the Nixon Administration and also as the
major failure.
With the relatively low level of American troops currently
in Vietnam, and the troop withdrawel continuing, it will be
necessary to measure voter perceptions repeatedly over the
next half year to determine whether the war issue remains as
important as the January, 1972 study indicates.
2. The Economy -- This issue was listed after Vietnam as the most
important problem facing the U.S. Inflation is regarded as
an important personal problem to 82% of total voters, and
taxes, which may be indirectly related to economic conditions
in voters' minds, are viewed as an important personal problem
by 74% of the total sample.
Generally, the President's performance on economic issues
receives positive ratings from the majority of voters, with
the lowest overall ratings coming from voters residing in
metro areas and the East.
VOTER RATINGS OF NIXON PERFORMANCE -- ECONOMY
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
INFLATION
TAXES
Approve
Disapprove
approve
disapprove
approve
disapprove
Total:
49%
38%
64%
33%
56%
40%
Ticket Splitters
55
31
72
25
58
37
East
46
41
62
35
48
48
Midwest
52
36
67
29
56
40
South
47
39
62
35
60
36
West
53
34
66
32
56
38
tro
44
44
57
41
51
46
Non-Metro
52
33
65
33
58
38
3. Unemployment - This issue is rated behind Vietnam and the
Economy as the most important problem facing the country today,
although in non-metro areas and in the South umemployment
receives less emphasis than elsewhere. The problem is most
acute in metro areas, where 81% of those surveyed rate unemploy-
ment as a serious personal problem.
Unemployment should be anticipated as an issue which the opposi-
tion will attack heavily, since it is here that the President
receives low ratings for performance.
HOW WELL IS NIXON HANDLING UNEMPLOYMENT
Total Voters
Ticket Splitters
East
Midwest
South
West
Positive
42
43
36
41
48
42
Negative
54
52
60
55
46
54
Metro
Non-Metro
Positive
34
50
Negative
64
46
4. Crime and Drugs - Both these issues rate lower than the war and the
pocketbook issues of the economy and unemployment as the single and
second most important problems facing the nation today. However,
when asked to respond to specific problems in personal terms,
crime and drugs rank above all other issues.
In addition, voters tend to rate the President low on his handling of
the drug problem and are about evenly split in rating his performance
on dealing with crime.
HOW WELL NIXON IS HANDLING DRUGS/CRIME
Total
Ticket
East
Midwest
South
West
Metro
Non
Voters
Splitters
Metro
DRUGS
Positive
38%
44%
34%
40%
40%
37%
32%
39%
Negative
55
50
62
53
54
53
63
53
CRIME
Positive
46
48
40
48
49
46
42
47
Negative
50
49
54
49
47
47
55
49
5. Other Issues - Race relations are cited by voters, especially among
ticket splitters and those residing in the East, Midwest, and South
as one of the second most important U.S. problems. At the same
time, a majority of American voters from all sections of the country
believe that "treatment of Blacks is improving under Nixon". *
*
The sample size of the survey does not permit a breakout of
attitudes among Black voters.
The environment is not listed by voters as one of the nation's most
important problems, but 74% of respondents later said that
environmental pollution was an important personal problem.
In addition, 65% of all voters sampled would pay higher
taxes if the money were used to clean up the environment.
Only 20% disagreed with this proposal. Westerners and metro
area residents are most in accord with this concept.
Bussing is not cited in this research as a significant issue,
probably because the study was completed before the Florida
primary and other events brought this issue to the front.
The research does confirm, however, that three out of four
voters are in favor of integrated schools, but against bussing
as a means of integration.
Surprisingly, "general unrest" is considered to be a concern
which ranks behind only Vietnam and inflation as the issue
most important in selecting a President. The issue does not
surface among voters' lists of important problems facing the
nation today, and therefore may be the reflection of the
national concern over the social disruptions of the late 60's.
Another possibility is that "general unrest" is indicative of
an unarticulated, broad feeling of dissatisfaction with current
conditions in the U.S.
-
the same area that Wallace,
and now other Democrats, are attacking with their "populist"
approaches.
(See Exhibit 3 for full information on issues.)
-13-
V.
Voter Attitudes - Trial Heat Indications
There appear to be no available data on correlating
trial heat trends in presidential election years with
actual voting performance. Therefore, the value of
trial heat trends at various stages in an election year
as a predictor of election results is unknown. However,
trial heats do appear useful as:
a. Indications of general voter attitudes towards the
candidates,
b.
Reflections of voter response to events, such as a
Presidential action, a primary result, or some
outside influence,
c. A tracking of the opposition.
Reliable trial heat data on a national basis are currently
unavailable from Committee research. Published trial
heats from Gallup, Harris, etc. are being compiled for
the November Group's competitive analysis.
Briefly, here is where the President stands VS. potential
Democratic contenders, as shown in most recent public polls:
Three Way Race
Nixon
Muskie
Wallace
Not Sure
3/72 Harris
47%
35%
12%
6%
2/72 Harris
44
40
11
5
2/72 Gallup
43
42
10
5
Nixon
Humphrey
Wallace
Not Sure
3/72 Harris
48%
35%
12%
5%
2/72 Harris
47
36
12
5
2/72 Gallup
46
39
10
5
Nixon
Kennedy
Wallace
Not Sure
2/72 Gallup
47%
39%
9%
5%
11/71 Gallup
44
41
10
5
Nixon
McGovern
Wallace
Not Sure
2/72 Gallup
49%
34%
11%
6%
11/71 Gallup
49
33
12
6
Two Way Race
Nixon
Muskie
Not Sure
2/72 Harris
47%
45%
8%
15
1972 VOTING ESTIMATES - BY P GRAPHIC GROUP
PERCENT. OF TOTAL "ACTUAL" VO._ ESTIMATED
35%
27%
48%
LESS THAN
SOME OR
Male
HIGH SCHOOL
GRAD. COLLEGE
GRAD
52%
HIGH SCHOOL GRAD
Female
38%
TOTAL ELECTORATE: 85 MILLION
SEX
EDUCATION
NEGRO
18-24
8%
53%
14%
WHITE COLLAR
55+
25-34
29%
19%
SERVICE
11%
5%
34%
92%
35-54
FARM
MANUAL
WHITE
38%
OCCUPATION
RACE
AGE
Exhibit 3
THE ISSUES
Single Most Important
Second Most Important
Rank of Issues From "How
Rank of Issues Important in
Problem Facing U.S. Today
Problem Facing U.S. Today
Important a Problem is --
Deciding Vote for President
to You?
(%)
(%)
Total
Ticket Splitters
East
Midwest
South
Metro
Non-Metro
Total
Ticket Splitters
Midwest
South
Metro
Non-Metro
Total
Ticket Splitters
West
East
Midwest
South
West
Metro
Non-Metro
Total
Ticket Splitters
West
East
East
Midwest
South
West
Metro
Non-Metro
31
26
33
34
29
26
29
31
20
23
17
17
23
23
23
17
3
3
1
3
3
1
2
3
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
'1
Vietnam
2
2
1
2
2
2
16
18
17
15
18
13
17
15
14
13
16
11
15
12
13
15
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
Inflation/Economy
6
5
5
6
6
5
6
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
4
Unemployment
8 8 8 .9 5 10 11
5
7
5
7
7
4
10
9
4
5
Crime
6
6
7
8
6
4
9
3
5 4 7 5 4 5 6 3
1
1
2
2
1
3
1
2
7
6
5
5
7
8
'5
8
7
7
6
7
6 7 5 5 7 7 5 .9
6
4
8
7
6
2
5
7
2
2
3
1
2
2
3
1
6
7
6
6
Drugs
6
3
6
6
8
9
9
9
8
8
8
9
7
6
7
6
5
6
5
6
Race Relations
3
3
1
4
5
2
3
4
6
7
8
6
3
2
2
1
4
3
3
3
2
2
4
2
5
6
7
6
6
7
6
7
5
5
5
4
4
6
6
5
5
Taxes
3
2
3
3 3 2 2 3 5 3 4
5
7
3
5
6
4
5
4
6
5
7
7
5
5
6
8
5
5
3
5
7
5
4
5
Environment
2
1
2
9 10 10 10 9 9 10 10
8
8
8
7
8
9
7
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
Busing
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
General Unrest
2
2
3
1
1
2
1
1
3
4
2
3
3
4
2
2
7
8
8
8
5
7
9
7
3 1 2 3 3 3 2 3
Exhibit 2
RANKINGS ON ATTRIBUTES
Total
Ticket
Electorate
Split,
East
Midwest
South
West
Metro
Non-Metro
1.
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
2.
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
Experienced
3.
MUS
MUS
MUS
MUS
MUS/KEN
MUS
MUS
MUS
4.
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
-
KEN
KEN
KEN
1.
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
2.
HHH
EHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
Trained
3.
MUS
MUS
MUS
KEN
KEN
MUS
MUS
KEN
4.
KEN
KEN
KEN
MUS
MUS
KEN
KEN
MUS
1.
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
2.
HHH/KEN
HHH
HHH/KEN
MUS/HHH
KEN
HHH
KEN
HHH
Informed
3.
MUS
KEN
MUS
KEN
HHH
MUS
HHH
MUS
4.
-
MUS
-
-
MUS
KEN
MUS
KEN
1.
NIX
NIX
MUS
MUS
NIX
NIX
MUS
NIX
2.
MUS
MUS
NIX
NIX
MUS
MUS
HHH
MUS
Competent
3.
HHH
HHH
HHH
KEN
HHH
HHH
NIX
HHH
4.
KEN
KEN
KEN
HHH
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
1.
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
2.
MUS
HHH
MUS
MUS
MUS
MUS
MUS
MUS
Conservative
3.
HHH
MUS
HHH
6HH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
4.
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
1.
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
2.
HHH
MUS
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
Liberal
3.
MUS
HHH
MUS
MUS
MUS
MUS
MUS
MUS
4.
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIH
NIX
NIX
NIX
1.
MUS
NIN
MUS
MUS
NIX
NIX
MUS
NIX
2.
NIX
MUS
NIX
NIX
MUS
HHH
HHH
MUS
Honest
3.
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
MUS
KEN
HHE
4.
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
NIX
KEN
1.
MUS
NIX
HHH
KEN
NIX
MUS
MUS
NIX
2.
HHH
MUS
MUS
MUS
MUS
HHH
HHH
MUS
Just
3.
NIX
HHH
NIX
HHH
HHH
NIX
KEN
HER
4.
KEN
KEN
KEN
NIX
KEN
KEN
NIX
KEN
1.
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
MUS
NIX
2.
MUS
MUS
MUS
KEN
MUS
HEH
NIX
MUS
Safe
3.
HHH
HIIH
HHH
MUS
HHH
MUS
HHH
HER
4.
KEN
KEN
KEN
HHH
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
1.
NIX
NIN
NIX
MUS
KEN
NIX
NIX
KEN
2.
MUS
MUS
MUS
NIX
NIX/ HHH
KHH
MUS
HER
Tough
3.
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
MUS
MUS
HHH
MTS
4.
EHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
-
KEN
KEN
NIX
1.
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
2.
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
HHH
NIX
NIX
HER
Aggressive
3.
HHH
HHH
MUS
MUS
NIX
MUS
HHH
NIX
4.
MUS
MUS
HHH
HHH
MUS
HHH
MUS
MUS
1.
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
2.
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
HHH
NIX
NIX
HHH
Bold
3.
MUS
HER
MUS
HHH
NIX
MUS
HEH
NIX
4.
HHH
MUS
HHH
MUS
MUS
HHH
MUS
MJS
1.
MUS
NIX
MUS
MUS
MUS
KEN
MUS
KEN
2.
KEN
MUS
KEN
KEN
KEN
HHH
KEN
Й
--3
Open-Minded
3.
HHH
KEN
HHH
HHH
NIX
MUS
HEH
HEH
4.
NIX
HHH
NIX
NIX
HHH
NIX
NIX
MUS
Exhibit 2 Cont'd
RANKINGS ON ATTRIBUTES
Total
Ticket
Electorate
Split
East
Midwest
South
West
Metro
Non-Metro
1.
KEN
HHH
KEN
KEN/HHH
HHH
MUS
KEN
MUS
2.
HHH
KEN
HHH/MUS
MUS
KEN
KEN/HHH
MUS
HHH
Frank
3.
MUS
MUS
NIX
NIX
MUS
NIX
HHH
KEN
4.
NIX
NIX
-
-
NIX
-
NIX
NIX
1.
KEN
KEN
KEN/HHH
KEN
MUS
KEN
KEN
NIX
2.
HHH
HHH
MUS
HHH
KEN
MUS
HHH
HHH
Warm
3.
MUS
MUS
NIX
MUS
HHH
HEH
MUS
KEN
4.
NIX
NIX
-
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
MUS
1.
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
HHH
HHH
KEN
KEN
2.
HHH
HHH
HHH
HHH
KEN
KEN
HHH
HHH
Extroverted
3.
MUS
NIX
MUS
MUS
NIX
MUS
MUS
NIX
4.
NIX
MUS
NIX
NIX
MUS
NEW
NIX
MUS
1
KEN
HHH
KEN
KEN
HHH
KEN
KEN
KEN
2.
MUS
MUS
HHH
MUS
MUS
MUS
HHH
HHH
Relaxed
3.
HHH
KEN
MUS
HHH
KEN
HEH
MUS
MUS
4.
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIN
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIX
1.
HHH
HHH
HHH
KEN
MUS
HEH
HHH
HHH
2.
KEN
KEN
KEN
HHH
HHH
KEN
KEN
KEN
Sense of
3.
MUS
NIX
MUS
MUS
KEN
MUS
MUS
NIX
Humor
4.
NIX
MUS
NIX
NIX
NIX
NIN
NIX
MUS
1.
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
KEN
2.
MUS
NIX
HHH
NIX
MUS
MUS
MUS
NIX
Up to Date
3.
NIX
HEH/MUS
MUS
MUS
NIX
NIX
NIX
MUS
4.
HHH
-
NIX
HHH
HHH
HEH
HHH
HHH