Ask the Scholar

Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 1

OCR

Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 47 13 2/7/1972 Campaign Memo To: Staff Secretary. From: Charles Colson. RE: Action memo P-2009 Plesser Poll. 2pgs Tuesday, March 20, 2012 Page 1 of 1 P2009 February 7. 1972 MEMORANDUM FOR: THE STAFF SECRETARY FROM: CHARLES COLSON SUBJECT: Action Memo #P-2009 Plesser Poll Request It was requested in Action Memo #P-2009, taken from the February 1 News Summary to prepare a brief analysis of 4 recent Pleaser poll and of his organisation and techniques. Response I talked to Nelson Rockefeller's office with regard to Tully Pleaser. They have had a lot of experience with him and regard his work as totally unreliable. He is apparently for sale to the highest bidder. His most recent poll was done for Lindsay and Rockefeller's people suspect very strongly that this really was a Lindsay plant. The theory makes some sense. It shows Nixon beating Muskie which is to Lindsay's advantage. It also shows strong anti-Nixon sentiment which is also to Lindsay's advantage. It has been reported that Pleaser has just taken a Florida poll for Lindsay so he apparently is still doing Lindsay's work. John Becker has a similar report about Pleaser. He feels he is very unreliable and that there is no way to measure so-called "leverage issues". The Attorney General tells me that Pleaser is totally untrust- worthy. Scammen also discounts his pell. Sindlinger is the harshest of all. He has been asking since 1969 the question, "Would you vote today for the reelection of President Nixon 2. Since September the "mo" answers have averaged 15 percent. During that period of time Sindlinger has run 5 polls surveys. Each sample base has been 2000; hence there is a 10, 000 total sample base. In each poll the "no" answers have ranged between 14 and 16 percent. Pleaser reports that he used a similar technique and gets a 33 percent "no". In view of the very large sample base of Sindlinger, the Pleaser results would seem to be demonstrably in error. I further understand that Plesser wanted to work for the Campaign Committee and was turned down. He may well be bitter.

Document source description

This file contains: To: Staff Secretary. From: Charles Colson. RE: Action memo P-2009 Plesser Poll. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 2/7/1972

Page data

Page
1
Source index
0
Type
document
Media ID
317146512865b81a
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
26146410
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "26146410",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26146410",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "WHSF: Contested, 47-13",
    "description": "This file contains:\n\nTo: Staff Secretary. From: Charles Colson. RE: Action memo P-2009 Plesser Poll. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 2/7/1972",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26146410",
    "collections": [
        "Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection",
        "Contested Materials Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/10/1464/26146410/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-47/Contested-47-13.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/10/1464/26146410/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-47/Contested-47-13.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/10/1464/26146410/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-47/Contested-47-13.pdf",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "26146410",
    "label": "WHSF: Contested, 47-13",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26146410"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "26146410",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26146410",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "WHSF: Contested, 47-13",
    "description": "This file contains:\n\nTo: Staff Secretary. From: Charles Colson. RE: Action memo P-2009 Plesser Poll. 2 pgs. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 2/7/1972",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26146410",
    "collections": [
        "Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection",
        "Contested Materials Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/10/1464/26146410/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-47/Contested-47-13.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/10/1464/26146410/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-47/Contested-47-13.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/10/1464/26146410/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-47/Contested-47-13.pdf",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26146410",
    "naId": 26146410,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 1,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/10/1464/26146410/content/presidential-libraries/nixon/RN-RET/2546065/Contested-Box-47/Contested-47-13.pdf",
    "mediaId": "317146512865b81a",
    "ocrText": "Richard Nixon Presidential Library\nContested Materials Collection\nFolder List\nBox Number\nFolder Number\nDocument Date\nNo Date\nSubject\nDocument Type\nDocument Description\n47\n13\n2/7/1972\nCampaign\nMemo\nTo: Staff Secretary. From: Charles Colson.\nRE: Action memo P-2009 Plesser Poll. 2pgs\nTuesday, March 20, 2012\nPage 1 of 1\nP2009\nFebruary 7. 1972\nMEMORANDUM FOR:\nTHE STAFF SECRETARY\nFROM:\nCHARLES COLSON\nSUBJECT:\nAction Memo #P-2009\nPlesser Poll\nRequest\nIt was requested in Action Memo #P-2009, taken from the February 1\nNews Summary to prepare a brief analysis of 4 recent Pleaser poll\nand of his organisation and techniques.\nResponse\nI talked to Nelson Rockefeller's office with regard to Tully Pleaser.\nThey have had a lot of experience with him and regard his work as\ntotally unreliable. He is apparently for sale to the highest bidder. His\nmost recent poll was done for Lindsay and Rockefeller's people suspect\nvery strongly that this really was a Lindsay plant. The theory makes\nsome sense. It shows Nixon beating Muskie which is to Lindsay's\nadvantage. It also shows strong anti-Nixon sentiment which is also to\nLindsay's advantage.\nIt has been reported that Pleaser has just taken a Florida poll for\nLindsay so he apparently is still doing Lindsay's work.\nJohn Becker has a similar report about Pleaser. He feels he is very\nunreliable and that there is no way to measure so-called \"leverage\nissues\". The Attorney General tells me that Pleaser is totally untrust-\nworthy. Scammen also discounts his pell.\nSindlinger is the harshest of all. He has been asking since 1969 the\nquestion, \"Would you vote today for the reelection of President Nixon\n2.\nSince September the \"mo\" answers have averaged 15 percent. During\nthat period of time Sindlinger has run 5 polls surveys. Each sample\nbase has been 2000; hence there is a 10, 000 total sample base. In\neach poll the \"no\" answers have ranged between 14 and 16 percent.\nPleaser reports that he used a similar technique and gets a 33 percent\n\"no\". In view of the very large sample base of Sindlinger, the Pleaser\nresults would seem to be demonstrably in error.\nI further understand that Plesser wanted to work for the Campaign\nCommittee and was turned down. He may well be bitter."
}