Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Source Description
This file contains:
From Charles Colson to Fred Malek. RE: Communications with RNC. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 3/2/1972
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
26146641
label
WHSF: Contested, 49-25
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26146641
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Contested, 49-25
description
This file contains:
From Charles Colson to Fred Malek. RE: Communications with RNC. 1 pg. [Subject: Campaign] [Memo], 3/2/1972
citationUrl
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Contested Materials Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26146641
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
4ef09ea4bf219d80
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library
Contested Materials Collection
Folder List
Box Number
Folder Number
Document Date
No Date
Subject
Document Type
Document Description
49
25
3/2/1972
Campaign
Memo
From Charles Colson to Fred Malek. RE:
Communications with RNC. 1pg.
Monday, June 04, 2012
Page 1 of 1
DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD [NIXON PROJECT]
DOCUMENT
DOCUMENT
NUMBER
TYPE
SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS
DATE
RESTRICTION
N-C
Note
"Chack to Fred" Re. Tuttle
3/10/72
C(Nixon)
(DOC#111) N-2
Milimo
Colson to malek Rl. Nofziger 3 successor
at the RNC
3/2/72
N-3
Pepirt
[00C#113]
Report from RNC to
Ee; "Ethnic
Prior ity States for 1772"
N.D.
C(Nixon)
N-4
Numo
[DOCH 114]
Malei to Haldeman Re. Tolbert
3/19/71
C(Nixon)
N-5
memo
[DUC+135] [DUCH 135]
Draft Malek to Haldeman Re. Tolkert
WID.
(Nixon)
N-6 Comemo
Polson to Ladd Re: "Republican National
[DOCH 115)
Finance Committee
3/17/71
C(Nixon)
FILE GROUP TITLE
BOX NUMBER
Malek
Y
FOLDER TITLE
Republism National Comm Hoe
RESTRICTION CODES
A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy.
E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
B. National security classified information.
financial information.
C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual's
F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law
rights.
enforcement purposes.
D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy
G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material.
or a libel of a living person.
H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material.
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
NA FORM 1421 (4-85)
Presidential Materials Review Board
Review on Contested Documents
Collection:
Frederic V. Malek
Box Number:
4
Folder:
Republican National Committee (RNC) [June 1970 - June 1972]
Document
Disposition
111
Return Private/Political
112
Return
Private/Political
113
Retain
Open
114
Retain
Open
115
Retain
Close
Invasion of Privacy
135
Retain
Open
3/10
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
3/10/72
Fred:
Bob was involved in one aspect
of Tuttle's horror story and has
agreed to call Evans and order
him.
Chuck
3/10 RNC
MEMORANDUM
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
March 2, 1972
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FRED MALEK
FROM:
CHARLES COLSON
This is simply to confirm our phone conversation last
evening regarding Lyn Nofziger's successor at the
Republican National Committee.
I think Buttram, if Dunlap is not interested, is the best
choice that we have and I would suggest that we proceed
forthwith. One problem that arose in my discussion
with Buttram, as I told you, is that he indicated that the
signal he was given by Cliff Miller and Shumway at the
Citizens Committee was that he was to take all directions
from them all policy guidance, etc. He specifically
asked them apparently how he would get signals from the
White House.
He was told that White House signals would be fed through
1701. This is of course absurd. We need to keep direct
lines into the National Committee and we don't need to layer
one bureaucracy on top of another. Obviously 1701 and our-
selves have to keep in close coordination and if Dunlap
gets conflicting signals then it is up to the Campaign Com-
mittee and us to resolve. I would appreciate your insuring
that this is clear in Buttram's mind as well as the Committee's.
By the way, Dunlap claims he has never been interviewed and
is, in fact, interested. I don't think we should settle this
finally until someone has at least had a look at him.