Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Source Description
This file contains:
From Strachan to Haldeman RE: "President's Papers and Estate Plan" 1 pg. [Subject: Personal] [Memo], 4/12/1972
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
26147093
label
WHSF: Contested, 53-35
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
26147093
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
WHSF: Contested, 53-35
description
This file contains:
From Strachan to Haldeman RE: "President's Papers and Estate Plan" 1 pg. [Subject: Personal] [Memo], 4/12/1972
citationUrl
collections
Richard M. Nixon's Returned Materials Collection
Contested Materials Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
26147093
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
e5b5181d8f434812
ocrText
Richard Nixon Presidential Library
Contested Materials Collection
Folder List
Box Number
Folder Number
Document Date
No Date
Subject
Document Type
Document Description
53
35
4/12/1972
Personal
Memo
From Strachan to Haldeman RE: "President's
Papers and Estate Plan" 1pg
Monday, June 25, 2012
Page 1 of 1
DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD [NIXON PROJECT]
DOCUMENT
DOCUMENT
NUMBER
TYPE
SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS
DATE
RESTRICTION
N-1
Memo
From Strachan to: Haldeman, Re:
[DOC# 84]
President's Paper and Estate Plan"
4/12/72
C
N-2
Memo
from Korologos to: Haldeman Re;
[DOC*85]
Update on status of proposed
amendment Ri: Tax deduction
1/31/72
C
FILE GROUP TITLE
BOX NUMBER
STAFF SECRETARY
126
FOLDER TITLE
PapeRs Project [II]
RESTRICTION CODES
A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy.
E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
B. National security classified information.
financial information.
C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual's
F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law
rights.
enforcement purposes.
D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy
G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material.
or a libel of a living person.
H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material.
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
NA FORM 1421 (4-85)
Presidential Materials Review Board
Review on Contested Documents
Collection:
Staff Secretary
Box Number: 126
Folder:
Paper Project [II]
Document
Disposition
84
Return Private/Personal
85
Retain Open
ADHINISSRATIVILY CONFIDENTIAL
April 12, 1972
MEMORANDUM FOR:
H. R. HALDEMAN
FROM:
GORDON STRACHAN
SUBJECT:
President's Papers and
Estate Plan
The President's Papers and Estate Plan is drifting off
track again. Just before the China Trin you directed Dean
to "get it done before it becomes moot." Nothing happened,
30 I drafted a memorandum for John Ehrlichman's signature to
Dean on March 21st. Dean responded with an interin report
indicating that the Acting General Counsel of IRS would begin
working on some of the basic tax questions.
All this results in indecision and delay. You told me in
August that the President considered Dick Ritzel of Mudge
Rose the best estate lawver around. Ritzel's plan, after
due doliberation with Demarco, was submitted on December 23,
1971. It is John Dean's view that DeMarco and Ritzel are in
a contest. The only loser is the President.
It is my view that Dellarco's interim stop-gap Will proposal
is the worst result possible because it will delay a decision
until after November 7, 1972. If the President loses the
election, the goals of the President's Papers and Estate Plan
will be thwarted.
The solution seems to be for you and Ehrlichman to make the
decision whether the entire project is to be delayed until
after the election. If that is the case, you should approve
Dean's attached memorandum urging the President to execute
a stop-gan Will tomorrow when he meets with DeMarco. If vou
and Phrlichman decide to resolve the conflict between DeMarco
and Ritzel, you should disapprove Dean's memorandum and direct
him to have the final plan to you and Ehrlichman for review
by Hay 1st.
GS/jb