Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
258225334
label
Postal Reorganization (1 of 3)
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
258225334
contentType
document
title
Postal Reorganization (1 of 3)
collections
White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)
William E. Timmons's Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
258225334
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
2e007e9d485f6dc3
ocrText
March 20, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR BILL TIMMONS From: Dick Cook Bill Kendall called to say that Postal strike has spread to Northern New Jersey and that their District Office has received over 50 constituent phone calls this morning - most either blaming RN or wondering why doesn't he do something about it. Kendall suggested that if their experience is similar to other affected areas that RN should consider going on TVtto explain what brought about the situation and the strenuous efforts he is making to improve mail service and the lot of postal workers thru the Corporation and overall reform. Before retalitory moves are made against the unions for employees, Bill's suggestion might have much merit. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library file mr. Cook- Agi MEMORANDUM DATE: March 18, 1970 TO: Gene Cowan FROM: Paul N. Carlin SUBJECT: Postal Reform Real On March 12 the House PO&CS Committee voted to accept a compromise proposal on Postal Reform. By a margin of 17 to 6 the Committee voted to substitute the language of the com- promise for the language of H.R. 4 (the Dulski Bill) as marked up by the Committee. This compromise has both the support of the Administration and of the National Association of Letter Carriers. Highlights of the compromise bill include the following provisions: 1. Creation of a public authority, known as the U.S. Postal Service Authority, to operate the postal system. 2. Formation of a 13-member Executive Council to direct the activities of the Authority. 3. The formation of the 13-member Advisory Board, composed of representatives of postal labor organizations, major mailers, and the general public, to advise the Executive Council on rates, services, and employee compensation. 4. The creation of postal career service. The Civil Service Retirement System will be retained in full. Political tests or qualifications will be prohibited. 5. Collective Bargaining will determine compensation, benefits and terms of employment. Bargaining impasses are subject to a 90-day cooling off period with fact finding, followed by binding arbitration, if needed. Management must (through collective bar- gaining) reduce the waiting time for the top pay rate in-grade from the present 21 years to 8 years or less. 6. Up to $10 billion in bonds may be issued. The Treasury may be required to purchase up to $2 billion and can purchase more at its option. Treasury guarantee of all bonds is authorized. The Authority is given until January 1, 1978, to bring its costs and revenues into balance. During the transition a general public service subsidy is authorized. Special public service allowances will continue indefinitely. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library -2- 7. Rates for each class of mail must cover, as a minimum, all costs demonstrably related to that class. A panel of 3 Presidentially- appointed Rate Commissioners will hold public hearings on rate proposals and make its recommendations to the Executive Council. The Executive Council has authority to change rates; only public members, however, may vote on rate issues. Rate decisions of the Executive Council can be overturned by a two-thirds vote of, either House of Congress during a 60-day period. 8. Provision for a two-step salary increase for postal employees (PFS 1-6 and rural carriers) effective January 1, 1970 (average increase of more than 5. 4%). No further action will be taken on the compromise bill until minority views have been submitted. The next step will be consideration of the bill by the House Rules Committee. Once a rule has been granted, the bill will then go to the House floor for consideration by the entire membership, probably during the first half of April. After concluding its open hearings, the Senate PO&CS Committee deferred action on postal reform until the House Committee reported its bill. The Senate Committee staff. has drafted a proposed bill which is described in the enclosed attachment. There are numerous objectionable features in this proposed Committee draft. - which was only released to the Committee members this morning - a few hours before their Executive Session. We strongly favor the version of H.R. 4 which is described in this memorandum. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library RESUME OF PROPOSED BILL DRAFTED BY SENATE PO&CS COMMITTEE 1. The Post Office Department would continue as an executive department with the Postmaster General appointed by the President for 10. term of seven years. 2. The Postmaster General is authorized to borrow up to $10 billion from the Secretary of the Treasury by issuing postal bonds which shall be amortized over a period of 30 years and repaid by direct appropriations from the Congress and not by postal revenues. 3. The Postmaster General is authorized to bargain collectively with recognized employee unions with provi- sions for binding arbitration in the event of labor disputes. 4. The Postmaster General is authorized to set postage rates through an independent Postal Rate Commission which rates shall not be submitted to Congress for approval; 5. Establishes a public service allowance equal to 10% of annual costs of operations to be appropriated by the Congress. In determining the necessity for a rate increase the Postmaster General shall subtract from estimated expenditures 10% plus 1/2 of the amount spent for postal modernization out of bond revenues. If the estimated revenue does not equal estimated expenditures as redućed, he shall request a rate increase 6. The Postmaster General is authorized to classify mail through the Rate Commission. 7. All mailers within any class of mail shall pay the same rate, but for a period of 10 years after enactment, non-profit organizations and other mailers who now pay preferential or special rates shall be given special rate treatment to absorb the necessary. adjustment. Regular mailers (newspapers and business mailers) who now pay less than cost, but not at in- tentionally preferential rates by law, will have a five- year period of adjustment. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library 2 8. Postal employees remain in the competitive civil service and retain civil service retirement and veterans' preference benefits. Other fringe benefits may be negotiated, but any direct or indirect money benefits now received shall continue in effect until changed by negotiations. 9. The transportation provisions of the bill provide: a. Star route carriers will have their contracts negotiated only where the rate exceeds $25,000 per year; b. Motor common carriers are authorized to carry the mail by contract; C. The Postmaster General is authorized to contract for the air carriage of mail under limited circumstances with CAB approval or without CAB approval where no scheduled carrier serves the route and authorizes by law the present air taxi program. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Postal Refun January 23, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR THE POSTMASTER GENERAL FROM: JOHN EHRLICHMAN SUBJECT: POSTAL PAY I agree with you that it is important that the Administration's position on the postal pay question be very explicitly stated and that all of us involved in the issue take a consistent line. The following reflects my understanding of the Administration's position with which you and I are in agreement based on our phone conversation this morning. "It is the position of the Administration that the comparability issue cannot be related to the postal pay reform package now being considered. Postal employees will be treated on the same basis as all other Federal employees while they remain in the Federal service. As to any subsequent Federal pay legislation which may be recommended by or approved by the President, the adjustment contained in the present legislation will not be deducted. The Administration's comparability pay recommend- ations contained in the budget include postal employees." The foregoing leaves all of the President's options open as to when and what basis he will accept comparability. It does say that we will not treat postal employees differently if and when there is a general Federal pay increase. I do not suggest that we issue this statement publicly but rather that it be a guide for all of us in dealing with Congress and/or the unions. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON filestal Pay November 20, 1969 TO: EUGENE COWEN BILL TIMMONS FROM: HENRY C. CASHEN I SUBJECT: H.R. 13000 Attached is a rough outline from Bob Hampton with respect to his position on H. R. 13000. As I think I told you, Hampton and Red Blount met with Senators McGhee and Fong to discuss the possibility of trading a pay increase for postal reform. Bob Mayo has approved the pay increase which Blount is talking about and Senator McGhee will approach the unions. Mayo strongly suggests, and I agree, that the White House should be involved prior to Blount's considering proposal. any counter-offer Dah " " by the unions to his pay increase 11/21 Attachment. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library OUTLINE OF APPROACH TO BE TAKEN IN TESTIMONY ON H. R. 13000 (Assuming no opportunity for acceptance of Administration proposal) 1. Very strong opposition to H. R. 13000 -- reasons in President's letter and others on principle. 2. Pay is essentially a problem of Employee Management Relations. 3. Weakness in present system is not so much a concern with principle of pay comparability with private enterprise but a feeling of inadequate participation of employee unions and representatives in the pay-setting process. 4. H. R. 13000 gives this type participation to employees but at the same time denies the President, the Chief Executive Officer, a true opportunity to exercise his responsibility in any meaningful way. 5. Present circumstances -- strong pressure for a pay increase from postal unions -- desire of classified to be treated equally -- Administration's postal reform proposal setting negotiating rights with postal unions on pay -- severe budgetary restrictions for fiscal '70 -- exclusion of the President from pay setting machinery make it practically impossible to come up with meaningful pay reform proposals which address themselves to solving the principal problems. This does not mean that the Executive wants to diminish the important role of the Congress in setting pay policy or in reviewing administrative decisions respecting changes in pay levels or structure. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library 2 6. It is our recommendation: One: that H. R. 13000 be rejected by this committee. Two: that for the next year the committee mandate the Administration to: A. Extend, under present system spelled out in 1962 Act, meaningful consultation to the unions in the pay setting procedures to the maximum extent possible. B. Establish comparability rates effective April 1, 1970 and an additional pay increase April 1, 1971. C. Meet with qualified union representatives within the next few months with the objective of submitting a joint pay reform proposal to the Congress. This proposal shall recognize the three essential elements in the pay picture. (1) The Role of Congress --- Which of course we would not attempt to determine - as our proposal would be submitted to the Congress not in the form of a bill -- but a study leaving a total option on this point to the will of Congress. (2) The Role of Unions -- In terms of participation on structure of survey -- setting of payline -- machinery to resolve differences with the President's agents (BOB and CSC). (3) The Role of the Executive Branch -- In terms of Presidential responsibility -- operations of systems -- principles to be followed. In summation -- in order to establish effective machinery, recognition must be given to the employer-employee relationship ⑉⑉ principles and policy binding on both parties as established by Congress -- credibility in terms of proper pay for employees and acceptance by the taxpayer. Only by meeting these principles will we be able to meet our obligation in a acceptable to the parties involved reduce acrimony -- and truly establish way a better system for handling pay (which gives due recognition to contemporary problems). Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Postal Reform MAJOR PROVISIONS OF THE POSTAL REFORM AND SALARY ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1970 CREATION OF A PUBLIC AUTHORITY, KNOWN AS THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, TO OPERATE THE POSTAL SYSTEM. FORMATION OF A 13-MEMBER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL TO DIRECT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE AUTHORITY. TWO-STEP SALARY INCREASE FOR PFS EMPLOYEES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1970 (AVERAGE 5.4% INCREASE). Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL (13 MEMBERS) 2 FULL-TIME MEMBERS 7 MEMBERS APPOINTED SELECTED BY PRESIDENTIALLY BY PRESIDENT, APPOINTED COUNCILORS CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE * 4 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DESIGNATED BY DIRECTOR GENERAL SPEAKER OF HOUSE HOUSE MINORITY LEADER DEPUTY PRESIDENT PRO TEM OF DIRECTOR SENATE GENERAL SENATE MINORITY LEADER THE POSTAL SERVICE * NO MORE THAN 4 FROM SAME POLITICAL PARTY Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library THE ADVISORY COUNCIL (13 MEMBERS) REPRESENTING PUBLIC AT LARGE BY REPRESENTING APPOINTE REPRESENTING POSTAL LABOR MAJOR MAILERS DIRECTOR GENERAL VICE CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CHAIRMAN DIRECTOR GENERAL ADVISES EXECUTIVE COUNCIL ON RATES, SERVICES AND EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library PERSONNEL POSTAL CAREER SERVICE Civil Service Retirement System retained in full Political tests or qualifications prohibited Veterans' Preference retained CSC must approve adverse action procedures for non-represented employees COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TO DETERMINE COMPENSATION, BENEFITS, TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT Initial contract to be effective January 2, 1971 Bargaining impasses subject to 90-day cooling-off period, followed by automatic binding arbitration, if needed No bargaining over fringe benefits for first two years Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library FINANCES AND RATES Up to $10 billion of Bonds may be issued, maximum of $2 billion per year. Treasury may be required to purchase up to $2 billion and, at its discretion, may purchase more. Authority given until January 1, 1978 to balance costs and revenues (augmented by public service appropriations). Rates for each class of mail must cover all costs demonstrably related to that class. Panel of Rate Commissioners holds public hearings on rate proposals and makes its recommendations to Executive Council. Executive Council has authority to make rate adjustments. Public hearings required prior to major service changes. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library BILL INCORPORATES MANY FEATURES OF H.R. 4, INCLUDING HOUSE COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS DECLARATION OF POLICY FUNCTIONS OF POSTAL MODERNIZATION AUTHORITY STATUTORY RECOGNITION OF EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS PROHIBITION ON POLITICAL INFLUENCE TRANSPORTATION PROVISIONS COMPTROLLER GENERAL FREEDOM TO DETERMINE FREQUENCY AND EXTENT OF AUDITS Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library AND, IN GENERAL, THE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 11750 RELATING TO: POSTAL SERVICES AND MAIL MATTER COMPARABILITY OF POSTAL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS WITH THE NON-FEDERAL SECTOR CONTINUATION OF PRIVATE EXPRESS & INTERNATIONAL MAIL STATUTES CONTINUATION OF CRIMINAL LAWS (FRAUD, OBSCENITY, THEFT OF MAIL, ETC.) AS STATUTES EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF POWERS TO THE CONGRESS Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MAJOR PROVISIONS OF THE POSTAL REFORM AND SALARY ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1970 CREATION OF A PUBLIC AUTHORITY, KNOWN AS THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, TO OPERATE THE POSTAL SYSTEM. FORMATION OF A 13-MEMBER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL TO DIRECT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE AUTHORITY. TWO-STEP SALARY INCREASE FOR PFS EMPLOYEES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,1970 (AVERAGE 5.4% INCREASE). Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL (13 MEMBERS) 2 FULL-TIME MEMBERS 7 MEMBERS APPOINTED SELECTED BY PRESIDENTIALLY BY PRESIDENT, APPOINTED COUNCILORS CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE * 4 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DIRECTOR DESIGNATED BY GENERAL SPEAKER OF HOUSE HOUSE MINORITY LEADER DEPUTY PRESIDENT PRO TEM OF DIRECTOR SENATE GENERAL SENATE MINORITY LEADER THE POSTAL SERVICE NO MORE THAN 4 FROM SAME POLITICAL PARTY Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library THE ADVISORY COUNCIL (13 MEMBERS) REPRESENTING PUBLIC AT LARGE BY REPRESENTING POSTAL LABOR APPOINTE REPRESENTING MAJOR MAILERS DIRECTOR GENERAL VICE CHAIRMAN DEPUTY DIRECTOR CHAIRMAN GENERAL ADVISES EXECUTIVE COUNCIL ON RATES, SERVICES AND EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library PERSONNEL POSTAL CAREER SERVICE Civil Service Retirement System retained in full Political tests or qualifications prohibited Veterans' Preference retained CSC must approve adverse action procedures for non-represented employees COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TO DETERMINE COMPENSATION, BENEFITS, TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT Initial contract to be effective January 2, 1971 Bargaining impasses subject to 90-day cooling-off period, followed by automatic binding arbitration, if needed No bargaining over fringe benefits for first two years Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library FINANCES AND RATES Up to $10 billion of Bonds may be issued, maximum of $2 billion per year. Treasury may be required to purchase up to $2 billion and, at its discretion, may purchase more. Authority given until January 1, 1978 to balance costs and revenues (augmented by public service appropriations). Rates for each class of mail must cover all costs demonstrably related to that class. Panel of Rate Commissioners holds public hearings on rate proposals and makes its recommendations to Executive Council. Executive Council has authority to make rate adjustments. Public hearings required prior to major service changes. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library BILL INCORPORATES MANY FEATURES OF H.R. 4, INCLUDING HOUSE COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS DECLARATION OF POLICY FUNCTIONS OF POSTAL MODERNIZATION AUTHORITY STATUTORY RECOGNITION OF EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS PROHIBITION ON POLITICAL INFLUENCE TRANSPORTATION PROVISIONS COMPTROLLER GENERAL FREEDOM TO DETERMINE FREQUENCY AND EXTENT OF AUDITS Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library AND, IN GENERAL, THE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 11750 RELATING TO: POSTAL SERVICES AND MAIL MATTER COMPARABILITY OF POSTAL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS WITH THE NON-FEDERAL SECTOR CONTINUATION OF PRIVATE EXPRESS & INTERNATIONAL MAIL STATUTES CONTINUATION OF CRIMINAL LAWS (FRAUD, OBSCENITY, THEFT OF MAIL, ETC.) AS STATUTES EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF POWERS TO THE CONGRESS Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library June 11, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR BILL TIMMONS FROM: DICK COOK The House Committee on Rules this afternoon granted a rule to the Postal Reform bill. It provides for four hours, open rule, waiving points of order against the Committee-reported bill and the Udall-Derwinski substitute, making it in order for the House to consider the Udall-Derwinski bill as an amendment in the nature of a substitute, and the Committee reported amendments as an original bill for the purpose of amendments. The rule is everything we wanted except for denial of the request that the rule provide for the deletion of the retroactive pay feature from the Udall-Derwinski substitute. This would have been highly irregular. In any event, we will now have to seek to have the May 15 retroactive pay date removed by Floor amendment -- a difficult task unless the unions under Biemiller's direction realize approval of the Henderson amendment hinges on deletion of retroactivity. CC: Henry Cashen Bill Casselman Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library EYES ONLY THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON ROUTE SLIP APPROVAL DATE BT KB DG M EC DC JN BC After circulation, please return to: B.C. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Good job end excellent conclusion. D.C. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Pls BC - circulate BI staff EYES ONLY March 25, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN EHRLICHMAN BRYCE HARLOW FROM: DAVID A. NELSON SUBJECT: Deficiencies in S. 3613 As requested earlier today by the Postmaster General, here is a brief outline of some of the deficiencies in the McGee-Fong postal reform bill. We did not see this 106-page bill until last Friday, and we have, of course, been occupied by other matters since then. Because of the haste in which the bill was reviewed and the summary prepared, this memorandum may contain some errors of commission: in any event, we have certainly omitted much that could have been said. The outline will, however, give you the general trend of our thinking. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library EYES ONLY ORGANIZATION The Post Office would remain an Executive department, subject to a variety of rigid statutory constraints with respect to personnel, fiscal and other matters. Postmaster General would have a statutory seven-year term, and could not be fired for mediocre performance. While the President would be free to drop the Postmaster General from his Cabinet if desired, the Postmaster General -- even when not of the President's party -- would remain in the statutory line of succession to the Presidency, directly behind the Attorney General. PERSONNEL Postmasters and all other postal employees except "the heads of such offices as the Postmaster General deter- mines" would be appointed in the Competitive Civil Service. This makes it difficult for the Department to hire the right kind of people in the numbers that are needed, forces us to hire the wrong kind of people for many j obs, and locks us in to a cumbersome personnel program that is very poorly adapted to the needs of a modern commercial enterprise. Collective bargaining unit determinations, representation questions and unfair labor practice proceedings would all be left with the Assistant Secretary of Labor, rather than the NLRB. While the NLRB leaves much to be desired, it is somewhat more insulated from political pressures than the Assistant Secretary of Labor is, and it has statutory enforcement powers that the Assistant Secretary of Labor lacks. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library EYES ONLY The criminal sanctions of the Labor-Management Reporting Act (Landrum-Griffin) would not apply to the postal unions. The union shop would not be a bargainable issue, even in non-right-to-work states. While this is arguably an advantage, Ted Klassen believes that the power to bargain over the union shop, where not prohibited by state law, would give us tremendous leverage in negotiations with the unions, and could be of critical importance in making the fundamental reforms in our personnel program that are essential to an efficient operation. The Norris-LaGuardia Act would be made applicable, and Federal courts could not issue temporary restraining orders or injunctions against strikes like those experienced in the past week. 2 Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library EYES ONLY FINANCES AND RATES The Post Office Department would never be self-sustaining. - Congress would be subsidizing the Department and thus the mail users by huge annual appropriations equal (under my interpretation of some very ambiguous language) to the revenue foregone on free and reduced rate mail, plus 10% of the sum of the Department's operating costs and 1/2 of the amount expended from borrowed funds on capital im- provements. The deficit that Congress would underwrite for- ever, under this formula, would be substantially in excess of $1 billion a year. A subsidy of this magnitude would insure excessive political influence on the Post Office through the Congress; encourage excessive use of the postal system in preference to other forms of communication; and promote sloppy and inefficient management practices. While the Postmaster General could borrow a total of up to $10 billion, as under H.R. 4, he could not borrow more than $750, 000, 000 in any one year. H.R. 4 permits annual borrowings of up to $2 billion, of which $500, 000, 000 could be for operating expenses. Under S. 3613, borrowed money could be spent only on capital improvements. All borrowings would necessarily be from the Treasury; direct access to private investment capital would be barred. This has at least two drawbacks: the discipline of having to satisfy private lenders. of the efficiency of our operation would be lost; and all of our borrowings would necessarily be in- cluded in the portion of the public debt that is subject to the statutory debt ceiling. Reproduced at the Richard 3 Nixon Presidential Library EYES ONLY GAO apparently would be given power to disallow Post Office Department expenditures. The Bureau of the Budget would apparently retain its power of apportionment with respect to capital improvement funds. (This question was very thoroughly discussed when the Administration's original reform proposal received BoB clearance. At that time Dr. Burns argued very persuasively -- and successfully -- that the apportionment power is inappro- priate insofar as a reformed Post Office is concerned. The Department's power to forgive claims against its own employees and others would be unreasonably restricted and would be made subject to GAO control to an undesirable degree. The postal rate structure could apparently be changed only once a year, thereby ruling out the continuous "fine tuning" of the rate structure that we ought to have. A rate commission appointed in a way that could well make it a highly political body would make annual recommendations on rate changes to the Postmaster General; the Postmaster General could only accept or reject these recommendations, and could not make appropriate modifications. In lieu of a Congressional veto over rate changes, the courts would be empowered to overturn rate changes not considered to be supported by substantial evidence on the record. The bill would make no provision for interim rates pending litigation -- a glaring deficiency in view of the abor-intensive character of the postal business. The third class mailers have been lobbying very hard indeed for exactly this type of rate setting mechanism, and Senator McGee (or his staff) obviously got the message. Mail classification would be handled in accordance with the same unworkable procedures. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library EYES ONLY TRANSPORTATION Authority to contract with supplemental air carriers granted under H.R. 4 -- would be eliminated. Authority to contract with certificated air carriers would be limited to situations in which at least 5, 000 pounds of mail no more than 5% of which could consist of letter mail -- would be transported on each flight. The CAB would have a veto power over any such contract. All such contracts would have to run for at least one year. None of these restrictions is found in H.R. 4. SUMMARY The President began his message of May 27, 1969, by saying that "Total reform of the nation's postal system is absolutely essential. 11 S. 3613 would private halfway reform. While substantially increasing the Postmaster General's authority, it would leave an excessive degree of control in the hands of Congress and the Congressional committees. The Department would thus continue to be exposed to the kinds of political influences that have historically been the bane of its existence. Whatever legislation is enacted now may well prove to be something we shall have to live with for a long time to come; we had better get it right the first time, because we may not have a second chance. The President is sure to get much of the credit -- or blame -- for whatever reform bill is passed. The public is not likely to discriminate very carefully among the different brands of postal reform now being peddled; in the public eye, any legislation enacted under the postal reform label is going to be widely accepted as the "total reform" called for by the President. No reform at all - - for the time being -- might well be preferable to a reform bill that fails to give us the tools we need to do the job right. 5 Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Henry Cashen discussed Williams resolution w/ Edrlichman + agrees it should be held 2:25 2: Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library THE WHITE House wASHINGTON BT I have "unofficially" informed Holland of the WH and POD positions on the Williams resoluátion.The Senate will take no action either today or Saturday. Holland recommends that we get back to him Monday AM with an updated reading. BC 3/20 Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Kill Recil Holland, Gritfin uriliims Resolution same of Senate Readetion, nevalters fed crimal offense 1 PMG take meanus enfore 2 Atty. Gen. 11 11111 3 Aely actu un resolutin - in colender. lleverliste curester curl firing -- theat that ven way out. nodemacher -- Nature STube. Baulen aboutly as Ceyan To, voise whge. elevedutty enfore the - blording . Actentive -- Postfe refer. July 1470- halm m magning. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library BT Carlin just came out of a meeting with the PMG. The PMG would prefer that the Senate delay action on the Williams resolution. and instead take up They do not wish to force the issue at this point, in view of Rademacher's meetings withthe 2nw m progen PMO feels that buln w oling in Ceyal Ti Noite wogn ure that to free the cow at the purt used why a notice state. Jan we wath all n that thit thy Carl not carry -WAT -- the they urine are the muls live to relue all currence white to Sulty neefn delay acturn & resonts. Shilty weeky al noderwche us Caul Holland FTY W.H. "wnoffurch" P.O. nufits delay with un willium resolite for tene Gury. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Post Post of September 9, 1969 TO: Bryce N. Harlow FROM: Bill Timmons The PMG called me at 7:00 a.m. this morning to make certain that Postal Reform was on the Presidential "MUST" list. I assured him it was. Also, this week sometime Blount requests a meeting with you to develop strategy for movinggthe reform measure through the PO & CS committee. He'll call after he gets a firmer nose count. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON April 14 - 4:45 p.m. POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT REPORT 1.) On April 13 the House of Rep. passed the Treasury and Post Office Departments and Executive Office of the President Appropriations bill for fiscal 71. The bill earmarks $8.2 billion for the Post Office Department. 2). The House of REpresentatives today passed by voice vote, legislation to provide a 6% salary increase for federal employees, thus clearing the bill for the President's signature. 3). The Transportation Subcommittee of the House Interstate & Foreign Commerce Comm. -- H.R. 16879, a bill to amend the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 by providing for the establishment of mail rates by a tariff filing procedure, today heard testimony in support of the bill from the CAB and the Air Transportation Association of America. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON April 2, 1970 - 5:00 p.m. POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT LEGISLATIVE REPORT 1. Senate P.O. & C.S. Committee met in executive session legislation. today to continue consideration of postal reform 2. Government and postal union negotiators today agreed on a 6% pay increase for all federal employees and military personnel retroactive to December 27, 1969 and and additional 8% increase for postal workers will be provided following enactment of postal reform legislation. 3. Yesterday Congressional Liaison gave advance notice to members of congress of the appointment of Carl Wessell as Deputy Regional Director for the Post Office Department at Chicago. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON April 13, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR WILLIAM CASSELMAN AND BILL TIMMONS FROM: HENRY C. CASHEN II I. Substantive elements of new proposed postal reorganization and pay bill: Organizational Structure (a) Reorganized Post Office Department known as "The United States Postal Services" becomes an independent establishment in the Executive branch of government. (b) Postmaster General appointed by, serves at pleasure of, Commission on Postal Costs and Revenues, which has 9 public members named by President and confirmed by Senate. Labor Relations (a) Collective bargaining on wages and working conditions as in private sector. (b) Ban on federal employee strikes continues, binding arbitration if bargaining impasse persists 180 days from start of bargaining. (c) NLRB supervises union elections and enforces unfair labor practice actions. Finance, Rates, and Rate-Making (a) Post Office can borrow up to $10 billion from Treasury or general public. (b) Rate changes subject to public hearing before 3-man Postal Rate Board named by President; final rate decision by Commission Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Page 2 on Postal Costs and Revenues, but subject to veto by two- thirds vote of either House or Senate. (c) Post Office to be generally self-supporting by January 1, 1978. Pay (a) 8% pay increase for employees of Post Office Department effective upon enactment. (b) Promptly after enactment, collective bargaining will be required on wages, hours, and working conditions. Resulting agreement will compress to 8 years the time for postal employees to reach top step in whatever labor grade may be established. II. Talking points : (1) The participants who in one form or another helped to negotiate the agreement and legislation, such as George Meaney; the Postmaster General; Secretary Shultz; Deputy Postmaster General Ted Klassen; Assistant Secretary Bill Usery, and other union leaders present, should be congratulated on the outstanding job which they have done in reasonably and effectively achieving this agreement on postal reorganization. (2) The job of the labor unionSand the Executive Branch of the Government is now completed and the President should recommend that Congress move as expeditiously as possible in enacting this legislation on postal reorganization. Congress has been most cooperative and understanding with respect to the various events which have tran spired over the past three weeks. It is now the responsib responsibility of the leaders of both the House and the Senate who are assembled here to insure passage of the legislation that will bring a new fairness to postal employees, a new efficiency to the system itself, and a long overdue equity to the taxpayer. (3) The President should reemphasize that each part of this agreement which he believes to be a solution to our postal problem is related to the other parts; together, they make up a package of fairness that the public and the workers deserve. (4) Attached is a copy of the revised pay rate schedule. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library March 12, 1970 TELEPHONE CALLS CONGRESSIONAL Rep. Ed Derwinski (R-I11) RECOMMENDED BY: William E. Timmons REASON: To thank him for his help on postal reform. TALKING POINTS: 1. Today the House Post Office & Civil Service Committee reported out the Administration's substitute for Chairman Dulski's postal reform bill, HR 4. 2. Berwinski was the most aggressive Republican leader, holding GOP troops, and arguing for meaningful postal reform. (We're told Bob Corbett, the senior Republican, had the courage to vote "present.") H.R. Gross voted against the substitute and another GOP opponent, Bill Scott, was absent. Otherwise good party support. 3. The President may want to ask Ed about the chances for a good Rule and quick House action. 4. Rep. Morris Udall (D-Ariz) was the most helpful Democrat in Committee. However, no telephone recommendation is made because of "Mo's" political ambition in Arizona. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library P.O. March 12, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT From: William E. Timmons After months of frustration the Administration's postal reform bill was reported out of the House Post Office Committee this morning 17-6. Actually, the Post Office Department's version was offered as a substitute fo Chairman Dulski's bill. Much credit goes to Postmaster General Blount for this signal victory. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON April 16, 1970 4:45 p.m. POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT LEGISLATIVE REPORT 1). The President announced the agreement reached between the Post Office Department and representatives of the Postal Union on reorganization of the Post Office and additional wage increases for postal employees. The agreement includes a reorganizationof the Post Office Department as an independent self-supporting agency within the Executive Branch of the government with removal of the Postmaster General from the Cabinet. Also included is an 8% salary increase for postal employees effective upon enac tment of the reorganization plan. 2) Congressional Liaison gave advance notice of the postal reorganization/salary increase agrement to the congre-sional leadership and Members of the House & Senate Post Office & Civil Service Committees. An outlineand fact sheet of the proposal was made available to every Member of Congress by late after- noon. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library 4-16 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON B J Bumillu has already buffed the Postal Uniox types. - We will out still get the Members through the Rose Garden Room door of the Cabinel will The union people set-up for Blount - & Meany remain for the press Ehrlishman will send as requested out for Dulski $ Corbert Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential the WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON April 15, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT From: William E. Timmons Subject: Postal Reorganization Briefing Thursday, April 16, 1970 11:00 a.m. The Cabinet Room A list of participants is in Tab A. A suggested agenda is in Tab The principal features of the postal reorganization agreement are in Tab C. You may wish to lead your guests from the 10:45 a.m. meeting into the Cabinet Room where some of the bi- partisan leaders and officers of the postal unions will be assembled. Ron Ziegler will be prepared to bring into the Cabinet Room photographers from the White House press corps. You will probably want to congratulate the labor officials and members of the Executive Branch on achieving the postal reorganization agreement. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library IN THE CABINET ROOM AND ALL MEMBERS HAVE BEEN INFORMED TO ENTER SOUTHWEST GATE AT 11:00 or earlier. April 16, 1970 PARTICIPANTS Executive () The President Winton Blount, The Postmaster General E. T. Klassen, Deputy Postmaster General Congress Senator Mike Mansfield Senator Gale McGee Senator Hiram Fong Rep. Carl Albert Rep. Gerald Ford Rep. Thaddeus Dulski Rep. Robert Corbett Labor George Meany, President, AFL-CIO Francis S. Filbey, President, United Federation of Postal Clerks James H. Rademacher, President, National Association of Letter Carriers Herbert F. Alfrey, President, National Rural Letter Carriers Association Lonnie Johnson, President, National Association of Post Office Mail Handlers, Watchmen, Messengers & Group Leaders Monroe Crable, President, National Association of Post Office and General Services Maintenance Employees Chester W. Parris, President, National Federation of Post Office Motor Vehicle Employees Michael J. Cullen, President, National Association of Special Delivery Messengers James J. LaPenta, Director of the Laborers' Federal Public Service Division James C. Gildea, Executive Assistant to Mr. Meany Andrew J. Biemiller, Legislative Director, AFL-CIO Staff Bryce N. Harlow John Ehrlichman Bill Timmons Henry Cashen Ron Ziegler Herb Klein Paul Carlin, Executive Assistant to the Postmaster General Ken BeLieu Lyn Nofziger Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library April 15, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR THE STAFF SECRETARY From: William E. Timmons On the Pastmaster General's request we are adding three guests to the 11:00 a.m. meeting on postal reorganization in the Cabinet Room, Thursday, April 16. They are: 1. Mr. Lane Kirkland Secretary-Treasurer, AFL-CIO 2. Mr. Tom Harris General Counsel, AFL-CIO 3. Mr. David Nelson General Counsel, Post Office Department CO: John Ehrlichman Dwight Chapin Henry Cashen Ron Ziegler White House Police Chief Usher Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library April 16, 1970 AGENDA 11.00 - 11.85 a.m. Greeting and photos The President S Office 11:00 - 11:10 a.m. Photo opportunity for press corps The Cabinet Room 11:10 - 11:15 a.m. President's remarks 11:15 - 11:30 a.m. Briefing on Agreement by Postmaster General Blount 11:30 - 11:35 a.m. Response by George Meany 11:35 - 11:45 a.m. Leaders' Discussion 11:45 a.m. Adjournment 11:50 a.m. Press briefing by Blount and Meany The Press Room Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library orer , AI lixqA 1045- McGee + Fong АСИЗДА oval 1, John will Bull pm 1055 - Dulshit Corbett satong 20.55- 06.11 OF OIT equa 7- unin edrs hany back .M.B OI:II I 00:11 тооя Jenids0 sdT Bemeller charges them to go exismer a'dnobiser9 .m.5 21:11 - 01:11 Congo vent по patteing .M.B 08:11 - 21:11 Censis улвем yd .m.s 28:11 - 08:11 no Done 19559J .m.s 24:11 - 28:11 .m.5 CA:II Cong types yd pritterid out 22979 Rose .m.s Idn 02:11 ульем тооя aserg edT Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE 4-16 WASHINGTON B.J. Block it sending the attached plus the agreement to the Hill as 1:00 pus to coincide with our distribution. for Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library POSTAL REORGANIZATION AND SALARY ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1970 CHART EXPLANATION CHART 1 - TITLE The Postal Reorganization and Salary Adjustment Act of 1970 is the embodiment of an agreement between the U.S. Post Office Department and the nationally recognized postal unions. CHART 2 - HIGHLIGHTS Reorganizes the Post Office Department as an independent establishment within the government, having continuity of top management, workable methods of finance, and appropriate control over postal rates. The Act provides for collective bargaining over wages, hours and working conditions and an 8% salary increase for postal employees effective upon enactment. CHART 3 - COMMISSION ON POSTAL COSTS AND REVENUES The 11 member Commission is composed of 9 public members appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate and the Postmaster General and Deputy Postmaster General, who are selected by the 9 public members. CHART 4 - THE ADVISORY COUNCIL The Council consists of 13 presidentially appointed members: 3 representing the public at large, 4 representing postal labor and 4 representing major mailers. The Postmaster General serves as Chairman of the Council. The Council advises the Commission on rates, services, and employee compensation. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library - 2 - CHART 5 - PERSONNEL - CAREER SERVICE Civil Service retirement benefits for all postal employees are retained in full. Political tests or qualifications are prohibited. Veterans preference retained. CHART 6 - PERSONNEL - COLLECTIVE BARGAINING Negotiations between labor and management must begin promptly upon enactment. Prohibition against federal employee strikes is continued. Binding arbitration is provided to settle impasses still unresolved by the parties 180 days after the start of bargaining. Compensation and benefits must be comparable with the private sector. Through collective bargaining, the top in-grade pay rate must be compressed from the present 21 years to 8 years or less. NLRB will supervise union elections and enforce unfair labor practice actions. CHART 7 - FINANCES The Postal Service can borrow up to $10 billion from the Treasury or general public. The Postal Service must be self-supporting by January 1, 1978. CHART 8 - RATES Rates for each class of mail must cover, as a minimum, all costs demonstrably related to that class. The Postmaster General proposes rate changes, the Postal Rate Board holds public hearings and makes rate recom- mendations to the Commission on Postal Costs and Revenues. Public members of the Commission vote on rate issues. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library - 3 - Rate decisions of the Commission may be overturned by two-thirds vote of either House of Congress during a 60-day period. CHART 9 - TIMETABLE This chart lists the principal events which will take place upon enactment of this legislation. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library April 13, 1970 PROPOSED POSTAL REORGANIZATION AND PAY BILL Organizational Structure Reorganized United States Postal Service becomes an independent establishment within the Executive Branch of the Government. Postmaster General appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the Commission on Postal Costs and Revenues, which has 9 public members named by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Labor Relations Collective bargaining on wages and working conditions to be authorized as in the private sector. Ban on federal employee strikes continues; binding arbitration if bargaining impasse persists 180 days from start of bargaining. National Labor Relations Board to supervise union elections and enforce unfair labor practice actions. Finance, Rates, and Rate-Making Post Office can borrow up to $10 billion from the Treasury or general public. Rate changes subject to public hearing before 3-man Postal Rate Board named by President; final rate decision by Commission on Postal Costs and Revenues, but subject to veto by two-thirds vote of either the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate. Post Office to be generally self-supporting by January 1, 1978. Pay 8% pay increase for employees of Post Office Department effective upon enactment. Promptly after enactment, collective bargaining will be required on wages, hours, and working conditions. Resulting agreement will compress to 8 years the time for postal employees to reach top step in whatever labor grade may be established through collective bargaining. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library 3rd Draft - Postal Reorganization 4/13/70 Safire/Nelson/Cashen/Harper TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES My message of April 3 outlined the preliminary agreement that the Government reached with its postal employees after the end of the recent postal work stoppage. In that agreement, the Post Office Department and the postal employee organizations affiliated with the AFL-CIO under- took to negotiate and jointly sponsor a postal reorganization and pay bill to be recommended to the Congress as a measure that might ultimately lead to a cure of the problems that have been festering for years in the postal system. The negotiations went forward in an atmosphere of good will and good faith on both sides, and they have now culminated in agreement on a legislative proposal that would -- Convert the Post Office Department into an independent establishment in the Executive Branch of the Government, freed from direct political pressures and endowed with the means of building a truly superior mail service, Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library -2- -- Provide a framework within which postal employees in all parts of the country can bargain collectively with postal management over pay and working conditions, and - - Increase the pay of postal employees by 8%, over and above the Government-wide increase of 6%, and shorten the time required to reach the top pay step for most postal jobs I support the legislation that has been agreed to in the negotiations between the Post Office Department and the postal unions, and in transmitting it to the Congress I urge that it be given prompt and favorable consideration. I. The United States Postal Service The negotiators quickly agreed that the structure of the nation's postal establishment should be one that will permit the postal system to operate on an independent, self-contained basis. This means that for the first time in generations, the Post Office will be run by people whose authority will be commensurate with their responsibilities, it means that the Post Office will carry its own burden and not be a burden to the taxpayer, and it means that the Post Office will be run in the public interest of all Americans and not in the political interest of any individuals. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library -3- Fourteen months ago, I pledged that this Administration would do its best to end the system of political patronage that has been plaguing the Post Office for the better part of the past two centuries. We have kept that promise; looking to the future, only basic changes can provide permanent insurance against a rebirth of partisan politics in the Post Office. The legislation that the postal negotiators have agreed upon, and that I now endorse, would build a firewall between postal affairs and political patronage. I propose that the Post Office Department be reorganized as an independent establishment. known as "The United States Postal Service. 11 The new establishment would be organized in a way de- signed to make it at least as free from partisan political pressure as such presently existing independent establishments as the Federal Reserve System, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Postmaster General would no longer be a member of the Cabinet, under this proposal, and the Postal Service would be insulated from direct control by the President, the Bureau of the Budget and the Congress. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library -4- Instead of being appointed directly by the President, the Postmaster General would be selected by nine public members of a bipartisan Commission on Postal Costs and Revenues. These nine Commissioners not more than five of whom could be from the same political party -- would serve nine-year statutory terms, under appoint by the President withthe advice and consent of the Senate. The Postmaster General, who would hold office at the pleasure of the Commissioners, would be vested with full authority to manage the day-to-day operations of the Postal Service The legislation would provide the new Postal Service with the means of achieving -- Continuity of top management, withthe tenure of the Postmaster General based on performance and not on politics, -- - Appropriate control over postal rates, with a Postal Rate Board holding full and fair hearings on rate changes proposed by the Postmaster General, and with either House of Congress being empowered to veto proposed rate changes by a two-thirds vote, -- - A self-supporting postal system, - A workable method of raising necessary funds by borrowing from the Treasury Department or from the general public, and Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library -5- -- Collective bargaining over wages, hours and, in general, all working conditions that are subject to collective bargaining in the private sector These were essentially the goals spelled out in the proposal for postal reform that I sent to the Congress in May of last year. The independent postal establishment on which agreement has now been reached would provide an excellent means of achieving those goals. Any proposal for massive reform of a Government organization as important as the Post Office Department is bound to generate opposition from those who have a vested interest in preserving the status quo. In this instance, however, the initial opposition to postal reform has largely melted away in the face of the urgent national requirement for a better postal system. Further delay in starting on the road towards postal excellence would be indefensible. II. Postal Employee-Management Relations The negotiators have agreed that there should be a statutory framework for collective bargaining in the postal establishment resembling that of private industry. The people of this nation cannot and will not submit to the coersion of strikes by employees of the Federal Government. Since strikes by employees of the new Postal Service must be prohibited, a workable alternative to strikes must be provided -- an absolutely Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library -6-, impartial means of resolving differences between postal management and postal employees without the public being subjected to interruptions in the postal service. That is what the proposed legislation agreed upon by the postal negotiators provides. I propose that the new United States Postal Service be empowered to engage in collective bargaining with recognized employee organizations over wages, hours, and working conditions generally, with negotiating impasses being finally resolved, if necessary, by binding arbitration. Determination of collective bargaining units, recognition of collective bargaining representatives and adjudication of unfair labor practice charges would be handled by the National Labor Relations Board under procedures similar to those that have long been followed in the private sector. In addition to wages and hours, matters that are subject to collective bargaining would include such things as grievance procedures, final and binding arbitration of disputes, seniority rights, holidays and vacations, life insurance, medical insurance, training and promotion procedures. Employee benefits enjoyed today would be carried forward, and, in the case of rank and file postal employees, any change in such benefits would be subject to the collective bargaining process. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library -7- Negotiations over new labor agreements would be expected to begin ninety days before the expiration of existing agreements, and there would be a statutory guarantee of final and binding third party arbitration to resolve negotiating impasses after a ninety day cooling- off period, an outside fact-finding panel would try to assist the parties in reaching agreement, and opportunities for mediation and conciliation would be provided. All postal employees would retain their full benefits under the Civil Service retirement system and under the existing Federal workmen's compensation laws. The provisions of the Veterans Preference Act would continue 10 apply, as would the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The labor standards provisions to which Government contracts are made subject would be made applicable to contracts entered into by the new Postal Service. Finally, the right of every postal employee to petition Congress would be expressly preserved by statute. III. Postal Pay In many parts of the country -- particularly in our great urban areas the pay of postal employees has lagged seriously behind the pay received for comparable work by employees in private industry. The general 6% increase has alleviated that problem for most employees Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library -8- of the Federal Government, but it fails to take into account two important considerations that are unique to the Postal Service - - The need to offset the limited opportunities for job advancement that most postal workers have traditionally faced, and -- The need to allow postal workers to share the benefits of the increases in efficiency and productivity that should be attainable under a properly reorganized postal system. These factors played an important part in the thinking of the pos tal negotiators during their di scussions on the pay question. I propose an additional pay increase of 8% for postal employees, effective immediately upon enactment of the reorganization law, with prompt collective bargaining over pay schedules under which the time required for rank and file postal employees to reach the top pay step in their respective labor grades will be compressed to not more than eight years. IV. Postal Rates As the new Postal Service will be self-contained, so should it be self-supporting, as it will be non-profit, SO should it be non-loss. If the pay increases that the postal negotiators have agreed to recommend are put into effect promptly, and if postal rates were to remain where they are today, postal expenditures would exceed postal Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library -9- income in 1971 by approximately two and one-half billion dollars A postal deficit of this magnitude would be indefensible at any time, during a period when inflation is threatening the economic well-being of every American family, such a deficit would be totally irresponsible. Last week I proposed a plan for raising first, second and third class postage rates to a level that would bring postal income fully into balance with anticipated postal expenditures. This plan included a proposal for increasing the price of the first class stamp to ten cents. Understandably, this met with limited enthusiasm, yet it provided a specific illustration of the true cost to the user of our mail service. In the course of negotiations, an alternative proposal was made to cushion the immediate effect of the application of the principle of pay-as-you-go on the users of the mail. Under this plan, the general taxpayer would pay 10% of the total cost of the new postal service in the first year, with that percentage of support de- clining each year until the mails were completely self-supporting by the end of calendar 1977. Though the goal would be delayed, the acceptance of the principle of pay-as-you-go -- even in stages is a fundamental breakthrough. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library -10- I prefer an immediate end to subsidication, but since the principles of pay-as-you-go and postal reform are so important, I am ready to accept this gradual but steady approach to that goal. I also prefer the method of raising most of the needed new revenues from first-class users, since three out of four letters in this classification are business mail, first class mail -- contrary to popular belief does not now pay its own way. Again, however, I consider the principles of pay-as-you-go and postal reform to be overriding, and I am willing to make adjustments in my original proposals so as to raise more revenues from other classes of mail as well. In the interest of making realistic progress toward the objectivé of bringing postal expenditures into balance with postal revenues, I now propose to -- Increase the price of the first class stamp to eight cents; -- Keep the price of the air mail stamp at ten cents, - - Increase second class postage rates an average of 50%, and -- Increase third class bulk rates an average of one third (the same percentage increase as first-class), while increasing third class single piece rates from six cents to eight cents. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library --11- These rate increases will generate additional revenues of $ , enough to put the new, independent United States Postal Service on the road to a sound, pay-as-you-go basis, with the 10% contribution by the Federal taxpayer completely phased out in 1977. V. Toward Postal Excellence Neither better pay nor better organization will, in and of itself, guarantee better mail service. Laws do not move the mail, nor do dollars. What moves the mail is people -- people who have the will to excel, the will to do their work to the very best of their ability. The United States is fortunate to have such people in its postal system today. As the Postmaster General has urged, these people must be retained, in the years ahead, more like them must be recruited. This legislation would represent an important step toward that end. Enactment of the legislation that I now propose would give our postal employees the means to attain a goal they have never before had the means of attaining -- the goal of building, in America, the best postal system in the world. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library --12- That is a goal worth striving for. With this postal reform legislation, it is a goal that can be achieved. Mail users, postal employees and the nation as a whole have gone through a long ordeal in reaching the threshold of basic postal reform - - but we have come a long way. The Congress is now presented with the opportunity to pass legislation that will bring a new fairness to postal employees, a new efficiency to the system itself, and long overdue equity to the taxpayer. Taken together, this is a package of fairness, and I urge the Congress to deliver it promptly; it is eagerly awaited by those who need better mail service and those who need greater opportunity in a revitalized postal system. 0 Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library THE WHITE house WASHINGTON POST OFFICE 1. The House PO & CS Cte met in Executive Session both this morning and afternoon to continue consideration of a H.R. 17070, the Postal reorg and sałary adjustment act of 1970. Chairman Dulski announced that the Cte will continue afternoon and evening sessions until action is completed on the postal reform bill. 2. The Senate PO & X CS has scheduled Executive ssession for Tuesday, May 12th to consider postal reform leg. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 7, 1970 - 4:30 p.m. POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT LEGISLATIVE REPORT The House P.O. & C.S. Committee met in executive sesssion to consider the House Benefits bill and take up amendments to the Postal Reform legislation. No action was taken. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 20, 1970 POST OFFICE REPORT 1. The Postmaster General met with Minority Leader Jerry Ford to discuss strategy for enactment of H.R. 17070, the Postal Reorganization and Salary Adjustment Act of 1970. 2. The House Subcommittee on postal rates continued its hearings on postal rate increase legislation. Testimony was heard from the American Association of Nurseymen, Mail Order Association of Nurserymen, and the National Newspaper Association in opposition to the proposed rate increases. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 13, 1970 POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT REPORT 1. The Senate P.O. & C.S. Committee met to hear an explanation of a new committee print on postal reform legislation submitted late last night by Chairman McGee. Chairman McGee gave a brief explanation of the proposal, characterizing it as a "compromise". Following the committee meeting Senator McGee made a statement to the press in which he expressed the hope that the committee would favorably report the proposal by Thursday afternoon or Friday at the latest. The proposal provides for several changes in the rate-making procedure and includes a 10% "public service" subsidy for the postal service. 2. The House Subcommittee on Postal Rates continued hearings on postal rates increases. Testimony was heard from the Magazine Publishers Association, Newsweek Magazine, American Newspaper Publishe Association and other representatives of the media. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 14, 1970 POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT REPORT The House Subcommittee on Postal Rates continued hearings on postal rate increase legislation. Testimony was heard from former Postmaster General J. Edward Day, representing the direct mail advertising association, and representatives of the Agricultural Publishers Association and the Associated Third Class Mail Users. Mr Day expressed his continued opposition to postal reform along the coporate idea, but admitted that it now appears that postal reform will be enacted by this Congress. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library May 21 - 5:00 p.m. POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT LEGISLATIVE REPORT 1. The scheduled meeting of the Senate P.O. & C.S. was postponed until Friday, May 22 when Chairman McGee returns from Wyoming. 2. The scheduled executive session of the House P.O. & C.S. was cancelled due to lack of business. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 20, 1970 POST OFFICE REPORT 1. The Postmaster General met with Minority Leader Jerry Ford to discuss strategy for enactment of H.R. 17070, the Postal Reorganization and Salary Adjustment Act of 1970. 2. The House Subcommittee on postal rates continued its hearings on postal rate increase legislation. Testimony was heard from the American Association of Nurseymen, Mail Order Association of Nurserymen, and the National Newspaper Association in opposition to the proposed rate increases. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 14, 1970 POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT REPORT The House Subcommittee on Postal Rates continued hearings on postal rate increase legislation. Testimony was heard from former Postmaster General J. Edward Day, representing the direct mail advertising association, and representatives of the Agricultural Publishers Association and the Associated Third Class Mail Users. Mr Day expressed his continued opposition to postal reform along the coporate idea, but admitted that it now appears that postal reform will be enacted by this Congress. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library To:B ill Timmons Office of the President The White House Dich must watch! 30 From- Hugh Newton Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 13, 1970 POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT REPORT 1. The Senate P.O. & C.S. Committee met to hear an explanation of a new committee print on postal reform legislation submitted late last night by Chairman McGee. Chairman McGee gave a brief explanation of the proposal, characterizing it as a "compromise". Following the committee meeting Senator McGee made a statement to the press in which he expressed the hope that the committee would favorably report the proposal by Thursday afternoon or Friday at the latest. The proposal provides for several changes in the rate-making procedure and includes a 10% "public service" subsidy for the postal service. 2. The House Subcommittee on Postal Rates continued hearings on postal rates increases. Testimony was heard from the Magazine Publishers Association, Newsweek Magazine, American Newspaper Publishe Association and other representatives of the media. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Past Office A COALITION OF EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS RIGHT TO WORK NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE 1900 L STREET, N. W. . WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036 TELEPHONE: 296-0720-AREA CODE 202 The following statement was released by Congressman David N. Henderson (D-North Carolina) Thursday, May 14. "I have recently been quoted by the press as saying that while I plan to offer on the House floor an amendment to H.R. 17070 guaranteeing to all postal employees the right to join or refrain from joining unions that I 'don't have any confidence that it will pass. ' "This is in error. I did express a lack of optimism about the prospects for my amendment to be approved by the House Post Office and Civil Service Committee, but I have consistently stated that I felt considerably more optimistic about its chances of approval by the House. "As a matter of fact, if the Republican members honor the pledge made in their 1968 national platform, I have no doubt that it will pass. They have a plank in that platform opposing compulsory unionism, and if they support their platform, they will vote for my amendment. Their vote, coupled with that of those on the Democratic side who we can depend upon, will be enough to assure passage. " Hugh C. Newton Director of Information National Right to Work Committee Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library DAILY NEWS, FRIDAY, MAY 15, 1970 53 HN DAILY NEWS The Inquiring THE DARK AT THE TOP OF THE STAIRS 120 East 42d St. NEW YORK'S PICTURE NEWSPAPER= (212) MU 2-1234 Fotographer Great Published daily except Sunday by New York News Inc. President, F. M. Flynn Secretary, W H. lames Treasurer, J. J: 1.ynch Address: 220 E. 42d St. New York. N. Y 10017 By JIMMY JEMAIL / have THE NEWS will pay $10 for each Mail subscription rates per year: U.S. Daily $22.00; Daily and Sunday $33.00. Canada, Mexico. Central and South America Daily $25.00; Daily and Sunday $38.50. question accepted for this column. Original Armed Forces Special Rates Daily $14.00; Daily and Sunday $21.25. Today's award goes to A. Cleve- land, P.O. Box 684, Sag Harbor, L.I. MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ad The Associated Press is entilled exclusively to the use for republication of all THE QUESTION the local news printed in this newspaper as well as all AP news dispatches. Admissions officers at Ivy POST OFFICE REFORM League colleges fear rising costs will drive away middle-class stu- seems to be making some progress in Congress, spurred dents. What do you think? by threats of a possible second postal strike. WHERE ASKED The Senate Post Office Committee-chairman, Sen: Uptown Manhattan Gale W McGee (D-Wyo.)-agreed THE ANSWERS Wednesday on a compromise bill Robert H. Warren, Broadway, reported to suit the Nixon ad- drugstore own- ministration. er: "This seems to be a distinct This measure carries an 8% danger. The pay boost for postal workers, and middle class is provides for a nine-member board being hit hard- to run a postal authority, with a est by the in- separate commission to fix rates creasing costs of a college edu- subject to the Postmaster Gen- cation. The rich eral's veto. can absorb the POSTAL All this sounds promising, and higher costs, a revamped postal system may be while the poor are subsidized. The REFORM middle class should be equally en- operational before too long. titled to a subsidy." It is much to be hoped, Sen. Gale McGee though, in our opinion, that Con- Floyd P Pettiford, Piscataway, (D-Wyo.) gress will find the courage to rule J., concert promoter: "If compulsory unionism out of any new postal setup. Many these admission labor leaders are hot for the union shop form of semi- fficers fear slavery to be riveted on the postal workers, as a step toward that this is trend, there similarly serii-enslaving most if not all civil servants. must be some The scheme, we are convinced, should be nipped in the solid reasons for bud, and, to repeat, we devoutly hope Congress will find it. Personally, I the nerve to do the nipping. think that every- one who ca n qualify for col- MORE ON FOULED-UP STREETS lege, Ivy League or not, should go and the government should VOICE OF THE PEOPLE The city's streets on average are filthier than ever be- pay the cost." fore. Sanitation union boss J J DeLury says SO. Please give name and address with letter. We will withhold both on request. There is talk-plenty of it-that Mr DeLury's men Mrs. Helen Kantrowitz, Bronx, secretary: "It's THE CAMBODIAN AFFAIR DEFINITIONS could markedly increase their productivity without hurting happening, and Brooklyn: Many in this country Manhattan: Sen. Javits, for- their health or their equipment. not only in the would have us pull out of South- Ivy -League lornly trying to remain contem- However, it is a fact, as reported in yesterday's NEWS by Daniel O'Grady and Martin McLaughlin, that bureau- schools The east Asia now. They would porary, has borrowed from the middle class is snuggle under the security of the radical left argot and charged the Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON / March 26 - 3.45 p.m. PAUL CARLIN CALLED TO REPORT Negotiators will go back in at 4:00 p.m. Senate Conferees on H.R. 13000 adopted motion for retroactive pay that it should not be later than January 1, 1970. 1. Recommendations will be made when (either or) 1. President submits statement based on negotiations or 2. Parties (government and postal unions) announce that they have reached an impasse. House conferees - issued a statement of regret on possibility that House democrats may discharge conferees - that is then giving them option on Floor to accept amendment. Can't do anything til Monday. No roll call votes without 48 hour notice. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library April 21, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR BILL GIFFORD Special Assistant for Legislative Affairs Department of Labor Bill Timmons would appreciate having your comments on the attached correspondence relating to the applicability of Section 14 B of the Taft Hartley Act to postal reorganization legislation. Thank you. William E. Casselman, II Deputy Special Assistant to the President bcc: Bill Timmons Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library April 21, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR PAUL CARLIN Executive Assistant to Postmaster General Post Office Department Bill Timmons would appreciate having your comments on the attached corrspondence relating to the applica- bility of Section 14 B of the Taft Hartley Act to postal reorganization legislation. Thank you. William E. Casselman, II Deputy Special Assistant to the President bcc: Bill Timmons Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library April 21, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR JOHN DEAN Associate Deputy Attorney General for Legislation Department of Justice Bill Timmons would appreciate having your comments on the attached correspondence relating to the applicability of Section 14 B of the Taft Hartley Act to postal reorganization legislation. Thank you. William B. Casselman, II Deputy Special Assistant to the President bcc: Bill Timmons Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library April 21, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR HENRY CASHEN From: Bill Casselman Bill Timmons would appreciate having your comments on the attached correspondence relating to the applicability of Section 14 B of the Taft Hartley Act to postal reorganization legislation. Thank you. bcc: Bill Timmons Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Bill Will you quickly xuox copies to Kilcullen + Nelson exchange and shoot them to Daue carlin, Bill Gifford, John Dean and Henry Cashen for comment. This could he important !! Thank B, Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library BC/ 4/21/70 ARE you CHASING DOWN THE 14-B PROBLEM WITH POSTAL REDRGANIZATION? I HAVE TO GET BACK TO SEN. BAKER ASAP. BT Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library JENNINGS RANDOLPH, W. VA., CHAIRMAN STEPHEN M. YOUNG, OHIO JOHN SHERMAN COOPER, KY. EDMUND S. MUSKIE, MAINE J. CALEB BOGGS, DEL. B. EVERETT JORDAN, N.C. HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., TENN. BIRCH BAYH, IND. ROBERT J. DOLE, KANS. JOSEPH M. MONTOYA, N. MEX. EDWARD J. GURNEY, FLA. william B. SPONG, JR., VA. ROBERT W. PACKWOOD, OREG. THOMAS F. EAGLETON, MO. United States Senate MIKE gravel, alaska COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC works RICHARD B. ROYCE, CHIEF CLERK AND STAFF DIRECTOR J. B. HUYETT, JR., ASSISTANT CHIEF CLERK WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510 M. BARRY MEYER, COUNSEL April 20, 1970 MEMORANDUM TO. WILLIAM E. TIMMONS FROM Hugh Branson, Administrative Assistant to Senator Howard H. Baker, Jr. Please find enclosed correspondence from David A. Nelson, General Counsel, Post Office Department, and John L. Kilcullen which we discussed by phone this afternoon. Hugh Bransan Enclosure Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library THE GENERAL COUNSEL POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON, D. C. 20260 March 12, 1970 Honorable David H. Henderson Chairman, Subcommittee on Manpower and Civil Service Committee on Post Office and Civil Service House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20315 Dear Mr. Chairman: This is in response to your request for my opinion as to whether the proposed postal reform legislation contained in the Committee Print of March 6, 1970, if enacted into law, would override state right-to- work laws and authorize the Postal Service Authority to enter into union shop agreements applicable to postal employees in right-to-work states. In my view the postal reform legislation would not authorize the Postal Service Authority to enter into or attempt to enforce a union shop agreement in any state having a law that prohibits the execution or application of agreements requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment. This opinion is based on the fact that section 102 of the proposed postal reform bill would add a section to title 39 of the United States Code providing, in pertinent part, that "labor-management relations shall, to the extent not inconsistent with provisions of this title, be subject to the provisions of chapter 7 of title 29." (39 U.S.C. 807, as set forth on page 60 of the Committee Print.) Chapter 7 of title 29 contains a provision - originally enacted as Section 14(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947 - stating that: "Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as authorizing the execution or application of agreements requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment in any State or Territory in which such execution or application is prohibited by State or Territorial law." (29 U.S.C. 164(b)) The subchapter in question affirmatively provides that it shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer "by discrimination in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment to encourage or discourage membership in any labor organization." 29 U.S.C. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library 158(a)(3). A subsequent proviso in Section 158(a)(3) states that an employer shall not be precluded from making an agreement with a recognized collective bargaining representative requiring union membership as a con- dition of employment after the 30th day from the beginning of such em- ployment; but, as indicated above, section 14(b) has the effect of making this proviso inapplicable in those states that have adopted laws prohibiting the execution or application of agreements requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment. See Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn, 375 U.S. 96, 103 (1963), where the United States Supreme Court, in discussing the status of state right-to-work laws in the light of 29 U.S.C. 158(a)(3) and 29 U.S.C. 164(b), stated: "There is thus a conflict between State and Federal law; but it is a conflict sanctioned by Congress with directions to give the right of way to State laws barring the execution and enforce- ment of union-security agreements." From a constitutional standpoint, there is no reason why Congress, by duly enacted statute, may not "give the right of way" to state right- to-work laws insofar as employees of a Federal instrumentality are con- cerned, whether such employees work in an enclave over which the United States has exclusive legislative jurisdiction or whether they-work in an area over which the state government has jurisdiction. In my opinion, this is precisely what Congress would do if it enacted a postal reform bill containing the provisions set forth in the Committee Print of March 6; nowhere in the Committee Print is there any provision that is inconsistent with a Congressional intent to defer to state right-to-work laws across the board. I am aware of the fact that the National Right to Work Committee has suggested, a least by innuendo, that the provisions of state right-to-work laws might not apply to postal employees, under the kind of legislation now being considered, to the extent that such employees may work on Federal reservations. The Committee has referred, in this connection, to the fact that certain attorneys employed by the Department of Defense are said to be insisting that state right-to-work laws do not apply to private employees working on Federal enclaves, and the position of the Department of Defense on this question is claimed to be at variance with the position that Post- master General Blount enunciated when he testified on postal reform before the House Post Office and Civil Service Committee last summer. I see no inconsistency at all between the position taken by the Post- master General and that said to have been adopted by the Department of Defense, and I strongly disagree with the suggestion that there is even a remote possibility that the proposed postal reform legislation might make a nullity of state right-to-work laws. By incorporating the Labor Manage- ment Relations Act of 1947, the postal reform legislation would adopt a policy of deference to state law on the right-to-work issue, in those states 2 Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library having right-to-work laws, thus putting the Postal Service Authority in exactly the same position, with regard to the union shop, that it would occupy were it a private business enterprise. The power of Congress to adopt such an approach is clear, and its intent to do so, as expressed in the postal reform measure, seems to me to be equally clear. I am not aware of any comparable statute applicable to Defense Department contractors working on Federal enclaves, and the reference to the Department of Defense situation seems to me to be wholly inappo- site. I trust that the foregoing adequately covers the question in which you expressed an interest. Sincerely, David a. Milson David A. Nelson General Counsel 3 Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Law Offices of Gall, Lane, Powell and Kilcullen 1250 Connecticut Avenue JEROME POWELL JOHN C. GALL (1941-1957) JOHN L. KILCULLEN ROBERT M. SCOTT Washington, DC. 20036 WILLIAM F. HOWE (1943-1963) WILLIAM H. WILLCOX JOHN F. LANE J. JAMES MCKENNA - JOHN ERIS POWELL PETER F. HEALEY COUNSEL TELEPHONE (202) 659 1600 April 3, 1970 Mr. Reed Larson National Right to Work Committee 1900 L Street, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20036 Dear Reed: By letter dated March 25, 1970 Congressman David N. Henderson forwarded to you a copy of a letter from David A. Nelson, General Counsel of the Post Office Department, setting forth the reasons why, in Mr. Nelson's opinion, the proposed postal reform legislation would not permit the Postal Service Authority to enforce compulsory union shop agreements in Right to Work states. Mr. Nelson's letter argues that the proposed postal reform bill, by providing that labor-management relations of the Postal Authority shall be subject to the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, automatically incor- porates section 14 (b) of that Act SO as to preclude enforcement of compulsory unionism agreements in the nineteen Right to Work states. An important point overlooked by Mr. Nelson is that some state Right to Work laws by their very terms are inap- plicable to public employees, either state or federal. For example, the Georgia Right to Work law (54-901 Code of Ga. An- notated) contains the following definition of employer: "(a) The Term 'Employer' includes any person acting in the interest of an employer, directly or indirectly, but shall not include the United States, or any State, or any political subdivi- sion thereof, or any person subject to the Rail- way Labor Act, as amended from time to time, or any labor organization (other than when acting Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Gall, Lane, Powell and Kilculten Mr. Reed Larson -2- April 3, 1970 as an employer), or any one acting in the capa- city of officer or agent or agent of such labor organization. = It is quite clear that if the Georgia Right to Work law by its terms does not apply to federal employees it would not apply to employees of the Postal Service Authority, and the Authority could proceed under the proposed law to enforce a compulsory unionism agreement in the state of Georgia notwithstanding the fact that it is a Right to Work state. A similar conclusion could be reached under the language of other state Right to Work laws including the North Carolina Right to Work law, which, al- though it does not contain the specific exclusionary language of the Georgia law, uses the term "employer" in a manner that could be construed as applying only to private employers and not governmental agencies. In dealing with the even more critical question of whether state Right to Work laws would have applicability on federally owned Post Office properties over which the United States exercises exclusive jurisdiction, Mr. Nelson argues that the proposed bill would permit the application of such laws re- gardless of whether postal employees work in an enclave over which the United States has exclusive legislative jurisdiction or whether they work in an area over which the state government has jurisdiction. "In my opinion, Mr. Nelson states, "this is precisely what Congress would do if it enacted a postal reform bill containing the provisions set forth in the Committee Print of March 6; nowhere in the Committee Print is there any provi- sion that is inconsistent with a Congressional intent to defer to state right-to-work laws across the board.' In this connec- tion Mr. Nelson takes note of the position expressed by Depart- ment of Defense attorneys that state Right to Work laws do not apply to private employees working on federal enclaves, but goes on to state "I see no inconsistency at all between the position taken by the Postmaster General and that said to have been a- dopted by the Department of Defense.' Mr. Nelson's argument on this point is that by incorporating the Taft Hartley Act the postal reform legislation would have the effect of "putting the Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Gall, Lane, Powell and Kilcullen Mr. Reed Larson -3- April 3, 1970 Postal Service Authority in exactly the same position, with regard to the union shop, that it would occupy were it a pri- vate business enterprise." The assumptions on' which Mr. Nelson's arguments are based are completely inconsistent with established law and court decisions interpreting applicable constitutional provi- sions. The federal enclave question is a much more complex problem than he makes it out to be, and a close reading of the proposed postal legislation shows nothing to indicate a Con- gressional intention to waive the federal government's exclu- sive legislative jurisdiction over Post Office properties in Right to Work states. Such a result does not flow, as Mr. Nelson assumes it would, from the provision that labor-manage- ment relations shall be subject to the Taft Hartley Act. The United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8, clause 17) grants Congress the right to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over property it purchases within a state if con- sent is given by the legislature of the state. Most if not all states have enacted statutes expressly consenting to assumption of exclusive federal jurisdiction over federally-owned proper- ties, with the result that post office properties are with few, if any, exceptions, exclusive federal enclaves. Under control- ling judicial decisions state civil law is applicable to a fed- eral enclave only if such law was in effect at the time the fed- eral government acquired exclusive jurisdiction over the enclave. This was clearly spelled out by the Supreme Court in James Stewart Co. V. Sadrukula, 309 U.S. 94 (1940), a case which in- volved the precise question of whether the requirements of a state safety law were applicable to a post office building being constructed in New York City. Since state Right to Work laws are a fairly recent development (the earliest having been en- acted in 1944) it is a safe assumption that they were not in ef- fect prior to acquisition of most of the federal properties on which Post Offices are now situated, and would therefore not apply to such properties under the rule of the James Stewart case. A similar line of reasoning has been followed by Army attorneys in concluding that state Right to Work laws have no applicability on military reservations acquired prior to adoption of such laws. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Gall, Lane, Powell and Kilcullen Mr. Reed Larson -4- April 3, 1970 Mr. Nelson apparently feels, however, that the postal reform bill shows a Congressional purpose and intent to retro- cede exclusive federal jurisdiction on post office properties in favor of state Right to Work laws. He says that the language of the bill "gives the right of way" to such laws "insofar as employees of a federal instrumentality are concerned." This, however, does not appear to be the case. It is an established rule that retrocession of exclusive federal jurisdiction can be accomplished only by an express and explicit Congressional re- linquishment, divesture of the government's proprietary interest in the property, or the occurrence of the conditions specified in the state cession statute for reversion of jurisdiction to the state. See, Report of the Interdepartmental Committee for the Study of Jurisdiction over Federal areas within the States, Part II, submitted to the Attorney General June 1957, pp 83-104; Offutt Housing Company V. Sarpy County, 351 U.S. 253 (1956) ; Johnson V. Yellow Cab Co., 321 U.S. 383 (1949) ; Fort Leavenworth RR V. Lowe, 114 U.S. 525 (1885). It would thus appear that a mere statement in the postal reform bill that labor-management relations of the Postal Service Authority will be subject to the Taft Hartley Act is not such an explicit act of renunciation of exclusive federal jurisdiction as to bring about the result Mr. Nelson suggests. Mr. Nelson's argument that the proposed law has the effect of "putting the Postal Service Authority in exactly the same position with regard to the union shop that it would occupy were it a private business enterprise, is no answer at all to the federal enclave problem. Although private employers are now subject to Taft Hartley, and to the 14 (b) provisions of Taft Hartley, their employees are nonetheless within exclusive fed- eral jurisdiction when they are engaged on a federal reserva- tion, and state civil statutes enacted prior to the time the federal property was acquired are inapplicable. On the basis of the above considerations it is my opinior. that there is a serious doubt that state Right to Work laws would have any applicability at all to postal service em-- ployees under the proposed legislation. It can be predicted Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Gall, Lane, Powell and Kilcullen Mr. Reed Larson . -5- April 3, 1970 with absolute certitude that in the event the proposed bill is enacted into law the postal unions will take this position and will insist that there was no expressed intent in the legisla- tion to relinquish exclusive federal jurisdiction over postal enclaves in the Right to Work' states. In the absence of any more precise language than that now contained in the proposed bill the courts would undoubtedly sustain their position. Very truly yours, IS John h. Kelaullum John L. Kilcullen JLK: jd Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 25, 1970 POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT REPORT Senate P.O. C&S Committee met in Executive Session today to discuss postal reform legislation. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 26, 1970 POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT REPORT 1. The Senate P.O. & C.S. committee today favorably reported S. 3842 i postal reform bill. Senator Yarborough reserved the right to file a minority report. 2. On May 25, Senators RAndolph and Boggs joined as cosponsors of S. 3842. 3. The Postmaster General today presented testimony before the Senate Postal Appropriations Subcommittee on Post Office Department budget for FY 71. 4. House Subcommittee on Postal Rates continued hearings on postal rate increase legislation. The testimony was generally in opposition to the proposed rate increases. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON PAUL CARLIN CALLED 12 50 pm 5/26/70 The Postal Reform Bill was reported out of the Senate PO &CS Committe today. The transportation aspect is the only bad feature, thinks we can live with the rest of the bill Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON April 20 - 4:00 p.m. POST OFFICE DEAPRTMENT REPORT 1. Senator Gale McGee (D-Wyo) sharply criticized the Administration for attempting to dictate to Congress the terms of postal reorganization legislation. He contended that it takes no postal corporation to get effective labor management by law, overdue pay or compression from 21 years to 8 years for advancement (in-grade). 2. On Tuesday, April 21, the Postmaster Genearl and the Assistant Postmaster General for Finance and Administration will testify before the House P.O. & C.S. on postal rates on proposed postal rates changes. 3. On Wednesday, April 22, the Postmaster General will testify before the House P.O. & C.S. On H.R. 17070, the postal reorganization and salary adjustment act of 1970. The Committee April 23. will continue its open hearings on postal reform on Thursday Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library To: Bill Timmons For your information, Senator Geldwater speak S on postal what? you're BC monitory stuff POD Right? From- Hugh Newton Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library Barry Goldwater Compulsory Unionization MAY Sought By George Meany A legislative device which cluded provision for postal might eventually pave the way reform as well as provision for for compulsory unionization of an 8 percent raise in the pay of some 12 million government postal workers. employees federal, state and It now becomes clear that the local is tied up in the strong compulsory union feature was drive for postal reform. the major goal of the AFL-CIO. Although little attention has Meany's testimony before the been drawn to the fact, four House Post Office and Civil bills sent to Congress with the Service Committee made this endorsement of Postmaster absolutely clear. General Winton Blount contain The AFL-CIO president authority for the compulsory declared that he would oppose unionism of 750,000 postal the measure if an amendment workers. If the concept is was inserted in the legislative enacted by Congress, the action program to maintain the right could serve as a precedent for to work for postal workers. extending the compulsion to all The amendment in question government workers. was offered by Rep. David The bills are deceiving. All of Henderson of North Carolina. It them contain long needed would not alter any part of the provisions for reforming our bill except to protect a worker's postal system, the bulk of which right to join or not to join a enjoy the support of most con- union. In effect, Meany told the gressmen and a majority of committee that he would reject taxpayers. an 8 percent raise in pay for There is no intention here to postal workers, improved contest the great need for pension benefits and a reduction changes in the present system, in the number of years where postal rates keep rising, necessary to attain maximum DANVILLE postal deficits keep increasing pay scale should the Henderson and postal service continues to (VA.) amendment be adopted. decline. A question arises as to REGISTER But the need for these whether Meany is saying that reforms does not justify the he isn't as concerned about im- cancellation of rights presently proving the working conditions May 17, 1970 enjoyed by postal employees. of the union's present mem- The law gives them the specific bership as he is about extending right to join a union if they that membership by force of want to; it also gives them the law. right not to join a union if this It should not be overlooked is their choice. that Meany has said the This basic right to work for significance of his agreement government employees has been with the Post Office Depart- upheld by both the late Presi- ment "will not be lost on people dent John Kennedy and Presi- whose job it is to deal with dent Richard Nixon in executive public employees on the state orders. In addition, the 1968 and local level." Republicanplatform This is, of course, an open specifically gave GOP support suggestion that union leaders in to the right of free choice for states and municipalities strive individual federal workers. to duplicate the compulsory The pertinent wording in that membership feature of the platform reads: "Further, we postal reform agreement if pledge to protect federal Congress is foolish enough to employees in the exercise of enact Meany's pet provision. their right freely and without fear of penalty or reprisal to form, join or assist any employee organization or to refrain from any such ac- tivities." Regardless, the postmaster general has incorporated language in his reform measures that would authorize the abolition of the right of free choice by the postal workers. This, apparently, was the major objective behind the agreement which the Post Of- fice Department reached with AFL-CIO President George Meany At the time of the partial strike of postal workers. Meany and the unions agreed to a package program which in- Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library