Ask the Scholar
Page 49 of 62
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
9
Mary McGrory notes the whispering that Connally
isn't happy in his work. Considering the awe
and respect in which he's held at the WH, this
seems surprising. One Texas MC says the Secy.
doesn't believe the economy will be righted by
fall and "he doesn't wish to be around to bare
his breast to the hailstones. 11 RN's comments
on the VP on Rather's show were apparent by the
start of Connally's restlessness. The Secy. 's
hopes to be a GOP Pres are over -- he hopes the
Dems will take him in '76. As does Kraft,
McGrory also suggests the Secy. may be interested
in State.
ECONOMY
All nets noted the WH has confirmed it is considering
VAT to raise $16B to replace educational funds
now raised by property taxes.
That's "by no
means a final decision, 11 said Ziegler who said
the consideration of a program about which RN
has "a positive attitude" is not inconsistent with
Connally's statements on no new taxes
Shultz said there is "no draft of legislation or
proposals for a major new tax" for FY '73.
Sen. Jackson called VAT "absurd.
a sales tax
in disguise" and said the govt. should instead
raise monies by closing tax loopholes so millionaires
would pay at least a minimum tax.
Connally said it's a "whole lot easier to criticize"
a $50B increase in the debt limit than "justify it".
He also said "we still have wage and price controls
because there is no acceptable alternative" but
declined to speculate how long they'd last.
Sen. Ellender challenged the Admin. to use actual
figures in discussing FY '73 proposals rather
than what he called misleading figures. He said
"the true deficit is $36.2B, 11 but Shultz maintained
the unified budget concept adopted in '69 represents
most accurately the full impact of the Govt. on
the economy.
CEA's Solomon defended the
budget as noninflationary and said higher taxes
could depress the economy, causing a larger deficit than
anticipated, but the possibility still increased that
Page data
- Page
- 49
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 9d81fde9b36bd6f5
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 574771321
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "574771321",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574771321",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "[Feb. 1-7, 1972] [1 of 2]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574771321",
"collections": [
"White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
"President's Office Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/033/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/033/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/033/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 62,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "574771321",
"label": "[Feb. 1-7, 1972] [1 of 2]",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574771321"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "574771321",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574771321",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "[Feb. 1-7, 1972] [1 of 2]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574771321",
"collections": [
"White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
"President's Office Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/033/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/033/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/033/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 62,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574771321",
"naId": 574771321,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 49,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/033/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-033-12-049.jpg",
"mediaId": "9d81fde9b36bd6f5",
"ocrText": "9\nMary McGrory notes the whispering that Connally\nisn't happy in his work. Considering the awe\nand respect in which he's held at the WH, this\nseems surprising. One Texas MC says the Secy.\ndoesn't believe the economy will be righted by\nfall and \"he doesn't wish to be around to bare\nhis breast to the hailstones. 11 RN's comments\non the VP on Rather's show were apparent by the\nstart of Connally's restlessness. The Secy. 's\nhopes to be a GOP Pres are over -- he hopes the\nDems will take him in '76. As does Kraft,\nMcGrory also suggests the Secy. may be interested\nin State.\nECONOMY\nAll nets noted the WH has confirmed it is considering\nVAT to raise $16B to replace educational funds\nnow raised by property taxes.\nThat's \"by no\nmeans a final decision, 11 said Ziegler who said\nthe consideration of a program about which RN\nhas \"a positive attitude\" is not inconsistent with\nConnally's statements on no new taxes\nShultz said there is \"no draft of legislation or\nproposals for a major new tax\" for FY '73.\nSen. Jackson called VAT \"absurd.\na sales tax\nin disguise\" and said the govt. should instead\nraise monies by closing tax loopholes so millionaires\nwould pay at least a minimum tax.\nConnally said it's a \"whole lot easier to criticize\"\na $50B increase in the debt limit than \"justify it\".\nHe also said \"we still have wage and price controls\nbecause there is no acceptable alternative\" but\ndeclined to speculate how long they'd last.\nSen. Ellender challenged the Admin. to use actual\nfigures in discussing FY '73 proposals rather\nthan what he called misleading figures. He said\n\"the true deficit is $36.2B, 11 but Shultz maintained\nthe unified budget concept adopted in '69 represents\nmost accurately the full impact of the Govt. on\nthe economy.\nCEA's Solomon defended the\nbudget as noninflationary and said higher taxes\ncould depress the economy, causing a larger deficit than\nanticipated, but the possibility still increased that"
}