Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 41
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

2 w/ on ad hoc basis -- possibly thru revision in formula for depletion, " Trib notes. If this is what new team has in mind, sooner it's made clear, "the more effective it'll be. 11 To degree Love-Simon change means "we may not get rationing after all, 11 WS Journal says "changing of the czars is welcome. 11 Energy policy has "floundered" because of "its preoccupation w/ political rather than economic solutions. Too many of RN's advisers, including Love, have addressed problem in terms of what they con- sider to be politically feasible. 11 Further, it notes, reason why so many MCs are "clamoring for rationing" is "transparent" -- "disasters" that followed "would be blamed on Admin. bungling. Does anyone doubt Proxmire, who now demands rationing, would next year call inquiry into its failures 11 Journal asserts that "what terrifies the Loves and Lairds is that public won't only be furious at higher and higher prices but will also be outraged if classic market solution causes profits to soar. 11 Yet, "no other measure short of sending Marines to Persian Gulf could increase supply to meet short-term problem. 11 Noting FTC reported "after-tax oil profits in ratio to stockholders' equity was 10. 7% in 2nd Q as compared to 14. 0% for all manufacturing, 11 Journal points out, "if it's more profitable for business to get into widgets [or] electric toothbrushes than to develop shale oil [etc] by '80, US will be self sufficient in widgets [and] electric toothbrushes. 11 Also higher profits wouldn't leave "oil cos. fat, happy and secure. They'd not only be forced to race each other to protect lucrative market shares come '80. They'd also inevitably have to contend w/ those industries now grinding out widgets and suddenly see a potential for energy profits that induces them to diversify. 11 Journal suggests "obvious political bone to throw Hill" would be to 'eliminate oil-depletion allowance. 11 "As the dimensions of the shortage come into full view, 11 says New Republic, "it becomes clearer every day that rationing is the answer. Large price or tax increases won't assure that needed fuel will get to those who must have it. 11 Brinkley thinks rationing's ahead despite RN's opposition. David feels Admin. will create smallest possible burocracy. Most likely program will be run thru state motor vehicle depts. He predicts M-E oil will be back, possibly in just a few months. The price: complete or near-complete Israeli w/drawal from occupied territories. He also thinks M-E settlement will include a new nation for Palestinian refugees. Jeff Hart asks why shouldn't Arabs, if they want their land back, be required to guarantee Israeli borders. He thinks Faisal would buy that and if

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
f19097495b2c84b2
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
574789278
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "574789278",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574789278",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "News Summaries - December 1973 [3 of 16]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574789278",
    "collections": [
        "White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "President's Office Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/064/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/064/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/064/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 41,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "574789278",
    "label": "News Summaries - December 1973 [3 of 16]",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574789278"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "574789278",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574789278",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "News Summaries - December 1973 [3 of 16]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574789278",
    "collections": [
        "White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "President's Office Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/064/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/064/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/064/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 41,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574789278",
    "naId": 574789278,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/064/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-064-03-002.jpg",
    "mediaId": "f19097495b2c84b2",
    "ocrText": "2\nw/ on ad hoc basis -- possibly thru revision in formula for depletion, \"\nTrib notes. If this is what new team has in mind, sooner it's made\nclear, \"the more effective it'll be. 11\nTo degree Love-Simon change means \"we may not get rationing\nafter all, 11 WS Journal says \"changing of the czars is welcome. 11\nEnergy policy has \"floundered\" because of \"its preoccupation w/\npolitical rather than economic solutions. Too many of RN's advisers,\nincluding Love, have addressed problem in terms of what they con-\nsider to be politically feasible. 11 Further, it notes, reason why so\nmany MCs are \"clamoring for rationing\" is \"transparent\" -- \"disasters\"\nthat followed \"would be blamed on Admin. bungling.\nDoes anyone\ndoubt Proxmire, who now demands rationing, would next year call\ninquiry into its failures 11 Journal asserts that \"what terrifies\nthe Loves and Lairds is that public won't only be furious at higher and\nhigher prices but will also be outraged if classic market solution\ncauses profits to soar. 11 Yet, \"no other measure short of sending\nMarines to Persian Gulf could increase supply to meet short-term\nproblem. 11 Noting FTC reported \"after-tax oil profits in ratio to\nstockholders' equity was 10. 7% in 2nd Q as compared to 14. 0% for\nall manufacturing, 11 Journal points out, \"if it's more profitable for\nbusiness to get into widgets [or] electric toothbrushes than to develop\nshale oil [etc] by '80, US will be self sufficient in widgets [and] electric\ntoothbrushes. 11 Also higher profits wouldn't leave \"oil cos. fat, happy\nand secure. They'd not only be forced to race each other to protect\nlucrative market shares come '80. They'd also inevitably have to\ncontend w/ those industries now grinding out widgets and suddenly\nsee a potential for energy profits that induces them to diversify. 11\nJournal suggests \"obvious political bone to throw Hill\" would be to\n'eliminate oil-depletion allowance. 11\n\"As the dimensions of the shortage come into full view, 11 says\nNew Republic, \"it becomes clearer every day that rationing is the\nanswer. Large price or tax increases won't assure that needed fuel\nwill get to those who must have it. 11\nBrinkley thinks rationing's\nahead despite RN's opposition. David feels Admin. will create\nsmallest possible burocracy. Most likely program will be run thru\nstate motor vehicle depts. He predicts M-E oil will be back, possibly\nin just a few months. The price: complete or near-complete Israeli\nw/drawal from occupied territories. He also thinks M-E settlement\nwill include a new nation for Palestinian refugees.\nJeff Hart asks\nwhy shouldn't Arabs, if they want their land back, be required to\nguarantee Israeli borders. He thinks Faisal would buy that and if"
}