Ask the Scholar

Page 21 of 52
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 21

OCR

CONFIDENTIAL -2- He said government reorganization is not a vote issue nor is revenue sharing but that it is something positive and something that ought to be done. He pointed out that if we can get approval on the first department it will show we can get done some of the other things which we have offered on the domestic scene. Morton said the Department of Natural Resources also had some chance and that it would be a political issue if we chose to make it so. He also said these are vote issues in his opinion. Richardson, Morton, Romney and others talked about the importance of the Congressional structure to executive reorganization and the fea on the part of some Congressmen that we re looking for changes in Congress to parallel changes in the executive reorganization. It was the consensus of the group that this may be one of the reasons there is some opposition to executive reorganization and that there should be efforts made to assure Congress that we would deal with committees as they exist and are not looking for anyerestructuring within the legislative branch. Campbell - sitting in for Hardin - said there is agricultural resistance to giving up the Department of Agriculture inasmuch as farmers think of this as their department. On the other hand he pointed out that reorganization could "shuck off" many of the agricultural functions which farmers aren't interested in anyhow; such as food stamps and other programs. This led to a discussion of the problems of names and a questioning of whether or not the word agriculture should be included in the title of the Department of Economic Development. Shultz indicated that we are trying to get away from the constituency approach to departments. There also was some cussion of the titles of people within departments The President suggested that if the man heading up the department office dealing with farmers could be called a. director or secretary of agriculture. That might help the situation. Names aren't important. he said. "Everybody knows where the power is". The President invited cabinet members to be in touch with people on the Hill - "In fact you can say I asked you to (talk with them about reorganization)". The President was scheduled to be in the meeting 15 minutes and stayed almost 1 hour. A list of other participants is attached. DETERMINED TO BE AN ADMINISTRATIVE MARKING E.O. 12065, Section 6-102 By MH NARS, Date 1/11/80 CONFIDENTIAL

Page data

Page
21
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
158800ddea889c2c
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
574801284
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "574801284",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574801284",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Memoranda for the President--Beginning October 31, 1971",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574801284",
    "collections": [
        "White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "President's Office Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/083/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/083/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/083/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 52,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "574801284",
    "label": "Memoranda for the President--Beginning October 31, 1971",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574801284"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "574801284",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574801284",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Memoranda for the President--Beginning October 31, 1971",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574801284",
    "collections": [
        "White House Staff Member and Office Files (Nixon Administration)",
        "President's Office Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/083/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/083/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/083/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 52,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/574801284",
    "naId": 574801284,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 21,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-smof/876218/Batch0003/083/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05/37-sf-smof-pof-876218-083-05-021.jpg",
    "mediaId": "158800ddea889c2c",
    "ocrText": "CONFIDENTIAL\n-2-\nHe said government reorganization is not a vote issue nor is revenue\nsharing but that it is something positive and something that ought to be\ndone. He pointed out that if we can get approval on the first department\nit will show we can get done some of the other things which we have\noffered on the domestic scene.\nMorton said the Department of Natural Resources also had some chance\nand that it would be a political issue if we chose to make it so. He also\nsaid these are vote issues in his opinion.\nRichardson, Morton, Romney and others talked about the importance of\nthe Congressional structure to executive reorganization and the fea on\nthe part of some Congressmen that we re looking for changes in Congress\nto parallel changes in the executive reorganization. It was the consensus\nof the group that this may be one of the reasons there is some opposition\nto executive reorganization and that there should be efforts made to assure\nCongress that we would deal with committees as they exist and are not\nlooking for anyerestructuring within the legislative branch.\nCampbell - sitting in for Hardin - said there is agricultural resistance to\ngiving up the Department of Agriculture inasmuch as farmers think of this\nas their department. On the other hand he pointed out that reorganization\ncould \"shuck off\" many of the agricultural functions which farmers aren't\ninterested in anyhow; such as food stamps and other programs. This led\nto a discussion of the problems of names and a questioning of whether or\nnot the word agriculture should be included in the title of the Department\nof Economic Development. Shultz indicated that we are trying to get away\nfrom the constituency approach to departments. There also was some\ncussion of the titles of people within departments The President\nsuggested that if the man heading up the department office dealing with\nfarmers could be called a. director or secretary of agriculture. That\nmight help the situation. Names aren't important. he said. \"Everybody\nknows where the power is\". The President invited cabinet members to\nbe in touch with people on the Hill - \"In fact you can say I asked you to\n(talk with them about reorganization)\".\nThe President was scheduled to be in the meeting 15 minutes and stayed\nalmost 1 hour. A list of other participants is attached.\nDETERMINED TO BE AN\nADMINISTRATIVE MARKING\nE.O. 12065, Section 6-102\nBy\nMH\nNARS, Date 1/11/80\nCONFIDENTIAL"
}