Ask the Scholar

Page 4 of 100
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 4

OCR

- 2 - This is the feeling that one gets rom considering some of the approaches to negotiations with Mussia, particularly as those negotiations either involve "disengagement" or disarmament as the ne cessary alternative to the disaster of general nuclear war. Sometimes the dichatory is made really absolute by saying that disarmament itself is not the true object of negotiations, as the alter- native of nuclear war; it is assumed that disarmament would be useless without what is called "disengagement" and that this diseng.gement (giving up overseas bases and military alliances, necessarily defensive) is the necessary price of relaxing the so-called "tensions" with the Soviet system that are supposed to be the matrix of all our difficulties with Russia; and the dangers of war, The recent speech by Robert E. Matteson, Director of the White House Disarmament Staff, before the University of Minnesota Conference on "National Security in the Nuclear Age" (February 18, 1958) was called "The Disarmament "ilemma". In the press reports, it was, in spite of denials by Mr. Matteson and specific disclaimers in the course of the speech, treated as a swaeping attack on the policies of the Secretary of State, Mr. Dulles, in that it called for (a) relaxing of tensions, and (b) negotiations leading toward this objective through the acceptance of necessary compromises to get some initial steps toward disarment agreed upon with the Soviet authorities, It is true that one of the propositions in Mr. Matteson's closely reasoned paper night have been interpreted to lead to the last conclusion since he said in the syllogism which he presented, *(a) A disarmement agreement in the mutual interest of the US and USSR is possible primarily because both the US and the Soviet agree that the chances are that the present arms race can end only in an all-out nuclear war which neither of them wants. Reproduced at the Richard Nixon Library and Museum.

Page data

Page
4
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
8057f3f1cd43c80c
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
2713609
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "2713609",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2713609",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Elliott, William Y., Dr.",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2713609",
    "collections": [
        "Pre-Presidential Papers of Richard M. Nixon",
        "General Correspondence"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0005/2713609/2713609_Page_001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0005/2713609/2713609_Page_001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0005/2713609/2713609_Page_001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 100,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "2713609",
    "label": "Elliott, William Y., Dr.",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2713609"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "2713609",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2713609",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Elliott, William Y., Dr.",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2713609",
    "collections": [
        "Pre-Presidential Papers of Richard M. Nixon",
        "General Correspondence"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0005/2713609/2713609_Page_001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0005/2713609/2713609_Page_001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0005/2713609/2713609_Page_001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 100,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2713609",
    "naId": 2713609,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 4,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0005/2713609/2713609_Page_004.jpg",
    "mediaId": "8057f3f1cd43c80c",
    "ocrText": "- 2 -\nThis is the feeling that one gets rom considering some of the approaches\nto negotiations with Mussia, particularly as those negotiations either involve\n\"disengagement\" or disarmament as the ne cessary alternative to the disaster of\ngeneral nuclear war. Sometimes the dichatory is made really absolute by saying\nthat disarmament itself is not the true object of negotiations, as the alter-\nnative of nuclear war; it is assumed that disarmament would be useless without\nwhat is called \"disengagement\" and that this diseng.gement (giving up overseas\nbases and military alliances, necessarily defensive) is the necessary price\nof relaxing the so-called \"tensions\" with the Soviet system that are supposed\nto be the matrix of all our difficulties with Russia; and the dangers of war,\nThe recent speech by Robert E. Matteson, Director of the White House\nDisarmament Staff, before the University of Minnesota Conference on\n\"National Security in the Nuclear Age\" (February 18, 1958) was called\n\"The Disarmament \"ilemma\". In the press reports, it was, in spite of denials\nby Mr. Matteson and specific disclaimers in the course of the speech, treated\nas a swaeping attack on the policies of the Secretary of State, Mr. Dulles,\nin that it called for (a) relaxing of tensions, and (b) negotiations leading\ntoward this objective through the acceptance of necessary compromises to\nget some initial steps toward disarment agreed upon with the Soviet authorities,\nIt is true that one of the propositions in Mr. Matteson's closely\nreasoned paper night have been interpreted to lead to the last conclusion\nsince he said in the syllogism which he presented,\n*(a) A disarmement agreement in the mutual interest of the US and\nUSSR is possible primarily because both the US and the Soviet agree\nthat the chances are that the present arms race can end only in an\nall-out nuclear war which neither of them wants.\nReproduced at the Richard Nixon Library and Museum."
}