Ask the Scholar

Page 34 of 46
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 34

OCR

56 57 XXX XXXI In or about the month of February, 1947, the said loyal Bishops In or about the month of March, 1947, defendant Metropolitan duly resolved and decreed that the said resolution of secession Theophilus, together with certain bishops in league with him, pur- from the Church Abroad adopted at the Cleveland convention, as portedly deprived the said loyal Bishops of their dioceses, because well as the acts of Metropolitan Theophilus and all persons allied of their refusal to submit to the aforesaid resolutions of the Cleve- with him in seceding from the Church Abroad were contrary to land Sobor, and terminated all official relations with said loyal the laws of the Church and that said loyal Bishops therefore could Bishops, and further purportedly ordered all parishes to report no longer remain a part of the seceded faction thus created under directly to Metropolitan Theophilus and to remember his name the leadership of defendant Metropolitan Theophilus. These reso- only on appropriate occasions at divine services. Thereafter each lutions of said loyal Bishops were duly submitted to the Holy said loyal Bishop was sent a communciation by defendant Metro- Bishops' Synod and were approved by said tribunal in or about the politan Theophilus purportedly discharging him from the North month of March, 1947. The said Bishops' Synod also duly ruled American Metropolitan District. and decreed that the resolutions adopted at the said Cleveland Sobor purportedly depriving the Bishops of the right to veto de- XXXII cisions of the general assembly composed of priests and laymen and the said resolution of secession from the Church Abroad, re- On or about February 9, 1947, a parochial meeting of plaintiff ferred to in paragraph XXVIII above, were illegal and uncanonic Transfiguration Church was duly called for the purpose of elect- and were founded purely on political considerations and had no ing a Church Warden and a Church Committee. Plaintiff V. A. force or effect whatever, and further that all interdicts whatso- Lisitzen was duly elected Church Warden, and a Church Com- ever which were purportedly imposed by defendant Metropolitan mittee was duly elected composed of eight persons, five of whom Theophilus and the persons allied with him, upon members of were and now are loyal to the Church Abroad. At said meeting the clergy and laity loyal to the Church Abroad, were invalid. a motion was made for a vote disapproving the action taken by the The said Holy Bishops' Synod in said decree also appointed Arch- aforementioned Cleveland Sobor in seceding from the Church bishop Vitaly as representative of the said Synod in North Amer- Abroad and in recognizing the Moscow Patriarch as the supreme ica and vested in him the rights and duties of administration in ecclesiastical authority, but defendant Rev. Jacob Pshenichniuk all phases of the life of the Church Abroad in North America and unlawfully and in derogation of the rights of the parochial meet- also appointed Archbishop Tikhon as head of the Western Amer- ing refused to allow said motion to come to a vote. Thereafter the ican diocese of the Church Abroad, to which diocese plaintiff minutes of said meeting were submitted to defendant Metropol- Transfiguration Church belonged. At all times herein mentioned itan Theophilus who refused to approve the same. since said time, Archbishop Vitaly has been and now is the duly apponited and acting Representative of the Holy Bishops' Synod XXXIII and the Ruling Archbishop of the American and Canadian Dio- cese of the Church Abroad, and Archbishop Tikhon has been and Thereafter defendant Metropolitan Theophilus ordered and now is head of the said Western American diocese and diocesan called another parochial meeting of parishioners of Transfigura- bishop over plaintiff Transfiguration Church. tion Church, to be held on March 16, 1947, under the chairman- Said decrees were validly made by said bishops and by said ship of Rev. John Shakhovskoy. Said meeting was duly and regu- Holy Bishops' Synod. Said tribunals were and are judicial tri- larly held March 16, 1947, and was attended by 70 members of bunals of the Church Abroad and said Holy Bishops' Synod was plaintiff Church. The said Chairman first addressed the meeting then and still is the supreme judicial tribunal of the Church and urged that the parishioners pledge loyalty to defendant Metro- Abroad, the decrees and decisions of which then were and still are politan Theophilus, and further urged the parishioners to renounce binding on all parts of the Church Abroad. their allegiance to the Church Abroad and to its said governing organs. Thereupon the meeting was opened for election of Church Warden of plaintiff Church. Plaintiff V. A. Lisitzen and defend-

Page data

Page
34
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
c1d3d14c6cb0522a
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
2726332
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "2726332",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2726332",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2726332",
    "collections": [
        "Pre-Presidential Papers of Richard M. Nixon",
        "General Correspondence"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0010/2726332/2726332_Page_01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0010/2726332/2726332_Page_01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0010/2726332/2726332_Page_01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 46,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "2726332",
    "label": "Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2726332"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "2726332",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2726332",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2726332",
    "collections": [
        "Pre-Presidential Papers of Richard M. Nixon",
        "General Correspondence"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0010/2726332/2726332_Page_01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0010/2726332/2726332_Page_01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0010/2726332/2726332_Page_01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 46,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2726332",
    "naId": 2726332,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 34,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/nixon/rn-vp/595046/Batch0010/2726332/2726332_Page_34.jpg",
    "mediaId": "c1d3d14c6cb0522a",
    "ocrText": "56\n57\nXXX\nXXXI\nIn or about the month of February, 1947, the said loyal Bishops\nIn or about the month of March, 1947, defendant Metropolitan\nduly resolved and decreed that the said resolution of secession\nTheophilus, together with certain bishops in league with him, pur-\nfrom the Church Abroad adopted at the Cleveland convention, as\nportedly deprived the said loyal Bishops of their dioceses, because\nwell as the acts of Metropolitan Theophilus and all persons allied\nof their refusal to submit to the aforesaid resolutions of the Cleve-\nwith him in seceding from the Church Abroad were contrary to\nland Sobor, and terminated all official relations with said loyal\nthe laws of the Church and that said loyal Bishops therefore could\nBishops, and further purportedly ordered all parishes to report\nno longer remain a part of the seceded faction thus created under\ndirectly to Metropolitan Theophilus and to remember his name\nthe leadership of defendant Metropolitan Theophilus. These reso-\nonly on appropriate occasions at divine services. Thereafter each\nlutions of said loyal Bishops were duly submitted to the Holy\nsaid loyal Bishop was sent a communciation by defendant Metro-\nBishops' Synod and were approved by said tribunal in or about the\npolitan Theophilus purportedly discharging him from the North\nmonth of March, 1947. The said Bishops' Synod also duly ruled\nAmerican Metropolitan District.\nand decreed that the resolutions adopted at the said Cleveland\nSobor purportedly depriving the Bishops of the right to veto de-\nXXXII\ncisions of the general assembly composed of priests and laymen\nand the said resolution of secession from the Church Abroad, re-\nOn or about February 9, 1947, a parochial meeting of plaintiff\nferred to in paragraph XXVIII above, were illegal and uncanonic\nTransfiguration Church was duly called for the purpose of elect-\nand were founded purely on political considerations and had no\ning a Church Warden and a Church Committee. Plaintiff V. A.\nforce or effect whatever, and further that all interdicts whatso-\nLisitzen was duly elected Church Warden, and a Church Com-\never which were purportedly imposed by defendant Metropolitan\nmittee was duly elected composed of eight persons, five of whom\nTheophilus and the persons allied with him, upon members of\nwere and now are loyal to the Church Abroad. At said meeting\nthe clergy and laity loyal to the Church Abroad, were invalid.\na motion was made for a vote disapproving the action taken by the\nThe said Holy Bishops' Synod in said decree also appointed Arch-\naforementioned Cleveland Sobor in seceding from the Church\nbishop Vitaly as representative of the said Synod in North Amer-\nAbroad and in recognizing the Moscow Patriarch as the supreme\nica and vested in him the rights and duties of administration in\necclesiastical authority, but defendant Rev. Jacob Pshenichniuk\nall phases of the life of the Church Abroad in North America and\nunlawfully and in derogation of the rights of the parochial meet-\nalso appointed Archbishop Tikhon as head of the Western Amer-\ning refused to allow said motion to come to a vote. Thereafter the\nican diocese of the Church Abroad, to which diocese plaintiff\nminutes of said meeting were submitted to defendant Metropol-\nTransfiguration Church belonged. At all times herein mentioned\nitan Theophilus who refused to approve the same.\nsince said time, Archbishop Vitaly has been and now is the duly\napponited and acting Representative of the Holy Bishops' Synod\nXXXIII\nand the Ruling Archbishop of the American and Canadian Dio-\ncese of the Church Abroad, and Archbishop Tikhon has been and\nThereafter defendant Metropolitan Theophilus ordered and\nnow is head of the said Western American diocese and diocesan\ncalled another parochial meeting of parishioners of Transfigura-\nbishop over plaintiff Transfiguration Church.\ntion Church, to be held on March 16, 1947, under the chairman-\nSaid decrees were validly made by said bishops and by said\nship of Rev. John Shakhovskoy. Said meeting was duly and regu-\nHoly Bishops' Synod. Said tribunals were and are judicial tri-\nlarly held March 16, 1947, and was attended by 70 members of\nbunals of the Church Abroad and said Holy Bishops' Synod was\nplaintiff Church. The said Chairman first addressed the meeting\nthen and still is the supreme judicial tribunal of the Church\nand urged that the parishioners pledge loyalty to defendant Metro-\nAbroad, the decrees and decisions of which then were and still are\npolitan Theophilus, and further urged the parishioners to renounce\nbinding on all parts of the Church Abroad.\ntheir allegiance to the Church Abroad and to its said governing\norgans. Thereupon the meeting was opened for election of Church\nWarden of plaintiff Church. Plaintiff V. A. Lisitzen and defend-"
}