Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
118565252
label
1984 Campaign Advertising (4)
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
118565252
contentType
document
title
1984 Campaign Advertising (4)
identifierLocal
137
collections
Records of the White House Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (Reagan Administration)
Michael Deaver's Political Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
118565252
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1985-12-31
year
1985
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1981-01-01
year
1981
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
4eba5a956fbe0392
ocrText
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Deaver, Michael: Files Folder Title: 1984 Campaign Advertising (4) Box: 67 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name DEAVER, MICHAEL: FILES Withdrawer KDB 8/30/2011 File Folder 1984 CAMPAIGN ADVERTISING (4) FOIA F97-0066/19 Box Number 70 COHEN, D 190 DOC Doc Type Document Description No of Doc Date Restrictions NO Pages 1 NOTE RE ATTACHED LETTER 1 ND C 2 LETTER TO JERRY DELLA FEMINA 2 12/15/1980 C 3 LETTER TO JERRY DELLA FEMINA 1 1/28/1981 C 4 LETTER TO JAMES BAKER 2 3/1/1984 C Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON fill February 20, 1984 Margie: Per Mr. McManus, there will be a pre-meeting to the Della - Femina meeting in Mr. Deaver's office at 2:00 on Tuesday with: Mr. Deaver Mike McManus Jim Lake Phil Dusenberry Jerry Della Femina Donna knew about the change. I called Jim Lake's office (Roger Bolton) and told them of the change. I also notified those on the attached list I could reach about the change in time for the "large group" meeting from 2:00 to 2:30. There was no answer at Della Femina -- however, they were planning to be here at 2:00 anyway. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON February 17, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR MIKE DEAVER FROM: MARGIE CRAWFORD MOC SUBJECT: Participants in Presentation by Della Femina, Travisano & Partners, Inc. on Tuesday, February 21st at 2:00 p.m., in the Roosevelt Room The participants in the meeting stated above are as follows: From the White House: Mr. Deaver Mr. Baker Mr. McManus Mr. Darman From R/B '84: Sen. Laxalt Mr. Rollins Mr. Atwater Mr. Wirthlin Mr. Lake Mr. Nofziger Mr. Drew Lewis From Della Femina: Mr. Jerry Della Femina Mr. Jim Travis Mr. Michael Meyer Mr. Phil Dusenberry add Doug watts - Teel J. Lake could not a Hend Della Femina, Travisano & Partners JERRY DELLA FEMINA CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD February 8, 1984 Mr. Michael Deaver Assistant to the President Deputy Chief of Staff The White House Office 2:00 pm. 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. Deaver: I hope I was able to demonstrate how tremendously enthusiastic I am about the possibility of Della Femina, Travisano & Partners becoming associated with the Reagan Reelection Campaign. I feel we have a unique under- standing of what must be communicated in advertising to help assure the President's reelection. There is no other Agency in the country that will be as dedicated to the President's reelection. I would also want you to know up-front that if we were to be selected, I personally would serve as the Agency's Creative Director and as one of the copywriters on this campaign. I will write on this because, quite frankly I don't know anyone else who can bring as much energy, as much commitment, and as much passion to this task. Phil Dusenberry asked if we would submit alternative compensation proposals covering the eight months through the election with a total media and production budget of approximately $25MM. The following are compensation alternatives and the Agency's preferred compensation arrangement, with rationale: 1. Straight fee against commission. We would propose a fee of $150,000 per month through the election. This monthly fee would help defray payroll and operating expenses, especially during the initial months of the campaign when media placement would be relatively low. MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK (212)421-7180, Mr. Michael Deaver February 8, 1984 Page Two The fee would be applied against commissions earned on commissionable media and production. The commission would be the standard 15% against all media up to $15MM. Above $15MM, all media would be charged with 11% commission. Production would be charged at cost plus 10% commission, as opposed to the standard 17.65% This reduction from the standard commission for production reflects our desire to put every possible advertising dollar in media. All out-of-pocket travel expenses will be billed at cost. 2. Hourly rate plus reduced commission. All media would be charged at net plus 4% commission and production again at net plus 10% commission. Above this reduced commission, an estimated monthly fee of $300,000 would be charged at the beginning of each month through the election. This fee would be reconciled within 10 days following the month, with an invoice reflecting actual hours charged for all Agency personnel working on the campaign. The formula for preparing the chargeable hourly rate is based on salary parameters plus overhead factors for each of these following six categories: AAA Agency Principals Jerry Della Femina, Chairman Ron Travisano, Vice Chairman Jim Travis, President Jim Weller, Co-Creative Director Alan Pando, President, West Coast Office Management Director (to be named) with overall account responsibility Account, Creative, Media and Financial Management A B C D E Senior Executives Middle Management Executives Junior Executives Secretarial/Clerical/Estimators Mr. Michael Deaver February 8, 1984 Page Three An estimated monthly breakdown of hours with the hourly rate per job classification extended to an estimate of monthly costs per classification and total Agency fee per month follows: Hours Hourly Rate Total AAA 406 $200 $ 81,200 1080 $100 $108,000 B C A D E 840 $ 75 $ 63,000 540 $ 50 $ 27,000 1690 $ 30 $ 50,700 1200 $ 15 $ 18,000 $347,900 Although Alternative 2, which reflects actual hours and covers overhead plus a reduced commission, would assure that Agency costs would be covered, we would prefer Alternative 1, with overall compensation on earned commissions against a fee. The basic reason for supporting this compensation proposal is that a national campaign makes incredible demands on the people involved and their efforts. The job has to be done, no matter what demands we make on ourselves and our people. No one at the Agency or the Client (in this case, the Reelection Committee) should ever be concerned with the Agency's commitment in time. Let me again express my deep-felt conviction that President Reagan must be reelected, and that Della Femina, Travisano & Partners can add valuable assistance in assuring that it happens. Yours sincerely Jerry Della Femina Chairman of the Board JDF/mwc THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON February 16, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR DONNA BLUME/GAIL LUDWIG FROM: MARGIE CRAWFORD noe SUBJECT: Meetings Set-Up for the Week of February 20th The following are meetings I have set-up for next week which are on Mr. Deaver's schedule: Tuesday, February 21st 11:00am Mtg w/Deaver, McManus, Kimmitt, Darman Deaver's Off. re: Presidential Speeches (30 Minutes) 30 -mta 2:00pm Presentation by Della Femina, Travisano & Partners Inc. Participants: White House: Mr. Deaver Roosevelt Rm Mr. Baker Mr. McManus Mr. Darman R/B: Mr. Drew Lewis Sen. Laxalt Mr. Rollins Mr. Atwater Mr. Wirthlin Mr. Lake Mr. Nofziger Della Femina: Jerry Della Femina Jim Travis Michael Meyer (30 minutes) I have the Roosevelt Room for 60 minutes but -I expect the meeting to only go 30 minutes. CC: Mike McManus Della Femina, Travisano & Partners Inc. the here JERRY DELLA FEMINA CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD February 28, 1984 Mr. Michael A. McManus Jr. Assistant to the President The White House Office 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20500 Dear Michael: Attached are three of the letters we discussed, written by the following people: 1. Mr. David Dolgenos Marshall, Bratter, Greene, Allison & Tucker 2. Mr. Mort Persky, Editor OUI MAGAZINE 3. Mr. Donald E. Creamer, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Creamer Advertising Yours sincerely ENCS. 625 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK (212)421-7180, 428985 WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name Withdrawer DEAVER, MICHAEL: FILES KDB 8/30/2011 File Folder FOIA 1984 CAMPAIGN ADVERTISING (4) F97-0066/19 COHEN, D Box Number 70 190 DOC Document Type No of Doc Date Restric- NO Document Description pages tions 1 NOTE 1 ND C RE ATTACHED LETTER Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift. WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name Withdrawer DEAVER, MICHAEL: FILES KDB 8/30/2011 File Folder FOIA 1984 CAMPAIGN ADVERTISING (4) F97-0066/19 COHEN, D Box Number 70 190 DOC Document Type No of Doc Date Restric- NO Document Description pages tions 2 LETTER 2 12/15/1980 C TO JERRY DELLA FEMINA Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift. Della Femina, Travisano & Partners Inc. This letter from the editor of OUI MAGAZINE was in response to a letter sent to him by Saul Waring, President of Waring & LaRosa Advertising. In his letter, Mr. Waring condemned the article and the way in which the introduction depicted advertising and the advertising industry. Mr. Waring is one of the most respected mem- bers of the advertising profession, and an officer in the American Association of Advertising Agencies. 625MADISONAVENUE,NEWYORK,NEWYORK1OO2,212)42F718QTELEX428985 January 7, 1981. Mr. Saul Waring Waring & LaRosa, Inc. 555 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 Dear Mr. Waring: I just received my copy of your letter to Derick Daniels. It reminds me that someone once characterized the press as a playful bear who slaps you on the back and sends you reeling three blocks down the street. That appears to be the effect we've achieved here, to no positive purpose whatsoever. I don't think there were any bad intentions at work, just a lot of carelessness and naivete leading to the same bad results. When I was in New York two weeks ago, Henry Marks asked me to come into his office and then read to me -- with feeling, as only Henry can do -- the lead-in to the Della Femina article. Henry managed to communicate a sense of outrage at least as strong as yours, maybe stronger. Let me explain that I'm the new editor of OUI, that when I got here last September the issue in question was on the assembly line. I may be innocent of originating the piece, but I can't absolve myself, or any of us, from guilt in letting that introduction break into print. It's the sort of thing that should never have been written, but most certainly never should have reached the printed page. It should have been caught by any one of several different staff members. That it wasn't caught testifies to the age of our staff (very young, to match the age of our readers). Along with youth, alas, goes a sometimes dismaying tendency to criticize institutions and overlook interests that can't be ignored. The words themselves, though, were written by a freelance interviewer. I think it's fair to say that they were written for cleverness and effect with little or no regard for who got hurt in the process. The results of all this are much more villainous than the intentions. But a man who's been sent reeling down the street by a bear's backslap may not care much about that. 2 oui MAGAZINE 8560 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90069, 213/652-7870 page two Anyway, we don't think it's "our right" to publish material of this kind, and we're not in business to make our friends feel "embarrassed and betrayed". If we were going to invoke our "rights" it ought to be in the name of responsible journalism -- which this is not. I wouldn't expect anything like this to happen again: but if anything remotely resembling it found its way into print, I would expect you to hold me directly accountable. Alas, all I can do now is apologize for all of us. With all good wishes, and I hope you will want to sit down and chat one of these days. Sincerely Mort Persky Editor OUI MAGAZINE 3560 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90069, 213/652-7870 DellaFemina,Travisano &PartnersInc. This is a letter that I received from Donald Creamer, Chairman of Creamer Advertising, in response to a note I sent him regarding the article. 625 MADISON AVENI JE NEW YORK NEWYORK 10022,(212)421-7180, 428985 WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name Withdrawer DEAVER, MICHAEL: FILES KDB 8/30/2011 File Folder FOIA 1984 CAMPAIGN ADVERTISING (4) F97-0066/19 COHEN, D Box Number 70 190 DOC Document Type No of Doc Date Restric- NO Document Description pages tions 3 LETTER 1 1/28/1981 C TO JERRY DELLA FEMINA Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift. Della Femina, Travisano & Partners Inc. JERRY DELLA FEMINA CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD February 28, 1984 Mr. Michael A. McManus, Jr. Assistant to the President The White House Office 1600 Pennslyvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20500 Dear Michael: The attached is my statement regarding the article which appeared in the January 1, 1981 issue of OUI MAGAZINE. I am sorry this has held up the very important advertising work that must be done to ensure the reelection of President Reagan. Lets get to work. Yours sincerely, Jerry Della Femina Chairman 625 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022, (212)421-7180, TEI EX 428985 The so called "interview" in the January 1, 1981 issue of OUI MAGAZINE is filled with falsehoods and misstate- ments. If it were even remotely accurate, Della Femina, Travisano & Partners could not have become a $200 million agency that is one of the most respected in the industry. The statements attributed to me in OUI MAGAZINE are not what I believe, and are not what I advocate. It is an article that has been dismissed as a lie and a bad joke by every responsible member of the advertising and busi- ness community who has known and worked with me. Perhaps the best and certainly the final words on this article should be those of Mort Persky. He said, "The article was not responsible journalism". He also said, "It was written for cleverness and effect with little or no regard for those who got hurt in the process". Mr. Persky was the Editor of OUI MAGAZINE at the time. JERRY DELLA FEMINA February 28, 1984 Della Femina, Travisano & Partners Inc. JERRY DELLA FEMINA CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD February 27, 1984 Mr. Michael A. McManus Jr. Assistant to the President The White House Office 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20500 Dear Michael: You asked for a list of people who you or I could call on for statements in the remote possibility that this article ever crops up again. Attached is a list of names in advertising, communications, and business who would be more than happy to state that I am nothing like the person who was depicted in the article. I can give you 100 more, I may even be able to give you 1,000 more, and, if pressed (and I'm not boasting) I could probably give you 10,000 names. The fact is that anyone who has met me or known me, or heard me speak, will be happy to speak out on my behalf. Yours sincerely, Jerry Della Femina Chairman ENC. 625 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022, (212)421-7180, Robert Lipp President, Chemical Bank New York Alvin Shoemaker Chairman, First Boston Corporation Phil Dougherty Advertising columnist, The New York Times Fred Wilpon President, The New York Mets Baseball Team Nelson Doubleday Chairman, Doubleday Publishing Ed Kosner Editor in Chief, New York Magazine Michael Kramer Political columnist, New York Magazine Bill Beutel Newscaster, WABC-TV Jeff Greenfeld Newscaster, WABC-TV Jay Chiat Chairman, Chiat/Day Advertising Rev. Michael Shaser St. John's Parish, Lewisboro, New York John O'Connor Editor in Chief, Advertising Age Saul Waring President, Waring & LaRosa Advertising Marvin Sloves Chairman, Scali, McCabe & Sloves Advertising Jack Bowen Chairman, Benton & Bowles Rory Grace Chairman & Exec. Creative Director of Doyle, Dane Bernbach Advertising William Claggett Director of Advertising & Marketing, Ralston Purina Company. Phil Dusenberry Vice Chairman & Exec. Creative Director, BBDO Jack Reilly Senior Vice President, General Manager, Isuzu Motors, Inc. Joel Siegel Television Commentator, Good Morning America Mr. Derrick Daniels President Playboy Enterprises, Inc. Chicago, Illinois Dear Mr. Daniels: This is to go on record re the outrageous and irresponsible slur of the advertising profession your organization endorsed by publishing the enclosed article in "Oui" magazine. It is sad enough if your editors were so naive as to believe the characterization of the advertising industry as portrayed in this interview is representative. Or totally callous and irresponsible to publish it if they don't believe it. What price for sensationalism and promotion. What marvelous results if the Daily News picks up the story and titles it "Sex and Drugs on Madison Avenue." However, this is America. You have your rights. It may be your perrogative to publish someone's impressions or fantasies, but the publication's editorial lead-in is outrageous and unforgiving: "Madison Avenue is America's least favorite street, and it is no wonder. Advertising people work on Madison Avenue. Gray flannel minds produce sleezy campaigns: men Will Rogers never met. Hard sells. Hard tactics. Hard to take. Nightly nausea. " Jerry Della Femina has been used and made to look foolish. He has been taken in by slick charlatans to set up his friends and co-workers to public deprecation and ridicule. I feel embarrassed and betrayed to see that we recommended your publication to our clients whose advertising appears in this very issue. Sincerely, Saul Waring WAG STAROSA. ING5555 MADISON WENUE MMYORK. NAJ0022 PL5-0700 December 19, 1930 Mr. Darrick Daniels President PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INC. 919 North Micnigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60611 Dear Mr. Daniels: This is to go on record re the outrageous and irresponsible slur of the advertising profession your organization endorsed by publishing the enclosed article in Oui Magazine. It's sad enough if your aditors were SO naive as to believe the characterization of the advertising industry as portrayed in this interview is representative. Or totally callous sad irresponsible to publish it if they didn't believe it. What price for sensationalism and circulation promotion. What "marvelous" results if the Daily News picks up the story and titles it "Sex and drugs on Madison Avenue". However, this is America. You have your rights. It may 02 your prerogative to publish someone's impressions or fantasies, but the publication's editorial lead-in is outrageous and unforgivable: "Madison Avenue is America's least favorite street, and it's no wonder. Advertising people work on Madison Avenue. Gray-flannel minds producing sleazy campaigns: Men will Rogers never net. Hard sails. Hard tactics. Hard to take. Nightly nausea.' Jerry Della Femina has been used and made to look Foolish. He has been when in by slick charlatens to set up his friends and co-workers to public deprecation and rivicule. Mr. Durrick Daniels December 10, 1980 Page 2 I Feel embarrassed and betrayed (1) see that we recomended your publication to our clients whose advertising appears in this very issue. Sincerely, Saul Waring SW:55 Enclosure CC: M. Persky. Editor - Oui Magazine H. Marks, Senior Vice President - Playboy L. Mathews, American Association of Advertising Agencies M. Narva, Senior Vice President - Waring & LoRosa, Inc. Uniolas CLASSIFICATION CIRCLE ONE BELOW MODE PAGES 3 IMMEDIATE SECURE FAX # RELEASER PRIORITY NON-SECURE FAX # 13 DTG 2921202 Febs, ROUTINE TTY # FROM/LOCATION/ 1. Jerry Dolla Fomia AD Michael A. Mc Munus, Jr. TO/LOCATION/TIME OF RECEIPT 2. TOR: 2922077 Feb 84 3. 4. INFORMATION ADDEES/LOCATION/TIME OF RECEIPT 2. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/REMARKS: Unclas CLASSIFICATION WHCA FORM 8, 15 DEC 83 Della Femina, Travisano & Partners Inc. URGENT The following two-page letter should be delivered immediately to: Ms. Marge Crawford The office of: Mr. Michael A. McManus, Jr. Assistant to the President The White House Office Thank you. Jacqui Topche Assistant to JERRY DELLA FEMINA WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name Withdrawer DEAVER, MICHAEL: FILES KDB 8/30/2011 File Folder FOIA 1984 CAMPAIGN ADVERTISING (4) F97-0066/19 COHEN, D Box Number 70 190 DOC Document Type No of Doc Date Restric- NO Document Description pages tions 4 LETTER 2 3/1/1984 C TO JAMES BAKER Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] in dener's deed of gift THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Date: 2/17/84. TO: MICHAEL K. DEAVER FROM: Michael A. McManus, Jr. offor- Assistant to the President and Deputy to Deputy Chief of Staff X Information Action Let's Discuss communications by design February 16, 1984 Mr. Michael McManus Assistant to the President The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20500 Dear Mike: Following our telephone conversation of yesterday, we would like to offer a few additional thoughts. In thinking about your questions relating to audience for the PRES Project, and for the "China" and "European Summit" specials, it is clear that those of us in the cable business have accepted the "cable solution" as reality, because we have watched it occur day-by-day. For those who are not SO close to the situation, it is understandable that some convincing may be needed to the effect that "narrowcasting" is here, and viewers are accepting it nationally by the tens of millions. In order to provide you and your colleagues with some additional background on cable penetration, we are obtaining material from the cable industry regarding cable penetration levels, which we will provide as promptly as possible. You also expressed concerns that some assurance is needed that cable operators will be motivated to carry the PRES Program- ming, and that significant numbers of viewers will want to watch. These are concerns that we share completely. We have watched, with some surprise, as viewers who were formerly addicted to soap operas, are now just as hooked on daily coverage of the House of Representatives. It is our opinion that millions of viewers will be attracted to follow the PRES, on the campaign trail. Our format can make this into a view from the inside, offering viewers an unprecedented opportunity to travel with a Presidential campaign. This is the stuff of good television, and we have no doubt that a substantial audience will develop, given effective promotion. However, we do not expect an audience projection to be taken on faith, and that is why we have proposed the phased approach to the project. It seems to us that this approach reasonably well assures the identification of an audience before major funds are spent. Mr. Michael McManus February 16, 1984 Page 2 We fully understand the rationale for delaying any major decisions regarding our proposed Phase IV (PRES), until your media team is in place. However, we would still encourage you to proceed with the limited research which we have proposed and to secure prime transponders, on a tentative basis, in order to keep our options open (Phase I). Finally, we would like to offer our assistance in one or more additional areas. You mentioned that one or more media consulting groups will be making presentations next week. If you agree, I could be available to attend any or all of these presentations to help in evaluating the probable impact of the spots to be produced by these people. As you know, effective spot production is of such importance to the campaign and is such a specialized part of the television/radio business that we suggest these productions be evaluated on the basis of pro- duction values to have this additional perspective on which to base your decision. Our group does not make commercial spots per se, SO we have no competitive or vested interest in this phase of the campaign. Frequently, however, we are in a position to evaluate the talents of various agency and production groups, and to make judgments about matching particular production talents for cinematic style with specific projects or services. As you probably know, there are many talented production teams in California and New York, all of them making effective commercials at various times. The trick is to find the right group for the particular product (or candidate), and setting modesty aside, we must tell you that we feel we could be helpful here, in giving a second opinion. If you feel that this sort of informal consultation will be useful to you, I will be happy to sit in on the presentation (s), in a silent role, simply to give you my thoughts afterwards, without any obligation. Ifthat aspect of your evaluations is already adequately covered, this is fine, and we will await your call to set our next meeting. Please feel free to call me at (916) 283-4070 or 283-3102, including over the weekend. Thanks for your continuing interest. Sincerely, David E. Caldwell David E. Caldwell THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Date: 3-1-84 TO: Mike Deaver FROM: Michael A. McManus, Jr. Assistant to the President and Deputy to Deputy Chief of Staff Information Action Let's Discuss Attached is an article regarding ad agencies and those considered to be the most effective. We might want to consider one of them. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. 3/1/84 © 1984 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. MARKETING INSIDE: Esm U.S. ASSESSES Iran's threat to oil Creativity, Not Budget Size, supply, page 32. GM and Daewoo near accord to pro- duce cars, page 33. Aft Is Vital to TV-Ad Popularity GULF CANADA shares rise on take- over speculation, page 59. By Staff Reporter By JOHN KOTEN CHICAGO- Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL SHOP TALK holding company CDONALD'S CORP. SPENT a whopping $185.9 million tel- proaching cross M evising its commercials in 1983. But when viewers were Mr. Kelly, Who Gets Bonuses Esmark and asked what TV ads they liked best, more of them cited the is talking abot advertising of the No. 2 hamburger chain, Burger King nual meeting Corp., whose budget last year was less than half the size of its ri- val's, At Chrysler? "You get to chase isn't to Last year's outcome in the fast-food ad wars was one of the findings in an annual survey conducted by Video Storyboard Tests By WALL STREET JOURNAL Staff Reporters year-old chief Inc., a New York ad-testing company. During Chrysler Corp. has come up with a novel meeting and the course of the past year, it asked 20,000 variation on management bonuses: an "in- over the plant centive compensation" plan that rewards need it." adults to name the "most outstanding" TV managers for last year's profits. But with de commercial they had seen. Listed below are Retroactive incentives? Ridiculous, says self may be - the 25 most often noticed, remembered and Douglas A. Fraser, the former United Auto It has made liked. Workers president who sits on the Chrysler cial maneuve For the third straight year, the most pop- board of directors. Mr. Fraser, who says panies at a ular advertising on television was the cam- he'll vote against the plan at today's board into more of paign featuring the gags and pratfalls of celeb- meeting, believes that if workers can't get a sizing food and rities and sports figures for Miller Lite beer. chunk of last year's record earnings of builds cash Fifteen other campaigns were repeaters from $700.9 million, then managers shouldn't ei- shedding the top 25 list for 1982. ther. tractive take Among other things, the Video Storyboard findings indicate The problem is that back in the lean year In fact, the veracity of a sometimes forgotten Madison Avenue rule: The ef- of 1982, hourly workers gave up their right Mr. Kelly's fort that goes into the creation of an ad can be far more important to a share of 1983 profits in return for a to sell the than the size of the budget for putting it on the air. wage increase. Management also had no bo- Esmark nus plan; the previous plan had expired at August, and ONSIDER THE PRESENCE of British Airways on the list. the end of 1981, and the announcement of a C ward digester The airline, the only one from its industry to make the top 25, new bonus might have been a bit unseemly off all of the spent just $3.5 million to broadcast its commercials. Yet the in the midst of a government bailout. the purchase ads, with their elaborate special effects to show the landing But 1983 turned out to be a banner year, uity offering of an airborne New York City at a London airport, were among the and now management thinks there should be best-liked in 1983. "a reward for the men and women who Problems To further measure the effectiveness of ads, Video Storyboard spent five years in the trenches earning it," The Notify conducted a separate survey of 4,000 adults in which regular users of says a company spokesman. Hence the "in- ever, beenet a product were asked to cite a commercial they had seen for that centive compensation" plan, which, if ap- newly acq product category in the previous week. The number of mentions for proved by the board and the shareholders, mark's Sweet each brand was divided by its TV ad budget-estimated by Broad- would parcel out $52 million among 1,400 top ful. And cast Advertisers Reports, a measurement service-to develop a officials. As for Mr. Fraser's objection to a cosmetics measure that Video Storyboard calls "cost per 1,000 retained impres- retroactive "incentive" plan, the company gery than sions." The figure for each of the top ads is shown in the far right spokesman responds: " 'Incentive' is just Mr. column below. (Ad spending figures, however, don't include outlays an accounting term." stay long by McDonald's, Burger King and Wendy's franchises, or by Ford nies were dealers.) The Deal Maker that job meet with 1983 In the increasingly complicated battle for months 1983 1982 1983 TV COST RANK RANK BRAND (AGENCY) SPENDING* EFFICIENCY control of Gulf Oil Corp., Texas oil tycoon T. play over 1 1 Miller Lite (Backer & Spielvogel) $50.1 $30.06 Boone Pickens Jr. can call upon the exper- company' 2 5 Pepsi ( BBDO) 74.1 14.31 tise of a man who knows a thing or two Esmand 3 Stroh's (The Marschalk Co.) 19.3 31.71 about playing "Let's Make a Deal." Kelly to 4 3 Federal Express (Ally & Gargano) 22.9 20.09 Monty Hall, who hosted the long-lived pany is 5 6 Burger King (J. Walter Thompson) 82.4 26.07 television game show of that name, is a di- that is complete 6 2 Coca-Cola McCann Erickson) 40.1 9.81 rector of Far West Financial Corp., a mem- Simon's 7 4 McDonald's (Leo Burnett) 185.9 38.69 ber of the Pickens investor group that has turnaround 8 24 MCI Communications (Ally & Gargano) 26.9 10.20 raised nearly $1 billion to buy Gulf shares. car unit 9 Jell-O Young & Rubicam) 31.3 NA 10 . Diet Coke (SSC&B) 20.4 18.32 Mr. Hall says he was asked to join the board Norton Signature 11 23 Ford (J. Walter Thompson) 166.2 79.78 of the Newport Beach, Calif., company firing 170 12 21 Levi's (Foote Cone & Belding) 27.0 12.73 about four years ago with the idea that he pected to 13 7 Budweiser Light Needham Harper & Steers) 45.6 84.23 would make some television commercials for the 154.9 33.51 for its savings and loan unit. doubled Hall SVS he has been To main 14 154.9 for its savings and loan unit. 15 Calvin Klein Jeans (CRK Advertising) 5.0 8.01 By and large, Mr. Hall says, he has be 16 Wendy's (Dancer Fitzgerald Sample) 49.7 32.74 a pretty passive director. He knew abo 17 9 Atari Video Games (Doyle Dane Bernbach) 45.9 NA Far West's involvement with Gulf, but nev 18 British Airways Saatchi & Saatchi Compton) 3.5 NA thought of buying any Gulf shares. He I 19 11 Polaroid Doyle Dane Bernbach) 26.9 13.61 cently spent a month on the road doing cha 20 13 Shasta (Needham Harper & Steers) 5.7 11.01 ity telethons, and paid little attention to G 21 American Express Credit Cards Ogilvy & Mather) 20.5 NA until he returned home. Then he saw th 22 Meow Mix Della Famina Travisano) 7.6 11.88 23 12 Oscar Mayer (J. Walter Thompson) 9.2 7.56 Gulf shares-of which he had none-h gone up about 15 points, to the high 60s 24 Crest Benton & Bowles) 32.4 8.76 25 20 Kibbles n Bits (J. Walter Thompson) 6.1 26.66 "I said to myself, 'My God, look Millions this!' he recalls. "I guess that's why I not a millionaire. Or should I say billi HE MOST ACCLAIMED newcomer on the 1983 list is the aire?" T Stroh's campaign, starring Alex, the beer-lapping dog. Nine campaigns on the 1982 list didn't make last year's top 25. They are: Dr Pepper, Velveeta cheese, Tab, Life Cereal, A Sinking Asset Seven-Up, French's Mustard, Toyota, Kodak and Wonder Bread. While the entire U.S. steel industry h The ad agency with the most commercials on the 1983 list was been losing ground, nowhere has the sl J. Walter Thompson, with four. No other Madison Avenue concern page been more noticeable than at Nation had more than two. Steel Corp.'s mill in Liberty, Texas. Viewers who participated in the survey frequently commented The plant was built in 1976 on a swam that they liked humorous commercials the best. And seven of the peninsula north of Galveston. About fo campaigns listed above took a light approach. "Count me out, if it years ago, workmen discovered that 1 isn't funny," a Washington viewer told the ad research firm. ground beneath the nine-acre plant was S A ranking on the list above, of course, doesn't guarantee that a tling, fouling up the pipe-making machine campaign will move the product. Some advertising research, for in- The mill hasn't produced any steel sir 1982, but National Steel officials blame t] stance, has demonstrated that consumers often think differently on falling demand for pipe; they say that about an ad when they are polled than when they are actually shop- cavation work halted the plant's desce ping. Not so, says a customer who recently V Still, nine of the products represented in the listings above are ited the plant. "They can't fix the wh brand leaders in sales, and all of the companies whose rankings im- damn bog," he says. "I can't figure out w proved over 1982 also registered sharp gains in the marketplace. anyone would build a plant where they di "After all," says David Vadehra, president of Video Storyboard, wouldn't give them two bits for it." "it's only after gaining attention for itself that a commercial can He isn't the only one. In January, I hope to help the brand." tional Steel's parent, National Intergro Inc., abandoned a fruitless, year-long seal for a buyer and took a $56 million char Two Small Towns — One in Siberia primarily to write off its interest in plant. Now, the plant may be about to sl once more. If the Justice Department cle And Onein Montana — Are Pen Pals U.S. Steel Corp.'s purchase of National steel-making operations, the Liberty n By JOHN J. FIALKA will resurface among U.S. Steel's new agency said such contacts were approved Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL sets. and that Russian cities have exchanges go- Last November a group of people in Eu- ing with 60 cities abroad. reka, a small town in northwestern Mon- "I told them that I was talking about 1,- tana, wrote a letter to Siberia. A Lack of Bulls 000 U.S. cities," says Mr. Molander. "They "We want to get to know your people; were just bewildered at the size of the For years, Ted Halligan's semiann how they live, work and play; what they eat, thing." luncheons for Wall Street money manag read and talk about," the Eurekans wrote to Mr. Molander, who teaches at Portland have exuded the joyous optimism of an A the people of Rebrikha, an almost-as-small State University, came up with the idea two (pop. 8,000) town in central Siberia. way convention. But Mr. Halligan, a V years ago. Using a list of cities that had For good measure, the letter writers president with Piper, Jaffray & Hopw formed chapters of Ground Zero, an organi- threw in a copy of the local Tobacco Valley Inc., had a devil of a time drumming up zation concerned about nuclear weapons, he News and a postcard of nearby Lake Koo- traditional good cheer at last Friday's I worked nights in his basement matching canusa. them with Russian cities of similar size and cheon. Benefits of Friendship geographic characteristics. Then he sent out To dispel the gloom cast by the mark A few days ago they received a seven- kits giving addresses and tips on how to seven-week slump, Mr. Halligan recal page, handwritten letter signed by 33 resi- write the initial letter. Hannibal's stunning victory over a vas dents of Rebrikha. Along with a copy of Pravda and a magazine called Country One Answer superior Roman army at the battle of C nae in 216 B.C. "Didn't Hannibal finally ] Woman, they got a picture of an old lady Some U.S. cities responded with gusto. standing in front of Rebrikha's department Palo Alto, Calif., celebrated its letter to Uzh- that war?" asked a cynic in the audier gorod in the Ukraine with a parade and a Then Mr. Halligan called on a bro store. Both letters express concern about the proclamation from its mayor, but so far who he was confident would present a b dangers of nuclear war, and the Rebrikha only Eureka has received an answer. ish forecast. Instead, the broker grimly group says a friendship with Eureka might Mr. Molander isn't sure what happened vised his colleagues to forget about any "help us to save our planet before it's too to the other 999 letters, but he says he has bonuses in 1984. "This is the year we late." received indirect reports that 89 more Soviet paid our salaries-and earn them," Earl Molander, a Portland, Ore., busi- replies are under way. And some other So- said. ness professor and anti-nuclear weapons ac- viet citizens are taking an interest. "Aren't there any bulls out there?" tivist, helped arrange the exchange in an ef- Recently he received a visit from two So- viet diploma wanting to know about his or. Halligan asked in dismay. The best he CO THE WHITE HOUSE washInGTon February 14, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR GAIL LUDWIG moe FROM: MARGIE CRAWFORD The following are the participants in the 11:00am Mtg with Don Ringe and Alan Landsburg scheduled for tomorrow in the Roosevelt Room: Mr. Deaver Mr. Baker Mr. McManus Mr. Rollins Mr. Wirthlin Mr. Lake I have attached a copy of a letter from Don Ringe which might be helpful background to Mr. Deaver. RM Ringe Media, Inc. Dear Mike: Pursuant to our meeting of January 30, Ringe Media, Inc. in association with Alan Landsburg Productions, will make a presentation seeking a contract to provide creative and production services for broadcast advertising media in behalf of the Reagan-Bush '84 Re-election Campaign. We are interested as well in providing creative and production services for the Republican National Convention, including the production of a "centerpiece" documentary for use in both the convention and campaign. While I know you are aware of my credentials as a Republican media consultant, Mr. Landsburg is perhaps one of the most successful independent television producers in the country. His credits range from "The Undersea World of Jacques Cousteau" to the recently acclaimed network series on John F. Kennedy. I'd like to request that this presentation be made before Messers. Baker, Deaver, Rollins, Wirthlin, Lake and yourself, as well as any other individuals you may wish to invite. We welcome this opportunity to offer our services to the re-election effort of The President. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, RINGE MEDIA, INC. Donald S. Ringe President Mr. Michael McManus The White House Washington, D.C. February 6, 1984 DSR: jl 123 North Washington Street Boston 02114 617 720-0777