Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
66328112
label
August 1983-September 1983 Miscellaneous Incoming (7)
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
66328112
contentType
document
title
August 1983-September 1983 Miscellaneous Incoming (7)
collections
Records of the White House Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (Reagan Administration)
Michael K. Deaver's Correspondence Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
66328112
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1985-12-31
year
1985
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1981-01-01
year
1981
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
45a05a6f290b22c6
ocrText
WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name Deaver, Michael: Files Withdrawer KDB 9/9/2011 File Folder AUGUST 1983 - SEPTEMBER 1983 MISCELLANEOUS FOIA INCOMING (7) F97-066/19 Box Number 14 COHEN, D 1 ID Doc Type Document Description No of Doc Date Restrictions Pages 118273 CABLE 151935 SEP 83 (W/NOTATIONS) 1 9/15/1983 B1 118274 MEMO WILLIAM BROCK TO M. DEAVER RE 3 9/30/1983 B1 WILLIAMSBURG COMMITMENTS ON TRADE 118275 REPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMITMENTS 9 ND B1 ON TRADE FROM THE WILLIAMSBURG SUMMIT MEETING The above documents were not referred for declassification review at time of processing Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift. WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name Withdrawer Deaver, Michael: Files KDB 9/9/2011 File Folder FOIA AUGUST 1983 - SEPTEMBER 1983 MISCELLANEOUS F97-066/19 INCOMING (7) COHEN, D Box Number 14 1 ID Document Type No of Doc Date Restric- Document Description pages tions 118273 CABLE 1 9/15/1983 B1 151935 SEP 83 (W/NOTATIONS) The above documents were not referred for declassification review at time of processing Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift. re 9/36 2661 Midvale Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90064 September 23, 1983 Michael K. Deaver Deputy Chief of Staff 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. Deaver: The recent remarks of Interior Secretary James G. Watt before the U.S. Chamber of Commerce demonstrate once again the seeming contempt this man holds not only for his public office but the high moral principles of equality and justice on which our republic is founded and to which the citizenry and, I would hope, our elected and other officials aspire. Mr. Watt is an embarrassment and I sincerely hope that this latest verbal outrage will compel you to use the power of your office to seek his immediate resignation. Until this occurs, I will withhold all financial and voting support from the Republican Party. Very truly yours, Joyce K. Jones JKJ:nem Mr. Deaver's copy re c'd 9/26 John Hedstrom 814 E Illinois Wheaton IL 60187 Friday/September 23 1983 President Ronald Reagan White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: Given the old adage that "a person is known by the company he keeps", it would be in your own best self-interest (as well as in the interest of the country) to get rid of the most insensitive buffoon in your cabinet, Mr. James Watt, He has been aptly described by a Republican senator as "trash". He has succeeded in losing whatever little credibility he had left with Congress. I've read that the two main reasons that you keep this joker in your administration are: (1) he is good at squeezing campaign donations out of the far right, and (2) he deflects criticism away from you. As to the first point, he should be working for the Republican National Committee and not for the government of all the people. As to the second point, instead of deflecting criticism away from you, he is now acting like a lightning rod in attracting criticism towards you. For as long as you tolerate his atrocious behavior, it reflects very badly on yourself. You may think his apology is enough. It isn't. It's instructive that immediately following his latest slur against the minorities of this country, Mr. Watt thought it was still an appropriate joke. Only when he realized his job was in danger did he start groveling at your feet asking for forgiveness. Mr. Watt is obviously morally bankrupt. The main reason why you should ask for this joker's resignation is because he is repulsive to the vast majority of Americans. Thank you for your time. Best wishes on your work there. Sincerely, John Hedstrom John Hedstrom CC: Mr. Ed Meese, Mr. Michael Deaver CHARLES pashayan, JR. COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR 17TH DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA AFFAIRS 129 CANNON BUILDING COMMITTEE ON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 POST OFFICE AND CIVIL (202) 225-3341 SERVICE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES September 27, 1983 Mr. Michael K. Deaver Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mike: At lunch last week Ken Vetter mentioned that a member of the Traffic Safety Committee on which he serves would like to meet you sometime when she is in Washington. She is the National Committee- woman from Minnesota. She is: Ms. Evie Keegan Setup. 5501 Kellogg South Ednia, Minnesota 55424 Meeting (612) 926-9748 I am also enclosing an article from the Los Angeles TIMES Yes which may bring back memories. Sincerely yours, Lo Bill Bill Deaver CC: Mr. Ken Vetter PLEASE REPLY TO: HOME OFFICE. KINGS COUNTY HOME OFFICE TULARE COUNTY HOME OFFICE KERN COUNTY WASHINGTON OFFICE HOME OFFICE,FRESNO COUNTY 1702 EAST BULLARD AVE., SUITE 103 804 NORTH IRWIN 831 WEST CENTER STREET 201 HIGH STREET FRESNO. CALIFORNIA 93710 HANFORD. CALIFORNIA 93230 VISALIA. CALIFORNIA 93291 DELANO. CALIFORNIA 93215 (209) 487-5500 (209) 582-2896 (209) 627-2700 (805) 725-7371 MERV GRIFFIN productions file September 27, 1983 Mr. Michael Deaver Deputy Chief of Staff The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. Deaver: We greatly appreciate your valuable time spent with us. We certainly benefited from your suggestions and remarks. There are few people as close to the President as yourself and this proved very constructive in the content of the show. This unique interview presented more facets of what's really involved in being the President and I feel that our viewers, throughout America, cannot help but be impressed and touched by this fine man, as indeed were we all. With kind regards, Gina Wamrick Peter Barsocchini Georgina Warwick Producer Associate Producer "The Merv Griffin Show" "The Merv Griffin Show" 1541 north vine street hollywood, california 90028 (213) 461-4701 410 park avenue new york, new york 10022 (212) 421 4100 PRESIDENTIAL 1441L Street, N.W. Room 317 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON Washington, D.C. 20416 SMALL & MINORITY (202) 653-6851 BUSINESS OWNERSHIP. September 27, 1983 The Honorable Ronald Reagan The White House Washington, D. C. 20500 Dear Mr. President: Today marks the 23rd anniversary of my family's arrival to the United States of America. Upon our arrival to this great country, eight of us settled in an efficiency room at a motel located within a less than desirable area of Miami. I was twelve at that time, and used to the niceties of the well-to-do in preCastro's Cuba. Thanks to my parents' spirit, deep convictions and faith all of us remember those difficult times with pride, warmth and happiness. We were then able to become U.S. citizens during the early seventies. Not much longer after that, in 1974, Tommy Thomas asked me to serve as your Campaign Co-Chairman in Dade County, Florida. I went on to be one of your Delegates and partici- pated in, both, the 1976 and 1980 Republican National Conventions. On the second try at it some seven years after our initial efforts, in Detroit, we made it. It is, with these memories, that I write to you and express how honored I am to serve my country by presenting this Annual Report to you on behalf of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business Ownership. I am also able to let you know how proud our whole family is for being long term followers of such a great President. Thank you for having given me this opportunity to participate with your Administration. I shall always cherish it. Sincerely yours, Chairman 1982 Annual Report to The President of the United States and the U.S. Congress by the Presidential Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business Ownership STATES Annual Report 1982 Presidential Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business Ownership August 4, 1983 Washington, D.C. PRESIDENTIAL 1441L Street, N.W. Room 317 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON Washington, D.C. 20416 SMALL & MINORITY (202) 653-6851 BUSINESS OWNERSHIP. AL CARDENAS Chairman August 4, 1983 The Honorable Ronald Reagan The White House Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. President: On behalf of the members of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business Ownership, I am hereby respectfully submitting to you the Annual Report on the activities of the Committee during calendar year 1982, as required by Executive Order 12190. The Annual Report consists of two parts: an Executive Summary and an Appendix thereto. We wish to acknowledge the support and assistance of the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, Mr. James C. Sanders; the Associate Administrator of SBA for Minority Small Business and Capital Ownership Development, Dr. Robert Wright; their respective staffs and most importantly, those individuals from the private sector who provided valuable insight to this Committee. We especially wish to acknowledge my predecessor; Mr. Miller Hicks, who was Chairman of this Committee during a substantial part of 1982. Most of the efforts undertaken by us this past year were accomplished with his guidance and at his direction. Two Presidential Advisory Committees have been appointed. The first Committee report was issued on April 1981. Its thrust related primarily to the status of Federal procurement compliance practices. The second report contains findings and recommendations to strengthen the support functions of the public and private sector in order to better assist the small, and especially minority, business entrepreneur. Mr. President, you extended the existence of this Committee by Executive Order 12399 executed this past December 31, 1982 until September 30, 1984. We hope that the focus of this Committee's activities for the upcoming year shall be to promote subcontracting opportunities for small and minority businesses amongst private sector leaders in this country. I firmly believe this Committee can demonstrate to major corporate America that it is in its best interest to voluntarily increase the participation of small minority entrepreneurs in the sharing of our Nation's economic pie. This Committee stands eager to embark upon its mission. Respectfully yours, QR.Cand Al Cardenas Chairman 3 The Presidential Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business Ownership meeting with the President, April 30, 1982. Seated at the table, clockwise, Stanley S. Scott; R. Miller Hicks; the President; Katherine Ortega; Dr. Lincoln Ragsdale; Walter Sorg; James Sanders, Administrator, Small Business Administration; Del Green; Stephen Postupack; LeRoy Jeffries and Al Cardenas. 5 Executive Summary Table of Contents Page - Establishment of Committee 9 - Functions 13 - Introduction 13 Goals and Objectives 13 Committee Organization 13 SBA Support Service 14 Public Hearing Process 14 Ad Hoc Meetings 14 Summary Observations 15 - Calendar of Public Hearings 17 - Findings and Recommendations 19 Eliminate Discriminatory Practices 19 Improve Enforcement of Public Law 95-507 19 Increase Federal Agency MBE Procurement Goals 19 Eliminate Red Tape and Paperwork 20 Strengthen Education, Technical and Management Assistance Programs 20 Broaden SBA 8(a) Program Participation 20 Encourage Creative Capital Formation Techniques 20 Insure Prompt Payment to Subcontractors 21 Support Realistic Bonding Mechanisms 21 7 Presidential Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business Ownership Establishment of Committee Public Law 95-507 (1978), Section 7(j) 3, provided for the establishment of a Presidential Advisory Committee to increase and promote contracting and subcontracting opportunities for small and small minority-owned businesses. By Executive Order 12190 of February 1, 1980, a ten-member Presidential Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business Ownership was established in order to implement Section 7(j) (3) (A) of the Small Business Act (92 Stat. 1765, 15 U.S.C. 636 (j) (3) (A)), also known as Public Law 95-507. The ten members were to come from five major businesses and five minority small businesses. Two Presidential Advisory Committees have been appointed. The first was ap- pointed in April 1980 and terminated December 31, 1980. The second and current Committee was appointed on February 18, 1982 (eight members) and on April 30, 1982 (two additional appointees). Members Chairman (11-12-82 to date) Alberto R. Cardenas, Esq. Chairman (02-18-82 to 11-12-82) R. Miller Hicks* Member Del Green* Member William J. Greer* Member LeRoy W. Jeffries Member Katherine D. Ortega* Member Stephen Postupack Member Lincoln J. Ragsdale, Sr. Member Stanley S. Scott Member Walter L. Sorg *Resigned 9 James C. Sanders Dr. Robert Wright, Jr. Mr. Alberto R. Cardenas, Esq. Administrator Associate Administrator for Minority Small Business and Capital Ownership Development Mr. R. Miller Hicks Mr. William Jackson Greer Mr. LeRoy W. Jeffries СУД Ms. Katherine D. Ortega Dr. Lincoln Johnson Mr. Stanley S. Scott Ragsdale, Sr. Mr. Walter Larke Sorg Mr. Del Green Mr. Steven Postupack Biographical Sketches Al Cardenas is co-founder and senior partner of the law firm, Barron, Lehman, Cardenas, and Picken, P.A., in Miami, Florida. He is President and part-owner of the Coral Gables Title Company and is a principal in several commercial real estate developments in the South Florida area. He is a member of Dade County's Housing Finance Authority, a member of Florida's Governor's Advisory Council - 1982 World's Fair and was a Policy Coor- dinator to the President-Elect during the 1980-1981 presidential transition. The President appointed Mr. Cardenas as Chairman, November 12, 1982. R. Miller Hicks is President of R. Miller Hicks & Company, a business development and consultant firm incorporated over 23 years ago in Austin, Texas. He is past Chairman of the Board of Dynamic Broadcasting Corpora- tion and Vice President of Investors, Inc., a mortgage banking corporation. He is past member of the U.S. Regional Export Expansion Council. The President appointed Hicks as Chairman. William Jackson Greer is Chairman of the Board of Intex Products, Inc., of Greenville, South Carolina. In 1971, he purchased the industrial and textile divisions of Texize Chemicals, Inc., and formed Intex Products, Inc. He founded Texize Chemicals in 1945, serving as President and Treasurer and Chairman of the Board until 1971. He is a member of the Board of Directors of the National Association of Manufacturers. LeRoy W. Jeffries is founder and President of LeRoy W. Jeffries and Associates, Inc., a marketing and public relations firm in Los Angeles. Previously, he was Senior Vice President and Director of advertising with Johnson Publishing Company. He also has held positions with the Urban League of Greater New York, the National Urban League and served as a consultant to the Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Com- mission. Katherine D. Ortega is a consultant with Otero Savings and Loan Associa- tion in Alamogordo, New Mexico. Previously, she was President and Director of Santa Ana State Bank in Santa Ana, California, in 1975-77; Vice President and Cashier, Pan American National Bank in Los Angeles, California in 1972-75, and tax supervisor, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company in 1969-72. She was the first woman President of a bank in the State of California. Lincoln Johnson Ragsdale Sr. is President and Chairman of the Board of Valley Life and Casualty Insurance Group, and owner of International Investment Company in Phoenix, Arizona. He is currently a member of the National Urban League Board of Trustees and member of the Board of Directors of the National Conference of Christians and Jews, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Booker T. Washington Foundation, and Director of Sun State Savings and Loan Association. 11 Stanley S. Scott is Vice President of Public Affairs, Philip Morris, U.S.A., in New York. He was Director of Corporate Public Affairs and Assistant Director, Corporate Relations and Communications, in 1977-79. Scott served as Assist- ant Administrator, Bureau for Africa, Department of State, in 1975-77, and was Special Assistant to the President in the White House in 1973-75. He was Assistant Director of Public Relations, National Association for the Advance- ment of Colored People, in 1966-67. Walter Larke Sorg is President, Walter Larke Sorg Associates, a management consulting firm in Washington, D.C. He was appointed to participate in organization and development of the Office of Minority Business Enterprise, Department of Commerce, in 1969, and later served as Assistant Director, Director of National Programs. He was engaged in financial printing in 1947-69. Del Green has been serving as President since 1972 of Del Green Associates, Inc., a minority owned management consultant firm. He was Project Director for the National Committee Against Discrimination in Hous- ing, San Francisco Bay Area in 1970-1972. He served as Executive Vice- President for Roy Littlejohn Associates in 1971-72. He was National Direc- tor, Volt Technical Corporation OED/CAP Training and Technical Assistance Project in 1968-1971. In 1965-1968, he was Director, Health Affairs, Economic Opportunity Council in San Francisco, California. Stephen Postupack currently owns and is associated with the following businesses in Tamaqua, Pennsylvania: Northeastern Hydro-Seeding Com- pany, Post Printing Company, Post Construction Company, Anthracite Forest Service, Anthracite Land and Development Company, Tree House Garden Center, and Hometown Garage. 10 Functions The Presidential Advisory Committee, by statute, was created to facilitate the purposes of paragraph (3) of Section 204 of P.L. 95-507: "The Administration shall encourage the placement of subcontracts by businesses with small business concerns located in areas of high concentra- tion of unemployed or low-income individuals, with small businesses owned by low-income individuals, and with small businesses eligible to receive con- tracts pursuant to Section 8(a) of this Act. The Administration may provide incentives and assistance to such businesses that will aid in the training and upgrading of potential subcontractors or other small business concerns eligi- ble for assistance under sections 7(i), 7(j), and 8(a) of this Act." By Executive Order 12190, February 1, 1980, the functions of the Presiden- tial Advisory Committee were defined as follows: 1-201. (a) The Committee shall assist in monitoring and encouraging the placement of subcontracts by the private sector with eligible small businesses, particularly with small minority businesses, and shall study and propose the incentives and assistance needed by the private sector to help in the training, development, and upgrading of such businesses. (b) Eligible small businesses are those located in areas of high concentration of unemployed or low-income individuals, businesses owned by low-income individuals, and those businesses eligible for assistance under Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637 (a), 92 Stat, 1761). 1-202. The Committee shall make periodic reports and recommendations to the President through the Administrator of the Small Business Administration and shall offer such other advice and at such times as the President through the Administrator may request. 1-203. The Committee, through its Chairman, shall report annually to the President and to the Congress on the activities of the Committee during the preceding calendar year. Introduction At the outset, the Presidential Advisory Committee analyzed Executive Order 12190 functions and developed goals and objectives for its one-year term. The Executive order directives to the Committee were two-fold: 1) " shall assist in monitoring and encouraging the placement of subcontracts by the private sector with eligible small businesses, particularly with small minority business; and 2) shall study and propose the incentives and assistance needed by the private sector to help in the training, development, and upgrading of such businesses." The objectives developed to accomplish the first directive were: a) to encourage direct prime contracting with eligible small and small minority businesses; b) to identify and encourage those large corporations which have successful con- tracting relationships with small and small minority businesses to offer sug- gestions and/or to simply "tell their story"; c) to perform an outreach function to inform and educate private sector groups, business organizations, trade associations, chambers of commerce, and small and small minority en- trepreneurs. 13 The objectives developed to accomplish the second directive were: a) to en- courage the creation of tax credits as incentives to firms which fulfill the Administration's criteria for contracting with small and small minority firms; b) to encourage the establishment of a contract-award incentive pro- gram SO that Federal contracts could be awarded to participating firms if they bid within a specific range of the actual competitive bid, e.g., perhaps 4-5% of the lowest acceptable bid; c) to study incentives that would provide the private sector with economic benefits for creating new full-time jobs; d) to encourage firms to provide management and technical assistance to specific minority businesses by rewarding such firms with a tax credit or bonus based on the improved performance of the minority business; e) to establish a public service recognition award which would be presented to those firms volunteering their service, expertise, and time to upgrade the small and small minority business program. To achieve these objectives, the Committee requested support services from the Small Business Administration and recognizes the SBA staff participation in each aspect of the Committee's operation and activities. In addition, several Committee ad hoc subcommittees were designated by the Chairman to examine areas of specific concern The Committee acknowledges that 1982 was a year of fact-finding, outreach, and analysis. The public hearing process was utilized to provide the widest possible opportunity for small, small minority and big business executives to express their concerns about the needs, incentives, procedures, and relation- ships of small and small minority businesses to the large corporations that conduct business with and for the United States Government. Thirteen (13) public hearings were conducted by the Committee. Testimony was received on a broad range of issues from a broad-based group of witnesses who participated in the thirteen hearings. One hundred and six (106) minority business owners, non-minority small business executives, minority trade association officers, non-minority small business advocates, private sector corporate executives, private sector organization represen- tatives, educators, and government officials provided substantial information to the Committee. Individual members of the Committee participated in numerous ad hoc sub- committee meetings with businesspersons, trade groups, and government representatives. These additional meetings, initiated by the Committee members, were held for the purpose of strengthening the Committee's responsibility for monitoring and encouraging the placement of subcontracts by the private sector. These meetings provided an opportunity for the Com- mittee to establish a network of private sector contacts for follow-up discus- sions on pertinent issues and, hopefully, set a positive tone of "working together" in the interest of small and small minority businesses. There were twelve volumes of testimony on issues, as well as Committee member notes from ad hoc meetings, that could be categorized as procedural and financial. For summary purposes, the following observations are presented: 1/4 of the witnesses expressed concern over the negative impact of the economic downturn on small and small minority businesses; 1/3 of the witnesses raised the long-term problem of race as a factor in not gaining access to Federal procurement opportunities, both directly and in- directly through the private and public sector, and how the current Ad- ministration will address it; 14 1/2 of the witnesses testified that basic business education, and technical and management assistance were needed; 3/4 of the witnesses testified that capital availability shortage and its atten- dant issues in the minority community were priority problems; 1/4 of the witnesses expressed concern over procedural and regulatory dif- ficulties encountered by small and small minority businesses in working with programs designed to assist them. The findings and recommendations that follow were derived after many hours of discussion on the testimony, ad hoc meetings, and on overall perspective that private sector participation in the small and small minority business pro- grams is crucial to "mainstreaming" these firms. 15 Calendar of Public Hearings First Hearing 18 Feb. 1982 Washington, D.C. Second Hearing 8 & 9 March 1982 Washington, D.C. Third Hearing 30 April 1982 Washington, D.C. Fourth Hearing 14 June 1982 San Francisco, California Fifth Hearing 30 July 1982 Washington, D.C. Sixth Hearing 23 Aug. 1982 Chicago, Illinois Seventh Hearing 15 Sept. 1982 Dallas, Texas Eighth Hearing 18 Oct. 1982 Phoenix, Arizona Ninth Hearing 25 Oct. 1982 Juneau, Alaska Tenth Hearing 26 Oct. 1982 Anchorage, Alaska Eleventh Hearing 28 Oct. 1982 Fairbanks, Alaska Ad Hoc Public Hearings Twelfth Hearing 19 Oct. 1982 Window Rock, Navajo Nation Thirteenth Hearing 27 Oct. 1982 Kotzebue, Alaska Transcripts and minutes were prepared for each Hearing. A complete list of Hearing witnesses is contained in the Appendix. 17 Findings and Recommendations graphic area at a given time. Data ty are dependent on a sensitive collection, analysis, and dissemination awareness of the small and minority 1. Eliminate Discriminatory Practices to agencies, private and public con- business range of capability. tractors, as well as small and minori- Race and ethnic origins continue to ty businesspersons, is critical to the An additional aspect of this pro- handicap small and small minority achievement of P.L. 95-507. cedure is the degree to which the businesses. Testimony of specific agency goals are achieved through discriminatory practices was provided subcontracting plan implementation. by various minority groups. Procurement officers and prime con- tractors must have data on minority RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDATION: business identification and capability that anchors their response to P.L. To the extent that discrimination con- The identification of small and minori- 95-507. tinues to handicap small and small ty businesspersons, coupled with an minority businesses, the government up-to-date assessment of their RECOMMENDATION: and the private sector must be capabilities, is crucial to the imple- vigilant in identifying and taking the mentation of the achievement of This Presidential Advisory Committee necessary procedural steps to agency procurement goals. The Com- supports the statement by President eliminate it. mittee recommends assurance that Reagan, dated December 17, 1982, such data are made available through regarding this Administration's 2. Improve Enforcement of Public the efforts of interagency cooperation steps to promote an economic en- Law 95-507 to resolve any current deficiencies in vironment in which minority en- data identification, collection, and trepreneurs can better marshal their Testimony was presented regarding dissemination. In addition, the Com- talents and skills to achieve better data that Federal Government agen- mittee recommends that incentives lives for themselves and, in so doing, cy procurement subcontracting should be developed for increased contribute to a stronger economic guidelines under Public Law 95-507 private sector participation in the base for America." The President have not been met since adoption of P.L. 95-507 procurement oppor- established procurement goals for the law. tunities. Specific attention and study minority business as well as directed should be given to mechanisms such other measures to be taken to im- A general trend of testimony as "The adjusted bid factor" sug- prove federal procurement oppor- throughout the hearings was the lack gested to the Office of Federal Pro- tunities for minority businesses. This of adequate mechanisms to enforce curement Policy. Committee encourages the the subcontracting provisions of P.L. strengthening of the SBA role in 95-507. 3. Increase Federal Agency MBE Pro monitoring the implementation of the curement Goals President's goals and in assessing The overall compliance with the spirit problems which may surface from and intent of P.L. 95-507 is of con- While procurement goals are set on time to time. cern to all. Specific suggestions and an agency-by-agency basis, there is guidelines are being studied by no direct correlation between minor This Committee supports the findings various Federal agencies, as well as ty business capacity to absorb the of the SBA Task Force on P.L. the SBA Task Force on P.L. 95-507 procurement opportunities and the 95-507, particularly with respect to implementation. Hopefully, these fur- agency goals. It is generally observed establishing incentives for prime con- ther reports will deal with the areas that there are more than enough tractors, the long-term goal of in- of concern expressed throughout the small and minority businesses to ab- creasing small business subcontrac- hearings. sorb the federal procurement oppor- ting participation to a level of 35% tunities, with the capacity to expand and minority business participation to Of specific concern to this Presiden- on a profitable basis, if the procure- a level of 15%. tial Advisory Committee is the ment opportunities were increased establishment of policy to address and made on a multi-year basis when Further, this Committee recommends procedures to follow with prime con- the prime contract is multi-year. that assurance must be ascertained tractors who are not in compliance that the procurement process with the law to encourage and enable It is critical to the procurement pro- operates to achieve equality and them to live up to the spirit of P.L. cess that the data in the SBA port- fairness to subcontractors vis-a-vis 95-507. folio of business be made available to their relation to prime contractors. agency procurement divisions for Such issues as multi-year subcon- Associated with this issue is the marketing purposes. The achieve- tracts, cancellation of contracts, and paucity of data on small and minority ment of the procurement goals and prompt payment of subcontractors businesspersons in a given geo- the assessment of absorptive capaci- must be studied to implement pro- 19 cedures that achieve the letter and government must continue, through 6. Broaden SBA 8(a) Program spirit of P.L. 95-507. SBA, Office of Federal Procurement Participation Policy, and interagency cooperation, to refine the process to clear Testimony obtained from numerous regulatory "bottlenecks". witnesses, as well as data made 4.Eliminate Red Tape and Paperwork available to the Committee, support 5. Strengthen Education, Technical our finding that a significant number Red tape and paperwork are and Management Assistance of qualified minority business enter- obstacles to small and minority Programs prises are unable to participate in the businesspersons effectively partici- 8(a) program. This Committee pating in federal procurement oppor- There was considerable testimony ex- recognizes the importance of a conti- tunities. Testimony was presented pressing concern as to the disadvan- nuing and improved 8(a) program. that graphically emphasized that tages experienced by small, and bureaucratic procedures can impede especially small minority businessper- and/or discourage even the well- sons, in the marketplace due to in- RECOMMENDATION: prepared minority businesses. Appli- adequate educational opportunities; cation procedures for most loans, which lead to less than competitive It is important that a continuing ef- technical and management technical expertise and management fort be made to ascertain the assistance, 8(a) certification and skills. feasibility of funding and program- participation in publicly-sponsored matic solutions to alleviate this pro- procurement (bidders' list) are RECOMMENDATION: blem, taking into consideration the cumbersome, lengthy, fragmented, realities of the current budgetary costly, and discouraging. The net ef- The Committee encourages the restraints in government. fect of which is to block or hinder the implementation of the President's initiative and/or successful entry of directive to the Minority Business minority businesses into Federal Development Agency (MBDA), SBA, procurement opportunities. Here, and the SBA Small Business Develop- 7. Encourage Creative Capital too, is a cause for the non- ment Centers to provide manage- Formation Techniques achievement of procurement goals. ment and technical assistance to minority firms requesting and receiv- The inability of small and small Federal regulations, program and ing assistance. Guidelines for Federal minority businesspersons to ade- procedural guidelines, must be contracting with firms that service quately accumulate sufficient capital regularly reviewed for their impact on small and small minority businesses to start, expand, or diversify their the successful achievement of P.L. under Federal programs. e.g., SBA businesses is perhaps the most dif- 95-507 requirements. 7(j) and MBDA Business Develop- ficult barrier to overcome. Without ment Centers, should require that access to new sources of capital, An example of the benefits to be such contractors have demonstrable small and small minority businesses derived from constant regulatory sensitivities to groups intended to be will never be able to expand, diversi- review was experienced by this Com- served. Furthermore, the Committee fy, and overcome the many barriers mittee's work in the area of capital encourages SBA and MBDA to in the marketplace. The capital must formation. The Office of Federal develop, through a structured inter- come from new innovative sources, Procurement Policy is currently con- action with colleges, universities, as well as existing sources that have templating the implementation of a trade associations, and major firms not been adequately utilized or change in the P.L. 95-507 regulations volunteering their resources, a multi- leveraged. to permit a percentage of monies level program to assist entry level deposited by federal contractors with small and small minority businessper- A number of recommendations which minority owned banks, savings and sons; as well as such firms that need were made to this Committee are loan institutions and insurance com- more specific assistance on different deserving of further study. Among panies to qualify under P.L. 95-507 levels. these are: subcontracting plan goals. The implementation of this change may The Committee is particularly en- a) Syndicate SBA guaranteed loans well result in a substantial increase in couraged by the development of em- to induce participating lending insti- the pool of capital resources available phasis on small and small minority tutions to increase their small and to small and minority businesses. business entrepreneurship at some of small minority business loan portfolio; our nation's leading colleges and RECOMMENDATION: universities, and encourages the ex- b) Strengthen the minority bank pansion of these efforts. deposit program by earmarking a Federal regulations, program and percentage of funds obtained from procedural guidelines must be federal sources for this purpose; regularly reviewed for their impact on the successful achievement of P.L. 95-507 requirements; as well, the 20 c) Review the possible expansion of which, without prompt payment, can- RECOMMENDATION: lending activities which channel their not fulfill their contractual obligations resources to small and small minority that require a reliable and steady It is essential that improvements be business firms: cash flow. The essential point is that made in providing bonding to small subcontractors should be paid as and small minority businesses. A Small Business Investment timely as prime contractors. combination of actions should be Companies explored: raise bond ceilings; expand MESBICs RECOMMENDATION: SBA's guarantee program; and Insurance Companies provide incentives for public and It is essential that the government private entities to assist in d) Determine the incrementation of and prime contractors remove the underwriting the cost. The raising of small and small minority business unnecessary bottlenecks that cause these ceilings would substantially participation in the export trading delay in contractual payments to decrease paperwork and related program; small and small minority businesses. government expenses. The SBA is encouraged to review this e) Encourage the expansion of procedure with procurement officials private sector joint ventures with who approve invoice payments and small and small minority businesses, affect the timing of such payments by especially in the area of high the U.S. Treasury. Specifically, a technology; review of the existing procedures for processing payment should be under- f) Encourage Federal prime contrac- taken to mandate that payment to tors to provide needed capital subcontractors by prime contractors resources to small and small minority must coincide with the receipt of pay- A second document has been developed for business subcontractors through ment by the prime contractor. those who desire further detail. various mechanisms; including the purchase of stock to increase their capital base. RECOMMENDATION 9. Support Realistic Bonding Mechanisms It is essential to a successful effort in seeking the cooperation of major Any company seeking to perform con- companies in the private sector to struction work for the government is provide assistance to small and small almost always required to post one or minority businesses in capital forma- more bonds guaranteeing completion tion that there is developed a of the project and payment of bills. blueprint to follow. Several role Without bonding capacity, a company models have surfaced in the recent cannot bid as a prime contractor in past whose results are most en- most instances. couraging. Small and minority firms have historically faced difficulties in gaining access to the bonding market. This is 8. Insure Prompt Payment to generally a result of a combination of Subcontractors the nature of the bonding industry and the characteristics of small and Many small and small minority minority firms. businesses are dealt serious financial and contractual setbacks by not The extensive problems experienced receiving prompt payment of invoices by minority firms in obtaining bond- submitted for work completed on ing were described by a number of government contracts and subcon- witnesses. It is clear that this is an tracts. This is a particularly wor- area requiring study, analysis, and risome problem to these businesses program development. 21 WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name Withdrawer Deaver, Michael: Files KDB 9/9/2011 File Folder FOIA AUGUST 1983 - SEPTEMBER 1983 MISCELLANEOUS F97-066/19 INCOMING (7) COHEN, D Box Number 14 1 ID Document Type No of Doc Date Restric- Document Description pages tions 118274 MEMO 3 9/30/1983 B1 WILLIAM BROCK TO M. DEAVER RE WILLIAMSBURG COMMITMENTS ON TRADE The above documents were not referred for declassification review at time of processing Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift. WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name Withdrawer Deaver, Michael: Files KDB 9/9/2011 File Folder FOIA AUGUST 1983 - SEPTEMBER 1983 MISCELLANEOUS F97-066/19 INCOMING (7) COHEN, D Box Number 14 1 ID Document Type No of Doc Date Restric- Document Description pages tions 118275 REPORT 9 ND B1 IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMITMENTS ON TRADE FROM THE WILLIAMSBURG SUMMIT MEETING The above documents were not referred for declassification review at time of processing Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift.