Ask the Scholar
Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
Digital Library Collections
This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections.
Collection: Roberts, John G.: Files
Folder Title: JGR/Article on the Presidency,
National Forum (7 of 7)
Box: 4
To see more digitized collections visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library
To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection
Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected]
Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing
National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/
WITHDRAWAL SHEET
Ronald Reagan Library
Collection Name ROBERTS, JOHN: FILES
Withdrawer
RBW
8/3/2005
File Folder
JGR/ARTICLE ON THE PRESIDENCY, NATIONAL
FOIA
FORUM (7 OF 7)
F05-139/01
Box Number
COOK
6RW
DOC Doc Type
Document Description
No of Doc Date Restrictions
NO
Pages
1
CHECK
PERSONAL CHECK
1 11/21/1985
B6
439
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
E.O. 13233
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift.
August 28, 1985
Mr. John Roberts
THE NEW
Associate Counsel to the President
FEDERALIST
Room 106, EOB
PAPERS
The White House
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Roberts:
Enclosed is a copy of my letter of this date to
Mr. Fielding, requesting permission to reprint the
President's article, "The Presidency: Roles and
Responsibilities" from the Fall, 1984 issue of National
Forum. I hope the President will give his permission
for us to use an excerpt from his article, and I
would be very grateful for your assistance in this
matter.
Sincerely,
Jack Barlow
Editor
PUBLIC RESEARCH,
SYNDICATED
480 N. Indian +ill Blvd
Suite
Clarement, CA 91711
(714) 621-5831
August 28, 1985
THE NEW
Mr. Fred Fielding
FEDERALIST
Counsel to the President
PAPERS
The White House
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Fielding:
Editorial Advisors:
Francis Canavan
I write at the suggestion of Dr. Mark Cannon to request
Fordham University
permission to reprint President Reagan's article, "The
Don E. Fehrenbacher
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities," from the Fall,
Stanford University
1984 National Forum as part of The New Federalist Papers.
Suzanne Garment
The Wall Street Journal
The New Federalist Papers is the bicentennial project of
Philip Kurland
Public Research, Syndicated, and is supported in part by
The University of Chicago
a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities.
Leonard W. Levy
The project began in January of 1984. Each month we
Claremont Graduate School
syndicate six articles on constitutional themes to a
Abigail Thernstrom
nationwide audience. Two articles a month are sent, free
Twentieth Century Fund
of charge, to more than two thousand small, community
newspapers. A weekly article is sent to some one hundred
daily papers. The articles examine the various
provisions of the Constitution, as well as its historical
roots, its political principles, and its meaning today.
A distinguished roster of authors has contributed to the
series, including Chief Justice Burger, former Attorney
General Smith, Civil Rights Commission Chairman Clarence
Pendleton, and former Senator Eugene McCarthy. From the
scholarly community, we have had articles from Henry
Steele Commager, Samuel Beer, Gordon S. Wood, Harry V.
Jaffa, and many others. We hope the President will be
willing to join this group.
PUBLIC RESEARCH,
SYNDICATED
480 N Indian Hill Blvd
Dr. Cannon and the editors of National Forum have given
Suite
us their permission to excerpt and syndicate selected
Claremont, CA-91711
articles from the Fall, 1984 issue of National Forum, of
(714) 621-5831
which Dr. Cannon was guest editor. We have already
4650 ARROW HIGHWA
syndicated articles by Dr. Cannon, Speaker of the House
SUITE D7
O'Neill, and Chief Justice Burger, and we plan to use two
MONTCLAIR, CA 9176
or three more as well.
We would excerpt about 800 words from the President's
article; if we are given permission, we would plan to do
the preliminary editing here and send it to you for
approval. If, however, it would be preferable to have the
editing done by someone on the staff there, we would certainly be
open to such an arrangement. We offer an honorarium of $250.
Both the legislative and the judicial branches have been
represented in our series; I hope the President will be willing
to join in this public celebration of the Constitution's
bicentennial. If I can provide you with further information
about the project, or answer any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
tab Bulon
Jack Barlow
Editor
CC: John Roberts
JB/wp
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 4, 1985
MEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING
FROM:
JOHN G. ROBERTS 926
SUBJECT:
Request to Reprint President's Article:
"The Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities"
The Editor of The New Federalist Papers, a bicentennial
project of Public Research, Syndicated, has asked permission
to reprint and distribute an 800-word excerpt from the
President's article "The Presidency: Roles and Responsi-
bilities," which first appeared in the Fall 1984 National
Forum. The New Federalist Papers project provides articles
to newspapers across the country free of charge. Several
articles from the National Forum edition have already been
syndicated by The New Federalist Papers, including the Chief
Justice's and the Speaker's, not to mention Dr. Mark Cannon's.
Permission is not required to reprint the President's
article, since it was prepared in the course of his official
duties. 17 U.S.C. § 105. The attached reply notes that
permission is not required, and thanks the editor for
offering to let us approve their editing of the President's
article.
Attachment
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 4, 1985
Dear Mr. Barlow:
Thank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission
to reprint and distribute the President's article, "The
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities," as part of The New
Federalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint
and distribute the article, and I have no objection to your
plans to do SO.
You have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from
the President's article, and that you will submit the edited
version for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to
do this, and look forward to receiving your proposed
excerpt.
The New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am
pleased to learn of your plans to include the President's
article.
Sincerely,
Orig. signed by FFF
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Mr. Jack Barlow
4650 Arrow Highway
Suite D7
Montclair, CA 91763
FFF:JgR:aea 9/4/85
bcc: FFFielding
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 4, 1985
Dear Mr. Barlow:
Thank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission
to reprint and distribute the President's article, "The
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities," as part of The New
Federalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint
and distribute the article, and I have no objection to your
plans to do SO.
You have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from
the President's article, and that you will submit the edited
version for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to
do this, and look forward to receiving your proposed
excerpt.
The New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am
pleased to learn of your plans to include the President's
article.
Sincerely,
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Mr. Jack Barlow
4650 Arrow Highway
Suite D7
Montclair, CA 91763
FFF: JgR:aea 9/4/85
bcc: FFFielding
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
343999
ID #
CU
JV
WHITE HOUSE
PRO1409
CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET
o . OUTGOING
H . INTERNAL
R
I . INCOMING
Date Correspondence
Name of Correspondent: / Jack Barlaw
Received (YY/MM/DD)
MI Mail Report
User Codes: (A)
(B)
(c)
Subject: Request to reprent POTUS' article "The
Presidency Roles & Responsibilities"
ROUTE TO:
ACTION
DISPOSITION
Tracking
Type
Completion
Action
Date
of
Date
Office/Agency
(Staff Name)
Code
YY/MM/DD
Response
Code
YY/MM/DD
Curture
85,09,03
WS
ORIGINATOR
/ /
Referral Note:
cunt 18
D
85,09,04 WS
5 85 109114
Referral Note:
/ /
/ /
Referral Note:
/
/
/ /
-
Referral Note:
/ /
/
/
Referral Note:
ACTION CODES:
DISPOSITION CODES:
A * Appropriate Action
I - Into Copy Only/No Action Necessary
A Answered
C Completed
C . Comment/Recommendation
R Direct Reply w/Copy
B . Non-Special Referral
S Suspended
D Draft Response
S For Signature
F - Furnish Fact Sheet
X - Interim Reply
to be used as Enclosure
FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:
Type of Response = Initials of Signer
Code = "A"
Completion Date = Date of Outgoing
Comments:
Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.
Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).
Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files.
Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.
5/81
3₫3999
gust 28, 1985
THE NEW
:. Fred Fielding
FEDERALIST
ounsel to the President
PAPERS
he White House
ashington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Fielding:
Editorial Advisors:
Francis Canavan
I write at the suggestion of Dr. Mark Cannon to request
Fordham University
permission to reprint President Reagan's article, "The
Don E. Fehrenbacher
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities," from the Fall,
Stanford University
1984 National Forum as part of The New Federalist Papers.
Suzanne Garment
The Wall Street Journal
The New Federalist Papers is the bicentennial project of
Philip Kurland
Public Research, Syndicated, and is supported in part by
The University of Chicago
a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities.
Leonard W. Levy
The project began in January of 1984. Each month we
Cláremont Graduate School
syndicate six articles on constitutional themes to a
Abigal Themstrem
nationwide audience. Two articles a month are sent, free
Twentieth Century Fund
of charge, to more than two thousand small, community
newspapers. A weekly article is sent to some one hundred
daily papers. The articles examine the various
provisions of the Constitution, as well as its historical
roots, its political principles, and its meaning today.
A distinguished roster of authors has contributed to the
series, including Chief Justice Burger, former Attorney
General Smith, Civil Rights Commission Chairman Clarence
Pendleton, and former Senator Eugene McCarthy. From the
scholarly community, we have had articles from Henry
Steele Commager, Samuel Beer, Gordon S. Wood, Harry V.
Jaffa, and many others. We hope the President will be
willing to join this group.
PUBLIC RESEARCH,
SYNDICATED
180 N. Indian ++++ Blvd
Dr. Cannon and the editors of National Forum have given
Suite 2
us their permission to excerpt and syndicate selected
Claremont, CA
articles from the Fall, 1984 issue of National Forum, of
(714) 621-5831
which Dr. Cannon was guest editor. We have already
4650 ARBOW HIGHWA
syndicated articles by Dr. Cannon, Speaker of the House
SUITE
O'Neill, and Chief Justice Burger, and we plan to use two
MONTCLAIR, CA 917
or three more as well.
We would excerpt about 800 words from the President's
article; if we are given permission, we would plan to do
the preliminary editing here and send it to you for
approval. If, however, it would be preferable to have the
editing done by someone on the staff there, we would certainly be
open to such an arrangement. We offer an honorarium of $250.
Both the legislative and the judicial branches have been
represented in our series; I hope the President will be willing
to join in this public celebration of the Constitution's
bicentennial. If I can provide you with further information
about the project, or answer any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
tab Bulow
Jack Barlow
Editor
CC: John Roberts
JB/wp
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 18, 1985
Dear Professor Daug Kmiec:
Thank you for your recent note transmitting a copy of the
issue of the Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy
devoted to the line-item veto. As you know, the President
has long supported a constitutional amendment to provide
this power to the Chief Executive.
As the President explained in an article on the Presidency
for the issue of National Forum devoted to the Bicentennial
of the Constitution, granting such power to the Chief
Executive would not alter the constitutional balance but in
fact restore the Framers' original design. In return for
your sending along a copy of the Journal, I have taken the
liberty of enclosing a copy of the National Forum issue
containing this article.
Thank you again for the Journal issue, which I am certain
will be helpful to those at the White House most actively
involved with this timely topic.
With best wishes,
Sincerely,
Orig. signed by FFF
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Professor Douglas W. Kmiec
Notre Dame Law School
Notre Dame, IN 46556
FFF:JGR:aea 10/18/85
cc: FFFielding
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 22, 1985
MEMORANDUM FOR WILLIAM MARTIN
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
FROM:
JOHN G. ROBERTS
ASSOCIATE COUNSEL THE PRESIDENT
SUBJECT:
Presidential Article
for The Times (of London)
Counsel's Office has reviewed the above-referenced
Presidential article, and finds no objection to it
from a legal perspective.
CC: David L. Chew
ID #
CU
WHITE HOUSE
CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET
0 . OUTGOING
H . INTERNAL
I - INCOMING
Date Correspondence
Received (YY/MM/DD)
/ /
D chew
Name of Correspondent:
MI Mail Report
User Codes: (A)
(B)
(C)
Subject: Presidential article far The Times (af Conclon
ROUTE TO:
ACTION
DISPOSITION
Tracking
Type
Completion
Action
Date
of
Date
Office/Agency
(Staff Name)
Code
YY/MM/DD
Response
Code
YY/MM/DD
cultace
ORIGINATOR 85,10,22
/ /
Referral Note:
was 18
R 85,10,22
5 85,10,22
Referral Note:
4pm
/ /
/ /
Referral Note:
/ /
/ /
Referral Note:
/ /
/
/
Referral Note:
ACTION CODES:
DISPOSITION CODES:
A - Appropriate Action
I Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary
A Answered
C Completed
C Comment/Recommendation-
R. Direct Reply w/Copy
B - Non-Special Referral
S Suspended
D Draft Response
S For Signature
F Furnish Fact Sheet
X Interim Reply
to be used as Enclosure
FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:
Type of Response = Initials of Signer
Code
"A"
Completion-Date Date of Outgoing
Comments:
Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.
Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).
Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files.
Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.
5/81
Document No.
WHITE HOUSE STAFFING MEMORANDUM
DATE: 10/21/85
ACTION/CONCURRENCE/COMMENT DUE BY: 10/22/85, 4:00 p.m.
SUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL ARTICLE FOR THE TIMES (OF LONDON)
ACTION FYI
ACTION FYI
VICE PRESIDENT
LACY
REGAN
McFARLANE
MILLER
OGLESBY
BUCHANAN
RYAN
CHAVEZ
SPEAKES
CHEW
P
SS SPRINKEL
DANIELS
SVAHN
FIELDING
THOMAS
FRIEDERSDORF
TUTTLE
HENKEL
HICKEY
HICKS
KINGON
REMARKS:
Please submit your comments, edits or recommendations directly to
Bill Martin of the NSC with an info copy to my office by 4:00 p.m.
TOMORROW. Thank you.
RESPONSE:
David L. Chew
Staff Secretary
Ext. 2702
8390
NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20506
October 21, 1985
Has shot turnes.
MEMORANDUM FOR DAVID L. CHEW
Tx. Brt
FROM:
WILLIAM F. MARTIN WISE
SUBJECT:
Presidential Article for The Times (of London)
Attached is an NSC-approved article, to be signed by the President,
for submission to The Times (of London) for inclusion in a
Special Supplement commemorating The Times' 200th anniversary.
The Times has asked various Heads of State to submit 850-word
articles on their vision for their own country in the year 2000.
Please circulate to appropriate members of the White House staff
for clearance and return comments to the NSC, as this article
must be submitted to the Washington office of The Times by
Tuesday afternoon, October 22.
Many thanks.
Attachments
TAB A
Proposed Presidential article
TAB B
Incoming letter from The Times
The daily press of events often leaves one little time to
reflect on the future, so I welcome The Times' invitation to
write about my vision of America in the year 2000. It is
appropriate that I do so in the pages of the oldest daily
newspaper in the world, a symbol of freedom older than our own
Constitution.
Unlike most nations, the United States was founded on a
vision. We see our history as a constant striving toward the
vision set down in our Declaration of Independence and
Constitution. That vision is of a nation where every person,
regardless of background or beliefs. is free to realize his or
her full potential. spiritual and material. America was
founded the principle that freedom and progress should not
be the preserve of the lucky few, but the universal right of
all.
I see an America in the year 2000 which has made further
progress toward realizing the noble vision. All Americans
today have the freedom to think and worship as they please.
The vast majority have the freedom to find fulfillment in their
work, in their quality of life, and with their loved ones.
-2-
We will not be satisfied until every American knows this
freedom. The remaining barriers to self-fulfillment are
largely economic in nature, so economic growth is the key to
future opportunity. This growth depends on keeping government
out of the way of human talent and initiative. Where people
are free to pursue their ideas and dreams, prosperity and
opportunity are the rule. Where government becomes the
people's master, rather than their servant, creativity is
stifled and progress impeded. In the past four and a half
years, with policies trusting to the people, America has
restored its economic vigor; we have created 8 million new jobs
in the past three years. Government has an essential role to
play, but there can no longer be any doubt that the true source
of economic growth is the individual, not the state.
If we stick by this truth, the opportunity for fulfillment
that most Americans know today can be available to even more by
the year 2000. My vision is one where poverty will be greatly
reduced. We will have succeeded in tearing down completely the
walls of intolerance that once divided our citizens.
Technology will be making unprecedented advances in spreading
knowledge and facilitating human comfort; science will have
immeasurably enhanced life and, I pray, found a cure for cancer
and other dread diseases.
-3-
If other nations follow the path of economic freedom, and
uphold a system of free and fair trade, then more rapid
economic growth will surge throughout the world. Expanding
opportunity will be an international phenomenon. And the more
advanced nations will be able to be more generous in helping
those nations in need. The gap between developed and
developing nations will narrow; indeed, many of the latter will
join the ranks of the former.
The exercise of freedom presupposes peace. I pray that as
we look back from the year 2000, we will be able to contrast
with the horrors of the first half of the century, the relative
peace of the second half. I do not expect the stark
differences between the democracies and the totalitarian
countries to have vanished, so I see an America and a Western
alliance that have maintained their strength and resolve such
that no aggressor could have thought he could gain from war.
If we do this, my prayer will be met.
The United States will continue to rely on deterrence to
keep the peace, but it will be a safer, more stable kind of
deterrence than today's. Rather than rely solely on the threat
of retaliation -- of avenging lives lost -- it will be based
more on the ability to defend human lives against nuclear
attack. Our Strategic Defense Initiative is a research
program, so I cannot predict at what stage we will find
ourselves in 2000.
-4-
I am an optimist, however, and I have to believe the same scientific
and engineering genius that invented the steam engine and sent a
man to the moon will find ways to make feasible defenses against
ballistic missiles, defenses that are survivable against counter-
measures and are cost-effective. If the Soviet Union sees the
potential of such defenses in its own research program, as I
believe it will, perhaps it will agree with us on a cooperative
transition to a system of deterrence based on a stable balance of
defense and offense -- at sharply lower levels of offensive
forces than today. Such an outcome would enable us to move some
time in the next century toward the complete elimination of
nuclear weapons. A strong conventional deterrent would, however,
remain vital.
Continued Western resolve could lead to the most hopeful
development of all. Frustrated in its expansionist aims, and
recognizing the imperatives for change at home, the Soviet Union
could agree with us to turn our competition away from armaments
to competition in benefiting mankind. We are not afraid of such
a competition. Is Mr. Gorbachev? I call on him to join us,
today, in this new context. Mankind would then be able to look
toward the new century, the third millennium of the modern era,
with an optimism and hope justified as never before.
THE TIMES
Times Newspapers Limited P.O. Box 7.
200 Gray's Inn Road. London WCI X 8EZ (registered office)
Telephone 01-837 1234 Telex 264971 Registered no. 894646 England
AH
From the Editor
Kamael
September 25, 1985
President Ronald Reagan,
The White House,
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
Washington DC 20500,
U.S.A.
Dear Mr. President,
As you know, The Times is celebrating its
bicentenary this year and in the course of the year
we have carried a number of bicentenary Special Reports
on those major countries of the world with which we
have had a close and continuous relationship during
the 200 years. In each case we have invited the Head
of State to contribute to our Report with a short
article of 850 words. The theme of this article
would be your vision for the United States in the
year 2000 and we would need the article by October 21.
I know how busy you are, Mr. President, but I
do hope you would be able to find time to enhance
this paper's coverage of the United States past and
future as you would surely do with an article of that
kind.
Yours sincerely,
Aome
Charles Douglas-Home
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
November 6, 1985
MEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING
FROM:
JOHN G. ROBERTS $22
SUBJECT:
Draft Version of the President's Article
"The Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities"
We previously noted no objection to the proposal to publish
an 800-word excerpt from the President's article on the
Presidency as part of the New Federalist Papers series. The
editor of the series has now submitted the 800-word excerpt.
I have no objection to the excerpt.
Attachment
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
November 6, 1985
Dear Mr. Barlow:
Thank you for your letter of October 29. Along with that
letter you submitted an 800-word excerpt from the President's
article on the Presidency, which you propose to distribute
as part of the Bicentennial project of the New Federalist
Papers.
I have reviewed the excerpt and have no objection to it.
Thank you for your consideration in permitting us to review
the excerpt. Once again, best of luck with this exciting
project.
Sincerely,
Orig. signed by FFF
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Mr. Jack Barlow
480 N. Indian Hill Blvd.
Suite 2
Claremont, CA 91711
FFF: JGR:aea 11/6/85
CC: FFFielding
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
November 6, 1985
Dear Mr. Barlow:
Thank you for your letter of October 29. Along with that
letter you submitted an 800-word excerpt from the President's
article on the Presidency, which you propose to distribute
as part of the Bicentennial project of the New Federalist
Papers.
I have reviewed the excerpt and have no objection to it.
Thank you for your consideration in permitting us to review
the excerpt. Once again, best of luck with this exciting
project.
Sincerely,
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Mr. Jack Barlow
480 N. Indian Hill Blvd.
Suite 2
Claremont, CA 91711
FFF:JGR:aea 11/6/85
CC: FFFielding
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
ID #. 343999 CU
WHITE HOUSE
PRO14.09
CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET
o * OUTGOING
H . INTERNAL
M-F
I . INCOMING
Date Correspondence
Received (YY/MM/DD)
/
/
Name of Correspondent:
Jack Barlow
MI Mail Report
User Codes: (A)
(B)
(C)
Subject:
Draft persion of the Presidents article
u Cine Presidency : Roles and Responsibilities 4
ROUTE TO:
ACTION
DISPOSITION
Tracking
Type
Completion
Action
Date
Office/Agency
of
(Staff Name)
Date
Code
YY/MM/DD
Response
Code
YY/MM/DD
Witalland
WS
ORIGINATOR 85,11,01
/ /
Referral Note:
WAT18
cont corresp
D 85,11,04
58511114
WS
Referral Note:
/ /
I
/ /
Referral Note:
/ /
I
/ /
Referral Note:
/ /
.
-
/ /
Referral Note:
ACTION CODES:
DISPOSITION CODES:
A Appropriate Action
I - Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary
C Comment/Recommendation
A Answered
C Completed
R - Direct Reply w/Copy
D Draft Response
B Non-Special Referral
S Suspended
S For Signature
F Furnish Fact Sheet
X Interim Reply
to be used as Enclosure
FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:
Type of Response = Initials of Signer
Code
II
"A"
Completion Date = Date of Outgoing
Comments:
Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.
Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).
Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files.
Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.
5/81
October 29, 1985
THE NEW
Mr. Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
FEDERALIST
The White House
PAPERS
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Fielding:
Please forgive my delay in preparing a draft version of the
FLATICIAL
Fordham Uraversity
President's article, "The Presidency: Roles and Responsibili-
ties," a copy of which I enclose. In cutting such a long article
Don $
Stantord
to 800-odd words, it was necessary to discard much good material;
what remains is the general treatment of the powers and duties of
Suzarine Garmen
The Wall street JOHN
the presidential office. I hope that this draft will meet your
approval. If there are particular things that in your opinion
Pruso NUMBER
The University of
should be included in the article, please feel free to suggest
them; bearing in mind that the article is already somewhat over
Lennard VV Life
Claremont Graguate some
the word limit that National Forum has agreed to.
ADIDAS
Twentieth Century Fune
We plan to send the President's article to our list of some 2100
small, community newspapers, and we will be happy to forward
copies of the tearsheets we receive, if you wish to see them. We
would like to send the article out November 27, if that schedule
is not an inconvenience for you.
Again, we are very pleased that we can include the President's
article in our Bicentennial series. We are hopeful that the
series can have the effect of reminding Americans of the
principles of the Constitution's framers, and of the importance
of maintaining the institutions the framers created. The
President's article is an important contribution to that effort.
Sincerely,
PUBLIC RESEARCH,
tab Banlow
SYNDICATED
4650 Arrow Highway
Suite D-7
Montclair, CA 91763
Jack Barlow
(714) 621-5831
Editor
885 words
THE PRESIDENCY: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
by Ronald W. Reagan
For nearly 200 years, the Constitution has endured with relatively few
amendments as a blueprint for freedom. In commemorating the Bicentennial of the
Constitution we celebrate not simply the historic event that took place in
Philadelphia on September 17, 1787, but the process by which we govern ourselves
today. There is no better time than this Bicentennial period to refamiliarize
ourselves with the Constitution and rededicate ourselves to the values it
embodies.
The central challenge confronting the Framers of the Constitution was to
create a strong national government that would not threaten the liberties so
recently won. The solution the Framers embraced was to diffuse the national
governmental authority. Power was to be shared among separate institutions --
the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary - in order that no single
branch could become so powerful as to threaten the liberties of the people. In
our study of the allocation of authority in the Constitution, it is important to
keep in mind the purpose of this allocation -- nothing less than the preserva-
tion of liberty.
The Framers looked primarily to the president to provide the critical
element of "energy" in the government. The problem with the government of the
Articles of Confederation had been that it was "destitute of energy." The
Drafters of the Constitution redressed that problem by vesting "competent
powers" in the executive to lead the Nation.
The president's popular mandate justified this grant of authority. The
president and the vice president are the only officials in our government elec-
ted through a process involving all the voters. Only the president can claim to
speak for all the people, because, as Hamilton wrote, his selection looks "in
1
the first instance to an immediate act of the people of America." The office of
president has "a due dependence on the people, and a due responsibility."
Perhaps the most pervasive responsibility of the president is to adminster
the executive branch. The Framers were practical men who recognized, as
Hamilton wrote, "that the true test of a good government is its aptitude and
tendency to produce a good administration." The people look ultimately to the
president to ensure the efficient performance of duty by the millions of federal
employees scattred among the various departments and agencies.
The challenge confronting the modern presidency is to "produce a good
administration" when the federal establishment has grown so far beyond anything
the framers could have imagined. It is an amazing fact that there are more
federal employees today than people living in America when the Framers drafted
the Constitution. Perhaps President George Washington could play an active role
in supervising the details of the first administration, but it is now the
responsibility of his successors to create mechanisms for the control and
coordination of the executive branch.
The president has no more important responsibility under the Constitution
than the conduct of foreign affairs. The Framers recognized that of the two
democratic branches, only the executive could successfully conduct foreign
relations. Hamilton noted in his description of the executive that "Decision,
activity, secrecy, and dispatch will generally characterize the proceedings of
one man in a much more eminent degree than the proceedings of any greater
number," and John Jay --- himself one of our most successful early diplomats -
argued that "the President will find no difficulty to provide" those qualities,
though they were beyond the capability of a basically deliberative body such as
Congress.
Apart from executive functions, the Constitution accords the president a
significant role in the legislative process. The people have grown to expect
2
leadership from the president not only in executing the laws but also in
presenting a legislative program to Congress for consideration.
Perhaps the most prominent of the president's legislative powers is the
qualified veto power. This power is qualified in the sense that a bill returned
by the president with disapproval can nonetheless be enacted into law by a two-
thirds vote of both houses. The Framers accorded the president a veto power for
two reasons. First, they recognized the "propensity of the legislative depart-
ment to intrude upon the rights, and to absorb the powers, of the other depart-
ments" and provided the president a veto so that he could defend the preroga-
tives of his office. The second purpose of the veto was as "an additional
security against the enaction of improper laws."
The powers of the presidency are limited, and the president discharges
constitutional responsibilities in a system according other powers to the coor-
dinate branches of the legislature and the judiciary. The members of all three
branches take an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it is a monument not only
to the genius of the Framers but also to the statesmanship of those who have
held office under the Constitution that the system has worked as well as it has.
Presidents have learned advisors at their disposal, and they can consult
with Congress, but the difficult and potentially momentous decisions the Consti-
tution vests in the executive are, in the final analysis, the president's alone.
Our most tested president, Abraham Lincoln, announced a guide for making those
decisions that has yet to be bettered:
I desire so to conduct the affairs of this Administration
that if, at the end, when I come to lay down the reins of
power, I have lost every other friend on earth, I shall at
least have one friend left, and that friend shall be down inside
of me.
END-END-END
3
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 4, 1985
Dear Mr. Barlow:
Thank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission
to reprint and distribute the President's article, "The
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities," as part of The New
Federalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint
and distribute the article, and I have no objection to your
plans to do SO.
You have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from
the President's article, and that you will submit the edited
version for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to
do this, and look forward to receiving your proposed
excerpt.
The New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am
pleased to learn of your plans to include the President's
article.
Sincerely,
Orig. signed by FFF
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Mr. Jack Barlow
4650 Arrow Highway
Suite D7
Montclair, CA 91763
FFF: JgR:aea 9/4/85
bcc: FFFielding
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
ID # 343999 CU
PR014.09
WHITE HOUSE
CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET
O OUTGOING
H INTERNAL
C O
JR-F
I . INCOMING
Date Correspondence
P
Received (YY/MM/DD)
/
Name of Correspondent:
Jack / Barlow from ORM
MI Mail Report
User Codes: (A)
(B)
(C)
Subject:
Draft persion of the President's article
u the Presidency : Roles and Besponsibilities
ROUTE TO:
ACTION
DISPOSITION
Tracking
Type
Completion
Action
Date
of
Date
Office/Agency
(Staff Name)
Code
YY/MM/DD
Response
Code
YY/MM/DD
Witalland
VVS
ORIGINATOR
85,11,01
C 85/11/06 20
Referral Note:
cent contact
WAT18
D
85,11,04
C 85/11/106
WE
Referral Note:
CUFIEL
S Silliob FF 85111106
Referral Note:
/
/
/
/
Referral Note:
/
/
/
/
-
Referral Note:
ACTION CODES:
DISPOSITION CODES:
A Appropriate Action
I Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary
A Answered
C Completed
C Comment/Recommendation
R. Direct Reply w/Copy
B - - Non-Special Referral
S Suspended
D Draft Response
S. For Signature
F - Furnish Fact Sheet
X Interim Reply
to be used as Enclosure
FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:
Type of Response = Initials of Signer
Code = "A"
Completion Date = Date of Outgoing
Comments:
Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.
Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).
Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files.
Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.
5/81
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
November 6, 1985
Dear Mr. Barlow:
Thank you for your letter of October 29. Along with that
letter you submitted an 800-word excerpt from the President's
article on the Presidency, which you propose to distribute
as part of the Bicentennial project of the New Federalist
Papers.
I have reviewed the excerpt and have no objection to it.
Thank you for your consideration in permitting us to review
the excerpt. Once again, best of luck with this exciting
project.
Sincerely,
Orig. signed by FFF
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Mr. Jack Barlow
480 N. Indian Hill Blvd.
Suite 2
Claremont, CA 91711
FFF:JGR:aea 11/6/85
CC: FFFielding
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
November 6, 1985
MEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING
FROM:
JOHN G. ROBERTS JJR
SUBJECT:
Draft Version of the President's Article
"The Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities"
We previously noted no objection to the proposal to publish
an 800-word excerpt from the President's article on the
Presidency as part of the New Federalist Papers series. The
editor of the series has now submitted the 800-word excerpt.
I have no objection to the excerpt.
Attachment
October 29, 1985
THE NEW
Mr. Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
FEDERALIST
The White House
PAPERS
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Fielding:
Editorial Advisors
Please forgive my delay in preparing a draft version of the
Francis Carlevan
Fordham University
President's article, "The Presidency: Roles and Responsibili-
ties," a copy of which I enclose. In cutting such a long article
Don E. Fehrer bacher
Stanford University
to 800-odd words, it was necessary to discard much good material;
what remains is the general treatment of the powers and duties of
Suzanne Garment
The was Street Josephan
the presidential office. I hope that this draft will meet your
approval. If there are particular things that in your opinion
Francis surland
The University of Charge
should be included in the article, please feel free to suggest
them; bearing in mind that the article is already somewhat over
Claremont Graduate
the word limit that National Forum has agreed to.
Anica
Evidenties
We plan to send the President's article to our list of some 2100
small, community newspapers, and we will be happy to forward
copies of the tearsheets we receive, if you wish to see them. We
would like to send the article out November 27, if that schedule
is not an inconvenience for you.
Again, we are very pleased that we can include the President's
article in our Bicentennial series. We are hopeful that the
series can have the effect of reminding Americans of the
principles of the Constitution's framers, and of the importance
of maintaining the institutions the framers created. The
President's article is an important contribution to that effort.
Sincerely,
PUBLIC RESEARCH.
SYNDICATED
4650 Arrow Highway
Suite D-7
Montclair. CAM1763
Jack Barlow
(714) 621-5831
Editor
885 words
THE PRESIDENCY: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
by Ronald W. Reagan
For nearly 200 years, the Constitution has endured with relatively few
amendments as a blueprint for freedom. In commemorating the Bicentennial of the
Constitution we celebrate not simply the historic event that took place in
Philadelphia on September 17, 1787, but the process by which we govern ourselves
today. There is no better time than this Bicentennial period to refamiliarize
ourselves with the Constitution and rededicate ourselves to the values it
embodies.
The central challenge confronting the Framers of the Constitution was to
create a strong national government that would not threaten the liberties SO
recently won. The solution the Framers embraced was to diffuse the national
governmental authority. Power was to be shared among separate institutions --
the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary - in order that no single
branch could become so powerful as to threaten the liberties of the people. In
our study of the allocation of authority in the Constitution, it is important to
keep in mind the purpose of this allocation - nothing less than the preserva-
tion of liberty.
The Framers looked primarily to the president to provide the critical
element of "energy" in the government. The problem with the government of the
Articles of Confederation had been that it was "destitute of energy." The
Drafters of the Constitution redressed that problem by vesting "competent
powers" in the executive to lead the Nation.
The president's popular mandate justified this grant of authority. The
president and the vice president are the only officials in our government elec-
ted through a process involving all the voters. Only the president can claim to
speak for all the people, because, as Hamilton wrote, his selection looks "in
1
the first instance to an immediate act of the people of America." The office of
president has "a due dependence on the people, and a due responsibility."
Perhaps the most pervasive responsibility of the president is to adminster
the executive branch. The Framers were practical men who recognized, as
Hamilton wrote, "that the true test of a good government is its aptitude and
tendency to produce a good administration." The people look ultimately to the
president to ensure the efficient performance of duty by the millions of federal
employees scattred among the various departments and agencies.
The challenge confronting the modern presidency is to "produce a good
administration" when the federal establishment has grown so far beyond anything
the framers could have imagined. It is an amazing fact that there are more
federal employees today than people living in America when the Framers drafted
the Constitution. Perhaps President George Washington could play an active role
in supervising the details of the first administration, but it is now the
responsibility of his successors to create mechanisms for the control and
coordination of the executive branch.
The president has no more important responsibility under the Constitution
than the conduct of foreign affairs. The Framers recognized that of the two
democratic branches, only the executive could successfully conduct foreign
relations. Hamilton noted in his description of the executive that "Decision,
activity, secrecy, and dispatch will generally characterize the proceedings of
one man in a much more eminent degree than the proceedings of any greater
number," and John Jay -- himself one of our most successful early diplomats -
argued that "the President will find no difficulty to provide" those qualities,
though they were beyond the capability of a basically deliberative body such as
Congress.
Apart from executive functions, the Constitution accords the president a
significant role in the legislative process. The people have grown to expect
2
leadership from the president not only in executing the laws but also in
presenting a legislative program to Congress for consideration.
Perhaps the most prominent of the president's legislative powers is the
qualified veto power. This power is qualified in the sense that a bill returned
by the president with disapproval can nonetheless be enacted into law by a two-
thirds vote of both houses. The Framers accorded the president a veto power for
two reasons. First, they recognized the "propensity of the legislative depart-
ment to intrude upon the rights, and to absorb the powers, of the other depart-
ments" and provided the president a veto so that he could defend the preroga-
tives of his office. The second purpose of the veto was as "an additional
security against the enaction of improper laws."
The powers of the presidency are limited, and the president discharges
constitutional responsibilities in a system according other powers to the coor-
dinate branches of the legislature and the judiciary. The members of all three
branches take an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it is a monument not only
to the genius of the Framers but also to the statesmanship of those who have
held office under the Constitution that the system has worked as well as it has.
Presidents have learned advisors at their disposal, and they can consult
with Congress, but the difficult and potentially momentous decisions the Consti-
tution vests in the executive are, in the final analysis, the president's alone.
Our most tested president, Abraham Lincoln, announced a guide for making those
decisions that has yet to be bettered:
I desire so to conduct the affairs of this Administration
that if, at the end, when I come to lay down the reins of
power, I have lost every other friend on earth, I shall at
least have one friend left, and that friend shall be down inside
of me.
END-END-END
3
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 4, 1985
Dear Mr. Barlow:
Thank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission
to reprint and distribute the President's article, "The
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities," as part of The New
Federalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint
and distribute the article, and I have no objection to your
plans to do SO.
You have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from
the President's article, and that you will submit the edited
version for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to
do this, and look forward to receiving your proposed
excerpt.
The New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am
pleased to learn of your plans to include the President's
article.
Sincerely,
Orig. signed by FFF
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Mr. Jack Barlow
4650 Arrow Highway
Suite D7
Montclair, CA 91763
FFF: JgR:aea 9/4/85
bcc: FFFielding
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
343999cu
JV
PR014-09
To
THE NEW
FEDERALIST
September 16, 1985
PAPERS
Mr. Fred F. Fielding
COPY
Counsel to the President
Editorial Advisors:
The White House
Washington, D.C. 20500
from ORM
Francis Canavan
Fordham University
Don E. Fehrenbacher
Dear Mr. Fielding:
Stanford University
Suzanne Garment
Thank you for your letter of September 4, regarding
The Wall Street Journal
permission to reprint the President's article, "The
Philip Kurland
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities."
The University of Chicago
Leonard W Levi
I shall be forwarding an edited version of the article
Claremont Graduate School
within the next couple of weeks, for your approval. We
Rongair
are very pleased that we can include the President's
Twentien Century Furno
article in our bicentennial series.
With thanks for your interest in our project,
Sincerely,
tach Bulond
Jack Barlow
Editor
JB/ch
PUBLIC RESEARCH,
SYNDICATED
(714) 621-5831
4650 ARROW HIGHWA
SUITE D7
MONTCLAIR, CA 9176
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
Date
9.24.85
Suspense Date
MEMORANDUM FOR: John
FROM:
DIANNA G. HOLLAND
ACTION
Approved
Please handle/review
X
For your information then to Central Feles
For your recommendation
For the files
Please see me
Please prepare response for
signature
As we discussed
Return to me for filing
COMMENT
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 4, 1985
Dear Mr. Barlow:
Thank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission
to reprint and distribute the President's article, "The
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities," as part of The New
Federalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint
and distribute the article, and I have no objection to your
plans to do SO.
You have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from
the President's article, and that you will submit the edited
version for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to
do this, and look forward to receiving your proposed
excerpt.
The New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am
pleased to learn of your plans to include the President's
article.
Sincerely,
Orig. signed by FFF
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Mr. Jack Barlow
4650 Arrow Highway
Suite D7
Montclair, CA 91763
FFF: JgR:aea 9/4/85
bcc: FFFielding
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
343999
ID #
CU
WHITE HOUSE
PROMES
CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET
O . OUTGOING
H . INTERNAL
DR
I . INCOMING
Date Correspondence
Received (YY/MM/DD)
/
/
Name of Correspondent: Jack Barlow
P
DAI
MI Mail Report
User Codes: (A)
(B)
ORM
(C)
Subject: Request to reprent POTUS' article "The
Presidency: Roles d Responsibilities"
ROUTE TO:
ACTION
DISPOSITION
Tracking
Type
Completion
Action
Date
of
Date
Office/Agency
(Staff Name)
Code
YY/MM/DD
Response
Code
YY/MM/DD
WS
CUHOLE
ORIGINATOR 85,09,03
C 85,09,04
3
Referral Note:
Wet 18
D 85,09,04 PP
C 85,09,04
Referral Note:
CUFIEL
K 85,09,04
FF A 85,09,04
Referral Note:
/
/
/
/
Referral Note:
/
/
/
/
Referral Note:
ACTION CODES:
DISPOSITION CODES:
A . Appropriate Action
/ . Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary
A Answered
C Completed
C - Comment/Recommendation
R. Direct Reply w/Copy
B . Non-Special Referral
S Suspended
D Draft Response
S For Signature
F Furnish Fact Sheet
X Interim Reply
to be used as Enclosure
FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:
Type of Response = Initials of Signer
Code = "A"
Completion Date = Date of Outgoing
Comments:
Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.
Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).
Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files.
Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.
5/81
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 4, 1985
Dear Mr. Barlow:
Thank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission
to reprint and distribute the President's article, "The
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities," as part of The New
Federalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint
and distribute the article, and I have no objection to your
plans to do SO.
You have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from
the President's article, and that you will submit the edited
version for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to
do this, and look forward to receiving your proposed
excerpt.
The New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am
pleased to learn of your plans to include the President's
article.
Sincerely,
Orig. signed by FFF
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Mr. Jack Barlow
4650 Arrow Highway
Suite D7
Montclair, CA 91763
FFF:JgR:aea 9/4/85
bcc: FFFielding
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 4, 1985
MEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING
FROM:
JOHN G. ROBERTS J26
SUBJECT:
Request to Reprint President's Article:
"The Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities"
The Editor of The New Federalist Papers, a bicentennial
project of Public Research, Syndicated, has asked permission
to reprint and distribute an 800-word excerpt from the
President's article "The Presidency: Roles and Responsi-
bilities," which first appeared in the Fall 1984 National
Forum. The New Federalist Papers project provides articles
to newspapers across the country free of charge. Several
articles from the National Forum edition have already been
syndicated by The New Federalist Papers, including the Chief
Justice's and the Speaker's, not to mention Dr. Mark Cannon's.
Permission is not required to reprint the President's
article, since it was prepared in the course of his official
duties. 17 U.S.C. § 105. The attached reply notes that
permission is not required, and thanks the editor for
offering to let us approve their editing of the President's
article.
Attachment
August 28, 1985
THE NEW
Mr. Fred Fielding
FEDERALIST
Counsel to the President
The White House
PAPERS
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Fielding:
Editorial Advisors:
I write at the suggestion of Dr. Mark Cannon to request
Francis Canavan
Fordham University
permission to reprint President Reagan's article, "The
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities," from the Fall,
Don E. Fehrenbacher
Stanford University
1984 National Forum as part of The New Federalist Papers.
Suzanne Garment
The Wall Street Journal
The New Federalist Papers is the bicentennial project of
Public Research, Syndicated, and is supported in part by
Philip Kurland
The University of Chicago
a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities.
The project began in January of 1984. Each month we
Leonard W. Levy
Claremont Graduate School
syndicate six articles on constitutional themes to a
nationwide audience. Two articles a month are sent, free
Abigail Thernstram
Twentieth Century Fund
of charge, to more than two thousand small, community
newspapers. A weekly article is sent to some one hundred
daily papers. The articles examine the various
provisions of the Constitution, as well as its historical
roots, its political principles, and its meaning today.
A distinguished roster of authors has contributed to the
series, including Chief Justice Burger, former Attorney
General Smith, Civil Rights Commission Chairman Clarence
Pendleton, and former Senator Eugene McCarthy. From the
scholarly community, we have had articles from Henry
Steele Commager, Samuel Beer, Gordon S. Wood, Harry V.
Jaffa, and many others. We hope the President will be
willing to join this group.
PUBLIC RESEARCH,
SYNDICATED
180 Indian Hill Blvd
Dr. Cannon and the editors of National Forum have given
Suite 2
us their permission to excerpt and syndicate selected
Claremont, CA-91711
articles from the Fall, 1984 issue of National Forum, of
(714) 621-5831
which Dr. Cannon was guest editor. We have already
4650 ARROW HIGHWAY
syndicated articles by Dr. Cannon, Speaker of the House
SUITE
'Neill, and Chief Justice Burger, and we plan to use two
MONTCLAIR, CA 9176
or three more as well.
We would excerpt about 800 words from the President's
article; if we are given permission, we would plan to do
the preliminary editing here and send it to you for
approval. If, however, it would be preferable to have the
editing done by someone on the staff there, we would certainly be
open to such an arrangement. We offer an honorarium of $250.
Both the legislative and the judicial branches have been
represented in our series; I hope the President will be willing
to join in this public celebration of the Constitution's
bicentennial. If I can provide you with further information
about the project, or answer any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
tab Bulon5
Jack Barlow
Editor
CC: John Roberts
JB/wp
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
December 11, 1985
Dear Mr. Silver:
This is in response to your letter of December 2 to the
President. Along with that letter you sent a check for
$250.00 as payment for the President's article, "The
Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities." The article
first appeared in the Fall 1984 National Forum. This
office advised the editor of The New Federalist Papers
that permission was not required to reprint and distribute
the President's article.
Pursuant to established White House policy, the President
does not accept honoraria or payment for work of this
nature. Accordingly, we are returning your check.
Sincerely,
John G. Roberts
Associate Counsel to the President
Mr. Thomas B. Silver
President, Public Research
Syndicated
480 N. Indian Hill Boulevard
Suite 2
Claremont, CA 91711
ID #. 343999 CU
WHITE HOUSE
PR014-09
CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET
o - OUTGOING
g-duit
H - INTERNAL
I - INCOMING
Date Correspondence
Received (YY/MM/DD)
/
/
return
Name of Correspondent:
Jack Barlow
MI Mail Report
User Codes: (A)
(B)
(C)
Subject:
The Presidency Roles and Benjanaebeleties"
forwards sheek to POTUS for article
ROUTE TO:
ACTION
DISPOSITION
Tracking
Type
Completion
Action
Date
of
Date
Office/Agency
(Staff Name)
Code
YY/MM/DD
Response
Code
YY/MM/DD
CUItolland
ORIGINATOR 08511209
/
/
Referral Note:
CUAT18
R 851/21/0
CV 585112,20
Referral Note:
/ /
-
/
Referral Note:
/ /
/
/
Referral Note:
/ /
/
/
Referral Note:
ACTION CODES:
DISPOSITION CODES:
A Appropriate Action
I Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary
A Answered
C Completed
C Comment/Recommendation
R Direct Reply w/Copy
B - Non-Special Referral
S Suspended
D Draft Response
S For Signature
F Furnish Fact Sheet
X Interim Reply
to be used as Enclosure
FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:
Type of Response = Initials of Signer
Code = "A"
Completion Date = Date of Outgoing
Comments:
Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.
Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).
Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files.
Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.
5/81
ARCH - QUERY
001 NEW WITH FEDERALIST WITH PAPERS
J.R
3999CU
DOCUMENT=
1 OF
1
CTDATE = 850903
DDNUMP =
REDATE = 850904
OCDATE = 850828
SPDATE = 850904
AMF
= BARLOW
CVDATE = 850904
ECID
= 343999CU
TATE
= CA
PDATF
= 851113
= 91763
WS
CDATE
850828
CTYP
IBA
DIA
I
AFF
FRED FIELDING
CUFIEL
MR. JACK BARLOW
TLE
EDITOR
THE NEW FEDERALIST PAPERS
DR
MONTCLAIR
CA 91763
REET
4650 ARROW HIGHWAY
SUITE D7
BJECT
REQUEST TO REPRINT POTUS ARTICLE "THE
PRESIDENCY: ROLES AND PESPONSIBILITIES"
BCODF
PR014-09
PP001
BE003-04 FG001
PU
DCODF
4800 4620
CUHOLL ORG 850903 C 850904
CUAT18 RSD 850904 C 850904
CUFIEL RSR 850904 FF A 850904
CUHOLL ORG 851101 CONTINUING CORRESPONDENCE C 851106
CUAT18 RSD 851104 C 851106
CUFIEL RSS 851106 FF A 851106
MMENTS
SEP 16 85 JACK BARLOW THANK YOU LETTER TO
FRED FIELDING ATTACHED
601 * END OF DOCUMENTS IN LIST - ENTER RETURN OR ANOTHER COMMAND.
THE NEW
FEDERALIST
PAPERS
December 2, 1985
J. Jackson Banov
Edito
The Honorable Ronald W. Reagan
The White House
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear President Reagan:
Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $250.00
as payment for your article, "The Presidency: Roles
and Responsibilities."
Thank you for your contribution to Public Research,
Syndicated.
Sincerely,
using
Thomas B. Silver
President
TBS:jp
Enclosure Check #3460
PUBLIC RESEARCH,
SYNDICATED
4650 Arrow Highway
Suite D-7
.
Montclair, CA 91763
(714) 621-5831
WITHDRAWAL SHEET
Ronald Reagan Library
Collection Name
Withdrawer
ROBERTS, JOHN: FILES
RB 8/3/2005
W
File Folder
FOIA
JGR/ARTICLE ON THE PRESIDENCY, NATIONAL FORUM (7
F05-139/01
OF 7)
COOK
Box Number
6RW
DOC Document Type
No of Doc Date Restric-
NO
Document Description
pages
tions
1
CHECK
1 11/21/1985 B6
439
PERSONAL CHECK
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
B-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
B-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
B-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
B-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
B-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
E.O. 13233
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift.
Page data
- Page
- 1
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- c0bffdddb06d60f9
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 118567582
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "118567582",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567582",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "JGR/Article on the Presidency, National Forum (7 of 7)",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567582",
"identifierLocal": "485",
"collections": [
"Records of the Office of Counsel to the President (Reagan Administration)",
"John Roberts' Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-004-016-2017.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-004-016-2017.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-004-016-2017.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "118567582",
"label": "JGR/Article on the Presidency, National Forum (7 of 7)",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567582"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "118567582",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567582",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "JGR/Article on the Presidency, National Forum (7 of 7)",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567582",
"identifierLocal": "485",
"collections": [
"Records of the Office of Counsel to the President (Reagan Administration)",
"John Roberts' Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-004-016-2017.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-004-016-2017.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-004-016-2017.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118567582",
"naId": 118567582,
"coverageEndDate": {
"logicalDate": "1986-12-31",
"year": 1986
},
"coverageStartDate": {
"logicalDate": "1982-01-01",
"year": 1982
},
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 1,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-004-016-2017.pdf",
"mediaId": "c0bffdddb06d60f9",
"ocrText": "Ronald Reagan Presidential Library\nDigital Library Collections\nThis is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections.\nCollection: Roberts, John G.: Files\nFolder Title: JGR/Article on the Presidency,\nNational Forum (7 of 7)\nBox: 4\nTo see more digitized collections visit:\nhttps://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library\nTo see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:\nhttps://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection\nContact a reference archivist at: [email protected]\nCitation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing\nNational Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/\nWITHDRAWAL SHEET\nRonald Reagan Library\nCollection Name ROBERTS, JOHN: FILES\nWithdrawer\nRBW\n8/3/2005\nFile Folder\nJGR/ARTICLE ON THE PRESIDENCY, NATIONAL\nFOIA\nFORUM (7 OF 7)\nF05-139/01\nBox Number\nCOOK\n6RW\nDOC Doc Type\nDocument Description\nNo of Doc Date Restrictions\nNO\nPages\n1\nCHECK\nPERSONAL CHECK\n1 11/21/1985\nB6\n439\nFreedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]\nB-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]\nB-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]\nB-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]\nB-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]\nB-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]\nB-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]\nB-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]\nB-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]\nE.O. 13233\nC. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift.\nAugust 28, 1985\nMr. John Roberts\nTHE NEW\nAssociate Counsel to the President\nFEDERALIST\nRoom 106, EOB\nPAPERS\nThe White House\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nDear Mr. Roberts:\nEnclosed is a copy of my letter of this date to\nMr. Fielding, requesting permission to reprint the\nPresident's article, \"The Presidency: Roles and\nResponsibilities\" from the Fall, 1984 issue of National\nForum. I hope the President will give his permission\nfor us to use an excerpt from his article, and I\nwould be very grateful for your assistance in this\nmatter.\nSincerely,\nJack Barlow\nEditor\nPUBLIC RESEARCH,\nSYNDICATED\n480 N. Indian +ill Blvd\nSuite\nClarement, CA 91711\n(714) 621-5831\nAugust 28, 1985\nTHE NEW\nMr. Fred Fielding\nFEDERALIST\nCounsel to the President\nPAPERS\nThe White House\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nDear Mr. Fielding:\nEditorial Advisors:\nFrancis Canavan\nI write at the suggestion of Dr. Mark Cannon to request\nFordham University\npermission to reprint President Reagan's article, \"The\nDon E. Fehrenbacher\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities,\" from the Fall,\nStanford University\n1984 National Forum as part of The New Federalist Papers.\nSuzanne Garment\nThe Wall Street Journal\nThe New Federalist Papers is the bicentennial project of\nPhilip Kurland\nPublic Research, Syndicated, and is supported in part by\nThe University of Chicago\na grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities.\nLeonard W. Levy\nThe project began in January of 1984. Each month we\nClaremont Graduate School\nsyndicate six articles on constitutional themes to a\nAbigail Thernstrom\nnationwide audience. Two articles a month are sent, free\nTwentieth Century Fund\nof charge, to more than two thousand small, community\nnewspapers. A weekly article is sent to some one hundred\ndaily papers. The articles examine the various\nprovisions of the Constitution, as well as its historical\nroots, its political principles, and its meaning today.\nA distinguished roster of authors has contributed to the\nseries, including Chief Justice Burger, former Attorney\nGeneral Smith, Civil Rights Commission Chairman Clarence\nPendleton, and former Senator Eugene McCarthy. From the\nscholarly community, we have had articles from Henry\nSteele Commager, Samuel Beer, Gordon S. Wood, Harry V.\nJaffa, and many others. We hope the President will be\nwilling to join this group.\nPUBLIC RESEARCH,\nSYNDICATED\n480 N Indian Hill Blvd\nDr. Cannon and the editors of National Forum have given\nSuite\nus their permission to excerpt and syndicate selected\nClaremont, CA-91711\narticles from the Fall, 1984 issue of National Forum, of\n(714) 621-5831\nwhich Dr. Cannon was guest editor. We have already\n4650 ARROW HIGHWA\nsyndicated articles by Dr. Cannon, Speaker of the House\nSUITE D7\nO'Neill, and Chief Justice Burger, and we plan to use two\nMONTCLAIR, CA 9176\nor three more as well.\nWe would excerpt about 800 words from the President's\narticle; if we are given permission, we would plan to do\nthe preliminary editing here and send it to you for\napproval. If, however, it would be preferable to have the\nediting done by someone on the staff there, we would certainly be\nopen to such an arrangement. We offer an honorarium of $250.\nBoth the legislative and the judicial branches have been\nrepresented in our series; I hope the President will be willing\nto join in this public celebration of the Constitution's\nbicentennial. If I can provide you with further information\nabout the project, or answer any questions, please call me.\nSincerely,\ntab Bulon\nJack Barlow\nEditor\nCC: John Roberts\nJB/wp\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nSeptember 4, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING\nFROM:\nJOHN G. ROBERTS 926\nSUBJECT:\nRequest to Reprint President's Article:\n\"The Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities\"\nThe Editor of The New Federalist Papers, a bicentennial\nproject of Public Research, Syndicated, has asked permission\nto reprint and distribute an 800-word excerpt from the\nPresident's article \"The Presidency: Roles and Responsi-\nbilities,\" which first appeared in the Fall 1984 National\nForum. The New Federalist Papers project provides articles\nto newspapers across the country free of charge. Several\narticles from the National Forum edition have already been\nsyndicated by The New Federalist Papers, including the Chief\nJustice's and the Speaker's, not to mention Dr. Mark Cannon's.\nPermission is not required to reprint the President's\narticle, since it was prepared in the course of his official\nduties. 17 U.S.C. § 105. The attached reply notes that\npermission is not required, and thanks the editor for\noffering to let us approve their editing of the President's\narticle.\nAttachment\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nSeptember 4, 1985\nDear Mr. Barlow:\nThank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission\nto reprint and distribute the President's article, \"The\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities,\" as part of The New\nFederalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint\nand distribute the article, and I have no objection to your\nplans to do SO.\nYou have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from\nthe President's article, and that you will submit the edited\nversion for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to\ndo this, and look forward to receiving your proposed\nexcerpt.\nThe New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am\npleased to learn of your plans to include the President's\narticle.\nSincerely,\nOrig. signed by FFF\nFred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nMr. Jack Barlow\n4650 Arrow Highway\nSuite D7\nMontclair, CA 91763\nFFF:JgR:aea 9/4/85\nbcc: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nSeptember 4, 1985\nDear Mr. Barlow:\nThank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission\nto reprint and distribute the President's article, \"The\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities,\" as part of The New\nFederalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint\nand distribute the article, and I have no objection to your\nplans to do SO.\nYou have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from\nthe President's article, and that you will submit the edited\nversion for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to\ndo this, and look forward to receiving your proposed\nexcerpt.\nThe New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am\npleased to learn of your plans to include the President's\narticle.\nSincerely,\nFred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nMr. Jack Barlow\n4650 Arrow Highway\nSuite D7\nMontclair, CA 91763\nFFF: JgR:aea 9/4/85\nbcc: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\n343999\nID #\nCU\nJV\nWHITE HOUSE\nPRO1409\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\no . OUTGOING\nH . INTERNAL\nR\nI . INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nName of Correspondent: / Jack Barlaw\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(c)\nSubject: Request to reprent POTUS' article \"The\nPresidency Roles & Responsibilities\"\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency\n(Staff Name)\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nCurture\n85,09,03\nWS\nORIGINATOR\n/ /\nReferral Note:\ncunt 18\nD\n85,09,04 WS\n5 85 109114\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/ /\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/ /\n-\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/\n/\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES:\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA * Appropriate Action\nI - Into Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA Answered\nC Completed\nC . Comment/Recommendation\nR Direct Reply w/Copy\nB . Non-Special Referral\nS Suspended\nD Draft Response\nS For Signature\nF - Furnish Fact Sheet\nX - Interim Reply\nto be used as Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:\nType of Response = Initials of Signer\nCode = \"A\"\nCompletion Date = Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\n3₫3999\ngust 28, 1985\nTHE NEW\n:. Fred Fielding\nFEDERALIST\nounsel to the President\nPAPERS\nhe White House\nashington, D.C. 20500\nDear Mr. Fielding:\nEditorial Advisors:\nFrancis Canavan\nI write at the suggestion of Dr. Mark Cannon to request\nFordham University\npermission to reprint President Reagan's article, \"The\nDon E. Fehrenbacher\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities,\" from the Fall,\nStanford University\n1984 National Forum as part of The New Federalist Papers.\nSuzanne Garment\nThe Wall Street Journal\nThe New Federalist Papers is the bicentennial project of\nPhilip Kurland\nPublic Research, Syndicated, and is supported in part by\nThe University of Chicago\na grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities.\nLeonard W. Levy\nThe project began in January of 1984. Each month we\nCláremont Graduate School\nsyndicate six articles on constitutional themes to a\nAbigal Themstrem\nnationwide audience. Two articles a month are sent, free\nTwentieth Century Fund\nof charge, to more than two thousand small, community\nnewspapers. A weekly article is sent to some one hundred\ndaily papers. The articles examine the various\nprovisions of the Constitution, as well as its historical\nroots, its political principles, and its meaning today.\nA distinguished roster of authors has contributed to the\nseries, including Chief Justice Burger, former Attorney\nGeneral Smith, Civil Rights Commission Chairman Clarence\nPendleton, and former Senator Eugene McCarthy. From the\nscholarly community, we have had articles from Henry\nSteele Commager, Samuel Beer, Gordon S. Wood, Harry V.\nJaffa, and many others. We hope the President will be\nwilling to join this group.\nPUBLIC RESEARCH,\nSYNDICATED\n180 N. Indian ++++ Blvd\nDr. Cannon and the editors of National Forum have given\nSuite 2\nus their permission to excerpt and syndicate selected\nClaremont, CA\narticles from the Fall, 1984 issue of National Forum, of\n(714) 621-5831\nwhich Dr. Cannon was guest editor. We have already\n4650 ARBOW HIGHWA\nsyndicated articles by Dr. Cannon, Speaker of the House\nSUITE\nO'Neill, and Chief Justice Burger, and we plan to use two\nMONTCLAIR, CA 917\nor three more as well.\nWe would excerpt about 800 words from the President's\narticle; if we are given permission, we would plan to do\nthe preliminary editing here and send it to you for\napproval. If, however, it would be preferable to have the\nediting done by someone on the staff there, we would certainly be\nopen to such an arrangement. We offer an honorarium of $250.\nBoth the legislative and the judicial branches have been\nrepresented in our series; I hope the President will be willing\nto join in this public celebration of the Constitution's\nbicentennial. If I can provide you with further information\nabout the project, or answer any questions, please call me.\nSincerely,\ntab Bulow\nJack Barlow\nEditor\nCC: John Roberts\nJB/wp\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nOctober 18, 1985\nDear Professor Daug Kmiec:\nThank you for your recent note transmitting a copy of the\nissue of the Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy\ndevoted to the line-item veto. As you know, the President\nhas long supported a constitutional amendment to provide\nthis power to the Chief Executive.\nAs the President explained in an article on the Presidency\nfor the issue of National Forum devoted to the Bicentennial\nof the Constitution, granting such power to the Chief\nExecutive would not alter the constitutional balance but in\nfact restore the Framers' original design. In return for\nyour sending along a copy of the Journal, I have taken the\nliberty of enclosing a copy of the National Forum issue\ncontaining this article.\nThank you again for the Journal issue, which I am certain\nwill be helpful to those at the White House most actively\ninvolved with this timely topic.\nWith best wishes,\nSincerely,\nOrig. signed by FFF\nFred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nProfessor Douglas W. Kmiec\nNotre Dame Law School\nNotre Dame, IN 46556\nFFF:JGR:aea 10/18/85\ncc: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nOctober 22, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR WILLIAM MARTIN\nEXECUTIVE SECRETARY\nNATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL\nFROM:\nJOHN G. ROBERTS\nASSOCIATE COUNSEL THE PRESIDENT\nSUBJECT:\nPresidential Article\nfor The Times (of London)\nCounsel's Office has reviewed the above-referenced\nPresidential article, and finds no objection to it\nfrom a legal perspective.\nCC: David L. Chew\nID #\nCU\nWHITE HOUSE\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\n0 . OUTGOING\nH . INTERNAL\nI - INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n/ /\nD chew\nName of Correspondent:\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\nSubject: Presidential article far The Times (af Conclon\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency\n(Staff Name)\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\ncultace\nORIGINATOR 85,10,22\n/ /\nReferral Note:\nwas 18\nR 85,10,22\n5 85,10,22\nReferral Note:\n4pm\n/ /\n/ /\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/ /\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/\n/\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES:\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA - Appropriate Action\nI Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA Answered\nC Completed\nC Comment/Recommendation-\nR. Direct Reply w/Copy\nB - Non-Special Referral\nS Suspended\nD Draft Response\nS For Signature\nF Furnish Fact Sheet\nX Interim Reply\nto be used as Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:\nType of Response = Initials of Signer\nCode\n\"A\"\nCompletion-Date Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\nDocument No.\nWHITE HOUSE STAFFING MEMORANDUM\nDATE: 10/21/85\nACTION/CONCURRENCE/COMMENT DUE BY: 10/22/85, 4:00 p.m.\nSUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL ARTICLE FOR THE TIMES (OF LONDON)\nACTION FYI\nACTION FYI\nVICE PRESIDENT\nLACY\nREGAN\nMcFARLANE\nMILLER\nOGLESBY\nBUCHANAN\nRYAN\nCHAVEZ\nSPEAKES\nCHEW\nP\nSS SPRINKEL\nDANIELS\nSVAHN\nFIELDING\nTHOMAS\nFRIEDERSDORF\nTUTTLE\nHENKEL\nHICKEY\nHICKS\nKINGON\nREMARKS:\nPlease submit your comments, edits or recommendations directly to\nBill Martin of the NSC with an info copy to my office by 4:00 p.m.\nTOMORROW. Thank you.\nRESPONSE:\nDavid L. Chew\nStaff Secretary\nExt. 2702\n8390\nNATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL\nWASHINGTON. D.C. 20506\nOctober 21, 1985\nHas shot turnes.\nMEMORANDUM FOR DAVID L. CHEW\nTx. Brt\nFROM:\nWILLIAM F. MARTIN WISE\nSUBJECT:\nPresidential Article for The Times (of London)\nAttached is an NSC-approved article, to be signed by the President,\nfor submission to The Times (of London) for inclusion in a\nSpecial Supplement commemorating The Times' 200th anniversary.\nThe Times has asked various Heads of State to submit 850-word\narticles on their vision for their own country in the year 2000.\nPlease circulate to appropriate members of the White House staff\nfor clearance and return comments to the NSC, as this article\nmust be submitted to the Washington office of The Times by\nTuesday afternoon, October 22.\nMany thanks.\nAttachments\nTAB A\nProposed Presidential article\nTAB B\nIncoming letter from The Times\nThe daily press of events often leaves one little time to\nreflect on the future, so I welcome The Times' invitation to\nwrite about my vision of America in the year 2000. It is\nappropriate that I do so in the pages of the oldest daily\nnewspaper in the world, a symbol of freedom older than our own\nConstitution.\nUnlike most nations, the United States was founded on a\nvision. We see our history as a constant striving toward the\nvision set down in our Declaration of Independence and\nConstitution. That vision is of a nation where every person,\nregardless of background or beliefs. is free to realize his or\nher full potential. spiritual and material. America was\nfounded the principle that freedom and progress should not\nbe the preserve of the lucky few, but the universal right of\nall.\nI see an America in the year 2000 which has made further\nprogress toward realizing the noble vision. All Americans\ntoday have the freedom to think and worship as they please.\nThe vast majority have the freedom to find fulfillment in their\nwork, in their quality of life, and with their loved ones.\n-2-\nWe will not be satisfied until every American knows this\nfreedom. The remaining barriers to self-fulfillment are\nlargely economic in nature, so economic growth is the key to\nfuture opportunity. This growth depends on keeping government\nout of the way of human talent and initiative. Where people\nare free to pursue their ideas and dreams, prosperity and\nopportunity are the rule. Where government becomes the\npeople's master, rather than their servant, creativity is\nstifled and progress impeded. In the past four and a half\nyears, with policies trusting to the people, America has\nrestored its economic vigor; we have created 8 million new jobs\nin the past three years. Government has an essential role to\nplay, but there can no longer be any doubt that the true source\nof economic growth is the individual, not the state.\nIf we stick by this truth, the opportunity for fulfillment\nthat most Americans know today can be available to even more by\nthe year 2000. My vision is one where poverty will be greatly\nreduced. We will have succeeded in tearing down completely the\nwalls of intolerance that once divided our citizens.\nTechnology will be making unprecedented advances in spreading\nknowledge and facilitating human comfort; science will have\nimmeasurably enhanced life and, I pray, found a cure for cancer\nand other dread diseases.\n-3-\nIf other nations follow the path of economic freedom, and\nuphold a system of free and fair trade, then more rapid\neconomic growth will surge throughout the world. Expanding\nopportunity will be an international phenomenon. And the more\nadvanced nations will be able to be more generous in helping\nthose nations in need. The gap between developed and\ndeveloping nations will narrow; indeed, many of the latter will\njoin the ranks of the former.\nThe exercise of freedom presupposes peace. I pray that as\nwe look back from the year 2000, we will be able to contrast\nwith the horrors of the first half of the century, the relative\npeace of the second half. I do not expect the stark\ndifferences between the democracies and the totalitarian\ncountries to have vanished, so I see an America and a Western\nalliance that have maintained their strength and resolve such\nthat no aggressor could have thought he could gain from war.\nIf we do this, my prayer will be met.\nThe United States will continue to rely on deterrence to\nkeep the peace, but it will be a safer, more stable kind of\ndeterrence than today's. Rather than rely solely on the threat\nof retaliation -- of avenging lives lost -- it will be based\nmore on the ability to defend human lives against nuclear\nattack. Our Strategic Defense Initiative is a research\nprogram, so I cannot predict at what stage we will find\nourselves in 2000.\n-4-\nI am an optimist, however, and I have to believe the same scientific\nand engineering genius that invented the steam engine and sent a\nman to the moon will find ways to make feasible defenses against\nballistic missiles, defenses that are survivable against counter-\nmeasures and are cost-effective. If the Soviet Union sees the\npotential of such defenses in its own research program, as I\nbelieve it will, perhaps it will agree with us on a cooperative\ntransition to a system of deterrence based on a stable balance of\ndefense and offense -- at sharply lower levels of offensive\nforces than today. Such an outcome would enable us to move some\ntime in the next century toward the complete elimination of\nnuclear weapons. A strong conventional deterrent would, however,\nremain vital.\nContinued Western resolve could lead to the most hopeful\ndevelopment of all. Frustrated in its expansionist aims, and\nrecognizing the imperatives for change at home, the Soviet Union\ncould agree with us to turn our competition away from armaments\nto competition in benefiting mankind. We are not afraid of such\na competition. Is Mr. Gorbachev? I call on him to join us,\ntoday, in this new context. Mankind would then be able to look\ntoward the new century, the third millennium of the modern era,\nwith an optimism and hope justified as never before.\nTHE TIMES\nTimes Newspapers Limited P.O. Box 7.\n200 Gray's Inn Road. London WCI X 8EZ (registered office)\nTelephone 01-837 1234 Telex 264971 Registered no. 894646 England\nAH\nFrom the Editor\nKamael\nSeptember 25, 1985\nPresident Ronald Reagan,\nThe White House,\n1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,\nWashington DC 20500,\nU.S.A.\nDear Mr. President,\nAs you know, The Times is celebrating its\nbicentenary this year and in the course of the year\nwe have carried a number of bicentenary Special Reports\non those major countries of the world with which we\nhave had a close and continuous relationship during\nthe 200 years. In each case we have invited the Head\nof State to contribute to our Report with a short\narticle of 850 words. The theme of this article\nwould be your vision for the United States in the\nyear 2000 and we would need the article by October 21.\nI know how busy you are, Mr. President, but I\ndo hope you would be able to find time to enhance\nthis paper's coverage of the United States past and\nfuture as you would surely do with an article of that\nkind.\nYours sincerely,\nAome\nCharles Douglas-Home\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nNovember 6, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING\nFROM:\nJOHN G. ROBERTS $22\nSUBJECT:\nDraft Version of the President's Article\n\"The Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities\"\nWe previously noted no objection to the proposal to publish\nan 800-word excerpt from the President's article on the\nPresidency as part of the New Federalist Papers series. The\neditor of the series has now submitted the 800-word excerpt.\nI have no objection to the excerpt.\nAttachment\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nNovember 6, 1985\nDear Mr. Barlow:\nThank you for your letter of October 29. Along with that\nletter you submitted an 800-word excerpt from the President's\narticle on the Presidency, which you propose to distribute\nas part of the Bicentennial project of the New Federalist\nPapers.\nI have reviewed the excerpt and have no objection to it.\nThank you for your consideration in permitting us to review\nthe excerpt. Once again, best of luck with this exciting\nproject.\nSincerely,\nOrig. signed by FFF\nFred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nMr. Jack Barlow\n480 N. Indian Hill Blvd.\nSuite 2\nClaremont, CA 91711\nFFF: JGR:aea 11/6/85\nCC: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nNovember 6, 1985\nDear Mr. Barlow:\nThank you for your letter of October 29. Along with that\nletter you submitted an 800-word excerpt from the President's\narticle on the Presidency, which you propose to distribute\nas part of the Bicentennial project of the New Federalist\nPapers.\nI have reviewed the excerpt and have no objection to it.\nThank you for your consideration in permitting us to review\nthe excerpt. Once again, best of luck with this exciting\nproject.\nSincerely,\nFred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nMr. Jack Barlow\n480 N. Indian Hill Blvd.\nSuite 2\nClaremont, CA 91711\nFFF:JGR:aea 11/6/85\nCC: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\nID #. 343999 CU\nWHITE HOUSE\nPRO14.09\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\no * OUTGOING\nH . INTERNAL\nM-F\nI . INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n/\n/\nName of Correspondent:\nJack Barlow\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\nSubject:\nDraft persion of the Presidents article\nu Cine Presidency : Roles and Responsibilities 4\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nOffice/Agency\nof\n(Staff Name)\nDate\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nWitalland\nWS\nORIGINATOR 85,11,01\n/ /\nReferral Note:\nWAT18\ncont corresp\nD 85,11,04\n58511114\nWS\nReferral Note:\n/ /\nI\n/ /\nReferral Note:\n/ /\nI\n/ /\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n.\n-\n/ /\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES:\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA Appropriate Action\nI - Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nC Comment/Recommendation\nA Answered\nC Completed\nR - Direct Reply w/Copy\nD Draft Response\nB Non-Special Referral\nS Suspended\nS For Signature\nF Furnish Fact Sheet\nX Interim Reply\nto be used as Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:\nType of Response = Initials of Signer\nCode\nII\n\"A\"\nCompletion Date = Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\nOctober 29, 1985\nTHE NEW\nMr. Fred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nFEDERALIST\nThe White House\nPAPERS\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nDear Mr. Fielding:\nPlease forgive my delay in preparing a draft version of the\nFLATICIAL\nFordham Uraversity\nPresident's article, \"The Presidency: Roles and Responsibili-\nties,\" a copy of which I enclose. In cutting such a long article\nDon $\nStantord\nto 800-odd words, it was necessary to discard much good material;\nwhat remains is the general treatment of the powers and duties of\nSuzarine Garmen\nThe Wall street JOHN\nthe presidential office. I hope that this draft will meet your\napproval. If there are particular things that in your opinion\nPruso NUMBER\nThe University of\nshould be included in the article, please feel free to suggest\nthem; bearing in mind that the article is already somewhat over\nLennard VV Life\nClaremont Graguate some\nthe word limit that National Forum has agreed to.\nADIDAS\nTwentieth Century Fune\nWe plan to send the President's article to our list of some 2100\nsmall, community newspapers, and we will be happy to forward\ncopies of the tearsheets we receive, if you wish to see them. We\nwould like to send the article out November 27, if that schedule\nis not an inconvenience for you.\nAgain, we are very pleased that we can include the President's\narticle in our Bicentennial series. We are hopeful that the\nseries can have the effect of reminding Americans of the\nprinciples of the Constitution's framers, and of the importance\nof maintaining the institutions the framers created. The\nPresident's article is an important contribution to that effort.\nSincerely,\nPUBLIC RESEARCH,\ntab Banlow\nSYNDICATED\n4650 Arrow Highway\nSuite D-7\nMontclair, CA 91763\nJack Barlow\n(714) 621-5831\nEditor\n885 words\nTHE PRESIDENCY: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES\nby Ronald W. Reagan\nFor nearly 200 years, the Constitution has endured with relatively few\namendments as a blueprint for freedom. In commemorating the Bicentennial of the\nConstitution we celebrate not simply the historic event that took place in\nPhiladelphia on September 17, 1787, but the process by which we govern ourselves\ntoday. There is no better time than this Bicentennial period to refamiliarize\nourselves with the Constitution and rededicate ourselves to the values it\nembodies.\nThe central challenge confronting the Framers of the Constitution was to\ncreate a strong national government that would not threaten the liberties so\nrecently won. The solution the Framers embraced was to diffuse the national\ngovernmental authority. Power was to be shared among separate institutions --\nthe legislature, the executive, and the judiciary - in order that no single\nbranch could become so powerful as to threaten the liberties of the people. In\nour study of the allocation of authority in the Constitution, it is important to\nkeep in mind the purpose of this allocation -- nothing less than the preserva-\ntion of liberty.\nThe Framers looked primarily to the president to provide the critical\nelement of \"energy\" in the government. The problem with the government of the\nArticles of Confederation had been that it was \"destitute of energy.\" The\nDrafters of the Constitution redressed that problem by vesting \"competent\npowers\" in the executive to lead the Nation.\nThe president's popular mandate justified this grant of authority. The\npresident and the vice president are the only officials in our government elec-\nted through a process involving all the voters. Only the president can claim to\nspeak for all the people, because, as Hamilton wrote, his selection looks \"in\n1\nthe first instance to an immediate act of the people of America.\" The office of\npresident has \"a due dependence on the people, and a due responsibility.\"\nPerhaps the most pervasive responsibility of the president is to adminster\nthe executive branch. The Framers were practical men who recognized, as\nHamilton wrote, \"that the true test of a good government is its aptitude and\ntendency to produce a good administration.\" The people look ultimately to the\npresident to ensure the efficient performance of duty by the millions of federal\nemployees scattred among the various departments and agencies.\nThe challenge confronting the modern presidency is to \"produce a good\nadministration\" when the federal establishment has grown so far beyond anything\nthe framers could have imagined. It is an amazing fact that there are more\nfederal employees today than people living in America when the Framers drafted\nthe Constitution. Perhaps President George Washington could play an active role\nin supervising the details of the first administration, but it is now the\nresponsibility of his successors to create mechanisms for the control and\ncoordination of the executive branch.\nThe president has no more important responsibility under the Constitution\nthan the conduct of foreign affairs. The Framers recognized that of the two\ndemocratic branches, only the executive could successfully conduct foreign\nrelations. Hamilton noted in his description of the executive that \"Decision,\nactivity, secrecy, and dispatch will generally characterize the proceedings of\none man in a much more eminent degree than the proceedings of any greater\nnumber,\" and John Jay --- himself one of our most successful early diplomats -\nargued that \"the President will find no difficulty to provide\" those qualities,\nthough they were beyond the capability of a basically deliberative body such as\nCongress.\nApart from executive functions, the Constitution accords the president a\nsignificant role in the legislative process. The people have grown to expect\n2\nleadership from the president not only in executing the laws but also in\npresenting a legislative program to Congress for consideration.\nPerhaps the most prominent of the president's legislative powers is the\nqualified veto power. This power is qualified in the sense that a bill returned\nby the president with disapproval can nonetheless be enacted into law by a two-\nthirds vote of both houses. The Framers accorded the president a veto power for\ntwo reasons. First, they recognized the \"propensity of the legislative depart-\nment to intrude upon the rights, and to absorb the powers, of the other depart-\nments\" and provided the president a veto so that he could defend the preroga-\ntives of his office. The second purpose of the veto was as \"an additional\nsecurity against the enaction of improper laws.\"\nThe powers of the presidency are limited, and the president discharges\nconstitutional responsibilities in a system according other powers to the coor-\ndinate branches of the legislature and the judiciary. The members of all three\nbranches take an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it is a monument not only\nto the genius of the Framers but also to the statesmanship of those who have\nheld office under the Constitution that the system has worked as well as it has.\nPresidents have learned advisors at their disposal, and they can consult\nwith Congress, but the difficult and potentially momentous decisions the Consti-\ntution vests in the executive are, in the final analysis, the president's alone.\nOur most tested president, Abraham Lincoln, announced a guide for making those\ndecisions that has yet to be bettered:\nI desire so to conduct the affairs of this Administration\nthat if, at the end, when I come to lay down the reins of\npower, I have lost every other friend on earth, I shall at\nleast have one friend left, and that friend shall be down inside\nof me.\nEND-END-END\n3\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nSeptember 4, 1985\nDear Mr. Barlow:\nThank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission\nto reprint and distribute the President's article, \"The\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities,\" as part of The New\nFederalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint\nand distribute the article, and I have no objection to your\nplans to do SO.\nYou have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from\nthe President's article, and that you will submit the edited\nversion for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to\ndo this, and look forward to receiving your proposed\nexcerpt.\nThe New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am\npleased to learn of your plans to include the President's\narticle.\nSincerely,\nOrig. signed by FFF\nFred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nMr. Jack Barlow\n4650 Arrow Highway\nSuite D7\nMontclair, CA 91763\nFFF: JgR:aea 9/4/85\nbcc: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\nID # 343999 CU\nPR014.09\nWHITE HOUSE\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\nO OUTGOING\nH INTERNAL\nC O\nJR-F\nI . INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nP\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n/\nName of Correspondent:\nJack / Barlow from ORM\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\nSubject:\nDraft persion of the President's article\nu the Presidency : Roles and Besponsibilities\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency\n(Staff Name)\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nWitalland\nVVS\nORIGINATOR\n85,11,01\nC 85/11/06 20\nReferral Note:\ncent contact\nWAT18\nD\n85,11,04\nC 85/11/106\nWE\nReferral Note:\nCUFIEL\nS Silliob FF 85111106\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/\n/\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/\n/\n-\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES:\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA Appropriate Action\nI Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA Answered\nC Completed\nC Comment/Recommendation\nR. Direct Reply w/Copy\nB - - Non-Special Referral\nS Suspended\nD Draft Response\nS. For Signature\nF - Furnish Fact Sheet\nX Interim Reply\nto be used as Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:\nType of Response = Initials of Signer\nCode = \"A\"\nCompletion Date = Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nNovember 6, 1985\nDear Mr. Barlow:\nThank you for your letter of October 29. Along with that\nletter you submitted an 800-word excerpt from the President's\narticle on the Presidency, which you propose to distribute\nas part of the Bicentennial project of the New Federalist\nPapers.\nI have reviewed the excerpt and have no objection to it.\nThank you for your consideration in permitting us to review\nthe excerpt. Once again, best of luck with this exciting\nproject.\nSincerely,\nOrig. signed by FFF\nFred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nMr. Jack Barlow\n480 N. Indian Hill Blvd.\nSuite 2\nClaremont, CA 91711\nFFF:JGR:aea 11/6/85\nCC: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nNovember 6, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING\nFROM:\nJOHN G. ROBERTS JJR\nSUBJECT:\nDraft Version of the President's Article\n\"The Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities\"\nWe previously noted no objection to the proposal to publish\nan 800-word excerpt from the President's article on the\nPresidency as part of the New Federalist Papers series. The\neditor of the series has now submitted the 800-word excerpt.\nI have no objection to the excerpt.\nAttachment\nOctober 29, 1985\nTHE NEW\nMr. Fred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nFEDERALIST\nThe White House\nPAPERS\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nDear Mr. Fielding:\nEditorial Advisors\nPlease forgive my delay in preparing a draft version of the\nFrancis Carlevan\nFordham University\nPresident's article, \"The Presidency: Roles and Responsibili-\nties,\" a copy of which I enclose. In cutting such a long article\nDon E. Fehrer bacher\nStanford University\nto 800-odd words, it was necessary to discard much good material;\nwhat remains is the general treatment of the powers and duties of\nSuzanne Garment\nThe was Street Josephan\nthe presidential office. I hope that this draft will meet your\napproval. If there are particular things that in your opinion\nFrancis surland\nThe University of Charge\nshould be included in the article, please feel free to suggest\nthem; bearing in mind that the article is already somewhat over\nClaremont Graduate\nthe word limit that National Forum has agreed to.\nAnica\nEvidenties\nWe plan to send the President's article to our list of some 2100\nsmall, community newspapers, and we will be happy to forward\ncopies of the tearsheets we receive, if you wish to see them. We\nwould like to send the article out November 27, if that schedule\nis not an inconvenience for you.\nAgain, we are very pleased that we can include the President's\narticle in our Bicentennial series. We are hopeful that the\nseries can have the effect of reminding Americans of the\nprinciples of the Constitution's framers, and of the importance\nof maintaining the institutions the framers created. The\nPresident's article is an important contribution to that effort.\nSincerely,\nPUBLIC RESEARCH.\nSYNDICATED\n4650 Arrow Highway\nSuite D-7\nMontclair. CAM1763\nJack Barlow\n(714) 621-5831\nEditor\n885 words\nTHE PRESIDENCY: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES\nby Ronald W. Reagan\nFor nearly 200 years, the Constitution has endured with relatively few\namendments as a blueprint for freedom. In commemorating the Bicentennial of the\nConstitution we celebrate not simply the historic event that took place in\nPhiladelphia on September 17, 1787, but the process by which we govern ourselves\ntoday. There is no better time than this Bicentennial period to refamiliarize\nourselves with the Constitution and rededicate ourselves to the values it\nembodies.\nThe central challenge confronting the Framers of the Constitution was to\ncreate a strong national government that would not threaten the liberties SO\nrecently won. The solution the Framers embraced was to diffuse the national\ngovernmental authority. Power was to be shared among separate institutions --\nthe legislature, the executive, and the judiciary - in order that no single\nbranch could become so powerful as to threaten the liberties of the people. In\nour study of the allocation of authority in the Constitution, it is important to\nkeep in mind the purpose of this allocation - nothing less than the preserva-\ntion of liberty.\nThe Framers looked primarily to the president to provide the critical\nelement of \"energy\" in the government. The problem with the government of the\nArticles of Confederation had been that it was \"destitute of energy.\" The\nDrafters of the Constitution redressed that problem by vesting \"competent\npowers\" in the executive to lead the Nation.\nThe president's popular mandate justified this grant of authority. The\npresident and the vice president are the only officials in our government elec-\nted through a process involving all the voters. Only the president can claim to\nspeak for all the people, because, as Hamilton wrote, his selection looks \"in\n1\nthe first instance to an immediate act of the people of America.\" The office of\npresident has \"a due dependence on the people, and a due responsibility.\"\nPerhaps the most pervasive responsibility of the president is to adminster\nthe executive branch. The Framers were practical men who recognized, as\nHamilton wrote, \"that the true test of a good government is its aptitude and\ntendency to produce a good administration.\" The people look ultimately to the\npresident to ensure the efficient performance of duty by the millions of federal\nemployees scattred among the various departments and agencies.\nThe challenge confronting the modern presidency is to \"produce a good\nadministration\" when the federal establishment has grown so far beyond anything\nthe framers could have imagined. It is an amazing fact that there are more\nfederal employees today than people living in America when the Framers drafted\nthe Constitution. Perhaps President George Washington could play an active role\nin supervising the details of the first administration, but it is now the\nresponsibility of his successors to create mechanisms for the control and\ncoordination of the executive branch.\nThe president has no more important responsibility under the Constitution\nthan the conduct of foreign affairs. The Framers recognized that of the two\ndemocratic branches, only the executive could successfully conduct foreign\nrelations. Hamilton noted in his description of the executive that \"Decision,\nactivity, secrecy, and dispatch will generally characterize the proceedings of\none man in a much more eminent degree than the proceedings of any greater\nnumber,\" and John Jay -- himself one of our most successful early diplomats -\nargued that \"the President will find no difficulty to provide\" those qualities,\nthough they were beyond the capability of a basically deliberative body such as\nCongress.\nApart from executive functions, the Constitution accords the president a\nsignificant role in the legislative process. The people have grown to expect\n2\nleadership from the president not only in executing the laws but also in\npresenting a legislative program to Congress for consideration.\nPerhaps the most prominent of the president's legislative powers is the\nqualified veto power. This power is qualified in the sense that a bill returned\nby the president with disapproval can nonetheless be enacted into law by a two-\nthirds vote of both houses. The Framers accorded the president a veto power for\ntwo reasons. First, they recognized the \"propensity of the legislative depart-\nment to intrude upon the rights, and to absorb the powers, of the other depart-\nments\" and provided the president a veto so that he could defend the preroga-\ntives of his office. The second purpose of the veto was as \"an additional\nsecurity against the enaction of improper laws.\"\nThe powers of the presidency are limited, and the president discharges\nconstitutional responsibilities in a system according other powers to the coor-\ndinate branches of the legislature and the judiciary. The members of all three\nbranches take an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it is a monument not only\nto the genius of the Framers but also to the statesmanship of those who have\nheld office under the Constitution that the system has worked as well as it has.\nPresidents have learned advisors at their disposal, and they can consult\nwith Congress, but the difficult and potentially momentous decisions the Consti-\ntution vests in the executive are, in the final analysis, the president's alone.\nOur most tested president, Abraham Lincoln, announced a guide for making those\ndecisions that has yet to be bettered:\nI desire so to conduct the affairs of this Administration\nthat if, at the end, when I come to lay down the reins of\npower, I have lost every other friend on earth, I shall at\nleast have one friend left, and that friend shall be down inside\nof me.\nEND-END-END\n3\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nSeptember 4, 1985\nDear Mr. Barlow:\nThank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission\nto reprint and distribute the President's article, \"The\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities,\" as part of The New\nFederalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint\nand distribute the article, and I have no objection to your\nplans to do SO.\nYou have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from\nthe President's article, and that you will submit the edited\nversion for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to\ndo this, and look forward to receiving your proposed\nexcerpt.\nThe New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am\npleased to learn of your plans to include the President's\narticle.\nSincerely,\nOrig. signed by FFF\nFred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nMr. Jack Barlow\n4650 Arrow Highway\nSuite D7\nMontclair, CA 91763\nFFF: JgR:aea 9/4/85\nbcc: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\n343999cu\nJV\nPR014-09\nTo\nTHE NEW\nFEDERALIST\nSeptember 16, 1985\nPAPERS\nMr. Fred F. Fielding\nCOPY\nCounsel to the President\nEditorial Advisors:\nThe White House\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nfrom ORM\nFrancis Canavan\nFordham University\nDon E. Fehrenbacher\nDear Mr. Fielding:\nStanford University\nSuzanne Garment\nThank you for your letter of September 4, regarding\nThe Wall Street Journal\npermission to reprint the President's article, \"The\nPhilip Kurland\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities.\"\nThe University of Chicago\nLeonard W Levi\nI shall be forwarding an edited version of the article\nClaremont Graduate School\nwithin the next couple of weeks, for your approval. We\nRongair\nare very pleased that we can include the President's\nTwentien Century Furno\narticle in our bicentennial series.\nWith thanks for your interest in our project,\nSincerely,\ntach Bulond\nJack Barlow\nEditor\nJB/ch\nPUBLIC RESEARCH,\nSYNDICATED\n(714) 621-5831\n4650 ARROW HIGHWA\nSUITE D7\nMONTCLAIR, CA 9176\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nDate\n9.24.85\nSuspense Date\nMEMORANDUM FOR: John\nFROM:\nDIANNA G. HOLLAND\nACTION\nApproved\nPlease handle/review\nX\nFor your information then to Central Feles\nFor your recommendation\nFor the files\nPlease see me\nPlease prepare response for\nsignature\nAs we discussed\nReturn to me for filing\nCOMMENT\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nSeptember 4, 1985\nDear Mr. Barlow:\nThank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission\nto reprint and distribute the President's article, \"The\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities,\" as part of The New\nFederalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint\nand distribute the article, and I have no objection to your\nplans to do SO.\nYou have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from\nthe President's article, and that you will submit the edited\nversion for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to\ndo this, and look forward to receiving your proposed\nexcerpt.\nThe New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am\npleased to learn of your plans to include the President's\narticle.\nSincerely,\nOrig. signed by FFF\nFred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nMr. Jack Barlow\n4650 Arrow Highway\nSuite D7\nMontclair, CA 91763\nFFF: JgR:aea 9/4/85\nbcc: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\n343999\nID #\nCU\nWHITE HOUSE\nPROMES\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\nO . OUTGOING\nH . INTERNAL\nDR\nI . INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n/\n/\nName of Correspondent: Jack Barlow\nP\nDAI\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\nORM\n(C)\nSubject: Request to reprent POTUS' article \"The\nPresidency: Roles d Responsibilities\"\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency\n(Staff Name)\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nWS\nCUHOLE\nORIGINATOR 85,09,03\nC 85,09,04\n3\nReferral Note:\nWet 18\nD 85,09,04 PP\nC 85,09,04\nReferral Note:\nCUFIEL\nK 85,09,04\nFF A 85,09,04\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/\n/\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/\n/\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES:\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA . Appropriate Action\n/ . Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA Answered\nC Completed\nC - Comment/Recommendation\nR. Direct Reply w/Copy\nB . Non-Special Referral\nS Suspended\nD Draft Response\nS For Signature\nF Furnish Fact Sheet\nX Interim Reply\nto be used as Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:\nType of Response = Initials of Signer\nCode = \"A\"\nCompletion Date = Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nSeptember 4, 1985\nDear Mr. Barlow:\nThank you for your letter of August 28, requesting permission\nto reprint and distribute the President's article, \"The\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities,\" as part of The New\nFederalist Papers. Permission is not required to reprint\nand distribute the article, and I have no objection to your\nplans to do SO.\nYou have indicated that you plan to excerpt 800 words from\nthe President's article, and that you will submit the edited\nversion for our approval. I appreciate your willingness to\ndo this, and look forward to receiving your proposed\nexcerpt.\nThe New Federalist Papers is an exciting project and I am\npleased to learn of your plans to include the President's\narticle.\nSincerely,\nOrig. signed by FFF\nFred F. Fielding\nCounsel to the President\nMr. Jack Barlow\n4650 Arrow Highway\nSuite D7\nMontclair, CA 91763\nFFF:JgR:aea 9/4/85\nbcc: FFFielding\nJGRoberts\nSubj\nChron\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nSeptember 4, 1985\nMEMORANDUM FOR FRED F. FIELDING\nFROM:\nJOHN G. ROBERTS J26\nSUBJECT:\nRequest to Reprint President's Article:\n\"The Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities\"\nThe Editor of The New Federalist Papers, a bicentennial\nproject of Public Research, Syndicated, has asked permission\nto reprint and distribute an 800-word excerpt from the\nPresident's article \"The Presidency: Roles and Responsi-\nbilities,\" which first appeared in the Fall 1984 National\nForum. The New Federalist Papers project provides articles\nto newspapers across the country free of charge. Several\narticles from the National Forum edition have already been\nsyndicated by The New Federalist Papers, including the Chief\nJustice's and the Speaker's, not to mention Dr. Mark Cannon's.\nPermission is not required to reprint the President's\narticle, since it was prepared in the course of his official\nduties. 17 U.S.C. § 105. The attached reply notes that\npermission is not required, and thanks the editor for\noffering to let us approve their editing of the President's\narticle.\nAttachment\nAugust 28, 1985\nTHE NEW\nMr. Fred Fielding\nFEDERALIST\nCounsel to the President\nThe White House\nPAPERS\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nDear Mr. Fielding:\nEditorial Advisors:\nI write at the suggestion of Dr. Mark Cannon to request\nFrancis Canavan\nFordham University\npermission to reprint President Reagan's article, \"The\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities,\" from the Fall,\nDon E. Fehrenbacher\nStanford University\n1984 National Forum as part of The New Federalist Papers.\nSuzanne Garment\nThe Wall Street Journal\nThe New Federalist Papers is the bicentennial project of\nPublic Research, Syndicated, and is supported in part by\nPhilip Kurland\nThe University of Chicago\na grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities.\nThe project began in January of 1984. Each month we\nLeonard W. Levy\nClaremont Graduate School\nsyndicate six articles on constitutional themes to a\nnationwide audience. Two articles a month are sent, free\nAbigail Thernstram\nTwentieth Century Fund\nof charge, to more than two thousand small, community\nnewspapers. A weekly article is sent to some one hundred\ndaily papers. The articles examine the various\nprovisions of the Constitution, as well as its historical\nroots, its political principles, and its meaning today.\nA distinguished roster of authors has contributed to the\nseries, including Chief Justice Burger, former Attorney\nGeneral Smith, Civil Rights Commission Chairman Clarence\nPendleton, and former Senator Eugene McCarthy. From the\nscholarly community, we have had articles from Henry\nSteele Commager, Samuel Beer, Gordon S. Wood, Harry V.\nJaffa, and many others. We hope the President will be\nwilling to join this group.\nPUBLIC RESEARCH,\nSYNDICATED\n180 Indian Hill Blvd\nDr. Cannon and the editors of National Forum have given\nSuite 2\nus their permission to excerpt and syndicate selected\nClaremont, CA-91711\narticles from the Fall, 1984 issue of National Forum, of\n(714) 621-5831\nwhich Dr. Cannon was guest editor. We have already\n4650 ARROW HIGHWAY\nsyndicated articles by Dr. Cannon, Speaker of the House\nSUITE\n'Neill, and Chief Justice Burger, and we plan to use two\nMONTCLAIR, CA 9176\nor three more as well.\nWe would excerpt about 800 words from the President's\narticle; if we are given permission, we would plan to do\nthe preliminary editing here and send it to you for\napproval. If, however, it would be preferable to have the\nediting done by someone on the staff there, we would certainly be\nopen to such an arrangement. We offer an honorarium of $250.\nBoth the legislative and the judicial branches have been\nrepresented in our series; I hope the President will be willing\nto join in this public celebration of the Constitution's\nbicentennial. If I can provide you with further information\nabout the project, or answer any questions, please call me.\nSincerely,\ntab Bulon5\nJack Barlow\nEditor\nCC: John Roberts\nJB/wp\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nDecember 11, 1985\nDear Mr. Silver:\nThis is in response to your letter of December 2 to the\nPresident. Along with that letter you sent a check for\n$250.00 as payment for the President's article, \"The\nPresidency: Roles and Responsibilities.\" The article\nfirst appeared in the Fall 1984 National Forum. This\noffice advised the editor of The New Federalist Papers\nthat permission was not required to reprint and distribute\nthe President's article.\nPursuant to established White House policy, the President\ndoes not accept honoraria or payment for work of this\nnature. Accordingly, we are returning your check.\nSincerely,\nJohn G. Roberts\nAssociate Counsel to the President\nMr. Thomas B. Silver\nPresident, Public Research\nSyndicated\n480 N. Indian Hill Boulevard\nSuite 2\nClaremont, CA 91711\nID #. 343999 CU\nWHITE HOUSE\nPR014-09\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\no - OUTGOING\ng-duit\nH - INTERNAL\nI - INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n/\n/\nreturn\nName of Correspondent:\nJack Barlow\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\nSubject:\nThe Presidency Roles and Benjanaebeleties\"\nforwards sheek to POTUS for article\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency\n(Staff Name)\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nCUItolland\nORIGINATOR 08511209\n/\n/\nReferral Note:\nCUAT18\nR 851/21/0\nCV 585112,20\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n-\n/\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/\n/\nReferral Note:\n/ /\n/\n/\nReferral Note:\nACTION CODES:\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA Appropriate Action\nI Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA Answered\nC Completed\nC Comment/Recommendation\nR Direct Reply w/Copy\nB - Non-Special Referral\nS Suspended\nD Draft Response\nS For Signature\nF Furnish Fact Sheet\nX Interim Reply\nto be used as Enclosure\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE:\nType of Response = Initials of Signer\nCode = \"A\"\nCompletion Date = Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\nARCH - QUERY\n001 NEW WITH FEDERALIST WITH PAPERS\nJ.R\n3999CU\nDOCUMENT=\n1 OF\n1\nCTDATE = 850903\nDDNUMP =\nREDATE = 850904\nOCDATE = 850828\nSPDATE = 850904\nAMF\n= BARLOW\nCVDATE = 850904\nECID\n= 343999CU\nTATE\n= CA\nPDATF\n= 851113\n= 91763\nWS\nCDATE\n850828\nCTYP\nIBA\nDIA\nI\nAFF\nFRED FIELDING\nCUFIEL\nMR. JACK BARLOW\nTLE\nEDITOR\nTHE NEW FEDERALIST PAPERS\nDR\nMONTCLAIR\nCA 91763\nREET\n4650 ARROW HIGHWAY\nSUITE D7\nBJECT\nREQUEST TO REPRINT POTUS ARTICLE \"THE\nPRESIDENCY: ROLES AND PESPONSIBILITIES\"\nBCODF\nPR014-09\nPP001\nBE003-04 FG001\nPU\nDCODF\n4800 4620\nCUHOLL ORG 850903 C 850904\nCUAT18 RSD 850904 C 850904\nCUFIEL RSR 850904 FF A 850904\nCUHOLL ORG 851101 CONTINUING CORRESPONDENCE C 851106\nCUAT18 RSD 851104 C 851106\nCUFIEL RSS 851106 FF A 851106\nMMENTS\nSEP 16 85 JACK BARLOW THANK YOU LETTER TO\nFRED FIELDING ATTACHED\n601 * END OF DOCUMENTS IN LIST - ENTER RETURN OR ANOTHER COMMAND.\nTHE NEW\nFEDERALIST\nPAPERS\nDecember 2, 1985\nJ. Jackson Banov\nEdito\nThe Honorable Ronald W. Reagan\nThe White House\nWashington, D.C. 20500\nDear President Reagan:\nEnclosed please find a check in the amount of $250.00\nas payment for your article, \"The Presidency: Roles\nand Responsibilities.\"\nThank you for your contribution to Public Research,\nSyndicated.\nSincerely,\nusing\nThomas B. Silver\nPresident\nTBS:jp\nEnclosure Check #3460\nPUBLIC RESEARCH,\nSYNDICATED\n4650 Arrow Highway\nSuite D-7\n.\nMontclair, CA 91763\n(714) 621-5831\nWITHDRAWAL SHEET\nRonald Reagan Library\nCollection Name\nWithdrawer\nROBERTS, JOHN: FILES\nRB 8/3/2005\nW\nFile Folder\nFOIA\nJGR/ARTICLE ON THE PRESIDENCY, NATIONAL FORUM (7\nF05-139/01\nOF 7)\nCOOK\nBox Number\n6RW\nDOC Document Type\nNo of Doc Date Restric-\nNO\nDocument Description\npages\ntions\n1\nCHECK\n1 11/21/1985 B6\n439\nPERSONAL CHECK\nFreedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]\nB-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]\nB-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]\nB-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]\nB-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]\nB-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]\nB-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]\nB-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]\nB-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]\nE.O. 13233\nC. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift."
}