Ask the Scholar
Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
Digital Library Collections
This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections.
Collection: Roberts, John G.: Files
Folder Title: JGR/Whistleblower Protection Act
(1 of 3)
Box: 56
To see more digitized collections visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library
To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection
Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected]
Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing
National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
February 13, 1986
MEMORANDUM FOR HILDA SCHREIBER
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
FROM:
ASSOCIATE COUNSEL 870 THE PRESIDENT
JOHN G. ROBERTS
SUBJECT:
OPM's Testimony on H.R. 4033, "The
Whistleblower Protection Act of 1986"
Counsel's Office has reviewed the above-referenced testimony and
finds no objection to it from a legal perspective.
ID
WHITE HOUSE
CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET
. - OUTGOING
H - INTERNAL
1 + INCOMING
Date Correspondence
Received (YY/MM/DD)
1
/
Name of Correspondent:
name sweeney
MI Mail Report
User Codes: (A)
(B)
(C)
Subject: 8PM's testimony on H.e. 4033 "The
Whistliblower protection act of 1986"
ROUTE TO:
ACTION
DISPOSITION
Tracking
Type
Completion
Action
Date
of
Date
Office/Agency (Staff Name)
Code
YY/MM/DD
Response
Code
YY/MM/DD
CUNTOIL
ORIGINATOR 86,02,13
/ 1
Referral Note:
cuat 18
B
36,02,13
5 86,02,18
Referral Note:
I /
/ /
Referral Note:
I /
/ /
#
Referral Note:
/
/
/ /
Referral Note:
MOTION DIDES:
DISPOSITION CODES:
A Appropriate Action
1 Imo Copy Only/No Action Necessary
A - Answered
C -ICompleted
C - Comment/Recommendation
R Direct Reply w/Copy
B Non-Special Referral
d
I
D , Draft Response
S For Signature
F Furnish Fact Sheet
X Interim Reply
to be used as Encloseme
FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
Type of Response If Initials of Signer
Code
"A"
Completion Date * Date of Outgoing
Comments:
Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.
Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).
Always return completed correspondence record to Central Files.
Refer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.
5/81
THE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
February 12, 1986
SPECIAL
LEGISLATIVE REFERRAL MEMORANDUM
TO:
Legislative Liaison Officer
Department of Justice - J. Perkins 633-2113
Merit Systems Protection Board - Paul Trayers
Office of Special Counsel, MSPB - Alma Hepner
SUBJECT: OPM's testimony for 2/20/86 on H.R. 4033, "The
Whistleblower Protection Act of 1986."
The Office of Management and Budget requests the views of your
agency on the above subject before advising on its relationship
to the program of the President, in accordance with OMB Circular
A-19.
A response to this request for your views is needed no later
than COB, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1986.
Questions should be referred to
Hilda Schreiber
( 395-7362)
the legislative analyst in this office.
Naomi R. Sweeney for
Assistant Director for
Legislative Reference
Enclosures
CC: F. Seidl
J. Cooney, OGC
White House Counsel
N. Sweeney
SPECIAL
STATEMENT OF
HONORABLE CONSTANCE HORNER, DIRECTOR
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
for the
SUBCOMMITTEE ON CIVIL SERVICE
COMMITTEE ON POST OFFICE AND CIVIL SERVICE
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
on
H.R. 4033
THE WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT OF 1986
MADAM CHAIRWOMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE:
THANK YOU FOR INVITING ME TO PRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE OFFICE
OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ON H.R. 4033, THE "WHISTLEBLOWER
PROTECTION ACT OF 1986."
DESPITE ITS TITLE, THE BILL IS NOT LIMITED TO WHISTLEBLOWER
PROTECTION. IN FACT, IT PROPOSES A MAJOR RESTRUCTURING OF
THE FUNCTIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL
COUNSEL AND THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.
WE
RECOGNIZE THAT THE BILL IS THEREFORE OF PRIME INTEREST TO
THOSE AGENCIES. HOWEVER, AS THE CENTRAL PERSONNEL MANAGE-
MENT AGENCY FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WE ARE CONCERNED
THAT THE BILL WOULD CREATE A PROLIFERATION OF MECHANISMS
WHICH WOULD NOT HELP THE CAUSE OF LEGITIMATE WHISTLEBLOWERS,
BUT WOULD GREATLY ENDANGER THE EFFICIENT OPERATION OF
AGENCIES.
2
THERE IS NO QUESTION OF THIS ADMINISTRATION'S COMMITMENT TO
THE WHISTLEBLOWER. IN 1980, THE PRESIDENT PROMISED SUPPORT
AND PROTECTION FOR THOSE WHO DISCLOSE FRAUD, WASTE, AND
ABUSE IN GOVERNMENT. LEGITIMATE WHISTLEBLOWERS NOT ONLY
SAVE THE TAXPAYERS VALUABLE TAX DOLLARS, THEY STRENGTHEN THE
MERIT SYSTEM BY HELPING TO ENSURE HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT.
THE ONLY QUESTION IS, HOW CAN WE BEST MAKE SURE THAT
WHISTLEBLOWERS ARE PROTECTED?
WE AGREE WITH THE SPECIAL COUNSEL THAT THE BEST PROTECTION
AGAINST RETALIATION IS VIGOROUS PROSECUTION OF THOSE WHO
COMMIT PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES AGAINST THOSE WHO
DISCLOSE FRAUD, WASTE, OR ABUSE. THE RECENT SUCCESSES OF
THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL HAVE RECEIVED WIDESPREAD
PUBLICITY AND ARE DRAMATIC EXAMPLES OF THE INTANGIBLE, BUT
REAL, PREVENTIVE VALUE OF VIGOROUS ENFORCEMENT. WHILE MUCH
HAS BEEN MADE OF THE LOW PERCENTAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWER CASES
THAT ARE ACTUALLY PROSECUTED, THERE IS A SIMPLE EXPLANATION.
ACCORDING TO THE GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE, THE FACT IS THAT
FEW OF THE CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL
COUNSEL HAVE SUFFICIENT MERIT TO WARRANT PROSECUTION. BY
SCREENING OUT FRIVOLOUS CASES, WORKING TO RESOLVE CASES
INFORMALLY, AND VIGOROUSLY PURSUING LEGITIMATE WHISTLEBLOWER
CASES, THE SPECIAL COUNSEL HAS MADE GREAT PROGRESS IN PRO-
TECTING WHISTLEBLOWERS AND PROMOTING EFFICIENCY IN
GOVERNMENT.
3
ALTHOUGH THE FACTS DO NOT SUPPORT A CONCLUSION THAT THERE IS
A PROBLEM, THE BILL WOULD RADICALLY ALTER THE SYSTEM FOR
HANDLING WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS, AND RESTRUCTURE THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND THE SPECIAL COUNSEL. I
WILL DEFER TO THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL, THE MERIT
SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO
DISCUSS IN DETAIL THE PROCEDURAL CHANGES AND THE EXPANSION
OF LITIGATION AUTHORITIES PROPOSED BY THE BILL. BUT I DO
WANT TO POINT OUT THE GENERAL CONCERN WE HAVE ABOUT THE
BILL'S IMPACT ON PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT IN THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT.
THERE IS A BALANCE THAT MUST BE STRUCK BETWEEN PROVIDING
GREATER PROTECTION FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS AND THE NECESSITY FOR
EFFICIENT AND ORDERLY OPERATION OF AGENCIES. AS GAO HAS
TESTIFIED, "UNRESTRAINED WHISTLEBLOWING COULD RAISE LEVELS
OF DISSIDENCE AND INSUBORDINATION TO THE POINT WHERE
EFFICIENCY COULD BE AFFECTED." BECAUSE OF THE PROLIFERATION
OF REMEDIES PROVIDED BY THE BILL, DISGRUNTLED EMPLOYEES
COULD FLOOD THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL AND THE MERIT
SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD WITH SPURIOUS COMPLAINTS. THE
OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL WOULD BE REQUIRED TO
ESTABLISH AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP WITH EVERY
COMPLAINANT WHO COMES THROUGH THE DOOR. THAT OFFICE WOULD
BE DEPRIVED OF ANY OPPORTUNITY TO SCREEN OUT FRIVOLOUS CASES
AND WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CONCENTRATE ATTENTION AND RESOURCES
4
ON LEGITIMATE WHISTLEBLOWERS. TO COMPOUND THE PROBLEM, THE
BILL PROVIDES FOR DE NOVO REVIEWS IN THE COURTS FOR
EMPLOYEES WHO ARE DISSATISFIED WITH THE ACTIONS OF THE
SPECIAL COUNSEL OR MSPB. THIS PROVISION WOULD WEAKEN THE
AUTHORITY OF BOTH AGENCIES AND PLACE A FURTHER STRAIN ON THE
ALREADY OVERBURDENED FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM, WHEN WE HAVE IN
PLACE A FUNCTIONING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING
WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS.
I THINK THAT THE MAJOR FLAW OF THIS BILL IS THAT IT DOES NOT
RECOGNIZE THAT THE OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL IS BUT ONE LINK
IN THE PROCESS FOR RESOLVING WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS. AS
GAO CONCLUDED, "OTHER INSTITUTIONS, INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT,
THE CONGRESS, THE MEDIA, THE COURTS, AGENCY LEADERSHIP AND
APPEALS SYSTEMS, THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, AND
INSPECTORS GENERAL ARE ALSO INVOLVED IN SUPPORT FOR THE ROLE
OF WHISTLEBLOWERS IN GOVERNMENT." IT MAY BE, AS GAO
SUGGESTS, THAT THE REASON THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL
RECEIVES so FEW LEGITIMATE WHISTLEBLOWER CASES IS THAT MOST
OF THESE ARE RESOLVED THROUGH OTHER MEANS. FROM OUR
PERSPECTIVE, THAT IS AS IT SHOULD BE. CERTAINLY, THE
PRESIDENT HAS EXPRESSED HIS SUPPORT FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS. IF
THERE ARE PROBLEMS IN THE CURRENT SYSTEM, WE MUST ALL WORK
TOGETHER TO INSURE THAT WHISTLEBLOWERS CAN STEP FORWARD
WITHOUT FEAR OF REPRISAL. THEIR CAUSE WILL NOT BE HELPED,
HOWEVER, BY MAKING THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL THE
5
FIRST RESORT FOR ALL THOSE EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ALREADY
INUNDATING THE SPECIAL COUNSEL WITH GRIEVANCES NOT RELATED
TO THE NECESSITY FOR PROTECTION OF LEGITIMATE WHISTLE-
BLOWERS. H.R. 4033 WOULD LESSEN THE LIKELIHOOD THAT THE
LEGITIMATE WHISTELEBLOWER'S CASE WOULD RECEIVE THE PROPER
ATTENTION, AND INCREASE THE PROBABILITY OF DISRUPTION TO
AGENCIES AT A TIME WHEN EVERYONE IS BEING ASKED TO DO MORE
WITH LESS.
FOR THESE REASONS WE ARE STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THIS BILL.
THANK YOU.
Page data
- Page
- 1
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- 97242650458a865c
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 135839674
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "135839674",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/135839674",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "JGR/Whistleblower Protection Act (1 of 3)",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/135839674",
"identifierLocal": "485",
"collections": [
"Records of the Office of Counsel to the President (Reagan Administration)",
"John Roberts' Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-056-027-2017.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-056-027-2017.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-056-027-2017.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "135839674",
"label": "JGR/Whistleblower Protection Act (1 of 3)",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/135839674"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "135839674",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/135839674",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "JGR/Whistleblower Protection Act (1 of 3)",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/135839674",
"identifierLocal": "485",
"collections": [
"Records of the Office of Counsel to the President (Reagan Administration)",
"John Roberts' Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-056-027-2017.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-056-027-2017.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-056-027-2017.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/135839674",
"naId": 135839674,
"coverageEndDate": {
"logicalDate": "1986-12-31",
"year": 1986
},
"coverageStartDate": {
"logicalDate": "1982-01-01",
"year": 1982
},
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 1,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/6908381/40-485-6908381-056-027-2017.pdf",
"mediaId": "97242650458a865c",
"ocrText": "Ronald Reagan Presidential Library\nDigital Library Collections\nThis is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections.\nCollection: Roberts, John G.: Files\nFolder Title: JGR/Whistleblower Protection Act\n(1 of 3)\nBox: 56\nTo see more digitized collections visit:\nhttps://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library\nTo see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:\nhttps://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection\nContact a reference archivist at: [email protected]\nCitation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing\nNational Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nFebruary 13, 1986\nMEMORANDUM FOR HILDA SCHREIBER\nLEGISLATIVE ANALYST\nOFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET\nFROM:\nASSOCIATE COUNSEL 870 THE PRESIDENT\nJOHN G. ROBERTS\nSUBJECT:\nOPM's Testimony on H.R. 4033, \"The\nWhistleblower Protection Act of 1986\"\nCounsel's Office has reviewed the above-referenced testimony and\nfinds no objection to it from a legal perspective.\nID\nWHITE HOUSE\nCORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET\n. - OUTGOING\nH - INTERNAL\n1 + INCOMING\nDate Correspondence\nReceived (YY/MM/DD)\n1\n/\nName of Correspondent:\nname sweeney\nMI Mail Report\nUser Codes: (A)\n(B)\n(C)\nSubject: 8PM's testimony on H.e. 4033 \"The\nWhistliblower protection act of 1986\"\nROUTE TO:\nACTION\nDISPOSITION\nTracking\nType\nCompletion\nAction\nDate\nof\nDate\nOffice/Agency (Staff Name)\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nResponse\nCode\nYY/MM/DD\nCUNTOIL\nORIGINATOR 86,02,13\n/ 1\nReferral Note:\ncuat 18\nB\n36,02,13\n5 86,02,18\nReferral Note:\nI /\n/ /\nReferral Note:\nI /\n/ /\n#\nReferral Note:\n/\n/\n/ /\nReferral Note:\nMOTION DIDES:\nDISPOSITION CODES:\nA Appropriate Action\n1 Imo Copy Only/No Action Necessary\nA - Answered\nC -ICompleted\nC - Comment/Recommendation\nR Direct Reply w/Copy\nB Non-Special Referral\nd\nI\nD , Draft Response\nS For Signature\nF Furnish Fact Sheet\nX Interim Reply\nto be used as Encloseme\nFOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE\nType of Response If Initials of Signer\nCode\n\"A\"\nCompletion Date * Date of Outgoing\nComments:\nKeep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter.\nSend all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB).\nAlways return completed correspondence record to Central Files.\nRefer questions about the correspondence tracking system to Central Reference, ext. 2590.\n5/81\nTHE\nEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT\nOFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20503\nFebruary 12, 1986\nSPECIAL\nLEGISLATIVE REFERRAL MEMORANDUM\nTO:\nLegislative Liaison Officer\nDepartment of Justice - J. Perkins 633-2113\nMerit Systems Protection Board - Paul Trayers\nOffice of Special Counsel, MSPB - Alma Hepner\nSUBJECT: OPM's testimony for 2/20/86 on H.R. 4033, \"The\nWhistleblower Protection Act of 1986.\"\nThe Office of Management and Budget requests the views of your\nagency on the above subject before advising on its relationship\nto the program of the President, in accordance with OMB Circular\nA-19.\nA response to this request for your views is needed no later\nthan COB, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1986.\nQuestions should be referred to\nHilda Schreiber\n( 395-7362)\nthe legislative analyst in this office.\nNaomi R. Sweeney for\nAssistant Director for\nLegislative Reference\nEnclosures\nCC: F. Seidl\nJ. Cooney, OGC\nWhite House Counsel\nN. Sweeney\nSPECIAL\nSTATEMENT OF\nHONORABLE CONSTANCE HORNER, DIRECTOR\nOFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT\nfor the\nSUBCOMMITTEE ON CIVIL SERVICE\nCOMMITTEE ON POST OFFICE AND CIVIL SERVICE\nU.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES\non\nH.R. 4033\nTHE WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT OF 1986\nMADAM CHAIRWOMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE:\nTHANK YOU FOR INVITING ME TO PRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE OFFICE\nOF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ON H.R. 4033, THE \"WHISTLEBLOWER\nPROTECTION ACT OF 1986.\"\nDESPITE ITS TITLE, THE BILL IS NOT LIMITED TO WHISTLEBLOWER\nPROTECTION. IN FACT, IT PROPOSES A MAJOR RESTRUCTURING OF\nTHE FUNCTIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL\nCOUNSEL AND THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.\nWE\nRECOGNIZE THAT THE BILL IS THEREFORE OF PRIME INTEREST TO\nTHOSE AGENCIES. HOWEVER, AS THE CENTRAL PERSONNEL MANAGE-\nMENT AGENCY FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WE ARE CONCERNED\nTHAT THE BILL WOULD CREATE A PROLIFERATION OF MECHANISMS\nWHICH WOULD NOT HELP THE CAUSE OF LEGITIMATE WHISTLEBLOWERS,\nBUT WOULD GREATLY ENDANGER THE EFFICIENT OPERATION OF\nAGENCIES.\n2\nTHERE IS NO QUESTION OF THIS ADMINISTRATION'S COMMITMENT TO\nTHE WHISTLEBLOWER. IN 1980, THE PRESIDENT PROMISED SUPPORT\nAND PROTECTION FOR THOSE WHO DISCLOSE FRAUD, WASTE, AND\nABUSE IN GOVERNMENT. LEGITIMATE WHISTLEBLOWERS NOT ONLY\nSAVE THE TAXPAYERS VALUABLE TAX DOLLARS, THEY STRENGTHEN THE\nMERIT SYSTEM BY HELPING TO ENSURE HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT.\nTHE ONLY QUESTION IS, HOW CAN WE BEST MAKE SURE THAT\nWHISTLEBLOWERS ARE PROTECTED?\nWE AGREE WITH THE SPECIAL COUNSEL THAT THE BEST PROTECTION\nAGAINST RETALIATION IS VIGOROUS PROSECUTION OF THOSE WHO\nCOMMIT PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES AGAINST THOSE WHO\nDISCLOSE FRAUD, WASTE, OR ABUSE. THE RECENT SUCCESSES OF\nTHE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL HAVE RECEIVED WIDESPREAD\nPUBLICITY AND ARE DRAMATIC EXAMPLES OF THE INTANGIBLE, BUT\nREAL, PREVENTIVE VALUE OF VIGOROUS ENFORCEMENT. WHILE MUCH\nHAS BEEN MADE OF THE LOW PERCENTAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWER CASES\nTHAT ARE ACTUALLY PROSECUTED, THERE IS A SIMPLE EXPLANATION.\nACCORDING TO THE GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE, THE FACT IS THAT\nFEW OF THE CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL\nCOUNSEL HAVE SUFFICIENT MERIT TO WARRANT PROSECUTION. BY\nSCREENING OUT FRIVOLOUS CASES, WORKING TO RESOLVE CASES\nINFORMALLY, AND VIGOROUSLY PURSUING LEGITIMATE WHISTLEBLOWER\nCASES, THE SPECIAL COUNSEL HAS MADE GREAT PROGRESS IN PRO-\nTECTING WHISTLEBLOWERS AND PROMOTING EFFICIENCY IN\nGOVERNMENT.\n3\nALTHOUGH THE FACTS DO NOT SUPPORT A CONCLUSION THAT THERE IS\nA PROBLEM, THE BILL WOULD RADICALLY ALTER THE SYSTEM FOR\nHANDLING WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS, AND RESTRUCTURE THE\nRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND THE SPECIAL COUNSEL. I\nWILL DEFER TO THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL, THE MERIT\nSYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO\nDISCUSS IN DETAIL THE PROCEDURAL CHANGES AND THE EXPANSION\nOF LITIGATION AUTHORITIES PROPOSED BY THE BILL. BUT I DO\nWANT TO POINT OUT THE GENERAL CONCERN WE HAVE ABOUT THE\nBILL'S IMPACT ON PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT IN THE FEDERAL\nGOVERNMENT.\nTHERE IS A BALANCE THAT MUST BE STRUCK BETWEEN PROVIDING\nGREATER PROTECTION FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS AND THE NECESSITY FOR\nEFFICIENT AND ORDERLY OPERATION OF AGENCIES. AS GAO HAS\nTESTIFIED, \"UNRESTRAINED WHISTLEBLOWING COULD RAISE LEVELS\nOF DISSIDENCE AND INSUBORDINATION TO THE POINT WHERE\nEFFICIENCY COULD BE AFFECTED.\" BECAUSE OF THE PROLIFERATION\nOF REMEDIES PROVIDED BY THE BILL, DISGRUNTLED EMPLOYEES\nCOULD FLOOD THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL AND THE MERIT\nSYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD WITH SPURIOUS COMPLAINTS. THE\nOFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL WOULD BE REQUIRED TO\nESTABLISH AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP WITH EVERY\nCOMPLAINANT WHO COMES THROUGH THE DOOR. THAT OFFICE WOULD\nBE DEPRIVED OF ANY OPPORTUNITY TO SCREEN OUT FRIVOLOUS CASES\nAND WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CONCENTRATE ATTENTION AND RESOURCES\n4\nON LEGITIMATE WHISTLEBLOWERS. TO COMPOUND THE PROBLEM, THE\nBILL PROVIDES FOR DE NOVO REVIEWS IN THE COURTS FOR\nEMPLOYEES WHO ARE DISSATISFIED WITH THE ACTIONS OF THE\nSPECIAL COUNSEL OR MSPB. THIS PROVISION WOULD WEAKEN THE\nAUTHORITY OF BOTH AGENCIES AND PLACE A FURTHER STRAIN ON THE\nALREADY OVERBURDENED FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM, WHEN WE HAVE IN\nPLACE A FUNCTIONING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING\nWHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS.\nI THINK THAT THE MAJOR FLAW OF THIS BILL IS THAT IT DOES NOT\nRECOGNIZE THAT THE OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL IS BUT ONE LINK\nIN THE PROCESS FOR RESOLVING WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS. AS\nGAO CONCLUDED, \"OTHER INSTITUTIONS, INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT,\nTHE CONGRESS, THE MEDIA, THE COURTS, AGENCY LEADERSHIP AND\nAPPEALS SYSTEMS, THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, AND\nINSPECTORS GENERAL ARE ALSO INVOLVED IN SUPPORT FOR THE ROLE\nOF WHISTLEBLOWERS IN GOVERNMENT.\" IT MAY BE, AS GAO\nSUGGESTS, THAT THE REASON THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL\nRECEIVES so FEW LEGITIMATE WHISTLEBLOWER CASES IS THAT MOST\nOF THESE ARE RESOLVED THROUGH OTHER MEANS. FROM OUR\nPERSPECTIVE, THAT IS AS IT SHOULD BE. CERTAINLY, THE\nPRESIDENT HAS EXPRESSED HIS SUPPORT FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS. IF\nTHERE ARE PROBLEMS IN THE CURRENT SYSTEM, WE MUST ALL WORK\nTOGETHER TO INSURE THAT WHISTLEBLOWERS CAN STEP FORWARD\nWITHOUT FEAR OF REPRISAL. THEIR CAUSE WILL NOT BE HELPED,\nHOWEVER, BY MAKING THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL THE\n5\nFIRST RESORT FOR ALL THOSE EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ALREADY\nINUNDATING THE SPECIAL COUNSEL WITH GRIEVANCES NOT RELATED\nTO THE NECESSITY FOR PROTECTION OF LEGITIMATE WHISTLE-\nBLOWERS. H.R. 4033 WOULD LESSEN THE LIKELIHOOD THAT THE\nLEGITIMATE WHISTELEBLOWER'S CASE WOULD RECEIVE THE PROPER\nATTENTION, AND INCREASE THE PROBABILITY OF DISRUPTION TO\nAGENCIES AT A TIME WHEN EVERYONE IS BEING ASKED TO DO MORE\nWITH LESS.\nFOR THESE REASONS WE ARE STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THIS BILL.\nTHANK YOU."
}