Ask the Scholar
Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
Digital Library Collections
This is a PDF of a folder from our textual
collections.
Collection: Reagan, Ronald: Gubernatorial Papers,
1966-74: Press Unit
Folder Title: Press Releases -
12/22/1971-12/31/1971
Box: P12
To see more digitized collections visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library
To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection
Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected]
Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing
National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE:
Immediate
Sacramento, Californi
Contact:
Paul Bec
445-4571
12-22-71
#716
Governor Ronald Reagan today announced the following
bill has been signed:
AB 2015 - McAlister Provides for an experimental project in Santa Clara
(Chapter 1810)
County (until December 31, 1974) in which the County
Superintendent of Schools, with the approval of the
County Board of Education and the Board of
Supervisors, could establish and maintain classes
for prisoners in county jails.
The governor also announced the veto of the following bills:
AB 220 - Brown
Establishes the Division of Marine Traffic Control in
the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development.
REASON FOR VETO:
"AB 220 duplicates present efforts of the U. S. Coast
Guard toward the development of a navigational safety
system for California's waters. To mandate State
intervention in this area would confuse and retard
rather than accelerate the development of an
operational and practical system.
"Additionally, the bill does not identify the large
amount of capital expenditures that would be
required for radar positioning and tracking systems.
"I have directed the Department of Navigation and
Ocean Development to work closely with the Coast
Guard to develop an appropriate navigational
safety system, which can be developed and implemented
for all of California's waters at the earliest
possible date.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the
governor said.
AB 681 - McCarthy
Would require the Division of Industrial Safety of
the Department of Industrial Relations to investigate
all complaints on unsafe working conditions within
three working days, regardless of the severity or
location of the hazard involved.
REASON FOR VETO:
"There is no demonstrated need for this legislation
since the Division of Industrial Relations has always
placed high priority in the handling of complaints.
The three-day limit proposed by AB 681 is an
unnecessary restriction on the Division, limiting its
ability to apply its resources and skills at the
places of greatest need. A safety engineer, for
example, might be forced to travel many miles to
investigate a complaint involving nuisance dust
instead of responding immediately to a more serious
hazard, like an unshored trench, at another location.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the
governor said.
AB 1419 - Warren
Would establish the position of State Public Defender t
to be appointed by the Judicial Council.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I recently vetoed SB 24 which would have provided for
the appointment of a State Public Defender by the
Governor.
-1-
#716
REASON FOR VETO:
"AB 1419 is unacceptable for a number of reasons. It
AB 1419 - Warren
is contrary to progressive judicial administration
(Continued)
because it removes from the attorney who represents
the indigent criminal defendant at trial the
responsibility for his post-trial representation as
well. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger has expressed
his disapproval of this practice in his recent Report
on the State of the Judiciary: " (A) large factor in
the excessive cost and excessive delay in criminal
appeals is the tendency to appoint a new lawyer on
appeal
Requiring the trial lawyer to conduct the
appeal
will
save both time and money." (57 American
Bar Association Journal 855,858).
"I, too, am convinced that representation of the
indigent defendants is best performed by locally
appointed counsel, preferably the one who represented
him at trial. The bench and the Bar have a
professional responsibility, indeed obligation, to
represent the indigent criminal defendant at the
appellate level. Private attorneys, acting under
court appointment, are now able to represent adequate]
appellants in these cases. To spawn yet another
expensive governmental agency such as an office of
State Public Defender to handle these matters, when
they can and should be handled by the bench and bar,
would merely add an additional level of bureaucracy
which I believe is neither necessary nor appropriate.
"Although it is true that there is a backlog of
cases before the courts, there is no compelling
evidence to support the allegation that a public
defender would speed up the judicial process. To
the contrary, there is a very high probability that
more cases built on new strained theories would be
appealed as a new office holder sought to justify his
existence and performance.
"It is time that the bench and the bar face the issues
squarely and look to themselves for the answers which
this bill purportedly seeks. SB 24 is clearly not
the answer.
"As I have said before, I am vigorously opposed to
the concept of establishing an office of State Public
Defender and I will continue to strongly oppose
the enactment of such legislation. At the same
time, I want to emphasize that I favor judicial
reform and have supported Chief Justice Donald Wright
in establishing the Select Committee on Trial Court
Delay.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the
governor said.
AB 1661 - Brathwaite Would require that any psychiatrist or physician
employed by a prisoner or his attorney be
permitted to visit the prisoner.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I fully agree that the constitutional right of an
accused to prepare his defense must be protected.
A part of this protection should be access to
qualified medical practitioners.
"However, AB 1661 does not require that such persons
be licensed by the state to insure their qualification.
As written, it would permit unlimited access to any
prisoner after trial as well as before trial.
Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the
governor said.
-2-
#716
AB 2346 - Cullen
Would establish a formula for determining, under the
Medi-Cal program, reasonable costs of skilled nursing
home services and intermediate care facility services.
The formula is based primarily on using the mean
average of costs experienced within specified size
groupings and several other unacceptable factors.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The use of averages in rate computation tends to
skew the rate upward and discourages efficiency and
cost effectiveness. Application of the other
factors, such as the return on equity and the use
of Franchise Tax Board criteria, unrealistically
serves to increase General Fund expenditures for
nursing home care. Conservatively, such an increase
is estimated to be between $10 million and $20 million
dollars per year.
"Further, the bill's provision to have the Director
of Health Care Services consult with individuals
or organizations operating nursing homes in the
administration of the program and the funding of
changes in standards and requirements of the program
duplicate the work of the California Health Care
Commission created by AB 949 (Chapter 577, Stautes of
1971).
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the
governor said.
AB 3006 - Vasconcellos
Repeals the present law governing political
activities of local government employees. The
bill limits, with certain exceptions, the restrictions
on political activities of such employees.
REASON FOR VETO:
"AB 3006 would make possible a multitude of
differing regulations governing the political
activities of local public employees throughout the
state. The bill provides that local governing
bodies can establish rules and regulations limited
to three areas of political activity, but does not
provide that such rules and regulations be uniform in
their statewide application.
"If the public interest is to be served by clarifying
the political activities in which public employees
may be involved, then uniformity is essential.
This bill would result in confusion even within the
same community where different local jurisdictions
are present.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned, " the
governor said.
SB 565 - Stiern
Would increase the in lien tax on automobiles by an
average of 34 percent.
REASON FOR VETO:
"This is an additional tax on property. For the State
to impose yet another burden on our already beleagured
property taxpayers--especially at a time when home-
owners taxes at the local level continue to rise to
new heights--not only would ignore their plight, but
also would fly in the face of their earnest and
justifiable desire for real and lasting property tax
relief.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the
governor said.
-3-
AB 1181 - Murphy
This bill would create a Joi
Committee on
( rections Administration and the Office of
Ombudsman for Corrections.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The Department, in keeping with the principles of
good administration, already has an effective
procedure for handling grievances. An ombudsman
outside the system with no operational responsibility
would be divisive, and would only increase the
problems of rehabilitation and control. At best,
this would be an expensive (at least $400, 000 per
year) duplication of existing services for which no
need has been demonstrated.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 1403 - Crown
Would require the Department of Health Care Services
to publish an annual compilation of certain
information relating to frequently prescribed
multiple-source drugs. It would require that the
listing be distributed to physicians, dentists,
pharmacists, consumer groups, and others.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The information required by AB 1403 is currently
published and available from a variety of sources,
including government agencies.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 1788 - Knox
Would create the California Archaeological Survey
within the Department of Conservation and the
California Archaeological Board within the Survey.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The creation of this new Survey is unnecessary to
meet the objectives of this measure. Senate Bill
215 (Chapter 827) requires a task force study of
the state's archaeological efforts, to be completed
by December 31, 1972. Since the study has been
requested by the legislature, it would seem advisable
to await the results of it before taking further
action.
"In addition, AB 1788 contains a number of technical
flaws, as well as serious questions regarding the
staffing and funding provisions contained in the bill
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2087 - Burton
Would require California to convert food stamp
bonuses into cash benefits for recipients of Old Age
Security, Aid to the Blind, and Aid to the Totally
Disabled, if and when federal law is changed to
prohibit welfare recipients from purchasing food
stamps.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The bill is predicated on an anticipated change in
the federal law. No such change appears likely prior
to mid-1973, if at all.
"In view of the uncertainty presently surrounding
this subject, and the inflexible position which this
bill would impose upon the state, I do not feel that
AB 2087 is appropriate.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
-4-
#716
AB 300 - Cory
Would permit those qualifying for the homeowners'
exemption but filing late without showing
reasonable cause for doing so---to receive 80
percent of the exemption by filing by December 10
of the year of a claim.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I already have approved SB 1006 (Chapter 1583)
which permits boards of supervisors to grant 80
percent of the homeowners' exemption to late
claimants who can show reasonable cause for failure
to file in a timely manner. I find no justification
to grant this exemption to those who fail to file
under the provisions of existing law without showing
reasonable cause for the late filing, as proposed by
this measure. In addition, legislation enacted in
1970 provided for the extension of the filing date
in two different types of situations. A maximum
6-month extension was allowed when a timely claim
was filed, but was defective because it lacked all
required information or the signature of the claimant
and a 15-day extension was allowed for those
individuals who filed a veterans' exemption which
was disallowed.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 732 - Brathwaite
Would provide that no public institution of higher
education may refuse admission to graduate programs
solely on the basis of sex. The bill would also
require governing boards of each segment of public
higher education to report annually to the legislatur
on the number and qualifications of male and female
applicants and enrollees in each graduate program.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I have no objections to the prohibition contained
in AB 732 relating to the refusal to admit students
to graduate programs solely on the basis of sex.
However, the requirement that public colleges and
universities report the qualifications of applicants
and enrollees in each graduate program is burdensome
and unnecessary.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 794 - Ralph
Would authorize the chief of the Division of Fair
Employment Practices or an attorney of the State Fair
Employment Practice Commission to file a verified
complaint, containing specified information concerning
unlawful employment practices, and would authorize an
employer whose employees refuse, or threaten to refuse
to cooperate with fair employment practice provisions
to file a verified complaint seeking assistance by
conciliation or other remedial action.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I find no compelling need to approve this measure.
Existing law already authorizes any person, including
employers, to file a complaint with the Commission.
Also the Commission, its Counsel, or Division Chief
can file complaints through the Attorney General's
office.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill ansigned," "
the governor said.
-5-
AB 30 - Warren
Would extend the jurisdiction of the Industrial
Welfare Commission for the purpose of setting a
minimum wage for men.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The author has informed me that as a practical
matter the number of employees affected would be
small, as most employees are covered by federal
minimum wage provisions and those not covered by
federal law are generally covered by equal pay
statutes. In view of the bill's very limited
application, I question the merit of reopening wage
orders, which would result in an additional cost to
the state of approximately $150,000.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 55 - Greene, B.
Provides that a state scholarship award winner may
use the scholarship at specified postsecondary
institutions in California in addition to those
institutions which offer two-year community college
or four-year college courses with accreditation by
the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I agree that a need exists to provide financial
assistance for technical and vocational students.
However, permitting persons who win a "state
scholarship" to use his scholarship in postsecondary
institutions would raise a false promise of aid to
vocational students which, for all practical purposes
cannot be realized under the present academic
selection standards. Under present selection
standards for the State Scholarship Program, only
3 percent of high school graduates qualify for state
scholarships. The winners normally have a 3.5 grade
point average and are academically qualified for
four-year institutions of higher education.
Therefore, it is extremely unlikely that such winners
would use their awards in other than two and four-
year academic institutions.
"I have directed my staff to develop an approach
which will provide assistance to high school graduate
who desire occupational, technical, or vocational
education.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 232 - Dunlap
Would direct the Coordinating Council for Higher
Education, in cooperation with the Trustees of the
California State Colleges, to study the feasibility
and desirability of transferring the California
Maritime Academy to the State College System. The
measure would appropriate $65,000 to the Coordinating
Council for this purpose.
REASON FOR VETO:
"This bill is unnecessary. In vetoing AB 705, I
established a task force to study a number of
alternatives relating to the future of the California
Maritime Academy. The task force effort is now under
way. Its representation is broadly based and include
the director of the Coordinating Council for Higher
Education. The scope of the task force effort is not
limited to the single alternative which this bill
seeks.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
-6-
#716
AB 2923 - Chacon
Would increase the minimum annual salary for
teachers.
REASON FOR VETO:
"California teachers are among the highest paid in
the country. The average California teacher's
salary in 1970-71 was $11,216 for ten months' work.
"This measure would mandate increased costs on local
school districts, without taking into consideration
the districts' ability to pay, or local cost of
living conditions, which vary throughout the state.
"In addition, this measure could have the effect of
causing an upward adjustment of teachers' salaries
statewide, regardless of whether or not a district
is already paying above the proposed minimum.
Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the
governor said.
SB 835 - Alquist
Would appropriate $3,350,000 to augment the Budget
Act of 1971 for the purposes of community college
extended opportunity programs.
REASON FOR VETO:
"This augmentation is unnecessary because additional
federal funds, which were anticipated in my original
1971-72 budget, have been made available for
community college extended opportunity programs in
the amount of approximately $3 million. In addition,
$1.2 million of federal national defense student loar
money has been made available for student loans by
the community colleges.
"Furthermore, this measure attempts to augment a
nonexistent item in the Budget Act of 1971.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
SB 998 - Petris
Authorizes an increase in the existing permissive
school override tax to pay deficits incurred in any
prior year for school meals for needy children.
REASON FOR VETO:
"As I have said before, I strongly support local
decision making and local control of public education
in California. The constant pressure for additional
permissive school tax overrides or the extension of
such overrides erodes this control by taking from the
voters the right to participate directly in the
determination of spending priorities at the local
level.
"In addition, if this measure were approved it would
permit school districts to ignore the principles of
good management by disregarding budget ceilings.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said,
SB 1196 - Zenovich
Would require, rather than authorize, school district
to provide specified programs for educationally
handicapped minors who reside within the district.
REASON FOR VETO:
"Existing law permits school districts and county
superintendents of schools to operate classes for
educationally handicapped minors. Parents and
guardians of educationally handicapped minors may
also receive tuition payments for educating such
minors in public or private nonsectarian schools when
no special educational facilities and services are
available through local and state programs. A
comprehensive review of the effectiveness of programs
already being operated by the various school district
should first be undertaken before mandating the
obligations this bill would impose on all local schoo
districts.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the
governor said.
- 7 -
AB 275 - Burton
Wo
d establish a state progr of rental assistance
in private accommodations para iel to the federal
rent subsidy program established by Section 23 of
the United States Housing Act of 1937.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I question the wisdom of the state's entering into
a program of this type when the action taken by the
federal government since 1968 has been directed
toward assisting low income families in obtaining
new housing through home ownership and mortgage
financing for low-income rental projects.
"Further, I question the reality of approving a
measure which can only be implemented by the
expenditure of millions of dollars of taxpayers'
funds at a time when the state is faced with the
need to find additional revenues just to meet
current obligations.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 1098 - Z'berg
Makes provisions for increased retirement benefits
for local safety members of the Public Employees'
Retirement System applicable to all contracting
agencies on July 1, 1973.
REASON FOR VETO:
"Cities and counties already are authorized to
provide the level of retirement benefits proposed
by this bill. Each local entity is free to provide
such benefits based on local needs and financial
resources. The measure, in my opinion, tends to
negate the 'meet and confer' provisions of existing
law as they relate to local safety members.
"The bill would impose a substantial burden on the
local property taxpayer at a time when property
taxes have reached alltime highs. It is estimated
that this measure would result in increased property
taxes to city residents of more than $30 million
annually.
"The bill also commits the General Fund to an annual
expenditure of up to $10 million for at least 30
years, at a time when the state is experiencing
extreme difficulty in funding programs which command
a high priority.
"Finally, this legislation would cause interference
with local government employer-employee relations
and an imposition by the state of substantial
additional costs on local government. Any benefit
structure should be a result of the negotiation
process between the public employer and affected
employees. Employee benefits for employees of local
government should not be mandated by the state.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 1204 - Townsend
Would require contractors on a construction project
to maintain adequate emergency first aid medical
treatment for the employees.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The legislative counsel is of the opinion that the
phrase 'adequate emergency first aid medical
treatment' means having medical personnel and
equipment to administer emergency first aid. This
could mean having a doctor, nurse, or other medical
personnel trained to give medical treatment, and
having facilities equipped to permit emergency first
aid treatment by medical personnel. While this
result may not have been intended, it would impose
an unwarranted burden on contractors. The subject
of first aid and medical attention on job sites is
already covered by Construction Safety Order 1512.
I would suggest that the interested parties meet with representatives of
the Department of Industrial Relations to determine the need, if any,
for legislation in this subject area.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned, # the governor said.
- 8 -
#716
AB 1355 - Fenton
Would extend mandatory unemployment coverage to
agricultural workers.
REASON FOR VETO:
"While I actively support unemployment insurance for
farm workers on a national basis, I cannot approve
legislation that would further increase the
competitive disadvantages faced by California's
agricultural community.
"The benefits payable under AB 1355 will exceed farm
employer taxes by at least $37 million, which will
have to be financed from taxes paid by nonfarm
employers who already are among the highest taxes
in the country.
"The U.S. Department of Labor is presently drafting
legislation to provide unemployment insurance
coverage for farm workers on a nationwide basis.
I intend to support this proposal when it is
presented to the Congress.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2177 - Brathwaite Would require the Director of Health Care Services
to establish authorization criteria for Medi-Cal
consultants to expedite the movement of long-term
care patients from hospitals to nursing homes.
REASON FOR VETO:
"This proposal is not necessary since current
regulations and guidelines concerning hospital
admissions, length-of-stay in a hospital, and
nursing home admissions already deal with the proble
set forth in the bill. The Department of Health
Care Services, as the single state agency for the
Medicaid program in California, is obligated by the
Federal Social Security Act to assure that payments
and services are at appropriate levels.
Authorizations of hospital stays beyond that
considered medically necessary by both the attending
physician and Medi-Cal consultant are not presently
granted.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
- 9 -
#716
SB 57 - Lagomarsino W. Id increase retirement ber. its for those state
employees or their survivors who retired on or
before December 31, 1969.
REASON FOR VETO:
Retired members of the Public Employees' Retirement
System now have a permanent and automatic cost of
living program as a result of legislation I signed
into law. Under this law, retired members of the
System already are eligible for automatic and
continuous increases related to rises in the cost of
living in the future. Thes year covered retirees
received a 6 percent increase and in April of the
coming year will receive a 3.6 percent increase.
"I do not believe that one-time increases in
retirement allowances as proposed by this bill are
appropriate when a permanent program has been
instituted.
"The rdtirement allowance increase included in the bill
would have been operative only if legislation had
been enacted at the 1971 regular session to increase
General Fund revenues beyond that amount necessary
to maintain programs in dollar amounts allocated in
the 1971 Budget Act. General Fund revenues were
not increased as required by this bill.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the
governor said.
AB 2552 - Moretti
Creates a Victim Compensation Commission to investi-
gate and adjudicate claims of citizens who are
victims of violent crimes, raises the maximum
compensation to $25,000 per claim, and creates
a Victim Compensation Fund.
REASON FOR VETO:
"This measure proposes the creation of a new
commission to administer a program which is now
administered by the State Board of Control. I see
no reason to establish a new commission. The Board
of Control is currently performing this service in an
admirable manner.
"This measure also removes the test of need and
revises upward the awards limits. Liberalizing such a
program of indemnification will elicit potentially
thousands of new claims each year. There is serious
doubt that the proposed penalty assessment will
support such a program. I am convinced that the
present program best serves the total interests of
the State, as it indemnifies only those persons who
are truly in need of such indemnification.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," " the
governor said.
# # # #
- 10 -
EJG
OFFICE OF THE GOVERN
RELEASE: Imme
ate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-22-71
#717
Governor Ronald Reagan has signed legislation designed to
control snowmobiles, motorcycles, dune buggies and other passenger-
carrying off-highway motor vehicles while it also provides for the
development of special recreational facilities for those who use them;
The measure, (AB 2342) by Assemblyman Gene Chappie, (R-Cool)
will require the registration and licensing of the vehicles with the
fees to go into a special Off-Highway Vehicle Fund for the development
of trails and other special recreational facilities by the Department
of Parks and Recreation and local governments.
"This legislation will provide controls to prevent depredation
by those few riders who have been responsible for destruction of the
environment; will provide public facilities for the more than three
million motoring enthusiasts who are concerned with the environment and
provide facilities for them to use," the governor said.
The law, which will become effective July 1, 1972, also requires
the vehicles to be equipped with adequate mufflers.
Under the law, a $15 fee will be required every two years. Of
the amount, $5 will go to the Department of Motor Vehicles for
certification and issuance of license plates; $6 will go to the
Department of Parks and Recreation's Off-Highway Vehicle Fund for
development of trails and other facilities, and $4 will go to the
counties of the state in lieu of other state and local funds, for
managing and maintaining off-highway facilities.
#####
OFFICE OF THE GOVERN
RELEASE: Imme ite
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-22-71
#718
Governor Ronald Reagan today appointed five new members and
reappointed 11 members to the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board.
For the North Coastal Region, the governor named Gordon W. Miller
551 Wikiup Drive, Santa Rosa, to succeed George A. Dinsmore of Fortuna,
and reappointed Harry Crebbin of 610 Jackson Street, Yreka. Both are
Republicans.
Miller, chief engineer and manager for the Sonoma County Water
Agency, will represent water supply, and Crebbin, manager of the
Yreka Chamber of Commerce, a board member since 1967, represents
municipal government.
For the Central Coastal Region, William B. Burr, Jr., of
909 Foothill Road, Ojai, was appointed to replace Mrs. Jean Auer,
formerly of Santa Barbara, who now serves on the San Francisco Bay
Region Board.
Burr, president of Industrial Tools Inc., of Ojai, will
represent the public.
Reappointed were Eugene E. Brendlin, 5520 Vida Street,
Atascadero, retired manager of the California State Polytechnic
College Foundation, and Floyd M. Grigory, P. O. Box 173, San Ardo,
a farmer.
Brendlin, a board member since 1967, represents water supply,
while Grigory, who has served since 1971, represents irrigated agriculture
Both are Republicans.
For the Los Angeles Region, Allan Harris of 4250 Park Newport,
Newport Beach, was named to succeed Thomas H. Gaines, Jr., of Costa
Mesa, who has resigned.
Harris, manager of the In Plant Product Development Corporation
of Long Beach, will represent industrial waste. He is not registered
with a political party.
Reappointed was Arthur E. Bruington of 363 West Hermosa Drive,
San Gabriel, Chief Deputy Engineer for the Los Angeles County Flood
Control District. A member since 1968, he represents counties. He
is a Republican.
For the Central Valley Region. Clifford C. Wisdom of 1179 Elmwood
Avenue, Stockton, was named to replace Robert L. Wall of Madera.
-1-
#718
Wisdom, chairman of the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors,
will represent county government. He is a Republican.
Reappointed was Marvin E. Ray, 2317 Monticello Avenue, Modesto,
deputy city manager of Modesto. A member since 1971, he represents
municipal government. He is a Republican.
For the Colorado River Basin Region, Stuart W. Gummer of
82299 Sierra Avenue, Indio, was named to succeed E. F. Bevens of Blythe
who has resigned.
Gummer, an Indio civic leader and sporting goods shop owner,
will represent wildlife and recreation on the board. He is a
Republican.
Reappointed for the Colorado River Basin Region were Keith
H. Ainsworth, 81960 Lancer Way, Indio, and Harry Schmitz, 43900
Primrose Drive, Palm Desert.
Ainsworth, assistant general manager of the Coachella Valley
Water District, represents water users. He has served on the board
since 1968. He is a Republican.
Schmitz, senior planner for the Riverside County Planning
Department, has represented county government on the board since
1969. He is a Republican.
Reappointed for the Santa Ana Region were Everett L. Grubb,
6979 Palm Court, Riverside, and Everett C. Ross, 2529 Piedmont Drive,
Riverside.
Grubb, past president of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District, has served on the board since 1971, representing county
government. He is a Republican.
Ross, public utilities director for the City of Riverside, has
represented municipal government on the board since 1964. He is a
Republican.
Reappointed for the San Diego Region were Einer A. May, 12448
Vaughan Road, Poway, and William S. Tellam, P. O. Box 615, Julian.
May, vice president of the Poway Municipal Water District, and
Tellman, a rancher, have served on the board since 1968. May has
represented municipal government while Tellam has represented irrigated
agriculture. Both are Republicans.
# # #
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
MEMO TO TH PRESS
Sacramento, Californ
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
12-23-71
# 719
Governor Ronald Reagan announced today that he has vetoed the
following bills:
AB 1970 - McCarthy
Authorizes a school district maintaining a com-
munity college to exempt from payment of all or
part of nonresident tuition fees, nonresidents
who are both citizens and residents of a foreign
country and hold "J" visas rather than non-
residents who are both citizens and residents of
a foreign country.
REASON FOR VETO:
"This bill, if approved, would chapter out the
provisions of SB 1607 (Chapter 629). SB 1607
modifies the formula for computation of nonresi-
dent tuition charges at the community colleges.
It is important to the community colleges that
the provisions of SB 1607 remain in effect.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2018 - Chacon
Changes the observance of Admission Day from
the 9th day of September to the second Monday
in September.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I have no objections to AB 2018. However, it
would chapter out a significant provision of
the Bank Extraordinary Situation Closing Act
(Chapter 932). I have requested that repre-
sentatives of the banking industry work closely
with the author and the school administrators'
associations to insure that a bill containing
the provisions of AB 2018 is enacted early next
session.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2456 - Hayes
Requires the retirement board of a retirement
system, established pursuant to the County
Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, to file a
disability retirement application for a safety
member who is also a department head under
specified circumstances.
REASON FOR VETO:
"AB 2456 is intended to affect only one county
employee. No compelling evidence has been
presented to me which supports the need for this
special legislation.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned, 11
the governor said.
AB 2716 - Warren
Requires a drastic restructuring of the Los
Angeles Unified School District's Board of
Education.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The need for meaningful public involvement in
the decision making process of the Los Angeles
Unified School District's Board of Education is
desirable. However, there are compelling
reasons why this particular measure should be vetoed. The last minute
amendment restructuring the Board of Education is not in the interest of
public involvement. The bill, as amended on December 1, would require
an election of all eleven board members in the Spring of 1973. This
election would not only include the four new members to be added, but
also the existing members who would have over half of their term yet to
run. Such a procedure constitutes poor public administration.
-1-
#719
AB 2716 (continued)
"Furthermore, AB 2716 violates the principle
of home rule. It runs counter to the California
Constitution, in that the Charter of the City
of Los Angeles, in accordance with the Constitu-
tion, provides for the number of board members
and for their manner of election.
"A shift to the election of board members by
districts would not guarantee the election of a
minority group representative, even though that
is the intent of the amendment. At the same
time, it would almost certainly guarantee the
creation of pressures which would tend to equal-
ize school expenditures by electoral districts,
rather than allowing for the expenditure of funds
to meet the most pressing student needs. This
result most certainly would work to the disad-
vantage of minority pupils.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2971 - Miller
Allows a criminal under a life sentence to be
discharged from parole after five years.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The persons covered by this bill are first
degree murderers, habitual criminals and kidnap-
rape felons. The law requires now that these
persons remain on parole for life unless they
are pardoned or their sentences are commuted by
the governor.
"Under this bill, these serious offenders could
be released from parole supervision without the
governor's authorization.
"I believe that to remove this responsibility,
which the law has vested in the governor for
many years, would eliminate an important safe-
guard desired and expected by society.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2987 - Z'berg
Creates the State Board of Registration for
Professional Foresters.
REASON FOR VETO:
"While I approve of the bill's stated objectives,
I believe the need for accomplishing them through
the licensing program, which this bill proposes,
has not been demonstrated. Alternative methods
should be explored which do not involve this
type of entry by the state into a new area of
regulation.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 3066 - Z'berg
Provides for submission to the voters at the
1972 General Election of the State Beach, Park,
Recreational, and Historical Facilities Bond Act of 1972, which, if
adopted, would authorize issuance of bonds in the amount of $250,000,000
to provide funds to acquire and establish beaches, parks, recreational
facilities, and historical resources.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I recognize the great need for more parks at
both the state and local level, and I support
the concept of acquiring and developing parks
through the issuance of bonds.
-2-
#719
AB 3066 (continued)
"The Director of Parks and Recreation informs me
ample funds are already available to carry on an
expansion of the State Park System for the next
two years. These monies consist of Federal Land
and Water Conservation funds of approximately
$20 million; an unexpended balance of the 1964
Bond Act of some $25 million; $60 million in
bonds voted in 1970 under Proposition 20; and
approximately $25 million for park and beach
acquisition from income tax withholding. These
funds total some $130 million.
"I intend to propose a new bond issue for parks
and recreation when the need warrants.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
SB 60 - Moscone
Establishes a procedure for late registration
applicable to all statewide elections or special
elections to fill a congressional or state
legislative vacancy. It would provide that late
registration for such elections would begin on
the 53rd day before election and end on the 19th
day before election.
REASON FOR VETO:
"SB 60 would impose an unwarranted additional
burden on county clerks and registrars of voters.
The present Elections Code requirement that
registration be completed prior to 53 days
before an election facilitates the proper con-
duct of elections.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
SB 108 - Mills
Requires that $60,000 per month from the newly
established Transportation Planning and Research
Account be made available to the Department of
Public Works for allocation to eligible bicycle
land and equestrian path projects by cities,
counties, and state agencies.
REASON FOR VETO:
"Such monies as prove to be available to the
fund established by SB 325 (Chapter 1400) will
represent for the first time an ability by this
state to fund transportation planning which is
genuinely multi-modal in its scope. It is my
belief that appropriations from this fund should
be preceded by a careful examination of all
competing claims on it. This measure prematurely
allocates a specific amount of money without the
benefit of the kind of examination, which I
believe should be undertaken first.
"I already have approved legislation (Chapter
1361) which authorizes local government to
establish exclusive paths for bicycles, and
authorizes the designing of such facilities into
freeway projects whenever the master plan of the
local agency requires it.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
SB 1467 - Dymally
Establishes a commission to study the need for
and status of medical schools in this state and
appropriates $250,000 from the contingent fund of the Board of Medical
Examiners for this purpose.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The Board of Medical Examiners has informed me
that the intent of this measure can be accom-
plished under the auspices of AB 2427 (Chapter 1498, Statutes of 1971)
which authorizes the Board of Medical Examiners to evaluate medical
school curricula and appropriates $125,000 for that purpose. Approval
of this measure would result in two independent studies, duplicating a
substantial portion of the same subject matter.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the governor said.
-3-
#719
AB 728 - Brathwaite
Authorizes a surviving spouse to file a joint
state income tax return for two years following
the year of death of the husband or wife. It
It would have become operative only if a system
of payroll withholding had been enacted at the
1971 regular session of the legislature.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I have no objections to this proposal. However,
AB 728 has no legal effect since a system of
payroll withholding was not enacted at the 1971
regular session as required by Section 3 of the
bill. I will support this proposal if it is
introduced again next year.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2037 - Greene (Bill) Establishes the Watts Industrial Fair in desig-
nated area of Los Angeles County.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The 48th District Agricultural Association, of
which the area of the proposed Watts Industrial
Fair is a part, is located in the urban area of
the City of Commerce. This district fair is in
the process of re-orienting its direction toward
consumer and industrial education. Thus, the
advantages proposed for the Watts fair would be
available through the 48th District Fair.
"This bill might also set a precedent of estab-
lishing new fairs at a time when a study is now
under way to improve the efficiency of all state
supported fairs.
"This bill will add an annual cost of $65,000 to
the fair program for operational support of the
new fair, thus reducing General Fund revenue in
the same amount. In addition, the undetermined
amount of money needed for acquisition of land
and the construction of facilities will reduce
the funds available to other fairs for capital
outlay purposes in the same amount.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2282 - Thomas
Requires the Department of Navigation and Ocean
Development to enter into an agreement with the
City of Avalon for construction or modification
of a steamer pier within Avalon harbor, subject
to certification by the Director of Finance that
the city is financially capable of repaying a
specified loan.
REASON FOR VETO:
"There already are statutory authority and fiscal
resources available to construct feasible boat-
ing facilities within Avalon Harbor. The agree-
ment required by this bill is in derogation of
the department's statutory responsibility to
approve only those loans based on economic and
engineering feasibility considerations.
"The Department of Navigation and Ocean Develop-
ment already is working with the City of Avalon
to enhance the benefits of harbor improvement
projects constructed with $2.5 million in loans
from the State Harbors and Watercraft Revolving
Fund. Additionally, the department has offered
the city an emergency storm damage loan to repair
recent damage.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," "
the governor said.
-4-
#719
SB 216 - Way
Increases the membership of the Adult Authority
from 9 to 12, and would specify qualifications
for membership.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The addition of three new members to the Adult
Authority, at an annual cost of more than
$145,000, cannot be justified at a time when
the number of inmates in California's correc-
tional institutions continues to decline. In
January, 1969, there were 28,600 inmates in the
state's prisons. Today, the total is less than
21,000.
"In addition, a governor should have the widest
latitude in considering appointments to the
Adult Authority. To restrict his discretion by
specifying qualifications for membership is
unwarranted and could lead to a diminution of
the board's effectiveness in considering inmates'
terms and their individual problems.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
SB 433 - Collier
Authorizes the California State College Trustees,
upon approval of the student body, to establish
an activities fee to support instructionally
related programs at those state colleges where
a student body organization is not in effect.
REASON FOR VETO:
"Instructionally related activities on campus
have usually included art exhibits, dramatic
productions, concerts, journalism, creative writ-
ing activities, and intercollegiate athletics.
These activities are generally associated with
individual courses, or in some cases, blocks of
courses, and are considered by instructors to
be as central to meaningful education as chemis-
try laboratory classes are to chemistry. A part
of these activities are generally funded from
student body activity fees.
"This measure is an attempt to fund instruction-
ally-related activities at those state colleges
where student fees are not available because
student body organizations have been voted out
by the students.
"I am vetoing this measure at the request of the
Trustees of the California State Colleges who
feel that this measure does not present a work-
able solution. It provides that the trustees
may institute a fee only 'upon the approval of a
majority of the students who vote in a formally
constituted election.
"Such a provision solves nothing for the opera-
tion of instructionally related activities on a
campus, inasmuch as students already can estab-
lish student body organizations and student
activity fees under existing provisions of the
Education Code, 'upon the approval of a majority
of the students who vote in a formally constituted
election.
"Students at a college without a student govern-
ment in existence now, can by majority vote, re-
institute this approach to student body fees and
thus impose the fee. Therefore, such a change
to the code adds nothing to alleviate any current
hardships of funding these instructionally
related programs.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
-5-
#719
Governor Reagan also announced today that he has signed the
following bills, with certain deletions or reductions in appropriations:
AB 792 - Ralph
Includes among the duties of the State Fair
(Chapter 1814)
Employment Practice Commission the duty to
investigate, approve, and certify equal employ-
ment opportunity programs submitted to it by
contractors on state-awarded public works con-
tracts in excess of $200,000, and to fix and
collect fees necessary for the cost thereof.
AB 1455 - Z'berg
Provides Unemployment Insurance benefits to
(Chapter 1815)
full-time employees of the University of Cali-
fornia and State Colleges who are laid off after
March 1, 1971, through December 31, 1971, for
reasons of economy.
(The governor deleted the $350,000 appropriation
contained in Section 4 of AB 1455 because the
unemployment insurance benefits provided by
the bill can be funded from existing appropria-
tions.)
AB 2647 - Lanterman
Provides special procedure for disposition of
(Chapter 1817)
mentally retarded criminal defendants found not
mentally competent to stand trial.
AB 3004 - Vasconcellos
Appropriates $80,000 to the Regents of the
(Chapter 1818)
University of California to be expended for the
drug abuse information project.
(The governor reduced the appropriation from
$80,000 to $10,000. The University of California
reports that all funds appropriated for the
drug abuse information project have been expended
and that $10,000 is necessary to continue the
program in 1971-72. The balance of the appro-
priation contained in AB 3004 is intended to
implement the evaluation phases of the project
during the current fiscal year. Financial
support for the evaluation phase of the project
can come from funds already appropriated for
public service or organized research programs
of the University.
# # #
-6-
EJG
OFFICE OF THE GOVERN(
RELEASE: Immed. ce
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-23-71
#720
Governor Ronald Reagan today announced the reappointment of
Alfonso L. Romero, San Jose attorney, and Robert N. Rouch, Fresno
certified public accountant, to four-year-terms on the California
Veterans Board
Romero, who lives at 625 Sobrato Drive, Campbell, has served
on the board since 1968, while Rouch, who lives at 2165 18th Avenue,
Kingsburg, has served since 1969. Both men are Republicans.
The appointments are subject to Senate confirmation.
Members of the board receive $20 per day while on official
duty.
######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERN
RELEASE: Immed te
Sacramento, Californ
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-23-71
#721
Governor Ronald Reagan today named Paul J. Clifton, projects
coordinator for the Resources Agency, to the Western Interstate
Nuclear Board.
Created by 1968 legislation, the board considers and recommends
policies to be followed in nuclear opportunities and problems in the
13 western states.
Clifton, 51, who began his state career in the Department of
Water Resources in 1965, has served as Nuclear Coordinator for the
state since 1969 and has represented the secretary of Resources on the
State Environmental Quality Study Council.
He is married and has two children. The family lives at 3007
Sandhurst Court, Sacramento.
Clifton is a Republican.
The post pays necessary expenses.
######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNO
RELEASE: Immed.
be
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-23-71
#722
Governor Ronald Reagan today appointed Los Angeles County
Assistant Counsel Alexander R. Early III to the Los Angeles County
Superior Court.
Early, 54, a Republican, will receive an annual salary of
$33,396. He will succeed Judge John S. Frazer who has retired.
Prior to joining the Los Angeles County Counsel's office in
1957, Early served as an assistant United States attorney in
Los Angeles and as a senior attorney for the State Department of Public
Works in Los Angeles.
He previously had practiced law privately in Los Angeles since
1947.
A graduate of Cornell University, Early earned his law degree
from Harvard Law School.
He has served as a judge pro-tem of the Los Angeles County
Superior Court and is a member of the Los Angeles County Bar Association,
the State Bar of California, the Federal Bar Association, the American
Society of Appraisers, the American Board of Trial Advocates, the
American Right of Way Association, the State Association of County
Appraisers and other professional, civic and service groups.
In addition, he is author of numerous works that have
appeared in legal publications.
He and his wife, Mary, have three children. The family lives
in La Canada.
#######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERN
RELEASE: Imme
te
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-23-71
#723
Governor Ronald Reagan today named one new member and reappointed
three other members of the State Scholarship and Loan Commission.
The new member is Dr. Edward Simonsen, superintendent of the Kern
Joint Junior College District. He will fill the unexpired term of
Charles F. Herndon of San Anselmo, who has resigned. The term ends in
October, 1973.
Dr. Simonsen, a Republican, will represent junior colleges on the
commission. He lives at 3801 Country Club Drive, Bakersfield.
Reappointed to four-year-terms were Dr. Fred L. Casmin, professor
of speech at Pepperdine College, Dr. Charles J. Dirksen, dean of the
Graduate School of Business at the University of Santa Clara, and
Erskine J. Sandys, manager of the Pacific Telephone Company at La
Jolla. All are Republicans and have served since 1967.
Dr. Casmir, a resident of Inglewood, represents private schools
while Dr. Dirksen, who lives at 1465 Calaveras Avenue, San Jose,
represents private universities and Sandys of 5928 Beaumont Avenue,
La Jolla, represents the public.
The appointments are subject to Senate confirmation.
Commissioners serve four-year terms and receive necessary
expenses.
#####
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERN
MEMO TO THE PRF
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-24-71
#724
The following is the text of a letter from Governor Ronald
Reagan to Lawrence Robinson, Jr., Chairman of the Board of Control:
"I have just learned of the award of $5,000 approved by the
Board of Control for an employee of the Department of Water Resources,
for a suggestion which proposed a design change in the Oroville-
Thermalito power generating complex. This change, I understand, has
contributed to an anticipated increase of salable power of more than
$26,000,000 over the 31 year period of the contract.
"It is important to our continuing efforts to obtain, from all
sources, those constructive ideas which result in reducing the cost of
operating our state government. I have already taken note that the
state's Merit Award suggestion program plays an important part in the
orderly submission and evaluation of ideas, contributed by state
employees. Therefore, we must do everything possible to keep open this
channel for the flow of ideas.
"Recognizing that cash awards for adopted suggestions are not,
in themselves, the only incentives for the contribution of helpful
suggestions, I do feel that those employees who submit their ideas
through the suggestion program, and who meet all the standards for
award eligibility, should reasonably expect to receive the cash rewards
we offer as inducements for doing SO.
I hope that you and the other members of your board will agree
with this reasoning, and will wish to review your action on this award,
to determine if this level of recognition is in the best interests of
employee morale and employee willingness to continue to contribute their
valuable ideas."
######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERN
RELEASE: Im liate
Sacramento, Californ
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-28-71
#725
Here is the text of a letter from Governor Ronald Reagan in
response to a telegram from Governor William G. Milliken of Michigan
suggesting a wager on the outcome of the January 1, Rose Bowl Game
between the University of Michigan and Stanford University:
"I accept your wager on the outcome of the Rose Bowl Game,
although it is difficult to decide what to put up against your Michigan
wine and snowballs.
"At first, I considered wagering some oranges. (California, as
you know, abounds with oranges when your state is coated with snow).
"Then, I thought of offering a bouquet of fragrant California
roses. (You are aware, of course, that roses bloom in profusion in our
state when Michigan bushes are decorated with icicles).
"My problem, as you can well understand, is a matter of selection
since California is blessed with an overabundance of all of nature's
gifts.
"But now that you have offered a bottle of Michigan wine, packed
in Michigan snowballs, I will attempt to keep things more or less equal.
"In the highly unlikely event that Michigan beats Stanford, I
will send you a bottle of California wine packed in snowballs made from
the pure, pristine flakes that fall gently on the slopes of our high
Sierra. (California, I don't have to remind you, has the finest wines
and the best winter sports country in the world).
"If this meets with your approval, the bet is on. But, please
don't bring the Michigan snowballs to Pasadena on January 1...they will
melt in our warm, golden California sunshine!"
#####
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERN
RELEASE: In ediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-28-71
#726
Governor Ronald Reagan today announced the reappointment
of Roy E. Reynolds of Long Beach and Roy E. Parker of San Diego to the
State Board of Accountancy in the Department of Consumer Affairs.
Reynolds, a Norwalk accountant, has served on the board since
1968. He lives at 3144 Val Verde, Long Beach. He is a Republican.
Parker, a San Diego accountant, has been a member of the board
since 1970. He lives at 2705 Granada, San Diego. He is a Republican.
Both men represent public accountants on the board.
Board members receive $25 per diem plus expenses and serve
four year terms.
#########
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVER
R
RELEASE: In diate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-28-71
#727
Governor Ronald Reagan today appointed Robert A. Houghton,
director of the Division of Law Enforcement in the State Department
of Justice, to the board of the Califo rnia Crime Technological Research
Foundation.
Houghton, 58, prior to his appointment to the justice department
post in July of this year, was assistant chief and director of operations
for the Los Angeles Police Department.
He will succeed Orville J. Hawkins of Sacramento, on the
foundation board, representing the justice department.
Houghton, a Republican, lives at 13305 Arminta Street, North
Hollywood.
The appointment is subject to Senate confirmation.
Members of the foundation serve at the pleasure of the governor
and receive necessary expenses.
#######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
Sacramento, Californ
MEMO 1 THE PRESS
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-29-71
Governor Reagan will hold a press conference on the subject of
reapportionment tomorrow, Thursday, December 30, at 11 a.m., in
Los Angeles at the Century Plaza Hotel (Pacific Palisades Room).
####
EJG
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immedia+
Sacramento, Californ:
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-29-71
#728
Governor Ronald Reagan today issued the following New Year
Message:
"The New Year is a time for reflection and resolve. It is a
time to look back upon the road we traveled and to look forward to the
path we must follow.
"As we begin our journey into 1972, let us resolve that we
will continue to walk the path of peace with justice. And let us
remember that each of us, with every step we take, has the responsibility
to mark the trail toward a lasting peace, toward brotherhood and
toward harmony between man and nature."
####
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE:
Im
ediate
Sacrament Californi
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
12-30-71
#729
Governor Ronald Reagan today issued the following statement:
"When the legislature adjourned its regular session early this
month without complying with its constitutional mandate to reapportion
the Assembly, Senate and Congressional districts, I immediately called
them back. In doing so, I shared the hopes of all Californians that
cheir elected representatives would put aside strictly selfish, parti-
san interests and instead work out a fair plan putting the interests
of the people and their communities first.
"But our hopes quickly faded as once again the legislative process
deteriorated into blatant partisanship. The Democrats, who control
the legislature, were in a position to work out a good and fair plan
giving the highest priority to preserving community interests and fair
representation for ethnic minorities.
"Regrettably, the Democratic leadership ignored these and other
important factors. So they drew tortuous boundary lines around arti-
ficial and bizarre shaped districts aimed solely at perpetuating them-
selves in office.
"The Democrats made no secret of the fact that their bills were
totally partisan---and therefore unfair to their Republican colleagues.
Far worse, however, was the unfair way in which these gerrymandered
bills split communities throughout the state and minimized representa-
tion of minority groups who hoped that finally their particular concerns
might be met.
unsupportable
"These bills did such odd and
things as placing the same
people in two different districts at the same time through overlapping
boundaries, and using precinct boundaries instead of census tract lines.
That makes it impossible to prove a district has equal population
because precincts only show party registration.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has held that legislatures must prove that
they have made a good faith effort to achieve substantial equality
etween districts according to population. It has also been held by
other courts throughout the country that a reapportionment plan can or
should give attention to contiguity, compactness, preservation of
communities of interest, avoidance of partisan gerrymanders, protection
of the rights of minority groups, and access between different regions
within a district.
-1-
#729
"These bills clearly fall short of these standards.
"I would be derelict in my responsibility as governor to sign
these bills into law. I cannot take pleasure, however, in announcing
that I have today vetoed these three bills.
"Because of the seeming impasse of the legislature and its
inability to act, at least so far, I sincerely hope the Reapportionment
Commission under the leadership of the lieutenant governor, will con-
tinue its studies.
"Our goal is still a fair reapportionment something California
has not had for many years.
"Out of all our deliberations, including the work of the Reappor-
tionment Commission and the legislature, we can still make a new and
positive beginning toward preventing the difficulties we have experienced
on reapportionment difficulties which have cast the entire
governmental process into disrepute.
"But more important, we can seek to assure the people of
California that they will be fairly and honestly represented in the
legislature and the congress. "
# # #
-2-
EJG
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
MEMO TO THE PRESS
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
12-30-71
#730
Enclosed are maps of various Assembly,
Senate and Congressional districts as proposed
by bills enacted by the Democratic-dominated
legislature. The following descriptions are
aimed at assisting you in seeing some of the
reasons for the governor's vetoes of these
bills. (The descriptions relate to maps that
are enclosed.)
(NOTE: For your information, special permission
has been granted for reproduction of
these maps. You will note that some of
the maps contain a copyright clause, but
special permission has been granted for
reproduction of them.)
(STATEWIDE MAP - CD 36)
The 36th district in Kings, Kern and San Luis Obispo counties has a
long arm with almost no population in it, and no road in it connecting
one end to the other, reaching all the way down the coastline to take
Goleta and Isla Vista out of Santa Barbara County. The people at the
end of this arm are effectively cut off from the rest of the district
and denied the opportunity for effective representation.
(ELOWUP OF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 17 MAP)
The 17th district in San Mateo and Santa Clara counties has a heavily
Mexican-American area on the east side of San Jose connected like an
appendage to the bulk of the district by a narrow corridor that splits
the downtown area of San Jose. The people at the end of this corridor
are discriminated against because they have little common interest with
the main part of the district, and are unnecessarily far removed from
the main part of the district.
-1-
#730
(ORANGE COUNTY BLOWUP MAP)
Orange County and the communities within it are unnecessarily divided
into six different congressional districts, instead of the slightly
over three full districts to which its population entitles it. This
decreases the effective voice of this growing area by putting most
Orange County residents in districts dominated by population centers
sometimes far removed in distance and interests from their own area.
(STATEWIDE MAP - SD 15)
The 15th district contains two large areas at opposite sides of the
state
one bordering on the Pacific Ocean and the other on the Arizona-
Nevada border connected only by an extremely narrow corridor through
a sparsely populated area of the Central Valley. These virtually non-
contiguous parts of the 15th district make effective communication
within the district unlikely and make effective representation unneces-
sarily difficult.
(BLOWUP OF SD 10)
The San Mateo portion of the 10th district is only technically con-
nected to the San Francisco and Marin portions across the waters of
San Francisco Bay, where the county boundaries meet. The voters of the
San Mateo portion of the district are unnecessarily separated from the
San Francisco and Marin portions, making representation for them more
difficult and less effective.
(BLOWUP OF SD 25)
The 25th district stretches along the length of the coastline from
Oxnard in Ventura County in the north in a sometimes very narrow
corridor south to the Palos Verdes peninsula in Los Angeles County.
Voters at one end of the district have few common interests with voters
at the other end and are unnecessarily separated in distance.
(BLOWUP OF SD 27)
The 27th district wanders in a narrow corridor across the heart of
Los Angeles, arbitrarily splitting local communities from Santa Monica
on the coast, through Culver City, Hollywood, Los Angeles, Glendale
and Pasadena to the boundary of the Angeles National Forest. This
is a blatant gerrymander for partisan political purposes, dividing
the voice of these local communities and needlessly confusing the
voter.
-2-
#730
(SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY - PARTS OF ADs 9, 10, 12 and 30)
San Joaquin County's 290,000 citizens are entitled to 1.16 Assemblymen
under the court-required equality standards. AB 12 would carve the
county and its principal city, Stockton, into parts of four districts,
only one of the incumbents of which is likely to be a resident of
San Joaquin County.
(BLOWUP OF AD 10)
The 10th district stretches between three widely-separated centers of
population- Contra Costa County, San Joaquin County in the Central
Valley and in San Jose at the southern end of the Bay. All are con-
nected by sparsely populated or unpopulated corridors. The residents
of these areas have few interests in common, but are denied effective
representation because of the widely-dispersed portions of the district
wandering around Central California and the Bay Area.
(BLOWUP OF AD 18)
The 18th district is comprised of two virtually non-contiguous parts of
the city of San Francisco, connected only by a corridor the width of a
street in an obvious gerrymander for political advantage. This has the
effect of virtually separating the 19th AD into two separate parts.
This is confusing to the voters of each district, makes effective rep-
resentation unnecessarily difficult, and needlessly divides local
communities of interest.
(STATEWIDE MAP - AD 31)
The 31st district contains part or all of Santa Cruz, San Benito,
Monterey, Fresno, Madera, and Merced counties. Coastal Santa Cruz
County contains virtually half the district's population and would
dominate the election of the district's Assemblyman, leaving the dis-
parate Central Valley and Sierra constituents effectively voiceless in
influencing their representative on matters of regional concern.
(BLOWUP MAP OF AD 69)
The 69th district, currently wholly within Orange County, is represented
by Assembly Democratic Caucus Chairman Kenneth Cory. Its peculiar
shape, dubbed a "Cory-Dor," is a clear effort to include every
Democrat
available/in at least a dozen cities in two counties.
# # #
-3-
PB
3
W
I
X
Lt
2
(6L
O
Assembly Districts
82
A
74
92
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. I2
08
R
75
Area Map
See L.A.
Z
09
19
EL
34
0
9
62
9
9.E
N
A
E
28
29
EE
12
34
9
of
23
£
33
01
3
02
22
£1
See S.F. Bay Map
N
21
01
9
6
£
+
to
2
110
N
O
9
3
B
0
Z
5
VALLEJO SOLAND
SAN RAFAEL
RICHMOND
MARIN
17
BERKELE
17
TRA
18
DAKLAND
SANEVRANCE
SAN FRANCISCO
20
10
ALAMEDA
PACIFICA
SAN LEANDRO
15
14
BURDINGAME
SAM
MATEO
FREMONT
REDWOOD
3
CITY
26
SAN MATEO
PALO
ALTO
23
-
LOS ALTOS
ASSEMBLY BILL NO 12
Mr.
Assembly Districts
24
MM
SAN JOSE
SANTA
22
25
SARATOGA
10
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
1:62,500
To
Line
s
Z
South Dig
&
-
& WA
-
A
#
18
N
N
N
A
5
-
E
D
C
O
O
20
I
19
MA
19
A
y
C
the
C
SAN FRANCISCO
BAY
A
McLAREN
South Beste
NAVAL SHIPYARD
18
P
0
****
OLYMPIC
COUNTRY
5
CLUB
Base
Map
furnished
as
by
the
ASSEMBLY BILL NO 12
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
the
consent
STOCKTON
MONO
LAKE
OSEMITE
TIONAL
Class Min.
OAKDALE
PARK
LAKE CROWLEY
STATES
STANIAL
MERCED
37
Thumk
GILROY
Certinal
Striped Min
MADERA
NATIONAL
PARK
Black
Mth
Gould
TULANE
VALLEY
GROVE
2
SEQUOIA MI
Whitney
31
NATIONAL
PARK
ASSEMBLY BILL NO 12
-
to
=
Assembly District 31
ING CITY
Base Map material furnished as a public service by the
National Automobile Club Copyright Owner. Reproduction
of this map is prohibited without consent of the copyright
Beld MI
owner.
/
INDIAN
ROBLES
Rute'Pk
10
Makland
Base Map material furnished as public service by the
California State Automobile Association Copyright Owner
Reproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of
the copyright owner.
10
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 12
Assembly District 10
TELER
ISLAND
STATEM
ISLAND
REK
SAN
VENICE
BLANCE
Telephone
MANDEVALLE
SEAND
THAT
TRACT
12
ISLAND
PALM
THEY
indian
Const
I
TRACT
-
*
ISLAND
ind
comer
Fabian
30
12
SALIDA
N
AQUEDUCT
(AAA)
HETCHY
NETCH
MODESTO
METCH
HETCHY
Spring
Assembly Districts
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ASSEMBLY BILL NO 12
Base Map material furnished as 1 public service by the
California State Automobile Association Copyright Owner.
-
Reproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of
the copyright owner.
62
62
41
64
47
42
41
43
48
&
61
147
54
58
544
60
59
56
7
48
to
45
49
B
SUBTA
40
non
SANTA
53
?
45
51
57
63
NUMBER
50
55
65
65
55
46
38
66
67
I
ISL
and
69
44
39
ASSEMBLY BILL NO 12
68
46
LONG
BEACH
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Assembly Districts
0
:
&
of
&
NORWALK
LA MIRADA
AMERICAN
BELLFLOWER
FULLERTON
LAKEWOOD
ANAHEIM
CYPRESS
9
ASSEMBLY BILL NO 12
Assembly District 69
ORANGE
GARDEN
GROVE
SANTA ANA
FOUNTAIN
O
0
-
X
3
W
68
A
Ot
88
R
98
SEE LOS ANGELES MAP
Z
0
0
91.
=
24
A
&
18.
@
SL
su
&
0
21
a
1
SEE SAN FRANCISCO MAP
N
ε
S.B. 2
SENATORIAL DISTRICTS
110
N
O
9
3
BE
O
SENATORIAL DISTRICTS
S.B. 2
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
1901VHVS.
21
El
OITY
01Vd
9
X119
000M038
INCLUDE
BURLINGAME
01
PACIFICA
Ы
ALAMEDA
6
NVS
83W838
L
NVS
VALLEIO
>
OCCIDENT
SEBASTOPOL
YOUNTVIL
CASTLE
Millsken
FREESTONE
THE
Rrs
BODEGA
BODEGA
BAY
BODEGA
T FORD
Wakes
CALIENTE
COTATI
avril(s)
SPRS
NAPA
Res
VERANO
2010
SONOMA
TWO
201
TEMELEC
ALLS
DILLON
25/116)
PETALUMA
32
IBAY
*VALLEJO
10
SOLAND
CONTRA
COSTA
x
DRAKES
SAN
RAFAEL
SB 2
AVE
SOBRANTE
RICHMOND
Briance
CERRITO
SENATORIAL
LAFAYET
Servey
DISTRICT 10
EMERYVILLE
Provide
Golden
Base Map material furnished as a public service by the
LAND
California State Automobile Association Copyright Owner.
Reproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of
SAN
ALAMEDA
the copyright owner.
FRANCISCO
Merred
FRANK
10
Legue
Salada
BURLINGAME
ANIDER
E
PEDRO
SAN
Pilarcites
MATEO
Lake
MOSS
Res
ELMONT
GRANADA
Filler Paint
SAN CARLOS
REDWOOD CITY
25
3
MOON BAY
MENLO
SEE
MAP
FOR
NORTHERN
PART
OF
OUNTY
23
-
21
COUNTY
VENTURA
9
25
20
28
32
30
Fires
COUNTY
KERN
COUNTY
33
S.B. 2
-
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
Senatorial Districts
37
LA County
In
NORTHERN PART OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY -
RIVER
Min
Santa Paula
SANTA
ANGELES
SUSANA
MOUNTAINS
***
Northridge
Canvany
Crescente
Oxnard
2
Canada
North
ML
Burbank
Altadena
Sierra
M
(e)
Glendale 1181 Pasadena
NS
Hollywood
Res.
Alhambra
Beverly
Monterey
Park
Angeles
City
Los
Angeles
Huntington
Park
PACIFIC
South
Gate
OCEAN
Lawndale
Compton
Norwalk
SENATE BILL NO. 2
Torrance
Senate District 25
Base Map material furnished as a public service by the
Automobile Club of Southern California Copyright Owner.
Reproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of
the copyright owner.
EL 1006
is
HILLROSE
ST.
1
ALL
MISSION
BIR PARK
BLVD
FOREST
HILLS
HB
SUNLAND
ANGELES
SRAPK
FOREST STA
COUNSE
STONEHURST
EL 1420
ST
ART ST.
1714
BLVD
seco
SUNI
ANANDA
Alroyo
MT DISAPPOINTMENT
PLUMME
BELLA
TUJUNGA
EL 5994
S1
5)
SAN CABRIEL PK
BROWN CANYON
6156
1730
BARRIER DAM
BROWN MTN
5752
ST
HIGHWAY HIGHLANDS
BARY
MT MARXHAM
EL 765
ST.
LA
TUNA
CANYON
SEPULVEDA
8
EL 1513
CRESCENTA
NATIONAL
VERDUGO
CANYADA
CREST
3/26
SB 2
VERDUGO CITY
AV
CANADA
ANGELES
COUNTRY
EL 1257
AK
EL 131.5
VERQUGO.BL
LA CANADA
RNSWORTH
MONTROSE
FLINTR
OAKMONT
a 1224
CLUB
SENATORIAL DISTRICT 27
BENESHIRE
ALTADENA
BRAND
PARK
AND
BANK
couse
NEW
MAGNOLIA
DRIVE
NIN
KENNETH
VERDUGO
8
PARK
BLVD
IA
CASA VERDUGO
MOUNT
GLENDALE
BLUID
Base Map material furnished as a public service by the
ALAMEDA
BLVD.
FLINT
Verdugo
VENTURA
CHASE
GROVE
BL
California State Automobile Association Copyright Owner.
GLENOAKS
PASA
ENA
EL
861
Reproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of
=
the copyright owner,
HOLLYWOOD
city
HILLS
VENGA
821
GLEND
BLVD
En
TOURNAMENT PARK
IULHOLLAND
DRIVE
L A FIRE DEPT
PAIRE No.2
PATROL
BE
N
C
Lake
11.567
0
DRIVE
Hollywood
SAN MARINO
Upper Res,
DRIVE
101
Stone
PILCATRE
SOUTH
80
HOLLYWOOD
MONTEREY
Canyon
Res.
CANYON
BOWL
LOS FELIZ
MEMBER
PASADENA
ROSES RD
LOOKOUT HTN
EL
EL 550
a
HOLLY
APROYD SECO
Franklin
COLDWATER
WEST
ALHAMBRA
Cangon
HOLLYWOOD
Rrs
405
BLVD
SANTA
MONTEREY
IVEST L AL RANGE
SUNSET
POPU
PO
HAMBRA
ALMANSOR
DR
HUNT
COLLEGE
BELAIR
MELROSE
COUNTRY CLUB
BEVERLY
BLVD
HILLS
VIN
AONTS
268)
BEVERLY
#
AV
BLVD
VALLEY
3RV
BROADWAY
BEYO
ANGELES
AUDITORY
SAY
LOS ANGELES
BURTON
FAIRFAX
NORMANDIE
ST
1011
LINCOLI
EASTERN
10,
WESTWOO
MANCOCK PARE
VILLAGE
BLVD
WILTON
GARFIELD
CENTURY
WILSHIRE
Littlett
BLVD
VALLEY
GARVEY
CITY
BLVD
BLVD.
8TH
ST.
MONTEREY
VEICHANS
SAN
PARK
BRENTWOOD
CIENEGA
OLYMPIC
EL.380
ORRHANAGE
COUNTRY
BLVQ
PICO
SINEWORK
Garvey Res.
PICO
BARCHD
VENICE
WEST
COURSE
ROSEDALE CEM
BLUD
BROOKLYN
AVE EAST LA
GRANDE
LOS ANGELES
7 TM
MINTER
12380
POMONA
a.vo.
BLVD
AVE
POMONA
BLVD
IIVO
BLVD
SANTA
MONTEBELLO
COURSE
2:
LOS.
BLVD
EAST
YEAR
LOS ANGELE
to
BLVD
320
BLVD
LINCO
BLVD
BLVD
ANGELES
OLYMPIC
72
26 TH'S
UNICA
PACK
CONTEBELLO
AVE
VISTA
EL.93
41ST
ST
r
WESHINGTON
ST
FIELD
VERNON
STUDIO
VERNON
AVE
VENICE
VERNON
AVE
MONTEBELLO
3ATH
ARLINGTON
EL 205
WESTERN
VERMONT
ALAMEDA
LEONS
DISTRICT
ST
DATE
COMMERCE
VE
CEMETERY
FRUITLAND
E
MAYWOOD
LADERS
AVE
SLAUSON
AV
AVE
2
1
4
5-11,14,17
15
18
16
12
36
33
13
38
27
Congressional Districts
39
43
Assembly Bill 16
42
40
OF
MEXICO
41
Z
VALLEJO
4
SAN RAFAEL
M
Go
RICHMOND
14
BERKELEY
CONTRA ONTRA COSTA
OAKLAND
SAN
6
in
FRANCISCO
ALAMEDA
8
SAN LEANDRO
//
PACIFICA
BURLINGAME
S
CISAN MATEO
MATER
REDWOOD
FREMONT
CITY
17
PALO
ALTO
4
I
LOS ALTOS
c.
CLARA
SAN JOSE
Congressional Districts
SARATOGA
Assembly Bill 16
10
4)
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
X
1:62,500
ADMINTS
Rockaway Beach
Dist
Millbrae
BRIDGE
92
WHIPPLE
VALLECITOS
Decoto
VALLE
Linda Mar
Pt.
MATEO
Dist.
Dist
Alvarado*
Sunot
FARK
FRIWY.
SANCHEZ
Dist.
NILES
Scotts Corner
Hillst
an
Niles
/
18
Foster City
STATE
Centerville
Dist.
BLVD
Montara
Fremont
Irvington
r/sh,
THORNTON
MISSION
rost
Mission
Belmont
Newark
San Jose
Dist.
centon
El Granada
AND
Carlos
Redwood City
Warm Springs
Six
Dist.
ALAMEDA
SANTA
CLARA
GAME
Mook Biol
REFUSE
*3
Coyote-
Moolo
Park
Palo Alto
will
34
ATG
Vollege
FELTER
BLACK WIN.
-
Milpitas
DAY
1459
CARIBREAN
SIERRA
ADNEWS
Agnew
Perjoja
abites
Valuey
Hills
Suring
of
vale
Charge Santa Clara
FOOT
COPERNICUS
MILLS
inc.
35
THE
Jose
$45
X4
W:
STEVENS
blik
Graping
Permanente
Estimida
Cupertino
Smith Creek
/
E
PROSPECT 2
Campbell
STEVENS
NEMORAL
CREEK
PARK
loos Min-
2634
CAPITOL
FRONTIER
MATOLA
SARATOGA
13
Percidero
-
POLLARD
BUTAND
STATE
Saratoga
BLOSSOM
Comb
the
YOREST
Monte
Sereno
MILL
C10
HERESA
CASTLE
METCALE
2507
MT.
PLEASANT
Los Gatos
Coyote
1.1
MATER
and
STATES
POREST
TERESA
FREE
BIG
8
BASIN
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 17
REDWOODS
Big
STATE, ,PARK
Basin
ASSEMBLY BILL 16
ROCK
Madrone
Base Map material furnished as a public service by the
Morgan
Bc
California State Automobile Association Copyright Owner.
Hill
/
Brookdales
Reproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of
the copyright owner.
12
Ben
15,
Lomond
UVAS
(1.344
COUNTY
Swanton
-
FOREST OF
Meachan
(CR)
SEE INSET MAP FOR NORTHERN PART OF COUNTY
24
22
27
COUNTY
20
26
33
29
28
30
25
38
NATA
37
&
19
35
21
Firms
23
COUNTY
PRELIMINARY
COUNTY
31
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
0
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
Congressional Districts
34
35
Assembly Bill 16
-
24
32
=
by
NORTHERN PART OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1
25
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SAN
to
LaHabra
BERNARDINO
Flood Cantrol
COUNTY
Basin
Norwalk
orba Linds
Paramount
Fuller
/Buena
Corona
Artesia
Lakewood
LAKE
MATHEWS
1
Anaheim
*
-
Garden
LAND.
34
Grove
Rossmoor
U.S.MAYAL
Long
Midway
Beach
STATION
Santa
PEDRO
BAY
Ana
39
Sunset Beach
32
NATIONAL
Elsinore
LAKE
Huntington
Beach
Costa
-
Mesa
WHY
Newport Beach
Corona
Balbon
del Mar
42
in
FOREST
Base Map meterial furnished as public service by the
Automobile Club Southern Catifornia Copyright Owner.
Reproduction this map is prohibited without consent of
the copyright owner.
Laguna Beach
SAN DIEGO
C.O
South Laguna
ORANGE COUNTY
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 16
San Clemente
42
CAMP
JOSEPH
PENDLETON
(USMC)
Congressional Districts
N
Fallbrox
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
MEMO TO THE PRESS
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
12-30-71
#731
Following are the texts of the Assembly, Senate and Congressional
reapportionment bills vetoed by Governor Reagan:
AB 16 - Waxman
"This bill is defective in achieving equality of
representation in two ways, (1) the failure to achieve substantial
equality of population in every instance, and (2) the denial of effec-
tive equal representation for all voters due to the shapes of a number
of the districts.
Inequality of Population
In at least two districts (5 and 6) there has not been a good faith
effort to achieve equality of population with the other districts in
the state. These two districts were left entirely within the boundaries
of San Francisco and Marin Counties, with the result that each district
has a population of only some 461,000 persons, 3,000 short of the ideal
size of 464,026. (District 5 has 460,838; District 6 has 461,594).
As a result two other Northern California districts are left over-
populated, and under-represented by about the same number of persons.
(District 3 with 467,743, and District 4 with 468,560)
Lack of Effective Representation for Every Voter
The congressional plan has shortcomings in several other areas, all of
which tend to work to the disadvantage of a number of citizens in
achieving effective equality of representation. Underlying the concept
of 'one man - one vote' is the principle that all citizens should have
a voice in their government. That principle is vitiated when districts
are drawn so that the members of a constituency have little in common
or are confused by the vagaries of tortuously constructed lines.
Some of these shortcomings are as follows:
Difficulty of Access to All Parts of the District
Some districts have unnecessary appendages attached that are not
effectively contiguous to the rest of the district. An example is the
36th district in Kings, Kern, and San Luis Obispo counties, which has a
long arm with almost no population in it, and no road from one end to
the other, reaching all the way down the coastline to Goleta and Isla
Vista in Santa Barbara County. The 43rd district includes a portion
of San Diego County on the coastal side of the mountains that separates
these people unnecessarily from the bulk of the population in Riverside
and Imperial counties. The 42nd district has the bulk of its population
in central San Diego County, but includes voters as far up the coast
#731
as Newport Beach. In my view, to the extent possible, every part of a
district should be directly accessible to the rest of the district, to
facilitate ease of communication, to provide access to elected public
representatives and to achieve effective equal representation.
Lack of Geographical Compactness
Several districts are not as reasonably compact as they might be. The
28th district extends in a narrow strip along virtually the entire
western coast of Los Angeles County from Malibu to Palos Verdes. The
36th, 42nd, and 43rd districts already mentioned are other examples.
The 23rd and 34th districts both wind tortuously through Los Angeles
and Orange counties, and the 37th through central Los Angeles, for
obvious partisan purposes unrelated to effective representation. Dis-
tricts should be at least reasonably compact to facilitate ease of com-
munication between voter and representative.
Division of Communities of Interest
There is a random disregard for preservation of communities of interest
in this bill, with many communities arbitrarily divided---sometimes
solely for political purposes. The 17th district in Santa Clara County
includes a narrow corridor dividing downtown San Jose, and picking up
a predominately Mexican-American community on the east side, removed
from the bulk of the population on the west side of Santa Clara and
San Mateo counties. The 35th district arbitrarily takes a portion of
downtown Long Beach out of the 32nd District. The cities of San
Bernardino, Pomona, and Riverside are all split by the 38th district
for partisan advantage. Two adjacent Alameda County districts, the 7th
and 8th, arbitrarily pick up areas of Contra Costa County. Effective
representation should dictate that local political boundaries and com-
munities of interest be kept intact as much as possible to avoid
unnecessarily confusing voters with respect to whom his representative
may be.
The apportionment of California's seats in the House of Representatives
will have an extremely important impact on the nature and quality of
California's representation as a state in the federal system for at
least a decade to come.
The many deficiencies I have outlined show that a far better job of
Congressional reapportionment should have been done. These factors,
taken cumulatively, should leave no doubt in the mind of anyone truly
seeking a fair plan of Congressional apportionment that this legislation
is unacceptable and certainly not in the best interests of the people
of California.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the governor said.
AB 12 NP Waxman
"This bill is defective in at least six major ways.
First, it appears that there are several districts that deviate sub-
stantially from equality of population. This problem is exacerbated by
the way in which census unit boundaries have been ignored in construct-
ing some districts. Instead of census units, precincts have been used
in several cases as building blocks. It is well established, of course,
that districts must be created on the basis of population, not on the
-2-
#731
basis of the number of registered voters in precinct. The mixture of
the use of precinct lines, and census boundaries, is inappropriate for
the purposes of reapportionment and, in addition, makes it impossible
to perform an efficient verification of population totals.
Another associated flaw is the fact that there is at least one instance
in the bill in which the same voters are included in more than one
district.
A second major flaw is the failure to give due attention to compactness
as a standard for establishing the new districts. Compactness is one
of the chief requirements of a rational reapportionment policy, for
compact districts create constituencies that are more easily and
effectively represented, that allow the people more direct access to
their assemblymen, and that lighten the task of conducting elections.
The sole reason for the failure to establish compact districts in this
bill appears to have been the attempt of the majority party to obtain
partisan advantage. Examples of this flaw in the bill include the 10th
Assembly District which stretches from Concord to Stockton, south
150 miles to the southernmost tip of Santa Clara County, and thence
northward into the City of San Jose, and the 2nd, the 31st, the 16th,
the 29th, 65th, and the 69th Assembly Districts. I strongly believe
that in a rational plan the new districts should be at least as compact
as those in the present law, and that every effort should be made to
improve on existing standards of compactness.
A third flaw is the failure to establish districts that reflect the
ways in which the people of the state actually interact and communicate.
Districts should be established in such a way as to allow the people to
communicate easily with their representatives and to allow representa-
tives to travel without difficulty from one part of the district to
another. In this bill, however, districts are created that are cut by
mountain ranges and other natural obstacles and that join very different
areas by narrow corridors of unpopulated territory. In some districts
there are even no reasonable routes of highway travel between one part
of the district and another. Again, there is no rational purpose for
the creation of such districts, but simply an effort to make partisan
gains. Only political motivation explains the lines of the 4th and 29th
districts. The 4th Assembly District, traditionally a northern central
valley district, is needlessly extended westward over the coastal
mountains to include a portion of the City of Santa Rosa, whose
-3-
#731
residents have negligible commonality with the central valley citizens
who would undoubtedly dominate the selection of this district's repre-
sentative. In the proposed 29th district, I fail to see even the most
remote relationship between the interests of rural San Luis Obispo
County and southeastern Ventura County. What access to his representa-
tive would a resident of either end of this district have, in the event
the representative is elected from the opposite end, hundreds of miles
away? In addition, the 31st district, which would stretch from Santa
Cruz to the High Sierra, is totally indefensible, and an insult to the
very concept of participatory representation. Its effect upon its
proposed constituents would be to deny numerous communities any effec-
tive access to their representative, no matter how able he might be.
I believe that a rational redistricting plan would provide for districts
that avoid these problems and give both the people and their represent-
atives unrestricted opportunities for communication and access.
A fourth flaw in the bill is the blatant failure to pay due respect to
the needs and interests of the different communities and political
divisions in the state. The districts provided for in this bill cut
across county and city lines, fragment the established political
divisions of the state, and violate the identity of innumerable
communities. Again, the sole purpose seems to have been to achieve
partisan gains. Thus, Stockton is divided among four districts and
Santa Clara County is given similarly irrational treatment. The
southern boundary of the 2nd Assembly District divides virtually every
community of any size, throwing some citizens of each community into a
predominantly rural, north coast district, and others of the same com-
munities into the 7th District, whose interests are distinctly of a
metropolitan Bay Area nature. A rational apportionment of assembly
districts requires an effort to preserve the political identities of
the cities and other political divisions of the state and to establish
districts that add to rather than diminish that sense of community
which is one of the prime bases of our system of representative
government.
A fifth flaw in the bill is the apparent use of minority group popula-
tion data to construct districts that will remain safe for white incum-
bent Democrats through the decade of the 1970s. Reapportionment should
be conducted with an eye blind to color and race. But, in many areas,
this bill reflects what can only be a deliberate effort to establish
districts that will not permit the election of minority representatives.
This is the only explanation of the fragmentation of the Mexican-American
communities in Los Angeles and of lines drawn for the 45th, 51st and
65th Assembly Districts.
The collapse and reappearance of the 57th District merits special
attention. First, there is clearly no population pressure justification
for this change, inasmuch as the district reappears just a few miles
away from its current location. Second, once the decision is made to
create a new, non-incumbent district in Los Angeles, to place it in such
a location as to ensure the election of an Anglo at a time when respons-
ible, yet long-under-represented minorities are struggling to find ways
to work within our political system, is astounding and completely
indefensible. I am sure the great majority of Californians of all
races will agree.
Apportionment cannot be biased by an effort to keep incumbents of one
race in power, and the new districts should be established in such a
way that all the people of California are fairly and equally represented.
A sixth flaw in the bill is the failure to create districts that reflect
the shifts in population that have occurred in the state since the 1960
census. The data that was made available many months ago by the Bureau
of the Census reveals very clearly that some counties have dramatically
increased in population. In several cases, these counties deserve
additional new seats and the counties that lost in relative population
should lose seats. In this bill, however, deliberate efforts appear to
have been made to resist the impact of these shifts in population.
Again, the motive appears to be simply that of partisan advantage.
Obvious examples of this flaw in the bill include Alameda County.
Indeed, the manner in which this bill proposes to draw Assembly districts
in Alameda County is responsible for many of the principal failures of
this legislation throughout the state. Assembly districts 14, 15, 16
-4-
#731
and 17, as now composed, contain insufficient population for three
districts under the court's requirement of equality. The way in which
these districts were drawn clearly necessitated many of the misshapen
districts and divided communities throughout the balance of the state.
Thus, the County of Contra Costa, with a population entitlement of more
than two full Assembly Districts, is fragmented amongst four districts,
with total disregard for longstanding economic, social, and regional
and local governmental communities---all in a clear effort to preserve
the incumbents in four deficient Alameda districts. Similarly, the
County of San Joaquin, and specifically the City of Stockton, are
divided among four districts, when the county's population entitles it
to 1.16 Assembly districts. It is clear that, at a minimum, the rep-
resentatives elected from both the 9th and 10th districts could never
be expected to reside in or properly represent the citizens and legit-
imate interests of San Joaquin County.
Perhaps no one of these flaws alone would decisively debilitate this
plan, but taken together they point to an effort to subvert the repre-
sentative process for partisan advantage. Nowhere does this bill more
richly deserve the label of blatant, partisan gerrymander than in the
City and County of Fresno. The tortuous changes, inserted at the last
minute before passage, of the lines of the 32nd and 33rd districts may
or may not enhance the prospects of the election of a Mexican-American
from the 32nd district, though the bulk of evidence suggests such a
contention is a cruel hoax. Clearly, however, there was no motivation
save sheer heavy-handed partisan gain behind the decision to include the
incumbents from the two districts within the proposed new boundaries of
the 33rd district.
Other flaws in the bill could be cited, but the evidence is overwhelming
that a good faith effort has been lacking to develop a plan for Assembly
districting that is rational and fair. This bill serves only a narrow
partisan purpose. As was publicly admitted, it is a plan to maintain
and strengthen a Democratic majority in the Assembly. That majority
won power in 1970 with barely 50 percent of the two party vote, but
now seeks to establish districts so heavily biased in favor of Democratic
candidates that it is unlikely that Republicans could win more than 31
or 32 districts in the 1972 elections, even if Republican candidates
again secured 49 or 50 percent of the two-party vote. The whole
nature of the Democratic process depends on effective competition be-
tween the candidates of different parties, but this bill would seek to
eliminate competition from all but a handful of seats now held by
Republican incumbents. In effect, as a result of the efforts to meet
the single goal of partisan gain, all the standards that should go into
the elaboration of a rational state policy on Assembly reapportionment
have been jettisoned.
I cast this veto with the deepest disappointment. I had thought that
the lengthy legislative deliberations of the past year would have pro-
duced an Assembly apportionment that was fair and equitable. However,
I have been presented with a bill which violates every major standard
that should inform a rational state policy on reapportionment and
which, in a very real sense, jeopardizes the whole future of repre-
sentative government in this state.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the governor said.
SB 2 - Dymally
"The reapportionment of our state Senate districts,
which this bill would mandate, is replete with
misshapen and oddly drawn lines which not only stretch the imagination,
but which in many cases, stretch beyond the point of reason.
For example, the 15th District follows the California-Nevada border on
the East from Riverside County northward to above Bridgeport and stretches
across a narrow corridor of the San Joaquin Valley westward to Monterey
on the North and Arroyo Grande on the South. The ludicrousness of the
district's boundaries totally ignores the principle of compactness---
which should be fundamental to the drawing of boundaries around any
voting district. The virtually non-contiguous parts of the district
make effective communication and access within the district unlikely
and effective representation unnecessarily difficult.
-5-
#731
Another flaw in the bill is that the San Mateo portion of the 10th
District is only technically connected to the San Francisco and Marin
portions of the district across the waters of San Francisco Bay where
the county boundaries meet. The district was composed by hopping from
ship to ship along the eastern half of San Francisco in order to gain
access into San Mateo County. Four of these ships had no population
when the census was taken and the ships could move to another location
at any time. The fact that this ridiculous approach was used to justify
gerrymandering of the district once again disregards the principle of
compactness.
Another area of deep concern is Alameda County where districts 8 and 11
constitute the only multi-member districts in the state. This means
that voters in Alameda County would be in a single district represented
by two Senators with twice the population of an ordinary district.
Regrettably, it will have the effect of depriving racial minorities in
the district of the full weight of their voting strength, due to com-
bining the districts and making them twice as large as they otherwise
would be.
Finally, the problem of artifically splintering communities of interest
by dividing representation of cities and counties among Senate districts
is of grave concern, not only to me, but also to citizens and local
officials of many jurisdictions around the state. The problem is
especially acute in Los Angeles where 40 incorporated cities have been
split. For example, the City of Encino, with a population of 41, 579,
would be represented by four Senatorial districts (the 19th, the 22nd,
the 23rd, and the 25th). Orange County would be split into six sena-
torial districts (the 26th, the 34th, the 35th, the 36th, the 37th,
and the 38th). I realize, of course, that under the 'one man-one vote'
doctrine, it is inevitable that some cities and counties will be
divided. However, if local government is to survive, it is imperative
that such divisions be kept to a minimum.
This bill fails miserably in this regard, and in sum, falls far short
of those standards of fair and effective representation the people of
California have a right to expect from a reapportionment measure of
this consequence and magnitude.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned," the governor said.
# # #
-6-
PB
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
MEMO TO THE PRESS
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
12-30-71
Governor Reagan will attend a Rose Bowl
Kick-Off Luncheon at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium,
300 East Green Street, Pasadena at noon Friday,
December 31 and attend the Rose Bowl Game on
Saturday, January 1.
# # #
PB
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
12-30-71
#732
Governor Ronald Reagan announced today the following bills have
been vetoed:
AB 578 - Ryan
Increases the special registration fee for
snowmobiles by one dollar, and establishes noise
limits for snowmobiles.
REASON FOR VETO:
"I already have signed legislation during this
session which addresses itself to problems relating
to the operation of off-road vehicles, including
snowmobiles.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,'
the governor said.
AB 1229 - Waxman
Requires that an absentee ballot be sent with the
ballot pamphlet. The bill changes the deadline for
the receipt of absentee ballots by the clerk from
5:00 p.m. on the day before the day of election
to the time for the closing of the polls on election
day. Permits absentee ballots to be counted if
received by the precinct board of the absent voter's
regular polling place prior to the close of the polls
REASON FOR VETO:
"Rxisting law does not preclude local government from
issluding applications for absentee ballots in
sample ballots. In fact, many of California's larger
counties (including San Francisco, San Diego,
Alameda, Orange and Los Angeles) now include this
type of information with sample ballots. I can find
no justification to mandate on local government the
additional burden of including this material in over
8 million sample ballots, when absentee voters
consist of less than 5 percent of the total votes
cast.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,'
the governor said.
AB 1474 Ralph
Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to
select six school districts with an average daily
attendance of 5,000 or more for a pilot project to
provide for the establishment and operation of one
school-community council for one school within each
district. The bill authorizes the governing boards
of school districts so selected to establish
additional school-community councils for other
schools in the district.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The need for meaningful parent participation in the
educational process is not at issue. However, this
bill imposes an organizational structure on school
districts without taking into consideration the
wishes of parents or local school officials. For
the state to interfere in local school affairs in
this way would be inappropriate and contrary to this
administration's policy of local control of schools.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2050 - Ralph
Provides that the Superintendent of Public Instruction
shall establish standards for qualification of
children's centers as instruction laboratories for
those children receiving day care services, and
on-the-job training facilities for community college
students, subject to approval by the State College
Trustees and the Board of Governors of the California
Community Colleges.
- 1 -
#732
AB 2050 - Ralph (Cont'd.)
REASON FOR VETO:
"Approval of this measure would re-establish
laboratory classrooms on these college campuses,
even though the legislature chose to remove from
last year's budget funding for similar undertakings
at four state colleges.
"These instructional laboratories are, and should be,
primarily research-oriented. I believe research is
properly a function of the University of California,
The legislative analyst has indicated that the type
and amount of research which has resulted from
laboratory schools operated by the University has
greatly exceeded that of parallel programs previously
run by the state colleges.
"In view of the University's accomplishments in this
field, and in line with the policy of this
administration that state-supported educational
research functions should be reserved to the
University, I do not believe it would be appropriate
for the state to mandate new functions of this type
on our already hard-pressed local school districts.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
3089
AB
2089 - Chappie
Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to
apportion the high school foundation program amount
of $488 per average daily attendance for all
opportunity schools and classes and all continuation
schools and classes maintained by the county
superintendent of schools.
REASON FOR VETO:
"This measure would proliferate the direct services
being performed by county superintendents of schools.
In 1971, both the Governor's Commission on Education
Reform and the legislative analyst recommended that
direct services of county superintendents such as
responsibility for classroom teaching be reduced or
eliminated and that the county superintendent of
education's role be re-oriented toward such functions
as centralized services, instructional guidance and
curricula development. In this regard, I am in full
agreement with the conclusions of the Commission on
Education Reform and the legislative analyst.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2554 - Lewis
Makes several clarifying amendments
to provisions relating to child care
education. The bill specifically requires the State
Department of Social Welfare to adopt regulations
which maximize federal financial participation. It
prescribes that services are to be provided to persons
classed as former and potential recipients under a
definition which includes, but is not limited to, all
groups enumerated in federal regulations. The bill
also requires that all child care programs involving
the expenditure of federal funds, including those
authorized by the Welfare Reform Act of 1971, to be
carried out under terms specified in the Social
Welfare/Education contract.
REASON FOR VETO:
"The bill places the state in a position of having to
mandate child care welfare services for large numbers
of people who are not now welfare recipients and could
not qualify to receive welfare grants. The
unrestricted definition would constitute a blank
check whereby the federal government could pressure
the state into allocating unlimited resources in
order to meet this commitment.
- 2 -
#732
AB 2554 - Lewis (Cont'd
REASON FOR VETO (Cont 'd.)
"The Welfare Reform Act of 1971 provided funds for
child care services and to that extent mandated child
care services to a defined group of former and
potential welfare recipients. The approach
authorized by the Welfare Reform Act provides the
flexibility needed to determine how child care
services can best be provided to meet local needs.
This approach should be adequately tested before
committing taxpayers to fund the unlimited kind of
services this bill would force on them.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
AB 2578 - Waxman
Establishes the Secretary of State as the Chief
Elections Officer and requires that he insure the
laws pertaining to elections are uniformly and
adequately observed. He is also given the power
to prescribe the format and content of reports from
local election officials as he deems advisable.
The bill also repeals certain mandatory deadlines
for county clerks to file voter registration
information and allows the Secretary of State to
establish new deadlines. He will also control
dissemination of this information.
REASON FOR VETO:
"Existing law already provides the Secretary of State
with a method of obtaining statistical information
on voter registration and election results. Further,
to repeal mandatory deadlines for county clerks to
file voter registration information and to permit
reporting dates to be changed on an election-by-
election basis can only result in needless confusion
and unnecessary delays in reporting by local county
clerks.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
SB 3 - Alquist
Provides that candidates on the ballot will be those
found by Secretary of State to be recognized
candidates throughout the nation or California for
office of President of United States if they have
properly formed a delegation no later than the 74th
day before the primary. The bill permits any such
candidate to withdraw by filing no later than the
74th day before the primary an affidavit that he is
not candidate.
REASON FOR VETO:
"This bill delegates to one elected official, the
Secretary of State, the authority and responsibility
for determining who is a generally recognized
candidate for his party's nomination for the
presidency, at least for purposes of gaining a place
on the ballot. I believe that this determination
should be made by the voters of each party, as it is
now, through the requirement that supporters of each
candidate gather a reasonable number of signatures
of registered voters.
"If a candidate is, indeed, generally recognized as to:
serious presidential contender, his supporters should have no difficulty
in gathering sufficient signatures to place his name on the California
ballot. If, on the other hand, they are unable to gather sufficient
signatures, that, in itself, would indicate a lack or broad-based appeal.
California's election system already provides for direct citizen involve-
ment. The present system in California in no way handicaps serious
candidates who are seeking presidential office and, contrary to what its
advocates contend, this measure does not change existing law with respect
to requiring a candidate to form a delegation.
"Accordingly. I am returning the bill unsigned,' the governor said.
- 3 -
#732
SB 1256 - Beilenson
Prohibits the Department of Public Works from
granting or leasing to the City of Los Angeles, any
interest in the right-of-way of, including the use
of areas above or below, Route 405 proposed by the
Los Angeles Department of Airports, without the
approval of the legislature.
REASON FOR VETO:
"As the result of 1970 legislation, the state made
available for lease portions of state rights-of-way
to local agencies for mass transit. That portion of
the 1970 legislation which specifically cited Route
405 as one route to be studied for mass transit
vehicles usage would be negated by SB 1256.
"As evidenced by the recent signing of Senate Bill
325, this administration is dedicated to the concept
of encouraging the development of balanced
transportation systems through decisions made at
the local level. The enactment of SB 1256 would
seriously curtail Los Angeles' efforts to improve
the critical problem of access to the Los Angeles
International Airport, and would interpose an
additional level of governmental decision making on
the usage of the right-of-way for this route.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
SB 1391 - Way
Authorizes the committing court to suspend the
commitment of a person to the Director of Corrections
for placement in the California Rehabilitation
Center and place such person on probation under the
county probation department when the court concludes
such person is a fit subject for such suspension.
The bill establishes a formula to determine state
savings when such commitment is suspended and require
the state to reimburse counties at a rate of $4,000
for each numerical reduction in its annual commitment
rate to be used by the counties for drug treatment
and control programs. The bill also provides for a
termination date of December 31, 1975.
REASON FOR VETO.
"Many questions have been raised regarding the
probation subsidy program. Since this new concept
has been in effect now for several years, it deserves
a serious evaluation. Accordingly, several studies
are presently under way to determine its efficacy.
It would be premature, particularly in view of the
cost inherent in this measure, to create a new
subsidy program before the results of the studies
are known. The basic concepts contained in this
measure could conceivably become part of a
comprehensive drug abuse treatment program if the
studies were to show that an expansion of probation
subsidy would be warranted.
"Furthermore, the estimated additional state cost of
$1.2 to $1.9 million per year is prohibitive at this
time, This bill contemplates using savings at the
state level resulting from reductions in commitments
to the California Rehabilitation Center. Based on
1971-72 budget figures, the resulting savings per
inmate are not sufficient to meet the $4,000 subsidy
rate.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned, "
the governor said.
- 4 -
#732
SB 1400 - Way
Would provide a procedure whereby the Madera County
territory of the State Center Community College
District could transfer to another community college
district.
REASON FOR VETO:
"Recently approved legislation (Chapter 1100)
provides for an orderly process to transfer a portion
of a community college district to another district.
Furthermore, the Education Code already provides
for establishing new community college districts
or for the changing of district boundaries.
"This measure, if approved, would circumvent
existing law, by permitting an exception to it,
while bypassing the local community college board
of trustees, the county committee on school district
organization, and the Board of Governors of the
California Community Colleges.
"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,"
the governor said.
#######
EJG
- 5 -
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
MEMO TO THE PRESS
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
12-30-71
#733
GOVERNOR'S SCHEDULE
January 3, 1971
through
January 9, 1971
Monday, January 3
Office Appointments
Overnight - Sacramento
Tuesday, January 4
Office Appointments
Afternoon
Depart for Los Angeles
Overnight - Los Angeles
Wednesday, January 5
1:00 P.M.
KCET Studios, 1313 North Vine Street - Taping
of program with William F. Buckley
Afternoon
Depart for Sacramento
Overnight - Sacramento
Thursday, January 6
11:00 a.m.
State of the State Message, Assembly Chambers
Overnight - Sacramento
Friday, January 7
Office Appointments
Overnight - Los Angeles
Saturday, January 8
No Appointments Scheduled
Overnight - Los Angeles
Sunday, January 9
No Appointments Scheduled
Overnight - Sacramento
# # #
PB
Page data
- Page
- 1
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- 9cfa28e047903a5f
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 118564318
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "118564318",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564318",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Press Releases - 12/22/1971-12/31/1971",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564318",
"identifierLocal": "840",
"collections": [
"Ronald Reagan's Governor's Papers of the Press Unit",
"Press Releases"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P12-010-2017.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P12-010-2017.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P12-010-2017.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "118564318",
"label": "Press Releases - 12/22/1971-12/31/1971",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564318"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "118564318",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564318",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Press Releases - 12/22/1971-12/31/1971",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564318",
"identifierLocal": "840",
"collections": [
"Ronald Reagan's Governor's Papers of the Press Unit",
"Press Releases"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P12-010-2017.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P12-010-2017.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P12-010-2017.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564318",
"naId": 118564318,
"coverageEndDate": {
"logicalDate": "1975-12-31",
"year": 1975
},
"coverageStartDate": {
"logicalDate": "1967-01-01",
"year": 1967
},
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 1,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P12-010-2017.pdf",
"mediaId": "9cfa28e047903a5f",
"ocrText": "Ronald Reagan Presidential Library\nDigital Library Collections\nThis is a PDF of a folder from our textual\ncollections.\nCollection: Reagan, Ronald: Gubernatorial Papers,\n1966-74: Press Unit\nFolder Title: Press Releases -\n12/22/1971-12/31/1971\nBox: P12\nTo see more digitized collections visit:\nhttps://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library\nTo see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:\nhttps://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection\nContact a reference archivist at: [email protected]\nCitation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing\nNational Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE:\nImmediate\nSacramento, Californi\nContact:\nPaul Bec\n445-4571\n12-22-71\n#716\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today announced the following\nbill has been signed:\nAB 2015 - McAlister Provides for an experimental project in Santa Clara\n(Chapter 1810)\nCounty (until December 31, 1974) in which the County\nSuperintendent of Schools, with the approval of the\nCounty Board of Education and the Board of\nSupervisors, could establish and maintain classes\nfor prisoners in county jails.\nThe governor also announced the veto of the following bills:\nAB 220 - Brown\nEstablishes the Division of Marine Traffic Control in\nthe Department of Navigation and Ocean Development.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"AB 220 duplicates present efforts of the U. S. Coast\nGuard toward the development of a navigational safety\nsystem for California's waters. To mandate State\nintervention in this area would confuse and retard\nrather than accelerate the development of an\noperational and practical system.\n\"Additionally, the bill does not identify the large\namount of capital expenditures that would be\nrequired for radar positioning and tracking systems.\n\"I have directed the Department of Navigation and\nOcean Development to work closely with the Coast\nGuard to develop an appropriate navigational\nsafety system, which can be developed and implemented\nfor all of California's waters at the earliest\npossible date.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the\ngovernor said.\nAB 681 - McCarthy\nWould require the Division of Industrial Safety of\nthe Department of Industrial Relations to investigate\nall complaints on unsafe working conditions within\nthree working days, regardless of the severity or\nlocation of the hazard involved.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"There is no demonstrated need for this legislation\nsince the Division of Industrial Relations has always\nplaced high priority in the handling of complaints.\nThe three-day limit proposed by AB 681 is an\nunnecessary restriction on the Division, limiting its\nability to apply its resources and skills at the\nplaces of greatest need. A safety engineer, for\nexample, might be forced to travel many miles to\ninvestigate a complaint involving nuisance dust\ninstead of responding immediately to a more serious\nhazard, like an unshored trench, at another location.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the\ngovernor said.\nAB 1419 - Warren\nWould establish the position of State Public Defender t\nto be appointed by the Judicial Council.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I recently vetoed SB 24 which would have provided for\nthe appointment of a State Public Defender by the\nGovernor.\n-1-\n#716\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"AB 1419 is unacceptable for a number of reasons. It\nAB 1419 - Warren\nis contrary to progressive judicial administration\n(Continued)\nbecause it removes from the attorney who represents\nthe indigent criminal defendant at trial the\nresponsibility for his post-trial representation as\nwell. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger has expressed\nhis disapproval of this practice in his recent Report\non the State of the Judiciary: \" (A) large factor in\nthe excessive cost and excessive delay in criminal\nappeals is the tendency to appoint a new lawyer on\nappeal\nRequiring the trial lawyer to conduct the\nappeal\nwill\nsave both time and money.\" (57 American\nBar Association Journal 855,858).\n\"I, too, am convinced that representation of the\nindigent defendants is best performed by locally\nappointed counsel, preferably the one who represented\nhim at trial. The bench and the Bar have a\nprofessional responsibility, indeed obligation, to\nrepresent the indigent criminal defendant at the\nappellate level. Private attorneys, acting under\ncourt appointment, are now able to represent adequate]\nappellants in these cases. To spawn yet another\nexpensive governmental agency such as an office of\nState Public Defender to handle these matters, when\nthey can and should be handled by the bench and bar,\nwould merely add an additional level of bureaucracy\nwhich I believe is neither necessary nor appropriate.\n\"Although it is true that there is a backlog of\ncases before the courts, there is no compelling\nevidence to support the allegation that a public\ndefender would speed up the judicial process. To\nthe contrary, there is a very high probability that\nmore cases built on new strained theories would be\nappealed as a new office holder sought to justify his\nexistence and performance.\n\"It is time that the bench and the bar face the issues\nsquarely and look to themselves for the answers which\nthis bill purportedly seeks. SB 24 is clearly not\nthe answer.\n\"As I have said before, I am vigorously opposed to\nthe concept of establishing an office of State Public\nDefender and I will continue to strongly oppose\nthe enactment of such legislation. At the same\ntime, I want to emphasize that I favor judicial\nreform and have supported Chief Justice Donald Wright\nin establishing the Select Committee on Trial Court\nDelay.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the\ngovernor said.\nAB 1661 - Brathwaite Would require that any psychiatrist or physician\nemployed by a prisoner or his attorney be\npermitted to visit the prisoner.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I fully agree that the constitutional right of an\naccused to prepare his defense must be protected.\nA part of this protection should be access to\nqualified medical practitioners.\n\"However, AB 1661 does not require that such persons\nbe licensed by the state to insure their qualification.\nAs written, it would permit unlimited access to any\nprisoner after trial as well as before trial.\nAccordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the\ngovernor said.\n-2-\n#716\nAB 2346 - Cullen\nWould establish a formula for determining, under the\nMedi-Cal program, reasonable costs of skilled nursing\nhome services and intermediate care facility services.\nThe formula is based primarily on using the mean\naverage of costs experienced within specified size\ngroupings and several other unacceptable factors.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The use of averages in rate computation tends to\nskew the rate upward and discourages efficiency and\ncost effectiveness. Application of the other\nfactors, such as the return on equity and the use\nof Franchise Tax Board criteria, unrealistically\nserves to increase General Fund expenditures for\nnursing home care. Conservatively, such an increase\nis estimated to be between $10 million and $20 million\ndollars per year.\n\"Further, the bill's provision to have the Director\nof Health Care Services consult with individuals\nor organizations operating nursing homes in the\nadministration of the program and the funding of\nchanges in standards and requirements of the program\nduplicate the work of the California Health Care\nCommission created by AB 949 (Chapter 577, Stautes of\n1971).\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the\ngovernor said.\nAB 3006 - Vasconcellos\nRepeals the present law governing political\nactivities of local government employees. The\nbill limits, with certain exceptions, the restrictions\non political activities of such employees.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"AB 3006 would make possible a multitude of\ndiffering regulations governing the political\nactivities of local public employees throughout the\nstate. The bill provides that local governing\nbodies can establish rules and regulations limited\nto three areas of political activity, but does not\nprovide that such rules and regulations be uniform in\ntheir statewide application.\n\"If the public interest is to be served by clarifying\nthe political activities in which public employees\nmay be involved, then uniformity is essential.\nThis bill would result in confusion even within the\nsame community where different local jurisdictions\nare present.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned, \" the\ngovernor said.\nSB 565 - Stiern\nWould increase the in lien tax on automobiles by an\naverage of 34 percent.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"This is an additional tax on property. For the State\nto impose yet another burden on our already beleagured\nproperty taxpayers--especially at a time when home-\nowners taxes at the local level continue to rise to\nnew heights--not only would ignore their plight, but\nalso would fly in the face of their earnest and\njustifiable desire for real and lasting property tax\nrelief.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the\ngovernor said.\n-3-\nAB 1181 - Murphy\nThis bill would create a Joi\nCommittee on\n( rections Administration and the Office of\nOmbudsman for Corrections.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The Department, in keeping with the principles of\ngood administration, already has an effective\nprocedure for handling grievances. An ombudsman\noutside the system with no operational responsibility\nwould be divisive, and would only increase the\nproblems of rehabilitation and control. At best,\nthis would be an expensive (at least $400, 000 per\nyear) duplication of existing services for which no\nneed has been demonstrated.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 1403 - Crown\nWould require the Department of Health Care Services\nto publish an annual compilation of certain\ninformation relating to frequently prescribed\nmultiple-source drugs. It would require that the\nlisting be distributed to physicians, dentists,\npharmacists, consumer groups, and others.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The information required by AB 1403 is currently\npublished and available from a variety of sources,\nincluding government agencies.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 1788 - Knox\nWould create the California Archaeological Survey\nwithin the Department of Conservation and the\nCalifornia Archaeological Board within the Survey.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The creation of this new Survey is unnecessary to\nmeet the objectives of this measure. Senate Bill\n215 (Chapter 827) requires a task force study of\nthe state's archaeological efforts, to be completed\nby December 31, 1972. Since the study has been\nrequested by the legislature, it would seem advisable\nto await the results of it before taking further\naction.\n\"In addition, AB 1788 contains a number of technical\nflaws, as well as serious questions regarding the\nstaffing and funding provisions contained in the bill\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2087 - Burton\nWould require California to convert food stamp\nbonuses into cash benefits for recipients of Old Age\nSecurity, Aid to the Blind, and Aid to the Totally\nDisabled, if and when federal law is changed to\nprohibit welfare recipients from purchasing food\nstamps.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The bill is predicated on an anticipated change in\nthe federal law. No such change appears likely prior\nto mid-1973, if at all.\n\"In view of the uncertainty presently surrounding\nthis subject, and the inflexible position which this\nbill would impose upon the state, I do not feel that\nAB 2087 is appropriate.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\n-4-\n#716\nAB 300 - Cory\nWould permit those qualifying for the homeowners'\nexemption but filing late without showing\nreasonable cause for doing so---to receive 80\npercent of the exemption by filing by December 10\nof the year of a claim.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I already have approved SB 1006 (Chapter 1583)\nwhich permits boards of supervisors to grant 80\npercent of the homeowners' exemption to late\nclaimants who can show reasonable cause for failure\nto file in a timely manner. I find no justification\nto grant this exemption to those who fail to file\nunder the provisions of existing law without showing\nreasonable cause for the late filing, as proposed by\nthis measure. In addition, legislation enacted in\n1970 provided for the extension of the filing date\nin two different types of situations. A maximum\n6-month extension was allowed when a timely claim\nwas filed, but was defective because it lacked all\nrequired information or the signature of the claimant\nand a 15-day extension was allowed for those\nindividuals who filed a veterans' exemption which\nwas disallowed.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 732 - Brathwaite\nWould provide that no public institution of higher\neducation may refuse admission to graduate programs\nsolely on the basis of sex. The bill would also\nrequire governing boards of each segment of public\nhigher education to report annually to the legislatur\non the number and qualifications of male and female\napplicants and enrollees in each graduate program.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I have no objections to the prohibition contained\nin AB 732 relating to the refusal to admit students\nto graduate programs solely on the basis of sex.\nHowever, the requirement that public colleges and\nuniversities report the qualifications of applicants\nand enrollees in each graduate program is burdensome\nand unnecessary.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 794 - Ralph\nWould authorize the chief of the Division of Fair\nEmployment Practices or an attorney of the State Fair\nEmployment Practice Commission to file a verified\ncomplaint, containing specified information concerning\nunlawful employment practices, and would authorize an\nemployer whose employees refuse, or threaten to refuse\nto cooperate with fair employment practice provisions\nto file a verified complaint seeking assistance by\nconciliation or other remedial action.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I find no compelling need to approve this measure.\nExisting law already authorizes any person, including\nemployers, to file a complaint with the Commission.\nAlso the Commission, its Counsel, or Division Chief\ncan file complaints through the Attorney General's\noffice.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill ansigned,\" \"\nthe governor said.\n-5-\nAB 30 - Warren\nWould extend the jurisdiction of the Industrial\nWelfare Commission for the purpose of setting a\nminimum wage for men.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The author has informed me that as a practical\nmatter the number of employees affected would be\nsmall, as most employees are covered by federal\nminimum wage provisions and those not covered by\nfederal law are generally covered by equal pay\nstatutes. In view of the bill's very limited\napplication, I question the merit of reopening wage\norders, which would result in an additional cost to\nthe state of approximately $150,000.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 55 - Greene, B.\nProvides that a state scholarship award winner may\nuse the scholarship at specified postsecondary\ninstitutions in California in addition to those\ninstitutions which offer two-year community college\nor four-year college courses with accreditation by\nthe Western Association of Schools and Colleges.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I agree that a need exists to provide financial\nassistance for technical and vocational students.\nHowever, permitting persons who win a \"state\nscholarship\" to use his scholarship in postsecondary\ninstitutions would raise a false promise of aid to\nvocational students which, for all practical purposes\ncannot be realized under the present academic\nselection standards. Under present selection\nstandards for the State Scholarship Program, only\n3 percent of high school graduates qualify for state\nscholarships. The winners normally have a 3.5 grade\npoint average and are academically qualified for\nfour-year institutions of higher education.\nTherefore, it is extremely unlikely that such winners\nwould use their awards in other than two and four-\nyear academic institutions.\n\"I have directed my staff to develop an approach\nwhich will provide assistance to high school graduate\nwho desire occupational, technical, or vocational\neducation.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 232 - Dunlap\nWould direct the Coordinating Council for Higher\nEducation, in cooperation with the Trustees of the\nCalifornia State Colleges, to study the feasibility\nand desirability of transferring the California\nMaritime Academy to the State College System. The\nmeasure would appropriate $65,000 to the Coordinating\nCouncil for this purpose.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"This bill is unnecessary. In vetoing AB 705, I\nestablished a task force to study a number of\nalternatives relating to the future of the California\nMaritime Academy. The task force effort is now under\nway. Its representation is broadly based and include\nthe director of the Coordinating Council for Higher\nEducation. The scope of the task force effort is not\nlimited to the single alternative which this bill\nseeks.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\n-6-\n#716\nAB 2923 - Chacon\nWould increase the minimum annual salary for\nteachers.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"California teachers are among the highest paid in\nthe country. The average California teacher's\nsalary in 1970-71 was $11,216 for ten months' work.\n\"This measure would mandate increased costs on local\nschool districts, without taking into consideration\nthe districts' ability to pay, or local cost of\nliving conditions, which vary throughout the state.\n\"In addition, this measure could have the effect of\ncausing an upward adjustment of teachers' salaries\nstatewide, regardless of whether or not a district\nis already paying above the proposed minimum.\nAccordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the\ngovernor said.\nSB 835 - Alquist\nWould appropriate $3,350,000 to augment the Budget\nAct of 1971 for the purposes of community college\nextended opportunity programs.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"This augmentation is unnecessary because additional\nfederal funds, which were anticipated in my original\n1971-72 budget, have been made available for\ncommunity college extended opportunity programs in\nthe amount of approximately $3 million. In addition,\n$1.2 million of federal national defense student loar\nmoney has been made available for student loans by\nthe community colleges.\n\"Furthermore, this measure attempts to augment a\nnonexistent item in the Budget Act of 1971.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nSB 998 - Petris\nAuthorizes an increase in the existing permissive\nschool override tax to pay deficits incurred in any\nprior year for school meals for needy children.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"As I have said before, I strongly support local\ndecision making and local control of public education\nin California. The constant pressure for additional\npermissive school tax overrides or the extension of\nsuch overrides erodes this control by taking from the\nvoters the right to participate directly in the\ndetermination of spending priorities at the local\nlevel.\n\"In addition, if this measure were approved it would\npermit school districts to ignore the principles of\ngood management by disregarding budget ceilings.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said,\nSB 1196 - Zenovich\nWould require, rather than authorize, school district\nto provide specified programs for educationally\nhandicapped minors who reside within the district.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"Existing law permits school districts and county\nsuperintendents of schools to operate classes for\neducationally handicapped minors. Parents and\nguardians of educationally handicapped minors may\nalso receive tuition payments for educating such\nminors in public or private nonsectarian schools when\nno special educational facilities and services are\navailable through local and state programs. A\ncomprehensive review of the effectiveness of programs\nalready being operated by the various school district\nshould first be undertaken before mandating the\nobligations this bill would impose on all local schoo\ndistricts.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the\ngovernor said.\n- 7 -\nAB 275 - Burton\nWo\nd establish a state progr of rental assistance\nin private accommodations para iel to the federal\nrent subsidy program established by Section 23 of\nthe United States Housing Act of 1937.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I question the wisdom of the state's entering into\na program of this type when the action taken by the\nfederal government since 1968 has been directed\ntoward assisting low income families in obtaining\nnew housing through home ownership and mortgage\nfinancing for low-income rental projects.\n\"Further, I question the reality of approving a\nmeasure which can only be implemented by the\nexpenditure of millions of dollars of taxpayers'\nfunds at a time when the state is faced with the\nneed to find additional revenues just to meet\ncurrent obligations.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 1098 - Z'berg\nMakes provisions for increased retirement benefits\nfor local safety members of the Public Employees'\nRetirement System applicable to all contracting\nagencies on July 1, 1973.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"Cities and counties already are authorized to\nprovide the level of retirement benefits proposed\nby this bill. Each local entity is free to provide\nsuch benefits based on local needs and financial\nresources. The measure, in my opinion, tends to\nnegate the 'meet and confer' provisions of existing\nlaw as they relate to local safety members.\n\"The bill would impose a substantial burden on the\nlocal property taxpayer at a time when property\ntaxes have reached alltime highs. It is estimated\nthat this measure would result in increased property\ntaxes to city residents of more than $30 million\nannually.\n\"The bill also commits the General Fund to an annual\nexpenditure of up to $10 million for at least 30\nyears, at a time when the state is experiencing\nextreme difficulty in funding programs which command\na high priority.\n\"Finally, this legislation would cause interference\nwith local government employer-employee relations\nand an imposition by the state of substantial\nadditional costs on local government. Any benefit\nstructure should be a result of the negotiation\nprocess between the public employer and affected\nemployees. Employee benefits for employees of local\ngovernment should not be mandated by the state.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 1204 - Townsend\nWould require contractors on a construction project\nto maintain adequate emergency first aid medical\ntreatment for the employees.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The legislative counsel is of the opinion that the\nphrase 'adequate emergency first aid medical\ntreatment' means having medical personnel and\nequipment to administer emergency first aid. This\ncould mean having a doctor, nurse, or other medical\npersonnel trained to give medical treatment, and\nhaving facilities equipped to permit emergency first\naid treatment by medical personnel. While this\nresult may not have been intended, it would impose\nan unwarranted burden on contractors. The subject\nof first aid and medical attention on job sites is\nalready covered by Construction Safety Order 1512.\nI would suggest that the interested parties meet with representatives of\nthe Department of Industrial Relations to determine the need, if any,\nfor legislation in this subject area.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned, # the governor said.\n- 8 -\n#716\nAB 1355 - Fenton\nWould extend mandatory unemployment coverage to\nagricultural workers.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"While I actively support unemployment insurance for\nfarm workers on a national basis, I cannot approve\nlegislation that would further increase the\ncompetitive disadvantages faced by California's\nagricultural community.\n\"The benefits payable under AB 1355 will exceed farm\nemployer taxes by at least $37 million, which will\nhave to be financed from taxes paid by nonfarm\nemployers who already are among the highest taxes\nin the country.\n\"The U.S. Department of Labor is presently drafting\nlegislation to provide unemployment insurance\ncoverage for farm workers on a nationwide basis.\nI intend to support this proposal when it is\npresented to the Congress.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2177 - Brathwaite Would require the Director of Health Care Services\nto establish authorization criteria for Medi-Cal\nconsultants to expedite the movement of long-term\ncare patients from hospitals to nursing homes.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"This proposal is not necessary since current\nregulations and guidelines concerning hospital\nadmissions, length-of-stay in a hospital, and\nnursing home admissions already deal with the proble\nset forth in the bill. The Department of Health\nCare Services, as the single state agency for the\nMedicaid program in California, is obligated by the\nFederal Social Security Act to assure that payments\nand services are at appropriate levels.\nAuthorizations of hospital stays beyond that\nconsidered medically necessary by both the attending\nphysician and Medi-Cal consultant are not presently\ngranted.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\n- 9 -\n#716\nSB 57 - Lagomarsino W. Id increase retirement ber. its for those state\nemployees or their survivors who retired on or\nbefore December 31, 1969.\nREASON FOR VETO:\nRetired members of the Public Employees' Retirement\nSystem now have a permanent and automatic cost of\nliving program as a result of legislation I signed\ninto law. Under this law, retired members of the\nSystem already are eligible for automatic and\ncontinuous increases related to rises in the cost of\nliving in the future. Thes year covered retirees\nreceived a 6 percent increase and in April of the\ncoming year will receive a 3.6 percent increase.\n\"I do not believe that one-time increases in\nretirement allowances as proposed by this bill are\nappropriate when a permanent program has been\ninstituted.\n\"The rdtirement allowance increase included in the bill\nwould have been operative only if legislation had\nbeen enacted at the 1971 regular session to increase\nGeneral Fund revenues beyond that amount necessary\nto maintain programs in dollar amounts allocated in\nthe 1971 Budget Act. General Fund revenues were\nnot increased as required by this bill.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the\ngovernor said.\nAB 2552 - Moretti\nCreates a Victim Compensation Commission to investi-\ngate and adjudicate claims of citizens who are\nvictims of violent crimes, raises the maximum\ncompensation to $25,000 per claim, and creates\na Victim Compensation Fund.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"This measure proposes the creation of a new\ncommission to administer a program which is now\nadministered by the State Board of Control. I see\nno reason to establish a new commission. The Board\nof Control is currently performing this service in an\nadmirable manner.\n\"This measure also removes the test of need and\nrevises upward the awards limits. Liberalizing such a\nprogram of indemnification will elicit potentially\nthousands of new claims each year. There is serious\ndoubt that the proposed penalty assessment will\nsupport such a program. I am convinced that the\npresent program best serves the total interests of\nthe State, as it indemnifies only those persons who\nare truly in need of such indemnification.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" \" the\ngovernor said.\n# # # #\n- 10 -\nEJG\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERN\nRELEASE: Imme\nate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-22-71\n#717\nGovernor Ronald Reagan has signed legislation designed to\ncontrol snowmobiles, motorcycles, dune buggies and other passenger-\ncarrying off-highway motor vehicles while it also provides for the\ndevelopment of special recreational facilities for those who use them;\nThe measure, (AB 2342) by Assemblyman Gene Chappie, (R-Cool)\nwill require the registration and licensing of the vehicles with the\nfees to go into a special Off-Highway Vehicle Fund for the development\nof trails and other special recreational facilities by the Department\nof Parks and Recreation and local governments.\n\"This legislation will provide controls to prevent depredation\nby those few riders who have been responsible for destruction of the\nenvironment; will provide public facilities for the more than three\nmillion motoring enthusiasts who are concerned with the environment and\nprovide facilities for them to use,\" the governor said.\nThe law, which will become effective July 1, 1972, also requires\nthe vehicles to be equipped with adequate mufflers.\nUnder the law, a $15 fee will be required every two years. Of\nthe amount, $5 will go to the Department of Motor Vehicles for\ncertification and issuance of license plates; $6 will go to the\nDepartment of Parks and Recreation's Off-Highway Vehicle Fund for\ndevelopment of trails and other facilities, and $4 will go to the\ncounties of the state in lieu of other state and local funds, for\nmanaging and maintaining off-highway facilities.\n#####\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERN\nRELEASE: Imme ite\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-22-71\n#718\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today appointed five new members and\nreappointed 11 members to the California Regional Water Quality Control\nBoard.\nFor the North Coastal Region, the governor named Gordon W. Miller\n551 Wikiup Drive, Santa Rosa, to succeed George A. Dinsmore of Fortuna,\nand reappointed Harry Crebbin of 610 Jackson Street, Yreka. Both are\nRepublicans.\nMiller, chief engineer and manager for the Sonoma County Water\nAgency, will represent water supply, and Crebbin, manager of the\nYreka Chamber of Commerce, a board member since 1967, represents\nmunicipal government.\nFor the Central Coastal Region, William B. Burr, Jr., of\n909 Foothill Road, Ojai, was appointed to replace Mrs. Jean Auer,\nformerly of Santa Barbara, who now serves on the San Francisco Bay\nRegion Board.\nBurr, president of Industrial Tools Inc., of Ojai, will\nrepresent the public.\nReappointed were Eugene E. Brendlin, 5520 Vida Street,\nAtascadero, retired manager of the California State Polytechnic\nCollege Foundation, and Floyd M. Grigory, P. O. Box 173, San Ardo,\na farmer.\nBrendlin, a board member since 1967, represents water supply,\nwhile Grigory, who has served since 1971, represents irrigated agriculture\nBoth are Republicans.\nFor the Los Angeles Region, Allan Harris of 4250 Park Newport,\nNewport Beach, was named to succeed Thomas H. Gaines, Jr., of Costa\nMesa, who has resigned.\nHarris, manager of the In Plant Product Development Corporation\nof Long Beach, will represent industrial waste. He is not registered\nwith a political party.\nReappointed was Arthur E. Bruington of 363 West Hermosa Drive,\nSan Gabriel, Chief Deputy Engineer for the Los Angeles County Flood\nControl District. A member since 1968, he represents counties. He\nis a Republican.\nFor the Central Valley Region. Clifford C. Wisdom of 1179 Elmwood\nAvenue, Stockton, was named to replace Robert L. Wall of Madera.\n-1-\n#718\nWisdom, chairman of the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors,\nwill represent county government. He is a Republican.\nReappointed was Marvin E. Ray, 2317 Monticello Avenue, Modesto,\ndeputy city manager of Modesto. A member since 1971, he represents\nmunicipal government. He is a Republican.\nFor the Colorado River Basin Region, Stuart W. Gummer of\n82299 Sierra Avenue, Indio, was named to succeed E. F. Bevens of Blythe\nwho has resigned.\nGummer, an Indio civic leader and sporting goods shop owner,\nwill represent wildlife and recreation on the board. He is a\nRepublican.\nReappointed for the Colorado River Basin Region were Keith\nH. Ainsworth, 81960 Lancer Way, Indio, and Harry Schmitz, 43900\nPrimrose Drive, Palm Desert.\nAinsworth, assistant general manager of the Coachella Valley\nWater District, represents water users. He has served on the board\nsince 1968. He is a Republican.\nSchmitz, senior planner for the Riverside County Planning\nDepartment, has represented county government on the board since\n1969. He is a Republican.\nReappointed for the Santa Ana Region were Everett L. Grubb,\n6979 Palm Court, Riverside, and Everett C. Ross, 2529 Piedmont Drive,\nRiverside.\nGrubb, past president of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water\nDistrict, has served on the board since 1971, representing county\ngovernment. He is a Republican.\nRoss, public utilities director for the City of Riverside, has\nrepresented municipal government on the board since 1964. He is a\nRepublican.\nReappointed for the San Diego Region were Einer A. May, 12448\nVaughan Road, Poway, and William S. Tellam, P. O. Box 615, Julian.\nMay, vice president of the Poway Municipal Water District, and\nTellman, a rancher, have served on the board since 1968. May has\nrepresented municipal government while Tellam has represented irrigated\nagriculture. Both are Republicans.\n# # #\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nMEMO TO TH PRESS\nSacramento, Californ\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n12-23-71\n# 719\nGovernor Ronald Reagan announced today that he has vetoed the\nfollowing bills:\nAB 1970 - McCarthy\nAuthorizes a school district maintaining a com-\nmunity college to exempt from payment of all or\npart of nonresident tuition fees, nonresidents\nwho are both citizens and residents of a foreign\ncountry and hold \"J\" visas rather than non-\nresidents who are both citizens and residents of\na foreign country.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"This bill, if approved, would chapter out the\nprovisions of SB 1607 (Chapter 629). SB 1607\nmodifies the formula for computation of nonresi-\ndent tuition charges at the community colleges.\nIt is important to the community colleges that\nthe provisions of SB 1607 remain in effect.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2018 - Chacon\nChanges the observance of Admission Day from\nthe 9th day of September to the second Monday\nin September.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I have no objections to AB 2018. However, it\nwould chapter out a significant provision of\nthe Bank Extraordinary Situation Closing Act\n(Chapter 932). I have requested that repre-\nsentatives of the banking industry work closely\nwith the author and the school administrators'\nassociations to insure that a bill containing\nthe provisions of AB 2018 is enacted early next\nsession.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2456 - Hayes\nRequires the retirement board of a retirement\nsystem, established pursuant to the County\nEmployees' Retirement Law of 1937, to file a\ndisability retirement application for a safety\nmember who is also a department head under\nspecified circumstances.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"AB 2456 is intended to affect only one county\nemployee. No compelling evidence has been\npresented to me which supports the need for this\nspecial legislation.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned, 11\nthe governor said.\nAB 2716 - Warren\nRequires a drastic restructuring of the Los\nAngeles Unified School District's Board of\nEducation.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The need for meaningful public involvement in\nthe decision making process of the Los Angeles\nUnified School District's Board of Education is\ndesirable. However, there are compelling\nreasons why this particular measure should be vetoed. The last minute\namendment restructuring the Board of Education is not in the interest of\npublic involvement. The bill, as amended on December 1, would require\nan election of all eleven board members in the Spring of 1973. This\nelection would not only include the four new members to be added, but\nalso the existing members who would have over half of their term yet to\nrun. Such a procedure constitutes poor public administration.\n-1-\n#719\nAB 2716 (continued)\n\"Furthermore, AB 2716 violates the principle\nof home rule. It runs counter to the California\nConstitution, in that the Charter of the City\nof Los Angeles, in accordance with the Constitu-\ntion, provides for the number of board members\nand for their manner of election.\n\"A shift to the election of board members by\ndistricts would not guarantee the election of a\nminority group representative, even though that\nis the intent of the amendment. At the same\ntime, it would almost certainly guarantee the\ncreation of pressures which would tend to equal-\nize school expenditures by electoral districts,\nrather than allowing for the expenditure of funds\nto meet the most pressing student needs. This\nresult most certainly would work to the disad-\nvantage of minority pupils.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2971 - Miller\nAllows a criminal under a life sentence to be\ndischarged from parole after five years.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The persons covered by this bill are first\ndegree murderers, habitual criminals and kidnap-\nrape felons. The law requires now that these\npersons remain on parole for life unless they\nare pardoned or their sentences are commuted by\nthe governor.\n\"Under this bill, these serious offenders could\nbe released from parole supervision without the\ngovernor's authorization.\n\"I believe that to remove this responsibility,\nwhich the law has vested in the governor for\nmany years, would eliminate an important safe-\nguard desired and expected by society.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2987 - Z'berg\nCreates the State Board of Registration for\nProfessional Foresters.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"While I approve of the bill's stated objectives,\nI believe the need for accomplishing them through\nthe licensing program, which this bill proposes,\nhas not been demonstrated. Alternative methods\nshould be explored which do not involve this\ntype of entry by the state into a new area of\nregulation.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 3066 - Z'berg\nProvides for submission to the voters at the\n1972 General Election of the State Beach, Park,\nRecreational, and Historical Facilities Bond Act of 1972, which, if\nadopted, would authorize issuance of bonds in the amount of $250,000,000\nto provide funds to acquire and establish beaches, parks, recreational\nfacilities, and historical resources.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I recognize the great need for more parks at\nboth the state and local level, and I support\nthe concept of acquiring and developing parks\nthrough the issuance of bonds.\n-2-\n#719\nAB 3066 (continued)\n\"The Director of Parks and Recreation informs me\nample funds are already available to carry on an\nexpansion of the State Park System for the next\ntwo years. These monies consist of Federal Land\nand Water Conservation funds of approximately\n$20 million; an unexpended balance of the 1964\nBond Act of some $25 million; $60 million in\nbonds voted in 1970 under Proposition 20; and\napproximately $25 million for park and beach\nacquisition from income tax withholding. These\nfunds total some $130 million.\n\"I intend to propose a new bond issue for parks\nand recreation when the need warrants.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nSB 60 - Moscone\nEstablishes a procedure for late registration\napplicable to all statewide elections or special\nelections to fill a congressional or state\nlegislative vacancy. It would provide that late\nregistration for such elections would begin on\nthe 53rd day before election and end on the 19th\nday before election.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"SB 60 would impose an unwarranted additional\nburden on county clerks and registrars of voters.\nThe present Elections Code requirement that\nregistration be completed prior to 53 days\nbefore an election facilitates the proper con-\nduct of elections.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nSB 108 - Mills\nRequires that $60,000 per month from the newly\nestablished Transportation Planning and Research\nAccount be made available to the Department of\nPublic Works for allocation to eligible bicycle\nland and equestrian path projects by cities,\ncounties, and state agencies.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"Such monies as prove to be available to the\nfund established by SB 325 (Chapter 1400) will\nrepresent for the first time an ability by this\nstate to fund transportation planning which is\ngenuinely multi-modal in its scope. It is my\nbelief that appropriations from this fund should\nbe preceded by a careful examination of all\ncompeting claims on it. This measure prematurely\nallocates a specific amount of money without the\nbenefit of the kind of examination, which I\nbelieve should be undertaken first.\n\"I already have approved legislation (Chapter\n1361) which authorizes local government to\nestablish exclusive paths for bicycles, and\nauthorizes the designing of such facilities into\nfreeway projects whenever the master plan of the\nlocal agency requires it.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nSB 1467 - Dymally\nEstablishes a commission to study the need for\nand status of medical schools in this state and\nappropriates $250,000 from the contingent fund of the Board of Medical\nExaminers for this purpose.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The Board of Medical Examiners has informed me\nthat the intent of this measure can be accom-\nplished under the auspices of AB 2427 (Chapter 1498, Statutes of 1971)\nwhich authorizes the Board of Medical Examiners to evaluate medical\nschool curricula and appropriates $125,000 for that purpose. Approval\nof this measure would result in two independent studies, duplicating a\nsubstantial portion of the same subject matter.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the governor said.\n-3-\n#719\nAB 728 - Brathwaite\nAuthorizes a surviving spouse to file a joint\nstate income tax return for two years following\nthe year of death of the husband or wife. It\nIt would have become operative only if a system\nof payroll withholding had been enacted at the\n1971 regular session of the legislature.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I have no objections to this proposal. However,\nAB 728 has no legal effect since a system of\npayroll withholding was not enacted at the 1971\nregular session as required by Section 3 of the\nbill. I will support this proposal if it is\nintroduced again next year.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2037 - Greene (Bill) Establishes the Watts Industrial Fair in desig-\nnated area of Los Angeles County.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The 48th District Agricultural Association, of\nwhich the area of the proposed Watts Industrial\nFair is a part, is located in the urban area of\nthe City of Commerce. This district fair is in\nthe process of re-orienting its direction toward\nconsumer and industrial education. Thus, the\nadvantages proposed for the Watts fair would be\navailable through the 48th District Fair.\n\"This bill might also set a precedent of estab-\nlishing new fairs at a time when a study is now\nunder way to improve the efficiency of all state\nsupported fairs.\n\"This bill will add an annual cost of $65,000 to\nthe fair program for operational support of the\nnew fair, thus reducing General Fund revenue in\nthe same amount. In addition, the undetermined\namount of money needed for acquisition of land\nand the construction of facilities will reduce\nthe funds available to other fairs for capital\noutlay purposes in the same amount.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2282 - Thomas\nRequires the Department of Navigation and Ocean\nDevelopment to enter into an agreement with the\nCity of Avalon for construction or modification\nof a steamer pier within Avalon harbor, subject\nto certification by the Director of Finance that\nthe city is financially capable of repaying a\nspecified loan.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"There already are statutory authority and fiscal\nresources available to construct feasible boat-\ning facilities within Avalon Harbor. The agree-\nment required by this bill is in derogation of\nthe department's statutory responsibility to\napprove only those loans based on economic and\nengineering feasibility considerations.\n\"The Department of Navigation and Ocean Develop-\nment already is working with the City of Avalon\nto enhance the benefits of harbor improvement\nprojects constructed with $2.5 million in loans\nfrom the State Harbors and Watercraft Revolving\nFund. Additionally, the department has offered\nthe city an emergency storm damage loan to repair\nrecent damage.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" \"\nthe governor said.\n-4-\n#719\nSB 216 - Way\nIncreases the membership of the Adult Authority\nfrom 9 to 12, and would specify qualifications\nfor membership.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The addition of three new members to the Adult\nAuthority, at an annual cost of more than\n$145,000, cannot be justified at a time when\nthe number of inmates in California's correc-\ntional institutions continues to decline. In\nJanuary, 1969, there were 28,600 inmates in the\nstate's prisons. Today, the total is less than\n21,000.\n\"In addition, a governor should have the widest\nlatitude in considering appointments to the\nAdult Authority. To restrict his discretion by\nspecifying qualifications for membership is\nunwarranted and could lead to a diminution of\nthe board's effectiveness in considering inmates'\nterms and their individual problems.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nSB 433 - Collier\nAuthorizes the California State College Trustees,\nupon approval of the student body, to establish\nan activities fee to support instructionally\nrelated programs at those state colleges where\na student body organization is not in effect.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"Instructionally related activities on campus\nhave usually included art exhibits, dramatic\nproductions, concerts, journalism, creative writ-\ning activities, and intercollegiate athletics.\nThese activities are generally associated with\nindividual courses, or in some cases, blocks of\ncourses, and are considered by instructors to\nbe as central to meaningful education as chemis-\ntry laboratory classes are to chemistry. A part\nof these activities are generally funded from\nstudent body activity fees.\n\"This measure is an attempt to fund instruction-\nally-related activities at those state colleges\nwhere student fees are not available because\nstudent body organizations have been voted out\nby the students.\n\"I am vetoing this measure at the request of the\nTrustees of the California State Colleges who\nfeel that this measure does not present a work-\nable solution. It provides that the trustees\nmay institute a fee only 'upon the approval of a\nmajority of the students who vote in a formally\nconstituted election.\n\"Such a provision solves nothing for the opera-\ntion of instructionally related activities on a\ncampus, inasmuch as students already can estab-\nlish student body organizations and student\nactivity fees under existing provisions of the\nEducation Code, 'upon the approval of a majority\nof the students who vote in a formally constituted\nelection.\n\"Students at a college without a student govern-\nment in existence now, can by majority vote, re-\ninstitute this approach to student body fees and\nthus impose the fee. Therefore, such a change\nto the code adds nothing to alleviate any current\nhardships of funding these instructionally\nrelated programs.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\n-5-\n#719\nGovernor Reagan also announced today that he has signed the\nfollowing bills, with certain deletions or reductions in appropriations:\nAB 792 - Ralph\nIncludes among the duties of the State Fair\n(Chapter 1814)\nEmployment Practice Commission the duty to\ninvestigate, approve, and certify equal employ-\nment opportunity programs submitted to it by\ncontractors on state-awarded public works con-\ntracts in excess of $200,000, and to fix and\ncollect fees necessary for the cost thereof.\nAB 1455 - Z'berg\nProvides Unemployment Insurance benefits to\n(Chapter 1815)\nfull-time employees of the University of Cali-\nfornia and State Colleges who are laid off after\nMarch 1, 1971, through December 31, 1971, for\nreasons of economy.\n(The governor deleted the $350,000 appropriation\ncontained in Section 4 of AB 1455 because the\nunemployment insurance benefits provided by\nthe bill can be funded from existing appropria-\ntions.)\nAB 2647 - Lanterman\nProvides special procedure for disposition of\n(Chapter 1817)\nmentally retarded criminal defendants found not\nmentally competent to stand trial.\nAB 3004 - Vasconcellos\nAppropriates $80,000 to the Regents of the\n(Chapter 1818)\nUniversity of California to be expended for the\ndrug abuse information project.\n(The governor reduced the appropriation from\n$80,000 to $10,000. The University of California\nreports that all funds appropriated for the\ndrug abuse information project have been expended\nand that $10,000 is necessary to continue the\nprogram in 1971-72. The balance of the appro-\npriation contained in AB 3004 is intended to\nimplement the evaluation phases of the project\nduring the current fiscal year. Financial\nsupport for the evaluation phase of the project\ncan come from funds already appropriated for\npublic service or organized research programs\nof the University.\n# # #\n-6-\nEJG\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERN(\nRELEASE: Immed. ce\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-23-71\n#720\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today announced the reappointment of\nAlfonso L. Romero, San Jose attorney, and Robert N. Rouch, Fresno\ncertified public accountant, to four-year-terms on the California\nVeterans Board\nRomero, who lives at 625 Sobrato Drive, Campbell, has served\non the board since 1968, while Rouch, who lives at 2165 18th Avenue,\nKingsburg, has served since 1969. Both men are Republicans.\nThe appointments are subject to Senate confirmation.\nMembers of the board receive $20 per day while on official\nduty.\n######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERN\nRELEASE: Immed te\nSacramento, Californ\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-23-71\n#721\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today named Paul J. Clifton, projects\ncoordinator for the Resources Agency, to the Western Interstate\nNuclear Board.\nCreated by 1968 legislation, the board considers and recommends\npolicies to be followed in nuclear opportunities and problems in the\n13 western states.\nClifton, 51, who began his state career in the Department of\nWater Resources in 1965, has served as Nuclear Coordinator for the\nstate since 1969 and has represented the secretary of Resources on the\nState Environmental Quality Study Council.\nHe is married and has two children. The family lives at 3007\nSandhurst Court, Sacramento.\nClifton is a Republican.\nThe post pays necessary expenses.\n######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNO\nRELEASE: Immed.\nbe\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-23-71\n#722\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today appointed Los Angeles County\nAssistant Counsel Alexander R. Early III to the Los Angeles County\nSuperior Court.\nEarly, 54, a Republican, will receive an annual salary of\n$33,396. He will succeed Judge John S. Frazer who has retired.\nPrior to joining the Los Angeles County Counsel's office in\n1957, Early served as an assistant United States attorney in\nLos Angeles and as a senior attorney for the State Department of Public\nWorks in Los Angeles.\nHe previously had practiced law privately in Los Angeles since\n1947.\nA graduate of Cornell University, Early earned his law degree\nfrom Harvard Law School.\nHe has served as a judge pro-tem of the Los Angeles County\nSuperior Court and is a member of the Los Angeles County Bar Association,\nthe State Bar of California, the Federal Bar Association, the American\nSociety of Appraisers, the American Board of Trial Advocates, the\nAmerican Right of Way Association, the State Association of County\nAppraisers and other professional, civic and service groups.\nIn addition, he is author of numerous works that have\nappeared in legal publications.\nHe and his wife, Mary, have three children. The family lives\nin La Canada.\n#######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERN\nRELEASE: Imme\nte\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-23-71\n#723\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today named one new member and reappointed\nthree other members of the State Scholarship and Loan Commission.\nThe new member is Dr. Edward Simonsen, superintendent of the Kern\nJoint Junior College District. He will fill the unexpired term of\nCharles F. Herndon of San Anselmo, who has resigned. The term ends in\nOctober, 1973.\nDr. Simonsen, a Republican, will represent junior colleges on the\ncommission. He lives at 3801 Country Club Drive, Bakersfield.\nReappointed to four-year-terms were Dr. Fred L. Casmin, professor\nof speech at Pepperdine College, Dr. Charles J. Dirksen, dean of the\nGraduate School of Business at the University of Santa Clara, and\nErskine J. Sandys, manager of the Pacific Telephone Company at La\nJolla. All are Republicans and have served since 1967.\nDr. Casmir, a resident of Inglewood, represents private schools\nwhile Dr. Dirksen, who lives at 1465 Calaveras Avenue, San Jose,\nrepresents private universities and Sandys of 5928 Beaumont Avenue,\nLa Jolla, represents the public.\nThe appointments are subject to Senate confirmation.\nCommissioners serve four-year terms and receive necessary\nexpenses.\n#####\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERN\nMEMO TO THE PRF\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-24-71\n#724\nThe following is the text of a letter from Governor Ronald\nReagan to Lawrence Robinson, Jr., Chairman of the Board of Control:\n\"I have just learned of the award of $5,000 approved by the\nBoard of Control for an employee of the Department of Water Resources,\nfor a suggestion which proposed a design change in the Oroville-\nThermalito power generating complex. This change, I understand, has\ncontributed to an anticipated increase of salable power of more than\n$26,000,000 over the 31 year period of the contract.\n\"It is important to our continuing efforts to obtain, from all\nsources, those constructive ideas which result in reducing the cost of\noperating our state government. I have already taken note that the\nstate's Merit Award suggestion program plays an important part in the\norderly submission and evaluation of ideas, contributed by state\nemployees. Therefore, we must do everything possible to keep open this\nchannel for the flow of ideas.\n\"Recognizing that cash awards for adopted suggestions are not,\nin themselves, the only incentives for the contribution of helpful\nsuggestions, I do feel that those employees who submit their ideas\nthrough the suggestion program, and who meet all the standards for\naward eligibility, should reasonably expect to receive the cash rewards\nwe offer as inducements for doing SO.\nI hope that you and the other members of your board will agree\nwith this reasoning, and will wish to review your action on this award,\nto determine if this level of recognition is in the best interests of\nemployee morale and employee willingness to continue to contribute their\nvaluable ideas.\"\n######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERN\nRELEASE: Im liate\nSacramento, Californ\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-28-71\n#725\nHere is the text of a letter from Governor Ronald Reagan in\nresponse to a telegram from Governor William G. Milliken of Michigan\nsuggesting a wager on the outcome of the January 1, Rose Bowl Game\nbetween the University of Michigan and Stanford University:\n\"I accept your wager on the outcome of the Rose Bowl Game,\nalthough it is difficult to decide what to put up against your Michigan\nwine and snowballs.\n\"At first, I considered wagering some oranges. (California, as\nyou know, abounds with oranges when your state is coated with snow).\n\"Then, I thought of offering a bouquet of fragrant California\nroses. (You are aware, of course, that roses bloom in profusion in our\nstate when Michigan bushes are decorated with icicles).\n\"My problem, as you can well understand, is a matter of selection\nsince California is blessed with an overabundance of all of nature's\ngifts.\n\"But now that you have offered a bottle of Michigan wine, packed\nin Michigan snowballs, I will attempt to keep things more or less equal.\n\"In the highly unlikely event that Michigan beats Stanford, I\nwill send you a bottle of California wine packed in snowballs made from\nthe pure, pristine flakes that fall gently on the slopes of our high\nSierra. (California, I don't have to remind you, has the finest wines\nand the best winter sports country in the world).\n\"If this meets with your approval, the bet is on. But, please\ndon't bring the Michigan snowballs to Pasadena on January 1...they will\nmelt in our warm, golden California sunshine!\"\n#####\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERN\nRELEASE: In ediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-28-71\n#726\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today announced the reappointment\nof Roy E. Reynolds of Long Beach and Roy E. Parker of San Diego to the\nState Board of Accountancy in the Department of Consumer Affairs.\nReynolds, a Norwalk accountant, has served on the board since\n1968. He lives at 3144 Val Verde, Long Beach. He is a Republican.\nParker, a San Diego accountant, has been a member of the board\nsince 1970. He lives at 2705 Granada, San Diego. He is a Republican.\nBoth men represent public accountants on the board.\nBoard members receive $25 per diem plus expenses and serve\nfour year terms.\n#########\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVER\nR\nRELEASE: In diate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-28-71\n#727\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today appointed Robert A. Houghton,\ndirector of the Division of Law Enforcement in the State Department\nof Justice, to the board of the Califo rnia Crime Technological Research\nFoundation.\nHoughton, 58, prior to his appointment to the justice department\npost in July of this year, was assistant chief and director of operations\nfor the Los Angeles Police Department.\nHe will succeed Orville J. Hawkins of Sacramento, on the\nfoundation board, representing the justice department.\nHoughton, a Republican, lives at 13305 Arminta Street, North\nHollywood.\nThe appointment is subject to Senate confirmation.\nMembers of the foundation serve at the pleasure of the governor\nand receive necessary expenses.\n#######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nSacramento, Californ\nMEMO 1 THE PRESS\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-29-71\nGovernor Reagan will hold a press conference on the subject of\nreapportionment tomorrow, Thursday, December 30, at 11 a.m., in\nLos Angeles at the Century Plaza Hotel (Pacific Palisades Room).\n####\nEJG\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immedia+\nSacramento, Californ:\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-29-71\n#728\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today issued the following New Year\nMessage:\n\"The New Year is a time for reflection and resolve. It is a\ntime to look back upon the road we traveled and to look forward to the\npath we must follow.\n\"As we begin our journey into 1972, let us resolve that we\nwill continue to walk the path of peace with justice. And let us\nremember that each of us, with every step we take, has the responsibility\nto mark the trail toward a lasting peace, toward brotherhood and\ntoward harmony between man and nature.\"\n####\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE:\nIm\nediate\nSacrament Californi\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n12-30-71\n#729\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today issued the following statement:\n\"When the legislature adjourned its regular session early this\nmonth without complying with its constitutional mandate to reapportion\nthe Assembly, Senate and Congressional districts, I immediately called\nthem back. In doing so, I shared the hopes of all Californians that\ncheir elected representatives would put aside strictly selfish, parti-\nsan interests and instead work out a fair plan putting the interests\nof the people and their communities first.\n\"But our hopes quickly faded as once again the legislative process\ndeteriorated into blatant partisanship. The Democrats, who control\nthe legislature, were in a position to work out a good and fair plan\ngiving the highest priority to preserving community interests and fair\nrepresentation for ethnic minorities.\n\"Regrettably, the Democratic leadership ignored these and other\nimportant factors. So they drew tortuous boundary lines around arti-\nficial and bizarre shaped districts aimed solely at perpetuating them-\nselves in office.\n\"The Democrats made no secret of the fact that their bills were\ntotally partisan---and therefore unfair to their Republican colleagues.\nFar worse, however, was the unfair way in which these gerrymandered\nbills split communities throughout the state and minimized representa-\ntion of minority groups who hoped that finally their particular concerns\nmight be met.\nunsupportable\n\"These bills did such odd and\nthings as placing the same\npeople in two different districts at the same time through overlapping\nboundaries, and using precinct boundaries instead of census tract lines.\nThat makes it impossible to prove a district has equal population\nbecause precincts only show party registration.\n\"The U.S. Supreme Court has held that legislatures must prove that\nthey have made a good faith effort to achieve substantial equality\netween districts according to population. It has also been held by\nother courts throughout the country that a reapportionment plan can or\nshould give attention to contiguity, compactness, preservation of\ncommunities of interest, avoidance of partisan gerrymanders, protection\nof the rights of minority groups, and access between different regions\nwithin a district.\n-1-\n#729\n\"These bills clearly fall short of these standards.\n\"I would be derelict in my responsibility as governor to sign\nthese bills into law. I cannot take pleasure, however, in announcing\nthat I have today vetoed these three bills.\n\"Because of the seeming impasse of the legislature and its\ninability to act, at least so far, I sincerely hope the Reapportionment\nCommission under the leadership of the lieutenant governor, will con-\ntinue its studies.\n\"Our goal is still a fair reapportionment something California\nhas not had for many years.\n\"Out of all our deliberations, including the work of the Reappor-\ntionment Commission and the legislature, we can still make a new and\npositive beginning toward preventing the difficulties we have experienced\non reapportionment difficulties which have cast the entire\ngovernmental process into disrepute.\n\"But more important, we can seek to assure the people of\nCalifornia that they will be fairly and honestly represented in the\nlegislature and the congress. \"\n# # #\n-2-\nEJG\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nMEMO TO THE PRESS\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n12-30-71\n#730\nEnclosed are maps of various Assembly,\nSenate and Congressional districts as proposed\nby bills enacted by the Democratic-dominated\nlegislature. The following descriptions are\naimed at assisting you in seeing some of the\nreasons for the governor's vetoes of these\nbills. (The descriptions relate to maps that\nare enclosed.)\n(NOTE: For your information, special permission\nhas been granted for reproduction of\nthese maps. You will note that some of\nthe maps contain a copyright clause, but\nspecial permission has been granted for\nreproduction of them.)\n(STATEWIDE MAP - CD 36)\nThe 36th district in Kings, Kern and San Luis Obispo counties has a\nlong arm with almost no population in it, and no road in it connecting\none end to the other, reaching all the way down the coastline to take\nGoleta and Isla Vista out of Santa Barbara County. The people at the\nend of this arm are effectively cut off from the rest of the district\nand denied the opportunity for effective representation.\n(ELOWUP OF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 17 MAP)\nThe 17th district in San Mateo and Santa Clara counties has a heavily\nMexican-American area on the east side of San Jose connected like an\nappendage to the bulk of the district by a narrow corridor that splits\nthe downtown area of San Jose. The people at the end of this corridor\nare discriminated against because they have little common interest with\nthe main part of the district, and are unnecessarily far removed from\nthe main part of the district.\n-1-\n#730\n(ORANGE COUNTY BLOWUP MAP)\nOrange County and the communities within it are unnecessarily divided\ninto six different congressional districts, instead of the slightly\nover three full districts to which its population entitles it. This\ndecreases the effective voice of this growing area by putting most\nOrange County residents in districts dominated by population centers\nsometimes far removed in distance and interests from their own area.\n(STATEWIDE MAP - SD 15)\nThe 15th district contains two large areas at opposite sides of the\nstate\none bordering on the Pacific Ocean and the other on the Arizona-\nNevada border connected only by an extremely narrow corridor through\na sparsely populated area of the Central Valley. These virtually non-\ncontiguous parts of the 15th district make effective communication\nwithin the district unlikely and make effective representation unneces-\nsarily difficult.\n(BLOWUP OF SD 10)\nThe San Mateo portion of the 10th district is only technically con-\nnected to the San Francisco and Marin portions across the waters of\nSan Francisco Bay, where the county boundaries meet. The voters of the\nSan Mateo portion of the district are unnecessarily separated from the\nSan Francisco and Marin portions, making representation for them more\ndifficult and less effective.\n(BLOWUP OF SD 25)\nThe 25th district stretches along the length of the coastline from\nOxnard in Ventura County in the north in a sometimes very narrow\ncorridor south to the Palos Verdes peninsula in Los Angeles County.\nVoters at one end of the district have few common interests with voters\nat the other end and are unnecessarily separated in distance.\n(BLOWUP OF SD 27)\nThe 27th district wanders in a narrow corridor across the heart of\nLos Angeles, arbitrarily splitting local communities from Santa Monica\non the coast, through Culver City, Hollywood, Los Angeles, Glendale\nand Pasadena to the boundary of the Angeles National Forest. This\nis a blatant gerrymander for partisan political purposes, dividing\nthe voice of these local communities and needlessly confusing the\nvoter.\n-2-\n#730\n(SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY - PARTS OF ADs 9, 10, 12 and 30)\nSan Joaquin County's 290,000 citizens are entitled to 1.16 Assemblymen\nunder the court-required equality standards. AB 12 would carve the\ncounty and its principal city, Stockton, into parts of four districts,\nonly one of the incumbents of which is likely to be a resident of\nSan Joaquin County.\n(BLOWUP OF AD 10)\nThe 10th district stretches between three widely-separated centers of\npopulation- Contra Costa County, San Joaquin County in the Central\nValley and in San Jose at the southern end of the Bay. All are con-\nnected by sparsely populated or unpopulated corridors. The residents\nof these areas have few interests in common, but are denied effective\nrepresentation because of the widely-dispersed portions of the district\nwandering around Central California and the Bay Area.\n(BLOWUP OF AD 18)\nThe 18th district is comprised of two virtually non-contiguous parts of\nthe city of San Francisco, connected only by a corridor the width of a\nstreet in an obvious gerrymander for political advantage. This has the\neffect of virtually separating the 19th AD into two separate parts.\nThis is confusing to the voters of each district, makes effective rep-\nresentation unnecessarily difficult, and needlessly divides local\ncommunities of interest.\n(STATEWIDE MAP - AD 31)\nThe 31st district contains part or all of Santa Cruz, San Benito,\nMonterey, Fresno, Madera, and Merced counties. Coastal Santa Cruz\nCounty contains virtually half the district's population and would\ndominate the election of the district's Assemblyman, leaving the dis-\nparate Central Valley and Sierra constituents effectively voiceless in\ninfluencing their representative on matters of regional concern.\n(BLOWUP MAP OF AD 69)\nThe 69th district, currently wholly within Orange County, is represented\nby Assembly Democratic Caucus Chairman Kenneth Cory. Its peculiar\nshape, dubbed a \"Cory-Dor,\" is a clear effort to include every\nDemocrat\navailable/in at least a dozen cities in two counties.\n# # #\n-3-\nPB\n3\nW\nI\nX\nLt\n2\n(6L\nO\nAssembly Districts\n82\nA\n74\n92\nASSEMBLY BILL NO. I2\n08\nR\n75\nArea Map\nSee L.A.\nZ\n09\n19\nEL\n34\n0\n9\n62\n9\n9.E\nN\nA\nE\n28\n29\nEE\n12\n34\n9\nof\n23\n£\n33\n01\n3\n02\n22\n£1\nSee S.F. Bay Map\nN\n21\n01\n9\n6\n£\n+\nto\n2\n110\nN\nO\n9\n3\nB\n0\nZ\n5\nVALLEJO SOLAND\nSAN RAFAEL\nRICHMOND\nMARIN\n17\nBERKELE\n17\nTRA\n18\nDAKLAND\nSANEVRANCE\nSAN FRANCISCO\n20\n10\nALAMEDA\nPACIFICA\nSAN LEANDRO\n15\n14\nBURDINGAME\nSAM\nMATEO\nFREMONT\nREDWOOD\n3\nCITY\n26\nSAN MATEO\nPALO\nALTO\n23\n-\nLOS ALTOS\nASSEMBLY BILL NO 12\nMr.\nAssembly Districts\n24\nMM\nSAN JOSE\nSANTA\n22\n25\nSARATOGA\n10\nSAN FRANCISCO BAY\n1:62,500\nTo\nLine\ns\nZ\nSouth Dig\n&\n-\n& WA\n-\nA\n#\n18\nN\nN\nN\nA\n5\n-\nE\nD\nC\nO\nO\n20\nI\n19\nMA\n19\nA\ny\nC\nthe\nC\nSAN FRANCISCO\nBAY\nA\nMcLAREN\nSouth Beste\nNAVAL SHIPYARD\n18\nP\n0\n****\nOLYMPIC\nCOUNTRY\n5\nCLUB\nBase\nMap\nfurnished\nas\nby\nthe\nASSEMBLY BILL NO 12\nSAN FRANCISCO COUNTY\nthe\nconsent\nSTOCKTON\nMONO\nLAKE\nOSEMITE\nTIONAL\nClass Min.\nOAKDALE\nPARK\nLAKE CROWLEY\nSTATES\nSTANIAL\nMERCED\n37\nThumk\nGILROY\nCertinal\nStriped Min\nMADERA\nNATIONAL\nPARK\nBlack\nMth\nGould\nTULANE\nVALLEY\nGROVE\n2\nSEQUOIA MI\nWhitney\n31\nNATIONAL\nPARK\nASSEMBLY BILL NO 12\n-\nto\n=\nAssembly District 31\nING CITY\nBase Map material furnished as a public service by the\nNational Automobile Club Copyright Owner. Reproduction\nof this map is prohibited without consent of the copyright\nBeld MI\nowner.\n/\nINDIAN\nROBLES\nRute'Pk\n10\nMakland\nBase Map material furnished as public service by the\nCalifornia State Automobile Association Copyright Owner\nReproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of\nthe copyright owner.\n10\nASSEMBLY BILL NO. 12\nAssembly District 10\nTELER\nISLAND\nSTATEM\nISLAND\nREK\nSAN\nVENICE\nBLANCE\nTelephone\nMANDEVALLE\nSEAND\nTHAT\nTRACT\n12\nISLAND\nPALM\nTHEY\nindian\nConst\nI\nTRACT\n-\n*\nISLAND\nind\ncomer\nFabian\n30\n12\nSALIDA\nN\nAQUEDUCT\n(AAA)\nHETCHY\nNETCH\nMODESTO\nMETCH\nHETCHY\nSpring\nAssembly Districts\nSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY\nASSEMBLY BILL NO 12\nBase Map material furnished as 1 public service by the\nCalifornia State Automobile Association Copyright Owner.\n-\nReproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of\nthe copyright owner.\n62\n62\n41\n64\n47\n42\n41\n43\n48\n&\n61\n147\n54\n58\n544\n60\n59\n56\n7\n48\nto\n45\n49\nB\nSUBTA\n40\nnon\nSANTA\n53\n?\n45\n51\n57\n63\nNUMBER\n50\n55\n65\n65\n55\n46\n38\n66\n67\nI\nISL\nand\n69\n44\n39\nASSEMBLY BILL NO 12\n68\n46\nLONG\nBEACH\nLOS ANGELES COUNTY\nAssembly Districts\n0\n:\n&\nof\n&\nNORWALK\nLA MIRADA\nAMERICAN\nBELLFLOWER\nFULLERTON\nLAKEWOOD\nANAHEIM\nCYPRESS\n9\nASSEMBLY BILL NO 12\nAssembly District 69\nORANGE\nGARDEN\nGROVE\nSANTA ANA\nFOUNTAIN\nO\n0\n-\nX\n3\nW\n68\nA\nOt\n88\nR\n98\nSEE LOS ANGELES MAP\nZ\n0\n0\n91.\n=\n24\nA\n&\n18.\n@\nSL\nsu\n&\n0\n21\na\n1\nSEE SAN FRANCISCO MAP\nN\nε\nS.B. 2\nSENATORIAL DISTRICTS\n110\nN\nO\n9\n3\nBE\nO\nSENATORIAL DISTRICTS\nS.B. 2\nSAN FRANCISCO BAY\n1901VHVS.\n21\nEl\nOITY\n01Vd\n9\nX119\n000M038\nINCLUDE\nBURLINGAME\n01\nPACIFICA\nЫ\nALAMEDA\n6\nNVS\n83W838\nL\nNVS\nVALLEIO\n>\nOCCIDENT\nSEBASTOPOL\nYOUNTVIL\nCASTLE\nMillsken\nFREESTONE\nTHE\nRrs\nBODEGA\nBODEGA\nBAY\nBODEGA\nT FORD\nWakes\nCALIENTE\nCOTATI\navril(s)\nSPRS\nNAPA\nRes\nVERANO\n2010\nSONOMA\nTWO\n201\nTEMELEC\nALLS\nDILLON\n25/116)\nPETALUMA\n32\nIBAY\n*VALLEJO\n10\nSOLAND\nCONTRA\nCOSTA\nx\nDRAKES\nSAN\nRAFAEL\nSB 2\nAVE\nSOBRANTE\nRICHMOND\nBriance\nCERRITO\nSENATORIAL\nLAFAYET\nServey\nDISTRICT 10\nEMERYVILLE\nProvide\nGolden\nBase Map material furnished as a public service by the\nLAND\nCalifornia State Automobile Association Copyright Owner.\nReproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of\nSAN\nALAMEDA\nthe copyright owner.\nFRANCISCO\nMerred\nFRANK\n10\nLegue\nSalada\nBURLINGAME\nANIDER\nE\nPEDRO\nSAN\nPilarcites\nMATEO\nLake\nMOSS\nRes\nELMONT\nGRANADA\nFiller Paint\nSAN CARLOS\nREDWOOD CITY\n25\n3\nMOON BAY\nMENLO\nSEE\nMAP\nFOR\nNORTHERN\nPART\nOF\nOUNTY\n23\n-\n21\nCOUNTY\nVENTURA\n9\n25\n20\n28\n32\n30\nFires\nCOUNTY\nKERN\nCOUNTY\n33\nS.B. 2\n-\nSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY\nSenatorial Districts\n37\nLA County\nIn\nNORTHERN PART OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY -\nRIVER\nMin\nSanta Paula\nSANTA\nANGELES\nSUSANA\nMOUNTAINS\n***\nNorthridge\nCanvany\nCrescente\nOxnard\n2\nCanada\nNorth\nML\nBurbank\nAltadena\nSierra\nM\n(e)\nGlendale 1181 Pasadena\nNS\nHollywood\nRes.\nAlhambra\nBeverly\nMonterey\nPark\nAngeles\nCity\nLos\nAngeles\nHuntington\nPark\nPACIFIC\nSouth\nGate\nOCEAN\nLawndale\nCompton\nNorwalk\nSENATE BILL NO. 2\nTorrance\nSenate District 25\nBase Map material furnished as a public service by the\nAutomobile Club of Southern California Copyright Owner.\nReproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of\nthe copyright owner.\nEL 1006\nis\nHILLROSE\nST.\n1\nALL\nMISSION\nBIR PARK\nBLVD\nFOREST\nHILLS\nHB\nSUNLAND\nANGELES\nSRAPK\nFOREST STA\nCOUNSE\nSTONEHURST\nEL 1420\nST\nART ST.\n1714\nBLVD\nseco\nSUNI\nANANDA\nAlroyo\nMT DISAPPOINTMENT\nPLUMME\nBELLA\nTUJUNGA\nEL 5994\nS1\n5)\nSAN CABRIEL PK\nBROWN CANYON\n6156\n1730\nBARRIER DAM\nBROWN MTN\n5752\nST\nHIGHWAY HIGHLANDS\nBARY\nMT MARXHAM\nEL 765\nST.\nLA\nTUNA\nCANYON\nSEPULVEDA\n8\nEL 1513\nCRESCENTA\nNATIONAL\nVERDUGO\nCANYADA\nCREST\n3/26\nSB 2\nVERDUGO CITY\nAV\nCANADA\nANGELES\nCOUNTRY\nEL 1257\nAK\nEL 131.5\nVERQUGO.BL\nLA CANADA\nRNSWORTH\nMONTROSE\nFLINTR\nOAKMONT\na 1224\nCLUB\nSENATORIAL DISTRICT 27\nBENESHIRE\nALTADENA\nBRAND\nPARK\nAND\nBANK\ncouse\nNEW\nMAGNOLIA\nDRIVE\nNIN\nKENNETH\nVERDUGO\n8\nPARK\nBLVD\nIA\nCASA VERDUGO\nMOUNT\nGLENDALE\nBLUID\nBase Map material furnished as a public service by the\nALAMEDA\nBLVD.\nFLINT\nVerdugo\nVENTURA\nCHASE\nGROVE\nBL\nCalifornia State Automobile Association Copyright Owner.\nGLENOAKS\nPASA\nENA\nEL\n861\nReproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of\n=\nthe copyright owner,\nHOLLYWOOD\ncity\nHILLS\nVENGA\n821\nGLEND\nBLVD\nEn\nTOURNAMENT PARK\nIULHOLLAND\nDRIVE\nL A FIRE DEPT\nPAIRE No.2\nPATROL\nBE\nN\nC\nLake\n11.567\n0\nDRIVE\nHollywood\nSAN MARINO\nUpper Res,\nDRIVE\n101\nStone\nPILCATRE\nSOUTH\n80\nHOLLYWOOD\nMONTEREY\nCanyon\nRes.\nCANYON\nBOWL\nLOS FELIZ\nMEMBER\nPASADENA\nROSES RD\nLOOKOUT HTN\nEL\nEL 550\na\nHOLLY\nAPROYD SECO\nFranklin\nCOLDWATER\nWEST\nALHAMBRA\nCangon\nHOLLYWOOD\nRrs\n405\nBLVD\nSANTA\nMONTEREY\nIVEST L AL RANGE\nSUNSET\nPOPU\nPO\nHAMBRA\nALMANSOR\nDR\nHUNT\nCOLLEGE\nBELAIR\nMELROSE\nCOUNTRY CLUB\nBEVERLY\nBLVD\nHILLS\nVIN\nAONTS\n268)\nBEVERLY\n#\nAV\nBLVD\nVALLEY\n3RV\nBROADWAY\nBEYO\nANGELES\nAUDITORY\nSAY\nLOS ANGELES\nBURTON\nFAIRFAX\nNORMANDIE\nST\n1011\nLINCOLI\nEASTERN\n10,\nWESTWOO\nMANCOCK PARE\nVILLAGE\nBLVD\nWILTON\nGARFIELD\nCENTURY\nWILSHIRE\nLittlett\nBLVD\nVALLEY\nGARVEY\nCITY\nBLVD\nBLVD.\n8TH\nST.\nMONTEREY\nVEICHANS\nSAN\nPARK\nBRENTWOOD\nCIENEGA\nOLYMPIC\nEL.380\nORRHANAGE\nCOUNTRY\nBLVQ\nPICO\nSINEWORK\nGarvey Res.\nPICO\nBARCHD\nVENICE\nWEST\nCOURSE\nROSEDALE CEM\nBLUD\nBROOKLYN\nAVE EAST LA\nGRANDE\nLOS ANGELES\n7 TM\nMINTER\n12380\nPOMONA\na.vo.\nBLVD\nAVE\nPOMONA\nBLVD\nIIVO\nBLVD\nSANTA\nMONTEBELLO\nCOURSE\n2:\nLOS.\nBLVD\nEAST\nYEAR\nLOS ANGELE\nto\nBLVD\n320\nBLVD\nLINCO\nBLVD\nBLVD\nANGELES\nOLYMPIC\n72\n26 TH'S\nUNICA\nPACK\nCONTEBELLO\nAVE\nVISTA\nEL.93\n41ST\nST\nr\nWESHINGTON\nST\nFIELD\nVERNON\nSTUDIO\nVERNON\nAVE\nVENICE\nVERNON\nAVE\nMONTEBELLO\n3ATH\nARLINGTON\nEL 205\nWESTERN\nVERMONT\nALAMEDA\nLEONS\nDISTRICT\nST\nDATE\nCOMMERCE\nVE\nCEMETERY\nFRUITLAND\nE\nMAYWOOD\nLADERS\nAVE\nSLAUSON\nAV\nAVE\n2\n1\n4\n5-11,14,17\n15\n18\n16\n12\n36\n33\n13\n38\n27\nCongressional Districts\n39\n43\nAssembly Bill 16\n42\n40\nOF\nMEXICO\n41\nZ\nVALLEJO\n4\nSAN RAFAEL\nM\nGo\nRICHMOND\n14\nBERKELEY\nCONTRA ONTRA COSTA\nOAKLAND\nSAN\n6\nin\nFRANCISCO\nALAMEDA\n8\nSAN LEANDRO\n//\nPACIFICA\nBURLINGAME\nS\nCISAN MATEO\nMATER\nREDWOOD\nFREMONT\nCITY\n17\nPALO\nALTO\n4\nI\nLOS ALTOS\nc.\nCLARA\nSAN JOSE\nCongressional Districts\nSARATOGA\nAssembly Bill 16\n10\n4)\nSAN FRANCISCO BAY\nX\n1:62,500\nADMINTS\nRockaway Beach\nDist\nMillbrae\nBRIDGE\n92\nWHIPPLE\nVALLECITOS\nDecoto\nVALLE\nLinda Mar\nPt.\nMATEO\nDist.\nDist\nAlvarado*\nSunot\nFARK\nFRIWY.\nSANCHEZ\nDist.\nNILES\nScotts Corner\nHillst\nan\nNiles\n/\n18\nFoster City\nSTATE\nCenterville\nDist.\nBLVD\nMontara\nFremont\nIrvington\nr/sh,\nTHORNTON\nMISSION\nrost\nMission\nBelmont\nNewark\nSan Jose\nDist.\ncenton\nEl Granada\nAND\nCarlos\nRedwood City\nWarm Springs\nSix\nDist.\nALAMEDA\nSANTA\nCLARA\nGAME\nMook Biol\nREFUSE\n*3\nCoyote-\nMoolo\nPark\nPalo Alto\nwill\n34\nATG\nVollege\nFELTER\nBLACK WIN.\n-\nMilpitas\nDAY\n1459\nCARIBREAN\nSIERRA\nADNEWS\nAgnew\nPerjoja\nabites\nValuey\nHills\nSuring\nof\nvale\nCharge Santa Clara\nFOOT\nCOPERNICUS\nMILLS\ninc.\n35\nTHE\nJose\n$45\nX4\nW:\nSTEVENS\nblik\nGraping\nPermanente\nEstimida\nCupertino\nSmith Creek\n/\nE\nPROSPECT 2\nCampbell\nSTEVENS\nNEMORAL\nCREEK\nPARK\nloos Min-\n2634\nCAPITOL\nFRONTIER\nMATOLA\nSARATOGA\n13\nPercidero\n-\nPOLLARD\nBUTAND\nSTATE\nSaratoga\nBLOSSOM\nComb\nthe\nYOREST\nMonte\nSereno\nMILL\nC10\nHERESA\nCASTLE\nMETCALE\n2507\nMT.\nPLEASANT\nLos Gatos\nCoyote\n1.1\nMATER\nand\nSTATES\nPOREST\nTERESA\nFREE\nBIG\n8\nBASIN\nCONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 17\nREDWOODS\nBig\nSTATE, ,PARK\nBasin\nASSEMBLY BILL 16\nROCK\nMadrone\nBase Map material furnished as a public service by the\nMorgan\nBc\nCalifornia State Automobile Association Copyright Owner.\nHill\n/\nBrookdales\nReproduction of this map is prohibited without consent of\nthe copyright owner.\n12\nBen\n15,\nLomond\nUVAS\n(1.344\nCOUNTY\nSwanton\n-\nFOREST OF\nMeachan\n(CR)\nSEE INSET MAP FOR NORTHERN PART OF COUNTY\n24\n22\n27\nCOUNTY\n20\n26\n33\n29\n28\n30\n25\n38\nNATA\n37\n&\n19\n35\n21\nFirms\n23\nCOUNTY\nPRELIMINARY\nCOUNTY\n31\nCOUNTY OF LOS ANGELES\n0\nSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY\nCongressional Districts\n34\n35\nAssembly Bill 16\n-\n24\n32\n=\nby\nNORTHERN PART OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1\n25\nLOS ANGELES\nCOUNTY\nSAN\nto\nLaHabra\nBERNARDINO\nFlood Cantrol\nCOUNTY\nBasin\nNorwalk\norba Linds\nParamount\nFuller\n/Buena\nCorona\nArtesia\nLakewood\nLAKE\nMATHEWS\n1\nAnaheim\n*\n-\nGarden\nLAND.\n34\nGrove\nRossmoor\nU.S.MAYAL\nLong\nMidway\nBeach\nSTATION\nSanta\nPEDRO\nBAY\nAna\n39\nSunset Beach\n32\nNATIONAL\nElsinore\nLAKE\nHuntington\nBeach\nCosta\n-\nMesa\nWHY\nNewport Beach\nCorona\nBalbon\ndel Mar\n42\nin\nFOREST\nBase Map meterial furnished as public service by the\nAutomobile Club Southern Catifornia Copyright Owner.\nReproduction this map is prohibited without consent of\nthe copyright owner.\nLaguna Beach\nSAN DIEGO\nC.O\nSouth Laguna\nORANGE COUNTY\nASSEMBLY BILL NO. 16\nSan Clemente\n42\nCAMP\nJOSEPH\nPENDLETON\n(USMC)\nCongressional Districts\nN\nFallbrox\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nMEMO TO THE PRESS\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n12-30-71\n#731\nFollowing are the texts of the Assembly, Senate and Congressional\nreapportionment bills vetoed by Governor Reagan:\nAB 16 - Waxman\n\"This bill is defective in achieving equality of\nrepresentation in two ways, (1) the failure to achieve substantial\nequality of population in every instance, and (2) the denial of effec-\ntive equal representation for all voters due to the shapes of a number\nof the districts.\nInequality of Population\nIn at least two districts (5 and 6) there has not been a good faith\neffort to achieve equality of population with the other districts in\nthe state. These two districts were left entirely within the boundaries\nof San Francisco and Marin Counties, with the result that each district\nhas a population of only some 461,000 persons, 3,000 short of the ideal\nsize of 464,026. (District 5 has 460,838; District 6 has 461,594).\nAs a result two other Northern California districts are left over-\npopulated, and under-represented by about the same number of persons.\n(District 3 with 467,743, and District 4 with 468,560)\nLack of Effective Representation for Every Voter\nThe congressional plan has shortcomings in several other areas, all of\nwhich tend to work to the disadvantage of a number of citizens in\nachieving effective equality of representation. Underlying the concept\nof 'one man - one vote' is the principle that all citizens should have\na voice in their government. That principle is vitiated when districts\nare drawn so that the members of a constituency have little in common\nor are confused by the vagaries of tortuously constructed lines.\nSome of these shortcomings are as follows:\nDifficulty of Access to All Parts of the District\nSome districts have unnecessary appendages attached that are not\neffectively contiguous to the rest of the district. An example is the\n36th district in Kings, Kern, and San Luis Obispo counties, which has a\nlong arm with almost no population in it, and no road from one end to\nthe other, reaching all the way down the coastline to Goleta and Isla\nVista in Santa Barbara County. The 43rd district includes a portion\nof San Diego County on the coastal side of the mountains that separates\nthese people unnecessarily from the bulk of the population in Riverside\nand Imperial counties. The 42nd district has the bulk of its population\nin central San Diego County, but includes voters as far up the coast\n#731\nas Newport Beach. In my view, to the extent possible, every part of a\ndistrict should be directly accessible to the rest of the district, to\nfacilitate ease of communication, to provide access to elected public\nrepresentatives and to achieve effective equal representation.\nLack of Geographical Compactness\nSeveral districts are not as reasonably compact as they might be. The\n28th district extends in a narrow strip along virtually the entire\nwestern coast of Los Angeles County from Malibu to Palos Verdes. The\n36th, 42nd, and 43rd districts already mentioned are other examples.\nThe 23rd and 34th districts both wind tortuously through Los Angeles\nand Orange counties, and the 37th through central Los Angeles, for\nobvious partisan purposes unrelated to effective representation. Dis-\ntricts should be at least reasonably compact to facilitate ease of com-\nmunication between voter and representative.\nDivision of Communities of Interest\nThere is a random disregard for preservation of communities of interest\nin this bill, with many communities arbitrarily divided---sometimes\nsolely for political purposes. The 17th district in Santa Clara County\nincludes a narrow corridor dividing downtown San Jose, and picking up\na predominately Mexican-American community on the east side, removed\nfrom the bulk of the population on the west side of Santa Clara and\nSan Mateo counties. The 35th district arbitrarily takes a portion of\ndowntown Long Beach out of the 32nd District. The cities of San\nBernardino, Pomona, and Riverside are all split by the 38th district\nfor partisan advantage. Two adjacent Alameda County districts, the 7th\nand 8th, arbitrarily pick up areas of Contra Costa County. Effective\nrepresentation should dictate that local political boundaries and com-\nmunities of interest be kept intact as much as possible to avoid\nunnecessarily confusing voters with respect to whom his representative\nmay be.\nThe apportionment of California's seats in the House of Representatives\nwill have an extremely important impact on the nature and quality of\nCalifornia's representation as a state in the federal system for at\nleast a decade to come.\nThe many deficiencies I have outlined show that a far better job of\nCongressional reapportionment should have been done. These factors,\ntaken cumulatively, should leave no doubt in the mind of anyone truly\nseeking a fair plan of Congressional apportionment that this legislation\nis unacceptable and certainly not in the best interests of the people\nof California.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the governor said.\nAB 12 NP Waxman\n\"This bill is defective in at least six major ways.\nFirst, it appears that there are several districts that deviate sub-\nstantially from equality of population. This problem is exacerbated by\nthe way in which census unit boundaries have been ignored in construct-\ning some districts. Instead of census units, precincts have been used\nin several cases as building blocks. It is well established, of course,\nthat districts must be created on the basis of population, not on the\n-2-\n#731\nbasis of the number of registered voters in precinct. The mixture of\nthe use of precinct lines, and census boundaries, is inappropriate for\nthe purposes of reapportionment and, in addition, makes it impossible\nto perform an efficient verification of population totals.\nAnother associated flaw is the fact that there is at least one instance\nin the bill in which the same voters are included in more than one\ndistrict.\nA second major flaw is the failure to give due attention to compactness\nas a standard for establishing the new districts. Compactness is one\nof the chief requirements of a rational reapportionment policy, for\ncompact districts create constituencies that are more easily and\neffectively represented, that allow the people more direct access to\ntheir assemblymen, and that lighten the task of conducting elections.\nThe sole reason for the failure to establish compact districts in this\nbill appears to have been the attempt of the majority party to obtain\npartisan advantage. Examples of this flaw in the bill include the 10th\nAssembly District which stretches from Concord to Stockton, south\n150 miles to the southernmost tip of Santa Clara County, and thence\nnorthward into the City of San Jose, and the 2nd, the 31st, the 16th,\nthe 29th, 65th, and the 69th Assembly Districts. I strongly believe\nthat in a rational plan the new districts should be at least as compact\nas those in the present law, and that every effort should be made to\nimprove on existing standards of compactness.\nA third flaw is the failure to establish districts that reflect the\nways in which the people of the state actually interact and communicate.\nDistricts should be established in such a way as to allow the people to\ncommunicate easily with their representatives and to allow representa-\ntives to travel without difficulty from one part of the district to\nanother. In this bill, however, districts are created that are cut by\nmountain ranges and other natural obstacles and that join very different\nareas by narrow corridors of unpopulated territory. In some districts\nthere are even no reasonable routes of highway travel between one part\nof the district and another. Again, there is no rational purpose for\nthe creation of such districts, but simply an effort to make partisan\ngains. Only political motivation explains the lines of the 4th and 29th\ndistricts. The 4th Assembly District, traditionally a northern central\nvalley district, is needlessly extended westward over the coastal\nmountains to include a portion of the City of Santa Rosa, whose\n-3-\n#731\nresidents have negligible commonality with the central valley citizens\nwho would undoubtedly dominate the selection of this district's repre-\nsentative. In the proposed 29th district, I fail to see even the most\nremote relationship between the interests of rural San Luis Obispo\nCounty and southeastern Ventura County. What access to his representa-\ntive would a resident of either end of this district have, in the event\nthe representative is elected from the opposite end, hundreds of miles\naway? In addition, the 31st district, which would stretch from Santa\nCruz to the High Sierra, is totally indefensible, and an insult to the\nvery concept of participatory representation. Its effect upon its\nproposed constituents would be to deny numerous communities any effec-\ntive access to their representative, no matter how able he might be.\nI believe that a rational redistricting plan would provide for districts\nthat avoid these problems and give both the people and their represent-\natives unrestricted opportunities for communication and access.\nA fourth flaw in the bill is the blatant failure to pay due respect to\nthe needs and interests of the different communities and political\ndivisions in the state. The districts provided for in this bill cut\nacross county and city lines, fragment the established political\ndivisions of the state, and violate the identity of innumerable\ncommunities. Again, the sole purpose seems to have been to achieve\npartisan gains. Thus, Stockton is divided among four districts and\nSanta Clara County is given similarly irrational treatment. The\nsouthern boundary of the 2nd Assembly District divides virtually every\ncommunity of any size, throwing some citizens of each community into a\npredominantly rural, north coast district, and others of the same com-\nmunities into the 7th District, whose interests are distinctly of a\nmetropolitan Bay Area nature. A rational apportionment of assembly\ndistricts requires an effort to preserve the political identities of\nthe cities and other political divisions of the state and to establish\ndistricts that add to rather than diminish that sense of community\nwhich is one of the prime bases of our system of representative\ngovernment.\nA fifth flaw in the bill is the apparent use of minority group popula-\ntion data to construct districts that will remain safe for white incum-\nbent Democrats through the decade of the 1970s. Reapportionment should\nbe conducted with an eye blind to color and race. But, in many areas,\nthis bill reflects what can only be a deliberate effort to establish\ndistricts that will not permit the election of minority representatives.\nThis is the only explanation of the fragmentation of the Mexican-American\ncommunities in Los Angeles and of lines drawn for the 45th, 51st and\n65th Assembly Districts.\nThe collapse and reappearance of the 57th District merits special\nattention. First, there is clearly no population pressure justification\nfor this change, inasmuch as the district reappears just a few miles\naway from its current location. Second, once the decision is made to\ncreate a new, non-incumbent district in Los Angeles, to place it in such\na location as to ensure the election of an Anglo at a time when respons-\nible, yet long-under-represented minorities are struggling to find ways\nto work within our political system, is astounding and completely\nindefensible. I am sure the great majority of Californians of all\nraces will agree.\nApportionment cannot be biased by an effort to keep incumbents of one\nrace in power, and the new districts should be established in such a\nway that all the people of California are fairly and equally represented.\nA sixth flaw in the bill is the failure to create districts that reflect\nthe shifts in population that have occurred in the state since the 1960\ncensus. The data that was made available many months ago by the Bureau\nof the Census reveals very clearly that some counties have dramatically\nincreased in population. In several cases, these counties deserve\nadditional new seats and the counties that lost in relative population\nshould lose seats. In this bill, however, deliberate efforts appear to\nhave been made to resist the impact of these shifts in population.\nAgain, the motive appears to be simply that of partisan advantage.\nObvious examples of this flaw in the bill include Alameda County.\nIndeed, the manner in which this bill proposes to draw Assembly districts\nin Alameda County is responsible for many of the principal failures of\nthis legislation throughout the state. Assembly districts 14, 15, 16\n-4-\n#731\nand 17, as now composed, contain insufficient population for three\ndistricts under the court's requirement of equality. The way in which\nthese districts were drawn clearly necessitated many of the misshapen\ndistricts and divided communities throughout the balance of the state.\nThus, the County of Contra Costa, with a population entitlement of more\nthan two full Assembly Districts, is fragmented amongst four districts,\nwith total disregard for longstanding economic, social, and regional\nand local governmental communities---all in a clear effort to preserve\nthe incumbents in four deficient Alameda districts. Similarly, the\nCounty of San Joaquin, and specifically the City of Stockton, are\ndivided among four districts, when the county's population entitles it\nto 1.16 Assembly districts. It is clear that, at a minimum, the rep-\nresentatives elected from both the 9th and 10th districts could never\nbe expected to reside in or properly represent the citizens and legit-\nimate interests of San Joaquin County.\nPerhaps no one of these flaws alone would decisively debilitate this\nplan, but taken together they point to an effort to subvert the repre-\nsentative process for partisan advantage. Nowhere does this bill more\nrichly deserve the label of blatant, partisan gerrymander than in the\nCity and County of Fresno. The tortuous changes, inserted at the last\nminute before passage, of the lines of the 32nd and 33rd districts may\nor may not enhance the prospects of the election of a Mexican-American\nfrom the 32nd district, though the bulk of evidence suggests such a\ncontention is a cruel hoax. Clearly, however, there was no motivation\nsave sheer heavy-handed partisan gain behind the decision to include the\nincumbents from the two districts within the proposed new boundaries of\nthe 33rd district.\nOther flaws in the bill could be cited, but the evidence is overwhelming\nthat a good faith effort has been lacking to develop a plan for Assembly\ndistricting that is rational and fair. This bill serves only a narrow\npartisan purpose. As was publicly admitted, it is a plan to maintain\nand strengthen a Democratic majority in the Assembly. That majority\nwon power in 1970 with barely 50 percent of the two party vote, but\nnow seeks to establish districts so heavily biased in favor of Democratic\ncandidates that it is unlikely that Republicans could win more than 31\nor 32 districts in the 1972 elections, even if Republican candidates\nagain secured 49 or 50 percent of the two-party vote. The whole\nnature of the Democratic process depends on effective competition be-\ntween the candidates of different parties, but this bill would seek to\neliminate competition from all but a handful of seats now held by\nRepublican incumbents. In effect, as a result of the efforts to meet\nthe single goal of partisan gain, all the standards that should go into\nthe elaboration of a rational state policy on Assembly reapportionment\nhave been jettisoned.\nI cast this veto with the deepest disappointment. I had thought that\nthe lengthy legislative deliberations of the past year would have pro-\nduced an Assembly apportionment that was fair and equitable. However,\nI have been presented with a bill which violates every major standard\nthat should inform a rational state policy on reapportionment and\nwhich, in a very real sense, jeopardizes the whole future of repre-\nsentative government in this state.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the governor said.\nSB 2 - Dymally\n\"The reapportionment of our state Senate districts,\nwhich this bill would mandate, is replete with\nmisshapen and oddly drawn lines which not only stretch the imagination,\nbut which in many cases, stretch beyond the point of reason.\nFor example, the 15th District follows the California-Nevada border on\nthe East from Riverside County northward to above Bridgeport and stretches\nacross a narrow corridor of the San Joaquin Valley westward to Monterey\non the North and Arroyo Grande on the South. The ludicrousness of the\ndistrict's boundaries totally ignores the principle of compactness---\nwhich should be fundamental to the drawing of boundaries around any\nvoting district. The virtually non-contiguous parts of the district\nmake effective communication and access within the district unlikely\nand effective representation unnecessarily difficult.\n-5-\n#731\nAnother flaw in the bill is that the San Mateo portion of the 10th\nDistrict is only technically connected to the San Francisco and Marin\nportions of the district across the waters of San Francisco Bay where\nthe county boundaries meet. The district was composed by hopping from\nship to ship along the eastern half of San Francisco in order to gain\naccess into San Mateo County. Four of these ships had no population\nwhen the census was taken and the ships could move to another location\nat any time. The fact that this ridiculous approach was used to justify\ngerrymandering of the district once again disregards the principle of\ncompactness.\nAnother area of deep concern is Alameda County where districts 8 and 11\nconstitute the only multi-member districts in the state. This means\nthat voters in Alameda County would be in a single district represented\nby two Senators with twice the population of an ordinary district.\nRegrettably, it will have the effect of depriving racial minorities in\nthe district of the full weight of their voting strength, due to com-\nbining the districts and making them twice as large as they otherwise\nwould be.\nFinally, the problem of artifically splintering communities of interest\nby dividing representation of cities and counties among Senate districts\nis of grave concern, not only to me, but also to citizens and local\nofficials of many jurisdictions around the state. The problem is\nespecially acute in Los Angeles where 40 incorporated cities have been\nsplit. For example, the City of Encino, with a population of 41, 579,\nwould be represented by four Senatorial districts (the 19th, the 22nd,\nthe 23rd, and the 25th). Orange County would be split into six sena-\ntorial districts (the 26th, the 34th, the 35th, the 36th, the 37th,\nand the 38th). I realize, of course, that under the 'one man-one vote'\ndoctrine, it is inevitable that some cities and counties will be\ndivided. However, if local government is to survive, it is imperative\nthat such divisions be kept to a minimum.\nThis bill fails miserably in this regard, and in sum, falls far short\nof those standards of fair and effective representation the people of\nCalifornia have a right to expect from a reapportionment measure of\nthis consequence and magnitude.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\" the governor said.\n# # #\n-6-\nPB\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nMEMO TO THE PRESS\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n12-30-71\nGovernor Reagan will attend a Rose Bowl\nKick-Off Luncheon at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium,\n300 East Green Street, Pasadena at noon Friday,\nDecember 31 and attend the Rose Bowl Game on\nSaturday, January 1.\n# # #\nPB\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n12-30-71\n#732\nGovernor Ronald Reagan announced today the following bills have\nbeen vetoed:\nAB 578 - Ryan\nIncreases the special registration fee for\nsnowmobiles by one dollar, and establishes noise\nlimits for snowmobiles.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"I already have signed legislation during this\nsession which addresses itself to problems relating\nto the operation of off-road vehicles, including\nsnowmobiles.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,'\nthe governor said.\nAB 1229 - Waxman\nRequires that an absentee ballot be sent with the\nballot pamphlet. The bill changes the deadline for\nthe receipt of absentee ballots by the clerk from\n5:00 p.m. on the day before the day of election\nto the time for the closing of the polls on election\nday. Permits absentee ballots to be counted if\nreceived by the precinct board of the absent voter's\nregular polling place prior to the close of the polls\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"Rxisting law does not preclude local government from\nissluding applications for absentee ballots in\nsample ballots. In fact, many of California's larger\ncounties (including San Francisco, San Diego,\nAlameda, Orange and Los Angeles) now include this\ntype of information with sample ballots. I can find\nno justification to mandate on local government the\nadditional burden of including this material in over\n8 million sample ballots, when absentee voters\nconsist of less than 5 percent of the total votes\ncast.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,'\nthe governor said.\nAB 1474 Ralph\nRequires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to\nselect six school districts with an average daily\nattendance of 5,000 or more for a pilot project to\nprovide for the establishment and operation of one\nschool-community council for one school within each\ndistrict. The bill authorizes the governing boards\nof school districts so selected to establish\nadditional school-community councils for other\nschools in the district.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The need for meaningful parent participation in the\neducational process is not at issue. However, this\nbill imposes an organizational structure on school\ndistricts without taking into consideration the\nwishes of parents or local school officials. For\nthe state to interfere in local school affairs in\nthis way would be inappropriate and contrary to this\nadministration's policy of local control of schools.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2050 - Ralph\nProvides that the Superintendent of Public Instruction\nshall establish standards for qualification of\nchildren's centers as instruction laboratories for\nthose children receiving day care services, and\non-the-job training facilities for community college\nstudents, subject to approval by the State College\nTrustees and the Board of Governors of the California\nCommunity Colleges.\n- 1 -\n#732\nAB 2050 - Ralph (Cont'd.)\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"Approval of this measure would re-establish\nlaboratory classrooms on these college campuses,\neven though the legislature chose to remove from\nlast year's budget funding for similar undertakings\nat four state colleges.\n\"These instructional laboratories are, and should be,\nprimarily research-oriented. I believe research is\nproperly a function of the University of California,\nThe legislative analyst has indicated that the type\nand amount of research which has resulted from\nlaboratory schools operated by the University has\ngreatly exceeded that of parallel programs previously\nrun by the state colleges.\n\"In view of the University's accomplishments in this\nfield, and in line with the policy of this\nadministration that state-supported educational\nresearch functions should be reserved to the\nUniversity, I do not believe it would be appropriate\nfor the state to mandate new functions of this type\non our already hard-pressed local school districts.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\n3089\nAB\n2089 - Chappie\nRequires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to\napportion the high school foundation program amount\nof $488 per average daily attendance for all\nopportunity schools and classes and all continuation\nschools and classes maintained by the county\nsuperintendent of schools.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"This measure would proliferate the direct services\nbeing performed by county superintendents of schools.\nIn 1971, both the Governor's Commission on Education\nReform and the legislative analyst recommended that\ndirect services of county superintendents such as\nresponsibility for classroom teaching be reduced or\neliminated and that the county superintendent of\neducation's role be re-oriented toward such functions\nas centralized services, instructional guidance and\ncurricula development. In this regard, I am in full\nagreement with the conclusions of the Commission on\nEducation Reform and the legislative analyst.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2554 - Lewis\nMakes several clarifying amendments\nto provisions relating to child care\neducation. The bill specifically requires the State\nDepartment of Social Welfare to adopt regulations\nwhich maximize federal financial participation. It\nprescribes that services are to be provided to persons\nclassed as former and potential recipients under a\ndefinition which includes, but is not limited to, all\ngroups enumerated in federal regulations. The bill\nalso requires that all child care programs involving\nthe expenditure of federal funds, including those\nauthorized by the Welfare Reform Act of 1971, to be\ncarried out under terms specified in the Social\nWelfare/Education contract.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"The bill places the state in a position of having to\nmandate child care welfare services for large numbers\nof people who are not now welfare recipients and could\nnot qualify to receive welfare grants. The\nunrestricted definition would constitute a blank\ncheck whereby the federal government could pressure\nthe state into allocating unlimited resources in\norder to meet this commitment.\n- 2 -\n#732\nAB 2554 - Lewis (Cont'd\nREASON FOR VETO (Cont 'd.)\n\"The Welfare Reform Act of 1971 provided funds for\nchild care services and to that extent mandated child\ncare services to a defined group of former and\npotential welfare recipients. The approach\nauthorized by the Welfare Reform Act provides the\nflexibility needed to determine how child care\nservices can best be provided to meet local needs.\nThis approach should be adequately tested before\ncommitting taxpayers to fund the unlimited kind of\nservices this bill would force on them.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nAB 2578 - Waxman\nEstablishes the Secretary of State as the Chief\nElections Officer and requires that he insure the\nlaws pertaining to elections are uniformly and\nadequately observed. He is also given the power\nto prescribe the format and content of reports from\nlocal election officials as he deems advisable.\nThe bill also repeals certain mandatory deadlines\nfor county clerks to file voter registration\ninformation and allows the Secretary of State to\nestablish new deadlines. He will also control\ndissemination of this information.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"Existing law already provides the Secretary of State\nwith a method of obtaining statistical information\non voter registration and election results. Further,\nto repeal mandatory deadlines for county clerks to\nfile voter registration information and to permit\nreporting dates to be changed on an election-by-\nelection basis can only result in needless confusion\nand unnecessary delays in reporting by local county\nclerks.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nSB 3 - Alquist\nProvides that candidates on the ballot will be those\nfound by Secretary of State to be recognized\ncandidates throughout the nation or California for\noffice of President of United States if they have\nproperly formed a delegation no later than the 74th\nday before the primary. The bill permits any such\ncandidate to withdraw by filing no later than the\n74th day before the primary an affidavit that he is\nnot candidate.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"This bill delegates to one elected official, the\nSecretary of State, the authority and responsibility\nfor determining who is a generally recognized\ncandidate for his party's nomination for the\npresidency, at least for purposes of gaining a place\non the ballot. I believe that this determination\nshould be made by the voters of each party, as it is\nnow, through the requirement that supporters of each\ncandidate gather a reasonable number of signatures\nof registered voters.\n\"If a candidate is, indeed, generally recognized as to:\nserious presidential contender, his supporters should have no difficulty\nin gathering sufficient signatures to place his name on the California\nballot. If, on the other hand, they are unable to gather sufficient\nsignatures, that, in itself, would indicate a lack or broad-based appeal.\nCalifornia's election system already provides for direct citizen involve-\nment. The present system in California in no way handicaps serious\ncandidates who are seeking presidential office and, contrary to what its\nadvocates contend, this measure does not change existing law with respect\nto requiring a candidate to form a delegation.\n\"Accordingly. I am returning the bill unsigned,' the governor said.\n- 3 -\n#732\nSB 1256 - Beilenson\nProhibits the Department of Public Works from\ngranting or leasing to the City of Los Angeles, any\ninterest in the right-of-way of, including the use\nof areas above or below, Route 405 proposed by the\nLos Angeles Department of Airports, without the\napproval of the legislature.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"As the result of 1970 legislation, the state made\navailable for lease portions of state rights-of-way\nto local agencies for mass transit. That portion of\nthe 1970 legislation which specifically cited Route\n405 as one route to be studied for mass transit\nvehicles usage would be negated by SB 1256.\n\"As evidenced by the recent signing of Senate Bill\n325, this administration is dedicated to the concept\nof encouraging the development of balanced\ntransportation systems through decisions made at\nthe local level. The enactment of SB 1256 would\nseriously curtail Los Angeles' efforts to improve\nthe critical problem of access to the Los Angeles\nInternational Airport, and would interpose an\nadditional level of governmental decision making on\nthe usage of the right-of-way for this route.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\nSB 1391 - Way\nAuthorizes the committing court to suspend the\ncommitment of a person to the Director of Corrections\nfor placement in the California Rehabilitation\nCenter and place such person on probation under the\ncounty probation department when the court concludes\nsuch person is a fit subject for such suspension.\nThe bill establishes a formula to determine state\nsavings when such commitment is suspended and require\nthe state to reimburse counties at a rate of $4,000\nfor each numerical reduction in its annual commitment\nrate to be used by the counties for drug treatment\nand control programs. The bill also provides for a\ntermination date of December 31, 1975.\nREASON FOR VETO.\n\"Many questions have been raised regarding the\nprobation subsidy program. Since this new concept\nhas been in effect now for several years, it deserves\na serious evaluation. Accordingly, several studies\nare presently under way to determine its efficacy.\nIt would be premature, particularly in view of the\ncost inherent in this measure, to create a new\nsubsidy program before the results of the studies\nare known. The basic concepts contained in this\nmeasure could conceivably become part of a\ncomprehensive drug abuse treatment program if the\nstudies were to show that an expansion of probation\nsubsidy would be warranted.\n\"Furthermore, the estimated additional state cost of\n$1.2 to $1.9 million per year is prohibitive at this\ntime, This bill contemplates using savings at the\nstate level resulting from reductions in commitments\nto the California Rehabilitation Center. Based on\n1971-72 budget figures, the resulting savings per\ninmate are not sufficient to meet the $4,000 subsidy\nrate.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned, \"\nthe governor said.\n- 4 -\n#732\nSB 1400 - Way\nWould provide a procedure whereby the Madera County\nterritory of the State Center Community College\nDistrict could transfer to another community college\ndistrict.\nREASON FOR VETO:\n\"Recently approved legislation (Chapter 1100)\nprovides for an orderly process to transfer a portion\nof a community college district to another district.\nFurthermore, the Education Code already provides\nfor establishing new community college districts\nor for the changing of district boundaries.\n\"This measure, if approved, would circumvent\nexisting law, by permitting an exception to it,\nwhile bypassing the local community college board\nof trustees, the county committee on school district\norganization, and the Board of Governors of the\nCalifornia Community Colleges.\n\"Accordingly, I am returning the bill unsigned,\"\nthe governor said.\n#######\nEJG\n- 5 -\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nMEMO TO THE PRESS\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n12-30-71\n#733\nGOVERNOR'S SCHEDULE\nJanuary 3, 1971\nthrough\nJanuary 9, 1971\nMonday, January 3\nOffice Appointments\nOvernight - Sacramento\nTuesday, January 4\nOffice Appointments\nAfternoon\nDepart for Los Angeles\nOvernight - Los Angeles\nWednesday, January 5\n1:00 P.M.\nKCET Studios, 1313 North Vine Street - Taping\nof program with William F. Buckley\nAfternoon\nDepart for Sacramento\nOvernight - Sacramento\nThursday, January 6\n11:00 a.m.\nState of the State Message, Assembly Chambers\nOvernight - Sacramento\nFriday, January 7\nOffice Appointments\nOvernight - Los Angeles\nSaturday, January 8\nNo Appointments Scheduled\nOvernight - Los Angeles\nSunday, January 9\nNo Appointments Scheduled\nOvernight - Sacramento\n# # #\nPB"
}