Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
118564684
label
California State Office of Economic Opportunity - Evaluation Report 03/26/1971 (5 of 7)
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
118564684
contentType
document
title
California State Office of Economic Opportunity - Evaluation Report 03/26/1971 (5 of 7)
citationUrl
identifierLocal
840
collections
Ronald Reagan's Governor's Papers of the Press Unit
California Rural Legal Assistance (CRLA) Files
thumbnailUrl
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
118564684
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1975-12-31
year
1975
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1967-01-01
year
1967
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
d68adf8cdf1c9f31
ocrText
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
Digital Library Collections
This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections.
Collection: Reagan, Ronald: Gubernatorial Papers,
1966-74: Press Unit
Folder Title: California State Office of Economic Opportunity
- Evaluation Report 03/26/1971 (5 of 7)
Box: P27
To see more digitized collections visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library
To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection
Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected]
Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing
National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/
NAME
TITLE
AGENCY
ADDRESS (Business)
TELEPHONE #
ADDRESS (home)
TELEPHONE #
HOW LONG WITH AGENCY
WHEN APPOINTED
PRIOR TO APPOINTMENT
EVALUATOR
DATE
-2-
SEOO EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
INTRODUCTION
SECTION I
THE SEOO AND THE GOVERNOR
SECTION II
THE SE00 AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES
SECTION III
THE SE00 AND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES
SECTION IV
THE SEOO AND OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES
SECTION V
THE SE00 AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
SECTION VI
THE SE00 AND COMMUNITY GROUPS, PRIVATE
AGENCIES AND GENERAL PUBLIC
SECTION VII
THE SE00 AND THE OEO REGIONAL OFFICE
SECTION VIII
THE OEO REGIONAL OFFICE AND THE SEOO
SECTION IX
HEADQUARTERS/OEO AND THE SEOO
SECTION X
SEOO ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
SECTION XI
SEOO WORK PROGRAM - California
[Points not covered in earlier sections]
BLANK FORMS
-3-
SEOO EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
INTRODUCTION
A.
PURPOSE
This questionnaire is designed to collect data for later tabulation
and analysis. The collected data will include (1) judgements made
by the people being interviewed (not by the evaluator); (2) lists;
(3) detailed descriptions of significant items.
B.
POLICIES
1. Do not expect your answers to be treated confidentially. In
fact no confidential information is desired. Therefore,
your answers - many of which are your opinion - should be
what you could and would be willing to state publicly.
2. We want an evaluation which is fair, honest, and helpful.
Therefore, the questionnaire includes the questions being asked
of all groups.
3. The evaluator will be glad to show you what he has written
down at the conclusion of personal interviews.
4. You will be asked to review and initial the interviewers notes
in order to assure accuracy.
C. PARTS
The questionnaire is separated into different sections. Some people
will answer the questions in only one section, others in several
sections; some in all sections. The cover letter with this questionnaire
states which section you are to answer.
The groups of people who will be interviewed are:
(1) SEOO Director
(2) SEOO staff
(3) State agencies
(4) Federal, local government, private agencies
(5) CAAs and poverty groups
(6) OEO Regional Office staff
-4-
SEOO EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE (Continued)
The references which are noted refer to OEO Instruction 7501-1,
"The Role of State Economic Opportunity Offices", SEOO Form 81
and to the SEOO Work Program.
D. PROCEDURES
1. Read the question and circle the word in the rating colum which
you belive best states the judgement you would reach.
Answer either "Yes/No/Don't Know" or "Good/Poor/Don't Know"
depending on the question. You have to decide on one answer;
you may not qualify it into the "maybe" area.
2. When the question asks for a LIST of items:
(a) take a blank form (which we've called "LIST")
(b) write in the Section # and Question # in the box.
(c) fill out the filing information on the top of the form--
in case the page comes loose.
(a) fill in the listed items as briefly as possible.
3. When the question asks you to DESCRIBE items in more detail -
(a) take a blank form (which we've called "DESCRIPTION")
(b) write in the Section # and Question #, in the box.
(c) fill out the filing information.
(d) write in the details briefly. Don't worry if the standard
format of the blank form doesn't really fit what you want
to write.
4. You may attach copies of any supporting documents you wish--
but do not expect them to ever be returned to you.
E. THE ANALYSIS
When all the questionnaires have been returned the answers will be
tabulated. For example, out of 44 CAAs in the state, 34 responded.
Of the 34, 20 said "good", 8 said "Poor", 2 said "Don't Know" and
4 didn't answer a certain question. Then the CAAs response will be
compared with how the SEOO answered the question and how the Regional
Office answered it.
-5-
SEOO EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE (Continued)
Lists given by the SEOO and the various agencies will be checked
against each other.
Descriptions of items as written by one group will be compared
against descriptions prepared by other groups.
F. THE REPORT
The report will of necessity emphasize how different groups perceive
performance.
Factual information drawn from the listings will give a view of
actual performance.
The descriptions of significant successes or failures, etc. will
help gain an understanding of the quality of performance.
Designed and produced by the
Alaska/Oregon Field Operations
Team
Charles Chong
Harold Whitehead
Mary Thomas
Peggy Jacobson
Rachel Ensslin
Prepared under the direction of
Mr. James Young, Deputy Director
OEO Region X
with
Mr. John Kent, Regional Counsel
OEO Region X
-6-
SECTION
Q-I
THE SE00 AND THE GOVERNOR
QUES. # REF.
RATING
#1.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided the Governor with
yes no
2a.
information and advice with respect to the
don't know
policies and programs of OEO and other anti-
poverty resources?
LIST how many times and for how long this
has been done during the past 3 months
on positive or negative issues.
#2.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO assisted the Governor
good poor
2a.
concerning the Governor's authority to disapprove
don't know
OEO grants and contracts of assistance?
LIST grants or contracts which have been
disapproved by the Governor in the past
12 months.
3.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO Director acted as the
good poor
2b.
Governor's representative on matters related
don't know
to the poor?
#4. 7501-1
How well has the SEOO Director provided the
good poor
2c.
Governor with information on causes and con-
don't know
ditions of poverty in the state?
LIST how many times and how this has been
done during the past 3 months.
#5.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided an annual written analysis
yes no
6a.
to the Governor, highlighting the principal
don't know
problems and causes of poverty in the state and
CAP 81
including recommended priorities and types of
II-A/B-5
programs to meet those problems?
#6.
7501-1
Has the SE00 provided to the Governor an annual
yes no
three-year anti-poverty plan?
don't know
-7-
SECTION
Q-I
THE SEOO AND THE GOVERNOR
QUES. # REF.
RATING
#7.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO assisted the Governor
good poor
2a.
concerning the Governor's authority to consent
don't know
to the assignment and request termination of
assignments of VISTA Volunteers (Section 810(b)).
LIST the requests made by the Governor for
the termination of assignments of VISTA
Volunteers in the past 12 months.
8-8-
SECTION
Q-II
THE SE00 AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES
QUES. #
REF.
RATING
#1.
7501-1
How well has the SE00 Director acted as the
good poor
2b.
Governor's representative on matters related to
don't know
the poor with respect to other state agencies?
CAP 81
I-C.
LIST the occasions during the past 3 months -
when the SE00 Director has met with other
state agencies on matters related to the
poor.
DESCRIBE the occasions which had significant
results.
#2.
7501-1
Has the SEOO Director provided other state
yes no
2c.
agencies with information and statistics on
don't know
3d.
the causes and conditions of poverty in the
CAP 81
state, on the problems and needs of the poor,
I-A/C
and the programs and efforts to overcome poverty
II-A/B
within the state?
LIST the occasions during the past three
months and identify the agencies.
#3.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided other appropriate state
yes no
6a.
agencies with copies of an annual written
don't know
analysis, highlighting the principal problems
CAP 81
and causes of poverty in the state and including
I-A/C
recommended priorities and types of programs to
II-A/B
meet those problems?
#4.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided to other appropriate
yes no
6a.
state agencies an annual three-year anti-
don't know
poverty plan?
CAP 81
I-A/C
II-A
#5.
7501-1
Has the SEOO given priority to the mobilization
yes no
3a.
and coordination of anti-poverty resources,
don't know
particularly at the state level?
CAP 81
IV-C
-9-
SECTION
Q-II
THE SEOO AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES
RATING
QUES. #
REF.
#6.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO developed effective inter-
good poor
3a.
agency mechanisms to assure good communication be-
don't know
tween state agencies and offices whose activities
CAP 81
affect the poor?
IV-D
DESCRIBE those inter-agency mechanisms which
have had significant success.
#7.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO, on its own initiative,
good poor
3a.
sought out and developed or assisted in the devel-
don't know
4d.
opment of every state resource (programs, expertise,
6h.
funds, etc.) that can be effectively marshalled
and/or coordinated to assist CAAs and other anti-
CAP 81
poverty efforts within the state?
I-C
II-A
LIST agencies and resources mobilized during
IV-C
the past 6 months.
W.P.
DESCRIBE significant successes.
III-C
IV-A/C
#8.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO acted as a special advocate
good poor
3b.
of the poor by -
don't know
a. Working for representation of the poor on
state committees and other instrumentalities
which develop policy, provide advice or
operate programs affecting the poor?
LIST the state committees or other in-
strumentalities during the past year
and give the number and proportion of
representation of the poor.
W.P.
b.
Assessing state poverty-related programs and
good poor
III-D
working to make them more responsive to the
don't know
needs and desires of the poor?
LIST the state-operated programs made more
responsive during the past year.
DESCRIBE significant successes.
-10-
SECTION
Q-II
THE SEOO AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES
RATING
QUES. #
REF.
#8.
7501-1
C.
Assessing state administrative procedures and
good poor
3b.
working to make them more responsive to the
don't know
(cont'd)
needs and desires of the poor.
LIST the state administrative procedures
made more responsive during the past
year.
DESCRIBE significant successes.
W.P.
d.
Developing career opportunities for the poor
good poor
III-D
within other state agencies in coordination
don't know
with the state civil service system.
LIST state agencies and number of jobs
opened for poor people during the past
year.
DESCRIBE significant successes.
#9.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided information and assis-
3c.
tance with the objective of enacting and
amending legislation and developing programs
CAP 81
for the benefit of the poor -
II-A
a. to the state legislature?
yes no
don't know
LIST proposed legislative actions or
programs during the past year.
DESCRIBE significant successes or fail-
ures.
b.
to state planning agencies?
yes no
don't know
LIST proposed legislative actions or
programs during the past year.
DESCRIBE significant successes or fail-
ures.
C. to other state agencies?
yes no
don't know
LIST proposed legislative actions or
programs during the past year.
DESCRIBE significant successes or fail-
ures.
SECTION
Q-II
THE SEOO AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES
QUES. #
REF.
RATING
#10.
7501-1
Does the SEOO work with the state planning
yes no
3e.
agency, other appropriate state agencies, and
don't know
the CAAs in the implementation of BOB Circular
W.P.
A-95 (Part II) which establishes improved
IV-E
state-level coordination of planning in multi-
jurisdictional areas, as it applies to activi-
ties conducted under the EOA.
#11.
7501-1
Does the SEOO assist CAAs in planning and
yes no
4g.
developing boundaries coterminous or comple-
don't know
mentary with other area development, planning
and program units where feasible?
#12.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO sponsored or participated
good poor
4e.
in training programs and workshops for CAA
don't know
staff and Board members, in consultation with
W.P.
OEO grantees and the OEO Regional Office, with
IV-F
particular emphasis on utilization of state
resources and personnel.
LIST the Training programs or workshops
during the past 6 months and identify
state resources and personnel.
DESCRIBE significant successes or failures
in the use of state resources or personnel.
#13.
7501-1
Has the SEOO recommended other state agencies
yes no
6c.
as state resources for the OEO Regional Training
don't know
and Technical Assistance Plan.
#14.
7501-1
Has the SEOO assisted VISTA in any coordination
yes no
6g.
needs with state-operated programs.
don't know
W.P.
LIST state-operated programs coordinated
III-E
within the past year.
-12-
SECTION
Q-II
THE SEOO AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES
QUES. # REF.
RATING
#15.
7501-1
Has the SEOO worked with other state agencies
yes no
6i.
in identifying problems posed by Federal and
don't know
State statutory or administrative requirements
that impede state-level coordination of OEO-
related programs and in developing methods or
recommendations for overcoming those problems.
LIST state agencies and identify the
/
statutory or administrative requirements
during the past year.
-13-
SECTION
Q-III
THE SEOO AND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES
QUES. #
REF.
RATING
#1
7501-1
How well has the SEOO represented the Governor
good poor
2b.
with respect to CAAs?
don't know
#2.
7501-1
How well has the SECO on its own initiative,
good poor
3a.
sought out or assisted in the development of
don't know
every state, Federal, community and private
CAP 81
agency resource (programs, expertise, funds,
II-A
etc.) that can be effectively marshalled and/or
IV-E
coordinated to assist CAAs and other anti-poverty
efforts within the state?
W.P.
IV-C
LIST resources mobilized during the past 6
months.
DESCRIBE significant successes.
#2
7501-1
How well has the SEOO acted as a special advocate
3b.
for the poor in state government by such activi-
ties as:
a. Working for representation of the poor on
good poor
state committees and other instrumentalities
don't know
which develop policy, provide advice or
operate programs affecting the poor?
LIST the state committees or other in-
strumentalities where representation
for the poor has been requested of the
SEOO by CAAs during the past year.
DESCRIBE successes and failures.
W.P.
b.
Assessing state-poverty-related programs and
good poor
III-D
working to make them more responsive to the
don't know
needs and desires of the poor?
LIST the state-operated programs which the
CAAs have asked the SEOO to assist to
make more responsive during the past
year.
DESCRIBE significant successes or failures.
-14-
SECTION
Q-III
THE SEOO AND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES
QUES. #
REF.
RATING
#3.
7501-1
C.
Assessing state administrative procedures
good poor
3c.
and working to make them more responsive to
don't know
(cont'd)
the needs and desires of the poor.
LIST the state administrative procedures
which the CAAs have asked the SEOO to
assist to make more responsive during
the past year.
DESCRIBE significant successes or failures.
W.P.
d.
Developing career opportunities for the poor
good poor
III-D
within other state agencies in coordination
don't know
with the state civil service system.
LIST the state agencies and number and
kinds of jobs developed during the
past year.
DESCRIBE successes and failures.
#4.
7501-1
Has the SEOO consulted regularly with local
yes no
3c.
CAAs and other representatives of the poor on
don't know
legislation they feel should be recommended to
the Governor or state legislature?
LIST legislation on which the SEOO consulted
the CAAs or other representatives of the
poor during the past year.
DESCRIBE results.
#5.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided OEO grantees with infor-
yes no
3d.
mation and statistics - using such devices
don't know
2c.
as periodic bulletins, annual reports, meetings,
etc. - on the problems and needs of the poor and
CAP 81
the programs and efforts to overcome poverty
I-A
within the state?
II-A/B
LIST the times and identify the methods
(bulletins, meetings, etc.) during the
past 3 months.
-15-
SECTION
Q-III
THE SEOO AND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES
QUES. # REF.
RATING
#6.
7501-1
Has the SEOO worked with the community action
yes no
3e.
agencies of the state in the implementation of
don't know
BOB Circular A-95 (Part II) which establishes
W.P.
improved state-level coordination of planning in
IV-E
multi-jurisdictional areas, as it applies to
activities conducted under the Economic Oppor-
tunity Act.
#7.
7501-1
Has the SEOO assisted CAAs in planning and devel-
yes no
4g.
oping boundaries coterminous or complementary with
don't know
other area development, planning and program units
where feasible?
#8.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO provided special technical
good poor
4a.
assistance where needed to Community Action Agen-
don't know
cies, community groups, and other grantees or po-
CAP 81
tential grantees, in developing, conducting and
II-A/B
administering programs to alleviate poverty?
W.P.
LIST occasions when special Technical Assis-
I-B
tance has been provided, identifying sub-
IV-A/D
ject and who provided the Technical Assis-
tance during the past 6 months.
DESCRIBE significant successes or failures.
#9.
7501-1
Has the SEOO consulted with the CAAS --- using
yes no
4a.
Checkpoint Form 76 ******* at the time of grantee pre-
don't know
review and when developing its own annual re-
CAP 81
funding request to determine OEO grantee needs
II-B
for specialized technical assistance and to get
advice on how the SEOO can assist in meeting
W.P.
these needs?
I-B
LIST the occasions when the SEOO has consulted
with the CAAS on their needs for specialized
technical assistance during the past 6 months.
Identify how this was done - by letter,
field visit, meeting, telephone.
SECTION
Q-III
THE SEOO AND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES
RATING
QUES. #
REF.
#10.
7501-1
Did the SEOO give priority emphasis to the
yes no
4a.
hiring and training of personnel specialized
don't know
in those areas most needed by the CAAs and other
OEO grantees?
LIST the priority needs during the past year.
DESCRIBE the personnel hired to meet these
needs.
#11.
7501-1
Has the SEOO participated in the annual field
yes no
4b.
pre-review of an OEO grantee, along with an OEO
don't know
representative (Regional or Headquarters) ?
W.P.
III-A
LIST the grantee pre-reviews attended by the
SECO in the past 6 months.
DESCRIBE pre-reviews when the SEOO has been
helpful to the CAA Board in exercising
its policy decision-making responsibilities.
#12.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO provided advice and assis-
good poor
4b.
tance at an early or pre-review stage in the de-
don't know
velopment of program proposals by CAAS and other
CAP 81
OEO grantees?
II-B
LIST the occasions when the CAAs and grantees
W.P.
were assisted by the SEOO in the past 6 months
I-B/C
at an early or pre-review stage.
#13.
7501-1
Did the SEOO sign the Form 77 (Checkpoint Pro-
yes no
4b.
cedure) on site at the conclusion of the field
don't know
pre-review or no later than 15 days after re-
ceipt of the form?
-17-
SECTION
Q-III
THE SEOO AND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES
RATING
QUES. #
REF.
#14.
7501-1
Did the SEOO indicate on the form, or an attach-
yes no
4b.
ment thereto, the specific kind and degree of
don't know
technical assistance it will be able to provide
the grantee, identifying those resources it will
try to make available?
LIST the grants and grantees when this has
or has not been done during the past 6
months.
#15.
7501-1
Has the SEOO jointly participated with the
yes no
6e.
Regional Office in the evaluation of OEO-
don't know
funded programs?
LIST the evaluations during the past 6 months
#16.
7501-1
Has the SEOO assisted grantees in taking any
yes no
4c.
corrective actions, recommended by OEO as a
don't know
result of evaluation reports.
LIST the occasions when grantees were
assisted during the past 6 months,
DESCRIBE significant cases of assistance
and results.
#17.
7501-1
Has the SEOO assisted grantees in taking any
yes no
4c.
corrective actions, recommended by OEO as a
don't know
result of audit reports?
LIST the occasions when grantees were assisted
during the past 6 months.
DESCRIBE significant cases of assistance
and results.
-18-
SECTION
Q-III
THE SEOO AND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES
RATING
QUES. #
REF.
#18.
7501-1
Has the SEOO sponsored or participated in train-
yes no
4e.
ing programs and workshops for CAA staff and
don't know
Board members, in consultation with OEO grantees
CAP 81
and the OEO Regional Office, with particular
II-B
emphasis on utilization of state resources and
personnel?
W.P.
IV-F
LIST the training programs and workshops,
identifying the state resources or per-
sonnel during the past 6 months.
DESCRIBE significant successes or failures
in the use of state resources and personnel.
#19.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO provided information and
good poor
4f.
assistance to CAAs and other OEO grantees in
don't know
planning, developing, and operating volunteer
CAP 81
programs?
II-B
LIST the grantees who requested and
W.P.
received this help during the past 6 months.
III-E
#20.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided an annual three-year anti-
yes no
6a.
poverty plan for the state and an annual written
don't know
analysis highlighting the principal problems and
CAP 81
causes of poverty in the state including rec-
J-A
ommended priorities and types of programs to meet
those problems?
#21.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO monitored some or all of
6f.
the OEO-funded programs within the state if
good poor
it has the staff capability and if this activity
don't know
is part of the approved SEOO Work Program, which
includes arrangements for periodic written re-
ports plus other reporting of special activity
or problems, to the appropriate OEO grant office.
LIST grantees where significant monitoring
was done during the past 6 months.
DESCRIBE circumstances and results.
-19-
SECTION
Q-IV
SEOO AND OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES
RATING
QUES. #
REF.
#1
7501-1
How well has the SEOO represented the Governor
good poor
2b.
with respect to other Federal Agencies?
don't know
#2.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO, on its own initiative,
good poor
3a.
sought out and developed or assisted in the
don't know
4d.
development of Federal resources (programs,
expertise, funds, etc.) that can be effectively
CAP 81
marshalled and/or coordinated to assist CAAs and
IV-E
other anti-poverty efforts within the state?
W.P.
LIST federal resources mobilized during the
IV-C
past 6 months.
DESCRIBE significant successes.
#3.
7501-1
Has the SEOO advised and assisted OEO in i-
yes no
6i.
dentifying problems posed by Federal and state
don't know
3e.
statutory or administrative requirements that
impede state-level coordination of OEO-related
programs, and in developing methods or recommenda
tions for overcoming those problems?
LIST statutory or administrative require-
ments during the past year.
SECTION
Q-V
SEOO AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
RATING
IES. #
REF.
1.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO represented the Governor
good poor
2b.
with respect to local units of government?
don't know
2.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO sought out and developed
good poor
3a.
or assisted in the development of community
don't know
4d.
resources (programs, expertise, funds, etc.)
that can be effectively marshalled and/or coordina
CAP 81
ted to assist CAAs and other anti-poverty efforts
II-A
within the state?
W.P.
LIST community resources mobilized during
IV-C
the past 6 months.
DESCRIBE significant successes.
#3.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided local government units
yes no
3d.
with information and statisitics - using such
don't know
2c.
devices as periodic bulletins, annual reports,
meetings, etc. on the problems and needs of the
CAP 81
poor and the programs and efforts to overcome
I-A/C
poverty within the state?
II-A/B
LIST the local government units and identify
how this was done during the past 3 months.
#4.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO provided special technical
good poor
4a.
assistance where needed to local government
don't know
agencies, in developing, donducting and ad-
CAP 81
ministering programs to alleviate poverty?
II-A
LIST occasions during the past six months when
special technical assistance was provided.
Identify subject and who provided the tech-
nical assistance.
DESCRIBE significant successes or failures,
-21-
SECTION
Q-VI
SEOO AND COMMUNITY GROUPS
RATING
QUES. #
REF.
#1.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO provided special technical
good poor
4a.
assistance where needed to community groups in
don't know
developing, conducting and administering pro-
CAP 81
grams to alleviate poverty?
II-A
LIST occasions during the past six months when
W.P.
special technical assistance was provided.
I-B
Identify subject and who provided the tech-
nical assistance.
DESCRIBE significant successes or failures.
#2.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided community groups, private
yes no
3d.
agencies, and general public with information
don't know
2c.
and statistics - using such devices as periodic
bulletins, annual reports, meetings, etc. -
CAP 81
on the problems and needs of the poor and the
I-A/C
programs and efforts to overcome poverty within
II-A/B
the state?
W.P.
LIST the community groups, private agencies
IV-H
and general public items provided infor-
mation during the past 3 months.
SECTION
Q-VII
THE SEOO AND THE OEO REGIONAL OFFICE
RATING
QUES. #
REF.
#1
7501-1
How well has the SEOO represented the Governor
good poor
2b.
with respect to OEO?
don't know
#2.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO Director provided the OEO
good poor
2c.
Regional Office with information on the causes
don't know
and conditions of poverty in the state?
LIST the documents provided during the
past year.
#3.
7501-1
Has the SEOO advised the OEO Regional Office
yes no
6a.
on the criteria established under Section 241 (a)
don't know
and (b) of the EOA, which are designed to
CAP 81
achieve within the states an equitable dis-
I-A/C
tribution of assistance between urban and rural
II-A/B
areas under Title II of the Act?
#4.
7501-1
Has the SEOO assisted in developing the total
yes no
6b.
funding plan for the state?
don't know
#5.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided an annual written analysis
yes no
6a.
to the OEO Regional Office (due July 1), high-
don't t know
lighting the principal problems and causes of
poverty in the state and including recommended
priorities and types of programs to meet those
problems?
#6.
7501-1
Has the SECO prepared an annual three-year anti-
yes no
6a.
poverty plan for the state?
don't know
#7.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO advised OEO on funding
good poor
6d.
requests for all applicants within the state or
don't t know
who will operate within the state with written
comments on these applications.
-23-
SECTION
Q-VII
THE SEOO AND THE OEO REGIONAL OFFICE
RATING
QUES. #
REF.
#8.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO consulted with the Regional
good poor
4a.
Office to determine OEO grantee needs for special-
don't know
ized technical assistance and to get advice on how
W.P.
the SEOO can assist in meeting these needs?
IV-D
LIST occasions and grantees during the past
6 months when this was done.
DESCRIBE significant occasions when the SEOO
responded to Regional Office requests.
#9.
7501-1
Has the SEOO participated in the development of
yes no
6c.
the OEO Headquarters and Regional Training and
don't know
Technical Assistance Plans?
W.P.
III-C
_0.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO consulted with the OEO
good poor
4e.
Regional Office, with particular emphasis on
don't know
utilization of state resources and personnel
W.P.
in sponsoring or participating in training pro-
IV-F
grams and workshops for CAA staff and Board
members?
LIST the state resources suggested by SEOO
during the past 6 months.
DESCRIBE significant successes or failures.
#11.
7501-1
Has the SEOO jointly participated with the
yes no
6e.
Regional Office in the evaluation of OEO-funded
dont' know
programs and in the development of standards for
the evaluation of program effectiveness?
#12.
7501-1
Has the SEOO consulted with OEO to assist
yes no
4c.
grantees in taking any corrective actions
don't know
recommended by CEO as a result of evaluation
and audit reports?
LIST the grantees during the past 6 months.
DESCRIBE significant cases and results.
SECTION
Q-VII
THE SEOO AND THE OEO REGIONAL OFFICE
RATING
QUES. #
REF.
#13.
7501-1
Has the SEOO provided the Regional Office with
yes no
6f.
periodic written reports on its monitoring
don't know
activities plus other reporting of special
activity or problems to the appropriate OEO
Grant office?
LIST grantees where significant monitoring
was done during the past 6 months.
DESCRIBE circumstances and results.
#14.
7501-1
Has the SEOO advised the OEO Regional Office on
yes no
6g.
VISTA operations within the state and in the
don't t know
development of an annual state VISTA plan?
15.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO assisted VISTA in any
good poor
6g.
coordination needs with state-operated programs?
don't know
W.P.
III-E
#16.
7501-1
How well has the SEOO advised the Regional Office
good poor
6g.
on special problems in the state that might
don't know
develop as a result of the activities or presence
of VISTA Volunteers, and assisted the Regional
Office in resolving such problems?
LIST the special problems during the past
six months.
#17.
7501-1
Has the SEOO advised and assisted OEO in identi-
yes no
6i.
fying problems posed by Federal and state statu-
don't know
3e.
tory or administrative requirements that impede
state-level coordination of OEO-related programs,
and in developing methods or recommendations for
overcoming those problems?
LIST the problems during the past year.
25.
SECTION
Q-VIII
QUES. #
THE OEO REGIONAL OFFICE AND THE SEOO
RATING
REF.
#1.
7501-1
How well has the Regional Office worked jointly
good poor
7c.
with the SEOO to strengthen the SEOO staff capa--
don't know
bility to carry out its work programs and to
W.P.
overcome any weaknesses that may be revealed by
II-D
evaluations?
LIST joint training programs or workshops.
Identify number of SEOO-staff invited
/
and attending and their job levels during
the past year.
#2.
7501-1
Has the Regional Office ensured that the SEOO
yes no
7d.
is consulted concerning OEO Regional Office
don't know
plans and priorities with regard to OEO grantees?
LIST joint staff meetings held during the
past six months. Identify number of SEOO
staff invited and attending and their job
levels.
#3.
7501-1
Has the Regional Office, when flexible or other
yes no
7d.
OEO funds become available for additional pro-
don't know
grams in a state, first consulted with the SEOO
before committing such funds?
#4.
7501-1
Has the Regional Office involved the SEOO for-
yes no
7e.
mally in the development of the state funding
don't know
6b.
plans?
#5.
7501-1
Has the Regional Office involved the SEOO for-
yes no
7e.
mally in the development of the annual Training
don't know
6c.
and Technical Assistance Plan?
-26-