Images (5)
Document
| id |
id
75718906
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 5HARVARD UNIVERSITY
School of Public Health
Department of Physiology
55 Van Dyke Street
Boston, Massachusetts
Mr. H. B. Viedt,
April 29, 1924.
United States Radium Corporation,
422 Alden Street, Orange, N.J.
My dear Mr. Viedt:
I have been able to obtain an impartial opinion on Dr. Barry's
abilities and training and find them excellent.
We may, therefore,
give his opinions as to the cases a good deal of credence.
From material which we have been able to dig out of the
literature here and piece together with your experiences in
Newark it would seem that radium is the probable cause of the
trouble.
We have not been able to find any direct cases of
bone necrosis from exposure to radium, but we have, curiously
enough, discovered several instances of bone necrosis due to
X-ray.
You will remember that Dr. Barry thought he showed us
changes in the bone of the jaws of Miss Smith and of Miss Schaub,
individuals who had not had teeth pulled.
I am fortunate in
being able to get here most excellent opinions upon the X-rays
of these cases which Dr. Barry has sent me.
It seems to us that
if radium affects the bones of the jaw in individuals whose teeth
have not been pulled it should affect other bones in the body --
at least to some degree -- and the most likely area in the case of
all your workers is the hands.
I have communicated with
Dr. H. L. Alexander, 1019 Broad Street, Newark, who is an
extraordinarily able and reliable person with whom I have been
associated during the past year in work for the New Jersey Zinc
Company, and have asked him to make X-rays of the hands of the
individuals you bring to him.
I enclose a copy of my note. I
recognize, of course, the need to move cautiously in the matter,
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to