Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 6
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

A.R.-2 12/5/25. I understand that you are chiefly concerned with the effect which the pending litigation may have un on the sale of the luminous paint manufactured by the company, and that you fear that 3 settlement of the cases may be regarded by the trade as an admission of the elaim that the application of the paint to watch diels and other articles is attended with great danger to the operator. While it is true that a settlement of these cases may be so construed by some of your customers, the question which we should consider is whether the situation of the company will be improved by a trial of the case. There seems to be no aoubt but that the plaintiff can offer considerable proof. which will tend to establish the dangerous character of the luminous paint; and while we will have strong evidence to the contrary, it is probable that the plaintiff¹s testimony will receive greater publicity in the press than the testimony offered on behalf of the company. If the decision of the ease would rest alone upon the question whether the plaintiff's illness was occasioned by the use of the paint, I would have little hope of success because the sympathy of the jury will naturally be with the plaintiff and under these jroumstances, the jury will be inclined to believe the testimony which will be offered by the plaintiff concerning the injurious effects of the paint.

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
43d34583326e401d
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75720382
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75720382",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720382",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Received to A. Roeder, December 5, 1925",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720382",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000642_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000642_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000642_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 6,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75720382",
    "label": "Letters Received to A. Roeder, December 5, 1925",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720382"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75720382",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720382",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Received to A. Roeder, December 5, 1925",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720382",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000642_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000642_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000642_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 6,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720382",
    "naId": 75720382,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000642_Page_2.jpg",
    "mediaId": "43d34583326e401d",
    "ocrText": "A.R.-2\n12/5/25.\nI understand that you are chiefly concerned with\nthe effect which the pending litigation may have un on the\nsale of the luminous paint manufactured by the company, and\nthat you fear that 3 settlement of the cases may be regarded\nby the trade as an admission of the elaim that the application\nof the paint to watch diels and other articles is attended\nwith great danger to the operator.\nWhile it is true that a settlement of these cases\nmay be so construed by some of your customers, the question\nwhich we should consider is whether the situation of the\ncompany will be improved by a trial of the case.\nThere seems to be no aoubt but that the plaintiff\ncan offer considerable proof. which will tend to establish\nthe dangerous character of the luminous paint; and while\nwe will have strong evidence to the contrary, it is probable\nthat the plaintiff¹s testimony will receive greater publicity\nin the press than the testimony offered on behalf of the\ncompany.\nIf the decision of the ease would rest alone upon\nthe question whether the plaintiff's illness was occasioned\nby the use of the paint, I would have little hope of success\nbecause the sympathy of the jury will naturally be with the\nplaintiff and under these jroumstances, the jury will be\ninclined to believe the testimony which will be offered by\nthe plaintiff concerning the injurious effects of the paint."
}