Ask the Scholar

Page 3 of 8
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 3

OCR

-3- to which Dr. Knef replied that he would not guarantes a cure but he could keep the patient from getting worse until she would probably die of some other cause. Stated that he could do more than any one else in the treatment of such cases. He suggested that he be given a list of the girls who had previously worked for us so that he could locate them and possibly influence then to take his treatment. Stated that he was developing a machine or method of treatment which he believed would make it possible to extiact some of the radium from the bones of living patients. He explained in considerable detail how on this recent case as well as other cases he could testify either way, that is, whether the patient was suffering from radium poisoning or pyorrhea. Stated his opinion could be as he wished it to be at the time of testifyinge Stated he could testify intelligently whether the case was either radium poisoning or pyorrhea and that he could not be successfully contradicted. Also said that expert witnesses always testify in favor of the side that paid theme After a more or less lengthy discussion by Dr. Knef, lir. Cross asiced him what his proposition wase Dr. Knef stated that he had proposed to us that we pay him ten thousand dollars for services so far rendered in treating these various cases, and that he thought this was a reastnable amount. He explained the fairness of this charge by going into more 02 less detail regarding the work he hed done on the Maggia, Carlough, and Maillefer cases, and referring briefly to work done on other cases. Stated that he às now treating a number of other cases and that he must be paid either by us or by some one. He said he wanted to know whother he was going to play ball for us or against us. Stated that if we were not interested in his proposition that he proposed to sue a number of his patients for large amounts and that he in turn would have them sue us. He also stated that if these suits were brought against us there would be no settlements out of court and that there would be no Kalisches in the suits. He also stated that he would

Page data

Page
3
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
de7eb46e4d6013eb
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75720894
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75720894",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720894",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Deposition, May 21, 1926",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720894",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000792_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000792_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000792_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 8,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75720894",
    "label": "Deposition, May 21, 1926",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720894"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75720894",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720894",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Deposition, May 21, 1926",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720894",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000792_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000792_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000792_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 8,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75720894",
    "naId": 75720894,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 3,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000792_Page_3.jpg",
    "mediaId": "de7eb46e4d6013eb",
    "ocrText": "-3-\nto which Dr. Knef replied that he would not guarantes a cure but he\ncould keep the patient from getting worse until she would probably\ndie of some other cause.\nStated that he could do more than any one\nelse in the treatment of such cases.\nHe suggested that he be given a list of the girls who\nhad previously worked for us so that he could locate them and possibly\ninfluence then to take his treatment. Stated that he was developing\na machine or method of treatment which he believed would make it possible\nto extiact some of the radium from the bones of living patients.\nHe\nexplained in considerable detail how on this recent case as well as other\ncases he could testify either way, that is, whether the patient was\nsuffering from radium poisoning or pyorrhea.\nStated his opinion could\nbe as he wished it to be at the time of testifyinge Stated he could\ntestify intelligently whether the case was either radium poisoning or\npyorrhea and that he could not be successfully contradicted. Also said\nthat expert witnesses always testify in favor of the side that paid theme\nAfter a more or less lengthy discussion by Dr. Knef,\nlir. Cross asiced him what his proposition wase\nDr. Knef stated that he\nhad proposed to us that we pay him ten thousand dollars for services so\nfar rendered in treating these various cases, and that he thought this\nwas a reastnable amount.\nHe explained the fairness of this charge\nby going into more 02 less detail regarding the work he hed done on\nthe Maggia, Carlough, and Maillefer cases, and referring briefly to work\ndone on other cases.\nStated that he às now treating a number of other\ncases and that he must be paid either by us or by some one. He said he\nwanted to know whother he was going to play ball for us or against us.\nStated that if we were not interested in his proposition that he proposed\nto sue a number of his patients for large amounts and that he in turn\nwould have them sue us.\nHe also stated that if these suits were brought\nagainst us there would be no settlements out of court and that there\nwould be no Kalisches in the suits. He also stated that he would"
}