Ask the Scholar
Page 15 of 24
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
-15-
An examination of our tables does not indicate in any way that these
girls had been exposed to radio-active material. In studying our figures we
separated the girls Into groups according to the time that they had been
ing with luminous material. One has every right to expect that if the luminous
paint were a hasard that those girls worling the longest would give some indi-
ogtion of that fact, or at least a certain percentage of the number would. Our
analysis is as follows:
43 yrs. up
2-6 yrs.
1-2 yrs.
Less than 1 yro
Blood Counts
10 girls
24 girls
15 girls
10 girls
Red
4.86
4.99
4.96
4.83
White
8350
8260
9050
9530
Neutrophiles
64.5
64.4
65.1
64.9
Lymphocytes
25.7
24.8
25.3
25.7
The average count for the girls woricing less than one year can be
disoarded because of the small number and because several of those who worloed
but two or three months showed a high white count. It would be better to con-
sider the following analysis of a group of Y.W.C.A. girls exanined by Dr.
Larimore (3).
R.B.C.
W.B.C.
10%
less than 4
26.6%
less than 6000
47.4.
between 4-4.5
20.5%
between 6000-7000
36.00
11 4.5-5
19.1%
11
7000-8000
5.6%
19 5-5.5
20.3%
8000-9000
1.0%
11 5.5-6
8.8%
19 9000-10000
2.0%
es
10000-11000
2.%
ver 11000
leutrophiles
Eosinophiles
24.8% less than 60
29.6%
less than 1
60.4% botween 60-72
65.7% between 1-4
14.8% over 72
4.7% over 4
Unfortunately we cannot compare the lymphoeytes and large monomuclears.
This group consisted of supposedly normal girls who had not been exposed
to any industrial hazard, The avorage red count for the 253 girls examined was
4.42 with extremes of 2.8 and 5.7. The average white count was 7200 with extromes
of 3200 and 12000. Table 2 figures serve to emphasize the necessity of not
Page data
- Page
- 15
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- b07eb0fb72bcf3dd
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75721294
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75721294",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75721294",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, 1926",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75721294",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000914_Page_01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000914_Page_01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000914_Page_01.jpg",
"imageCount": 24,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75721294",
"label": "Report, 1926",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75721294"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75721294",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75721294",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, 1926",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75721294",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000914_Page_01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000914_Page_01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000914_Page_01.jpg",
"imageCount": 24,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75721294",
"naId": 75721294,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 15,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000914_Page_15.jpg",
"mediaId": "b07eb0fb72bcf3dd",
"ocrText": "-15-\nAn examination of our tables does not indicate in any way that these\ngirls had been exposed to radio-active material. In studying our figures we\nseparated the girls Into groups according to the time that they had been\ning with luminous material. One has every right to expect that if the luminous\npaint were a hasard that those girls worling the longest would give some indi-\nogtion of that fact, or at least a certain percentage of the number would. Our\nanalysis is as follows:\n43 yrs. up\n2-6 yrs.\n1-2 yrs.\nLess than 1 yro\nBlood Counts\n10 girls\n24 girls\n15 girls\n10 girls\nRed\n4.86\n4.99\n4.96\n4.83\nWhite\n8350\n8260\n9050\n9530\nNeutrophiles\n64.5\n64.4\n65.1\n64.9\nLymphocytes\n25.7\n24.8\n25.3\n25.7\nThe average count for the girls woricing less than one year can be\ndisoarded because of the small number and because several of those who worloed\nbut two or three months showed a high white count. It would be better to con-\nsider the following analysis of a group of Y.W.C.A. girls exanined by Dr.\nLarimore (3).\nR.B.C.\nW.B.C.\n10%\nless than 4\n26.6%\nless than 6000\n47.4.\nbetween 4-4.5\n20.5%\nbetween 6000-7000\n36.00\n11 4.5-5\n19.1%\n11\n7000-8000\n5.6%\n19 5-5.5\n20.3%\n8000-9000\n1.0%\n11 5.5-6\n8.8%\n19 9000-10000\n2.0%\nes\n10000-11000\n2.%\nver 11000\nleutrophiles\nEosinophiles\n24.8% less than 60\n29.6%\nless than 1\n60.4% botween 60-72\n65.7% between 1-4\n14.8% over 72\n4.7% over 4\nUnfortunately we cannot compare the lymphoeytes and large monomuclears.\nThis group consisted of supposedly normal girls who had not been exposed\nto any industrial hazard, The avorage red count for the 253 girls examined was\n4.42 with extremes of 2.8 and 5.7. The average white count was 7200 with extromes\nof 3200 and 12000. Table 2 figures serve to emphasize the necessity of not"
}