Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
75722299
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3SAN LB 12
FREDERIC J. FAULKS
LINDABURY, DEPUE & FAULKS
J. EDWARD ASHMEAD
JOSIAH STRYKER
JOHN w. BISHOP, JR.
PRUDENTIAL BUILDING
TELEPHONE
WALTER D. BARKER
ULLERRY 1755
JAMES E. M.TAMS
BURTIS S.HORNER
763 BROAD STREET, NEWARK, N.J.
January 26, 1928
RE: FREYAR VS. U. S. RADIUM CORP. #3486-LDF
C. B. Lee, President,
U.S.Radium Corporation,
535 Pearl St.
,
New York City.
Dear Mr. Lee,
Several days ago Mr. Berry came to my office and
told me that the Vice Chancellor had suggested to him that
the parties agree upon the facts of the case.
Mr. Smith
also advised me that the Vice Chancellor had written a
letter to him making the same suggestion and that he had
replied to the Vice Chancellor stating that he would take
up the matter upon his return from North Carolina. I do
not believe that we can reach any agreement as to the facts
as that is the principal matter in difference between us.
Mr. Berry, following his custom of talking about
his case, told me that Dr. Sochocky claims that he knew
that the paint in question was dangerous; that he had a
bitter controversy with Mr. Roeder over this matter that
Sochocky claimed that the Waterbury mixture should be used
which, as Mr. Berry explained to me, involved the use of
oil instead of water in mixing the paint and which, as
Sochocky claimed, would not involve as great danger because,
First, it had a very unpleasant taste which would pre-
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to