Ask the Scholar

Page 3 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 3

OCR

UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY November 6, 1928 NOV 1928 Mr. H. H. Barker United States Radium Corporation 535 Pearl Street New York City My dear Barker: Last evening I wired you stating that it will be possible to attend the examination of the girls during the week of November 19. I shall, however, not be able to leave Columbia until late Friday evening or Saturday morning, and I shall there- fore have to miss the football game, much to my regret. As soon as I know more definitely about train service I shall let you know. I hope, however, to have a good visit with the Underwoods. Tomorrow or day after I expect to return to you one of the spinthariscopes fitted with zinc sulfide screen whose natural scintillations are considerably lower than the usual specimens of zinc sulfide show. We shall send at the same time a sample of Hammer Special Zinc Sulfide and a sample of Grade A, furnished by the Denver Fire Clay Company. The screen which you will find mounted in the instrument is Hammer Special Grade. Grade A appears to be somewhat more free from natural scintillations than the Special. After some experimenting we finally found that at least some of the screens which we had prepared and con- demned were not so bad as we had suspected. We found that one of the spinthariscopes which you sent is infected, and this was the one which we used in our tests. It is barely possible that this instru- ment became contaminated with a trace of radioactive material in our laboratory. The natural scintillations of the instrument which we are planning to send you will be about 50 in three to four minutes - 5 min when Hammer Special is used, and about 25 when Grade A is used. The fluctuations, however, are large and we believe that this is in part due to a slight contamination with radioactive material of the sample tested. We have also gone over the data which you sub- mitted on the radium content of the excreta in the Dunn case, and we have placed your results alongside of the values found for the radium content of the excreta in the Dumschott case and we find that your values are about 10 times as high when expressed as grams radium per grams dry residue as our values for Mrs. Dumschott; 30 I wish to ask whether there is a chance that you may have the decimal point mis- placed in your calculations. Our most active specimen we found to contain 2.8 X 10⁻¹⁰ grams radium per gram, while you report in the university OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY -2- Mr. H. H. Barker Durin Case 5 micrograms per gram which is a value nearly 20 times that of our value. We use nitric acid to dissolve the residue. I know that you will keep me advised about the progress of the plans for the tests. It seems to me we had better send the spinthariscope and sample of zinc sulfide directly to Dr. Flinn so as to avoid a chance for contamination in your office. In case we find the girls active by the gamma ray method of testing, would it not be advisable to check the results against the expired air using the large Lind ionization chamber? With very kind regards, I remain Sincerely yours, Haman Schlundt Herman Schlundt. We shall also and Flenn HS Samples of the two grades of phosphorescent gns for making new screens. C b Have just s covered that one of the three spritharricopes which you sent is an whilition in strument. un to this time we had confined our tests to two of the instru ments, and had left the third in box ant and many thanks for this present HS.

Page data

Page
3
Source index
0
Type
document
Media ID
151f8afd07dc2019
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75723314
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75723314",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723314",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Received to H.H. Barker, November 6, 1928",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723314",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001497_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001497_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001497_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75723314",
    "label": "Letters Received to H.H. Barker, November 6, 1928",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723314"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75723314",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723314",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Received to H.H. Barker, November 6, 1928",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723314",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001497_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001497_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001497_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723314",
    "naId": 75723314,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 3,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001497.pdf",
    "mediaId": "151f8afd07dc2019",
    "ocrText": "UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI\nCOLUMBIA\nDEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY\nNovember 6, 1928\nNOV 1928\nMr. H. H. Barker\nUnited States Radium Corporation\n535 Pearl Street\nNew York City\nMy dear Barker:\nLast evening I wired you stating that it will\nbe possible to attend the examination of the girls during the week\nof November 19. I shall, however, not be able to leave Columbia\nuntil late Friday evening or Saturday morning, and I shall there-\nfore have to miss the football game, much to my regret. As soon\nas I know more definitely about train service I shall let you know.\nI hope, however, to have a good visit with the Underwoods.\nTomorrow or day after I expect to return to\nyou one of the spinthariscopes fitted with zinc sulfide screen\nwhose natural scintillations are considerably lower than the\nusual specimens of zinc sulfide show. We shall send at the same\ntime a sample of Hammer Special Zinc Sulfide and a sample of Grade\nA, furnished by the Denver Fire Clay Company. The screen which you\nwill find mounted in the instrument is Hammer Special Grade. Grade\nA appears to be somewhat more free from natural scintillations\nthan the Special. After some experimenting we finally found\nthat at least some of the screens which we had prepared and con-\ndemned were not so bad as we had suspected. We found that one of\nthe spinthariscopes which you sent is infected, and this was the one\nwhich we used in our tests. It is barely possible that this instru-\nment became contaminated with a trace of radioactive material in our\nlaboratory. The natural scintillations of the instrument which we\nare planning to send you will be about 50 in three to four minutes - 5 min\nwhen Hammer Special is used, and about 25 when Grade A is used. The\nfluctuations, however, are large and we believe that this is in part\ndue to a slight contamination with radioactive material of the sample\ntested.\nWe have also gone over the data which you sub-\nmitted on the radium content of the excreta in the Dunn case, and we\nhave placed your results alongside of the values found for the radium\ncontent of the excreta in the Dumschott case and we find that your\nvalues are about 10 times as high when expressed as grams radium per\ngrams dry residue as our values for Mrs. Dumschott; 30 I wish to ask\nwhether there is a chance that you may have the decimal point mis-\nplaced in your calculations. Our most active specimen we found to\ncontain 2.8 X 10⁻¹⁰ grams radium per gram, while you report in the\nuniversity OF MISSOURI\nCOLUMBIA\nDEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY\n-2-\nMr. H. H. Barker\nDurin Case 5 micrograms per gram which is a value nearly 20 times that\nof our value. We use nitric acid to dissolve the residue.\nI know that you will keep me advised about the\nprogress of the plans for the tests. It seems to me we had better\nsend the spinthariscope and sample of zinc sulfide directly to Dr.\nFlinn so as to avoid a chance for contamination in your office.\nIn case we find the girls active by the gamma ray method of testing,\nwould it not be advisable to check the results against the expired\nair using the large Lind ionization chamber?\nWith very kind regards, I remain\nSincerely yours,\nHaman Schlundt\nHerman Schlundt.\nWe shall also and Flenn\nHS\nSamples of the two grades of phosphorescent\ngns for making new screens.\nC\nb\nHave just s covered that one of the three\nspritharricopes which you sent is an\nwhilition in strument. un to this time\nwe had confined our tests to two of\nthe instru ments, and had left the\nthird in box ant and many\nthanks for this present\nHS."
}