Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 2
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
February 6th, 1929.
Dr. Herman Schlundt,
University of Missouri,
Columbia, Mo.
Dear Dr. Schlundt:
Our plans for conducting the tests
on the five girls have been changed, and at present
February 19th, has been set as the day on which we
will begin this work.
There is still some question as to
exactly when it would be possible to examine Mrs. Mae
Cubberley Canfield. As I understand the situation
Mr. Berry has requested that Mr. Markley and Mr. Smith
have authorization from the Court for a date, and
that will come up for a hearing next Monday, February
11th. We are hoping that the Judge will set either
Friday the 15th or the next week as the time for this
examination, so that you may complete both tasks while
you are here.
At present your presence will be
required on the 19th of February, and I would suggest
that you be available on the 18th, to discuss with
Dr. Failla your plans.
On Monday of next week we hope to have
more information regarding Mrs. Canfield, and I will
advise you immediately.
I hope that this change will not
materially inconvenience you.
Referring to your letter of January
22nd and February 1st, suggesting corrections on our
paper: I must advise that I have not as yet received
the proofs. I had hoped that the article would appear
in the February issue, but apparently it will be March
at the earliest, or possibly April. The article on
the Examination of the Post Mortem specimens of Leman
appeared in the January issue.
Very truly yours,
HHBarker:RH
Vice President.
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- 4b8e1cf7e485acc9
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75723792
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75723792",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723792",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Dr. Herman Schlundt, February 6, 1929",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723792",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001625.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001625.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001625.jpg",
"imageCount": 2,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75723792",
"label": "Letters Sent to Dr. Herman Schlundt, February 6, 1929",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723792"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75723792",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723792",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Dr. Herman Schlundt, February 6, 1929",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723792",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001625.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001625.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001625.jpg",
"imageCount": 2,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75723792",
"naId": 75723792,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001625.pdf",
"mediaId": "4b8e1cf7e485acc9",
"ocrText": "February 6th, 1929.\nDr. Herman Schlundt,\nUniversity of Missouri,\nColumbia, Mo.\nDear Dr. Schlundt:\nOur plans for conducting the tests\non the five girls have been changed, and at present\nFebruary 19th, has been set as the day on which we\nwill begin this work.\nThere is still some question as to\nexactly when it would be possible to examine Mrs. Mae\nCubberley Canfield. As I understand the situation\nMr. Berry has requested that Mr. Markley and Mr. Smith\nhave authorization from the Court for a date, and\nthat will come up for a hearing next Monday, February\n11th. We are hoping that the Judge will set either\nFriday the 15th or the next week as the time for this\nexamination, so that you may complete both tasks while\nyou are here.\nAt present your presence will be\nrequired on the 19th of February, and I would suggest\nthat you be available on the 18th, to discuss with\nDr. Failla your plans.\nOn Monday of next week we hope to have\nmore information regarding Mrs. Canfield, and I will\nadvise you immediately.\nI hope that this change will not\nmaterially inconvenience you.\nReferring to your letter of January\n22nd and February 1st, suggesting corrections on our\npaper: I must advise that I have not as yet received\nthe proofs. I had hoped that the article would appear\nin the February issue, but apparently it will be March\nat the earliest, or possibly April. The article on\nthe Examination of the Post Mortem specimens of Leman\nappeared in the January issue.\nVery truly yours,\nHHBarker:RH\nVice President."
}