Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 4
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
-2-
presented in the report. Even granting that all cases reported are authentic, the
report states that the injury was caused by the practice of pointing brushes with
the lips. The report further states that this practice was abandoned in 1925, which
we know to be a fact.
For the past tiro or three years some of the best medical, chemical and
physical brains in the country have been devoting a great deal of time to the study
of this question and, have made numerous recommendations for the elimination of
possible hazards. If certain practices of the past, which may have caused injury,
have been abandoned and new methods adopted under the suggestion of those best
qualified to recommend, it would seem as if an industry as honorable and as important
as that of luminous material should be permitted to live without undue harassing.
There are many naterials used in industries in this country that are of a
decidedly injurious nature if not properly handles, such as phosphorous, tetra-ethyl
lead, fire works, cyanide of pottassium, etc.
This question of "radium poisoning" has monopolized the press from time to
time for the past two or three years. The agitation was originally started by
a
clever attorney who succeeded in getting the five radium cases on a contingent basis.
Information was very generously distributed and, we are sorry to say that most of
it was misleading and unture. However, the general subject made a human appeal,
and knowing what we would be up against we could see no advantage in being drawn into
a
controversy through the press. Doctors and so called "Radium Experts", vied with
each other in gaining notoriety and, the general public, which is poorly versed in
the knowledge of radium, was mislead. The five "radium victims", so often r ferred
to, are still living and will probably continue to do 30 for a good many years, and
this in spite of affidavits and testimony by "Radium Experts" that in all probability
they would be dead by last September.
We expect further publicity on this subject, because the same general group
that had the five original cases titaling $1,350,000 against us - at the present time
have also filed against us three (3) suits $1,150,000 and, the article in
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- faa662fcc7368f2a
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75724449
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75724449",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Julian S. Mason, July 29, 1929",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 4,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75724449",
"label": "Letters Sent to Julian S. Mason, July 29, 1929",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75724449",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Julian S. Mason, July 29, 1929",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 4,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449",
"naId": 75724449,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_2.jpg",
"mediaId": "faa662fcc7368f2a",
"ocrText": "-2-\npresented in the report. Even granting that all cases reported are authentic, the\nreport states that the injury was caused by the practice of pointing brushes with\nthe lips. The report further states that this practice was abandoned in 1925, which\nwe know to be a fact.\nFor the past tiro or three years some of the best medical, chemical and\nphysical brains in the country have been devoting a great deal of time to the study\nof this question and, have made numerous recommendations for the elimination of\npossible hazards. If certain practices of the past, which may have caused injury,\nhave been abandoned and new methods adopted under the suggestion of those best\nqualified to recommend, it would seem as if an industry as honorable and as important\nas that of luminous material should be permitted to live without undue harassing.\nThere are many naterials used in industries in this country that are of a\ndecidedly injurious nature if not properly handles, such as phosphorous, tetra-ethyl\nlead, fire works, cyanide of pottassium, etc.\nThis question of \"radium poisoning\" has monopolized the press from time to\ntime for the past two or three years. The agitation was originally started by\na\nclever attorney who succeeded in getting the five radium cases on a contingent basis.\nInformation was very generously distributed and, we are sorry to say that most of\nit was misleading and unture. However, the general subject made a human appeal,\nand knowing what we would be up against we could see no advantage in being drawn into\na\ncontroversy through the press. Doctors and so called \"Radium Experts\", vied with\neach other in gaining notoriety and, the general public, which is poorly versed in\nthe knowledge of radium, was mislead. The five \"radium victims\", so often r ferred\nto, are still living and will probably continue to do 30 for a good many years, and\nthis in spite of affidavits and testimony by \"Radium Experts\" that in all probability\nthey would be dead by last September.\nWe expect further publicity on this subject, because the same general group\nthat had the five original cases titaling $1,350,000 against us - at the present time\nhave also filed against us three (3) suits $1,150,000 and, the article in"
}