Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 4
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

-2- presented in the report. Even granting that all cases reported are authentic, the report states that the injury was caused by the practice of pointing brushes with the lips. The report further states that this practice was abandoned in 1925, which we know to be a fact. For the past tiro or three years some of the best medical, chemical and physical brains in the country have been devoting a great deal of time to the study of this question and, have made numerous recommendations for the elimination of possible hazards. If certain practices of the past, which may have caused injury, have been abandoned and new methods adopted under the suggestion of those best qualified to recommend, it would seem as if an industry as honorable and as important as that of luminous material should be permitted to live without undue harassing. There are many naterials used in industries in this country that are of a decidedly injurious nature if not properly handles, such as phosphorous, tetra-ethyl lead, fire works, cyanide of pottassium, etc. This question of "radium poisoning" has monopolized the press from time to time for the past two or three years. The agitation was originally started by a clever attorney who succeeded in getting the five radium cases on a contingent basis. Information was very generously distributed and, we are sorry to say that most of it was misleading and unture. However, the general subject made a human appeal, and knowing what we would be up against we could see no advantage in being drawn into a controversy through the press. Doctors and so called "Radium Experts", vied with each other in gaining notoriety and, the general public, which is poorly versed in the knowledge of radium, was mislead. The five "radium victims", so often r ferred to, are still living and will probably continue to do 30 for a good many years, and this in spite of affidavits and testimony by "Radium Experts" that in all probability they would be dead by last September. We expect further publicity on this subject, because the same general group that had the five original cases titaling $1,350,000 against us - at the present time have also filed against us three (3) suits $1,150,000 and, the article in

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
faa662fcc7368f2a
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75724449
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75724449",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Sent to Julian S. Mason, July 29, 1929",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 4,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75724449",
    "label": "Letters Sent to Julian S. Mason, July 29, 1929",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75724449",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Sent to Julian S. Mason, July 29, 1929",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 4,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724449",
    "naId": 75724449,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001833_Page_2.jpg",
    "mediaId": "faa662fcc7368f2a",
    "ocrText": "-2-\npresented in the report. Even granting that all cases reported are authentic, the\nreport states that the injury was caused by the practice of pointing brushes with\nthe lips. The report further states that this practice was abandoned in 1925, which\nwe know to be a fact.\nFor the past tiro or three years some of the best medical, chemical and\nphysical brains in the country have been devoting a great deal of time to the study\nof this question and, have made numerous recommendations for the elimination of\npossible hazards. If certain practices of the past, which may have caused injury,\nhave been abandoned and new methods adopted under the suggestion of those best\nqualified to recommend, it would seem as if an industry as honorable and as important\nas that of luminous material should be permitted to live without undue harassing.\nThere are many naterials used in industries in this country that are of a\ndecidedly injurious nature if not properly handles, such as phosphorous, tetra-ethyl\nlead, fire works, cyanide of pottassium, etc.\nThis question of \"radium poisoning\" has monopolized the press from time to\ntime for the past two or three years. The agitation was originally started by\na\nclever attorney who succeeded in getting the five radium cases on a contingent basis.\nInformation was very generously distributed and, we are sorry to say that most of\nit was misleading and unture. However, the general subject made a human appeal,\nand knowing what we would be up against we could see no advantage in being drawn into\na\ncontroversy through the press. Doctors and so called \"Radium Experts\", vied with\neach other in gaining notoriety and, the general public, which is poorly versed in\nthe knowledge of radium, was mislead. The five \"radium victims\", so often r ferred\nto, are still living and will probably continue to do 30 for a good many years, and\nthis in spite of affidavits and testimony by \"Radium Experts\" that in all probability\nthey would be dead by last September.\nWe expect further publicity on this subject, because the same general group\nthat had the five original cases titaling $1,350,000 against us - at the present time\nhave also filed against us three (3) suits $1,150,000 and, the article in"
}