Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
75725284
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2April 15th,1930.
Dr. Herman Schlundt,
University of Missouri,
Columbia, Mo.
Dear Dr. Schlundt:
Just a line to advise you that your air mail
letter, postmarked April 13th, 3 P.M., was delivered to us at
10:30 this morning, April 15th. The time consumed therefore
being approximately 435 hours, while the time consumed for my air
mail letter, postmarked April llth, 7 P.U. was only 22 hours.
There is apparently a difference here which is
quite impossible to explain. In order to verify the time of delivery
of air mail vs regular mail, you might check the time which this letter
is receifed to compare the time consumed for air mail and regular mail.
It is possible that your letter was mailed at a time when it had to 1dy
in the Columbia post office nearly 24 hours before going out.
Fortunately we here in New York have two air mail collections daily,
while you probably have only one.
The discrepancy with regard to the samples seems
to be quite well cleared up and we are in accord.
Yesterday I received additional samples from Mr.
Lee, and I find none of them to be radioactive.
I don't believe that these samples were tampered with.
I
have often found that a lump will give a greater discharge in the
electroscope than the ground sample from the some lump, but this I
ascribe to the fact that when you introduce a lump into the electroscope
you shorten the distance between the plate and the electro, thereby
increasing the capacity.
The ore samples which you forwarded were received
yesterday, Monday the 14th.
Sincerely yours,
HRBarker:RH
Vice President.
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to