Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
75726493
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3Columbia. mo. may 30, 1931.
my dear your Howard special came about an hour ago. d shall the take
questions submit. I sent you full were report
a few minutes before bed time to answer the some of
I including hope it reached you to day. dt will prove attention engrossing
you tables within an hour after your came
the usual sabbath attention, to your flowers
reading and will keep you from giving and
lawn. It seems to me it would be haz ardous and underside
it would kill my standing with the Health cent Service, act
to circulate the report among the clock companies, for
and would doubtless close this avenue of note
to Dr Leake will accomplish something. you
in the future. I am loping that the enclosed when
return the report to me please make comments on
marked passages which you find are open to crit-
icism, and I shall give same careful consideration
in formulating my suggestions to Dr Leake Judging its
from Dr L's letter of transmittal the report has reached
finished form andis practically in press.
the subjects employed since 1926 are grouped sep-
arately in one of the tables and here the trend of the
in the years 1918 to 1926 This raises the question
gain in radioactivity appears to be fully as fast as
at once whether or not the licking of brushes was
the main factor in radium poisoning. The omession
of girls froner those examined who left the work or who
died may depress the clerve unduly for the long time
workers as you point out
The
data
obtained
by
Knowles
and
his
associates.
address
edly oactive under present operation. with the exception of
show that the workers gradually become radi
small, and the activity of the group as a whole not alarming
a few aporadic cases of high activity, the rate of increase is
if my memory serves me night This should be
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to