Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
-2-
was subsequent to 1926 only, and they furthermore brought in a number of
girls who were not employed in the industry at the present time - the only
time they were employed was prior to 1926.
Let me again state that it is my firm conviction that the Clock
Companies are interested in the situation as it now exists, for we are all
agreed that in the past there was undue exposure. The fact that some girls who
were employed prior to 1926 show the presence of radioactive materials in
their system does not contribute anything to the condition of the industry as
now conducted. If the Dept. of Public Health, desires to conduct a survey
of the industry as a whole, then in ay opinion they are entitled to treat the
group as a unit, but when they attempt to determine whether or not the industry
is hazardous as now conducted from the determinations of radioactive materials
accumulated in the system, then they must confine their data to girls employed
after 1926.
While the insert on graph 12 depicts the conditions found among the
girls subsequent to 1926, still when we analyse this graph as compared with the
major graph in this table, we nota that girls employed since 1926, as a group,
are storing radium in their -ystem at a faster rate than girls employed during
the entire period - which I don't believe to be a fact. Dr. Thompson rather
emphatically stated, that he personally did not believe that such a picture
represented the true facts.
I quite agree with you that a careful analysis of the report fails to
prove convincingly thet the industry as now conducted is hazardous - However,
I take the position that there are few people capable of reading and properly
interpreting this report, and that there are innumerable instances in the
report where a part of the data or graphs could be segregated from the report
and quite grossly misinterpreted. It is things of this nature which we are
primarily interested in eliminating.
Dr. Leake* summary of the report, at Philadelphia, is eminently fair
in Ky opinion, and a final report based along the lines of this review would
present the conditions as they exist.
Unfortunately the Clock Companies have taken a very antagonistic
attitude toward the work of the Dept. of Health due to the nis-statement of
facts in the report as to conditions in the clock companies. In my opinion
some of these mis-statements are trivial in nature, but severtheless they
serve to shake the faith of the Clock Companies.
While we have teken rather a strong position regarding the interpre-
tation of the data, nevertheless, I am disposed to support the Department of
Public health in their troubles with the Clock Companies. I am of the
opinion that a round-table discussion in the near future with the Clock
Companies and the Dept. of Health will ajust these differences, and there
will be no further trouble.
Sincero ly yours,
HHBarker: :RH
Vice President.
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 314fafb2ace6ed16
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75726586
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75726586",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Dr. Herman Schlundt, June 22, 1931",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75726586",
"label": "Letters Sent to Dr. Herman Schlundt, June 22, 1931",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75726586",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Dr. Herman Schlundt, June 22, 1931",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586",
"naId": 75726586,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_2.jpg",
"mediaId": "314fafb2ace6ed16",
"ocrText": "-2-\nwas subsequent to 1926 only, and they furthermore brought in a number of\ngirls who were not employed in the industry at the present time - the only\ntime they were employed was prior to 1926.\nLet me again state that it is my firm conviction that the Clock\nCompanies are interested in the situation as it now exists, for we are all\nagreed that in the past there was undue exposure. The fact that some girls who\nwere employed prior to 1926 show the presence of radioactive materials in\ntheir system does not contribute anything to the condition of the industry as\nnow conducted. If the Dept. of Public Health, desires to conduct a survey\nof the industry as a whole, then in ay opinion they are entitled to treat the\ngroup as a unit, but when they attempt to determine whether or not the industry\nis hazardous as now conducted from the determinations of radioactive materials\naccumulated in the system, then they must confine their data to girls employed\nafter 1926.\nWhile the insert on graph 12 depicts the conditions found among the\ngirls subsequent to 1926, still when we analyse this graph as compared with the\nmajor graph in this table, we nota that girls employed since 1926, as a group,\nare storing radium in their -ystem at a faster rate than girls employed during\nthe entire period - which I don't believe to be a fact. Dr. Thompson rather\nemphatically stated, that he personally did not believe that such a picture\nrepresented the true facts.\nI quite agree with you that a careful analysis of the report fails to\nprove convincingly thet the industry as now conducted is hazardous - However,\nI take the position that there are few people capable of reading and properly\ninterpreting this report, and that there are innumerable instances in the\nreport where a part of the data or graphs could be segregated from the report\nand quite grossly misinterpreted. It is things of this nature which we are\nprimarily interested in eliminating.\nDr. Leake* summary of the report, at Philadelphia, is eminently fair\nin Ky opinion, and a final report based along the lines of this review would\npresent the conditions as they exist.\nUnfortunately the Clock Companies have taken a very antagonistic\nattitude toward the work of the Dept. of Health due to the nis-statement of\nfacts in the report as to conditions in the clock companies. In my opinion\nsome of these mis-statements are trivial in nature, but severtheless they\nserve to shake the faith of the Clock Companies.\nWhile we have teken rather a strong position regarding the interpre-\ntation of the data, nevertheless, I am disposed to support the Department of\nPublic health in their troubles with the Clock Companies. I am of the\nopinion that a round-table discussion in the near future with the Clock\nCompanies and the Dept. of Health will ajust these differences, and there\nwill be no further trouble.\nSincero ly yours,\nHHBarker: :RH\nVice President."
}