Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

-2- was subsequent to 1926 only, and they furthermore brought in a number of girls who were not employed in the industry at the present time - the only time they were employed was prior to 1926. Let me again state that it is my firm conviction that the Clock Companies are interested in the situation as it now exists, for we are all agreed that in the past there was undue exposure. The fact that some girls who were employed prior to 1926 show the presence of radioactive materials in their system does not contribute anything to the condition of the industry as now conducted. If the Dept. of Public Health, desires to conduct a survey of the industry as a whole, then in ay opinion they are entitled to treat the group as a unit, but when they attempt to determine whether or not the industry is hazardous as now conducted from the determinations of radioactive materials accumulated in the system, then they must confine their data to girls employed after 1926. While the insert on graph 12 depicts the conditions found among the girls subsequent to 1926, still when we analyse this graph as compared with the major graph in this table, we nota that girls employed since 1926, as a group, are storing radium in their -ystem at a faster rate than girls employed during the entire period - which I don't believe to be a fact. Dr. Thompson rather emphatically stated, that he personally did not believe that such a picture represented the true facts. I quite agree with you that a careful analysis of the report fails to prove convincingly thet the industry as now conducted is hazardous - However, I take the position that there are few people capable of reading and properly interpreting this report, and that there are innumerable instances in the report where a part of the data or graphs could be segregated from the report and quite grossly misinterpreted. It is things of this nature which we are primarily interested in eliminating. Dr. Leake* summary of the report, at Philadelphia, is eminently fair in Ky opinion, and a final report based along the lines of this review would present the conditions as they exist. Unfortunately the Clock Companies have taken a very antagonistic attitude toward the work of the Dept. of Health due to the nis-statement of facts in the report as to conditions in the clock companies. In my opinion some of these mis-statements are trivial in nature, but severtheless they serve to shake the faith of the Clock Companies. While we have teken rather a strong position regarding the interpre- tation of the data, nevertheless, I am disposed to support the Department of Public health in their troubles with the Clock Companies. I am of the opinion that a round-table discussion in the near future with the Clock Companies and the Dept. of Health will ajust these differences, and there will be no further trouble. Sincero ly yours, HHBarker: :RH Vice President.

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
314fafb2ace6ed16
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75726586
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75726586",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Sent to Dr. Herman Schlundt, June 22, 1931",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75726586",
    "label": "Letters Sent to Dr. Herman Schlundt, June 22, 1931",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75726586",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Sent to Dr. Herman Schlundt, June 22, 1931",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726586",
    "naId": 75726586,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002495_Page_2.jpg",
    "mediaId": "314fafb2ace6ed16",
    "ocrText": "-2-\nwas subsequent to 1926 only, and they furthermore brought in a number of\ngirls who were not employed in the industry at the present time - the only\ntime they were employed was prior to 1926.\nLet me again state that it is my firm conviction that the Clock\nCompanies are interested in the situation as it now exists, for we are all\nagreed that in the past there was undue exposure. The fact that some girls who\nwere employed prior to 1926 show the presence of radioactive materials in\ntheir system does not contribute anything to the condition of the industry as\nnow conducted. If the Dept. of Public Health, desires to conduct a survey\nof the industry as a whole, then in ay opinion they are entitled to treat the\ngroup as a unit, but when they attempt to determine whether or not the industry\nis hazardous as now conducted from the determinations of radioactive materials\naccumulated in the system, then they must confine their data to girls employed\nafter 1926.\nWhile the insert on graph 12 depicts the conditions found among the\ngirls subsequent to 1926, still when we analyse this graph as compared with the\nmajor graph in this table, we nota that girls employed since 1926, as a group,\nare storing radium in their -ystem at a faster rate than girls employed during\nthe entire period - which I don't believe to be a fact. Dr. Thompson rather\nemphatically stated, that he personally did not believe that such a picture\nrepresented the true facts.\nI quite agree with you that a careful analysis of the report fails to\nprove convincingly thet the industry as now conducted is hazardous - However,\nI take the position that there are few people capable of reading and properly\ninterpreting this report, and that there are innumerable instances in the\nreport where a part of the data or graphs could be segregated from the report\nand quite grossly misinterpreted. It is things of this nature which we are\nprimarily interested in eliminating.\nDr. Leake* summary of the report, at Philadelphia, is eminently fair\nin Ky opinion, and a final report based along the lines of this review would\npresent the conditions as they exist.\nUnfortunately the Clock Companies have taken a very antagonistic\nattitude toward the work of the Dept. of Health due to the nis-statement of\nfacts in the report as to conditions in the clock companies. In my opinion\nsome of these mis-statements are trivial in nature, but severtheless they\nserve to shake the faith of the Clock Companies.\nWhile we have teken rather a strong position regarding the interpre-\ntation of the data, nevertheless, I am disposed to support the Department of\nPublic health in their troubles with the Clock Companies. I am of the\nopinion that a round-table discussion in the near future with the Clock\nCompanies and the Dept. of Health will ajust these differences, and there\nwill be no further trouble.\nSincero ly yours,\nHHBarker: :RH\nVice President."
}