Ask the Scholar

Page 11 of 30
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 11

OCR

The defendant instigated the Investigations and evidenced a willingness to cooporate in then, demonstrating its effort to determine the cause of the harmful effect upon its workers as soon as its attention was directed thereto and there is no suspicion upon which the court my rest to charge it with having knowledge or such causo or that it should, prior to 1924, have had such knowledge. There is no better way to illustrate that conclusion than to turn briefly to the defendant's case. The defendant contenda that up until the year 1924 it dia not know and cannot be charged with the knowledge that it was dangerous for the dial peinters to ingest the possible maximum amount of radium in the paint into their systems in the course of their work. Its contention is based on the assumption that the decedent might have ingested 43 micrograms of radium sulphate daily for 51 days a week for a period of a year and a half. That amount is a considerably larger figure than that on which the plaintiff in- mists. The defendent suggests it because Dr. Martlond once stated that this was the maximun amount according to his estimate. AB a matter of fact, it is evident that a far smaller quantity was taken into the systen. Bach worker painted 24 dials, each dial having 14 figures, with a grom or less of paint. There are in 28.54 grems/an ounce and the several grades of paint used contain- ed 1 part or radium to 30,000 to 120,000 parts or zine sulphide. Agreat number or considerstions enter into any approximation of the amount or paint ingested and all of them tend to lessen the amount suggested by the defendent or calculated by the plaintiff. Dr. Lind testified that in his opinion of 1920 no harmful effects vere to be expected from dinl painting under the circum stanees and the length of time that the decedent workod. He further testified thet the literature or that time had nothing

Page data

Page
11
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
bcf34c58427000ed
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75729134
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75729134",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729134",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Deposition, December 17, 1935",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729134",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003274_Page_01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003274_Page_01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003274_Page_01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 30,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75729134",
    "label": "Deposition, December 17, 1935",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729134"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75729134",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729134",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Deposition, December 17, 1935",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729134",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003274_Page_01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003274_Page_01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003274_Page_01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 30,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729134",
    "naId": 75729134,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 11,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003274_Page_11.jpg",
    "mediaId": "bcf34c58427000ed",
    "ocrText": "The defendant instigated the Investigations and evidenced a\nwillingness to cooporate in then, demonstrating its effort\nto determine the cause of the harmful effect upon its workers\nas soon as its attention was directed thereto and there is no\nsuspicion upon which the court my rest to charge it with having\nknowledge or such causo or that it should, prior to 1924, have had\nsuch knowledge.\nThere is no better way to illustrate that conclusion than to\nturn briefly to the defendant's case.\nThe defendant contenda that up until the year 1924 it dia\nnot know and cannot be charged with the knowledge that it was\ndangerous for the dial peinters to ingest the possible maximum\namount of radium in the paint into their systems in the course\nof their work.\nIts contention is based on the assumption that the decedent\nmight have ingested 43 micrograms of radium sulphate daily for\n51 days a week for a period of a year and a half. That amount is\na considerably larger figure than that on which the plaintiff in-\nmists. The defendent suggests it because Dr. Martlond once stated\nthat this was the maximun amount according to his estimate.\nAB a matter of fact, it is evident that a far smaller quantity\nwas taken into the systen. Bach worker painted 24 dials, each\ndial having 14 figures, with a grom or less of paint. There are\nin\n28.54 grems/an ounce and the several grades of paint used contain-\ned 1 part or radium to 30,000 to 120,000 parts or zine sulphide.\nAgreat number or considerstions enter into any approximation of\nthe amount or paint ingested and all of them tend to lessen the\namount suggested by the defendent or calculated by the plaintiff.\nDr. Lind testified that in his opinion of 1920 no harmful\neffects vere to be expected from dinl painting under the circum\nstanees and the length of time that the decedent workod. He\nfurther testified thet the literature or that time had nothing"
}