Ask the Scholar
Page 15 of 17
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
-15-
APPRENTICES:
While a distinction between apprentices and learners
is generally recognized and while one of the manufacturers of
aircraft engines drew a distinction between the two groups
(R 58-60), apprentices in the aircraft industry are small in
number. The Board is of the opinion that no separate pro-
vision should be made for apprentices and that they should be
comprehended within the 15% tolerance recommended for learners.
HANDICAPPED AND SUPERAMNUATED WORKERS:
The Board finds no evidence to indicate noed for
any special provision for handicapped and supcronnuated
workers. The only evidence received was that no wage dis-
tinction is made betweon such workors and normal employees
(R 114).
OCCUPATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS:
The Board was unable to take into nccount occupational
classifications in its search for the provailing minimum wage
since the Aeronautical Chamber of Commerce was unable, because
of the groat diversity of occupational designations and lack
of uniformity of occupational clnssifications in the industry,
to present wage tables broken down by occupations (Exhibit F,
p. 2 and R 25, 39, 83).
RECOMMENDATION
Upon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact,
the Board respoctfully rocommends to the Secretary of Labor
that the minimum wages for employees engaged in the performance
Page data
- Page
- 15
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 9b4fb0a25222a80d
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75729537
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75729537",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729537",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, April 5, 1938",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729537",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003384_Page_01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003384_Page_01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003384_Page_01.jpg",
"imageCount": 17,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75729537",
"label": "Report, April 5, 1938",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729537"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75729537",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729537",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, April 5, 1938",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729537",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003384_Page_01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003384_Page_01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003384_Page_01.jpg",
"imageCount": 17,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729537",
"naId": 75729537,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 15,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003384_Page_15.jpg",
"mediaId": "9b4fb0a25222a80d",
"ocrText": "-15-\nAPPRENTICES:\nWhile a distinction between apprentices and learners\nis generally recognized and while one of the manufacturers of\naircraft engines drew a distinction between the two groups\n(R 58-60), apprentices in the aircraft industry are small in\nnumber. The Board is of the opinion that no separate pro-\nvision should be made for apprentices and that they should be\ncomprehended within the 15% tolerance recommended for learners.\nHANDICAPPED AND SUPERAMNUATED WORKERS:\nThe Board finds no evidence to indicate noed for\nany special provision for handicapped and supcronnuated\nworkers. The only evidence received was that no wage dis-\ntinction is made betweon such workors and normal employees\n(R 114).\nOCCUPATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS:\nThe Board was unable to take into nccount occupational\nclassifications in its search for the provailing minimum wage\nsince the Aeronautical Chamber of Commerce was unable, because\nof the groat diversity of occupational designations and lack\nof uniformity of occupational clnssifications in the industry,\nto present wage tables broken down by occupations (Exhibit F,\np. 2 and R 25, 39, 83).\nRECOMMENDATION\nUpon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact,\nthe Board respoctfully rocommends to the Secretary of Labor\nthat the minimum wages for employees engaged in the performance"
}