Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
75729879
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Columbia Unibersity
College of Physicians and Gurgeons
DE LAMAR INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH
600 WEST 168TH STREET, NEW YORK
32
DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
October 21, 1943
Mr. C. Lee,
United States Radium Corp.
535 Pearl Street,
New York City, N.Y.
OCT 23 1943
Dear Mr. Lee:
Because of the new code for luminous dial
painters I feel that it will be better for me to with-
draw from making radium determinations. It will be
necessary for me to get the approval of the Commissioner.
This might cause a lot of complication and he would
probably want to get Dr. Evans's approval of the method.
I have just received a letter from Dr. Curtiss
in which he said he doubts if my method is sensitive
enough to make the required determinations He said he
has found 10 percent of his examinations showed a con-
siderable increase over the toleration. He has heard
that I have never found over 10-11 which confirms his
belief.
Personally I think that the reason these
e
amounts are above the toleration limit is because of
inhaled dust. I think your plant does not have the
quantity of dust in the method of handling that other
plants may have. The record I have seen of Evans's
tests indicate this. The decay products of radon do
not give off any gas in the expired air.
One cannot get a linear electrometer at this
time.
In as much as I expect to retire in a year
you might just as well make the arrangements necessary
to have this work done. We can continue to make the
physical examinations and even might collect the expired
air for the radium test and ship it if you so desire.
Yours very truly,
Gredericb B.Fling
N.D.
Frederick B. Flinn
Director of Industrial Hygiene.
FBF: GD
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to