Ask the Scholar

Page 13 of 20
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 13

OCR

Page 13 - We may be able to prove by her testimony that the complainants knew of the cause of their condition long before they claim Drs. Martland, Taylor and Humphries told them. If the complainants did not know, why did Hofiman call it Radinm-esothoriua necrosis dif May 1925. If they did not lon why did the Consumers League send out literature on the subject attributing the cause to Radimm? 31. Dr. Frederick L. Hoffman's statistical investigation of those engaged in the applica- tion of luminous material was very limited, and not sufficiently bromint to true conclusions regarding the industry as a whole. In order to have made a thorough survey of this subject Dr. Hoffman should have obtained data from other plants in this country engaged in the application of luminous material, as well as abroad. Dr. Hoffman's investigation apparently consisted of interviewing a few girls that had been employed by us, and Dectors and Dentists treating them,who for some reason unknown to us, attributed their condition to radim. It should be detroloped that the Doctors and Dentists, whom Dr. Hoffmen interviewed, must have intimated to him that their condition could be ascribed to radium, otherwise there was no justification for his making such an assumption. In the event thet Doctors and Dentists so advised Dr. Hoffman, ie it not probable that their patients were aware of their condition? Dr. Hoffman's paper was read in May 1925, and priorrto that time he must have talkted with Drs. Martland and Kneff as well as Miss Wiley. that It would seem that there is a possibility sone of the complainants knew of their condition at a date earlier than what they claim on this basis. Furthermore it is possible that the girls had more in common than their occupation, as claimed by Dr. Hoffman, for instance Itre. McDonald and Mrs. Larice are sisters of Niss Magila, who died in 1922, and whose death certificate showed sphyilis as a contributing cause. It was not infrequent that one girl used the brush of mother. Drs. Hoffman, Ineff,Flinn and Miss Wiley. 32. Have no knowledge as to what Dr. Drinker may have written to the N.J. Department of Labor. Can Brink out on cross examination, as it may show methical conduct on Drinker's part. 33. We first sent to the Department of Labor, soon after receipt from Drinker, the result of the examination of our employees. Later we sent a further pertion of the Drinker report. This did not exonerate us or condem us. The Department sam a complete

Page data

Page
13
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
d127395e358e8d5e
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75730723
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75730723",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Medical Record, no date",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 20,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75730723",
    "label": "Medical Record, no date",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75730723",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Medical Record, no date",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 20,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723",
    "naId": 75730723,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 13,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_13.jpg",
    "mediaId": "d127395e358e8d5e",
    "ocrText": "Page 13 -\nWe may be able to prove by her testimony that the complainants knew of the cause of\ntheir condition long before they claim Drs. Martland, Taylor and Humphries told them.\nIf the complainants did not know, why did Hofiman call it Radinm-esothoriua necrosis\ndif\nMay 1925. If they did not lon why did the Consumers League send out literature\non the subject attributing the cause to Radimm?\n31. Dr. Frederick L. Hoffman's statistical investigation of those engaged in the applica-\ntion of luminous material was very limited, and not sufficiently bromint to true\nconclusions regarding the industry as a whole.\nIn order to have made a thorough\nsurvey of this subject Dr. Hoffman should have obtained data from other plants in\nthis country engaged in the application of luminous material, as well as abroad.\nDr. Hoffman's investigation apparently consisted of interviewing a few girls that\nhad been employed by us, and Dectors and Dentists treating them,who for some\nreason unknown to us, attributed their condition to radim. It should be detroloped\nthat the Doctors and Dentists, whom Dr. Hoffmen interviewed, must have intimated\nto him that their condition could be ascribed to radium, otherwise there was no\njustification for his making such an assumption. In the event thet Doctors and\nDentists so advised Dr. Hoffman, ie it not probable that their patients were aware\nof their condition? Dr. Hoffman's paper was read in May 1925, and priorrto that\ntime he must have talkted with Drs. Martland and Kneff as well as Miss Wiley.\nthat\nIt\nwould seem that there is a possibility sone of the complainants knew\nof their condition at a date earlier than what they claim on this basis.\nFurthermore it is possible that the girls had more in common than their occupation,\nas claimed by Dr. Hoffman, for instance Itre. McDonald and Mrs. Larice are sisters\nof Niss Magila, who died in 1922, and whose death certificate showed sphyilis as\na contributing cause. It was not infrequent that one girl used the brush of mother.\nDrs. Hoffman, Ineff,Flinn and Miss Wiley.\n32. Have no knowledge as to what Dr. Drinker may have written to the N.J. Department of\nLabor.\nCan Brink out on cross examination, as it may show methical conduct on\nDrinker's part.\n33. We first sent to the Department of Labor, soon after receipt from Drinker, the result\nof the examination of our employees. Later we sent a further pertion of the Drinker\nreport. This did not exonerate us or condem us. The Department sam a complete"
}