Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
120358474
label
[Georgia Pacific Corporation] [Loose]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
120358474
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
42-t-7432005-20120769F-Seg1-015-006-2017
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
b17d5384ebee280a
ocrText
FOIA Number: 2012-0769-F FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the William J. Clinton Presidential Library Staff. Collection/Record Group: Clinton Presidential Records Subgroup/Office of Origin: Council on Environmental Quality Series/Staff Member: Kathleen (Katie) McGinty Subseries: OA/ID Number: 17806 FolderID: Folder Title: [Georgia-Pacific Corporation] [Loose] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: S 61 5 4 2 John M. Turner Corporate Director, Government Affairs Georgia-Pacific Corporation 1875 Eye Street, N.W., #775 Washington, DC 20006 Direct: (202) 828-9629 Switchboard: (202) 659-3600 FAX: (202) 223-1398 ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT/FOREST HEALTH G-P Position for a Solution G-P supports an ecosystem management plan in the Northwest that includes all federal lands not Congressionally set aside for other purposes. Ecosystem management should allow for harvesting within merchantable stands over the entire landscape while guaranteeing the protection of fish and wildlife habitat and other public resources. Untouched forest areas (the true virgin "old-growth" forests) defined as having a stand age greater than 200 years with no previous harvesting history should be managed to minimize, to the maximum extent practicable, threats of fire, disease and insect infestations. Second-growth forests that reach 200 years of age should remain in the ecosystem management plan and continue to be available for harvesting. Private lands, including adjacent and in-holdings, should be managed for needed fiber with environmental impacts minimized to the extent practicable. G-P supports an emergency action provision in the Administration's plan to salvage dead and dying timber in the Northwest. Failing to salvage this timber poses a threat to the long-term health of the forests including the threat of wildfire to public and private forests, fish and wildlife habitat, and forest communities. This would have an immediate, beneficial effect on timber availability. During the last 50 years, U.S. forest policy substantially reduced the threat of fire in our forests. The failure to salvage dead and dying timber increases the fuel load in forests significantly above normal, background levels. This increased fuel load on public land puts adjacent private lands at risk. It also reverses, in effect, the fire protection policy that has reduced annual Northwest losses to wildfire from 30 to 50 million acres per year in the 1930's to less than 5 million acres in recent years. An increased fuel load also threatens the very habitat the wildlife federal policy seeks to protect. SUPPORTING POINTS: * G-P owns 120,000 acres of fee timberland on the northern Oregon coast and 170,000 acres of fee timberland on the southern Oregon coast, both of which have common boundaries with federal timberland. In California, 190,000 acres of timberland are owned in fee on the northern coast with an additional 125,000 acres in the Sierra mountain range. The Sierra timberlands have common boundaries with federal timberland. These timberlands support G-P manufacturing facilities. Federal ecosystem plans must recognize the role of private lands in timber management. * Ecosystem management is a natural resource management system designed to maintain or enhance ecosystem health and productivity while producing essential commodities and other values to meet human needs and desires within the limits of acceptable social, economic, and biological limits. Proper ecosystem management will foster forest health. * A strong salvage program would provide an excellent start toward a healthy ecosystem. Increased fuel loading caused by years of drought and insect damage eventually will lead to major conflagrations if an aggressive salvage program is not pursued. The great amount of G-P timberland that is adjacent to federal lands is a cause for great concern in this regard. * Due to fire, insects and disease, and weather events, natural ecosystems consist of timber stands of all ages. A good management plan that includes a variety of silvicultural techniques can mimic these situations without the catastrophic events that destroy timber, fish and wildlife habitat and water quality. The federal land base offers a tremendous opportunity to manage on an ecosystem basis. Once a desired forest condition has been defined on a local basis, commodity output targets, land allocations and management constraints can be evaluated. Ecosystem management must be technically, economically, politically and socially acceptable. Once implemented, the economic health and vigor of local dependent communities will be strengthened. G-P will require some federal timber to supplement its forest base for the continued operation of G-P manufacturing facilities in the Northwest. * Ecosystem management should apply to all non-congressionally set-aside federal lands. Single species and single-use management schemes (other than those congressionally set-aside) have no place in ecosystem management planning. Private landowners should retain the option of utilizing ecosystem management techniques if so desired. However, there must be a recognition that private timberlands should remain available for needed fiber production, consistent with state and federal law. Minimizing the impacts of protection and recovery of threatened and endangered species should allow private lands to fill the gap in federal timber supply. A COMPARISON OF THE ISC REPORT AND THE OCCURENCE OF THE NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL IN A MANAGED SECOND-GROWTH REDWOOD FOREST. GEORGIA - PACIFIC CORPORATION, FORT BRAGG, CALIFORNIA. 1992. ISC Report - Assumption for a viable population Georgia - Pacific Corporation lands of Northern Spotted Owls. Fort Bragg, California (Thomas et al., 1990) approximately 200,000 acres 0.11 owis/mi² 0.42 owis/mi² (1992 inventory sites only) 1 mi² = 640 acres 200,000 acres / 640 acres = 312.5 mi² 131 individual owls in 312.5 mi² = 0.4192 owls/mi² 2 owl pairs/township 6.91 owl pairs/township (1992 inventory) 1 Township = 23040 acres 200,000 acres / 23040 acres = 8.68 townships 60 owl pairs (1992)/ 8.68 = 6.91 prs./town. Thomas, J.W., E.D. Forsman, J.B. Lint, E.C. Meslow, B.R. Noon, and J. Verner. 1990. A Conservation Strategy for the Northern Spotted Owl. Interagency Scientific Committee to Address the Conservation of the Northern Spotted Owl. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; and U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Portland, OR. 1989-1992 SPOTTED OWL RESEARCH GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP. 80 78 70 60 54 60 40 36 30 20 9 10 0 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 KNOWN SPOTT ED OWL LOCATIONS ON GEORGIA-PACIFIC LANDS NEAR FORT BRAGG. CA 1989-1992 SPOTTED OWL RESEARCH GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP. 60 60 49 50 40 30 27 20 10 6 0 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 NUMBER OF KNOWN SPOTTED OWL PAIRS OCCUPYING SITES ON GEORGIA-PACIRC LANDS. 1989-1992 SPOTTED OWL RESEARCH GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP. 40 37 36 30 24 26 18 20 15 10 2 5 0 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 THE NUMBER OF KNOWN SPOTTED OWL NEST SITES OCCURING ON GEORGIA-PACIRC LANDS NEAR FORT BRAGG. CA 1989-1992 SPOTTED OWL RESEARCH GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP. 39 40 36 30 26 23 22 20 15 10 5 3 0 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 THE NUMBER OF KNOWN YOUNG PRODUCED FROM SUCCESSFUL SPOTTED OWL NEST ON GEORGIA - PACIFIC CORP. LANDS NEAR FORT BRAGG. CA 1989-1992 SPOTTED OWL RESEARCH GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP. 0.86 0.9 0.65 0.8 0.7 0.50 0.46 06 0.5 0.4 03 02 0.1 0 1989 1990 1991 1992 NUMBER OF YOUNG PRODUCED PER KNOWN PAIR OF SPOTTED OWLS ON GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION LANDS NEAR FORT BRAGG. CA 1989-1992 SPOTTED OWL RESEARCH GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP. 16 1.50 1.4 1.22 12 0.96 1.06 1 08 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1989 1990 1991 1992 THE NUMBER OF YOUNG PRODUCED PER NEST ON GEORGIAPACIFIC CORPORATION LANDS NEAR FORT BRAGG. CA KNOWN NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL SITES OCCURING IN MENDOCINO, NAPA, SONOMA, LAKE AND MARIN COUNTIES OF CALIFORNIA. CALIF. DEPT. OF FISH AND GAME 500 470 450 400 373 350 300 250 250 200 150 88 100 31 50 0 1977 1986 1990 1991 1992 Theodore W. Wooster, Enviromental Specialist IV. California Dept. of Fish and Game. P.O. Box 47 Yountville, CA. 94599. (707) 944-5524 Fax (707) 944-5563. Georgia-Pacific Corporation 1875 Eye Street N.W., Suite 775 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone (202) 659-3600 FAX (202) 223-1398 May 28, 1993 Mr. David Cottingham Office of Environmental Policy 306 Old Executive Office Building Washington, DC 20500 Dear David: Carl Ehlen and I appreciated the opportunity to visit with you about the Northwest Forest Plan. Attached is a series of maps of Georgia-Pacific timberlands in California and Oregon. They illustrate the concern we expressed that the ecosystem management plan for federal forest not create adverse problems for private forests. Georgia-Pacific paper and wood products operations depend on company lands for their timber supply. Access to our land and owl populations are already presenting difficulty. The California land at Ft. Bragg is 50 percent impacted by a growing owl population while the Oregon lands are affected by the mixed ownerships. As we indicated, we want to be supportive of the President's plan when it is announced. We remain confident it will be a fair and balanced plan that will recognize the role of private forests for wood and fiber production. Please feel free to contact me at 202/659-3600 if you have questions or need information. I can make our management and forestry people available to your office on short notice. Again, thank you for taking time from a hectic schedule to see us. Sincerely John M. Turner Corporate Director, Government Affairs JTM/gmb GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION COQUILLE TIMBERLANDS AND PUBLIC LANDS COOS, DOUGLAS, CURRY & JOSEPHINE COUNTIES OREGON COOS BAY PACIFIC OCEAN CAPE now ARAGO COQUILLE D D BANDON COQUILLE POINT MYRTLE de X POINT D a A B: Bast Sid c in Max GRASS WILDER MILD ROCUE PORT ORFORD MIDERNESS LEGEND GEORGIA-PACIFIC TIMBERLANDS BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT USDA, FOREST SERVICE OREGON STATE LANDS WILDERNESS & SPECIAL AREAS MAP AREA PREPARED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TIMBER INVENTORY GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION PORTLAND, OREGON MAY 24, 1993 GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION TOLEDO TIMBERLANDS AND PUBLIC LANDS TILLAMOCK, LINCOLN, BENTON, YAMHILL & POLK COUNTIES OREGON LINCOLN CITY DEPOE PACIFIC BAY OCEAN NEWPORT TOLEDO PHILOMATH 8 WALDPORT # SUSLAWA NATIONAL YACHATS LEGEND GEORGIA-PACIFIC TIMBERLANDS BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MAP AREA USDA, FOREST SERVICE STATE LANDS OREGON WILDERNESS & SPECIAL AREAS PREPARED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TIMBER INVENTORY GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION PORTLAND, OREGON MAY 24, 1993 GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION MARTELL TIMBERLANDS AND PUBLIC LANDS ELDORADO, AMADOR, CALAVARES & TUOLUMNE COUNTIES CALIFORNIA DESOLATION ELDORADO MOKELUNNE WLDERNESS AMADOR CALAVARES TUPLUMNE LEGEND GEORGIA-PACIFIC TIMBERLANDS BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MAP AREA USDA, FOREST SERVICE GP STATE LANDS WILDERNESS & SPECIAL AREAS CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TIMBER INVENTORY GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION PORTLAND, OREGON MAY 24, 1993 HUMBOLDT QOUNTY PIERCY + GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION FORT BRAGG TIMBERLANDS AND PUBLIC LANDS HUMBOLDT AND MENDOCINO COUNTIES LEGGEST CALIFORNIA 2200 ROCKPORT LAYTONVILLE MAP AREA BRANSCOMB WESTPORT PACIFIC CALIFORNIA MENDOCINO COUNTY FORT BRAGG MENDOCINO she OCEAN & LEGEND GEORGIA-PACIFIC TIMBERLANDS BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT USDA, FOREST SERVICE STATE LANDS GP WILDERNESS & SPECIAL AREAS POINT ARENA PREPARED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TIMBER INVENTORY GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION PORTLAND, OREGON MAY 24, 1993