Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
120356726
label
Budget FY [Fiscal Year] 1996 [Folder 2] [1]
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
120356726
contentType
document
title
Budget FY [Fiscal Year] 1996 [Folder 2] [1]
citationUrl
collections
Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)
Jose Cerda's Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
120356726
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
42-t-7367474-20160931S-010-007-2018
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
8f9f9d170bb677d2
ocrText
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
1$ IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-3-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
FY 1995
FY 1996
DOJ
Other Agey
PAD
PAD Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
Estimate
New
Total
FTE's
Auth.
Auth.
PREVENTION:
Model Intensive Prevention
DOJ
-
-
48.216
48.216
43.394
43.394
100.000
100.000
Ounce of Prevention Council
DOJ
2
2
7.088
14.700
14.700
3.234
3.759
15
14.700
14.700
FACES (Family & Community Endeavor Schools)
Community Schools Youth Services Grants
HHS
26
26
29.581
72.450
72.450
15.939
25.004
72.350
72.350
Family & Community Endeavor Schools Grants
DofEd
11
11
20.232
31.050
31.050
6.831
10.716
31.050
31.050
Local Crime Prevention Block Grants
DOJ
-
---
36.615
30.000
27.000
27.000
75.940
75.940
Assist for Delinq'nt & At-Risk Youth [Youth Academies]
DOJ
-
---
2.604
0.000
0.000
0.000
5.400
5.400
Local Partnership Act
HUD
--
---
130.184
270.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
270.000
270.000
Community Economic Partnership
HHS
---
---
21.697
45.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
45.000
45.000
GREAT (Gang Resistance Education & Training]
Treasury
9
9
2.989
7.200
7.200
6.048
7.488
o
7.200
7.200
Missing Alzheimer's Patients
DOJ
---
---
0.900
0.900
0.198
0.198
0.900
0.900
Urban Recreation and At-Risk Youth
DOI
---
---
1.302
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.700
2.700
Prison Drug Treatment (State)
DOJ
---
---
13.018
27.000
5.940
5.940
27.000
27.000
Prison Drug Treatment (Federal)
DOJ
---
---
13.500
13.500
10.800
10.800
13.500
13.500
Violence Against Women Act
Law Enforcement & Prosecution Grants
DOJ/HH
26
26
130.000
130.000
28.600
37.700
130.000
130.000
Rape Prevention
HHS
---
---
35,000
35.000
35.000
7.700
7.700
35.000
35.000
Runaway, Homeless, and Street Youth
HHS
---
---
7.000
7.000
7.000
1.540
1.540
7.000
7.000
Domestic Violence Hotline
HHS
1
1
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.088
0.438
0.400
0.400
Encouraging Arrest Policies
DOJ
-
-
28.000
28,000
6.160
6.160
28.000
28.000
Battered Women's Shelters
HHS
---
---
50.000
50.000
50.000
11.000
11.000
50.000
50.000
Rural Domestic Violence Enforcement
DOJ
---
---
7.000
7.000
1.540
1.540
7.000
7.000
Community Programs On Domestic Violence
HHS
---
--
4.000
4.000
4.000
0.880
0.880
4.000
4.000
Youth Education & Domestic Violence
HHS
---
---
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.088
0.088
0.400
0.400
Number & Cost of Injuries Study
HHS
---
---
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.022
0.022
0.100
0.100
Victims of Child Abuse
--
---
Court Appointed Special Advocates
OJP
--
-
6.000
6.000
1.320
1.320
6.000
6.000
Training For Judicial Personnel & Practioners
OJP
---
---
0.750
0.750
0.165
0.165
0.750
0.750
Grants For Televised Testimony
OJP
---
-
0.250
0.250
0.055
0.055
0.250
0.250
Access To Federal Criminal Information Stalker
DOJ
---
---
1.500
1.500
0.330
0.330
1.500
1.500
Family Unity - State Grants
OJP
-
---
1.562
1.562
0.344
0.344
3.240
3.240
Safety For Women Parks/Transit
Capital Improvement National Parks
DOI
-
---
10.000
10.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
10.000
10.000
Capital Improvements - Public Parks
DOI
---
---
15.000
15.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
15.000
15.000
Capital Improvements Public Transporation
DOT
-
...
10.000
10.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
10.000
10.000
Misc. Provisions (Rpts, Training, Education)
DOJ/HH
---
---
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.600
1.600
Drug Courts
DOJ
29
100
106.558
200.000
44.000
54.150
221.000
150.000
Total Prevention
104
175
741
572
717
223
258
15
1,197
1,126
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
61.9%
970
= DOJ + Higher Agency Request
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
($ IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-3-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
FY 1995
FY 1996
DOJ
Other Agey
PAD
PAD Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
Estimate
New
Total
FTE's
Auth.
Auth.
STATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Community Policing Grants
DOJ
1,300
1,332
1,882.000
1,882.000
414.040
869.040
310
1882.000
1850.000
DNA Identification (State Grants)
DOJ
---
---
0.482
0.482
0.106
0.106
1.000
1,000
Police Recruitment
DOJ
---
---
0.964
0.964
0.212
0.212
2.000
2.000
State Courts Assistance
DOJ
--
---
11.090
11.090
2.440
2.440
23.000
23.000
Technical Assistance.
DOJ
---
---
24.000
24.000
State Grants
OJP
---
---
4.822
4.822
1.061
1.061
Quantico Training/Intelligence Gathering
FBI
---
--
4.000
4.000
0.880
0.880
Techical Automation Improvement Quantico
FBI
--
---
10.000
10.000
2.200
2.200
Brady - Criminal Records Upgrade
DOJ
100
100
12.054
25,000
5.500
40.500
25.000
25.000
Community Based Prosecutors & Functions
DOJ
-
---
3.375
3.375
0.743
0.743
7.000
7.000
Rural Law Enforcement
Rural Law Enforcement Grants
DOJ
---
---
11.572
24,000
5.280
5.280
24.000
24.000
Rural Drug Enforcement Training
Treasury
--
---
0.482
1.000
1.000
0.220
0.220
1.000
1.000
Criminal Justice/Substance Abuse Training
DOJ
---
---
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.000
1.000
TB Prevention & Treatment In Correctional Institutions
DOJ
---
---
0.338
0.338
0.074
0.074
0.700
0.700
Police Corps
DOJ
---
---
9.643
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Police Corps In Service Scholarships
DOJ
---
---
9.643
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Family Support
DOJ
---
--
1.205
1.205
0.265
0.265
2.500
2.500
Byrne Grants
DOJ
450
580
260.000
260.000
57.200
214.700
260.000
130.000
Violent Repeat Offender Incarceration
DOJ
25
175
434.188
434.188
95.521
104.096
900.500
750.000
Certain Punishment for Youthful Offenders
DOJ
---
---
9.643
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Criminal Alien Incarceration
DOJ
130
130
300.000
300.000
225.000
312.100
300.000
300.000
Total State and Local Law Enforcement
2,005
2,317
2,966
1
2,991
817
1,560
310
3,514
3,201
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
84.4%
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
(# IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-3-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
FY 1995
FY 1996
DOJ
Other Agey
PAD
PAD Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
Estimate
New
Total
FTE's
Anth.
Auth.
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Treasury Authorizations
Treasury
30
70.000
70.000
70.000
58.800
58.800
351
70.300
70.000
Office of Enforcement
2.4
0.000
0.360
FinCEN
2.7
0.000
0.405
BATF
7
0.000
1.050
U.S. Customs
4
0.000
0.600
Internal Revenue Service
7
0.000
1.050
U.S. Secret Service
6.6
0.000
0.990
Justice Authorizations
DOJ
---
---
0.000
0.000
40.000
40.000
Wireless Communications
FBI
--
---
8.000
8.000
1.760
1.760
Automated Booking Stations
GA
---
---
11,000
11.000
2.420
2.420
4
Freedom of Information Automation
GA
---
---
4,500
4.500
0.990
0.990
U.S. Marshals Courthouses
USMS
---
---
16.500
16.500
3.630
3.630
40
FBI
---
---
35.000
35.000
Technical Support Center
FBI
--
---
16.100
16.100
12.880
12.880
Advanced Telephony
FBI
-
---
18.900
18.900
15.120
15.120
DEA (Annualization of 1995 Agents)
DOJ
---
---
8.035
8.035
6.428
6.428
58
12.000
12.000
Heroin Domestic Enforcement
---
---
3.965
3.965
3.172
3.172
15
US Attorneys
DOJ
---
---
5.000
5.000
4.000
4.000
5.000
5.000
SCAMS - Telemarketing Fraud (FBI/USA)
---
-
0.000
0.000
2.000
2.000
FBI Agents
FBI
-
-
0.750
0.000
0.000
0.000
U.S. Attorneys
USA
---
---
0.250
0.000
0.000
0.000
Public Awareness & Prevention
OJP
---
---
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
DOJ
---
---
1.500
1.500
1.200
1.200
1.500
1.500
Improving Border Controls
DOJ
181
228
232.000
232.000
92.800
165.200
810
232.000
185.000
Criminal Alien Tracking Center
DOJ
-
---
3.400
3.400
2.720
2.720
20
3.400
3.400
Expeditious Deportation - Asylum Reform
DOJ
49
64
84.400
84.400
67.520
74.870
754
105.000
90.000
Expanded Special Deportation
DOJ
54
55
55.000
55.000
44,000
52.100
380
55,000
54,000
DNA (FBI)
DOJ
-
---
4.600
4.600
3.680
3.680
30
5.500
5.500
Presidential Summit On Violence/Nat'l Commission
DOJ
---
---
1.000
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1.000
Anti-Gang/Drug Grants In Federally Assisted Housing
DOJ
---
-
1.000
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1.000
Family Unity Federal Prisoners
OJP
-
---
0.360
0.360
0.288
0.288
0.360
0.360
Violence Against Women
Federal Victim Counselors
USA
--
---
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.500
Training Programs
OJP
-
---
1.000
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1.000
State Databases Study
OJP
-
---
0.200
0.200
0.160
0.160
0.200
0.200
National Baseline Study on Campus Sexual Assault
OJP
-
---
0.200
0.200
0.160
0.160
0.200
0.200
The Judiciary
Judiciary
---
---
30.000
30.000
30.000
24.000
24.000
?
30.000
30.000
Training Judges/Court Personnel
Judiciary
-
---
1.300
1.300
1.300
1.040
1.040
7
1.300
1.300
Total Federal Law Enforcement
314
377
580
101
579
350
442
2,462
602
539
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
96.3%
Total Funding
2,422
2,869
4,287
675
4,287
1,390
2,260
2,787
5,313
4,866
Total Trust Fund Available
2,423
2,423
4,287
4,287
2,334
4,287
4,287
Funds Under (Over) Allocated
1
(446)
0
(0)
74
(1,026)
(579)
4,516
= DOJ + Higher Agency Request
OMB/Duke/x53451
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
16-Nov-1994 12:01pm
TO:
Kenneth L. Schwartz
FROM:
Jose Cerda, III
Domestic Policy Council
SUBJECT: Passback
Ken,
Here's the word from Carol's 10am crime meeting, which Chris was not able to
make. I'll also get Bruce or Carol to reaffirm the budget-related decisions
below:
1. Fully fund the Police Corps. Take 10 million from prisons and 10 million
from prevention.
2. Raise the overall cops authorization to 1,882 from 1,850. I know Bruce and
I said it was OK to go lower, but now cops is the strongest card we can play in
the crime game. Again, take 16 million from prevention and 16 million from
prisons. We need, however, to keep the overall prisons authorization at or
above 500 million.
3. Fully fund Byrne. In no way and I know this it tough -- can a passback
include a cut to Byrne. One of the Republican options is to replace our police
and prevention programs with huge increases to Byrne (now that they have most of
the governorships). Thus, any news that we will cut Byrne again will only
reinforce their arguement to revisit the crime bill programs. This means the
money has to come from outside the trust fund, and I don't know how we get that
done (how about those technology programs that the GOP will never fund?) If
push comes to shove on this issue, it's better to put the Byrne money back in,
cut nothing else now, and sweat the details later, than it is to send any paper
to the agencies that cuts Byrne. Ideas?
Please don't circulate this e-mail. Again, I'll speak to Bruce and Carol about
updating Chris on this immediately, butut there was wide agreement at the crime
meeting that this is how we needed to proceed for now.
Thanks,
Jose'
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
16-Nov-1994 10:52am
TO:
Jose Cerda, III
FROM:
Bruce N. Reed
Domestic Policy Council
SUBJECT: money
Thanks for the good word about cops in schools. I think a
no-parole, cop in every school message would keep us in the
ballgame for next year.
On the budget, I think we need to do two things:
1. You should call Schwartz and tell him that we want to fully
fund Police Corps. Take 10m from prevention and 10m from prisons.
2. Should we try to raise the overall cop authoriz back up to
1,882 from 1,850? Why don't you take that up with Schwartz (I
told him before it was OK to go lower, but now cops is the only
horse we have in this race)? Again, 16m from prevention and 16m
from prisons although the overall prison money should stay
at or above 500m if possible.
3. Get Carol the figures on Byrne, and ask her to call Edley and
deliver the news. The money has to come from outside the Trust
Fund, which means cutting 200m or so from any of the many commerce
and technology programs that the GOPs will never fund. She can
tell Edley that we can sweat the details later, but under no
circumstances should a passback go out without fully funding
Byrne.
Thanks. You're a friend to cops everywhere, and their love for
you should keep them in our camp.
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
Return
($ IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 11-2-94
to Jose
Crime Act Programs
Provision
FY 1995
FY 1996
DOJ
Other Agey
PAD
PAD Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
Estimate
New
Total
FTE's
Anth.
Auth.
PREVENTION:
Model Intensive Prevention
DOJ
---
---
48.216
48.216
43.394
43.394
100.000
100.000
Ounce of Prevention Council
DOJ
2
2
7.088
14.700
14.700
3.234
3.804
15
14.700
14.700
FACES (Family & Community Endeavor Schools)
Community Schools Youth Services Grants
HHS
26
26
29.581
72.450
72.450
28.980
42.189
72.350
72.350
Family & Community Endeavor Schools Grants
DofEd
11
11
20.232
31.050
31.050
6.831
11.049
31.050
31.050
Local Crime Prevention Block Grants
DOJ
-
---
36.615
30.000
27.000
27.000
75.940
75.940
Assist for Delinq'nt & At-Risk Youth [Youth Academies]
DOJ
-
---
2.604
1.604
0.353
0.353
5.400
5,400
Local Partnership Act
HUD
-
---
130.184
270.000
43,000
43.000
43.000
270.000
270.000
Community Economic Partnership
HHS
--
---
21.697
45.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
45.000
45,000
GREAT (Gang Resistance Education & Training]
Treasury
9
9
2.989
7.200
7.200
1.584
5.004
0
7.200
7.200
Missing Alzheimer's Patients
DOJ
---
-
0.900
0.900
0.198
0.198
0.900
0.900
Urban Recreation and At-Risk Youth
DOI
---
-
1.302
2.700
2.700
0.594
0.594
2.700
2.700
Prison Drug Treatment (State)
DOJ
---
-
13.018
27.000
5.940
5.940
27.000
27.000
Prison Drug Treatment (Federal)
DOJ
---
---
13.500
13.500
11.475
11.475
13.500
13.500
Violance Against Women Act
Law Enforcement & Prosecution Grants
DOJ/HH
26
26
130.000
130.000
28.600
38.480
130.000
130.000
Rape Prevention
HHS
---
---
35,000
35.000
35.000
7.700
7.700
35,000
35.000
Runaway, Homeless, and Street Youth
HHS
---
---
7.000
7.000
7.000
1.400
1.400
7.000
7.000
Domestic Violence Hotline
HHS
1
1
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.200
0.675
0.400
0.400
Bneouraging Arrest Policies
DOJ
---
--
28.000
28.000
6.160
6.160
28,000
28.000
Battered Women's Shelters
HHS
--
---
50.000
50.000
15.000
1.500
1.500
50.000
50.000
Rural Domestic Violence Enforcement
DOJ
---
---
7.000
7.000
1.540
1.540
7.000
7.000
Community Programs On Domestic Violence
HHS
---
---
4,000
4.000
4,000
0.400
0.400
4.000
4.000
Youth Education & Domestic Violence
HHS
---
--
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.060
0.060
0.400
0.400
Number & Cost of Injuries Study
HHS
---
-
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.022
0.022
0.100
0.100
Victime of Child Abuse
---
-
Court Appointed Special Advocates
OJP
---
---
6.000
6.000
1.320
1.320
6.000
6,000
Training For Judicial Personnel & Practioners
OJP
---
---
0.750
0.750
0.165
0.165
0.750
0.750
Grants For Televised Testimony
OJP
---
---
0.250
0.250
0.055
0.055
0.250
0.250
Access To Federal Criminal Information - Stalker
DOJ
---
---
1.500
1.500
0.330
0.330
1.500
1.500
Family Unity - State Grants
OJP
---
-
1.562
1.562
0.344
0.344
3.240
3.240
Safety For Women Parks/Transit
Capital Improvement National Parks
DOI
---
-
10.000
10.000
5.000
1.100
1.100
10.000
10.000
Capital Improvements - Public Parks
DOI
---
---
15.000
15.000
7,500
1.650
1.650
15.000
15.000
Capital Improvements - Public Transporation
DOT
---
---
10.000
10.000
5,000
0.250
0.250
10.000
10.000
Misc. Provisions (Rpts, Training, Education)
DOJ/HH
---
---
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.600
1.600
Drug Courts
DOJ
29
100
106.558
150,000
33.000
44.020
221.000
150.000
Total Prevention
104
175
741
575
697
258
301
15
1,197
1,126
FY96 PAD Recommendation As Portion of FY96 Authorizations
61.9%
FY96 PAD Recommendation As Portion of Available FY96 Authorizations
973
58.2%
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
($ IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 11-2-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
FY 1995
FY 1996
DOJ
Other Agey
PAD
PAD Outlays
Req. Add'l
Available
1996
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
Estimate
New
Total
FTE's
Anth.
Anth.
0.220
STATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Community Policing Grants
DOJ
1,300
1,332
1,882.000
1,850.000
407.000
901.000
310
1882.000
1850.000
DNA Identification (State Grants)
DOJ
---
---
0.482
0.482
0.106
0.106
1.000
1.000
Police Recruitment
DOJ
---
-
0.964
0.964
0.212
0.212
2.000
2.000
State Courts Assistance
DOJ
---
---
11.090
11.090
2.440
2.440
23.000
23,000
Technical Assistance
DOJ
---
---
24.000
24.000
State Grants
OJP
---
---
4.822
4.822
1.061
1.061
Quantico Training/Intelligence Gathering
FBI
---
---
4.000
4.000
0.880
0.880
Techical Automation Improvement Quantico
FBI
---
---
10.000
2.000
0.440
0.440
Brady Criminal Records Upgrade
DOJ
100
100
12.054
25.000
5.500
43.500
25.000
25.000
Community Based Prosecutors & Functions
DOJ
---
---
3.375
3.375
0.743
0.743
7,000
7.000
Rural Law Enforcement
Rural Law Enforcement Grants
DOJ
---
---
11.572
12,000
2.640
2.640
24,000
24.000
Geral Drug Enforcement Training
Treasury
---
---
0.482
1.000
1.000
0.220
0.220
1,000
1.000
Criminal Justice/Substance Abuse Training
DOJ
---
---
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1,000
1.000
TB Prevention & Treatment In Correctional Institutions
DOJ
---
---
0.200
0.200
0.044
0.044
0.700
0.700
Police Corps
DOJ
---
---
9.643
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Police Corps In Service Scholarships
DOJ
---
---
9.643
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Family Support
DOJ
---
---
1.205
1.205
0.265
0.265
2.500
2.500
Byrne Grants
DOJ
450
580
260.000
260.000
57.200
228.200
260.000
130.000
Violent Repeat Offender Incarceration
DOJ
25
175
434.188
523.191
52.319
61.629
900.500
750.000
Certain Punishment for Youthful Offenders
DOJ
---
---
9.643
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Criminal Alien Incarceration
DOJ
130
130
300.000
300.000
204.000
291.100
300.000
300.000
Total State and Local Law Enforcement
2,005
2,317
2,965
1
3,028
741
1,541
310
3,514
3,201
FY96 PAD Recommendation As Portion of FY96 Authorizations
94.6%
** Assumes 100% Of Funds Are
FY96 PAD Recommendation As Portion of Available FY96 Authorizations
86.2%
77.4322
For Prison Construction Only
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
($ IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 11-2-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
FY 1995
FY 1996
DOJ
Other Agey
PAD
PAD Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
Estimate
New
Total
FTE's
Auth.
Auth.
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Treasury Authorizations
Treasury
30
70.000
70.000
70.000
58.800
58,800
351
70.000
70.000
Office of Enforcement
2.400
0.000
0.360
FinCEN
3.000
0.000
0.450
BATF
7.110
0.000
1.067
U.S. Customs
3.890
0.000
0.584
Internal Revenue Service
7.000
0.000
1.050
U.S. Secret Service
6.600
0.000
0.990
Justice Authorizations
DOJ
---
---
0.000
0.000
40.000
40.000
Wireless Communications
FBI
---
---
8.000
2.500
0.550
0.550
Automated Booking Stations
GA
---
---
11.000
11.000
2.420
2.420
4
Freedom of Information Automation
GA
---
---
4.500
4.500
0.990
0.990
U.S. Marshals Courthouses
USMS
---
---
16.500
16.500
14.850
14.850
40
FBI
---
---
35.000
35.000
Technical Support Center
FBI
---
---
16.100
0.000
0.000
0.000
Advanced Telephony
FBI
---
---
18.900
23,500
18.800
18.800
DEA (Annualization of 1995 Agents)
DOJ
---
---
8.035
8.035
6.428
6.428
58
12.000
12.000
Heroin Domestic Enforcement
---
---
3.965
3.965
3.172
3.172
15
US Attorneys
DOJ
---
---
5.000
5.000
4.400
4.400
5.000
5,000
SCAMS Telemerketing Fraud (FBI/USA)
---
---
0.000
0.000
2.000
2.000
FBI Agents
FBI
---
---
0.750
0.000
0.000
0.000
U.S. Attorneys
USA
---
---
0.250
0.000
0.000
0.000
Public Awareness & Prevention
OJP
---
---
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
DOJ
---
---
1.500
1.500
1.200
1.200
1.500
1.500
Improving Border Controls
DOJ
181
228
232.000
232.000
153.696
187.524
810
232.000
185.000
Criminal Alien Tracking Center
DOJ
---
---
3.400
3.400
2.700
2.700
20
3.400
3.400
Expeditious Deportation Asylum Reform
DOJ
49
64
84.400
84.400
67.530
72.920
754
105.000
90.000
Expanded Special Deportation
DOJ
54
55
55.000
55.000
41.980
51.011
380
55.000
54.000
DNA (FBI)
DOJ
---
---
4.600
4.600
3.680
3.680
30
5.500
5.500
Presidential Summit On Violence/Nat'l Commission
DOJ
---
---
1.000
1.000
0.800
0.800
1,000
1.000
Anti-Gang/Drug Grants In Federally Assisted Housing
DOJ
---
---
1.000
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1.000
Family Unity Federal Prisoners
OJP
---
---
0.360
0.360
0.288
0.288
0.360
0.360
Violence Against Women
Federal Victim Counselors
USA
---
---
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.500
Training Programs
OJP
---
---
1.000
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1.000
State Databases Study
OJP
---
---
0.200
0.200
0.160
0.160
0.200
0.200
National Baseline Study on Campus Sexual Assault
OJP
---
---
0.200
0.200
0.160
0.160
0.200
0.200
The Judiciary
Judiciary
---
---
30.000
30.000
30.000
24.000
24.000
?
30.000
30.000
Training Judges/Court Personnel
Judiciary
---
---
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.700
Equal Justice For Women In Courts/Training Grants
SJI
---
---
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.480
0.480
?
1.300
1.300
Total Federal Law Enforcement
314
377
580
101
562
410
463
2,462
602
539
FY96 PAD Recommendation As Portion of FY96 Authorizations
104.3%
FY96 PAD Recommendation As Portion of Available FY96 Authoriz
93.4%
Total Funding
2,422
2,869
4,287
677
4,287
1,410
2,305
2,787
5,313
4,866
Total Trust Fund Available
2,423
2,423
4,287
4,287
2,334
4,287
4,287
Funds Under (Over) Allocated
1
(446)
0
0
29
(1,026)
(579)
OMB/Duke/x53451
DRUG CROSSCUT,
VIOLENT CRIME REDUCTION TRUST FUND,
AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
REVIEWS
October 28, 1994
BUDLET-P495 BUDGET F495 (DOJ)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGES
I.
Federal Drug Control Programs Crosscut
1-14
II.
Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund (VCRTF)
1-9
III.
Department of Justice Director's Review
1-64
Clinton Presidential Records
Digital Records Marker
This is not a presidential record. This is used as an administrative
marker by the William J. Clinton Presidential Library Staff.
This marker identifies the place of a tabbed divider. Given our
digitization capabilities, we are sometimes unable to adequately
scan such dividers. The title from the original document is
indicated below.
I
Divider Title:
Federal Drug Control Programs Cross-Cut
I.
Federal Drug Control Funding Grew $1.1 Billion In FY 1995
($ in Millions)
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
Enacted
Enacted
Agency Req
Drug Programs
$12,134
$12,299
$13,965
VCRTF - Drug Portion
967
1,227
Total Drug Funding
$12,134
$13,266
$15,192
Funding For Drug Control Programs Is In Many Cases Derived From Agency Program Totals As An Estimate
of What Portion Can Be Attributed To Drug Abuse Control. Some estimates are "hard", others are "soft".
И.
For FY 1995, Most Drug Funding Increases [Over $960M] Came From Crime Act's VCRTF:
The Administration requested $13.2 Billion in fiscal year 1995 for drug control
programs including initiatives for: Hard-Core Treatment ($355M) i School-Based
Prevention ($191M) i and International Programs ($68M). Only a small percentage of
these investments were funded. Funding changes for drug categories in FY 1995 were:
Prevention & Treatment Funding Increased $428M [or + 9%], But The
Administration's Hard Core Drug User Initiative Was Largely Unfunded.
State & Federal Law Enforcement Funding Increased $794M [or + 14%]
Interdiction & International Programs Funding Decreased $ 93M [or -6%]
III. For FY 1996, Aggregate Drug Funding Will Also Be Appreciably Raised The Drug Portion Of The
Crime Act [Over $1.2 Billion].
Drug Courts [@ $200M]
State & Federal Drug Prison Treatment [@ $46M]
Prison Grants/Boot Camp Programs [@ $107M]
Community Policing [@ $628M]
Law Enforcement Grants [@ $277M]
1
IV. For FY 1996 Drug Control Agency Requests Are $1.8 Billion Over The FY 1995 Enacted Level.
ONDCP Priorities For Funding Increases Over FY 1995 Levels Are:
Treatment & Prevention:
Hard Core Treatment - Fully fund HHS's drug treatment request (+$260M). This
request level was negotiated by ONDCP with HHS -- under the threat of an ONDDCP
"decertification" of the HHS Request -- during budget preparation. Thus, it
represents ONDCP's "de facto" drug treatment request. This treatment funding
would go to non-incarcerated addicts. Increases for prison-related drug
treatment is funded through the VCRTF (+$241M).
Prevention Program Growth - Add $40M To HHS Prevention Request (+$369M+$40M)
Law Enforcement:
Marijuana Eradication - Add $5M to DEA request ($909M+$5M)
High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA). ONDCP's own request asks for
funds to adds three "Diversion" HIDTAs to the existing list of seven HIDTAs.
[two were added in FY 1995.] Fully funds ONDCP's HIDTA Request (+$39M)
Byrne Grant Funding - Fully fund the DOJ Request (+$50M)
International:
Source Country Programs - Fully Fund The State Department Request (+$108M)
2
FEDERAL DRUG CONTROL FUNDING
In millions of dollars
20,000
VCRTF
15,000
37%
10,000
11%
5,000
52%
0
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Request
Dom. Law Enforcement
Int. Interdiction
Demand Reduction
VCRTF
3
Historical Supply/Demand Ratios
Fiscal Years 1988 to 1996
Percent
80
SUPPLY
70
68.5%
DEMAND
62.8%
60
50
40
31.5%
37.2%
30
20
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
4
Request
FEDERAL DRUG CONTROL FUNDING
Agency Summary
($ Millions)
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
ONDCP
Tentative
Req. Change
Budget
Agency
Priority
RMO Staff
1995 1996
Description of Major Funding Issues
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Mark
$
%
Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Service
6
6
6
6
-0.5
-7.6%
U.S. Forest Service
10
10
10
9
-0.4
-4.2%
Women, Infants, Children (WIC)
16
15
14
14
14
0.0
0.0%
Total, Agriculture
31
31
30
29
14
-0.9
-3.0%
Corp. For Nat'l & Com'ty Service
29
43
39
39
0.0
0.0%
Department of Defense
868
874
854
838
-16.1
-1.9%
o Based Upon Preliminary Estimates Subject To Change
Department of Education
599.0
781.0
603
732
732
803
129.0
21.4%
o DofEd: Adda (+ $88M) For Safe and Drug Pree Schools; Adde (#27M) For Not'l Programs
VCRTF Funding:
Adde It $35M) For Several Smaller Programs Education Programs
Family & Community Endeavor Schools Grants
---
0.6
1.6
2
1.6
1.0
179.7%
ONDCP: High Priorty To Fully Fund DofEd Request
0 RMO: Tentative Staff Mark Equale Sec. Riley's If Request Must Stay
Department of Education
599
781
604
734
734
678
130.8
21.7%
Planning Guidence
Dept. of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families
90
90
89
90
90
1.0
1.1%
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
1,143
1,420
1,144
1,380
1,420
1,298
236.2
20.7%
o HHS: Adde It $267M) To Blook Grent To Treet Hardoore Addicts
Administration (SAMSHA)
ONDCP: #1 Priority Adds It $260M) To Fully Fund HHG Treatment Request
RMO: Funds Hard-Core Treatment Increase @1200M Vs. Request 1+ #280M)
o HHS: Cute (-$11M) From Community Prevention Programs
HHS; Cute (-$12M) From Pregnent Women & Infente Prevention Programs
ONDCP: Adde $40M) For Targetted Prevention Programs @ SAMSHA
RMO: Reduces Request To FY95 Levels For Prevention (-$27M)
National Institutes of Health
425
444
438
452
452
14.7
3.4%
o HHS: Adds (+ $16M) For Increased Prevention and Treatment Research
Social Security Administration
20
23
119
119
119
0.0
0.0%
o HHS: Adds (+28M) For Drug Monitoring & Referral of SSI Recipients
Centers for Disease Control
37
37
44
49
49
5.1
11.6%
o HHS: Adds (+ $5M) For AIDS Prevention
Food and Drug Administration
7
7
7
7
7
0.4
5.7%
Health Care Financing Administration
262
292
292
330
330
37.8
12.9%
o HHS: Adds It $38M) To Address Increase MEDICAID Drug Related Costs
Indian Health Service
43
51
45
51
51
6.4
14.2%
o HHS: Increase It $6.4M) Long-Term Treatment of Hard-Core
Health Resources & Services Administration
33
39
36
38
38
2.0
5.6%
Users Among Native Americans
Co-Morbid Alcohol & Drug Treatment
218.0
183.0
229.0
228.0
228
232.0
VCRTF Funding:
Family & Community Endeavor Schools Grants
---
1.3
3.6
3.6
2.3
179.5%
o Scored 5% Drug Related
Total, HHS
2,278
2,586
2,445
2,750
2,434
305.0
12.5%
Dept. of Housing and Urban Dev.
315
315
290
300
300
10.0
3.4%
o HUD: Increase It $10M) For Drug Elimination Grants
Department of the Interior
Bureau of Indian Affairs
22
18
19
20
0.5
2.5%
Bureau of Land Management
5
5
5
5
-0.0
-0.2%
Fish & Wildlife Service
1
1
1
1
0.1
15.8%
National Park Service
9
9
9
9
0.0
0.0%
Office of Territorial and International Affairs
1
1
1
0
-0.8
-80.0%
Total, Interior
39
34
35
35
0
-0.2
-0.6%
The Judiciary
453
505
473
541
541
68.0
14.4%
0 Reflects Projected Growth in Judiciery Case Load
5
FEDERAL DRUG CONTROL FUNDING
Agency Summary
10 Millions)
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
ONDCP
Tentative
Req. Change
Budget
Agency
Priority
RMO Staff
1995 1996
Description of Major Funding lesues
Enected
Request
Enacted
Request
Mark
$
%
Department of Justice
Assets Forfeiture Fund
576
487
477
477
477
0.0
0.0%
U.S. Attorneys
208
209
213
226
213
12.7
6.0%
Bureau of Prisons
1,408
1,670
1,694
2,142
1,922
448.2
26.5%
o DOJ: Reflects Increase It $448M) To Activete 12 New Prisons
Includes (+ $5) For 600 Drug Treatment Bode With 3 New Facilities Started
RMO: Reduces Prison Activations To 6 New Prisons
Criminal Division
19
19
19
22
20
2.3
11.8%
Drug Enforcement Administration
768
767
800
909
#14
826
109.4
13.7%
. DOJ: Adde It $33M) For Office Autometion
ONDCP: Fund Agency Request; Adde I+ $5M) For Expanded Marijuana Eredication
RMO: Cute [-$30M] From Office Automation; Implements Streemlining [-$50M]
Federal Bureau of Investigation
257
262
492
602
626
110.2
22.4%
o DOJ: Increase (+ #122M) For Adv. Telephony, Field Sup., Tactical Ope
RMO: Reduces (-$77M) Adv. Telephony To $45M
Immigration and Naturalization Service
157
168
185
178
170
-6.3
-3.4%
Interpol
2
2
2
2
2
0.5
29.4%
U.S. Marshals Service
235
256
281
327
309
46.2
16.5%
o DOJ: Adds +25M) To Support New Court Houses
Office of Justice Programs
520
136
111
273
273
112
101.1
144.6%
. DOJ: Reflects Increased Byme Grants Direct Appropriational + #117M)
DNDCP: Supports DOJ Request For Level Funding For Byme Grants
RMO: Cute [-$160M] in Grants; Syme Funded Solely From VCRTF
Organized Crime Drug Enforcement
382
370
370
389
375
19.3
5.2%
DOJ: Adds (+ $19M) For Increased Costs Of Operations
RMO: Reduces Request (-$14M)
Support of U.S. Prisoners
222
263
229
257
229
27.8
12.1%
o DOJ: Adds I+ #10M) To Support Violent Crime Initiative
Tax Division
1
1
1
1
1
0.1
16.1%
Weed and Seed Program Fund
7
7
7
7
o
0.0
0.3%
VCRTF Funding:
Community Policing (100,000 Cope)
567
429
628
628
199.0
46.4%
o Scored 33% Drug Related Law Enforcement & Prevention
Prisons Grants
---
111
107
111.0
o Scored 20% Drug Related Law Enforcement
Drug Treatment For State & Federal Prisoners
---
27
41
26.5
o Scored 100% Drug Related Treatment
Local Crime Prevention Block Grant
---
7
6
7.3
o Scored 20% Drug Related Prevention
Model Intensive Grent Program
-
2
2
2.4
o Scored 5% Drug Related Prevention
Drug Courte
29
107
200
77.6
267.4%
o Scored 100% Drug Related Treatment
Improving Border Controls
16
24
35
9.0
60.5%
o Scored 5% Drug Related Law Enforcement
Rural Drug Trafficking
---
12
17
11.5
o Scored 100% Drug Related Law Enforcement
Byrne Grants
450
260
260
-190.0
-42.2%
o Scored 100% Drug Related Law Enforcement
Additional DEA Agents
-
12
12
12.0
o Scored 100% Drug Related Law Enforcement
Other VCRTF Funding
1
23
14
22.6
Total, Justice
4,762
5,184
5,803
7,024
6,502
1220.4
21.0%
Department of Labor
65
80
77
97
19.8
25.8%
Off. of National Drug Control Policy
Operations
12
10
10
29
28
19.4
195.6%
o ONDCP: Adde 1+ #15M) For Hard Core User Study: Provides $4.5M, 21FTE)
For Additional Staff To Perform Newly Mandated Authorities
High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas
86
98
107
146
146
39.0
36.4%
o ONDCP: Adds It $39M) To Support New Beltimors/Weshington and Puerto Rico/VI HIDTA
Special Forfeiture Fund
13
53
42
:
86
44,1
105.3%
ONDCP: Adde $44M) For Unspecified Initiatives
Total ONDCP
111
161
159
261
261
o
102.5
64.6%
Small Business Administration
0
0
0
o
0
0.1
50.0%
Agency for International Development
45
---
37
---
0.0%
o FY 1995 Funding Estimate "Soft" And May Be Overstated By $5M
Department of State
International Nercotic Matters (INM), Politico/Military Affairs, & Diplomatic/
Bureau of International Narootics Matters
0
I
1
...
-
Consular Service Bureaue Merged Into An International Narcotics Control
Bureau of Politico/Military Affaire
o
-
Program (INCP)
International Narootics Control Program
115
232
122
213
213
213
91.2
74.8%
. State: Adds (+ $91M) To Restore Funding To Prior Levels
Emer. in the Dip. and Consular Service
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
RMO; Tentitive Approval of State's Request
Total, State
116
232
122
213
213
91.2
74.8%
6
FEDERAL DRUG CONTROL FUNDING
Agency Summary
" Millione)
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
ONDCP
Tentative
Req. Change
Budget
Agency
Priority
RMO Staff
1995 1996
Description of Major Funding Issues
Enacted
Request
Enected
Request
Mark
*
%
Department of Transportation
U.S. Coast Guard
315
263
269
251
-8.1
-3.1%
0 DOT: Reflects Reduction (-$8M) in CG Anti-Drug Operations As The
Federal Aviation Administration
26
17
17
20
4.0
24.1%
Result of Diversion of Effort To Haitian Refuges Problem
National Highway Traffic Safety Admin.
34
28
29
28
-1.7
-5.8%
Total, Transportation
374
307
305
299
0
-5.8
-1.9%
Department of the Treasury
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
154
164
157
162
5.6
3.6%
U.S. Customs Service
536
506
513
514
1.1
0.2%
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
20
18
22
20
-1.5
-7.0%
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
15
16
18
11
-6.6 -37.0%
Internal Revenue Service
90
95
91
100
9.0
9.8%
U.S. Secret Service
57
57
58
65
7.6
13.0%
Treasury Forfeiture Fund
230
209
209
209
0.0
0.0%
Total, Treasury
1,103
1,054
1,067
1,082
15.1
1.4%
U.S. Information Agency
8
10
8
8
0.4
5.2%
o Funds Public Diplomacy Activities Relating To Counter-Narootice
Efforts Overseas
Department of Veterans Affairs
940
981
887
940
52.5
5.9%
o VA: Adds (+ $42.5) To Reflect Cost of Medical Care Inflation
Adds ($10M & 107FTE) For Substance Abuse Prevention Services
Total Federal Program
12,134
13,178
13,236
15,192
1955.9 14.8%
Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund Summary [Non Add]
PREVENTION & TREATMENT
Model Intensive Prevention Grants
--
2.0
2.0
2.0
FACES Grants
1.8
5.2
6.2
3.3
180.8%
Local Crime Prevention Block Grant
--
-
7.6
6.0
7.5
Federal & State Prison Drug Treatment
-
27.0
41.0
27.0
Drug Courts
28.0
107.0
200.0
78.0
269.0%
Other Prevention
9.0
7.2
STATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Community Policing Grants
429.0
429.0
628.0
628.0
189.0
46.4%
Bryne Grant Program
450.0
260.0
260.0
-190.0
-42.2%
Prison Grants
38.7
111.0
107.0
72.3
186.8%
Rural Law Enforcement
-
12.0
17.0
12.0
Other S&L Law Enforcement
-
---
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Treasury Authorizations
-
17.5
17.5
17.5
Justice Authorizations
---
7.0
7.0
7.0
DEA Agents
-
12.0
12.0
12.0
Improving Border Controls
-
8.0
24.0
36.0
15.0
166.7%
Other Federal Law Enforcement
---
86.0
---
-
TOTAL CRIME CONTROL ACT
0.0
515.0
$66.6
1,227
1,338
260.8
27.0%
TOTAL DRUG CONTROL [Inol. Crime Control]
12,134
13,178
13,236
15,192
1,956
14.8%
Total Supply Programs
7,683
7,742
8,340
9,592
1,252
15.0%
0 REQ LEVEL: Increases Supply Programs By An Estimated +$1.38
63.3%
58.7%
63.0%
63.1%
Total Demand Programs
4,451
5,419
4,896
5,599
704
14.4%
o REQ LEVEL: Increases Demand Programs By An Estimated + $704M
36.7%
41.1%
37.0%
36.9%
7
Staff Analysis
The Drug Abuse Problem Remains With Us
It Is Estimated That 11.4 Million Americans Use Illicit Drugs and 3.1 Percent of
Adults Over 18 Have Serious Substance Abuse Disorders
Drug Use Costs Society An Estimated $67 Billion Annually [Rice & Miller, 1993]
Although Casual Use of Cocaine Has Dropped Since A Peak in 1985 --
-- The Hard Core Abuser Population Remains Constant [Gfroerer & Brodsky, 1993]
-- Hospital Emergency Room Drug Statistics Indicate Chronic Drug Use Consequences
Are Up Dramatically (DAWN, SAMHSA, 1993)
-- In 1993 There Were Signs That Marijuana, LSD, and Stimulants Use Was Increasing
Among Eighth Graders (Johnston, et al, 1993)
Significant Progress Has Been Made Addressing Drug Abuse
Prevention Program Effectiveness Is Difficult To Measure, But the Dramatic Drop In
Casual Drug Use Indicates The Prevention Message Is Getting Through
-- Casual Use of All Drugs Is Down Significantly
--
Casual Use By All Age Groups Is Down Significantly
8
Drug Abuse Takes a Heavy Economic Toll on Society
ESTIMATED ECONOMIC COSTS OF DRUG ABUSE
Direct Medical
AIDS
3.2 Billion
6.3 Billion
4.8%
9.4%
Death
3.4 Billion
5.1%
Illness
8.0 Billion
11.9%
Crimes and
Misdemeanors
46.0 Billion
68.8%
SOURCE
Substance Abuse: The Nation's
Number One Health Problem, Key
Indicators for Policy, Institute for
Health Policy, Brandeis
University (1993)
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
$66.9 BILLION
9
Casual Use Is Down Significantly
25
LEGEND
Any Illicit Drug
20
Current Marijuana
Occasional Cocaine
Current Cocaine
MILLIONS OF USERS
15
SOURCE
National Household Survey on
10
Drug Abuse, National Institute
on Drug Abuse (1985-1991);
Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
5
(1993)
0
1985
1988
1990
1991
1992
10
Hardcore Drug Users Are at the Heart of the Problem
While the number of individuals using illicit drugs at least weekly is
unchanged, these individuals consume a greater proportion of illicit
drugs then ever.
ANNUAL CONSUMPTION
350
300
250
METRIC TONS OF PURE COCAINE
200
150
100
50
0
72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
YEAR
LEGEND
SOURCE
Hardcore User
Modeling the Demand for Cocaine,
Casual User
RAND Corporation (1994)
Drug Use Among Young People Is Increasing
MARIJUANA
LSD
16
2.5
14
2
12
10
1.5
PERCENT
8
PERCENT
1
6
4
0.5
2
0
I
0
!
1991
1992
1993
1991
1992
1993
INHALANTS
STIMULANTS
6
4.5
4
5
3.5
4
3
PERCENT
PERCENT
2.5
3
2
2
1.5
1
1
0.5
0
I
0
I
I
1991
1992
1993
1991
1992
1993
LEGEND
SOURCE
NOTE
8th Grade
Monitoring the Future study,
Data are for past 30-day use
10th Grade
Institute for Social Research,
12
Program Performance
Drug Abuse Treatment Works
-- Drug Use After Treatment Is Measurably Lower
-- Recidivism Depends On Quality/Duration of Treatment and After Care
-- Incidence of Predatory Crime Is Lowered After Treatment (Hubbard, et al., 1989)
-- Studies Indicate That Crime, Job Problems, HIV Exposure Are Dramatically Lower
As A Result of Drug Treatment (Harrison and Hoffman, 1989)
Drug Abuse Treatment Has Been Demonstrated To Be Cost Effective
-- Residential Treatment Costs Average From $2,400 to $8,200 Per Addict
-- Methadone Treatment For Heroin Addiction Costs $3,500 Annually
This Compares Favorably To:
-- One Year of Untreated Addiction Costing Society $43,200 Annually (NIDA, 1991)
-- One Year of Incarceration Costing $ 39,600 Annually (NIDA, 1991)
Law Enforcement Has Been Expanding Its Role As A Partner In Treatment
-- Drug Courts Provide Treatment Alternatives To Costly Incarceration
-- Growing Treatment Programs For Incarcerated Addicts Have Lowered Rearrest Rates
-- Monitoring & After Care For Released Prisoners Appears To Improve Success Rates
-- While The Jury Is still Out On The Effectiveness of Boot Camps, They Do Reduce
Incarceration Costs By Shortening Sentences For First-Time Nonviolent Offenders
Community Partnerships Are Making A Difference
-- Active Community Groups Are Influencing The Level of Crime and Drug Activity
-- Coalitions Are Influencing Local Legislation and Policies Aimed At Reducing Drug
Use and Drug-Related Crime
Providing Effective Treatment For The Hard-Core User Is ONDCP's Number One Drug Priority
-- Appropriators Have Been Reluctant To Fund A Separate Hard-Core Initiative
13
Costs To Society of Drug Addiction
AVERAGE COST PER ADDICT
$ IN
Thousands
25
22.7
20
15
14.7
Criminal Justice
Theft Losses
10
Victim Losses
Health Care
7.9
6.1
5.9
Transfer Payments
5
3.8
3.2
2.2
1.8
2.4
1.8
2
O
Total Costs
Before
After
Treatment
Treatment
SOURCE: CONTRACTED STUDY BY THE NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER
FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
14
Violent Crime Rates
FBI and BJS Data - Violent Crime in the U.S.
800
FBI - Uniform Crime Reports
700
(Per 100,000 inhabitants)
600
500
400
BJS - Crime Victimization Survey
(Per 10,000 Persons (Ages 12 & Up))
300
200
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
ELAINE -
1
How many LAWYERS ARE THERE IN THE
FEDERAL GOVT ?
How ABOUT A 20-33% REDUCTION?
P.S. START WITH PAUL DIMOND GENE SPERLING.
when do I voluter?
We'll make you Asst to the Pres. for Tennis yes!
FBI Staffing and FTE
26500
LEGEND
26000
- On-Board Staff
25500
- FTE Levels
DOJ Req.
25000
PAD Rec.
24500
24000
23500
23000
22500
Sept. 1993
FY94 FTE
Sept. 1994
FY95 FTE
Sept. 1995
FY96 FTE
Sept. 1996
Summary of Reductions to FY1996 DOJ Request
($ in Millions)
Bureau
Description
Budget Authority
FBI
Reduces funding for R&D and equipment purchases to support wiretaps
-77
Imposes streamlining allowance on FBI
-76
Eliminates additional FTE to combat Eastern European Crime (-126 FTE)
-27
Eliminates field support staff enhancement (-164 FTE)
-27
Reduces funding to upgrade computer workstations
-16
Reduces funding for new automobiles
-19
Does not fund State and local overtime request
-6
DEA
Imposes streamlining allowance on DEA
-33
Reduces linguist support, equipment, and R&D in support of wiretaps
-10
Reduces funding to upgrade computer workstations
-37
Reduces Heroin initiative (-13 FTE)
-3
INS
Reduced personnel and inflation costs*
-23
Do not fund technical base adjustment for Border Patrol ($30M instead in BCF)
-10
Do not fund training program
-3
Do not fund expansion of ASK IMMIGRATION telephone program
-6
Do not fund Administratively Determine Pay for attorneys
-8
Do not fund deployment of Verification for Immigration Status (VIS) system
-1
Do not fund expansion of research and development program
-2
Do not fund expansion of IHP beyond VCRTF portion
-9
Do not fund expansion of automation beyond VCRTF portion
-8
Do not fund expansion of 92 inspectors ($5M instead in BCF)
-4
Do not fund expansion of 1,010 detention bedspaces ($17M instead in BCF)
-17
BOP
Reduced personnel and inflation costs*
-61
Assume a six month delay in opening of new prisons
-98
Do not fund PHS physician loan repayment program
-1
Freeze prison maintenance budget at the 1995 enacted levels
-61
Do not fund CAP grants to States traded for detention bedspaces for Federal in
-20
Do not fund expanded Federal boot camp program (-800 bedspaces)
-6
Do not fund expanded modernization and repair of existing prisons
-33
Do not fund expansions of 3 existing facilities (-273 bedspaces)
-15
Freeze National Institute of Justice assistance to State and local correction agen
-5
Freeze funding for rental of detetnion bedspaces from State and locals at the 1995
-71
Detention
level
U.S. Attorneys
Fund only VCRTF portion of nation-wide anti-violence/gang plan
-2
No increased affirmative civil litigation
-22
No additional victim/witness assistants
-6
No health care fraud initiative
-6
No multi-disciplinary teams to prosecute crime on Indian land
-5
Fund 60% cost of monitoring Teamsters election
-4
No administratively determined pay
-28
Litigating Divisions
Fund 25% automated litigation support for A-12 lawsuit
-9
Level-fund JCON automation procurement
-9
Deny all civil rights litigation initiatives except employment testing
-4
No environmental litigation initiatives (eco-system/multi-media based)
-6
No modernization of Tax Division computer systems
-1
No additional U.S. Trustee staff
-8
Justice Assistance
Reduces Byrne formula grants
-190
Reduces Byrne discretionary grants
-50
Eliminates expansion of juvenile justice programs
-43
Reduces funding for development of national records check system
-50
Eliminates increases for crime statistics and research
-8
Freeze funding at the 1995 level and take streamlining savings
-15
GA
Do not fund administratively determined pay for attorneys
-3
Do not fund increases for Offices of Policy Development Pardon Attorney,
and Professional Responsibility
-2
OIG
Freeze funding at the 1995 level and take streamlining savings
-2
*
Reduced personnel and inflation costs includes (1) no increases requested by Justice to finance a 1996
pay raise, (2) requiring Justice to absorb within-grade-increases, and (3) requiring Justice to absorb
anticipated 1996 inflation.
Clinton Presidential Records
Digital Records Marker
This is not a presidential record. This is used as an administrative
marker by the William J. Clinton Presidential Library Staff.
This marker identifies the place of a tabbed divider. Given our
digitization capabilities, we are sometimes unable to adequately
scan such dividers. The title from the original document is
indicated below.
II
Divider Title:
Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund
The Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund (VCRTF) was established as a funding mechanism
to support programs authorized in the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of
1994 [P.L.103-322]. The Fund is sustained by annual deposits in amounts shown below
derived from previously estimated savings generated by reductions in Federal FTEs. The
Fund provides resources for six years [FY 1995 - FY 2000] at specific BA and Outlay
levels. Rules governing the use of VCRTF resources require a sequester of funds should
either BA or Outlay levels be exceeded. They also allow for unfunded authorizations to be
carried forward if unused and for limited flexibility to adjust funding among programs
within three major categories -- Prevention, State and Local Law Enforcement, and Federal
Law Enforcement. FY 1995 to FY 1998 authorizations exceed the BA available in the VCRTF,
but in FY 1999 and FY 2000 the reverse is true, as shown below. There are over 70
programs authorized for funding under the VCRTF (see pages 7-10). A summary can be found
on page 6.
($ in Millions)
FY 1995
FY 1996
FY 1997
FY 1998
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 1995-00
VCRTF Caps:
BA
2,423
4,287
5,000
5,500
6,500
6,500
30,210
OL
703
2,334
3,936
4,904
5,639
6,225
23,741
Crime Authorizations
2,869
4,866
5,416
6,167
6,141
4,759
30,210
Diff. (Cap Less Auth) - 446
- 579
- 416
- 667
+ 359
+1,741
o
Allocation of FY 1996 Programs
Department of Justice Request: DOJ's request for the allocation of FY 1996 VCRTF amounts
was generally even handed. DOJ requested, if not full funding, at least adequate funding
for those programs administered by other departments. Justice requested full funding or
close to full funding for the Community Policing Program (including FY95 carryover
authorizations), Grants to Combat Violence Against Women, Byrne Formula Grants, Treasury
1
and Justice general authorizations, and Federal programs to address illegal immigration.
After covering clear Administration priorities, Justice allocated sizable funding for the
Local Partnership Act and spread the remaining available funds on a pro-rata basis. As a
result, for FY 1996, Justice requested funding for 62% of prevention program
authorizations, 84% of State and local law enforcement authorizations, and 96% of Federal
law enforcement authorizations.
PAD Changes To DOJ Request: The PAD review of VCRTF allocations zeroed out two programs,
the Local Partnership Act (LPA) and the Community Economic Partnership Program. These
cuts, together with other small reductions to the Justice request, free more than $150
million to beef up other more focused prevention and law enforcement programs. The
resulting redistribution of funds (shown on the attached table) concentrates resources to
support other top Administration priorities such as: Ounce of Prevention, drug courts,
prison drug treatment, and school-based crime prevention programs.
Sensitive Programs: As noted above, authorizations for programs for 1995 through 1998
exceed available trust fund resources. As a result, some program funding must be delayed
or reduced in the early years in order to accommodate higher priority spending. Some
possible areas of contention with the PAD recommendations are:
The Local Partnership Act (LPA). This program is essentially a form of urban revenue
sharing. It is strongly supported by Rep. Conyers [its author] and large city mayors
who stand to benefit from it. The LPA, which is authorized at $270 million for FY
1996 [$1.6 billion over 5 years], is proposed to be funded at only $3 million for FY
1996. The $3 million is for Census to complete statistical surveys needed to
accurately formulate funds distribution. Both HUD and OMB staff view the Act's
formula mechanism as flawed and Census maintains that the statistical data to support
funds distribution is inadequate. The delay in funding for one-year would provide
sufficient time to ensure formula anomalies are addressed.
Violent Repeat Offender Incarceration Grants. This program provides discretionary
grants to States and localities for prison construction and/or prison operations. It
is strongly supported by "law and order" lawmakers. These grants are authorized at
$750 million for FY 1996. The PAD recommendation provides $419 million, or 56
percent of the FY 1996 authorizations. Proponents of increased prison spending will
likely be critical of the 44 percent shortfall.
2
Prevention Funding. In the aggregate, the PAD recommends funding sixty-two percent of
authorized crime prevention funding, or $740 million of $1.1 billion in potential
appropriations. Critics may maintain that the Administration is not funding the Crime Act
in a balanced way, citing that the Administration is requesting nearly full funding (96%)
of Federal law enforcement programs authorized under the Act. This difference, however,
is driven largely by the desire to finance immigration programs and Justice and Treasury
programs.
Byrne Formula Grants. This program has been in existence since 1988 and provides
grants for State and local drug law enforcement. The PAD recommends the Byrne
Program be funded at $260 million for FY 1996, its full 1996 authorization level
($130M) along with carryover 1995 authorizations (an additional $130M). While this
represents the maximum possible under the Act, the PAD recommendation does not
provide any general fund, or non-VCRTF appropriations for this program. This means
that the VCRTF would be the sole funding source for this program. Although over $3.0
billion of other law enforcement grant will be requested through the VCRTF, the
Administration would be criticized for allowing total funding for the Byrne Grant
program to erode. To sustain the Byrne Grant Program at FY 1995 levels, $190 million
of non-VCRTF funding would be required. The PAD views this as unrealistic, as the
DOJ request is $2.0 billion above its planning guidance.
Byrne Formula Grant Program
($ in Millions)
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
Enacted
Enacted
Request
PAD
General Fund
$ 358
$ --
$ 190
$
0
VCRTF
--
450
260
260
Total Grants
$ 358
$ 450
$ 450
$ 260
3
Funding Options:
Option #1. Adopt a programmatic allocation as shown on the attached tables. Such an
allocation places emphasis on Administration priorities and delays implementation of those
programs where benefits are either suspect or unproven. Option #1 does carry the risk of
criticism from advocates of those programs viewed as under funded.
Option #2. Shift some funding from Administration priorities to address some
sensitive programs identified above. This would enable programs to be allocated at least
some funding for start-up, such as the Local Partnership Act, Community Economic
Partnership operations, and increased funding for prison grants. Such a shift could
require a reduction of approximately five percent to fully funded Administration
priorities.
Option #3. Distribute all VCRTF funding on a strictly mechanical basis, providing
each program with a pro-rata share of available budget authority. Such an allocation
would provide each program with approximately 88% of its FY 1996 authorization. Under
this option, all programs would receive some funding regardless of programmatic merit,
timing, or public policy considerations. Option 3 would also address the issue of "fair"
allocation of funding among the three major crime act categories - prevention, State &
local law enforcement, and Federal law enforcement. Such an approach would however,
result in significant cuts to Administration priorities. The option would also ignore the
problem of how to address unused FY 1995 authorizations carried over to FY 1996.
Staff Recommendation:
Option #1.
4
Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund
Authorizations V. Available BA
$ Millions
7,000
6,000
VCRTF BA
5,000
4,000
Authorizations
3,000
2,000
1,000
O
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Fiscal Years
Federal
Prevention
Law Enforcement
State and Local
Law Enforcement
5
Summary
Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund
($ in Millions)
FY 1995
FY 1996
Comments
DOJ
Other
PAD
Request
Enacted
Request
Agy Req.
Recom
PREVENTION PROGRAMS:
Community Economic Partnership
---
-
21.7
45.0
0.0
Grants To Businesses In High Crime Areas - Kennedy Priority
Delayed Funding Recommended Least Direct Impact On Violent Crime
Drug Courts
---
29.0
106.6
---
200.0
Drug Treatment/Counseling For Non-Violent Offenders DOJ/ONDCP Priority
Family & Community Endeavor Schools (FACES)
---
37.0
49.9
103.5
103.5
In- & After-School Mentoring/Jobs/Activities Programs - HHS/DofEd Priority
Gang Resistance Training (GREAT)
---
9.0
3.0
7.2
7.2
Grants For Teaching Violence Resistance Skills Treasury Priority
Local Crime Prevention Block Grant
---
---
36.6
---
30.0
Merger of Smaller Prevention Programs - Seniors/Children/Juveniles
Local Partnership Act
---
-
130.2
270.0
3.0
Form of "Revenue Sharing" With Cities - Conyers Priority
First Year Funding Delayed To Ensure Adequate Census Data Available [$3M]
Model Intensive Grants Program
---
---
48.2
48.2
Targets 15 High Crime Areas - Schumer Priority
Ounce of Prevention
---
1.5
7.1
14.7
14.7
Lead Agency For Prevention Coordination - VP Chairs
Prison Drug Treatment - State & Federal
---
---
26.5
...
40.5
Grants & Funding For Drug Treatment of Incarcerated Offenders - ONDCP Priority
Safety For Women - Parks & Transit
---
-
35.0
-
17.5
Capital Improvement Projects To Enhance Parks/Transit Security
Violence Against Women Act
---
27.5
261.9
261.9
261.9
Programs To Prevent Violence Against Women - Biden Priority
Other
---
0.0
14.3
---
13.7
Total Crime Prevention
---
104.0
741.0
970.0
740.2
STATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Byrne Grants
---
450.0
260.0
...
260.0
Formula Grants To State & Local Drug Enforcement - Sole Funding For Program
Certainty of Punishment for Violent Youth
---
---
9.6
---
9.6
Grants For Innovative Correctional Options For Youthful Offenders
Community Policing Grants
1,720.0
1,300.0
1,882.0
---
1,882.0
Puts 100,000 Cops On The Beat Only A+ + Presidential Priority
Criminal Alien Incarceration
---
130.0
300.0
-
300.0
Grants To States To Reimburse For Cost of Incarcerating Criminal Aliens
Criminal Records Upgrade - Brady
100.0
100.0
12.1
---
25.0
Grants To Improve Criminal Justice Record Keeping
Police Corps/Scholarships
---
---
19.3
-
19.3
Scholarship For Entering and In-Service Police Officer Education
Rural Law Enforcement
--
---
12.1
---
17.0
Grants To Support Rural Drug Task Forces
Violent Offender Incarceration
-
25.0
434.2
-
419.0
Grants For Prison Construction/Operation/Moderization
Other
---
0.0
36.8
1.0
35.9
Total State & Local Law Enforcement
1,820.0
2,005.0
2,966.0
2,967.0
2,967.8
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Criminal Alien Tracking Center
---
---
3.4
---
3.4
Extablishes A Criminal Alien Tracking Center
Expanded Special Deportation
64.0
54.0
55.0
-
55.0
Expands Programs For Deportation of Incarcerated Criminal Aliens At Release
Expeditious Deportation . Asylum Reform
55.0
49.0
84.4
-
84.4
Funding To Improve Allen Asylum Adjudication & Deportation Procedures
Improving Border Controls
181.0
181.0
232.0
---
232.0
Enhances Border Patrol Staffing & Operations
Judiciary
---
---
31.3
31.3
31.3
Offsets Judiciary Costs of Implementing The Act
Justice Authorizations
---
---
87.0
---
87.0
Funds Various Justice Law Enforcement Programs
Treasury Authorizations
---
30.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
Funds Various Treasury Law Enforcement Programs
Other
303.0
---
16.9
---
15.9
Total Federal Law Enforcement
539.0
314.0
580.0
580.0
579.0
TOTAL VCRTF
2,359.0
2,423.0
4,287.0
4,517.0
4,287.0
6
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
1# IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-17-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
FY 1995
FY 1996
DOJ
Other Agey
PAD
PAD Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
Estimate
New
Total
FTE's
Auth.
Auth.
PREVENTION:
Model Intensive Prevention
DOJ
---
---
48.216
48.216
43.394
43.394
100.000
100.000
Ounce of Prevention Council
DOJ
2
2
7.088
14.700
14.700
3.234
3.804
15
14.700
14.700
FACES (Family & Community Endeavor Schools)
72.350
72.350
Community Schools Youth Services Grants
HHS
26
26
29.581
72.450
72.450
15.939
25.781
Family & Community Endeavor Schools Grants
DofEd
11
11
20.232
31.050
31.050
6.831
11.049
31.050
31.050
Local Crime Prevention Block Grants
DOJ
...
---
36.615
30,000
27.000
27.000
75.940
75.940
Assist for Delinq'nt & At-Risk Youth [Youth Academies]
DOJ
---
---
2.604
0.000
0.000
0.000
5.400
5.400
Local Partnership Act
HUD
---
130.184
270.000
3.000
2.700
2.700
270.000
270.000
-
Community Economic Partnership
HHS
---
---
21.697
45,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
45,000
45.000
GREAT (Gang Resistance Education & Training]
Treasury
9
9
2.989
7.200
7.200
1.584
5.004
0
7.200
7.200
Missing Alzheimer's Patients
DOJ
---
---
0.900
0.900
0.198
0.198
0.900
0.900
Urban Recreation and At-Risk Youth
DOI
...
---
1.302
2.700
2.700
0.594
0.594
2.700
2.700
Prison Drug Treatment (State)
DOJ
...
-
13.018
27.000
5.940
5.940
27.000
27.000
Prison Drug Treatment (Federal)
DOJ
---
-
13.500
13.500
11.475
11.475
13.500
13.500
Violence Against Women Act
Law Enforcement & Prosecution Grants
DOJ/HH
26
26
130.000
130.000
28.600
38.480
130.000
130.000
Rape Prevention
HHS
---
---
35.000
35.000
35,000
7.700
7.700
35.000
35,000
Runaway, Homeless, and Street Youth
HHS
---
---
7.000
7.000
7.000
1.540
1.540
7.000
7.000
0.400
0.400
Domestic Violence Hotline
HHS
1
1
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.088
0.468
Encouraging Arrest Policies
DOJ
---
-
28,000
28,000
6.160
6.160
28.000
28.000
Battered Women's Shelters
HHS
---
-
50.000
50.000
50.000
11.000
11.000
50.000
50.000
Rural Domestic Violence Enforcement
DOJ
---
---
7.000
7.000
1.540
1.540
7.000
7.000
Community Programs On Domestic Violence
HHS
---
4.000
4.000
4.000
0.880
0.880
4.000
4.000
---
Youth Education & Domestic Violence
HHS
---
---
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.088
0.088
0.400
0.400
Number & Cost of Injuries Study
HHS
...
---
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.022
0.022
0.100
0.100
Victims of Child Abuse
---
---
Court Appointed Special Advocates
OJP
---
---
6.000
6.000
1.320
1.320
6.000
6.000
Training For Judicial Personnel & Practioners
OJP
---
---
0.750
0.750
0.165
0.165
0.750
0.750
Grants For Televised Testimony
OJP
---
---
0.250
0.250
0.055
0.055
0.250
0.250
Access To Federal Criminal Information - Stalker
DOJ
---
---
1.500
1.500
0.330
0.330
1.500
1.500
Family Unity - State Grants
OJP
---
---
1.562
1.562
0.344
0.344
3.240
3.240
Safety For Women - Parks/Transit
Capital Improvement - National Parks
DOI
...
---
10.000
10.000
5.000
1.100
1.100
10.000
10.000
Capital Improvements - Public Parks
DOI
...
---
15.000
15.000
7.500
1.650
1.650
15.000
15.000
10.000
Capital Improvements - Public Transporation
DOT
---
---
10.000
10.000
5.000
0.250
0.250
10.000
Misc. Provisions (Rpts, Training, Education)
DOJ/HH
---
-
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.600
1.600
Drug Courts
DOJ
29
100
106.558
200.000
44.000
55.020
221.000
150.000
Total Prevention
104
175
741
575
740
226
265
15
1,197
1,126
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
61.9%
973
= DOJ + Higher Agency Request
7
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
($ IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-17-94
Crime Act Programs
FY 1995
FY 1996
Provision
DOJ
Other Agey
PAD
PAD Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
Estimate
New
Total
FTE's
Auth.
Auth.
0.220
STATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Community Policing Grants
DOJ
1,300
1,332
1,882.000
1,882.000
414.040
908.040
310
1882.000
1850.000
DNA Identification (State Grants)
DOJ
---
---
0.482
0.482
0.106
0.106
1.000
1.000
Police Recruitment
DOJ
---
---
0.964
0.964
0.212
0.212
2.000
2.000
11.090
2.440
23.000
23.000
State Courts Assistance
DOJ
---
---
11.090
2.440
DOJ
24.000
24.000
Technical Assistance
---
---
State Grants
OJP
---
---
4.822
4.822
1.061
1.061
Quantico Training/Intelligence Gathering
FBI
---
---
4.000
4.000
0.880
0.880
Techical Automation Improvement Quantico
FBI
---
---
10.000
10.000
2.200
2.200
Brady - Criminal Records Upgrade
DOJ
100
100
12.054
25.000
5.500
43.500
25.000
25.000
Community Based Prosecutors & Functions
DOJ
---
---
3.375
3.375
0.743
0.743
7.000
7.000
Rural Law Enforcement
Rural Law Enforcement Grants
DOJ
3.520
3.520
24,000
24.000
---
---
11.572
16.000
Rural Drug Enforcement Training
Treasury
---
---
0.482
1.000
1.000
0.220
0.220
1.000
1.000
Criminal Justice/Substance Abuse Training
DOJ
---
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.000
1.000
---
TB Prevention & Treatment In Correctional Institutions
DOJ
---
---
0.338
0.338
0.074
0.074
0.700
0.700
Police Corps
DOJ
---
---
9.643
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Police Corps In Service Scholarships
DOJ
---
---
9.643
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
1.205
0.265
0.265
2.500
2.500
Family Support
DOJ
---
---
1.205
Byrne Grants
DOJ
450
580
260.000
260.000
57.200
228.200
260.000
130.000
Violent Repeat Offender Incarceration
DOJ
25
175
434.188
418.988
92.177
101.487
900.500
750.000
Certain Punishment for Youthful Offenders
DOJ
---
---
9.643
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Criminal Alien Incarceration
DOJ
130
130
300.000
300.000
204.000
291.100
300.000
300.000
Total State and Local Law Enforcement
2,005
2,317
2,966
1
2,968
791
1,590
310
3,514
3,201
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
84.4%
8
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
($ IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-17-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
FY 1995
FY 1996
DOJ
Other Agey
PAD
PAD Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
Estimate
New
Total
FTE's
Auth.
Auth.
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Treasury Authorizations
Treasury
30
70.000
70.000
70.000
58.800
58.800
351
70.000
70.000
Office of Enforcement
2.400
0.000
0.360
FinCEN
3.000
0.000
0.450
BATF
7.110
0.000
1.067
U.S. Customs
3.890
0.000
0.584
Internal Revenue Service
7.000
0.000
1.050
U.S. Secret Service
6.600
0.000
0.990
Justice Authorizations
DOJ
---
-
0.000
0.000
40.000
40.000
Wireless Communications
FBI
---
--
8,000
2.500
0.550
0.550
Automated Booking Stations
GA
---
---
11.000
11.000
2.420
2.420
4
Freedom of Information Automation
GA
--
---
4.500
4.500
0.990
0.990
U.S. Marshals Courthouses
USMS
---
--
16.500
16.500
14.850
14.850
40
FBI
---
--
35.000
35.000
Technical Support Center
FBI
---
-
16.100
0.000
0.000
0.000
Advanced Telephony
FBI
---
---
18.900
40.500
32.400
32.400
DEA (Annualization of 1995 Agents)
DOJ
---
---
8.035
8.035
6.428
6.428
58
12.000
12.000
Heroin Domestic Enforcement
---
-
3.965
3.965
3.172
3.172
15
US Attorneys
DOJ
--
-
5.000
5.000
4.400
4.400
5.000
5.000
SCAMS - Telemarketing Fraud (FBI/USA)
---
---
0.000
0.000
2.000
2.000
FBI Agents
FBI
---
---
0.750
0.000
0.000
0.000
U.S. Attorneys
USA
---
---
0.250
0.000
0.000
0.000
Public Awareness & Prevention
OJP
--
---
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
DOJ
--
--
1.500
1.500
1.200
1.200
1.500
1.500
Improving Border Controls
DOJ
181
228
232.000
232.000
151.679
188.595
810
232.000
185.000
Criminal Alien Tracking Center
DOJ
---
---
3.400
3.400
2.720
2.720
20
3.400
3.400
Expeditious Deportation Asylum Reform
DOJ
49
64
84.400
84.400
67.520
74.870
754
105.000
90.000
Expanded Special Deportation
DOJ
54
55
55.000
55.000
44.000
52.100
380
55.000
54.000
DNA (FBI)
DOJ
--
---
4.600
4.600
3.680
3.680
30
5.500
5.500
Presidential Summit On Violence/Nat'l Commission
DOJ
1.000
--
--
1.000
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
Anti-Gang/Drug Grants In Federally Assisted Housing
DOJ
---
---
1.000
1,000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1.000
Family Unity Federal Prisoners
OJP
---
--
0.360
0.360
0.288
0.288
0.360
0.360
Violence Against Women
Federal Victim Counselors
USA
---
-
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.500
Training Programs
OJP
---
-
1.000
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1.000
State Databases Study
OJP
-
---
0.200
0.200
0.160
0.160
0.200
0.200
National Baseline Study on Campus Sexual Assault
OJP
---
---
0.200
0.200
0.160
0.160
0.200
0.200
The Judiciary
Judiciary
---
---
30.000
30.000
30,000
24.000
24.000
?
30.000
30.000
Training Judges/Court Personnel
Judiciary
---
---
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.700
Equal Justice For Women In Courts/Training Grants
SJI
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.480
0.480
7
1.300
1.300
--
---
Total Federal Law Enforcement
314
377
580
101
579
424
481
2,462
602
539
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
96.3%
Total Funding
2,422
2,869
4,287
677
4,287
1,441
2,336
2,787
5,313
4,866
Total Trust Fund Available
2,423
2,423
4,287
4,287
2,334
4,287
4,287
Funds Under (Over) Allocated
1
(446)
0
(0)
(2)
(1,026)
(579)
4,518 = DOJ + Higher Agency Request
OMB/Duke/x53451
9
Clinton Presidential Records
Digital Records Marker
This is not a presidential record. This is used as an administrative
marker by the William J. Clinton Presidential Library Staff.
This marker identifies the place of a tabbed divider. Given our
digitization capabilities, we are sometimes unable to adequately
scan such dividers. The title from the original document is
indicated below.
III
Divider Title:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FY 1996 DIRECTOR'S REVIEW
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.
OVERVIEW
A.
AGENCY SUMMARY
2
B.
STREAMLINING PLAN STATUS
1.
FTE SUMMARY
3
2.
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT
4
C.
DISCRETIONARY INVESTMENT PROPOSALS
6
2.
DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS
A.
SUMMARY OF DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS
7
B.
POTENTIAL INCREASES TO DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS
9
C.
POTENTIAL REDUCTIONS TO DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS
11
D.
MAJOR OUTYEAR CHANGES FROM A HARD FREEZE
12
E.
ISSUE PAPERS
1.
Prison Growth and Prison Privatization
13
2.
Byrne Grants
26
3.
Funding Level for Justice Law Enforcement Agencies
29
4.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
39
5.
FTE Growth
47
3.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
51
4.
HIGH RISK AREAS
52
5.
SUMMARY OF PAD LEVEL DECISIONS NOT COVERED IN ISSUE PAPERS
59
6.
RELATED SMALL AGENCIES
63
7.
APPENDIX
A.
STREAMLINING PLANS: NPR TARGET POPULATIONS
64
Department of Justice Overview
Reconciling crime control with reducing the size of the Federal government requires difficult choices that must be
addressed this year. The recent crime bill and Congressional reluctance to reduce crime-related programs complicates these
choices. Additionally, any proposed reduction in crime control resources may make the Administration vulnerable to charges of
being "soft on crime." The Justice Department's 1996 request exceeds budget authority ceilings by $2 billion, outlay ceilings by
$.8 billion, and FTE ceilings by 6,000. With some difficulty, the Department can reach 1996 outlay ceilings. However,
dramatic policy changes and painful reductions will be necessary to slow the Department's growth trends.
The PAD recommendation is slightly under the outlay ceiling, but exceeds budget authority ceilings by $.6 billion and
FTE ceilings by 3,300. Essentially, it would continue 1995 policies and eschew initiatives beyond those which the Violent
Crime Reduction Trust Fund (VCRTF) could support. Most of the increases are associated with staffing up newly constructed
prisons. The second largest current services increase is associated with the second year costs associated with the
Administration's 1995 immigration reform initiatives. The third largest current services increase is associated with staff
increases provided by Congress in the context of the 1995 Commerce, Justice, and State Department appropriations bill.
Namely, the Congress increased 1995 staffing for FBI, U.S. Attorneys and DEA (by almost 2,000 FTEs). When these increases
are "annualized" in 1996 (i.e., full year employment of staff that are hired part way through 1995), the 1996 FTEs must rise
higher than the 1995 levels.
Of particular. importance is the issue of Federal prison privatization. In particular, we are pressing DOJ to contract out
prison operations in select circumstances: 1) for prisons yet-to-be-opened, not existing prisons; 2) for minimum and low security
prisons, not medium or high security prisons. If this were accomplished, we could save over 4,000 FTEs by 1999. Admittedly
sparse data suggest that privatization could be expected to save about 20% of Federal costs. Issue paper #1 discusses this issue
in more detail.
Finally, there are two issues that are not part of Justice's request but may be perceived as "commitments" by the
Administration: funding for digital telephony and a new international law enforcement center in Eastern Europe. These issues
are mentioned in the increases above planning guidance.
III-1
AGENCY SUMMARY
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
BA
OL
BA
OL
BA
OL
BA
OL
DISCRETIONARY
FY 1993 Actual/FY 1994 Actual/FY 1995 Enacted
9,391
9,325
9,397
9,721
12,178
10,558
N/A
N/A
April 21st Planning Guidance (Includes $4,287 in BA and $2,334 in OL from VCRTF)
13,573
12,535
FY 1996 Agency Request (Includes $3,846M in BA and $2,163M in OL from VCRTF for DOJ)
15,555
13,375
FY 1996 PAD Recommended Level (Includes $3,955M in BA and $2,167M in OL from VCRTF for DOJ)
14,170
12,505
Percentage Change PAD Rec. from:
FY 1993 Actual
51%
34%
FY 1994 Actual
51%
29%
FY 1995 Enacted
16%
18%
April 21st Planning Guidance
4%
-0%
Agency Request
-9%
-7%
MANDATORY
FY 1993 Actual/FY 1994 Actual/FY 1995 Enacted
1,099
844
894
1,210
1,375
1,427
N/A
N/A
FY 1996 Agency Request
1,446
1,519
FY 1996 PAD Recommended Level
1,433
1,510
AGENCY TOTAL
FY 1993 Actual/FY 1994 Actual/FY 1995 Enacted
10,491
10,169
10,291
10,931
13,553
11,985
N/A
N/A
FY 1996 Agency Request
17,001
14,894
FY 1996 PAD Recommended Level
15,603
14,015
All estimates exclude "Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund" (VCRTF) programs outside the jurisdiction of DOJ (e.g. Treasury, HHS, ED). For these
estimates, refer to separate presentation on Crime Bill funding.
III-2
STREAMLINING PLAN STATUS
FTE SUMMARY
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
FY 1997
FY 1998
FY 1999
FY 1993/ FY 1994 FTE/ FY 1996 Budget Request
94,650
97,230
103,511
110,110
114,877
117,902
119,460
Planning Guidance
93,748
103,800
102,600
101,400
100,200
PAD Recommendation
107,046
107,209
108,404
108,181
Streamlining Plan
103,511
107,385
108,918
107,359
103,514
Buyouts DOJ would like (No. of separations, FY 1995 only)
*382
Difference between Budget Request and:
Planning Guidance
6,310
12,277
16,502
19,260
PAD Recommendation
3,064
7,668
9,498
11,279
Explanation;
84% of the PAD recommended FTE increase is attributable to growth in FTEs associated with federal prisons. 16% of the increase is attributable
to growth in Border Patrol and INS (1996 only). DOJ indicates that is is unable to cut FTE any further given Crime Bill responsibilities.
DOJ's streamlining plan is divorced from its 1996 budget request, as explained in the Summary Assessment of DOJ's plan. The streamlining
request estimates cannot be directly compared with the PA'D recommendation.
# None allowed by OMB to date. However, we understand that Civil Division has processed about 100 unathorized 1995 buyouts (begun in 1994,
but offered in 1995).
III-3
STREAMLINING PLAN STATUS
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT
The streamlining plan keys off a current services baseline, exclusive of requested 1996 program increases. However, DOJ's 1996
budget request includes substantial increases to the 1995 enacted level. Therefore, a "disconnect" exists between DOJ's 1996 request
and its proposed streamlining plan. Any program increase would require offsetting reductions in addition to those contained in the
streamlining plan.
The plan does not offer substantial FTE savings from automation /information technology enhancements, nor does it offer substantial
FTE savings from delayering or field structure reorganization. For example, INS states that it will automate some of its inspection
tools and application processing operations, resulting in a savings of 85 FTE in 1996. As far as delayering, the Department states
that it is conducting a major field study that will "examine possible areas of fragementation or duplication among field offices." In
general, when DOJ references a streamlining initiative, whether enhancing automation, delayering or shifting staff from administrative
roles to the front line, they leave out specific, substantial associated savings.
The plan delays the bulk of reductions -- and the hard decisions -- until the outyears. For example, the plan for the FBI provides few
specifics and delays over 1,300 of its cumulative 1,850 FTE reduction allocation to FY 1999.
The Justice Department has made some improvements to its initial streamlining submission, but the plan does not bring DOJ
resources in line with OMB ceilings for budget authority, outlays, or FTE. The new plan is filled with references to studies that will be
undertaken to determine if streamlining measures are appropriate and what savings, if any, might be realized. The plan relies heavily
on steps already taken or in progress, such as the transfer of agents to the field or establishment of a single office to coordinate the
FBI and the DEA. The Department continues to assert that due to its responsibilities under the crime bill it will be unable to meet
resource ceilings under any reasonable set of circumstances.
The plan does not meet the NPR goal of 50% reduction in headquarters staff. The U.S. Marshals, Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and
Executive Office for Immigration Review plan reductions ranging from 16% to 42% in accounting, auditing, budget and personnel
staff. But most components do not reflect any reductions in headquarters staff. The plan makes only passing reference to
procurement reform.
Under the plan, the Department never reaches NPR's target supervisory ratio of 1:15. By 1999, the Department reaches only 1:8.5.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Each of these recommendations is explained in greater detail in subsequent exhibits:
DOJ could privatize new low and minimum security prisons coming on line in 1996. (See Issue Paper on Prisons)
DOJ could redirect resources to higher level crime fighting and crime-fighting technology improvements. (See Exhibit 10 on FTE Growth)
III-4
RECOMMENDATIONS, con't.
DOJ could reduce the need for prison hiring by linking prosecution policy to incarceration policy. (See Exhibit 10 on FTE Growth)
DOJ could aggresively delegate civil litigation to attorneys based in other agencies. (See Exhibit 10 on FTE Growth)
KEY FEATURES OF PLANS AND DISCUSSION
BOP would decrease prison overcrowding from 132% now to 115% by 1999; however, this would fall short of BOP's goal of no
overcrowding by 1999. This would result in a savings of 1,328 FTE annually. This number is largely due to constructing fewer prisons
in the outyears. The plan does not addess consolidating administrative personnel outside of prison facilities, a measure that would
save FTE.
The U.S. Marshals have made the firmest commitment to take specific steps to reduce workyear consumption on a non-trivial
basis. The Service will save 141 FTE annually by eliminating all intermittent Deputies and temporary staff. Through normal attrition,
the Service will reduce its headquarters staff by 159 FTE on an annual basis.
The INS and BOP will "explore" privatization of detention facilities as an FTE savings measure. However, BOP remains basically
opposed to privatizing anything other than detention facilities. Privatization of prison facilities would save FTE if DOJ--and BOP in
particular--would commit to this effort. See "Recommendation" section.
DOJ is developing an Automated Booking Station that will speed prisoner processing, improve utilization of law enforcement data
and track an offender through the entire criminal justice system. However, DOJ does not link this proposal or many of its other
automation proposals to any substantial FTE reductions.
The recently created Office of Investigative Agency Policies (OIAP) (under Director Freeh) coordinates criminal investigative
agencies. DOJ has highlighted the creation of this office as a streamlining measure, but it may be simply an additional layer of
bureaucracy. DOJ's plan lists "potential" areas for consolidation of procedures in addition to the OIAP, but lists very few actual
savings.
The INS and the Customs Service are establishing joint performance standards to measure and track effectiveness of cross-
designations and to maximize staffing.
III-5
DISCRETIONARY INVESTMENT PROPOSALS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(Includes Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund)
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993
FY1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
President's
Recom.
Discretionary:
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
less
Actual
Actual
(FY95 BUD)
Enacted
(FY95 BUD)
Request
Recom.
Request
Community Policing
BA
150
25
1720
1300
2070
1882
1882
---
OL
8
88
444
348
1074
924
924
---
Recommendation fully funds the investment at maximum level authorized in the Crime bill. Will provide adequate resources to
continue the path towards 100,000 new police officers on the street by 1999. Only A++ investment.
Criminal Records Upgrades
BA
---
--
100
100
100
100*
25
-75
(Brady BIII)
OL
--
---
22
22
57
60
44
-16
Recommendation fully funds the investment at maximum level authorized in the Crime bill. $25 million should be sufficient funding to
fully support the initiative In 1996, for three reasons: 1) drawdown of available funds has been slow (actual needs still unclear); 2)
Byme grants are eligible for this purpose, and 3) Crime Bill provides another $25M in FY 1997.
Border Security and Illegal
BA
-
--
300
284
350
375
375
--
Immigration Initiatives
OL
-
--
255
165
328
308
308
-
Recommendation fully funds investment at maximum level authorized in the Crime Bill. Includes $325M for
INS, $33M for the Executive Office of Immigration Review, $9M for the US Attorneys and $8M for the Civil Division.
Other Justice
BA
---
-
303
661
1767
1586
1673
87
Crime Bill Programs
OL
---
--
44
126
883
899
889
-10
This item represents the remaining Department of Justice Crime bill programs supported from the VCRTF. See VCRTF
presentation for listing of specific programs. Does not include Non-DOJ agency funding from VCRTF.
Total, Discretionary
BA
-
-
2423
2345
4287
3943
3955
12
OL
---
-
765
661
2342
2191
2165
-26
.
Justice requested $11 million for Criminal Records Upgrade from the VCRTF and $88 million from non-Trust Fund sources (in base budget).
III-6
SUMMARY OF DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(INCLUDES VIOLENT CRIME REDUCTION TRUST FUND RESOURCES)
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
President's
Recom.
Discretionary:
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
less
Actual
Actual
(FY 95Bud)
Enacted
(FY 95Bud)
Request
Recom,
Request
Federal Prison System and Detention
Prisons Salaries and Expenses
BA
1743
1950
2407
2352
2839
2887
2664
-224
OL
1702
1878
2267
2220
2764
2706
2516
-190
Prisons Construction
BA
194
270
191
276
141
401
326
-75
OL
449
604
589
598
613
527
520
-8
Support of U.S. Prisoners
BA
268
313
370
297
370
367
297
-71
OL
267
230
337
293
360
356
314
-42
Justice Assistance
Byrne Grants
BA
408
408
125
500
125
550
310
-240
OL
375
390
280
360
240
355
300
-55
All Other
BA
409
272
240
265
240
1639
1564
-75
Office of Justice Programs
OL
275
456
300
209
215
956
933
-23
Law Enforcement and Criminal Investigations
Federal Bureau of Investigation
BA
2019
2062
2159
2204
2085
2588
2316
-271
OL
1975
2008
2012
1985
2096
2324
2121
-204
Drug Enforcement
BA
742
737
724
757
772
876
792
-84
Administration
OL
783
621
665
690
785
786
722
-63
Organized Crime Drug
BA
385
382
370
375
350
389
375
-14
Enforcement Task Forces
OL
463
376
403
406
355
413
402
-11
U.S. Marshals
BA
338
341
366
397
366
469
460
-9
OL
314
368
370
398
366
470
462
-8
III-7
SUMMARY OF DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(INCLUDES VIOLENT CRIME REDUCTION TRUST FUND RESOURCES)
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
President's
Recom.
Discretionary:
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
less
Actual
Actual
(FY 95Bud)
Enacted
(FY 95Bud)
Request
Recom,
Request
Immigration
Immigration and Naturalization
BA
978
1051
1499
1407
1450
1547
1453
-94
OL
1016
1073
1330
1243
1324
1407
1332
-75
Major Litigating Divisions
U.S. Attorneys
BA
797
818
830
844
830
938
884
-54
OL
728
823
815
827
830
916
867
-49
General Legal Activities
BA
496
519
540
520
433
514
437
-77
OL
503
509
530
513
433
504
436
-68
Antitrust Division
BA
42
50
42
41
42
47
43
-4
OL
40
51
40
39
43
43
40
-3
Other
Radiation Exposure
BA
171
---
...
30
16
16
-0
Compensation Trust Fund
OL
59
43
30
30
80
46
46
-0
Other
BA
2611
2384
4471
4187
4471
4972
4392
-581
OL
2813
2605
3267
3162
3267
4087
3839
-248
Total, Discretionary
BA
9391
9397
12513
12176
12714
15555
14170
-1385
OL
9325
9721
10890
10556
11296
13370
12505
-865
Discretionary Planning
Guidance
BA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
13573
...
---
---
OL
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
12535
---
...
---
III-8
POTENTIAL INCREASES
TO DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993 FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
President's
Potential
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
Potential
Increas. less
Actual
Actual
(FY 95Bud)
Enacted
(FY 95Bud)
Request
Recom.
Increases
Pad Recom.
Discretionary:
Priority #1:
Increase Border Enforcement
BA
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
52
+ 52
OL
---
---
---
---
---
---
41
+41
PAD recommends this program increase to fund immigration initiatives if the Administration decides not to adopt the Border Crossing Fee
recommendation to collect the fee and to fund enforcement programs with this fee. PAD recommends + $34M to hire 350 new border patrol
agents and 100 new inspectors. PAD also recommends + $18M to fund 1,010 additional detention bedspaces to detain 15,000 addtional
apprehended aliens; purchase 370 sensors and 6 night vision viewing devices. These investments would increase INS' illegal immigration
control capability and facilitate legal crossings.
Priority #2:
FBI Digital Telephony
BA
---
---
...
---
---
230
+230
---
---
OL
---
---
---
---
---
---
230
+230
Provides full funding required for FBI digital telephony initiative. Would include $230M estimated by the FBI to be necessary in 1996 for carrier
reimbursement as authorized in telephony legislation. More Measured Alternative: $125M or one-fourth of four year $500M authorization.
Priority #3:
Immigration Emergency Fund
BA
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
75
+75
OL
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
The Administration has experienced several immigration-related emergencies such as Chinese alien smuggling, Haitian and Cuban mass migrations.
A potential source of funding increased costs due to unforeseen emergencies is the Immigration Emergency Fund. The Fund also provides for
reimubrsements to States for certain authorized activities.
Priority #4:
Increase Byrne Formula Grants
BA
358
358
75
450
75
450
260
450
+ 190
OL
358
358
250
365
230
362
320
362
+ 42
Provides $190M to increase Byrne formula grant funding to 1995 enacted levels. Alternative: $98M increase over PAD Rec. + $22M in OL) to
fund the formula program at 1994 enacted levels.
III-9
Priority #5:
Open Additional Prisons
BA
1743
1950
2407
2352
2839
2874
2670
2738
+ 98
OL
1702
1878
2267
2220
2764
2706
2497
2577
+80
Provides full funding for DOJ request for agency new prisons in 1996.
Priority #6:
Upgrade JCON Procurement
BA
27
22
23
23
23
31
23
31
+9
OL
24
23
22
22
23
30
23
30
+7
The Justice Consolidated Office Network (JCON) procures software, hardware and services to consolidate existing three separate office
automation systems in the litigating organizations. All three systems are obsolete and nearing the end of contract and useful life. JCON will
include word processing, electronic mail, calendar/scheduling, access to legal research services and access to expanded databases. With
the increase, conversion to JCON would be complete in May 1996.
Priority #7:
Increase Prison Construction
BA
194
270
191
276
141
401
326
381
+ 55
OL
449
604
589
597
613
527
520
526
+6
Provides additional $15M for prison expansion, $6M for boot camps, and $33M for general modernization of existing facilities.
Priority #8:
Increase Detention Funding
BA
270
312
370
297
370
367
297
367
+ 70
OL
267
230
337
293
360
356
314
356
+ 42
Provides full funding for DOJ request for rental of jail space from State and local government jails. PAD recommendation based on use of carryover
balances that may not be sufficient to sustain detention space rental without transfers from other DOJ appropriations.
Priority #9:
International Law
BA
---
---
---
---
---
---
10
+ 10
---
Enforcement Training Center
OL
---
---
...
---
---
---
8
+8
Provides funding to support an international law enforcement training center consistent with the President's comments to the U.N. General
Assembly on September 26, 1994. DOJ is currently developing this proposal. It has not yet been requested.
III-10
POTENTIAL REDUCTIONS
TO DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
President's
Potential
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
Potential
Reduc . less
Actual
Actual
(FY 95Bud)
Enacted
(FY 95Bud)
Request
Recom.
Reductions
Pad Recom.
Discretionary:
Priority #1:
Border Crossing Fee
BA
---
-
-
--
--
-50
-50
-
-
OL
--
--
-
-
-
---
-40
-40
-
Rationale: If the Administration Imposes a Border Crossing Fee In 1996, DOJ Is estimated to receive $50M. Rather than using the $50M
for program increases, this amount can potentially be used to support ongoing INS programs.
Priority #2:
Discretionary Byrne Grants
BA
50
50
50
50
50
100
50
-
-50
OL
50
50
50
50
50
66
50
39
-11
Rationale: In light of numerous anti-crime programs authorized in the Crime bill, this proposal would eliminate $50M Byrne discretionary grant
program. Currently the program is used by Congress to earmark grant programs and by the AG to promote special anti-crime Initiatives.
Priority #3:
Prison Halfway Houses
BA
132
136
192
192
192
224
224
192
-32
OL
127
133
144
144
144
196
196
175
-27
Rationale: DOJ request is over 15% enacted level to move Federal inmates from prisons to halfway houses. GAO has stated that DOJ
has underutilized halfway house space, and that considerable efficiencies could be realized within existing arrangements.
III- 11
MAJOR OUTYEAR CHANGES FROM A HARD FREEZE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
Proposal
FY 1996
FY 1997
FY 1998
FY 1999
FY 2000
Planning Guidance
BA
13,573
14,297
14,708
15,110
N/A
OL
12,535
13,811
14,778
15,713
N/A
Agency Request
BA
15,555
16,985
17,296
18,196
17,398
OL
13,375
16,130
17,474
18,018
18,126
PAD Recommended Level
BA
14,150
14,947
15,128
15,555
14,564
OL
12,503
14,324
15,262
15,661
15,625
Differences between PAD Recommended Level and Planning Guidance:
Adjustment #1
BA
577
650
420
445
N/A
OL
-32
513
484
-52
N/A
Rationale: The 1997 levels reflect a hard freeze on PAD recommendation for 1996 programs. In addition, amounts have
been added to support growth in unavoidable prisoner population growth and the opening of new prisons
(approximately +$300M in each year through 2000). Also, an additional amount has been provided to
increase border enforcement activities if the Border Crossing Fee proposal is not enacted (approximately
+$50M in each year through 2000).
III-12
DISCRETIONARY ISSUE PAPER #1
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
ISSUE:
Prison Growth and Privatization
PREPARER/EXT:
Brad Kyser ext. 54818
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
Pres.
Pres.
Recom.
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
less
Actual
Actual
(FY95BUD)
Enacted
(FY95BUD)
Request
Recom,
Request
BA
1,948
2,230
2,608
2,638
2,990
3,304
3,000
-304
OL
2,143
2,488
2,864
2,658
3,389
3,248
3,048
-200
FTEs
23,539
25,964
28,420
28,657
32,344
31,900
31,525
-375
Performance Measures:
Overcrowding
38%
33%
N/A
27%
16%
15%
22%
Prison Capacity
62,532
62,237
N/A
76,692
88,971
90,724
85,816
OPTION 1: PAD Recommends:
-- Consistent with prior experience, presume significant delays in the opening of six of the 12 prisons under construction with
current estimated opening dates in the latter half of 1996.
-- Contracting out the operations (i.e., FTEs) of all new prisons beginning in 1996, except those classified as medium and high
security.
-- No new starts in prison construction, but provide construction funding for the remainder of those projects initiated with 1995
design funding ($164M in construction funds).
III-13
OPTION 2: DOJ Requests:
-- Opening in 1996 all 12 facilities currently scheduled for opening in 1996. Assume no significant slippages.
-- Continuing to staff all prisons with Federal employees.
-- Complete funding for those new construction projects for which design funding was provided in 1996.
DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE: The three basic components of the prison issue that require decisions for the 1996 Budget: (1)
funding levels for opening new prisons in 1996; (2) whether to save dollars and/or FTE by privatizing all or part of the
operations of prisons under construction but not yet opened; and (3) how much the 1996 Budget should propose for new prison
construction.
Funding levels: The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has sustained huge increases in prisoner population, requiring increasingly large
amounts of resources to house and feed. Over $2B has been provided for the construction of new prison space since 1990.
About 30 new prisons have already been funded and are in various stages of completion in the 1995-1996 period. Over the next
five years these prisons are scheduled to incarcerate over 28,500 additional inmates, expanding Federal prison space by about
35%. The costs of opening these prisons is considerable because it requires not only equipping the new prisons but it also
requires staffing, training and other related personnel costs. In 1996 Justice has requested $195M to open twelve facilities near
completion. Also, $177M is required in 1996 to annualize the costs of facilities that will be opened in 1995.
Privatization: The companion issue to the costs of opening these 30 prisons is the FTE requirements. These 12 prisons alone
require over 2,400 new FTE by 1997. To help meet the overall requirement to reduce the Federal workforce, contracting out
the operations of these and other yet-to-be-opened prisons would, in the view of OMB staff, achieve both-funding and FTE
savings.
Construction: The last part of the prison question is new prison construction beyond the 30 new facilities already funded.
ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Funding levels: BOP has been slow to open new prisons for which construction funding has been provided. On average, prison
openings are delayed over 9 months compared to the estimates provided in the annual DOJ budget submissions. The PAD
recommendation to "delay" the opening of the prisons more realistically reflects that new prisons scheduled to open in the last
half of the fiscal year will probably slip to 1997. The 1996 savings compared with the DOJ request, is $98M. The
recommendation is not intended to keep prisons from opening. Rather, it represents a technical reestimate. The risk, of course,
is that prisons that are ready to open could stand vacant for up to six months.
III-14
Privatization: Many States have contracted with private firms specializing in incarceration. Their experience indicates that
private operation of Federal prisons may cost up to 20% less than staffing the prison with Federal employees. (See attached
discussion paper on this topic.) BOP is a very traditional organization that believes the culture it has created and the security it
has sustained would be vulnerable if operations were to be contracted out. It contends that its good management record for
sentenced prisoners stems from an almost military point of view that all staff are corrections officers foremost, and it is
following the prescribed rules and regulations that ensure discipline and order. Accordingly, BOP strongly resists privatizing the
operations of new prisons.
Under pressure to streamline, BOP has agreed to a pilot privatization of one new detention facility rather than privatize
any of the 30 new prison opening in the next several years to house sentenced inmates. BOP would prefer privatization
detention space, in part, because it believes that its primary mission is securing sentenced prisoners. BOP fears that some of its
good management record may be imperiled if prison operations are contracted out. (Note: Detention space houses inmates prior
to their sentencing. As a result, detention spaces are not grouped by security levels as in regular prisons, and different
population management issues are involved.)
The argument for privatization is based on dollar and FTE savings, and is not intended to reflect on BOP's operations. It is true
that BOP has an excellent record in population management. The PAD recommendation is to request BOP to contract out the
staffing of all minimum and low security prisons that are due to open between 1996 and 1999. The FTE savings by the year
2000 would be about 4,000 FTE. These reductions are assumed in the PAD FTE recommendations. No funding reductions are
yet assumed, however. Medium and high security prison would be excluded from this mandate. DOJ/BOP is likely to react
strongly and negatively to this recommendation.
Construction: As stated above, BOP has 30 new prisons in the pipeline. In the past several years, some construction projects
have been recommended in the budget with two stage funding: architecture and design funding, followed a year later with
construction funding. The 1995 Budget recommend two of these projects (in California, $108M and in Texas, $65M). No new
federal prisons would be presumed for 1997-2000. Comparatively, DOJ requests five new facilities costing nearly $300M.
III-15
Federal Prison Population, Staffing, and Overcrowding
140
100%
120
80%
100
60%
80
Thousands
60
40%
Percent overcrowding
40
20%
20
0
0%
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Federal prison population
Prison Staffing
Overcrowding
Assumes that all prisons will open upon completion of construction.
Does not reflect the impact of the crime bill on inmate population.
Source: 1996 Department of Justice Budget Submission to OMB
III 16
PRISONS RESOURCE GROWTH
Direct Budget Authority (in millions)
$3,500
3,304
Change 1981 - 1996
Nominal Growth
$3,000
2,588
2,638
$2,500
2,230
2,111
1,948
$2,000
1738
1,920
1,562
1,782
$1,500
1,579
1,069
1,355
1,376
4
$1,000
876
1,149
1,222
1,122
613
551
802
434
479
513
Real Growth
$500
372
681
DOJ
439
506
372
404
428
441
Req.
$0
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
III-17
PRISONS OPERATIONS
($3,000M: $2,664 for Prison Operations, *326M for Prison Construction, and $10M for Assistance to States.]
PRISONS OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
1994 Enacted
1,950
Funding increases for BOP S&E has four major components: (1) the full
second year costs of prisons opening in the previous year, (2) the costs of new
1995 Pree. Bud.
2,407
prisons opening during the budget year, (3) the costs of care and feeding of the
increased population, and (4) the costs of confinement arrangements outside regular
prisons in halfway houses.
1995 Appropriations
2,352
The $55M reduction from the request shifts more full year costs for opening prisons to
the second year.
FY 1996
DOJ Request
TCJ Recomm
Mandatory Adjustments
280
219
The mandatory adjustments are largely the full year costs of the 1995 enacted level
for opening new prisons in 1995. The full year costs of the $120M for opening prisons
in 1995 is $177M. The remaining increases are mainly for inflation ($20M) and a
separate inflation amount for increases in contract and other medical costs.
The large full second year costs of opening a prison is a result of delaying the
opening until late in the fiscal year, and paying the full amount in the second year.
Although it creates false savings in the first year, the second year effect is
uncontrollable.
Population Increase
15
15
This cost is based on a prisoner population increase of 8,700, from 91,890 in 1995 to
100,627 in 1996. BOP estimates of population growth have been quite accurate over
the past several years. The current population is nearly 87,000.
All Activations
195
97
The $98M reduction assumes 8 six month delay in activations. The BOP track
record has been quite poor on estimating the timing of construction completion.
Contract Confinement
27
27
The full amount is provided for halfway houses as a means to relieve prison
overcrowding by releasing inmates nearing the completion of their sentences into
Medical Increases
facilities to reintegrate them into the community.
and Other Initiatives
18
-47
Recommendation includes a freeze at the 1995 level for institution maintenance; shifts
$13.5M for drug treatment programs to the VCRTF; increases medical services by
$11.2M.
Total Program Changes
535
312
Agency Grand Total
2,887
2,664
1996 BA in the 1995 Budget
2,839
CONSTRUCTION AND ASSISTANCE TO STATES
The construction budget includes over $130M in modernization and repair, and funding for completion of two prisons in the design
phase, as well as funding for holding cells in new courthouses (See issue paper #1 discussion). The assistance to States is
for training and planning assistance to State and local correctional agencies through Prison's National Instiute of Corrections.
III-18
Brad Kyser
Mark Wasserman
PRIVATIZATION OF PRISONS AND DETENTION CENTERS
Summary
Based on experience of States and localities and a comparison of BOP and private contractor costs, contracting out the operation of
the three detention centers and the 17 minimum and low security prisons (14,750 beds) that will be funded during FY 1996-99 could
reduce outlays for these facilities by at least 20 percent and lower FTEs by 4,000. Privatization could be achieved while maintaining
the current high quality of confinement.
Trends in Privatization
During the past decade, private firms have played a growing role in the operation of detention facilities and prisons. In 1983, the
private prison industry did not even exist. By June 1994, private firms operated 40,329 beds in 78 secure adult correctional facilities
in the United States. Rapid growth is expected to continue in the coming years as governments turn to private firms to provide prison
space quickly and at a lower costs than the public sector [see chart].
By mid-1994, 19 firms provided private corrections. Correction Corporation of America (CCA) has the largest market share (30
percent of all privately operated beds), followed by Wackenhut Corrections (22 percent), a subsidiary of Wackenhut Corporation,
the world's largest provider of security services, and Concept Inc. (11 percent). Industry revenues in 1994 are about $400 million.
Typically, firms have upper management who have held high level positions in the corrections field, including a former director of
the Bureau of Prisons, as well as former directors of state and military corrections systems and prison wardens at various
governmental levels.
Texas leads the privatization movement, with nearly 20,000 beds under private operation, followed by Florida (3,200) and Tennessee
(3,000). Florida's privatization efforts will be expanded in the coming months as bids are solicited on proposals for four prisons
with a total of 2,370 bed spaces. Other states are also likely to expand private operations of secure facilities next year.
States and counties have contracted out the operation of detention and all levels of secure prison facilities: Although most of the
privatized facilities are low security, contracts have been awarded to private firms to operate medium security prisons in Puerto Rico,
Tennessee, Florida and Louisiana. Detention centers contain a variety of security levels, including maximum security cells, as does
a privately operated women's prison in New Mexico.
III-19
In contrast to States and localities, the Federal Government has restricted its use of privately operated secure facilities almost
exclusively to detention facilities or INS processing centers. Only one Federal prison contract has been awarded, the 1,000 bed
medium security INS/BOP prison at Eloy, Arizona that began operations in July 1994.
Cost Savings
It is likely that private firms can operate new prisons and detention centers less expensively than the Federal government. That
conclusion is based on comparisons of the costs of recent private prison contracts of States with BOP prison costs as well as
evaluations of the cost-savings achieved from contracting in Texas and Florida.
Cost Comparisons: The attached table presents the operating costs for 14 private prisons in four states and the average operating
cost for BOP facilities with comparable levels of security. The daily operating cost per prisoner for medium security privately
operated prisons ranges from $23 to $45. The average FY 1993 BOP cost of confinement for all medium security prisoners was
$42.72 plus an average BOP overhead of $8.67 per day for regional and central offices for a total of $51.39. Thus, the highest
private sector contract for a new medium security facility ($45.24) is 12 percent less than the BOP cost for operating existing facilities
when overhead is included.
The daily operating cost per prisoner for low security prisons in the private contracts surveyed ranges from $26 to $30. By
comparison, the average FY 1993 BOP cost was $43.69 plus $8.67 for overhead, for a total of $52.67. Thus, the highest cost in
private contracts for operating a low security facilities ($29.58) is 44 percent less than those of BOP for existing low security prisons.
-- The cost advantage in favor of private operation is even more favorable in a comparison of two similar security level
prisons in the same geographic area. The BOP low security prison in Beaumont, Texas with 1,536 beds that will be opened in mid-
1996 has an average prisoner cost of $59 per day assuming no overcrowding. Concept Inc. will operate a 1,000 bed low security
prison in Williamson County, Texas beginning in early 1995 at a daily cost to the state of $27.
Additional costs that are hard to quantify are not included in the private contracts or in BOP cost figures. If they were included,
the cost advantage would probably tilt even more in favor of the private contracts.
On the one hand, private contracts still require governmental authorities to exercise supervision of the private contractor's
performance. Typically, one or two prison oversight personnel are assigned to a privately operated prison to ensure appropriate
performance by the contractor. On the other hand, average BOP costs do not include the full retirement outlays for their employees
covered by the Federal Government Retirement Systems. These missing costs are estimated to be about 11 percent of CSRS
employees' wages. In addition, retiree health benefits are not now counted anywhere in the budget but add another 4-5 percent to
the wage and salaries of BOP employees.
III-20
Texas and Florida Experience: The two States with the most private prison beds, Texas and Florida, require that private contracts
achieve cost savings compared with state operation of at least 10 percent in the former state and seven percent in the later. The
contracts awarded have actually achieved even greater savings.
-- The Texas Sunset Advisory Commission studied contracts awarded to CCA and Wackenhut in 1988 for operation of two
500 bed minimum security prisons and concluded that "the private prisons were operating at close to 10 percent below the cost of
a hypothetical equivalent unit run by the state." The savings were 14 percent after inclusion of the firms' tax payments to local
governments.
-- In Florida, 12 proposals were submitted in early 1994 for the two 750 bed medium security prison. Each proposal
achieved at least the 7 percent cost savings. The two winning proposals, one by CCA and one by Wackenhut, each had a 10 percent
cost saving, not including the tax payments to the state and local governments.
On the basis of these and other cost comparisons, one recent analysis concluded that the evidence unequivocally demonstrates
that -- presupposing it exercises reasonable judgment in the preparation of procurement documents, contract preparation, and contract
monitoring -- government can realistically anticipate operating cost savings in the range of 10-20 percent by contacting with the added
benefit of an improvement in the caliber of services it receives." [Charles Thomas, Private Adult Correctional Facility Census,
seventh edition, June 30, 1994]
FTE Savings from Privatization
Three detention centers and 17 low and minimum security Federal prisons for which construction has been funded will open in 1996-
99 and will require funding for equipment and staff. BOP estimates that these facilities will require about 4,077 FTEs for the 14,763
beds. Assuming that BOP would have 77 supervisors overseeing the private contractors (a high estimate) privatization would still
result in a savings of 4,000 FTEs.
III-21
Quality of Confinement
Discussions with corrections experts suggest that privatizing the 20 facilities would not strain the industry's ability to provide high
quality management. That conclusion is based, in part, on the experience of the last 4-1/2 years when the number of beds under
private contract increased by 30,000, a nearly four-fold rise.
Although the evidence is limited, it appears that private firms have been able to provide lower cost incarceration than State and local
governments without falling short on the quality of the services provided. According to the Private Adult Correctional Facility
Census, June 1994, 32 percent of the 78 privately operated secure facilities in the United States have been accredited by the American
Correctional Association and another 34 percent are in the process of obtaining accreditation or will do so when construction of the
facility is completed. All of the 14 prisons surveyed in the attached cost table have or will obtain ACA accreditation.
Studies comparing the quality of confinement in private and public facilities are few, but have been favorable to the private firms.
A 1987-88 study conducted by the Urban Institute of two privately operated and two publicly operated facilities concluded that private
facilities provided better quality confinement measured by a range of performance indicators. A 1992 study by Charles Logan of
a private prison, a state prison and a Federal prison using the BOP Prison Social Climate Survey concluded that the private prison
provided higher quality of confinement than either the State or Federal prisons.
Reasons Not to Privatize
Three plausible arguments might be made as to why the Federal government might not want to privatize the operation of prisons and
detention centers. First, there has not yet been a thorough evaluation of cost savings that might be achieved by privatization. A
preliminary evaluation by Justice (not yet officially released) provides limited evidence that private costs might be lower, but the
analysis is far from complete and primarily relies on BOP costs of existing facilities rather than the costs of new facilities. On May
6, 1994, OMB requested the Assistant Attorney General for Administration to undertake a study of the savings that might be achieved
by privatization, but no response has been forthcoming. Second, the evidence that private firms can provide high quality confinement,
such as that currently provided by BOP, is even more limited. There have been very few such studies. The fact, however, that
Texas and Florida have expanded their use of private contractors suggests that authorities in those states are satisfied with the cost
and quality of service that they are purchasing.
III-22
Third, it has been argued that, as a matter of principle, prison guards and administrators must be public employees. As one widely
regarded expert wrote, "The administration of prisons and jails involves the legally sanctioned exercise of coercion by some citizens
over others. This coercion is exercised in the name of the offended public. The badge of the arresting police officer, the robes of
the judge, and the state patch of the corrections officer are symbols of the inherently public nature of crime and punishment." [John
Dilulio, No Escape: The Future of American Corrections, 1992] It can be argued, however, that currently the Federal government
uses privately operated detention centers, halfway houses and even a prison. What matters is not whether the employees of these
institutions are on private or public payrolls. What matters is that they are properly carrying out the incarceration orders of the
courts.
A final reason for not privatizing the operation of Federal prisons is that such a change would be strenuously opposed by BOP and
by unions. Both organizations would lose some of the jobs, power and control that accompany staffing of Federal correctional
facilities. They would argue that BOP currently provides high quality of confinement in a cost-efficient manner. The single
integrated structure of BOP assures uniformity of prisoner treatment throughout the Federal system. This single uniformity of
treatment could not be assured, it could be argued, if some prisoners and prisons were managed by private firms while others were
managed by BOP.
Conclusion
Privatization of the operation of new Federal prisons and detention centers can reduce spending, as well as FTEs, while delivering
high quality confinement. Privatization, however, will require a change in the goals of the BOP. It would need to relinquish the
responsibility for directly operating these prisons and take on the new role of overseeing, evaluating, and, if need be, correcting the
operations of private contractors. Based on the experience and evidence available, considerable benefits can be realized by privatizing
future BOP facilities.
III-23
Secure Private Corrections Facility Beds
(Federal, State and Local Detention Centers and Prisons)
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993 June 1994
III-24
Survey of Prison Operating Costs
(Daily Cost per Prisoner)
Costs Operator
Description
Medium Security
$42.72
BOP/Federal Prison System
Average cost FY 93, excluding Central and Regional
Office overhead
$28.50
Concept Inc.
Contract with BOP/INS, Eloy, Az. 1000 beds opened 7/94
$45.24
Wackenhut
Glades Cnty, Fl.
750 beds opens 6/95
$43.79
CCA
Panama City, Fl. 750 bed opens 7/95
$32.36
CCA
Clifton, Tn. 1336 beds opened 3/92
$23.68
CCA
Winnfield, La. 1,274 beds opened 3/92
$22.81
Wackenhut
Kinder, La. 1,282 beds opened 12/90
Low Security
$43.69
BOP\Federal Prison System
Average cost FY 93, excluding Central and Regional
Office overhead
$29.58
Wackenhut
Kyle, Tx., 520 beds opened 6/89
Bridgeport, Tx. 520 beds opened 8/89
$29.18
CCA
Venus, Tx. 520 beds opened 9/89
Cleveland, Tx. 520 beds opened 9/89
$28.00
Concept
Overton, Tx. 500 beds opens 2/95
$27.55
Wackenhut
Lockhart, Tx. 500 beds opened 9/93
$26.63
Concept
Williamson Cnty, Tx. 1,000 beds opens 2/95
$25.53
Wackenhut
Lockhart, Tx. 500 beds for women opens 10/94
Source: Data provided by CCA, Wackenhut and Concept Inc. Operating costs include loose furniture,
fixtures and equipment. BOP costs do not include overhead or the full costs of retirement and
health benefits.
III-25
DISCRETIONARY ISSUE PAPER #2
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
ISSUE:
Byrne Grants
PREPARER/EXT:
Chris Brown x53730
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
Pres.
Pres.
Recom.
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
less
Actual
Actual
(FY95BUD)
Enacted
(FY95BUD)
Request
Recom.
Request
Byrne Grant Program
BA
408
408
125
500
125
550
310
-240
OL
375
390
280
360
240
355
300
- 55
BA-Formula
358
358
75
450_/1
75
450_/2
260_/2
-190
BA-Discretionary. 50
50
50
50
50
100
50
- 50
/1 All of which is derived from the VCRTF.
/2 DOJ requests $260M from the VCRTF and $190M from general funds. PAD recommends only the VCRTF component.
OPTION 1: PAD RECOMMENDATION
Cuts Byrne grants by $190M from 1995 enacted. $260M is provided for the formula
portion of the program to allow States to continue support of top priority enforcement
programs, particularly law enforcement task forces. The $260M is provided from the VCRTF
and fully funds the Byrne authorization contained in the Crime bill. $50M is provided to
support the discretionary component of the program to allow the AG to continue development
of innovative crime and drug control programs.
OPTION 2: AGENCY REQUEST
The request funds the formula program at $450M, last year's appropriated level. $100M
is requested for discretionary grants (+$50M over 1995 enacted). The request is intended
to avoid Congressional criticism by funding the formula grants at last year's level and
provide the AG additional resources to support innovative crime control programs
(discretionary increase).
III-26
DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE:
In the FY 1995 budget, the Administration proposed the virtual
elimination of the Byrne formula program. Its non-targeted nature, the provision of $1.7B
for the Community Policing/100,000 Cops program, and tight budget constraints made Byrne
grant cuts logical in order to meet 1995 DOJ funding ceilings.
Congress did not take kindly to the Byrne elimination proposal. The main
Congressional concern was the lack of support for multi-jurisdictional law enforcement
task forces. These task forces (about $130M annually) are particularly popular in rural
areas. In the end, the 1995 CJS Appropriations bill appropriated $450M for formula
grants, a +$92M increase over the 1994 level and +$375M over the President's request.
The Department of Justice is very wary of again proposing a reduction in the Byrne
program. DOJ thinks it unfairly got "beat up" in appropriations hearings and therefore,
will vehemently oppose a reduction in Byrne funding in 1996. Finally, because of the
anti-drug focus of these grants, ONDCP has been a strong supporter of the program.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND:
Formula Grant Portion
In 1995, $450M was appropriated for the Byrne program to provide formula grants to
States. All states receive a minimum allocation with the remaining resources distributed
based on population. A percentage of these grants must be used for local projects in each
State. Although much discretion is given to the States in how to use grant monies,
formula grant resources primarily fund programs that include:
- crime and drug task forces (37%)
- corrections/drug treatment (16%)
- demand reduction/crime prevention (9%)
- improved information/technology (8%)
The formula grant program evaluation currently focuses on ensuring that States
develop and/or enhance their capacity to monitor, measure, and evaluate the impact of
Byrne dollars on their State-wide drug strategies. IG reports have consistently
concluded, however, that the extent of the evaluation program is inadequate. Other than
ensuring that States are spending Byrne grant dollars in ways consistent with authorizing
statutes, DOJ itself does little in the way of effectiveness measurement or evaluation for
III-27
the Byrne program as a whole. Since extensive flexibility is given to States in their use
of formula grants, comparing the effectiveness of funding between individual programs and
even among States would be difficult.
Discretionary Portion
The remaining $50M is used to support new and proven innovative programs that can
have a nationwide effect on State and local criminal justice systems. Extensive
Congressional earmarking, however, has always limited the ability of the AG to effectively
use these grants. Approximately 50-60% of the funding is used to continue projects
initiated in previous years. Remaining funds are used to address emerging problems and
promote a national crime/drug strategy. Some examples of discretionary programs funded in
1995 are "Weed and Seed", intermediate sanctions/corrections options, and drug prevention
and education programs. As the purpose of discretionary Byrne grants is to evaluate and
promote programs which have a national impact on criminal justice systems, the
discretionary program has been much more successful at developing performance measures
from which to evaluate programs. The measures are generally small in scale and pertain
only to the individual program being funded.
ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION: Similar to last year, the budget environment within the
Department of Justice suggests reducing the Byrne program. This year the pressure may be
even greater, insofar as Justice is having excessive problems meeting its funding
ceilings. Perhaps more importantly, the Crime bill supports a wide variety of programs
which largely replicate those traditionally funded through Byrne. For example, the PAD
recommendations for the VCRTF provide for $3.0 billion in new law enforcement assistance
grants and $240 million for drug courts, prison treatment, and rural drug enforcement.
The PAD recommendation attempts to diffuse Congressional and Department objections to
reducing Byrne grants by proposing $260M for the formula grants and $50M for the
discretionary grants. Simply, the PAD recommendation represents OMB staff's belief of the
minimum resources necessary for Byrne to avoid excessive criticism of the Administration.
III-23
DISCRETIONARY ISSUE PAPER #3
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
ISSUE:
FBI Programs and Funding
PREPARER/EXT:
Chris Brown x53730
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
Pres.
OPT. 1
OPT. 2
OPT. 3
Pres.
Request
Agency
PAD
Current
Actual
Request
Enacted
(FY95BUD)
Request
Recom,
Services
BA
2,063
2,139
2,204
2,085
2,588
2,316
2,335
OL
2,007
1,997
1,985
2,094
2,370
2,121
2,135
FTE
23,986
23,121
24,091
23,121
24,953
24,103
24,583
OPTION 1: AGENCY REQUEST
Current Services:
$123M (480 FTE) for annualization of 1995 program in 1996.
Program Increases:
$122M ( 40 FTE) for internal FBI advanced telephony needs,
$112M (216 FTE) * for infrastructure and other needs, and
$ 27M (126 FTE) to combat Eastern European crime.
OPTION 2: PAD RECOMMENDATION
Current Services:
$123M ( 480 FTE) for annualization of 1995 program in 1996.
Program Increases:
$ 45M
(
0
FTE) for internal digital telephony needs,
$ 18M ( 12 FTE) * for infrastructure and other needs, and
$ OM
( 0 FTE) to combat Eastern European Crime.
Streamlining:
-$ 74M (-480 FTE) to implement streamlining.
OPTION 3: Current Services Only
Current Services:
$123M ( 480 FTE) for annualization of 1995 program.
Program Increases:
$ 8M ( 12 FTE) * for infrastructure and other needs.
Includes $8M and 12 FTE from VCRTF for programs specifically authorized in Crime bill.
Note: Although this paper only deals with FBI, DEA would receive comparable budget treatment.
III-29
DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE: In 1995, the Administration provided modest funding increases over
1994 enacted levels to the DEA and FBI (less than 5%). These increases translated into
FTE reductions for both agencies because DOJ insisted that it needed to increase
substantially facilities and equipment for its staff. Congressional action restored
virtually all the Administration's reductions and provided significant funding and FTE
enhancements as well. The 1995 CJS Appropriation Conference Report specifically provided
for FTEs comparable with peak agent levels reached in 1992. Overall, Congress provided an
increase of approximately 970 FTE in FBI and 284 FTE in DEA over proposed 1995 levels.
The Department of Justice was roundly criticized for this "lack of support for
Federal law enforcement." Attached is a letter from Rep. Mollohan, Chairman of the House
CJS Appropriations Committee, summarizing Congressional sentiment regarding the
preparation of the 1996 Federal law enforcement budget.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: The FBI and DEA have started development of performance measures
but have little information currently available for analysis. Traditionally, Federal law
enforcement has focused on numbers of arrests as the central measurement of performance.
As these old measures are simply functions of the resources put into law enforcement, they
tell us little about the effectiveness of law enforcement programs. Much additional work
is needed. Unfortunately, during budget hearings, FBI provided only a lukewarm response
when asked about future efforts to measure performance in law enforcement. DEA was
slightly more receptive.
Currently, FBI and DEA have pilot programs (four and one, respectively) participating
in the GPRA pilot initiative. In general, their efforts have been successful. However,
the pilots represent the smaller service-oriented functions of the agencies, such as
laboratory services. As these service-oriented functions represent only a small portion
of the agencies, they are only minimally important when measuring overall agency
performance. The larger question, how to measure the performance of agencies with as
broad a mandate as Federal law enforcement, still remains largely undeveloped.
ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATIONS: The issue at hand pits many of the reinventing government
initiatives promoted by the Administration against the realities of appearing strong
against crime. The FBI does not feel that government-wide funding or FTE ceilings should
apply to them. On numerous occasions, Director Freeh has expressed the view that the 1995
President's Budget for FBI was insufficient. He believes that successful crime fighting
is not consistent with the previously mentioned Administration priorities. His argument
is simple -- crime must be addressed and the FBI is the one to do it.
III-30
FBI Request: $122M is requested for FBI operation of an advanced telephony program.
This program includes R&D and equipment for telephony and related costs. The program is
requested to allow law enforcement continued capability to conduct wiretaps, one of the
most effective law enforcement investigative techniques. Recent technology changes in the
telecommunications industry have made wiretaps difficult. The $122M initiative supports
new FBI R&D and equipment purchases to overcome this problem, but not a reimbursement of
the telecommunications industry for equipment modifications, as authorized in the recently
passed digital telephony legislation. A detailed description of the telephony issue is
contained in the attachment to this paper. Given the difficulty in accurately determining
FBI needs due to future technological changes, $16M in unused carryover balances for
telephony, and the flexibility to reprogram within the DOJ, a scaled back initiative
appears justified. PAD REC: $45M for telephony related costs.
The FBI is also requesting $112M and 216 FTE for an infrastructure initiative to hire
more support staff, purchase computer workstations and automobiles, and improve its
foreign language program. The FBI argues that it has insufficient support staff to
maximize the effectiveness of its agents. However, within the law enforcement community,
the FBI has one of the highest support staff-to-agent ratios. The addition of numerous
support staff is also inconsistent with the Administration's streamlining intentions. PAD
REC: $18M for improved automation/computers and other small technology initiatives.
The final major FBI initiative includes $27M and 126 FTE (largely agent FTE) to
combat emerging Eastern European organized crime (EEOC). A small portion of the request
would be used to support the establishment of a Legal attache office in Beijing. Recent
statements from Director Freeh, and in a more limited manner from the President (September
24th in front of the General Assembly of the United Nations and October 17th to the
International Chiefs of Police Conference in Albuquerque) have highlighted U.S. interest
to increase the focus on international criminal groups. Realistically, however, this
focus on EEOC could be accomplished by the FBI through an internal reprogramming of
resources. EEOC is really no different than white collar crime, South American drug
gangs, or Italian crime syndicates. As there is no loss for crime to fight, the EEOC
initiative should be analyzed in tandem with the other crime programs and within the
context of overall funding available for Federal law enforcement. Also, as approximately
$44M and 300 FTE were allocated by the FBI to combat EEOC from the 1995 Congressional
enhancement, the FBI appears to have sufficient growth to successfully incorporate the
targeting of EEOC into current operations. PAD REC: $OM.
The FBI has been very opposed to implementing any kind of streamlining which reduces
overall funding or FTE levels. The FBI believes in reengineering existing practices and
reinvesting any savings or efficiencies into ongoing operations. A prime example of this
III-31
belief is last year's initiative to reallocate 600 agents from headquarters to the field.
Following this action, the FBI argued for additional support FTE to fill the vacated
headquarters positions. Congress provided the FTE. FBI has discussed but not committed
to any further streamlining savings proposals. PAD REC: Imposes a -$74M and -480 FTE
streamlining allowance on the FBI.
VCRTF Impact on the Requests: $63M of the above initiatives are recommended from the
VCRTF. The VCRTF would support major initiatives including: $40M for advanced telephony,
a $5M DNA initiative, and $18M for various other programs authorized in the Crime Bill.
III-32
ATTACHMENT TO ISSUE #3
Discussion of Digital Telephony Problem
Telecommunications systems and networks are universally used by the criminal element
for the furtherance of criminal activities. In turn, one of the most effective tools in
the investigation of crime by Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies is Title
III court-authorized electronic surveillance or "wiretaps".
Since 1968, Federal law enforcement agencies have had the authority, as an
investigative tool of last resort, and with judicial approval, to conduct wiretaps. As
telecommunications signal technology remained relatively constant over the years (analog
technology), law enforcement had little trouble intercepting communication signals.
However, the recent introduction of faster, cheaper, and more efficient digital technology
by the telecommunications industry has made communications much more difficult and
expensive to intercept.
Following an extensive review of the potential difficulties of conducting wiretaps
within the limitations of the new digital technology, the Administration proposed
legislation to mandate that the telecommunications industry assist law enforcement in
ensuring wiretap capabilities. The Digital Telephony and Communications Privacy
Improvement Act of 1994 passed Congress in early October, after extensive negotiations
with industry.
The Act requires telecommunications carriers to provide for law enforcement access to
the content and origin of targeted communications, in an unobtrusive manner, so targets
are not made aware of the interception. The Act allows industry the flexibility to
develop the standards to implement this requirement. In addition, the Act expands privacy
and security protection for telephone and computer communications.
In recognition of the fact that some existing equipment, services or features will
have to be retrofitted by the industry to ensure continued wiretap capability, the
legislation provides that the Federal government compensate industry carriers for "just
and reasonable costs" incurred in modifying existing equipment during a four year
transition period following enactment of the bill. Following this transition period,
industry is then responsible for the costs associated with meeting law enforcement wiretap
needs. Specifically, the Act authorizes a total of $500 million for fiscal years 1995,
1996, 1997, and 1998 and "such sums as are necessary for each year thereafter" for this
reimbursement purpose.
III-33
The $500M reimbursement poses a special problem to the Administration. None of the
interests involved in the telephony initiative, neither the intelligence nor law
enforcement communities, wish to initiate funding requests for the $500 million
reimbursement. Undoubtedly, they fear that requesting a large initiative like this would
exacerbate the already heavy pressure on meeting funding and FTE ceilings. Currently, the
FBI and DOJ refuse to even initiate discussions on how the $500M carrier reimbursement
will be supported. In effect, they are saying that it is an OMB problem to find the
resources. The PAD recommendation does not include this initiative within our ceilings
for DOJ, nor can we find room to fund it given the many other law enforcement priorities.
Preliminary estimates suggest approximately $230M is required for the reimbursement in
1996. The table below summarizes the estimated need for the reimbursement.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: There is little doubt that the increasing use of digital
technology will pose a threat to the ability of law enforcement to conduct court
authorized wiretaps. with only the recent focus on the telephony issue, however, little
performance information is available on the topic. As with performance measures in
general for the FBI, OMB will need to continue pressure to ensure that appropriate
measures are being developed in support of this initiative.
Estimated Requirements for Industry Reimbursement:
($ in millions)
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
BA
40
230
210
20
- -
- -
OL
40
230
210
20
- -
- -
Note: Preliminary Estimates based on FBI projections.
III-34
MAJORITY MEMBERS
MINORITY MEMBERS
WILLIAM H. NATCHER. KENTUCKY, CHAIRMAN
JOSEPH M. McDADE PENNSYL
JAME L WHITTEN, MISSISSIPPL VICE CHAIRMAN
JOHN T. MYERS. INDIANA
"TAL SMITH, IOWA
C.W. BILL YOUNG. FLORIDA
THEY R VATES. ILLINOIS
RALPH REGULA OHIO
VID R OBEY. WISCONSIN
sos LIVINGSTON. LOUISIANA
ARS STOKES. OHIO
rom DEVILL ALABAMA
Congress of the Hnited States
JERRY LEWIS. CALIFORNIA
JOHN EDWARD PORTER ILLINC
JOHN P. MURTHA PENNSYLVANIA
MAROLD ROGERS. KENTUCKY
CHARLES WILSON TEXAS
JOE SKEEN NEW MEXICO
NORMAN a DICKS. WASHINGTON
house of Representatives
FRANK R WOLF. VIRGINIA
MARTIN OLAV SABO. MINNESOTA
TOM DELAY. TEXAS
JULIAN C DOON. CALIFORNIA
JIM KOLBE ARIZONA
VIC FAZIO. CALIFORNIA
w.a. (BILL) MERNER NORTH CAROLINA
Committee on Appropriations
DEAM A GALLO. NEW JERSEY
BARBARA #. VUCANOVICH NEV.
STENY H. HOTER MARYLAND
JM LIGHTFOOT. IOWA
BOB CARR MICHIGAN
RICHARD + DURSIN ILLINOIS
Washington, DC 20515-6015
RON PACKARD. CALIFORNIA
SONNY CALLAHAN, ALABAMA
RONALD a COLEMAN TEXAS
HELEN DELICH SENTLEY. MARYL
ALAM a. MOLLOHAN WEST VIRGINIA
JAMES T. WALSH. NEW YORK
JM CHAPMAN, TEXAS
CHARLES M TAYLOR NORTH CA
MARCY KAPTUR OHIO
September 28, 1994
L HOBSON. OHIO
DAVID E SEAGGS. COLORADO
PENEST JMS ISTOOK. JR OKLAH
DAVID L PRICE NORTH CAROLINA
V BONILLA, TEXAS
NANCY PELOSL CALIFORNIA
ECEIVE
PETER 1 VISCLOSEY. INDIANA
CLERK AND STAFF DIRECTO
THOMAS as FOGUETTA PENNSYLVANIA
FREDERICK a MOHRMAN
ESTEBAN EDWARD TORRES. CALIFORNIA
GEORGE (SUDDY) DARDER GEORGIA
TELEPHONE:
NITA M. LOWEY. NEW YORK
RAY THORNTON ARKANSAS
OCT
?
(202) 228-2771
Jost E. SERRANO. NEW YORK
ROSA L DELAURO. CONNECTICUT
JAMES P. MORAN, VIRGINIA
DOUGLAS "PETE" PETERSON PLORIDA
JOHN W. OLVER MASSACHUSETTS
as PASTOR ARIZONA
CARRIE P MEEK. FLORIDA
Honorable Alice M. Rivlin
Acting Director
Office of Management and Budget
Washington, D.C. 20503
Dear Ms. Rivlin:
III-35
I am writing to ask for your personal assistance in ensuring that
there will not be a repeat in fiscal year 1996 of, what I believe was,
an ill advised decision in the fiscal year 1995 budget request to
recommend reduced funding for Federal law enforcement.
As you know, the Congress not only rejected the Administration's
proposed reductions in fiscal year 1995, but provided sufficient funds
for the FBI and DEA to restore agent staffing back up to the peak
levels reached in 1992. The Congress also added funds above the
request for the U.S. Marshals Service, U.S. Attorneys, and the Byrne
Formula Grant Program. I would note that no other program in our
appropriations bill received as much attention from other Members as
did the Byrne Grants. Unfortunately, the funding to restore these law
enforcement efforts came from other programs in the bill, including the
President's Technology Initiatives. It was. a difficult decision,
personally, to reduce funding for programs to produce high tech jobs;
however, there was no support whatsoever for the proposed reductions to
Federal law enforcement.
I can appreciate the difficulty you face in balancing the overall
Federal discretionary budget; however, I can not emphasize enough the
critical importance of maintaining the funding levels for our Federal
law enforcement agencies. The men and women on the front line of our
efforts against drugs and violent crime must receive the necessary
resources to perform their critical mission.
Honorable Alice M. Rivlin
September 28, 1994
Page 2
I want to congratulate you on your nomination. Like you, I am
also in an "Acting" capacity, but I look forward to working with you.
I hope that, together, we can find the means to continue the
outstanding efforts of our law enforcement agencies.
Sincerely,
Alan B. Mollohan
Subcommittee on the Departments
of Commerce, Justice and State,
the Judiciary and Related Agencies
III-36
FBI RESOURCE GROWTH
Direct Budget Authority (in millions)
$3,000
Change 1981 - 1996
Nominal Growth
2,588
$2,500
Nom. Growth: 280%
Real Growth: 118%
2,204
1,927 1,981 2,042
$2,000
1,684 1,693
$1,500
1,401
1,439
1,298
1,485
1,160 1,156
1,064
1,310
1,249
1,251
1,253
1,167
$1,000
854
1,039
1,078
1,131
1,058
767
981
681
932
959
Real Growth
DOJ
780
681
723
Req.
$500
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
III-37
DEA RESOURCE GROWTH
Budget Authority (in millions)
$1,000
920.1
$900
Change 1981 - 1996
Nom. Growth: 327%
Nominal Growth
799.6
Real Growth: 148%
$800
754.3
769.4
730.0
696.0
$700
585.0
$600
534.4
490.1 494.0
$500
$535
$460
$469
$473
$475
$479
$400
354.0
364.0
$403
$381
$371
$384
291.0
Real Growth
$300
242.7
255.5
DOJ
215.3
$292
$292
Req.
$200
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
III-38
DISCRETIONARY ISSUE PAPER #4
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
ISSUE:
Immigration and Naturalization Service
PREPARER/EXT:
Lin Liu / ext. 53442
FY1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
Pres. Req.
Pres. Req.
Agency
PAD
Rec. less
Actual
Actual
(FY95Bud)
Enacted
(FY95Bud)
Request
Rec.
Request
BA*
1,514
1,650
2,116
2,126
2,188
2,239
2,197
-42
OL
1,551
1,670
1,990
1,790
2,100
2,092
2,075
-17
FTEs
18,179
18,331
20,732
20,582
20,125
21,626
21,450
-176
*
BA total includes four sources of funds: discretionary, VCRTF, existing mandatory, and new mandatory Border Crossing Fees
(BCF). (See attachment 1 for separate discussion of the new BCF proposal and attachment 2 for summary of sources of funds
and program levels).
OPTION 1 Agency Request:
DOJ requests $2,239M for INS. It requests +$144M and 299 FTEs in program increases
for: border controls, asylum reform, criminal alien deportations, immigration status verification, training, research and
development, and attorney pay increases.
OPTION 2 PAD Recommendation:
PAD recommends $2,197M for INS. This is a 3% increase over its 1995
appropriations and a 25% increase over its 1994 budget. It includes +$136M and 434 FTEs in program increases for the
following three major initiatives in 1996: (see analysis/recommendation section for discussion)
I.
+$98M to strengthen border management and enforcement efforts through personnel, automation, and equipment
enhancements.
II.
+$19M to deport an additional 16,400 criminal aliens and link State and local law enforcement agencies with INS.
III.
+$19M to remove up to 20,000 aliens denied asylum and deter organized crime and alien smuggling rings.
III-39
DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE:
Immigration is and will continue to be a "hot button" issue. The 104th Congress is expected to focus even more attention
on immigration problems. The September 30th Jordan Commission Immigration report highlighted employer verification
and border security issues which the Administration will need to continue addressing in the next few months.
The Administration has requested, and Congress has provided, sizable increases for immigration activities. In 1995, the
President proposed major immigration initiatives to improve border controls, reform asylum, deport criminal aliens,
expand employer sanctions investigations, and promote naturalization. Congress appropriated most of the President's
requested increases for immigration initiatives ($255M) through the Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund (VCRTF).
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
INS has lacked adequate performance measures to assist in its improvement efforts. While it is making some efforts to
identify better performance indicators and to quantify outcomes based on resources provided, these efforts are still in the
beginning stages. Historical data for analysis is lacking. INS is focused on developing measurements on how it is doing
with regard to management coordination with Customs, asylum adjudication, and illegal migration prevention efforts.
A recent study by a University of Texas research team provided for the first time a comprehensive review of border
controls, linking INS activities to outcomes. This team studied the results of "Operation Hold the Line" in El Paso (400
additional agents were provided through overtime funds to strengthen deterrence efforts along the El Paso/Juarez area) in
terms of levels of illegal crossings, local crime rate, pressures on ports, etc. The study suggests that this operation was
successful in reducing the ability of routine illegal crossers to penetrate the border patrol "line" and in reducing the level
of petty crimes associated with illegal aliens in the El Paso area. However, the study suggests that the operation was not
as effective in deterring the illegal crossings of longer term migrants who travel beyond the border area. The study also
suggests that the operation's effectiveness is reduced over time.
INS' recently established Policy Division is in the process of contracting out with independent researchers to evaluate
"Operation Gatekeeper" in San Diego (an operation similar to the El Paso experiment in pursuing the goal of "deterrence
through prevention" but with a different concentration of resources to take into account the different terrain and crossing
patterns in the San Diego/Tijuana area). This operation was announced by the Attorney General in September 1994. The
independent analysis is expected to be completed by April, 1995.
III-40
ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION;
The PAD recommendation for INS' 1996 budget continues the Administration's strong commitment to immigration as a priority
issue. The 1996 funding initiatives total $136M ($107 of this amount is requested by DOJ and $29M is a PAD initiative) in
program increases and are focused on strengthening INS' immigration law enforcement capabilities in the following areas:
I.
Enhancing Border Management and Immigration Law Enforcement: +$98M.
A. 350 New Border Patrol Agents and New Equipment ($30M from BCF). Illegal crossings at the SW borders are
considered to be the number one immigration problem, especially for border States such as California and Texas. The
Administration has sought significant resources to strengthen border controls with personnel, automation and equipment.
The 1994 and 1995 enhancements (+1,000 new agents, modern encrypted voice radios, fingerprint identification system,
etc.) have enabled INS to put in place "Operational Hold the Line" in El Paso, "Operation Gatekeeper" in San Diego, and
"Operation Safeguard" in Arizona. In 1996, PAD recommends creating an elite and mobile Special Border Patrol Corp
through the hiring of 350 new agents (+$29M) to focus especially on high risk crossing points in between areas where
current enforcement operations are underway. (This is a PAD initiative -- DOJ did not request funding for new agents in
1996.) PAD also recommends purchase of 370 sensors and 6 night vision viewing devices (+$1M) to help agents locate
and track illegal entrants more efficiently.
B. 100 New Inspectors (+$5M from BCF). The major enforcement operations at SW borders have increased incidence
of illegal crossers attempting to enter through ports using fraudulent documents. (El Paso ports saw a 520% increase in
fraud intercepts right after the Operation Hold the Line began in September 1993. By March 1994 this leveled off to a
67% increase in intercept rates). These new inspectors are expected to increase INS' ability to scruntinize border
crossing documents carefully to prevent unauthorized entries and at the same time faciliate the inspections process to
better serve legal entrants.
C. 1,010 Additional Detention Bedspaces (+$17M from BCF). Apprehended aliens should not be released to the
community if the border control strategy is to present an effective deterrence against further illegal immigration. Because
of shortage of detention space, INS currently releases aliens who would otherwise be held while awaiting deportation.
These aliens are likely to abscond prior to their deportation hearings. Over 1,000 INS detention bedspaces are not used
currently due to inadequate operational funds. By making 1,010 additional bedspaces available with $17M, INS could
detain an additional 15,000 apprehended aliens annually.
III-41
D. Automation Enhancements (+$46M from VCRTF and mandatory appropriations). Resources will be allocated to
develop and deploy systems used to process apprehended illegal aliens, enhance overall access to INS' corporate database,
and modernize INS' infrastructure. New technology will enhance border enforcement also at the airports and overseas
visa issuance offices which are as critical as gaining control over the SW borders for the purposes of controlling illegal
immigration. INS estimates that computerized processing systems can eventually improve overall administrative
efficiency by 75%, thereby freeing Border Patrol agents and others to concentrate on critical enforcement activities.
II.
Tracking and Deporting Criminal Aliens: +$19M.
A. Institutional Hearing Program (+$15M from VCRTF). INS can save detention resources and ensure immediate
removal of criminals by processing these aliens for deportation while they serve their sentences in Federal, State or local
incarceration facilities. The estimated numbers of removals are: 6,000 in 1994, 13,000 in 1995, and 16,400 in 1996.
B. Law Enforcement Service Center (+$4M from VCRTF), The pilot project started in July 1994 to allow Arizona
State to access INS databases to check on the status of aggravated felons. In 1996, INS plans to expand this service to
law enforcement agencies nationwide. This system will enable INS to quickly identify and track criminal aliens and to
ensure their expedited removal through the Institutional Hearing Program.
III.
Deterring Asylum Abuse and Alien Smuggling: +$19M.
A. Removal of Denied Asylum Applicants (+$10M from VCRTF). Regulatory reform and 1995 resource enhancements
will enable INS to double its ability to adjudicate asylum cases by the end of 1995. As asylum cases are completed, those
denied asylum need to be removed to ensure the integrity of the asylum system and to act as a deterrence measure. New
resources will support the removal of up to 20,000 aliens denied asylum.
B. Disruption of Organized Crime and Alien Smuggling Rings (+$9M from mandatory appropriations). Overseas
organized crime organizations threaten our border integrity by smuggling aliens through the use of fraudulent travel
documents. These activities are on the rise because of their tremendous profit potential. INS is an active participant in
efforts with other US government offices, airline officials, and host country governments to pursue an international
immigration law enforcement strategy to identify, deter, and reduce illegal activities.
PAD does not recommend funding requested increases for the following INS initiatives: training (+$6M), attorney pay (+$8M),
research and development (+$2M), and the Verification for Immigration Status (VIS) system (+$1M). PAD strongly
recommends funding the research and development and VIS programs from the INS base.
III-42
Attachment 1
Border Investment Program/Border Crossing Fee Proposal
Problem Statement/Potential Solution
Growth in legal and illegal cross-border traffic is taxing existing border infrastructure and law enforcement
capabilities. This problem is expected to grow, in part as a result of NAFTA.
Investments by INS and Customs in agents, inspectors, equipment, automation, and infrastructure, would address the
problems at the border caused by the growth in cross-border traffic. These investments could help stem illegal
immigration, facilitate cross-border commerce and foster economic growth, and reduce cross-border drug smuggling.
(See below table for an illustrative listing of the potential components of a border investment program.)
Possible Financing Source
It would be difficult to fund a substantial new border investment program under the caps. However, a border
crossing fee could collect $200 to $500 million annually to support needed border investments when fully
implemented in 1998.
A $1 per vehicle or pedestrian would collect $200 million in gross revenues; a fee of $3 per car; and $1.50 per
pedestrian would collect $500 million.
INS and Customs already collect user fees for other purposes. Charging a fee is consistent with the principle applied
to other public infrastructure financing, i.e., facility users support a portion of construction, operation, and upkeep,
through tolls or other charges.
Support/Opposition
A border investment program has received support from Sen. Feinstein, Simpson and Reid; the Congressional Border
Caucus; the Jordan Commission on Immigration Reform; and the NEC's Task Force on Border Infrastructure and
Facilitation. All, except for the Border Caucus endorsed a border crossing fee or similar innovative funding source.
In general, Californians support the fee proposal because they are primarily concerned about illegal immigration.
Texans object the proposal because they are concerned about cross-border commerce.
III-43
Treasury opposes the fee because they foresee an adverse economic impact on border communities, operational
difficulties in its implementation, and political concerns.
State Department believes the imposition of a fee would negatively impact on our relationships with Mexico and
Canada, and result in reciprocal fees.
Potential Components of a 1996 Border Investment Program
(in millions of dollars)
INS:
-
350 new Border Patrol agents
$30
-
100 new INS inspectors
5
-
1,010 detention bedspaces to
detain 15,000 apprehended aliens
16
Subtotal, INS
$51
Customs:
-
Automation to speed inspections
$15
-
Construct new inspection lanes
at land ports
21
-
New inspectors to man
20
new lanes
Subtotal, Customs
$56
TOTAL
$107
Note: In 1996, net receipts are estimated to be $107M for the $3 per car/$1.50 per pedestrian fee after $ 100M in start up
costs. Proposed INS components are described in more detail in the Analysis/Recommendation section of this issue
paper.
III-44
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE - 1996 BUDGET REVIEW
Attachment 2
FY 1996
Summary of
Delta from Rec.
Program Levels
FY 94
FY95
DOJ
PAD
FY11995
1926
Actual
Enacted
Request
Rec.
Enacted
Change
USES OF FUNDS
TOTAL INSBA
1,650
2,126
2,239
2197
71
3%
PAD RECOMMENDATION
TOTALINSETED
18331
20582
21,626
21,450
868
4%
A. Inspections
253
314
347
347
33
9%
Inspectors staff land, sea, and air ports to facilitate legitimate and prevent unauthorized entries.
(24.1%) Border Patrol
B. Border Patrol
385
459
507
527
68
13%
Border Patrol agents secure the border between land ports to prevent the entry of illegal crossers.
(15.9%) Inspections
(2.4%) Investigations
C. Investigations
157
174
186
186
12
6%
Investigators support the INS' employer sanctions, criminal alien, and alien smuggling control activitie
(1.8%) Construction and Others
(13.7%) Detention & Deportation
D. Detention & Deportation
233
260
313
299
40
13%
(8.4%) Management/Legal
INS detains aliens likely to abscond to ensure their eventual deportation.
(98%) & Benefits
E. Citizenship & Benefits
167
193
216
216
23
11%
(17.8%) Information Systems
Adjudication of various benefits (naturalization, adjustment of status, etc.) and asylum applications.
F. Information Systems
244
380
412
392
12
3%
INS systems (CLAIMS, ENCATS, RAPS, etc.) support the various enforcement and benefits programs.
G. Manage/Legal/IEF
175
260
211
194
-66
-34%
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Overall INS management and legal support. Immigration Emergency Fund provides contingency funds.
PAD RECOMMENDATION
H. Others
36
87
47
36
-51 -141%
Construction, training, and intelligence components in support of INS programs.
Summary of
FY 94
FY95
FY 96
Funding Sources
Request
Rec.
(5135) Discretionary Appropriation
Discretionary
1,051
1,152
1,222
1,128
Existing Mandatory
593
644
692
692
VCRTF
0
255
325
325
Immigration Emergency
6
75
0
0
(2.4%) New Bonder Fee
New Border Crossing Fee
0
0
0
52
TOTAL
1,650
2,126
2,239
2,197
(14.8%) VCRTF Appropriation
III-45
(31.5%) Mandatory Appropriation
INS RESOURCE GROWTH
Direct Budget Authority (in millions)
2500
2,239.0
Change 1981 - 1996
126.0
2000
Nominal Growth
1,650.0
1,514.0
1,444.0
1500
1,260.0
1,135.3
1,175.5
1,010.3
$1,202
1000
$1,105
822.9
$1,041
$927
$950
592.0
571.0
$815
$809
$833
511.0
$758
501.0
500
446.0
$640
366.0
Real Growth
$415
$448
$438
$488
$457
DOJ
$366
Req.
0
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
III-46
DISCRETIONARY ISSUE PAPER #5
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
ISSUE:
Growth in Justice Department Workyears
PREPARER/EXT:
Adrien Silas ext. 53589
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
Request
FTE
Agency
PAD
Less
Actual
(FY95BUD)
Enacted
Ceiling
Request
Recom.
Req.
FTE
97,230
101,940
103,511
103,800
110,110
107,046
-3,064
OPTION 1: Agency Request: The Agency requests a total increase of approximately 6,600 workyears over 1995 and 6,300
above ceiling. Includes 4,200 to annualize FTE associated with initiatives funded in 1995, including 2,473 FTE associated with
prisons. The major programmatic workyear increases would staff 1996 newly activated prisons (+750 FTE for Federal Prisons);
increased investigation of emerging organized crime and increased law enforcement support staff (+383 FTE for the FBI);
increased prosecution of violent crime, health care fraud, and affirmative civil litigation (+245 FTE for the U.S. Attorneys); and
strengthening border management and establishing an institutional hearing program to expedite removal of criminal aliens from
Federal and State prison (+272 FTE for the INS).
OPTION 2: PAD Recommendation: The staff recommendation would hold FTE to aggregate 1995 levels in most accounts
other than those in the prison system (annualizations and 414 in new FTE, associated primarily with staffing up newly
constructed prisons) and the Immigration and Naturalization Service (annualizations and 434 new FTE, most of which is
associated with staffing up the Border Patrol). This would mean few workyear program increases for the FBI and the DEA.
III-47
For the outyears, option 2 assumes substantial savings through aggressive and dramatic actions to restructure the Department and
control workyear consumption. The staff assumes incremental savings of 500 workyears each year, beginning in 1997. We also
assume that the Department would privatize most bankruptcy trustee functions, beginning in 1997. By the year 2000, the savings
would be 2,000 FTE, compared to a rising FTE baseline. Major categories of savings would include:
Shifting resources to pursue only Federal interests: curtailing efforts against low-level, ordinary crime where
concurrent State and Federal criminal jurisdiction exists. The Department would aggressively triage these cases,
pursuing only those having truly Federal implications. For example, in 1992, of the 4,500 criminal fraud cases
the U.S. Attorneys declined, they declined over 1,200 of them (26%) because of minimal Federal interest. Almost
one-third of all Federal criminal cases involve controlled substances. But of the 3,900 drug possession or dealing
cases declined, they declined only 178 (less than one-half of one percent) for this reason. Likewise, the U.S.
Attorneys declined 12,000 of the cases referred to them by sources other than the Justice Department or the Secret
Service. Of these, only 910 (7% and the most from any reported source) were declined for lack of a Federal
stake. The Department's standards for a significant Federal interest may be so well understood by even those
outside of the Federal law enforcement community that they rarely refer a case not meeting the standards.
Alternatively, standards may be so low that Federal prosecutors are pursuing many cases that should proceed in
State and local justice systems. An aggressive triage would reduce the number of Federal prisoners and result in
processing a consistently higher level offender in the Federal criminal justice system.
Considering prison capacity: reducing the need for prison hiring by linking prosecution policy to incarceration
policy. The Department would adjust prosecution thresholds--which are not public--periodically to accommodate
projected prison space
Using attorneys in other agencies: aggressively delegating civil litigation--subject to Department control--to
attorneys based in other agencies, and recasting the role of the Department's civil attorneys to controlling civil
litigation and providing oversight and possibly training. Client agencies would internalize more of the cost of
litigation and make efficient tradeoffs between litigation and other activities which accomplish their mission. This
measure either could save or shift from the Department up to 1,000 FTE by 1999
Privatizing bankruptcy functions: privatizing the functions of the U.S. bankruptcy trustees, saving 1,000
FTE. OMB staff proposed this measure during the 1995 budget process. The Department is just initiating a study
which would produce results sometime next year. Option 2 assumes privatization in 1997, saving 1,000
workyears.
III-48
ANALYSIS: Federal prison staffing is the primary--but not the sole--engine driving Departmental FTE dramatically upward.
Immigration initiatives and the recent crime bill will make meeting staffing targets even more difficult to reach. The Department
has been very reluctant to commit to any measures to control growth. The Congress rejected staffing reductions the
Administration proposed for 1995 and funded a net 1,640 FTE above the President's request. In particular, the Congress
increased staffing above the 1995 President's request for the following bureaus partially offset by reductions in others: FBI
(+1,470 FTE), DEA (+284 FTE), U.S. Attorneys (+161 FTE). See law enforcement issue paper. These increases are
explicitly provided in the Commerce, Justice and State appropriations conference report narrative.
Any effort to reduce the Federal crime control bureaucracy may make the Administration vulnerable to charges of being "soft on
crime." However, policy responses which only increase the efficiency of current operations are highly unlikely to stem
dramatic, long term FTE growth.
III-49
Justice Department Historic Workyears
(Includes Workyears Associated with the Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund)
120
1996 Options
1996 Workyear Ceiling (103,800)
100
Workyears in Thousands
80
1019
60
DEA
40
INS
20
US Attys
A Other
o
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996 Req.
1996 Rec.
1989
1991
1993
1995
1996 DOJ Strm
Fiscal Year
Note: 1995 includes 1,640 unrequested workyears that Congress funded.
III-50
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DOJ's progress in financial management is good. Out of six required 1992 audited financial statements,
covering 13 percent of DOJ's total budget authority, four received unqualified audit opinions. Authority was
provided to the working capital fund (WCF) to retain certain amounts to be used as a reliable funding source
for essential financial management needs. The Department revised its strategy and will migrate bureaus one at
a time to the Department's FMIS rather than phase (parallel) the implementation of modules. However,
corrective action for older, pending management control problems should be accelerated. Accountable focal
points are needed to coordinate the correction of high risk areas that cross organizational lines (specifically
financial litigation enforcement).
III-51
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
High Risk Area
Progress to Date and Next Steps
Assessment
Departmental debt collection
In 1993, future funding issues were resolved by passage of law allowing Justice to retain
2
information systems are inadequate to
and use up to 3% of amounts collected pursuant to civil debt collection litigation
support management of litigation and
activities to pay the costs of processing and tracking such litigation. In November 1993,
collection activity on an estimated
Justice awarded a contract for development and implementation of departmental financial
$15.1E inventory. In 1994, Justice
litigation and collection management information system. The implementation of the
collected over $1 billion.
system in the U.S. Attorney's office is off schedule.
More than $15.1B (1993 estimate) in
Next steps: (1) Revise schedule and begin nationwide implementation of the system;
pending civil claims receivables are in
implement in U.S. Attorney's office in 1995. (2) Activate interagency advisory group
Justice's inventory, including
on the central intake facility reporting.
approximately $14.1B in receivables
outstanding that were referred to
Justice by other agencies for litigation
and/or collection action. At risk: non-
collection of up to 5% of total
(representing potential additional
collections from improved management
information).
¹Assessment Codes: 1 - Significant progress. 2 - Active efforts underway to improve progress. 3 - Reservations about adequacy of progress
and/or plan; A - Added to the High Risk List. D1 - Deleted: has been corrected. D2 - Deleted: no longer sufficiently serious to warrant the "high
risk" designation and receiving appropriate attention at the agency. D3 - Deleted: does not belong on a list of agency operational problems.
III-52
Departmental asset forfeiture
Asset Forfeiture continues to be an important law enforcement tool in combating crime,
2
information systems are inadequate to
particularly drug trafficking and drug-related money laundering. Through a cooperative
ensure program integrity or achieve full
venture with the Treasury Department, the Consolidated Asset Tracking System (CATS)
revenue-generating potential of the
has been built to operate at a Justice data center using the Treasury telecommunications
Asset Forfeiture program.
network. Under this partnership, CATS will not only serve the agencies in the Justice
Asset Forfeiture program but also serve the asset tracking needs of three Treasury law
Seized Asset Forfeiture inventory
enforcement agencies. As of September 30, 1994, CATS was fully operational on a
valued at $1.9B at end of 1993.
pilot basis in four western states. Full activation of CATS is essential to improve
operational efficiency, provide stronger internal controls over the handling of seized
At risk: $25-$30M annually in
assets and sales of proceeds, provide enhanced analysis in support of asset seizure and
increased revenue and cost savings.
disposal decisions, and provide complete and credible reporting on program activity.
Next steps: After a review of operational performance, CATS will be implemented
nationwide throughout 1995. A formal post-implementation evaluation will be
conducted in 1996. Also in 1995, steps will be taken to reach a feasibility decision
regarding use of CATS to meet the asset tracking needs of the Customs Service. Work
will also commence on development of a module in CATS to support Asset Forfeiture
case tracking in U.S. Attorneys' Offices. Once CATS is fully implemented, a program
of recurring analysis can be established to identify operational weaknesses, to project
probable outcomes of various decision options, and to support new, outcome-based
program performance measures.
Executive Office of U.S. Trustees
Progress was made in 1994 to rid the court dockets of backlogged bankruptcy cases and
2
(EOUST): Need to increase oversight
to uncover wrong doing by private trustees, their employees, and debtors. A substantial
to prevent fraud, misappropriation, and
number of criminal referrals was made in 1994. Enforcement priorities were
breach of fiduciary standards by private
established. Attention was given to reallocation of cases, particularly those in which
trustees.
there was little creditor activity, and reallocation of positions to offices with highest
caseloads is planned. Detailed analyses of field operations were conducted. Resources
Estimated amounts in bankruptcy
are being targeted to areas requiring attention, e.g. audit and audit resolution, closure of
accounts is $29B. No risk to Federal
old cases, criminal enforcement and greater oversight of private trustees.
funds but private funds are subject to
potential loss or fraud.
Next steps: (i) Redesign case management systems pilot by September 1995. (ii)
Design more complete bankruptcy fraud task force process. (iii) Increase the returns to
unsecured creditors and debtors by reducing professional fees and Trustee administrative
expenses. (iv) Establish a publications program to educate debtors and creditors about
their rights in the bankruptcy system. (v) Complete a study on alternative models for
increasing program delivery.
III-53
Bureau of Prisons (BOP) overcrowding
BOP has already reduced prison overcrowding, ensuring safe and secure conditions for
D
affects safety and security.
community, staff and inmates through new construction and modernization of prisons.
The inmate population in the Federal Prison System was 33% over rated capacity as of
1994 budget provides $2.2B for BOP.
September 30, 1994. Since 1989, the capacity of BOP has increased by over 33,000
At risk: the safety and security of
beds and overcrowding has dropped from 70%. BOP plans to add over 39,000 beds by
prison staff, inmates and surrounding
1999. The plan will be monitored because inmate population may increase faster than
communities.
capacity due to increased levels of criminal litigation in the judicial system.
Funding for new construction in 1995 will increase capacity by 6,984 beds. The BOP
plan projects achieving design capacity of 107,429 beds by the end of 1999.
Next steps: Resolution of this high risk area is predicated on availability and use of the
funds provided in previous budgets. All funds are committed for construction projects,
but are not technically "obligated" until a procurement award is made. These have been
delayed by community opposition and/or environmental impact studies in some cases.
Department: Inadequate security over
Within INS, FY 94 was a year of intensive program establishment. INS established a
2
department ADP sites and systems.
Computer System Security Office that developed its operating structure. Computer
system security officers were designated for major sites and training was conducted,
At risk: effectiveness of litigation
using two new reference books. Training was conducted at headquarters and Laguna
action and law enforcement programs
Niguel, CA on risk analysis, contingency planning, risk management, and LAN
as a result of loss or unauthorized
Security. Briefings were presented to senior executive staff and end users, among
access to sensitive information, as well
others, and an Awareness and Training Toolkit was distributed to the security officers
as control of financial assets.
for their use. Risk Analyses were completed for four mainframe operating systems.
Analyses are in process for eight other mainframe operating systems.
Next steps: FY 95 and FY 96 will be years of program development and
implementation. Audit strategies will be developed for mainframe and distributed
environments. To increase field assistance, customer service representatives will be
appointed and more awareness training held, including a conference for security
officers. A virus prevention strategy will be developed. The risk analysis goals will be
to complete all mainframe applications and then address the distributed environment,
including international offices. Guidelines on infrastructure security and how to
integrate computer security into normal business practices will be distributed.
III-54
Immigration and Naturalization Service
In 1994, the new Commissioner conducted an in depth organizational review to further
2
(INS): Poor management controls and
streamline the staff and functions and to improve the management controls. Final
inadequate financial system.
recommendations will be issued in the nearest future.
Accounting system processes $1.5B
Substantial progress has been made in the Financial Management area. INS has
annually. At risk: assurance that funds
continued to correct weaknesses in the fee account which generated a disclaimer in an
are accounted for in an accurate and
audit of 1993 financial statements. INS reevaluated the fees it charges for providing
timely fashion.
various services and concluded that fee increases are warranted and it therefore, has
implemented the recommended fee increases in July 1994 following a public rule
making. INS has made regulatory changes that mandated the major air and sea
passenger carriers to report the user fees collected on a monthly basis to better assist
INS in forecasting revenues due.
INS has implemented the Debt Collection System (DCOS) in 1994 and recently in
concert with Agriculture, Plant, Health Inspection service has entered into an agreement
to jointly audit the air carriers and steamships for substantiation of user fee collection.
As a result of a recent decision by DOJ to let INS seek its own core accounting system,
a reimbursement agreement has been signed with the Financial Management Service of
the Department of the Treasury to initiate a preliminary review of systems requirements.
Next steps: (i) Further enhancements to DCOS (ii) Implement Bonds Management
System (iii) Implement new accounting system.
$2.1M for the above initiatives.
III-55
U.S. Marshals Service (USMS):
USMS keeps to its decision to migrate to the Department's Financial Management
2
inadequate financial management
Information System (FMIS). In the past, USMS implemented a distributed budgeting
system; non-conformance in fund
module at headquarters and developed modifications to FMIS' general ledger and other
control and asset value reporting.
modules to meet USMS specific needs. During 1993 and 1994, district business
practice reviews focusing on control matters were completed in a sample of districts,
Accounting system processes $1B
and a new separation of duties policy was issued. Other district business practices
annually. As risk: assurance that funds
reviews were performed, including some on fact witness program to develop new
are accounted for in an accurate and
procedures.
timely fashion.
Next steps: During 1995, complete requirements analysis, design and development,
testing and recording, training and documentation, data conversion, and implementation
of USMS field FMIS migration.
USMS, INS and BOP: Shortage of
In 1994, additional beds were provided for INS and USMS in a 300-bed contract facility
2
detention facilities.
in Elizabeth, NJ and a 1,000 bed contract facility in Eloy, AZ. The USMS Cooperative
Agreement Program funded 9,000 beds in 129 Federal court cities.
1994 budget provides $87M for
detention facilities. As risk: ability to
Next steps: USMS will continue to provide approximately 9,000 slots per year. BOP
meet demands of increasing prisoner
and INS will complete construction and expansion of a 300-bed facility in San
population.
Francisco, CA and a 250-bed facility in Buffalo, NY by 97-98, El Paso, TX and
Krome, FL facilities by a total of 500 beds in 96-97, and Florence, AZ for 155 beds
and El Centro, CA for 200 beds during 1995.
III-56
INS and U.S. Customs Service: the
The INS and Customs Service have undertaken a cooperative and coordinated effort to
2
dual management structure providing
develop initiatives addressing the GAO concerns of ineffective border management. The
land border inspections and clearance is
initiatives include: coordinated shift scheduling and special operations, cross training,
inadequate.
joint performance standards and the development of port quality improvement
committees. The Headquarters offices of both agencies have proposed to test these
$150M to $180M spent annually by
concepts at six ports of entry; Calexico, CA; Brownsville, TX; El Paso, TX; Eagle
INS and Customs on land border
Pass, TX; Nogales, AZ; and Port Huron, MI. These five initiatives are described
inspection. At risk: impact on U.S.
further below.
economic and social welfare resulting
from illegal entry of people and drugs
To ensure that inspectors are evaluated on their cross-designated functions, the INS and
and other contraband.
USCS have developed a critical "cross-designated" element to be incorporated into
performance appraisals. INS and USCS have developed a unified program of
continuing training and education for cross-designated inspectors that enhances
enforcement, facilitation, strengthens skills and increases knowledge.
Next steps: In FY 95, 12 Federal law enforcement training center courses are proposed
as combined training for INS and USCS. The three areas of training are: national
refresher, national update, and local. The formal quality improvement committees to be
established at ports of entry will be responsible for initiating, monitoring, and steering
cooperative initiatives at the ports, with various tiers of management and the bargaining
unit also involved. These committees have been established at the six test sites. The
port directors and labor representatives were trained in TQM awareness,
implementation, and problem-solving. After investigation of factors which facilitate and
hinder coordinated shift scheduling, the INS/USCS working group developed guidelines
for implementing it at 6 test sites in FY 95. Both agencies conduct special operations,
using specialized teams, to accomplish their respective missions. INS and USCS have
selected sites to test a coordinated approach and have surveyed field managers to
identify existing procedures or special factors that may adversely impact cooperative
special operations. Policy and procedures have been developed and tests have been
conducted at two ports.
III-57
INS and Justice components: asylum
INS had over 400,000 backlogged asylum applications at the end of FY 94 and in FY
2
system is unable to process asylum
95, INS may receive an additional 10,000 applications per month. With the resource
claims in a timely manner.
enhancements received, the asylum corps will more than double from 150 to 334
officers. The number of Immigration judges will increase by approximately 80%, from
1994 budget provides $43.6M for
84 to 150. Once the reforms are fully in effect, the Asylum Corps will process a
Justice asylum processing. At risk:
projected 100,000 to 150,000 asylum applications. The Strategy includes a priority
increasing vulnerability of asylum
system to guide decisions about which individuals to detain. Publicity programs will be
system to abuse by ineligible asylum
developed to communicate the adverse consequences of illegal entry. A plan will be
applicants.
developed to offer and operate voluntary returns to the home country. A minimum
number of cases at selected sites will be prosecuted and publicized. Involvement in
interagency and intercountry coordination will be expanded. Use of video
teleconferencing in expulsion and deportation hearings will be increased.
The Department of Justice published a proposed rule on Asylum Reform on March 30,
1994. The INS and the Executive Office for Immigration Review have reviewed the
comments submitted and have discussed revisions to the rule. Final changes are
expected to be published by November 1994. Coupled with resource increases, the
Asylum system is expected to be fully operational by the end of 1995.
Next steps: The Asylum Office plans to upgrade computers and to install LANs to
access information. This concept will be expanded to link district offices, EOIR offices,
and asylum offices. With increased funding in FY 95, the asylum officer corps will be
doubled. Customer service will be improved by the restoration of travel funds for
"circuit rider" asylum officers to travel to interview applicants rather than requiring the
applicants to travel to the asylum office for the interview. The Service Centers will
increase the use of the automated system to identify persons in the deportation
proceedings process to ensure that these persons are not also applying for asylum
benefits. The speed and efficiency of the asylum application processing in Service
Centers will be improved. The 1996 Budget includes a program increase of $10M to
increase INS' ability to deport up to 20,000 aliens denied asylum.
III-58
SUMMARY OF PAD LEVEL DECISIONS NOT COVERED IN ISSUE PAPERS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
President's
Recom.
Discretionary:
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
less
Actual
Actual
(FY 95Bud)
Enacted
(FY 95Bud)
Request
Recom.
Request
Federal Prison System & Detention
Prisons Salaries and Expenses
BA
1743
1950
2407
2352
2839
2887
2664
-224
OL
1702
1878
2267
2220
2764
2706
2516
-190
See issue paper #1.
Prisons Construction
BA
194
270
191
276
141
401
326
-75
OL
449
604
589
598
613
527
520
-8
See issue paper #1.
Support of U.S. Prisoners
BA
268
313
370
297
370
367
297
-71
OL
267
230
337
293
360
356
314
-42
Program provides for incarcerating Federal prisoners in State and local prisons.
Request includes a 5% increase in the number of jail days rented from State and local governments, along with an 8% increase in the daily
rate cost.
Recommendation freezes funding at the 1995 enacted level due to past inaccurate (too high) projections of prison population. It allows
unforeseen increases to be financed by unobligated balances currently estimated at $50M, or through reprogramming from other programs.
Justice Assistance
BA
408
408
125
500
125
550
310
-240
Byrne Grants
OL
375
390
280
360
240
355
300
-55
See issue paper #2.
All Other Office of
BA
409
272
240
265
240
1639
1564
-75
Justice Programs
OL
275
456
300
209
215
956
933
-23
III-59
SUMMARY OF PAD LEVEL DECISIONS NOT COVERED IN ISSUE PAPERS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
President's
Recom.
Discretionary:
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
less
Actual
Actual
(FY 95Bud)
Enacted
(FY 95Bud)
Request
Recom.
Request
Request supports $42M increase for juvenile justice programs similar to that proposed in last year's budget. Proposes small increases for
crime statistics +$3.8M (Bureau of Justice Statistics) and crime studies +$1.7M (National Institute of Justice) over 1995 levels.
Recommendation level funds all bureaus within OJP at 1995 levels given extensive resources provided for like programs in Crime Bill.
Law Enforcement and Criminal Investigations
Federal Bureau of Investigation
BA
2019
2062
2159
2204
2085
2588
2316
-271
OL
1975
2008
2012
1985
2096
2324
2121
-204
See issue paper #3.
Drug Enforcement Administration. BA
742
737
724
757
772
876
792
-84
OL
783
621
665
690
785
786
722
-63
Request includes +$119 and 180 FTE over 1995 enacted level. Includes $53M and 152 FTE to annualize 1995 enhancements in 1996, $8M and 28
FTE request for an anti-heroin initiative, $45M to upgrade automation, and $5M for various other small initiatives, such as $8M for contract linguistic
support (to support wiretaps).
Recommendation includes $35M and 27 FTE over 1995 enacted. Includes $53M and 152 FTE to annualize 1995 enhancements in 1996, $5M and 15
FTE for heroin initiative (from VCRTF), $8M to upgrade automation, $4M for various other small programs, and imposes -$34M and -140 FTE of
streamlining savings.
Organized Crime Drug
BA
385
382
370
375
350
389
375
-14
Enforcement Task Forces
OL
463
376
403
406
355
413
402
-11
Program provides reimbursement to Federal law enforcement agencies for their coordination in drug investigations (primarily includes DOJ and
Treasury). Request includes only adjustments to base to account for inflation (+$14M).
Recommendation level funds program at 1995 levels. As Congress accepted proposed reductions in 1995, this proposal should not be
controversial.
III-60
SUMMARY OF PAD LEVEL DECISIONS NOT COVERED IN ISSUE PAPERS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
President's
Recom.
Discretionary:
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
less
Actual
Actual
(FY 95Bud)
Enacted
(FY 95Bud)
Request
Recom.
Request
U.S. Marshals
BA
338
341
366
397
366
469
460
-9
OL
314
368
370
398
366
470
462
-8
Request includes program increases of $54M and 120 FTE. Major increases include security for new and renovated Federal courthouses
(+$29M and 119 FTE); security for high threat trials (+$3M); information systems, operational equipment and ADP (+$15M and one FTE); and
permanent changes of station (+$3M): and other misc. administration ($4M).
Recommendation is the same as the request with minor downward adjustments to squeeze out overestimates for inflation costs. Marshals'
workload for the Judiciary has been rapidly expanding.
Immigration
Immigration and Naturalization
BA
978
1051
1499
1407
1450
1547
1453
-94
OL
1016
1073
1330
1243
1324
1407
1332
-75
See issue paper #4.
Major Litigating Divisions
U.S. Attorneys
BA
797
818
830
844
830
938
884
-54
OL
728
823
815
827
830
916
867
-49
Request includes program increases of +$54M and 245 FTE. Major increases include a national anti-violence and gang plan (+$2M and 38 FTE and
+$5M from the VCRTF); monitoring the 1997 International Brotherhood of Teamsters election of officers; prosecuting health care fraud (+$6M and 33
FTE); and affirmative civil litigation (+$22M and 134 FTE).
Recommendation includes +$22M (40 FTE) for inflationary adjustments. Program increases are for supervision of the election of Teamsters ($6M)
and implementing a nation-wide anti-violence and gang plan (+$5M and 30 FTE from the VCRTF). Recommendation would convert $10M of Salaries
and Expenses money to grants for States and localities to hire violent crime prosecutors (corresponding staffing reduction of - -160 FTE). Would
eliminate 80 Federal prosecutors and add more than 80 State and local prosecutors (who cost less).
General Legal Activities
BA
496
519
540
520
433
514
437
-77
OL
503
509
530
513
433
504
436
-68
III-61
SUMMARY OF PAD LEVEL DECISIONS NOT COVERED IN ISSUE PAPERS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993 FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
President's
Recom.
Discretionary:
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
less
Actual
Actual
(FY 95Bud)
Enacted
(FY 95Bud)
Request
Recom.
Request
Total, Discretionary
BA
9391
9397
12513
12176
12713
15555
14170
-1385
OL
9325
9721
10890
10556
11295
13370
12505
-865
Discretionary Planning
Guidance
BA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
13573
...
---
---
OL
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
12535
...
---
---
Note: In accordance with OFPP initiatives in procurement reform, DOJ totals include an undistributed savings allowance of $16M in BA
and $8M in OL.
III-62
SUMMARY OF SMALL AGENCY DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION, STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE
(in millions of dollars)
FY 1993
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
President's
Recom.
Request
Request
Agency
PAD
less
Actual
Actual
(FY 95Bud)
Enacted
(FY 95Bud)
Request
Recom.
Request
Discretionary:
Federal Trade Commission
BA
66.1
65.9
62.7
61.1
62.7
79.1
60.1
(19.0)
OL
64.4
64.0
62.5
60.5
62.7
77.7
60.2
(17.4)
Agency request includes a program increase of + $10M and + -86 FTE to enforce disclosure requirements under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA). The FTC would withdraw this request if the Administration continues to support
appropriations language prohibiting the FTC from enforcing FDICIA. The FTC also requests + $2M for new and enhanced automated
information systems.
Recommendation includes requested inflationary adjustments and an increased estimate of pre-merger filing fees 1+ 8M), which decrease
the FTC's budget authority. Program increases include + $2M for new and enhanced automated information systems.
Legal Services Corporation
BA
357.0
415.2
500.0
415.0
500.0
525.0
440.0
(85.0)
OL
388.9
405.1
482.6
412.4
500.0
505.9
435.7
(70.2)
Agency request includes program increases of + $110M for increasing services to clients, especially basic field programs 1+ $80M).
Recommendation includes program increases of + $25M. Senator Hollings has concerns about the fundamental role of the LSC.
State Justice Institute
BA
13.5
6.8
1.3
13.6
...
15.0
1.2
(13.8)
OL
13.6
13.4
10.6
13.5
15.7
13.9
10.2
(3.7)
The SJI is a non-profit corporation, established by Congress in 1987, to award grants to improve the administration of justice in State courts.
It is governed by a Board of Directors appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. SJI has strong backing from Congressman
Neil Smith and numerous State and local judiciaries.
The recommended level of $1.2 million proposes to phase out SJI in 1996. Our crime bill recommendations (VCRTF) include $30.7M in
funding for judiciary assistance, largely duplicating the role of SJI.
III-63
STREAMLINING PLANS: NPR TARGET POPULATIONS
DEPARMENT OF JUSTICE
FY 1993
Actual
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
FY 1997
FY 1998
FY1999
Total FTES
94,650
97,230
103,511
107,385
108,918
107,359
103,514
Number of positions:
Supervisors
14,528
14,148
14,211
14,012
13,309
12,109
10,956
Supervisory Ratio
1:5.78
1:5.90
1:6.28
1:6.66
1:7.18
1:7.87
1:8.45
Headquarters Staff
20,194
19,518
19,012
18,416
17,728
16,953
16,022
Personnel Specialists
1,854
1,812
1,783
1,820
1,728
1,606
1,464
Budget Specialists
448
457
448
447
431
412
388
Acquisition Specialists
708
739
733
772
746
695
634
Accountants & Auditors
1,596
1,658
1,649
1,698
1,616
1,512
1,394
Organizational Layers*
*Note: No numbers were provided for this exercise.
III-64
FEDERAL DRUG CONTROL FUNDING
Agency Summary
($ Millions)
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
ONDCP
Tentative
Req. Change
Budget
Agency
Priority
RMO Staff
1995 1996
Description of Major Funding Issues
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Mark
$
%
Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Service
6
6
6
6
-0.5
-7.6%
U.S. Forest Service
10
10
10
9
-0.4
-4.2%
Women, Infants, Children (WIC)
15
15
14
14
14
0.0
0.0%
Total, Agriculture
31
31
30
29
14
-0.9
-3.0%
Corp. For Nat'l & Com'ty Service
29
43
39
39
0.0
0.0%
Department of Defense
868
874
854
838
-16.1
-1.9%
o Based Upon Preliminary Estimates Subject To Change
Department of Education
599.0
781.0
603
732
732
603
129.0
21.4%
o DofEd: Adds (+ $68M) For Safe and Drug Free Schools; Adde ($27M) For Net'l Programs
VCRTF Funding:
Adds (+ $35M) For Several Smaller Programs Education Programs
Family & Community Endeavor Schools Grants
---
0.6
1.6
2
1.6
1.0
179.7%
ONDCP: High Priorty To Fully Fund DofEd Request
o RMO: Tentative Staff Mark Equale Sec. Riley's If Request Must Stay
Department of Education
599
781
604
734
734
678
130.8
21.7%
Planning Guidance
Rivlin: Dr they work? why are we doing this?
Dept. of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families
90
90
89
90
90
1.0
1.1%
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
1,143
1,420
1,144
1,380
1,420
1,298
236.2
20.7%
o HHS: Adde (+$257M) To Block Grant To Treat Hardcore Addicts
Administration (SAMSHA)
ONDCP: #1 Priority Adde $260M) To Fully Fund HHS Treatment Request
RMO: Funds Hard-Core Treatment Increase @$200M Vs. Request 1+ $260M)
o HHS: Cuts (-$11M) From Community Prevention Programs
HHS: Cuts (-$12M) From Pregnant Women & Infants Prevention Programs
ONDCP: Adds (+$40M) For Targetted Prevention Programs @ 6AMSHA
RMO: Reduces Request To FY95 Levels For Prevention (-$27M)
National Institutes of Health
425
444
438
452
452
14.7
3.4%
o HHS: Adds (+$16M) For Increased Prevention and Treatment Research
Social Security Administration
20
23
119
119
119
0.0
0.0%
o HHS: Adds (+29M) For Drug Monitoring & Referral of SSI Recipients
Centers for Disease Control
37
37
44
49
49
5.1
11.6%
0 HHS: Adds (+$5M) For AIDS Prevention
Food and Drug Administration
7
7
7
7
7
0.4
5.7%
Health Care Financing Administration
262
292
292
330
330
37.8
12.9%
0 HHS: Adds +$38M) To Address Increase MEDICAID Drug Related Costs
Indian Health Service
43
51
45
51
51
6.4
14.2%
) HHS: Increase (+ $6.4M) Long-Term Treatment of Hard-Core
Health Resources & Services Administration
33
39
36
38
38
2.0
5.6%
Users Among Native Americans
Co-Morbid Alcohol & Drug Treatment
218.0
183.0
229.0
228.0
228
232.0
VCRTF Funding:
Family & Community Endeavor Schools Grants
-
1.3
3.6
3.6
2.3
179.5%
0 Scored 5% Drug Related
Total, HHS
2,278
2,585
2,445
2,750
2,434
305.0
12.5%
$500m on treat users
FEDERAL DRUG CONTROL FUNDING
Agency Summary
($ Millions)
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
ONDCP
Tentative
Req. Change
Budget
Agency
Priority
RMO Staff
1995 1996
Description of Major Funding Issues
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Mark
$
%
Dept. of Housing and Urban Dev.
315
315
290
300
300
10.0
3.4%
o HUD: Increase (+ $10M) For Drug Elimination Grants
Department of the Interior
Bureau of Indian Affairs
22
18
19
20
0.5
2.5%
Bureau of Land Management
5
5
5
5
-0.0
-0.2%
Fish & Wildlife Service
1
1
1
1
0.1
15.8%
National Park Service
9
9
9
9
0.0
0.0%
Office of Territorial and International Affairs
1
1
1
0
-0.8
-80.0%
Total, Interior
39
34
35
35
0
-0.2
-0.6%
The Judiciary
453
505
473
541
541
68.0
14.4%
o Reflects Projected Growth In Judiciary Case Load
Department of Justice
Assets Forfeiture Fund
576
487
477
477
477
0.0
0.0%
U.S. Attorneys
208
209
213
226
213
12.7
6.0%
Bureau of Prisons
1,408
1,670
1,694
2,142
1,922
448.2
26.5%
0 DOJ: Reflects Increase (+$448M) To Activate 12 New Prisons
Includes (+$5) For 600 Drug Treatment Beds With 3 New Facilities Started
RMO: Reduces Prison Activations To 6 New Prisons
Criminal Division
19
19
19
22
20
2.3
11.8%
Drug Enforcement Administration
768
767
800
909
914
825
109.4
13.7%
o DOJ: Adde It $33M) For Office Automation
ONDCP: Fund Agency Request; Adds $5M) For Expanded Marijuana Eradication
RMO: Cute [-$30M] From Office Automation; Implements Streamlining [-$50M]
Federal Bureau of Investigation
257
262
492
602
525
110.2
22.4%
o DOJ: Increase (+$122M) For Adv. Telephony, Field Sup., Tactical Ops
RMO: Reduces [-$77M] Adv. Telephony To $45M
Immigration and Naturalization Service
157
168
185
178
170
-6.3
-3.4%
Interpol
2
2
2
2
2
0.5
29.4%
Riulin:
what
Byone is spent doing effectively?
to
U.S. Marshals Service
235
256
281
327
309
46.2
16.5%
o DOJ: Adds (+ 25M) To Support New Court Houses
Office of Justice Programs
520
136
111
273
273
112
161.1
144.6%
o DOJ: Reflects Increased Byme Grants Direct Appropriations( + $117M)
ONDCP: Supports DOJ Request For Level Funding For Byrne Grants
RMO: Cute [-$160M] In Grants: Byrne Funded Solely From VCRTF
Organized Crime Drug Enforcement
382
370
370
389
375
19.3
5.2%
DOJ: Adds (+$19M) For Increased Costs Of Operations
RMO: Reduces Request (-$14M)
Support of U.S. Prisoners
222
263
229
257
229
27.8
12.1%
o DOJ: Adds (+$10M) To Support Violent Crime Initiative
Tax Division
1
1
1
1
1
0.1
16.1%
Weed and Seed Program Fund
7
7
7
7
0
0.0
0.3%
FEDERAL DRUG CONTROL FUNDING
Agency Summary
($ Millions)
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1996
FY 1996
President's
ONDCP
Tentative
Req. Change
Budget
Agency
Priority
RMO Staff
1995 1996
Description of Major Funding Issues
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Mark
$
%
VCRTF Funding:
Community Policing (100,000 Cops)
567
429
628
628
199.0
46.4%
0 Scored 33% Drug Related - Law Enforcement & Prevention
Prisons Grants
---
111
107
111.0
o Scored 20% Drug Related Law Enforcement
Drug Treatment For State & Federal Prisoners
---
27
41
26.5
o Scored 100% Drug Related Treatment
Local Crime Prevention Block Grant
---
7
6
7.3
o Scored 20% Drug Related . Prevention
Model Intensive Grant Program
---
2
2
2.4
o Scored 5% Drug Related - Prevention
Drug Courts
29
107
200
77.6
267.4%
0 Scored 100% Drug Related . Treatment
Improving Border Controls
15
24
35
9.0
60.5%
o Scored 5% Drug Related - Law Enforcement
Rural Drug Trafficking
-
12
17
11.5
o Scored 100% Drug Related - Law Enforcement
Byrne Grants
450
260
260
-190.0
-42.2%
o Scored 100% Drug Related - Law Enforcement
Additional DEA Agents
---
12
12
12.0
0 Scored 100% Drug Related - Law Enforcement
Other VCRTF Funding
---
23
14
22.5
Total, Justice
4,762
5,184
5,803
7,024
6,502
1220.4
21.0%
Department of Labor
65
80
77
97
19.8
25.6%
Off. of National Drug Control Policy
Operations
12
10
10
29
29
19.4
195.6%
c ONDCP: Adde (+ $15M) For Hard Core User Study: Provides (+ $4.5M, 21FTE)
For Additional Staff To Perform Newly Mandated Authorities
High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas
86
98
107
146
146
39.0
36.4%
o ONDCP: Adde (+ $39M) To Support New Baltimore/Washington and Puerto Rico/VI HIDTA
Special Forfeiture Fund
13
53
42
86
86
44.1
105.3%
0 ONDCP: Adde (+ $44M) For Unspecified Initiatives
Total ONDCP
111
161
159
261
261
0
102.5
64.6%
Small Business Administration
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
50.0%
Agency for International Development
45
0
---
---
---
o FY 1995 Funding Estimate "Soft" And May Be Overstated By $5M
Department of State
International Narcotic Matters (INM), Politico/Military Affairs, & Diplomatic/
Bureau of International Narcotics Matters
0
-
-
---
-
-
Consular Service Bureaus Merged Into An International Narcotics Control
Bureau of Politico/Military Affairs
0
---
-
Program (INCP)
International Narcotics Control Program
115
232
154
213
213
TBD
59.2
38.5%
0 State: Adds (+ $59M) To Restore Funding Country Programs
Emer. in the Dip. and Consular Service
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
RMO: PAD Has Not Yet Reviewed
Total, State
116
232
154
213
213
59.2
38.5%
FEDERAL DRUG CONTROL FUNDING
Agency Summary
($ Millions)
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
ONDCP
Tentative
Req. Change
Budget
Agency
Priority
RMO Staff
1995 1996
Description of Major Funding Issues
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Mark
$
%
Department of Transportation
U.S. Coast Guard
315
263
259
251
-8.1
-3.1%
0 DOT: Reflects Reduction (-$8M) In CG Anti-Drug Operations As The
Federal Aviation Administration
25
17
17
20
4.0
24.1%
Result of Diversion of Effort To Haitian Refugee Problem
National Highway Traffic Safety Admin.
34
28
29
28
-1.7
-5.8%
Total, Transportation
374
307
305
299
0
-5.8
-1.9%
Department of the Treasury
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
154
154
157
162
5.6
3.6%
U.S. Customs Service
536
506
513
514
1.1
0.2%
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
20
18
22
20
-1.5
-7.0%
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
15
16
18
11
-6.6
-37.0%
Internal Revenue Service
90
95
91
100
9.0
9.8%
U.S. Secret Service
57
57
58
65
7.6
13.0%
Treasury Forfeiture Fund
230
209
209
209
0.0
0.0%
Total, Treasury
1,103
1,054
1,067
1,082
15.1
1.4%
U.S. Information Agency
8
10
8
8
0.4
5.2%
o Funds Public Diplomacy Activities Relating To Counter-Narcotics
Efforts Overseas
Department of Veterans Affairs
940
981
887
940
52.5
5.9%
o VA: Adds (+ $42.5) To Reflect Cost of Medical Care Inflation
Adds ($10M & 107FTE) For Substance Abuse Prevention Services
Total Federal Program
12,134
13,178
13,231
15,192
1960.9
14.8%
FEDERAL DRUG CONTROL FUNDING
Agency Summary
($ Millions)
FY 1994
FY 1995
FY 1995
FY 1996
President's
ONDCP
Tentative
Req. Change
Budget
Agency
Priority
RMO Staff
1995 1996
Description of Major Funding Issues
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Mark
$
%
Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund Summary [Non Add]
PREVENTION & TREATMENT
Model Intensive Prevention Grants
-
2.0
2.0
2.0
FACES Grants
---
1.9
5.2
5.2
3.3
180.9%
Local Crime Prevention Block Grant
---
---
7.5
6.0
7.5
Federal & State Prison Drug Treatment
---
---
27.0
41.0
27.0
Drug Courts
29.0
107.0
200.0
78.0
269.0%
Other Prevention
-
9.0
7.2
STATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Community Policing Grants
429.0
429.0
628.0
628.0
199.0
46.4%
Bryne Grant Program
450.0
260.0
260.0
-190.0
-42.2%
Prison Grants
---
38.7
111.0
107.0
72.3
186.8%
Rural Law Enforcement
---
---
12.0
17.0
12.0
Other S&L Law Enforcement
-
---
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Treasury Authorizations
---
17.5
17.5
17.5
Justice Authorizations
-
7.0
7.0
7.0
DEA Agents
---
---
12.0
12.0
12.0
Improving Border Controls
---
9.0
24.0
35.0
15.0
166.7%
Other Federal Law Enforcement
-
86.0
---
-
TOTAL CRIME CONTROL ACT
0.0
515.0
966.6
1,227
1,338
260.8
27.0%
TOTAL DRUG CONTROL [Incl. Crime Control]
12,134
13,178
13,231
15,192
1,961
14.8%
Total Supply Programs
7,683
7,742
8,340
9,592
1,252
15.0%
o REQ LEVEL: Increases Supply Programs By An Estimated +$1.3B
63.3%
58.7%
63.0%
63.1%
Total Demand Programs
4,451
5,419
4,891
5,599
709
14.5%
o REQ LEVEL: Increases Demand Programs By An Estimated + $704M
36.7%
41.1%
37.0%
36.9%
FBI Staffing and FTE
26500
LEGEND
26000
- On-Board Staff
25500
- FTE Levels
DOJ Req.
25000
PAD Rec.
24500
24000
23500
23000
22500
Sept. 1993
FY94 FTE
Sept. 1994
FY95 FTE
Sept. 1995
FY96 FTE
Sept. 1996
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
($ IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-3-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
Six Year
FY 1995
FY 1996
Authorization
DOJ
Other Agey
Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Totals
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
New
Total
FTE's
Auth.
Anth.
PREVENTION:
Model Intensive Prevention
DOJ
626
---
---
48.216
43.394
43.394
100.000
100.000
Ounce of Prevention Council
DOJ
90
2
2
7.088
14.700
1.559
2.084
15
14.700
14.700
FACES (Family & Community Endeavor Schools)
72.450
Community Schools Youth Services Grants
HHS
567
26
26
29.581
72.450
6.508
15.573
72.550
Family & Community Endeavor Schools Grants
DofEd
243
11
11
20.232
31.050
4.451
8.336
30.950
31.050
Local Crime Prevention Block Grants
DOJ
377
-
---
36.615
32.954
32.954
75.940
75.940
Assist for Delinq'nt & At-Risk Youth [Youth Academie
DOJ
36
-
---
2.604
0.573
0.573
5.400
5.400
Local Partnership Act
HUD
1,620
-
---
130.184
270.000
117.166
117.166
270.000
270.000
Community Economic Partnership
HHS
270
---
---
21.697
45.000
4.773
4.773
45.000
45,000
GREAT (Gang Resistance Education & Training]
Treasury
45
9
9
2.989
7.200
2.391
3.741
7
7.200
7.200
Missing Alzheimer's Patients
DOJ
3
---
---
0.900
0.198
0.198
0.900
0.900
Urban Recreation and At-Risk Youth
DOI
5
-
---
1.302
0.286
0.286
2.700
2.700
Prison Drug Treatment (State)
DOJ
270
-
---
13.018
2.864
2.864
27.000
27.000
Prison Drug Treatment (Federal)
DOJ
113
---
-
13.500
10.800
10.800
13.500
13.500
Violence Against Women Act
Law Enforcement & Prosecution Grants
DOJ/HH
800
26
26
130.000
28.600
37.700
130.000
130.000
Rape Prevention
HHS
205
---
---
35.000
35,000
7.700
7.700
35.000
35.000
Runaway, Homeless, and Street Youth
HHS
30
---
---
7.000
7.000
1.540
1.540
7.000
7.000
Domestic Violence Hotline
HHS
3
1
1
0.400
0.400
0.088
0.438
0.400
0.400
Encouraging Arrest Policies
DOJ
120
---
---
28.000
6.160
6.160
28.000
28.000
Battered Women's Shelters
HHS
325
---
---
50.000
50.000
11.000
11.000
50.000
50.000
Rural Domestic Violence Enforcement
DOJ
30
-
--
7.000
1.540
1.540
7.000
7.000
Community Programs On Domestic Violence
HHS
10
---
4,000
4.000
0.880
0.880
4.000
4.000
---
Youth Education & Domestic Violence
HHS
0
---
---
0.400
0.400
0.088
0.088
0.400
0.400
Number & Cost of Injuries Study
HHS
0
---
---
0.100
0.100
0.022
0.022
0.100
0.100
Victims of Child Abuse
38
---
---
0.000
0.000
Court Appointed Special Advocates
OJP
---
---
6.000
1.320
1.320
6.000
6.000
Training For Judicial Personnel & Practioners
OJP
---
---
0.750
0.165
0.165
0.750
0.750
Grants For Televised Testimony
OJP
0.055
0.250
0.250
---
---
0.250
0.055
Access To Federal Criminal Information - Stalker
DOJ
6
---
---
1.500
0.330
0.330
1.500
1.500
Family Unity - State Grants
OJP
19
--
---
1.562
0.344
0.344
3.240
3.240
Safety For Women - Parks/Transit
Capital Improvement - National Parks
DOI
10
---
-
10.000
10.000
2.200
2.200
10.000
10.000
Capital Improvements - Public Parks
DOI
15
---
--
15,000
15,000
3.300
3.300
15.000
15.000
10.000
Capital Improvements - Public Transporation
DOT
10
---
---
10.000
10.000
2.200
2.200
10.000
Misc. Provisions (Rpts, Training, Education)
DOJ/HH
7
-
---
0.000
0.000
1.600
1.600
Drug Courts
DOJ
1,000
29
100
106.558
23.443
33.593
221.000
150.000
Total Prevention
6,904
104
175
741
572
319
353
15
1,197
1,126
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
61.9%
970 = DOJ + Higher Agency Request
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
IS IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-3-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
Six Year
FY 1995
FY 1996
Authorization
DOJ
Other Agey
Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Totals
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
New
Total
FTE's
Auth.
Auth.
STATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Community Policing Grants
DOJ
8,800
1,300
1,332
1,882.000
414.040
869.040
310
1882.000
1850.000
DNA Identification (State Grants)
DOJ
40
---
---
0.482
0.106
0.106
1.000
1.000
Police Recruitment
DOJ
24
---
---
0.964
0.212
0.212
2.000
2.000
State Courts Assistance
DOJ
150
2.440
2.440
23.000
23.000
-
---
11.090
DOJ
130
...
24.000
24.000
Technical Assistance
---
State Grants
OJP
---
---
4.822
1.061
1.061
Quantico Training/Intelligence Gathering
FBI
--
---
4,000
0.880
0.880
Techical Automation Improvement Quantico
FBI
---
---
10.000
2.200
2.200
q4 killion
Brady - Criminal Records Upgrade
DOJ
150
100
100
12.054
2.652
37.652
25.000
25.000
Community Based Prosecutors & Functions
DOJ
50
--
---
3.375
0.743
0.743
7.000
7.000
in bure
Rural Law Enforcement
Rural Law Enforcement Grants
DOJ
240
2.546
2.546
24,000
24.000
--
---
11.572
Rural Drug Enforcement Training
Treasury
5
---
---
0.482
1.000
0.106
0.106
1.000
1.000
Criminal Justice/Substance Abuse Training
DOJ
1
---
---
0.000
0.000
1.000
1.000
TB Prevention & Treatment In Correctional Institutions
DOJ
5
---
---
0.338
0.074
0.074
0.700
plused
0.700
Police Corps
DOJ
100
---
-
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Police Corps In Service Scholarships
DOJ
100
--
---
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Es
0.265
2.500
2.500
Family Support
DOJ
25
---
---
1.205
0.265
Byrne Grants
DOJ
1,000
450
580
260.000
57.200
214.700
260.000
130.000
Violent Repeat Offender Incarceration
DOJ
7,895
25
175
434.188
95.521
104.096
900.500
750.000
Certain Punishment for Youthful Offenders
DOJ
150
---
---
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Criminal Alien Incarceration
DOJ
1,800
130
130
300.000
99.000
141.900
300.000
300.000
Total State and Local Law Enforcement
20,665
2,005
2,317
2,966
1
685
1,384
310
3,514
3,201
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
84.4%
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 P.L. 103-322
($ IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-3-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
Six Year
FY 1995
FY 1996
Authorization
DOJ
Other Agey
Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Totals
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
New
Total
FTE's
Anth.
Anth.
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Treasury Authorizations
Treasury
550
30
70.000
70.000
56.000
56.000
351
70.300
70.000
2.4
0.000
0.360
Office of Enforcement
2.7
0.000
0.405
FinCEN
0.000
1.050
BATF
7
U.S. Customs
4
0.000
0.600
Internal Revenue Service
7
0.000
1.050
U.S. Secret Service
6.6
0.000
0.990
Justice Authorizations
DOJ
199
---
---
0.000
0.000
40.000
40.000
Wireless Communications
FBI
--
---
8,000
6.400
6.400
Automated Booking Stations
GA
---
-
11.000
8.800
8.800
4
Freedom of Information Automation
GA
---
-
4.500
3.600
3.600
13.200
40
U.S. Marshals - Courthouses
USMS
---
---
16.500
13.200
245
35.000
35.000
---
FBI
---
Technical Support Center
FBI
---
---
16.100
12.880
12.880
Advanced Telephony
FBI
-
---
18.900
15.120
15.120
DEA (Annualization of 1995 Agents)
DOJ
150
---
---
8.035
6.428
6.428
58
12.000
12.000
Heroin Domestic Enforcement
-
---
3.965
3.172
3.172
15
DOJ
50
4.000
5.000
5.000
---
---
5.000
4.000
US Attorneys
SCAMS - Telemarketing Fraud (FBI/USA)
20
--
---
0.000
0.000
2.000
2.000
FBI
---
-
0.750
0.600
0.600
FBI Agents
-
U.S. Attorneys
USA
---
0.250
0.200
0.200
Public Awareness & Prevention
OJP
---
---
0.500
0.400
0.400
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
DOJ
5
-
-
1.500
1.200
1.200
1.500
1.500
185,000
Improving Border Controls
DOJ
675
181
228
232.000
185.600
212.750
810
232.000
DOJ
18
--
---
3.400
2.720
2.720
20
3.400
3.400
Criminal Alien Tracking Center
Expeditious Deportation
DOJ
338
49
64
84.400
67.520
74.870
754
105.000
90.000
Expanded Special Deportation
DOJ
160
54
55
55.000
44.000
52.100
380
55.000
54.000
3.680
30
5.500
5,500
DNA (FBI)
DOJ
25
-
---
4.600
3.680
Presidential Summit On Violence/Nat'l Commission
DOJ
1
-
---
1,000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1.000
Anti-Gang/Drug Grants In Federally Assisted Housing
DOJ
1
---
-
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1.000
Family Unity - Federal Prisoners
OJP
-
--
0.360
0.288
0.288
0.360
0.360
Violence Against Women
Federal Victim Counselors
USA
---
---
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.500
1.000
---
---
Training Programs
OJP
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
OJP
---
---
0.200
0.160
0.160
0.200
0.200
State Databases Study
National Baseline Study on Campus Sexual Assault
OJP
-
---
0.200
0.160
0.160
0.200
0.200
The Judiciary
Judiciary
200
-
---
30.000
30.000
24.000
24.000
?
30.000
30.000
Judiciary
1
1.300
1.300
1.040
1.040
?
1.300
1.300
Training Judges/Court Personnel
---
---
Total Federal Law Enforcement
2,643
314
377
580
101
464
511
2,462
602
539
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
96.3%
30,212
2,422
2,869
4,287
675
1,468
2,249
2,787
5,313
4,866
Total Funding
Total Trust Fund Available
30,210
2,423
2,423
4,287
2,334
4,287
4,287
Funds Under (Over) Allocated
1
(446)
o
85
(1,026)
(579)
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
If IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-3-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
Six Year
FY 1995
FY 1996
Authorization
DOJ
Other Agey
Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Totals
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
New
Total
FTE's
Anth.
Anth.
PREVENTION:
Model Intensive Prevention
DOJ
626
---
-
48.216
43.394
43.394
100.000
100.000
Ounce of Prevention Council
DOJ
90
2
2
7.088
14.700
1.559
2.084
15
14.700
14.700
FACES (Family & Community Endeavor Schools)
Community Schools Youth Services Grants
HHS
567
26
26
29.581
72.450
6.508
15.573
72.550
72.450
Family & Community Endeavor Schools Grants
DofEd
243
11
11
20.232
31.050
4.451
8.336
30.950
31.050
Local Crime Prevention Block Grants
DOJ
377
---
---
36.615
32.954
32.954
75.940
75.940
Assist for Delinq'nt & At-Risk Youth [Youth Academie
DOJ
36
---
-
2.604
0.573
0.573
5.400
5.400
Local Partnership Act
HUD
1,620
---
---
130.184
270.000
117.166
117.166
270.000
270.000
Community Economic Partnership
HHS
270
-
---
21.697
45.000
4.773
4.773
45.000
45,000
GREAT (Gang Resistance Education & Training]
Treasury
45
9
9
2.989
7.200
2.391
3.741
0
7.200
7.200
Missing Alzheimer's Patients
DOJ
3
--
-
0.900
0.198
0.198
0.900
0.900
Urban Recreation and At-Risk Youth
DOI
5
---
--
1.302
0.286
0.286
2.700
2.700
Prison Drug Treatment (State)
DOJ
270
-
---
13.018
2.864
2.864
27.000
27.000
Prison Drug Treatment (Federal)
DOJ
113
-
-
13.500
10.800
10.800
13.500
13.500
Violence Against Women Act
Law Enforcement & Prosecution Grants
DOJ/HH
800
26
26
130.000
28.600
37.700
130.000
130.000
Rape Prevention
HHS
205
---
---
35.000
35.000
7.700
7.700
35.000
35.000
Runaway, Homeless, and Street Youth
HHS
30
---
--
7.000
7.000
1.540
1.540
7.000
7.000
Domestic Violence Hotline
HHS
3
1
1
0.400
0.400
0.088
0.438
0.400
0.400
Encouraging Arrest Policies
DOJ
120
-
-
28.000
6.160
6.160
28,000
28.000
Battered Women's Shelters
HHS
325
-
---
50.000
50.000
11.000
11.000
50.000
50.000
Rural Domestic Violence Enforcement
DOJ
30
-
-
7.000
1.540
1.540
7.000
7.000
Community Programs On Domestic Violence
HHS
10
-
4.000
4.000
0.880
0.880
4.000
4.000
---
Youth Education & Domestic Violence
HHS
0
-
---
0.400
0.400
0.088
0.088
0.400
0.400
Number & Cost of Injuries Study
HHS
0
---
---
0.100
0.100
0.022
0.022
0.100
0.100
Victims of Child Abuse
38
-
-
0.000
0.000
Court Appointed Special Advocates
OJP
---
---
6.000
1.320
1.320
6.000
6.000
Training For Judicial Personnel & Practioners
OJP
---
---
0.750
0.165
0.165
0.750
0.750
Grants For Televised Testimony
OJP
0.055
0.250
0.250
---
-
0.250
0.055
Access To Federal Criminal Information - Stalker
DOJ
6
---
---
1.500
0.330
0.330
1.500
1.500
Family Unity - State Grants
OJP
19
---
-
1.562
0.344
0.344
3.240
3.240
Safety For Women - Parks/Transit
Capital Improvement - National Parks
DOI
10
-
-
10.000
10.000
2.200
2.200
10.000
10.000
Capital Improvements - Public Parks
DOI
15
-
---
15.000
15.000
3.300
3.300
15.000
15.000
10.000
Capital Improvements - Public Transporation
DOT
10
---
---
10.000
10.000
2.200
2.200
10.000
Misc. Provisions (Rpts, Training, Education)
DOJ/HH
7
---
---
0.000
0.000
1.600
1.600
Drug Courts
DOJ
1,000
29
100
106.558
23.443
33.593
221.000
150.000
Total Prevention
6,904
104
175
741
572
319
353
15
1,197
1,126
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
61.9%
970 - DOJ + Higher Agency Request
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
It IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-3-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
Six Year
FY 1995
FY 1996
Authorization
DOJ
Other Agey
Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Totals
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
New
Total
FTE's
Anth.
Anth.
STATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Community Policing Grants
DOJ
8,800
1,300
1,332
1,882.000
414.040
869.040
310
1882.000
1850.000
DNA Identification (State Grants)
DOJ
40
--
---
0.482
0.106
0.106
1.000
1.000
Police Recruitment
DOJ
24
---
-
0.964
0.212
0.212
2.000
2.000
2.440
23.000
23.000
State Courts Assistance
DOJ
150
---
---
11.090
2.440
DOJ
130
24.000
24.000
Technical Assistance
---
---
State Grants
OJP
---
---
4.822
1.061
1.061
Quantico Training/Intelligence Gathering
FBI
---
---
4.000
0.880
0.880
Techical Automation Improvement Quantico
FBI
-
---
10,000
2.200
2.200
Brady - Criminal Records Upgrade
DOJ
150
100
100
12.054
2.652
37.652
25.000
25.000
Community Based Prosecutors & Functions
DOJ
50
---
---
3.375
0.743
0.743
7.000
7.000
Rural Law Enforcement
Rural Law Enforcement Grants
DOJ
240
2.546
2.546
24.000
24.000
---
---
11.572
Rural Drug Enforcement Training
Treasury
5
---
---
0.482
1.000
0.106
0.106
1.000
1.000
Criminal Justice/Substance Abuse Training
DOJ
1
---
0.000
0.000
1.000
1.000
---
TB Prevention & Treatment In Correctional Institutions
DOJ
5
---
-
0.338
0.074
0.074
0.700
0.700
Police Corps
DOJ
100
---
---
9.643
2.121
2.121
20,000
20.000
Police Corps In Service Scholarships
DOJ
100
---
---
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
DOJ
25
0.265
0.265
2.500
2.500
---
---
Family Support
1.205
Byrne Grants
DOJ
1,000
450
580
260.000
57.200
214.700
260.000
130.000
Violent Repeat Offender Incarceration
DOJ
7,895
25
175
434.188
95.521
104.096
900.500
750.000
Certain Punishment for Youthful Offenders
DOJ
150
---
---
9.643
2.121
2.121
20.000
20.000
Criminal Alien Incarceration
DOJ
1,800
130
130
300.000
99.000
141.900
300.000
300.000
Total State and Local Law Enforcement
20,665
2,005
2,317
2,966
1
685
1,384
310
3,514
3,201
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
84.4%
OMB/Duke/x53451
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 - P.L. 103-322
1$ IN MILLIONS)
REVISED: 10-3-94
Crime Act Programs
Provision
Six Year
FY 1995
FY 1996
Authorization
DOJ
Other Agey
Outlays
Req. Add't
Available
1996
Totals
Enacted
Authorized
Request
Requests
New
Total
FTE's
Auth.
Auth.
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Treasury Authorizations
Treasury
550
30
70.000
70.000
56.000
56.000
351
70.300
70.000
2.4
0.000
0.360
Office of Enforcement
2.7
0.000
0.405
FinCEN
0.000
1.050
BATF
7
U.S. Customs
4
0.000
0.600
Internal Revenue Service
7
0.000
1.050
U.S. Secret Service
6.6
0.000
0.990
DOJ
199
---
0.000
0.000
40.000
40.000
Justice Authorizations
---
Wireless Communications
FBI
---
-
8.000
6.400
6.400
Automated Booking Stations
GA
---
...
11.000
8,800
8.800
4
Freedom of Information Automation
GA
---
---
4.500
3.600
3.600
13.200
40
U.S. Marshals - Courthouses
USMS
---
-
16.500
13.200
245
35.000
35.000
---
-
FBI
Technical Support Center
FBI
---
---
16.100
12.880
12.880
Advanced Telephony
FBI
-
---
18.900
15.120
15.120
DEA (Annualization of 1995 Agents)
DOJ
150
---
---
8.035
6.428
6.428
58
12.000
12.000
---
---
3.965
3.172
3.172
15
Heroin Domestic Enforcement
DOJ
50
4.000
5,000
5.000
-
---
5,000
4,000
US Attorneys
SCAMS Telemarketing Fraud (FBI/USA)
20
...
-
0.000
0.000
2.000
2.000
FBI Agents
FBI
---
---
0.750
0.600
0.600
U.S. Attorneys
USA
---
--
0.250
0.200
0.200
Public Awareness & Prevention
OJP
---
---
0.500
0.400
0.400
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
DOJ
5
---
-
1.500
1.200
1.200
1.500
1.500
185.000
Improving Border Controls
DOJ
675
181
228
232.000
185.600
212.750
810
232.000
DOJ
18
---
---
3.400
2.720
2.720
20
3.400
3.400
Criminal Alien Tracking Center
Expeditious Deportation
DOJ
338
49
64
84.400
67.520
74.870
754
105.000
90.000
Expanded Special Deportation
DOJ
160
54
55
55.000
44.000
52.100
380
55.000
54.000
3.680
30
5.500
5.500
DNA (FBI)
DOJ
25
---
---
4.600
3.680
Presidential Summit On Violence/Nat'l Commission
DOJ
1
---
---
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1.000
Anti-Gang/Drug Grants In Federally Assisted Housing
DOJ
1
...
---
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
1,000
OJP
-
-
0.360
0.288
0.288
0.360
0.360
Family Unity - Federal Prisoners
Violence Against Women
Federal Victim Counselors
USA
---
---
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.500
1.000
---
---
Training Programs
OJP
1.000
0.800
0.800
1.000
OJP
---
0.200
0.160
0.160
0.200
0.200
State Databases Study
---
National Baseline Study on Campus Sexual Assault
OJP
---
---
0.200
0.160
0.160
0.200
0.200
The Judiciary
Judiciary
200
-
30.000
30.000
24.000
24.000
?
30.000
30.000
---
Judiciary
1
1.300
1.300
1.040
1.040
7
1.300
1.300
Training Judges/Court Personnel
---
---
Total Federal Law Enforcement
2,643
314
377
580
101
464
611
2,462
602
539
FY96 DOJ Request As Portion of FY96 Available Authorizations
96.3%
30,212
2,422
2,869
4,287
675
1,468
2,249
2,787
5,313
4,866
Total Funding
Total Trust Fund Available
30,210
2,423
2,423
4,287
2,334
4,287
4,287
Funds Under (Over) Allocated
1
(446)
0
85
(1,026)
(579)
4,516 = DOJ + Higher Agency Request
OMB/Duke/x53451
Office of the Attorney General
Washington, B. C. 20530
September 22, 1994
The Honorable Alice M. Rivlin
Acting Director
Office of Management and Budget
Washington, D.C. 20503
Dear Alice:
I have the pleasure of submitting to you the 1996 budget
request for the Department of Justice (DOJ). This 1996 budget
totals $17.5 billion, of which $16.0 billion is for discretionary
programs, including $4.287 billion in funding from the Violent
Crime Reduction Trust Fund (VCRTF) ($440.8 million of which is
for non-DOJ programs), to enable us to perform our critical
missions for Fiscal Year 1996. This represents a $3.8 billion
increase above the $12.2 billion in discretionary authority
recently enacted by the Congress for the Department's 1995
appropriation. However, excluding the effects of the Crime bill,
the vast majority of which supports State and local law
enforcement programs, the actual growth for the Department from
1995 to 1996 in discretionary programs is $1.9 billion.
Our 1996 budget request for discretionary programs reflects
a $2.1 billion increase above the $13.9 billion planning ceiling
for discretionary spending (including VCRTF funding) that was
outlined in former Director Panetta's letter of April 21, 1994.
A more detailed descriptive narrative and chart supporting this
1996 budget request are enclosed. In addition, a chart is
enclosed which reflects the items in the Violent Crime Control
and Law Enforcement Act that would be funded from the VCRTF.
In view of the bi-partisan support the President has
recently received from Congress for the historic passage of the
Crime bill and the support Congress has also shown for DOJ within
the 1995 appropriations act, this budget seeks to both maintain
and build on the anti-crime momentum by providing resources for
vital initiatives facing DOJ in 1996 and beyond. The Crime bill
certainly provides valuable resources; however, as mentioned
earlier, the bill largely funds State and local programs and does
not meet many of DOJ's needs. In fact, for specific areas, the
The Honorable Alice M. Rivlin
2
passage of the Crime bill drives us to increase our resources in
1996, outside those funded through the VCRTF. While
$4.3 billion is funded of the $4.9 billion authorized in 1996 in
the Crime bill -- 88 percent of the authorizations, we recognize
that there is more than a $575 million difference between the
1996 authorizations contained in the Crime bill and the funding
available in the VCRTF. Given this fact, we have, of course,
allocated only what is available in the fund for VCRTF programs.
Because the Crime bill is a top priority of the Administration,
we believe that the Administration should search for full funding
for all the programs authorized by the bill, including prevention
programs, within the 1996 domestic discretionary ceiling. As you
know, expectations regarding the Crime bill are very high, and
funding the programs below the authorized levels may reinforce
existing skepticism about the prospects of the Crime bill's
success.
At a rally on July 28, 1994, for the Crime bill in the Great
Hall of the Main Justice Building, President Clinton clearly
articulated the effect that crime has in all aspects of American
society. The President said, "look at the cost of crime to the
economy. Look at the cost of crime to our sense of community and
to the idea that we are an American family. Look at the cost of
crime to our efforts to empower every individual, including all
these young people that are growing up in terribly difficult
circumstances." There will be continuing demands upon and
challenges to the Department beyond the Crime bill itself to
which this 1996 budget request attempts to respond.
While I recognize our budget request is above the 1996
ceiling set by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), I
firmly believe the initiatives within our request are consistent
with the priority the President has placed on the Federal
Government's anti-crime efforts. It should be noted that this
budget request does not reflect the effects of our streamlining
review currently being prepared. Our streamlining plan will be
submitted to you by October 3, 1994, as per my staff's
discussions with Christopher Edley. Furthermore, we are also
sending you a list of reductions to our request that would get us
down to the 1996 ceilings.
In a brief form, I would like to summarize the five major
initiatives included in our 1996 budget request, some of which
would be funded from the VCRTF.
For the Department's responsibilities regarding detention of
unsentenced prisoners as well as incarceration of sentenced
offenders, a total of $555 million is being requested. Of these
funds, $195 million is being requested for activation of six new
prison facilities and five prison expansions. The total number
of beds that would be activated under this request is 9,197. The
The Honorable Alice M. Rivlin
3
activation of new facilities as they are completed is critical to
the effort of lowering overcrowding. As of August 25, 1994, the
overcrowding rate was 36 percent above rated capacity. Using
single bunking standards as done in the State systems, the
Federal Prison System's overcrowding would exceed 70 percent.
In acknowledgement of tight budget times, the Department has
decided to amend its overcrowding goal to a rate of 15 percent,
rather than the previous goal of 2 percent.
To address long-term housing needs, and to support efforts
to reduce overcrowding and provide adequate detention housing,
$286 million is being requested for prison construction.
The resources for prison construction would be used for new
facilities in the Western region and at Beaumont, Texas.
Further, $20 million is being requested for site acquisition and
contract costs related to housing Federal detainees and sentenced
inmates in Hawaii, $20 million for the Cooperative Agreement
Program, and $20 million to fund construction of holding cells
and related court house facilities required by the U.S. Marshals
Service (USMS). In addition to costs related for sentenced
prisoners, $14 million is being requested to support the number
of jail days expected for 1996.
In 1996, one of my top priorities will be continuance of
existing and implementation of new comprehensive measures that
protect against illegal immigration and promote legal
immigration. A total of $148.6 million is being requested for
four Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) initiatives.
These include: (1) strengthening border management; (2) reducing
incentives for illegal immigration while improving delivery of
customer services; (3) promoting professional development of INS
personnel; and (4) continuing the Institutional Hearing Program
(IHP) initiative.
Under an initiative endorsed by the Director of
Investigative Agency Policies, $78.1 million is requested for the
Department's efforts, under the auspices of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) and the Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA), to maintain our ability to perform vital, court-
authorized, Title III electronic surveillance intercepts. These
efforts are performed within our Advanced Telephony Program.
Continuing advances in the telecommunications industry have put
law enforcement in a catch up position. Law enforcement agencies
are already experiencing instances where an approved Title III
could not be conducted because our equipment could not contend
with today's technology. The Advanced Telephony Program needs
this influx of resources to support continuing research,
development and equipment acquisition in digital
telecommunications.
The Honorable Alice M. Rivlin
4
As a part of "reinventing" law enforcement, a goal of the
National Performance Review, a total of $419.3 million is
requested for infrastructure needs of our law enforcement
agencies. Many of these infrastructure requests, such as
automation, obviate the need to request full-time equivalent
(FTE) workyears, which can be more costly over the long term.
I believe we must give our law enforcement agents the tools
necessary for them to do their jobs. These infrastructure needs
of the Department for 1996 include the following: automated
booking stations, Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts
Document Processing System, tactical operations; Federal wireless
communications and other radio system equipment upgrades; office
automation in the FBI, DEA, INS, and the USMS, as well as the
Justice Consolidated Office Network (JCON) i automobiles; antenna
lease sites; contract linguists; and deoxyribonucleic acid
testing research and development in the FBI Laboratory, among
others.
In support of State and local law enforcement, an additional
$1.107 billion is requested. We are seeking continuation of the
$450 million funding level provided for the Edward Byrne formula
grants in 1995 ($260 million of which will come from the VCRTF)
and an increase of $50 million in Edward Byrne discretionary
grants. We are seeking an enhancement of $42.5 million in
juvenile justice program funding. In addition, our request
includes an increase of $220 million for the State Criminal Alien
Assistance Program (SCAAP), all from the VCRTF. As you may
recall, the Administration submitted a 1995 amendment of
$350 million for SCAAP; however, Congress provided only
$130 million in the 1995 appropriation. Other program increases
cover programs authorized through the Violent Crime Control and
Law Enforcement Act programs, most of which were funded in 1995.
But over $193 million is requested for authorized programs that
were not funded in 1995.
I would like to call your attention to two new exhibits, to
be included in some of our detailed budget submissions, that
respond to the emphasis OMB is placing on performance information
detailed in your August 5, 1994, memorandum and the Circular A-11
instructions. The Mission Statement and General Goals and
Objectives Exhibit and the Performance Goals and Indicators
Exhibit represent the Department's first attempt to provide
additional performance information in preparation for full
implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act.
I am pleased overall with the quality of this initial
effort. For example, the Executive Office for Immigration Review
has stated as a goal that it will complete 91 percent of its
criminal alien deportation cases prior to the aliens' earliest
possible release date. One of the Environmental and Natural
The Honorable Alice M. Rivlin
5
Resources Division's goals is to recover at least $25 in civil
recoveries, penalties and natural resource damages for every
$1 spent by the Environmental Enforcement Section. The USMS has
set as a goal that less than 50 percent of forfeited real
property will remain in its inventory pending disposal for more
than 12 months.
As this is the first time many components have tried to
articulate specific performance goals, we recognize there is room
for improvement, and we intend to continue to refine the
performance measures. Exhibits from most of those components are
included in this package, and we anticipate that exhibits from
several others will be forwarded to you shortly.
I look forward to continuing to work with you on the 1996
budget for the Department of Justice.
Justens Janet Reno
Sincerely
Enclosures
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FY 1996 BUDGET SUBMISSION TO THE
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
The Department of Justice is requesting a 1996 budget of
$17,540,970,000 in budget authority, 94,935 permanent positions,
and 110,115 FTE. This includes 94,935 permanent positions,
101,476 FTE, and $15,997,557,000 in discretionary budget
authority (including $4,287,000,000 from the Violent Crime
Reduction Trust Fund (VCRTF) (of which $440,758,000 is for non-
DOJ programs) A chart is enclosed which reflects the items in
the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act that would be
funded from the VCRTF.
The request includes funding for initiatives relating to prison
construction and activation, immigration, infrastructure,
advanced telephony, and State and local assistance.
We have included a request of $53,073,000 for Administratively
Determined pay as a program increase. The Department is
requesting this funding to bring attorneys salaries in all
departmental components up to the level of the Administratively
Determined pay scale used for the U.S. Attorneys. The attorneys
in these components perform similar functions, and this would
create a more uniform internal compensation system. This request
would require a legislative change for compensation of employees
currently under the General Schedule. This request includes the
annual cost of the conversion to Administratively Determined pay.
General Administration
The 1996 budget request includes enhancements that support
Administration program priorities and management improvements.
The General Administration appropriation is requesting a total of
1,525 positions, 1,613 FTE (including 110 reimbursable FTE), and
$188,201,000 in the 1996 budget request. Program enhancements
totalling $29,466,000 are being requested to support all decision
units within the General Administration appropriation. The
request also reflects mandatory increases totalling $21,702,000,
including 112 FTE and $8,431,000 for the annualization of the
FY 1995 positions associated with the President's Immigration
Initiative.
The Department Leadership decision unit is requesting $11,000,000
to support the Department's joint Automated Booking Station (ABS)
initiative. Under the auspices of the Office of the Deputy
Attorney General (ODAG), this request is being made to support
recurring laboratory and initial acquisition costs associated
with the Miami laboratory and other possible expansion labs.
Innovative solutions to improve current booking procedures
identified by the Department's working group will be tested in
the Miami laboratory environment. An additional lab(s) will be
considered for implementation in FY 1995. Based on favorable
analysis and supporting benefit-cost analyses, an effective
Department-level strategy will be developed to identify and
consolidate the requirements of participating law enforcement
components into a joint ABS acquisition.
The Executive Support decision unit is requesting $4,500,000 to
support the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (FOIPA)
Laboratory initiative. The purpose of the laboratory is to
eliminate unnecessary and redundant search and retrieval
procedures and increase cooperation and research sharing both
within the Department and with other federal agencies. This
request is being made to support a contract, to be competitively
awarded, for a FOIPA Document Processing System based on the
findings of the Department's working group, including the Office
of Information and Privacy (OIP), and the use of the laboratory.
Also, within the Executive Support decision unit, a program
enhancement of $50,000 is being requested for the Office of
Policy Development (OPD). This request is being made to support
OPD's increased automated legal research requirements associated
with the large number of judicial candidates being reviewed.
The Intelligence Policy and Professional Responsibility decision
unit includes a program increase of 4 positions, 2 FTE, and
$264,000 for the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR).
This request will enable OPR to hire the necessary support
personnel so that attorneys can spend more time investigating
allegations of attorney misconduct and reducing case backlogs.
Additionally, this request will allow OPR to purchase the
necessary equipment and contractor support for a more timely
response to informational inquiries and a more efficient means
for storing and accessing closed files.
The Administrative Review and Appeals decision unit includes a
program enhancement for the Office of the Pardon Attorney (OPA).
This request includes 2 positions, 2 FTE, and $318,000 to allow
OPA to respond to the continuing increase in case submissions and
correspondence. The additional resources will ensure proper
administration of the President's constitutional pardoning power,
provide informed and timely reports to accompany the Department's
recommendations, and prevent long delays in case processing and
case and correspondence backlog.
The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) is requesting
a program enhancement of $3,000,000 to fund its Justice
Consolidated Office Network (JCON) initiative. EOIR's office
automation and case tracking system, the Automated Nationwide
System for Immigration Review (ANSIR), is a closed system. The
ANSIR life-cycle expires during 1995 and it is essential that
EOIR be converted to an open system environment. The transition
to an open system is in support of National Performance Review
(NPR) guidance and Department of Justice policy. This request
-2-
will greatly enhance EOIR's communication and program
coordination with other Department components, particularly the
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS)
The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) is also
requesting a program enhancement of 88 positions, 44 FTE, and
$6,900,000. This program increase represents a re-request of
resources not provided in the Immigration Initiative portion of
the 1995 Crime Bill. These resources would enable EOIR to fund
the rest of the asylum reform and expedited deportation
activities as authorized.
Finally, the 1996 budget request for the General Administration
appropriation includes $3,424,000 for an Administratively
Determined pay increase to augment salaries to bring the
attorneys within the Departmental components up to the level of
the U.S. Attorneys. The attorneys in these components perform
similar functions, and this would effectively create a more
uniform internal compensation system.
Office of the Inspector General
The 1996 budget request for the Office of the Inspector General
is 331 positions, 408 FTE, and $32,114,000. This represents a
5 percent increase for mandatory requirements, or $1,630,000
above the 1995 appropriation anticipated.
United States Parole Commission
The 1996 budget request for the U.S. Parole Commission is
53 positions, 78 FTE, and $6,890,000. The request is $560,000
lower than the 1995 appropriation of $7,450,000. The request
includes a net increase of $336,000 for mandatory requirements,
an increase of $108,000 for Administratively Determined pay, and
a reduction of 20 positions, 15 FTE, and $1,004,000 for the
continued downsizing of the Commission.
General Legal Activities
For 1996, the General Legal Activities (GLA) appropriation seeks
a total resource level of 3,717 positions, 4,021 FTE, and
$514,673,000. The requested funding level is 123 positions,
115 FTE, and $93,239,000 higher than the 1995 appropriated level.
Specific program increases for each organization within GLA are
set out below.
Office of the Solicitor General
The total request for the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG)
for 1996 is 48 positions (22 attorneys), 54 FTE, and $6,534,000.
The request includes program increases of 1 position, 3 FTE, and
$463,000. This includes 1 position (1 attorney), 1 FTE, and
-3-
$89,000 for the restoration of the Administration's 1995
personnel level reduction, $150,000 for unfunded positions and
FTE, and 2 FTE and $108,000 for 2 existing law clerk positions.
These requested increases are required for OSG to effectively
address the workload of the office. An increase of $116,000 for
Administratively Determined pay is also requested.
Tax Division
The total requested by the Tax Division for 1996 is 672 positions
(385 attorneys), 643 FTE, and $69,707,000. Contained in this
request are program increases of 12 positions (6 attorneys),
6 FTE, and $6,952,000 including:
a program increase of $555,000 for technology investments in
the Management and Administration program;
a program increase of 12 positions (6 attorneys), 6 FTE, and
$771,000 for a criminal enforcement initiative in the
Criminal Tax Prosecution program;
and a program increase of $5,626,000 for Administratively
Determined pay.
Criminal Division
The total requested by the Criminal Division for 1996 is
737 positions (408 attorneys), 776 FTE, $87,033,000. Included in
this request is a program increase of $4,852,000 for
Administratively Determined pay.
Civil Division
The total requested by the Civil Division for 1996 is
1,036 positions (642 attorneys), 1,084 FTE, and $160,361,000.
Contained in this request are program increases of 8 positions
(6 attorneys), 4 FTE, and $26,313,000 including:
a program increase of 8 positions (6 attorneys), 4 FTE, and
$2,014,000 for health care fraud in the Commercial Branch;
a one-year increase of $16,620,000 for automated litigation
support in the Commercial Branch, to be available until
expended;
and a program increase of $7,679,000 for Administratively
Determined pay.
Environment and Natural Resources Division
The total requested by the Environment and Natural Resources
Division is 526 positions (275 attorneys), 759 FTE (including
-4-
242 reimbursable FTE for Superfund), and $73,828,000. Included
in this request are net program changes of 69 positions, 33 FTE,
and $10,939,000 including:
a program increase of 9 positions (6 attorneys), 5 FTE, and
$529,000 to allow the Division to litigate additional
National Environmental Protection Act challenges and to
provide sufficient resources to allow the Environment
Division to increase its level of client counselling;
an increase of 11 positions (1 attorney), 6 FTE, and
$412,775 to complement the Environmental Protection Agency's
multi-media enforcement initiative; to handle more wetlands
cases; and to handle coordination of environmental
enforcement efforts among the U.S. Attorneys Offices;
an increase of 4 positions (2 attorneys), 2 FTE, and
$209,000 to address Native American issues, such as water
rights and pollution on Indian lands.
a program increase of 5 positions (2 attorneys), 2 FTE, and
$280,000 to allow the Division to participate in the
enforcement of global environmental treaties, such as the
Marine Pollution Convention, and the Montreal Protocol;
a program increase of $5,141,000 for Administratively
Determined pay;
and; a program increase of 40 positions (21 attorneys),
18 FTE, and $4,367,000 to fully fund those initiatives that
were originally requested in the President's 1995 Budget.
Office of Legal Counsel
The Department is seeking 37 positions (22 attorneys), 41 FTE,
and $4,455,000 for the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in 1996.
This request includes a program increase of $285,000 for
Administratively Determined pay.
Civil Rights Division
The Department requests 596 positions (280 attorneys), 598 FTE,
and $74,812,000 for the Civil Rights Division in 1996. Mandatory
adjustments to base comprise $2,877,000 of this total. This
request includes program increases of 31 positions
(25 attorneys), 15 FTE, and $5,102,000 to enforce Federal civil
rights laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race,
gender, age, national origin or physical ability in voting,
housing, public accommodations, public institutions, education,
and employment. Also included is $4,131,000 for Administratively
Determined pay.
-5-
INTERPOL - United States National Central Bureau (USNCB)
Resources totaling 65 positions, 66 FTE, and $6,791,000 are
requested for the USNCB. This represents a program enhancement
of 2 positions, 1 FTE, and $78,000 to restore support personnel
in the Investigative Support Unit and the Financial Fraud Unit.
Legal Activities Office Automation (LAOA) Fund
To continue automation enhancements for the Divisions under the
GLA appropriation, U.S. Attorneys, Justice Management Division,
and senior management offices, a budget of $31,152,000 is
requested. This funding level includes a program increase of
$8,534,000 to fund Justice Consolidated Office Network (JCON)
implementation, including administering the JCON contract,
purchasing new equipment, engineering and wiring services, and
user training.
Antitrust Division
The Department requests 978 positions (including 410 attorneys),
926 FTE, and $96,719,000 for the Antitrust Division in 1996.
Mandatory adjustments comprise $3,232,000 of this total. This
request includes an increase of $2,804,000 in direct authority
for Administratively Determined pay. The request also includes
an increase of 124 positions (including 43 attorneys), 92 FTE,
and $10,238,000 in indirect authority. This revenue neutral
increase will be supported by additional fees anticipated as a
result of the Hart-Scott-Rodino premerger filing fee being raised
to $45,000 in 1995, and the projected collection of 2,208 filings
in 1996 (which is consistent with projected 1994 actual filings).
This growth in personnel will allow the Antitrust Division to
expand its level of review and enforcement to meet the demands of
the ever changing global marketplace.
United States Attorneys
The total requested by the United States Attorneys for 1996 is
8,807 positions, 9,530 FTE, and $940,160,000. The 1996 request
includes program increases totalling 490 positions, 245 FTE, and
$54,298,000. Of this amount, the majority of the requested
enhancements are for the following initiatives: a National Anti-
Violence and Gang Plan; Victim Witness Assistants; Health Care
Fraud; Native American Assistance; and Affirmative Civil
Litigation. As previously discussed with your staff, we will
provide additional details and a specific breakdown as soon as
possible.
We are also seeking an increase of $10,000,000 for the 1996
International Brotherhood of Teamsters election and $430,000 for
Administratively Determined pay to equalize the salaries of
-6-
attorneys in the Executive Office for United States Attorneys
with those paid to the United States Attorneys offices.
U.S. Marshals Service
The Department's request for the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS)
totals 4,023 positions, 4,034 FTE (including 62 reimbursable
FTE), and $469,248,000. Included in the request are mandatory
adjustments of $23,353,000 and net program increases of
169 positions, 120 FTE, and $53,668,000. The program increases
provide: 1) 167 positions, 119 FTE, and $29,275,000 to ensure
that new and renovated Federal courthouses can open on schedule
with adequate security; 2) $3,000,000 for security expenses of
high threat trials; 3) $2,096,000 for additional training
courses; 4) $1,023,000 for the development and implementation of
judicial security and prisoner transportation information
systems; 5) 2 positions, 1 FTE, and $9,685,000 for purchasing and
maintaining operational equipment; 6) $4,697,000 for office
automation, radios, and other communications requirements; and
7) $3,892,000 for permanent change-of-station moves, human
resources programs, and Administratively Determined pay for
attorneys.
Support of U.S. Prisoners
For the Support of U.S. Prisoners (SUSP) appropriation, a total
1996 funding level of $367,447,000 is requested. This request
consists of a $353,014,000 base funding request, and a program
increase of $14,433,000. This funding would support an estimated
4,980,000 contract jail days in 1996. When combined with Federal
jail days at Bureau of Prisons' detention facilities, a total of
7,600,000 jail days would be available. This would allow for
annual jail day usage growth of approximately 5 percent in both
1995 and 1996. The request of $20,000,000 in Cooperative
Agreement Program (CAP) funding, historically a part of the SUSP
request, is included in the Federal Prison System's Buildings and
Facilities request.
In response to the Attorney General's interest in considering a
transfer of responsibility from the USMS to the Bureau of Prisons
(BOP) for detainees housed at St. Elizabeth's Hospital in the
District of Columbia, BOP and the USMS are working on such a
proposal. Narrative explaining the transfer and detailed
resource information will be finalized in time for the
President's budget submission to Congress. It is anticipated
that BOP and the USMS will enter into a reimbursable agreement in
FY 1995 to enable BOP to assume responsibility for the detainees
prior to the actual transfer in FY 1996.
-7-
Community Relations Service
The Department requests 125 positions, 122 FTE, and $31,448,000
for the Community Relations Service (CRS) in 1996, including net
mandatory increases of $533,000.
The Department is seeking program increases totaling 9 positions,
5 FTE, and $633,000 to strengthen CRS's capacity to perform its
historic mission of conflict resolution. These increases
include: 4 positions, 2 FTE, and $190,000 to enhance CRS's
community policing effort; 4 positions, 2 FTE, and $190,000 to
address the increasing level of violence in elementary and
secondary schools; 1 position, 1 FTE, and $48,000 to provide
training and education to the Department's litigating divisions
and the Environmental Protection Agency involved in the
Administration's environmental justice initiative; $120,000 to
upgrade CRS's systems technology; and $85,000 for staff training
to improve productivity and service delivery.
To provide resettlement assistance to an estimated
18,000 entrants from Cuba and Haiti in 1996, the Department
requests an increase of $9,903,000 for the Care, Reception, and
Processing of Cubans and Haitians Program (CHEP).
U.S. Trustee System Fund
The Department requests a total 1996 resource level of
1,199 positions (232 attorneys), 1,118 FTE, and $119,424,000 for
the U.S. Trustee Program. This request includes a net mandatory
increase of $4,994,000 and net program increases of 55 positions
(20 attorneys), 28 FTE, and $11,496,000.
The Department seeks 55 positions (20 attorneys), 28 FTE, and
$3,539,000 in offsetting collections to enhance Chapter 11 case
supervision, to strengthen professional fee oversight and to
reform the post-confirmation process. A revision of the
Chapter 11 fee structure, which would require the debtor to make
quarterly payments until the case is dismissed or converted to
Chapter 7, will provide the offsetting collections needed to fund
these initiatives. The modification of the fee structure will
require legislative action.
The Department also requests $2,000,000 in a direct appropriation
to increase the number of Inspector General audits conducted
annually as part of the Private Trustee Supervision/Bankruptcy
Fraud Initiative. Finally, the Department is seeking a program
increase of $5,957,000 for Administratively Determined pay.
-8-
Organized Crime Drug Enforcement
The request for the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement (OCDE)
appropriation totals 4,012 positions, 3,956 FTE, and
$389,276,000. No program change is requested in 1996.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
In the Department's 1996 budget submission, 23,043 positions
(9,991 agents), 25,454 FTE, and $2,587,504,000 are requested for
the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Enhancements total
756 positions (150 agents), 383 FTE, and $261,330,000. In this
submission, each individual program request falls under one of
five initiatives: Director of Investigative Agency Policies
(DIAP) ; Emerging Organized Criminal Enterprises; State and Local
Assistance; Strengthening/Restoring FBI Infrastructure; and
Improving Efficiency and Effectiveness.
The total DIAP initiative request of 73 positions, 40 FTE, and
$122,093,000 includes an Advanced Telephony program request of
31 positions, 19 FTE, and $55,351,000 to support development of
technology to deal with the dramatically changing digital
environment in the telecommunications industry. Also included is
a $16,100,000 request for the Technical Support Center to finance
the construction of a national center for Federal, State, and
local law enforcement agencies for the conduct of Title III
electronic surveillance. Additionally, 8 positions, 4 FTE, and
$8,000,000 are requested under the Federal Wireless Communication
program to fund research and development efforts, pursuant to a
National Telecommunications and Information Administration rule
change and the National Performance Review Efficiency Initiative
#04. (It is anticipated that the Treasury's $8,000,000 portion
for this wireless initiative will be provided through the VCRTF.)
Furthermore, a 34 position, 17 FTE, and $42,642,000 request for
the Tactical Operations program will provide additional resources
for the FBI's undercover missions.
The total Emerging Organized Criminal Enterprises Initiative
request of 252 positions (150 agents), 126 FTE, and $26,851,000
includes 252 positions (150 agents), 126 FTE, and $23,122,000 to
address emerging Russian and Eastern European organized crime.
In addition, $3,729,000 is requested to enable the FBI and DEA to
collocate in ten foreign offices in accordance with DIAP
Resolution #6.
The total State and Local Assistance Initiative request of
$13,148,000 includes $6,167,000 to pay the overtime expenses of
State and local police officers participating in the Safe Streets
Task Force program. An additional $1,616,000 is requested for
the Child Abduction/Serial Murder Task Forces program to
establish child abduction/exploitation task forces as well as
provide training for Bureau of Indian Affairs police at the FBI
-9-
Academy. Furthermore, $4,165,000 is requested to implement the
Combined Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Index System and to provide
supplies for anticipated increases in DNA identification
workload. Lastly, $1,200,000 is requested to employ contractors
to expand the FBI's DRUGFIRE system at additional sites.
The total Strengthening/Restoring FBI Infrastructure Initiative
request is 381 positions, 191 FTE, and $77,602,000. This
includes 330 positions, 165 FTE, and $27,421,000 to reduce a
shortfall in the FBI's existing field support staff. In
addition, a 51 position, 26 FTE, and $19,052,000 request for the
automated data processing program will provide additional
computer workstations, network servers, portable computers,
document scanners, and electronic technicians. Funding of
$18,900,000 is requested under the automobiles program to replace
1,500 vehicles currently exceeding the General Services
Administration's replacement standard for passenger automobiles.
Also, $626,000 is requested to provide permanent aircraft
maintenance and inspection enhancements to the FBI's aviation
program. For the antenna site lease program, $8,103,000 is
requested to lease additional antenna sites and to accommodate
the rising rental costs of existing antenna sites. Funding of
$3,500,000 is requested for the foreign language program. Of
this amount, $3,000,000 would employ additional contract
linguists, and $500,000 would develop enhanced foreign language
proficiency examinations for FBI language specialists.
The total request for the Improving Efficiency and Effectiveness
Initiative is 50 positions, 26 FTE, and $8,405,000. This request
would enable nationwide implementation of the Background
Investigation Contract Services Program under the security
reinvestigations program.
In addition to these five initiatives, an enhancement of
$13,231,000 is requested to expand and improve investigative
training for State, Indian tribal, and local law enforcement
agencies. This funding will also support improvements to
training facilities at Quantico.
Drug Enforcement Administration
The Department's 1996 request for DEA totals 5,806 positions
(including 2,917 agents), 6,865 FTE (including 987 FTE to be
reimbursed by the OCDE appropriation), and $875,595,000. This
request includes program increases of 55 positions (30 agents),
28 FTE, and $66,602,000 to fund 5 initiatives: heroin threat,
communications exploitation, cooperative information systems,
special projects, and Administratively Determined pay.
DEA is requesting a total of 55 positions (30 agents), 28 FTE,
and $8,038,000 for its heroin threat initiative. This initiative
will allow DEA to expand and establish heroin investigative
-10-
groups in the U.S. cities that have experienced a rise in heroin
seizures and to establish a country office in Beijing, Peoples
Republic of China.
For the communications exploitation initiative, DEA is requesting
a total of $8,850,000. This initiative will provide $2,250,000
for additional contract linguists to transcribe Title III wire
intercepts. In addition, $6,600,000 is requested to provide
integrated digital technology to four field divisions in 1996.
DEA is requesting a total of $45,100,000 for its cooperative
information systems initiative. This initiative includes
$7,400,000 for operations and maintenance of DEA's new office
automation equipment, $33,000,000 for the second phase of DEA's
information system infrastructure upgrade, $2,000,000 for
operation and maintenance of DEA's new intelligent workstations
(Project Merlin), and $2,700,000 for data center charges and
operations and maintenance costs for DEA and FBI's intelligence
sharing system (DRUGX).
DEA is also requesting $3,600,000 for a classified project and
$1,014,000 for Administratively Determined pay.
Diversion Fee Account
For the Diversion Fee Account, DEA is requesting a total of
588 positions, 584 FTE, and $45,441,000. This includes mandatory
adjustments of $2,334,000 over the 1995 enacted level.
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS)
The Department's 1996 request for INS totals 14,510 positions,
21,626 FTE, and $2,239,088,000, including the fee-funded
accounts. This total consists of 14,510 positions, 14,463 FTE,
and $1,546,750,000 for the Salaries and Expenses appropriation;
3,312 FTE and $370,220,000 for the Immigration User Fee Fund;
3,715 FTE and $304,572,000 for the Immigration Examinations Fee
Fund (estimates for this fund are still being revised) ; 63 FTE
and $5,965,000 for the Land Border Inspection Fee Fund; 25 FTE
and $1,823,000 for the Immigration Legalization Fund; 48 FTE and
$6,358,000 for the Breach Bond/Detention Fund; and $3,400,000 for
the Enforcement Fines Fund.
This request includes 545 positions, 334 FTE, and $148,640,000 in
enhancements over the 1996 base for INS Salaries and Expenses
appropriation and its User and Land Border Fee accounts.
Included in this request are resources to fund four initiatives.
The four initiatives are: Strengthening Border Management
(107 positions, 109 FTE, and $89,238,000); Reducing Incentives
for Illegal Immigration while Improving Delivery of Customer
Services (88 positions, 45 FTE, and $23,051,000); Promoting the
Professional Development of INS Employees (18 positions, 13 FTE,
-11-
and $4,340,000); and an Institutional Hearing Program (IHP)
initiative (332 positions, 167 FTE, and $23,199,000). In
addition, this budget request includes a base adjustment to the
Border Patrol base program of $10,730,000 to provide agent
mobility.
The first initiative, Strengthening Border Management, will
expand our ability to control the Southwest border from the first
phase of INS' strategy, which began with El Paso and San Diego,
to the second phase of its strategy, which includes Arizona and
major crossing points in Southeast Texas. Included in this
initiative are resources to address the immigration pressure both
between and at the ports-of-entry (POEs) as well as deter illegal
aliens from entering the country from overseas posts.
For efforts between the POEs, the Department is requesting
15 positions, 7 FTE, and $29,317,000. This includes a technical
adjustment of $10,730,000 to the Border Patrol's base program for
agent mobility that will allow Border Patrol agents to respond
rapidly to shifts in alien migration along our borders. Also
included are technology enhancements for the Border Patrol
program ($1,000,000) and enhanced detention and removal
capabilities (15 positions, 7 FTE, and $17,587,000) that will
provide an additional 1,010 beds for illegal aliens.
With regard to gaining control at land POEs, the Department
requests a total of 159 positions, 79 FTE, $8,761,000. As INS
gains control between the POEs, a significant amount of traffic,
both legal and illegal, will permanently shift to the land border
POEs. This enhancement includes 92 positions, 46 FTE, and
$4,440,000 for additional inspectors to address the increase of
illegal traffic at land POEs. In addition, 33 FTE and $4,320,000
are requested in INS' Land Border User fee account to facilitate
the increased level of legal traffic at land POEs. These
resources will allow INS to facilitate the flow of low-risk
traffic while intensifying inspection of high risk traffic.
INS will expand the use of Dedicated Commuter Lanes, conduct
electronic inspections, and establish automated permit ports at
selected locations.
With regard to air POEs, the Department is requesting a total of
23 FTE and $17,791,000 in its Immigration User Fee account for
this initiative. Included in this request are $8,850,000 for
automation and other technologies to continue its re-engineering
and streamlining initiatives with the goal of further improving
the facilitation of the inspection process while increasing its
ability to detect mala fide entrants. Also included are 23 FTE
and $8,941,000 to prevent illegal entry through overseas
deterrence. Recognizing that "border management" is not limited
to our immediate borders, this enhancement will allow INS to
pursue proactive international enforcement, thereby reducing
-12-
illegal activities at their sources and at the key overseas
transit locations.
This initiative also requests $44,100,000 for automation
enhancements not funded in 1995. These funds would support
systems development and deployment for the major expansion of the
use of automation in the performance of enforcement operations
and in the processing of entrants at designated POEs.
The second initiative, Reducing Incentives for Illegal
Immigration while Improving Delivery of Customer Services,
addresses the needs of employers and government entities to
verify immigration status quickly and accurately, while providing
a research and analysis capability to make informed policy
decisions on immigration matters. The Department requests a
total of 88 positions, 45 FTE, and $23,051,000. This includes:
41 positions, 21 FTE, and $4,239,000 to implement an alien
employment verification system and to expand the Law Enforcement
Service Center (formerly named the National Criminal Alien
Tracking Center); 19 positions, 10 FTE, and $2,472,000 for an
expanded research and analysis branch at INS; $6,440,000 for the
"Ask Immigration" telephone system; and $9,900,000 for the
removal of aliens denied political asylum.
Under the third initiative, Promoting the Professional
Development of INS Employees, INS will apply emerging computer-
based learning technology to efficiently and effectively
distribute a variety of training modules designed to enhance the
professionalism of field employees at their work sites. The
Department requests 18 positions, 9 FTE, and $3,135,000 in INS'
salaries and expenses appropriation and 4 FTE, and $1,205,000 in
its User Fee account for a total of 18 positions, 13 FTE, and
$4,340,000 for this initiative.
The fourth initiative, the Institutional Hearing Program, will
expand our efforts directed toward the rapid removal of criminal
aliens from Federal and State prison facilities. The Department
is requesting a total of 332 positions, 167 FTE, and $23,199,000
for this program. These resources will allow INS to expand this
program in the five States with the highest concentration of
criminal aliens. INS received an enhancement of 61 positions,
96 FTE, and $16,900,000 in FY 1995 for this initiative. However,
this request did not include the necessary resources for the
"removal" portion of the program. This is because the workload
associated with the removal, or final orders of deportation, was
not expected to increase until 1996. This increase represents
the second year of funding for the 1995 initiative.
Finally, the INS request includes $8,812,000 for Administratively
Determined pay for attorneys.
-13-
Federal Prison System
The total 1996 funding request for the Federal Prison System
(FPS) is 31,708 positions, 31,900 FTE (including 127 reimbursable
FTE), and $3,303,912,000. This request includes total program
increases of 2,428 positions, 851 FTE, and $545,474,000. The
funding request by appropriation consists of: 31,330 positions,
29,164 FTE, and $2,887,257,000 for salaries and expenses (S&E) ;
327 positions, 324 FTE, and $401,328,000 for Buildings and
Facilities; 51 positions, 51 FTE, and $15,327,000 for the
National Institute of Corrections (NIC) i 1,851 FTE for Federal
Prison Industries (FPI); and 510 FTE for the Commissary Fund.
FPS's request is based on a number of agency and departmental
priorities, the foremost being the reduction of overcrowding in
Federal institutions and the challenges posed by a relentless
growth in the inmate population. During 1996, the institutional
inmate population is projected to rise from an average daily
population of 91,890 to 100,627. To support these additional
inmates, additional resources are needed to meet the food,
medical care, clothing, security, transportation and program
costs associated with the projected population increase. A
program increase of $15,464,000 is requested to support this
9 percent projected population growth.
To address the challenges posed by a growing population, FPS has
made concerted, continuous efforts to efficiently and effectively
house its inmate population. The most dramatic of these has been
the modification of the rated capacity guidelines. Despite the
fact that most State and local correctional institutions still
employ the one-inmate-per-cell rated capacity standard, FPS has
adopted policies that provide for double-bunking at every
security level. As of August 25, 1994, the overcrowding rate was
36 percent above rated capacity. Absent these changes in rated
capacity, FPS overcrowding would exceed 70 percent when compared
to the State standard.
The activation of new facilities as they are completed is
critical to the effort of lowering overcrowding. Failure to
activate facilities in a timely manner will keep overcrowding
high and result in millions of dollars in capital investment
standing idle. Thus, an increase of 2,334 positions, 703 FTE,
and $194,805,000 is sought for the activation of 6 new prison
facilities and 5 prison expansions.
The new bedspace consists of: Federal Correctional Institution
(FCI) Taft, California (512 minimum security beds, 1,536 low
security beds) ; Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn,
New York (1,229 detention beds) i FCI Beaumont, Texas (1,536 low
security beds) i FCI Forrest City, Arizona (1,536 low security
beds) ; FCI Yazoo, Mississippi (1,536 low security beds);
-14-
FPC Beaumont, Texas (512 minimum security beds) i FCI Tallahassee,
Florida, camp (150 beds); FCI Milan, Michigan, camp (150 beds) i
FCI Lompoc, California, Intensive Confinement Center (200 beds) ;
FCI Fort Worth, Texas, camp (150 beds) i and Federal Medical
Center Lexington, camp (150 beds). Also included in this
activation request is equipment funding for a Federal Medical
Center in Butner, North Carolina, for medical and low security
inmates.
For contract confinement programs, increases totaling $27,361,000
are requested to expand the use of alternatives to incarceration.
This enhancement will support an increase in the average daily
population at community correction centers of 1,300 inmates, as
well as an additional 308 inmates housed in State and local
correctional facilities. These programs help to ease
overcrowding in Bureau of Prisons (BOP) institutions by placing
inmates in State, local and contract facilities.
Medical program increases totaling 9 positions, 9 FTE, and
$12,175,000 are requested for 1996. These consist of:
$7,575,000 for the testing and treatment of infectious diseases;
$910,000 for a loan repayment program to attract and retain
qualified medical staff; $500,000 for environmental consulting;
and 9 positions, 9 FTE, and $3,190,000 for kidney dialysis at
Federal Medical Center Springfield, Missouri.
For drug treatment programs, 37 positions, 25 FTE, and $1,702,000
are requested to provide for an additional drug treatment
programming, including five new residential drug treatment
programs. To expand the bus transportation center at
Terre Haute, Indiana, $684,000 is sought. Finally, a program
increase of $3,283,000 is requested to fund an Administratively
Determined pay scale for attorney positions.
To address long-term housing needs and to support efforts to
reduce overcrowding and provide adequate detention housing,
program increases totaling 48 positions, 45 FTE, and $285,755,000
are requested for the Buildings and Facilities (B&F)
appropriation. For B&F new construction detention needs,
6 positions, 6 FTE and $20,000,000 are requested for BOP to
pursue a contract capable of housing both Federal detainees and
sentenced inmates in Hawaii, and $20,000,000 for the Cooperative
Agreement Program (CAP). Also, a program increase of
$20,051,000, in addition to a base transfer of $2,300,000 from
the USMS, is requested to fund the construction of holding cells
and related court house facilities required by the USMS.
To address long-term overcrowding in sentenced offender housing,
with the intent of maintaining an overcrowding level of
115 percent in the outyears compared to the previous goal of
102 percent, the B&F new construction request includes
-15-
6 positions, 3 FTE, and $108,900,000 to construct one 1,152-bed
medium security facility and a 512-bed satellite camp in the
Western Region (likely George Air Force Base), and 6 positions,
6 FTE, and $64,500,000 to complete construction of a 1,152 bed
medium security facility at the Beaumont, Texas, Federal
Corrections Complex. Also requested are 8 positions, 8 FTE, and
$14,831,000 to expand existing facilities with the addition of
4 Intensive Confinement Centers (boot camps) and 4 general
expansions.
To protect the Federal Government's enormous investment in prison
facilities, program increases of 22 positions, 22 FTE, and
$37,473,000 are requested to protect and upgrade the capital
investment in existing facilities. Included in the modernization
and repair request are 4 positions and FTE and $3,370,000 for
life safety improvements at 4 institutions; 1 position and FTE
and $1,156,000 for the removal of hazardous waste at
1 institution; 9 positions and FTE and $12,986,000 for general
improvements at 9 institutions; 1 position and FTE and $7,228,000
for a major renovation at 1 institution; 6 positions and FTE and
$9,840,000 for utility improvements at 6 institutions; and
1 position and FTE and $2,893,000 for energy resources
improvements at 1 institution.
For the National Institute of Corrections (NIC), a program
increase of $5,000,000 over the 1996 base is requested to allow
for increased technical assistance in 1996. NIC is a highly
valued member of the Nation's correctional system because it
provides services to Federal, State and local correctional
systems. Under the newly enacted Violent Crime Control and Law
Enforcement Act, which provides considerable funding for State
and local governments, NIC will play an important implementation
role.
The FPI and the Commissary Trust Fund seek 1,851 and 510 FTE,
respectively. For FPI, program changes consist of an increase of
50 FTE for new activations. Program changes for the Commissary
Trust Fund include 19 FTE for new activations and expansions.
Weed and Seed Program Fund
The request for the Weed and Seed Program Fund includes only
inflationary increases. Of the total request of $13,500,000,
$12,667,000 is for Weed and Seed grants, and $833,000 is for
administration of the program.
Community Policing Program
The 1996 request for the Community Policing Program is
$1,902,250,000, 310 positions, and 310 FTE. The request includes
program changes of $602,250,000 180 positions, and 180 FTE. Of
the total increase, $582,000,000, 180 positions, and 180 FTE is
-16-
requested for the Cops on the Beat Program, which would result in
total 1996 funding of $1,882,000,000 for this program and allow
for the planned hiring of approximately 20,000 police officers in
1996. It is estimated that 97,920 police officers will be hired
or rehired over the next 6 years. Added to the 2,080 police
officers, funded through the 1993 Community Policing
supplemental, this achieves the President's goal of hiring
100,000 police officers.
The balance of the increase, $20,250,000, is requested to
implement Crime Control Act programs that were not funded in
1995. These programs include the Police Recruitment Program, the
Police Corps Program, and the Law Enforcement Scholarship
Program. The specific funding levels that are requested for each
of these policing programs is reflected in the attached charts.
Office of Justice Programs
The total 1996 request for the Office of Justice Programs (OJP)
is $2,188,734,000, 557 positions, and 537 FTE. The request
provides base funding to continue the Regional Information
Sharing System, Missing Children, White Collar Crime Information
Center, the Byrne formula grants, Correctional Options grants,
and Victims of Child Abuse Act grants at the 1995 level. The
request also includes program increases of $1,107,412,000,
120 positions, and 90 FTE.
The program increases include $50,000,000 in Byrne discretionary
grants to allow the Department to respond to emerging State and
local issues that involve an immediate response; an increase of
$42,500,000 to implement the second phase of a comprehensive long
term strategy to address the problem of serious, violent, and
chronic juvenile offenders; $1,000,000 for the National Institute
of Justice to continue the conduct of a comprehensive
longitudinal study on the causes of delinquency and criminal
behavior; $3,175,000 for several criminal justice statistical
collection efforts, including the collection of data on Brady Act
and National Child Protection Act background checks; and $201,000
for Administratively Determined pay for attorneys.
The request also provides increases for Crime Control Act
programs that, although funded in 1995, are authorized at
significantly higher levels in 1996. These increases include
$220,000,000 for the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program,
$409,688,000 for State Correctional Program grants, $77,558,000
for the Drug Courts program, $104,000,000 for Violence Against
Women Act grants, and $5,588,000 for the Ounce of Prevention
program. In addition, total program increases of $193,702,000
are included for a number of new Crime Control Act programs that
were not funded in 1995. The increase of 120 positions and
90 FTE, included in the request, is required to implement and
administer these new Crime Control programs and to support the
-17-
overall increase in Crime Control grant resources. Funding for
administration of the Crime Control programs is drawn from Crime
Control program dollars, as was allowed by the Congress in 1995.
A summary of the total program changes and the base request for
OJP and the allocation of these resources between direct spending
and Crime Control resources are reflected on the attached charts.
Crime Victims Fund
For the Crime Victims Fund, the Department is requesting that all
collections deposited into the Fund be obligated. A total of
$165,025,000 is estimated to be collected in 1995 for obligation
in 1996.
Public Safety Officer's Benefits
The request for the Public Safety Officer's Benefits (PSOB)
program includes an inflationary increase as required by law.
With the total amount requested, $28,474,000 is included for the
Death Benefits program and $2,134,000 is included for the
Disability Benefits program.
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission
The total requested by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission
is 9 positions, 9 FTE, and $990,000. This includes a program
increase of $85,000 for Administratively Determined pay.
Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund
The Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund is requesting
$16,264,000 to continue payments to eligible claimants in 1996.
Current projections indicate that the Trust Fund will run out of
funds to pay claims in 1996 without the increase. Over the
course of 1995, legislation may be introduced in Congress
expanding the eligible pool of claimants to the Trust Fund.
Should this occur, the Department may need to request even more
funding.
Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund
Administrative Expenses
The total 1996 request for the Administrative Expenses of the
Trust Fund will be $2,655,000. No program increases are being
requested for 1996.
Change in General Provisions
The Department is amending transfer authority language in the
General Provisions section of the Department of Justice and
-18-
Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1995 to allow transfers of
funding provided to the Department in the Violent Crime Reduction
Trust Fund. This amendment would give the Department the
flexibility to allow transfers of funding between all accounts of
the Department, except Justice Assistance, should existing
priorities change.
We are also requesting that the authority for undercover
operations be extended for 1996 and thereafter. This language
was enacted in 1993 for three years, and the authority must now
be extended.
21-Sep-94
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
04:47 PM
996 REQUEST
96OMB
(Dollars in Thousands)
1995
1996 CHANGES
1996 OMB REQUEST
DOJ APPROPRIATIONS
VIOLENT CRIME
APPROPRIATION
ADJUSTMENTS
PROGRAM
VIOLENT CRIME
(less procurement savings)
REDUCTION TRUST FUND
ENACTED
TO BASE
CHANGES
DIRECT
REDUCTION TRUST FUND
1996 OMB REQUEST
APPROPRIATION
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
DISCRETIONARY
FUNCTIONAL CODE 750
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
1,114
1,341
119,643
224
112
17,400
1,338
1,453
137,043
3
112
21,702
94
48
29,456
1,213
1,345
139,521
312
268
48,680
1,525
1,613
188,201
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
331
408
30,484
...
...
...
331
408
30,484
--
***
1,630
...
...
...
331
408
32,114
-
-
***
331
408
32,114
COMMUNITY POLICING
...
...
...
130
98 1,300,000
130
96
1,300,000
...
32
...
180
180
602,250
...
...
-
310
310
1,902,250
310
310
1,902,250
WEED AND BEE D FUND.
7
7
13,456
...
...
...
7
7
13,456
...
...
44
...
...
...
7
7
13,500
-
...
...
7
7
13,500
NATIONAL DRUG INTELLIGENCE CENTER
[256]
222
...
...
...
...
[256]
222
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
[256]
222
...
...
...
-
[256]
222
...
WORKING CAPITAL FUND
...
751
...
...
...
...
751
...
...
...
...
...
***
...
751
...
-
...
...
...
751
-
U.S. PARQUE COMMISSION
73
93
7,450
...
73
8
7,450
--
...
336
(20)
(15)
(896)
53
78
6,890
--
...
...
53
78
6,890
GENERAL LEGAL ACTIVITIES
3,536
3,875
416,834
58
31
4,600
3,594
3,906
421,434
-
50
25,590
123
65
67,649
3,659
3,963
507,082
58
58
7,591
3,717
4,021
614,673
BOLICITOR GENERAL
47
51
5,796
47
51
5,798
...
273
1
3
463
48
54
6,534
...
...
48
54
6,534
TAX DIVISION
660
637
59,529
...
...
...
660
637
59,529
--
...
3,226
12
6
6,952
672
643
69,707
...
...
...
672
643
69,707
CRIMINAL DIVISION
737
773
77,243
...
...
737
773
77,243
-
...
4,938
...
3
4,852
737
776
87,033
-
...
-
737
776
87,033
CML DIVISION
970
1,019
120,365
68
31
4,600
1,028
1,050
124,965
...
30
9,083
a
4
26,313
978
1,026
152,770
56
58
7,591
1,036
1,084
160,361
ENVR & NATE RESOURCES
457
706
58,170
...
...
...
457
706
58,170
...
20
4,719
69
33
10,939
526
759
73,828
...
...
...
626
759
73,828
LEGAL COUNSEL
37
41
3,967
...
...
...
37
41
3,967
--
...
203
...
285
37
41
4,455
-
...
...
37
41
4,455
CML RIGHTS
565
583
62,702
...
...
...
565
583
62,702
...
...
2,877
31
15
9,233
596
598
74,812
--
...
...
696
598
74,812
INTERPOL
63
65
6,451
...
...
...
63
65
6,451
..
...
262
2
1
78
65
66
6,791
-
...
...
65
66
6,791
LACA
...
22,609
...
...
...
...
22,609
-
...
9
...
8,534
...
31,152
...
...
...
...
31,152
ANTITRUST DIVISION
404
391
41,003
...
...
404
391
41,003
...
...
3,232
...
...
2,804
404
391
47,039
--
...
...
404
391
47,039
U.S. ATTORNEYS
8,237
9,205
844,024
80
40
6,600
8,317
9,245
850,824
-
40
35,038
490
245
54,298
8,660
9,413
925,179
147
117
14,961
8,807
9,530
940,160
US. MARSHALS
3,854
3,837
396,782
...
...
...
3,854
3,837
396,782
...
77
18,798
169
120
53,668
3,982
3,994
452,748
41
40
16,500
4,023
4,034
469,246
SUPPORT OF U.S. PRISONERS
...
296,753
...
...
...
...
...
296,753
...
...
56,261
...
...
14,433
***
367,447
...
...
...
...
367,447
COMMUNITY RELATIONS SERVICE
116
117
20,379
...
...
...
116
117
20,379
...
***
533
9
5
10,536
125
122
31,448
--
...
...
125
122
31,448
U.S. TRUSTEES
[799]
761
82,580
...
...
...
[799]
761
62,586
--
...
4,472
...
...
7,957
[700]
761
75,015
--
...
...
(799)
761
75,015
ASSETS FORF FUND CURR BUD AUTH.
...
55,000
...
...
...
001
55,000
--
...
...
...
...
...
...
55,000
--
!
...
...
55,000
ORGANIZED CRIME DRUG ENFORCEMENT
[4,012]
[3,956]
374,943
...
...
...
(4,012)
(3,956)
374,943
***
...
14,333
...
[3,956]
...
[4,012]
[3,956]
389,276
...
-
...
[4,012]
[3,956]
369,276
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
22,287
24,591
2,203,596
...
...
...
22,287
24,591
2,203,595
--
480
122,579
756
383
261,330
23,025
25,440
2,525,154
10
14
62,350
23,043
25,454
2,587,504
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
5,751
6,685
756,513
...
...
5,751
6,685
756,513
...
152
52,480
55
28
66,602
5,723
6,797
663,505
83
68
12,000
5,806
6,665
875,595
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALEATION SERVICE
12,629
12,664
1,102,475
1,336
866
100,600
13,965
13,530
1,203,075
...
650
86,036
545
274
88,037
12,803
12,905
1,221,969
1,707
1,558
155,179
14,510
14,483
1,377,148
INS CONSTRUCTION
...
50,000
...
...
...
...
50,000
-
-
(50,000)
...
...
...
-
...
--
...
-
...
...
...
BORDER CONTROL
...
...
...
...
154,600
...
...
154,600
--
...
(21,800)
...
...
36,802
...
...
...
...
...
169,602
...
...
169,602
IMMIGRATION EMERGENCY FUND
...
...
75,000
...
...
...
...
...
75,000
--
...
(75,000)
...
...
...
...
...
...
-
...
...
...
...
...
FEDERAL PRBON TEM
BALARIES AND EXPENSES
28,950
26,042
2,351,634
...
...
...
28,950
26,042
2,351,634
...
2,385
280,149
2,380
737
255,474
31,330
29,164
2,873,757
-
...
13,500
31,330
29,164
2,887,257
NATE INSTITUTE OF CORRECTIONS
51
51
10,302
...
...
...
51
51
10,302
-
-
25
...
***
5,000
51
51
15,327
...
...
...
51
61
15,327
BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES
305
296
276,301
...
...
...
305
296
276,301
(26)
(17)
(160,728)
48
45
285,755
327
324
401,328
--
...
...
327
324
401,328
FEDERAL PRBON INDUS TRIES
...
1,723
...
...
...
...
...
1,723
...
--
78
...
...
50
...
...
1,851
-
--
...
...
...
1,851
...
COMMBSARY FUND
...
464
...
...
...
...
464
27
19
...
510
-
...
510
...
TOTAL FEDERAL PRBON SYSTEM
29,306
28,576
2,638,237
...
...
...
29,306
28,576
2,638,237
(26)
2,473
119,446
2,428
851
546,229
31,708
31,900
3,290,412
...
...
13,500
31,708
31,900
3,303,912
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS:
JUSTICE ASSISTANCE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE
...
...
27,000
...
...
...
...
...
27,000
-
...
690
...
...
1,000
...
...
28,690
--
...
...
...
...
28,690
BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS
...
...
21,379
...
...
...
...
...
21,379
...
641
...
...
3,175
...
...
25,195
...
...
...
...
25,195
MISSING CHILDFEN/ALZHEIMER'S
...
...
6,721
...
...
...
...
...
6,721
--
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
6,721
-
...
...
...
...
6,721
REGIONAL INFORMATION SHARING BYSTEM
...
...
14,500
***
...
...
...
...
14,500
-
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
14,500
...
...
...
...
...
14,500
WHITE COLLAR CRIME INFOR CENTER
1,400
...
...
...
1,400
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
1,400
...
...
...
-
...
1,400
MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
365
364
31,777
72
67
3,095
437
431
34,872
...
16
3,764
120
90
10,291
365
375
37,121
192
162
11,806
557
537
48,927
1
SUBTOTAL
365
364
102,777
72
67
3,095
437
431
105,872
...
16
5,095
120
90
14,466
365
375
113,627
192
162
11,806
657
537
125,433
STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT:
FORMULAGRANTS
...
...
...
***
...
450,000
...
...
450,000
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
190,000
-
...
260,000
...
...
450,000
DISCRETIONARY GRANTS
...
-
50,000
...
...
...
...
...
60,000
--
...
...
-
...
50,000
...
...
100,000
...
...
...
100,000
CORRECTIONAL OPTIONS
...
12,000
...
...
12,000
-
...
...
...
12,000
...
...
...
12,000
SUBTOTAL
***
***
62,000
...
450,000
...
...
512,000
--
...
...
...
50,000
...
...
302,000
...
...
260,000
...
...
562,000
21-Sep-94
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
04:47 PM
1996REQUEST
96OMB
(Dollars In Thousands)
1995
1996 CHANGES
1996 OMB REQUEST
DOJ APPROPRIATIONS
VIOLENT CRIME
APPROPRIATION
ADJUSTMENTS
PROGRAM
VIOLENT CRIME
(less procurement savings)
REDUCTION TRUST FUND
ENACTED
TO BASE
CHANGES
DIRECT
REDUCTION TRUST FUND
1996 OMB REQUEST
APPROPRIATION
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
POS
FTE
BA
JUVENILE JUSTICE PROGRAMS
...
139,200
...
...
...
139,200
-
...
...
***
...
42,500
...
...
181,700
-
-
...
...
...
161,700
VICTIMS OF CHILD ABUSE ACT
...
...
11,250
...
...
...
...
...
11,250
--
***
...
...
...
...
...
...
11,250
-
-
...
-
-
11,250
CRIMINAL RECORDS UPGRADE
...
...
...
...
...
99,000
...
...
99,000
...
...
...
...
-
...
...
-
87,067
-
I
11,933
...
-
99,000
STATE CORRECTIONAL GRANTS
...
...
...
...
...
24,255
...
...
24,255
-
...
...
...
...
405,591
***
***
...
-
...
429,846
-
...
429,846
DRUG COURT PROGRAM
...
---
...
...
...
28,710
...
...
28,710
...
...
...
...
...
76,782
...
...
...
-
-
105,492
-
-
105,492
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT
...
...
...
...
...
25,740
...
...
25,740
-
...
...
...
...
102,960
...
***
...
-
-
128,700
...
...
128,700
OUNCE OF PREVENTION COUNCIL
...
...
...
...
...
1,500
...
...
1,500
--
...
...
-
...
5,532
...
...
...
...
-
7,032
...
...
7,032
CRIME CONTROL PROGRAMS NOT IN 1990
PREVENTION
***
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
***
...
156,240
...
...
...
-
...
156,240
...
...
156,240
PRISONS
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
***
...
...
...
...
335
...
...
...
...
...
335
...
...
335
$ TATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
-
...
...
...
...
32,221
...
...
...
--
-
32,221
...
...
32,221
FEDERAL
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
2,985
...
...
...
..
...
2,965
...
...
2,985
SUBTOTAL
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
191,781
...
...
...
...
...
191,781
...
...
191,781
B TATE CRIMINAL ALEN ASSISTANCE PROG
..
...
...
128,700
128,700
.M
...
***
...
217,800
-
:
49,500
-
-
297,000
...
***
346,500
TOTAL OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
365
364
315,227
72
67
761,000
437
431
1,076,227
--
16
5,095
120
90 1,107,412
365
375
745,144
192
162
1,443,600
557
537
2,188,734
PSOB
...
...
2,072
...
...
...
...
2,072
...
...
82
...
...
...
-
...
2,134
-
-
---
...
-
2,134
SUBTOTAL DOMESTIC DISCRETIONARY
88,010
93,888
9,822,456
1,900
1,214
2,345,000
89,910
95,102
12,167,456
67
4,091
420,867
4,949
2,274
2,948,567
92,058
96,872
11,690,667
2,868
2,596
3,846,223
94,926
101,467
15,536,890
...
FUNCTIONAL CODE: 150
FOREIGN CLAIMS BE TTLEMENT COMMISSION
9
9
830
...
...
...
9
9
830
...
...
75
...
...
85
9
9
990
-
...
...
9
9
990
FUNCTIONAL CODE: 050
RADIATION EXPOSURE COMP ADMINEXP
...
...
2,655
...
...
...
...
2,655
--
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
2,655
--
...
...
...
...
2,655
RADIATION EXPOSURE COMP TRUE FUND
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
16,264
...
...
16,264
...
...
...
...
...
16,264
FUNCTIONAL CODE: 800
CML LIBERTIES PUBLIC EDUCATION
...
...
5,000
...
...
...
...
...
5,000
--
...
(5,000)
...
...
...
...
...
...
-
...
...
-
-
...
SUBT, DISCRETIONARY AUTH
88,019
93,897
9,830,941
1,900
1,214
2,345,000
89,919
95,111
12,175,941
67
4,091
415,942
4,949
2,274 2,964,916
92,067
96,551
11,710,576
2,868
2,595 3,846,223
94,935
101,476
15,556,799
OTHER AGENCIES VCC
...
...
...
...
- -
78,000
...
...
78,000
-
...
...
...
...
362,758
I
...
...
-
***
440,758
-
-
440,758
TOTAL DISCRETIONARY AUTH
88,019
93,897
9,830,941
1,900
2,423,000
89,919
95,111
12,253,941
67
4,091
415,942
4,949
2,274 3,327,674
92,067
96,661
11,710,576
2,868
2,595 4,286,961
94,935
101,478
16,997,657
MANDATORY
FUNCTIONAL CODE: 700
FEES AND EXPENSES OF WITNESSES
...
...
77,962
...
...
...
...
...
77,982
...
...
15,180
...
...
...
-
***
93,162
-
...
...
...
...
93,162
PROB
...
...
27,645
...
...
...
27,645
-
...
829
...
...
...
...
***
28,474
-
...
...
...
---
28,474
INDEPENDENT COUNSEL
...
4,000
...
...
...
...
...
4,000
...
...
(1,116)
...
***
...
...
...
2,884
-
...
...
...
!
2,884
FUNCTIONAL CODE: 800
CIVIL LIB. PUB EDUCATION FUND
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
--
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
--
...
...
...
...
-
SUBT. MANDATORY AUTHORITY
...
...
109,627
...
...
...
...
...
109,627
...
...
14,893
...
...
...
...
...
124,520
-
...
...
...
-
124,520
PRE MERGER FILING FEES
[450]
443
39,442
...
...
...
[450]
443
39,442
...
...
...
[124]
92
10,238
[574]
535
49,680
...
...
...
[574]
535
49,680
U.S. TRUSTEES
[345]
321
40,348
...
...
...
[345]
321
40,348
...
B
522
(55)
28
3,539
[400]
357
44,409
...
...
...
[400]
357
44,409
ASSETS FORF FUND PERM BUD AUTH
...
...
422,000
-
...
...
...
422,000
...
...
159
...
...
(159)
...
422,000
--
...
...
...
422,000
DIVERSION CONTROL FEE
[588]
584
43,107
-
...
...
[588]
584
43,107
--
...
2,334
...
...
...
(588)
564
45,441
...
...
...
(588)
584
45,441
IMMIGRATION USER FEE
[3,305]
3,201
338,052
...
...
...
[3,305]
3,201
338,052
-
...
11,109
[51]
111
21,059
[3,356]
3,312
370,220
--
...
...
[3,356]
3,312
370,220
ENFORCEMENT FINES
...
...
3,400
...
...
...
...
3,400
...
...
-
...
...
...
...
3,400
---
...
...
...
3,400
IMMIGRATION LEGALIZATION
[27]
58
3,482
...
...
...
(27)
58
3,482
...
...
154
...
(33)
(1,813)
[27]
25
1,823
-
...
...
[27]
25
1,823
IMMIGRATION EXAMINATIONS FEE
[4,122]
3,715
291,097
...
...
[4,122]
3,715
291,097
...
...
13,475
...
...
[4,122]
3,715
304,572
...
...
...
[4,122]
3,715
304,572
LAND BORDER INSPECTION FEE
30
1,584
...
30
1,584
...
...
61
(67)
33
4,320
(67)
63
5,965
...
...
...
(67)
3
5,965
BREACHED BOND/DETENTION FUND
(48)
48
6,200
...
...
...
[48]
48
6,200
...
...
158
...
...
(48)
48
6,358
...
...
...
[48]
48
6,358
CRIME VICTIMS FUND
160,218
...
160,218
-
...
4,807
***
...
...
...
165,025
-
...
...
165,025
SUBT. FEE-FUNDED ACCOUNTS
[8,885]
8,400
1,348,930
...
...
...
(8,885)
8,400
1,348,930
...
8
32,779
(297)
231
37,184
[9,182]
8,639
1,418,893
...
...
...
[9,182]
8,639
1,418,893
TOTAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
88.019
102.297
11.289.498
1,900
1.214.2.423,000
89.919
103.511
13,634,496
67
4.099
463.614
4,949
2.505
3,002,100
92.067
107.520
13.253.989
2.868
95 4,286.901
94.935.110.115
17,540,970
Note: The 1996 Domestic Discretionary request Includes $3,846,242,000 for the Violent Crime Reduction Trust Fund for
the Department of Justice.
,
Includes $11,806,000 or 1 percent of the funds from Crime Control Act programs to be used for program administration,
with the exception of the Edward Byme grants.
Violent Crime Control & Law Enforcement Act of 1994
09/21/94
1996 Proposed Funding
02:08 PM
(Dollars in thousands)
1995-1996
1995-1996
Total
Total
DOJ
1995
1995
1996
Total
Authorized
1996 Funding Proposal
Crime Bill Program
Agency
Authorized
Appropriated
Authorized
Authorized
Less 1995 Approp.
Amount
FTE
Prevention
Department of Justice:
State and Local Funding/Grants:
Certain Punishment for Young Offenders
OJP
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$9,643
Ounce of Prevention Grant Program
OJP
$1,500
$1,500
14,700
16,200
14,700
7,088
Local Crime Prevention Block Grant Program
OJP
75,940
75,940
75,940
36,615
Model Intensive Grant Program
OJP
100,000
100,000
100,000
48,216
Assistance for Delinquent & At-Risk Youth
OJP
5,400
5,400
5,400
2,604
Family Unity Demonstration Project: State Grants
OJP
3,240
3,240
3,240
1,562
Res. Substance Abuse Treatment for State Prisoners
OJP
27,000
27,000
27,000
13,018
Violence Against Women:
Grants to Combat Violent Crimes Against Women
OJP
26,000
26,000
130,000
156,000
130,000
130,000
Victims of Child Abuse Programs:
Court-Appointed Special Advocate Program
OJP
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
Training for Judicial Personnel & Practitioners
OJP
750
750
750
750
Grants for Televised Testimony
OJP
250
250
250
250
Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies
OJP
28,000
28,000
28,000
28,000
Rural Domestic Violence & Child Abuse Enforcement
OJP
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
National Stalker & Domestic Violence Reduction
OJP
1,500
1,500
1,500
1,500
Drug Courts
OJP
100,000
29,000
150,000
250,000
221,000
106,558
Federal Funding:
Family Unity Demonstration Project: Federal Prisoners
OJP
360
360
360
360
Substance Abuse Treatment In Federal Prisons
BOP
13,500
13,500
13,500
13,500
Violence Against Women:
Federal Victim Counselors
USA
500
500
500
500
5
Training Programs
OJP
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
State Databases Study
OJP
200
200
200
200
National Baseline Study On Campus Sexual Assault
OJP
200
200
200
200
Missing Alzheimer's Disease Patient Alert Program
OJP
900
900
900
900
Subtotal, DOJ Prevention
127,500
56,500
586,440
713,940
657,440
415,465
5
Other Departments:
Education:
Family & Comm. Endeavor Schools Grant Program
11,100
31,050
42,150
42,150
20,323
Health and Human Services:
Com. Schools Youth Services & Supervision Grant Program.
25,900
37,000
72,450
98,350
61,350
29,581
National Community Economic Partnership
45,000
45,000
45,000
21,697
Ed. & Prev. to Reduce Sexual Assaults Against Women
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
Ed. & Prev. to Reduce Sexual Abuse of Runaway,
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
National Domestic Hotline (Safe Homes for Women)
1,000
1,000
400
1,400
400
400
Grants for Battered Women's Shelters
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
Youth Education & Domestic Violence
400
400
400
400
Community Programs on Domestic Violence
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
Number & Cost of Injuries Study
100
100
100
100
Interior:
Urban Recreation and At-Risk Youth
2,700
2,700
2,700
1,302
Capital Improvement to Prevent Crime in National Parks
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
Capital Improvement to Prevent Crime in Public Parks
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
Transportation:
Capital Improvement to Prevent Crime in Public Transportation
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
Violent Crime Control & Law Enforcement Act of 1994
09/21/94
1996 Proposed Funding
02:08 PM
(Dollars in thousands)
1995-1996
1995-1996
Total
Total
DOJ
1995
1995
1996
Total
Authorized
1996 Funding Proposal
Crime Bill Program
Agency
Authorized
Appropriated
Authorized
Authorized
Less 1995 Approp.
Amount
FTE
Housing and Urban Development:
Local Partnership Act
270,000
270,000
270,000
130,184
Treasury:
Gang Resistance Education & Training Projects
9,000
10,000
7,200
16,200
6,200
2,989
Subtotal, Other Departments Prevention
47,000
48,000
560,300
607,300
559,300
337,976
0
Total, Prevention Programs
174,500
104,500
1,146,740
1,321,240
1,216,740
753,442
5
Prisons
Department of Justice:
State and Local Funding/Grants:
Correctional Facil./Viol. Offender Incarceration Grants
OJP
175,000
24,500
750,000
925,000
900,500
434,188
Treatment of Tuberculosis in Correctional Institutions: State Grants
OJP
350
350
350
169
Federal Funding:
Incarceration of Undocumented Criminal Allens
OJP
130,000
130,000
300,000
430,000
300,000
300,000
Treatment of Tuberculosis in Correctional Institutions: Federal
OJP
350
350
350
169
Total, Prison Programs
305,000
154,500
1,050,700
1,355,700
1,201,200
734,525
0
State & Local Law Enforcement
Department of Justice:
State and Local Funding/Grants:
Community Policing: "Cops on the Beat"
CP
1,332,000
1,300,000
1,850,000
3,182,000
1,882,000
1,882,000
310
Police Recruitment
CP
2,000
2,000
2,000
964
Community-Based Justice Grants for Prosecutors
OJP
...
7,000
7,000
7,000
3,375
Rural Drug Enforcement Assistance
OJP
24,000
24,000
24,000
11,572
Police Corps
CP
20,000
20,000
20,000
9,643
Law Enforcement Scholarship Program
CP
20,000
20,000
20,000
9,643
Byme Program
OJP
580,000
450,000
130,000
710,000
260,000
260,000
Law Enforcement Family Support
OJP
2,500
2,500
2,500
1,205
DNA Identification State Grants
OJP
1,000
1,000
1,000
482
Improved Training & Tech. Auto.: Training & Tech Auto. Grants
OJP
10,000
10,000
10,000
4,822
Federal Assistance to Ease State Court Burdens
OJP
23,000
23,000
23,000
11,090
Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act
OJP
100,000
100,000
25,000
125,000
25,000
12,054
Federal Funding:
Improved Training & Technical Automation:
S&L Training at Quantico/Intelligence Gathering
FBI
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
Improve Tech Automation at Quantico
FBI
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
Subtotal, DOJ State & Local Law Enforcement
2,012,000
1,850,000
2,128,500
4,140,500
2,290,500
2,220,851
310
Management & Administration for State and Local Assistance Programs
na
na
na
na
na
na
162
Treasury:
Rural Drug Enforcement Training: FLETC
1,000
1,000
1,000
482
Total, State & Local Law Enforcement
2,012,000
1,850,000
2,129,500
4,141,500
2,291,500
2,221,333
472
Federal Law Enforcement
Department of Justice:
Federal Funding:
Criminal Allen Tracking Center
INS
3,400
3,400
3,400
3,400
20
Expeditious Deportation for Denied Asylum (Asylum Reform)
INS
64,000
49,000
90,000
154,000
105,000
84,400
754
Improving Border Controls
INS
228,000
181,000
185,000
413,000
232,000
232,000
810
Expanded Special Deportation Proceedings
INS
55,000
54,000
54,000
109,000
55,000
55,000
380
Violent Crime Control & Law Enforcement Act of 1994
09/21/94
1996 Proposed Funding
02:08 PM
(Dollars in thousands)
1995-1996
1995-1996
Total
Total
DOJ
1995
1995
1996
Total
Authorized
1996 Funding Proposal
Crime Bill Program
Agency
Authorized
Appropriated
Authorized
Authorized
Less 1995 Approp.
Amount
FTE
Gang Investigation Coordination & Info. Collection
OJP
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Additional DEA Agents
DEA
12,000
12,000
12,000
Annualization of 1995 New Agents
8,035
53
Agents for Heroin Domestic Enforcement
3,965
15
Additional Appropriation for the Dept. of Justice
40,000
40,000
40,000
Wireless Communication
FBI
8,000
4
Automated Booking Stations
GA
11,000
Freedom of Information Privacy Act Automation
GA
4,500
U.S. Marshals Service: Courthouses
USMS
16,500
40
Additional Appropriations for the FBI
FBI
35,000
35,000
35,000
Technical Support Center.
16,100
Advanced Telephony
18,900
Additional Appropriations for the USA
USA
5,000
5,000
5,000
Violent Crime Initiative
5,000
30
DNA Identification: FBI (DNA Program).
FBI
5,500
5,500
5,500
4,600
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Program
OJP
1,500
1,500
1,500
1,500
Senior Citizens Against Marketing Scams:
FBI Agents
FBI
750
750
750
750
10
U.S. Attorneys
USA
250
250
250
250
2
Public Awareness & Prevention Initiatives
OJP
1,000
1,000
1,000
500
Subtotal, DOJ Federal Law Enforcement
347,000
284,000
434,400
781,400
497,400
475,400
2,118
Other Departments:
Courts:
Education & Training for Federal Judges:
Courts of Appeals, District Courts, other Jud. Services
500
500
500
500
Federal Judiciary Center
100
100
100
100
Administrative Office of U.S. Courts
100
100
100
100
Additional Appropriations
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
National Commission on Crime Control & Prevention:
National Commission on Crime Control & Prevention
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
State Justice Institute:
Equal Justice of Women in the Courts: Training Grants
600
600
600
600
Treasury:
Additional Appropriations:
30,000
30,000
70,000
100,000
70,000
70,000
Subtotal, Other Departments Federal Law Enforcement
30,000
30,000
102,300
132,300
102,300
102,300
0
Total, Federal Law Enforcement
377,000
314,000
536,700
913,700
599,700
577,700
2,118
Total Crime Bill
2,868,500
2,423,000
4,863,640
7,732,140
5,309,140
4,287,000
2,595
Trust Fund Budget Authority
2,423,000
2,423,000
4,287,000
6,710,000
4,287,000
4,287,000
1 Total annualization costs is $10,402,000; hence, $2,367,000 will have to be funded from DEA's appropriation.
2 Assume Treasury will fund $8,000,000 for the wireless communication intitiative.
1
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
Base Request
Program Increases
1995
1995
1996
Conference
Base
Base
Domestic
Crime
Domestic
Crime
Total
1996
Action
Adjustments
Request
Discretionary
Control Fund
Discretionary
Control Fund
Increases
Request
Appropriation
Pos
F
TE
Amount
Pos
F
IE
Amount
Pos
FTE
Amount
Pos
FTE
Amount
Pos
FTE
Amount
Pos. FTE
Amount
Pos. FTE Amount
Pos. FTE Amount
Pos.
FTE
Amount
Justice Assistance
Nat Inst. of Juslice
27 000
690
27.690
27.690
1,000
1,000
26,690
Bur. of Jus. Statistics
21379
641
22 020
22.020
3,175
3.175
25,195
Missing Children
6721
6.721
6.721
6.721
RISS
14 500
14 500
14,500
14,500
White Collar Crime Info Center
1.400
1 400
1,400
1,400
Mgm 1 & Admin Direct
365
364
31777
11
4643
365
375
36.420
365
375
36.420
701
701
365
375
37,121
Mgm I & Admin CCF
72
67
3095
$
-879
72
72
2216
72
72
2.216
120
90
9.590
120
90
9.590
192
162
11,806
Sub Total - Mgmit 8 Admin
437
431
34872
0
16
3764
437
447
38 636
365
375
36.420
72
72
2216
701
120
90
9.590
120
90
10,291
557
537
48.927
Sub Total
437
431
105872
0
15
51105
437
447
110967
365
375
108.751
72
72
2.216
4,876
120
90
9.590
120
90
14,466
557
537
125,433
State & Local Law Enforcement
Formula Grants
150 000
450,000
190.000
260 000
450.000
Discretionary Grants
50000
50.000
50.000
50.000
50.000
100.000
Correctional Only us
12000
12000
12.000
12.000
Sub-total
512 000
512:00
252 000
260.000
50 000
0
50 000
562.000
Junende Justice returns
139,700
139.200
139 200
42.500
42.500
161.700
V Jim: 1 Child M Adt
112'0
11.250
11250
11,250
Commat Records Purpode
12000
99000
87.067
11.933
99.000
State Consectional Month
24253
21235
24233
405.591
405.591
429,846
Drug Courts
28719
28710
28.710
76.782
76.782
105 492
Violance Against person A :1
25710
25.740
25.740
102.960
102.960
128 700
Ounce of Prevention Council
1500
1 :00
1.500
5.532
5.532
7.032
Community Policing
SCAAP
126.700
128,700
128.700
49.500
166.300
217.800
346 500
CCF Programs Not Funded in 1005
Prevention
156.240
156.240
156.240
Prisons
335
335
335
State & Loc. Law Enforcement
32.221
32.221
32.221
Federal
2.965
2.965
2.965
Total OJP
437
431
1.076 227
of
16
095
437
447
1.081.322
365
375
598.268
72
72
483.054
o
o
146.876
120
90
960.536
120
90
1,107,412
557
537
2,188,734
Crime Victims fund
160 218
160.218
4.607
4,607
165.025
PSOB
2.072
62
2.134
2.134